by Mike Adams
the Health Ranger
July 10, 2010
from
NaturalNews Website
As a rule of thumb, I don't drink
anything that comes out of a cow.
But for the last several thousand years,
a large percentage of the human population has consumed cow's milk -
a substance that admittedly contains quite an impressive collection
of nutrients.
The problem today is that those nutrients are
artificially modified through
pasteurization (cooking) and
homogenization (breaking down fat molecules) to create a ready-made,
highly processed cow's milk beverage with a long shelf life that can
be sold to consumers as "milk."
In the history of food, pasteurized, homogenized cow's milk is a
relatively new thing. For most of recent history, milk has been
consumed as a fresh, raw beverage, just hours out of the cow. Each
day's milk was usually harvested that very morning from the local
cow, and most farms had at least one milk cow. (For many families,
it was what kept them alive through the harsh winters...)
During all these centuries, fresh cow's milk was considered a
nourishing, even lifesaving beverage that provided people with
hard-to-find proteins and fats in times when calories were hard to
come by.
Pasteurization
and the road to dead food
This went on until roughly the end of the 19th century, when
pasteurization was introduced to the milk industry as a way to
increase the shelf life of milk by killing the bacteria that spoil
it.
By "cooking" the milk, large milk
producers were able to centralize product production at distant
locations (large-scale dairy farms) and then ship the product to
consumers anywhere in the country. When kept at the right
refrigeration temperature, this pasteurized milk now had a shelf
life many times longer than raw milk.
So the dairy industry grew profitable and large, and over the next
few generations, Americans got used to "milk" meaning "pasteurized,
homogenized milk" even though it was an unnatural alteration of the
real milk that the country had grown up on.
Raw milk
rediscovered
Fast forward to the 21st century: Now, more and more
consumers are becoming aware of the health benefits of raw milk.
It's loaded with active probiotics, of
course, which we now know increase skin health and digestive health
while potentially even improving cognitive function. So naturally,
consumers started purchasing raw milk from their local farmers and
coops in order to benefit from this raw, unprocessed food.
(Actually, lots of health-conscious people have been doing this
since the 1960's, but "raw milk" didn't really become popular among
near-mainstream consumers until just the last few years...)
When people buy raw milk from local farmers, this of course takes
away profits from the large corporate milk producers that are
selling pasteurized, homogenized milk. So the dairy industry
attempted to get the federal government to destroy the competition
(the raw milk producers).
But instead of just saying,
"We want you to destroy our
competition," they made up an excuse, "Raw milk is dangerous!"
Yep: The same beverage that America was
raised on is now considered by the feds to be "too dangerous to
drink."
Sure, you can drink diet
soda laced with
aspartame or high-fructose corn syrup - two ingredients known to
cause degenerative disease - but you can't drink raw, wholesome,
fresh milk anyway because it's "too dangerous."
The idiotic
war against raw milk
Now the war is on.
State and federal regulatory agencies, spurred on
by the monopolistic business practices of the dairy industry, have
set out to criminalize the sale of raw milk.
They've,
-
raided raw milk
resellers
-
arrested raw milk marketers
-
seized countless gallons of raw
milk to be destroyed
Raw milk, the bureaucrats say, is dangerous because it hasn't been
sanitized yet. Raw milk is "dirty" while cooked, pasteurized or
irradiated milk is "clean." And Big Brother thinks you're not
supposed to eat "dirty" foods like raw milk.
Sure, you can smoke yourself into a lifetime of cancer - that's
fully approved by the government. You can slather your body with
personal care products laced with cancer-causing chemicals, because
that's also approved by the government.
You can drink brain-busting aspartame,
chow down on diabetes-promoting MSG, or swallow any number of
mouthfuls of processed foods laced with a thousand different
synthetic chemicals that probably cause everything from cancer to
Alzheimer's. Go take a
swim in the Gulf of Mexico and soak up some
Corexit dispersant chemicals - the government doesn't protect you
from any of that.
But raw milk? Well that's just too dangerous. It's all natural!
And if you're the whored-out U.S.
government - now run by commercial interests - natural is bad!
The secret
government plot to kill all your food
You see, food safety in America has come down to killing your food.
Only "dead food" is "safe food" in the
eyes of
the FDA and state health authorities. That's why they killed
your almonds (there are no more raw almonds commercially available
in the United States of America), and it's the same reason why
they're
gearing up to irradiate all your fresh produce.
The government wants to kill your food but it has nothing at all to
do with food safety. If the government were really interested in
food safety, it would ban the stuff that really promotes disease:
...you
get the idea.
But none of those things have been banned at all. Instead, of all
the thousands of things that are bad for your health, the government
has chosen to single out raw milk as somehow deserving the most
attention - even thought raw milk is arguably GOOD for your health
and not bad in the least!
So why does this matter to our freedom?
Because now, not only is the
government deciding what's good and bad for your (and legislating
laws against your free choice); but the government's ability to
determine what's good or bad is flawed in the first place.
Freedom of
choice
Like most freedom-loving Americans, I don't think the government has
any business telling you what to eat. (But then, neither do I think
corporations should have Free Speech to advertise all their junk
products, either, although that's another topic altogether.)
If some guy in Brooklyn wants to eat himself to death on hamburgers
and corn syrup, that's his right and his choice. The feds have no
business criminalizing his food choices, even if they do seem rather
poorly made.
But even if the feds were to start enforcing its control over your
food, it would only make sense to ban the most dangerous foods
first... you know, the stuff that's really causing epidemic disease
in America.
Stuff like,
-
high-fructose corn syrup
-
aspartame
-
MSG
-
partially-hydrogenated oils
-
petrochemical-derived artificial food
colors
-
dangerous chemical preservatives,
...and so on.
But none of those things are even being considered for any ban. And
that means, by any reasonable logic, that the ban isn't about your
health. It's not about "protecting you" from dangerous foods.
The government, after all, approves the sale of cigarettes, alcohol,
hair coloring chemicals and a thousand other things that are
terrible for your health. They aren't interested in protecting your
health in the least. What they are interested in doing is protecting
their corporate masters in the highly influential dairy industry.
And that's what this all comes down to:
The war on raw milk is a
juvenile attempt by the federal government to protect a profitable,
powerful industry by destroying its competition regardless of the
consequences to your health - and regardless of what freedoms they
destroy in the process.
Your right to buy what you choose has now been overthrown by the
government's desire to protect the processed-milk dairy industry.
And that's why the cow in my CounterThink cartoon sprays the
bureaucrats with raw milk, shouting,
"Take THAT, you bureaucrats!"
Check out my CounterThink cartoon
right here.
And if you'd like to watch my behind-the-scenes video which explains
this cartoon, see below video:
This text will be replaced by the player
|
|