by Jim Stone

Freelance Journalist

May 29, 2011

from Abeldanger Website
 

This is a complex article.

If you have troubles understanding it, just look at below picture 1 of the vanished reactor, below picture 2 of the destroyed facility and below picture 3, of Magna BSP's camera, and think for a while...

picture 1

The pictures say it all, the article only explains it.

When it is so obvious, pictures really are enough. The lies in the press really are so deep you were never told this. If there is one thing that can kill the lies forever, it is these pictures which can be renamed and have no searchable text.

These photos can make the truth immortal. Archive and post!

picture 2

NEW INFO - Japan offered to enrich uranium for IRAN!
Here are the links:

• Ynet news

• Inside Japan News Network

• The New American

• Rianovosti news

• Hindustan Times

• Zee News

And four months later the Dimona Dozen showed up with a really fancy camera!!

This report uses classified leaked high resolution photos of the destruction of Fukushima originally posted on Pink Tentacle to support it's claims.

They are:

1. Reactor 3 is completely missing, which means the press and anyone who has claimed anything about pressures, temperatures, containment, act about reactor 3 after March 14 are lying and people need to pay attention to it, because failure of the public to realize the massive extent of the lies about what is going on there will leave the door open to a repeat event.
   
    

2. Reactor 4 is building 7, demolished by explosives.

    

   Reactor 4 had been defueled and was undergoing replacement of it's internal stainless steel shroud, yet blew it's containment anyway. That is the FINAL smoking gun, an empty reactor is inert, and cannot produce an explosion, yet one happened at 4 that was so powerful it destroyed the structure leaving it in danger of falling over.

    

   Overheated open fuel pools cannot produce hydrogen because in an open fuel pool the water boils off at 100 Celsius, and won't be present in pressurized form at 2,000 degrees Celsius to liberate it's hydrogen by losing it's oxygen to the zircon cladding in the fuel rods. The rods will prefer the free oxygen in the air and burn long before attempting to claim the oxygen in whatever humidity there might be.

    

   The fact that the rods can catch fire only enforces the fact that they cannot release hydrogen in open air the way they can in a reactor. If you entertain the fantasy that they could, another problem against buildup presents itself - the hydrogen would be safely burned the moment it was created on the surface of the superheated rods. There would be no buildup.

    

   Fuel rods are many orders of magnitude below incapable of going supercritical also, even if totally melted down. The explosion at #4 was flatly impossible.
   
   Reactor 4's dome was removed for defueling. Drone photos prove it. This dispels the rumors surrounding unit 4's explosion. Some people have said that this reactor was secretly in operation to enrich plutonium. This photo proves it was disassembled for shroud replacement as stated.

    

   Tepco is going out of it's way trying to explain the explosions, especially at reactor 4, because they did indeed occur, so an explanation is needed. As a result, they are giving reasons that cannot happen, just to say something.

    

   They need to see this post and get the Arava perspective (Arava is a district surrounding Dimona).

    

   
   
    

3. That the destruction of the facility is so severe it could only have been accomplished with nuclear weapons.

    

   Hydrogen produces a non-ideal subsonic explosion. It cannot turn concrete into dust. It can produce high pressures if sealed off, but the metal roof on all the reactor containments should have provided the relief and been the only thing destroyed.

    

   It takes a high intensity explosive to strip concrete off rebar, a blast wave many times faster than supersonic. This means that whatever happened at Fukushima did not have blast characteristics that fit the "official" story. If hydrogen blew the place apart (still many times beyond impossible, even if sealed off), it should be laying around in large pieces, with very little dust.

    

   Dust is much of what you see in the wreckage at Fukushima. If many tons of C4 had been brought into the place and set off, it could destroy it also, but remember that in a nuclear facility you have to keep what you are doing hidden if you intend to destroy it, so even at a thousand pounds a gun type nuke would be far more appropriate, especially when you have successfully duped the plant operators into believing it is only a security camera.

    

   If you missed it in the high resolution photo of the destroyed facility, I took a car that was laying around in the remains and placed it on top of one of the blown away walls at reactor 3, which clearly gives the reference that the walls had support columns at least 15 feet thick. Fukushima was built with the Mark 1 containment design, but beyond Mark 1 standards which was a common upgrade (reference is the included photos, it is obvious).

    

   It is true that gas explosions can be very destructive, but only in facilities that were not designed to handle them. Even the basic Mark 1 containment was many times beyond capable of withstanding the worst hydrogen blast.
   
    

4. That nuclear weapon(s) were placed inside of the reactor containment(s) disguised as security cameras installed under contract this year by Arava based security firm Magna BSP (Arava is a district around Dimona, not a city.)

    

   Their "security cameras" weighed over 1,000 pounds and were the size and shape of gun type nuclear weapons (below image).

    

   

   picture 3

    

   The reason Magna BSP gave for the odd shape, enormous weight, and giant proportions of their cameras was that they were stereoscopic. They have creatively called them bi-scopic so when you search on Google, their monstrous cameras are the only thing that comes up (outside of Dj lighting and a gun scope)

    

   Try it. Type "Biscopic camera" into Google images, (without the quotes) it's a hoot! This helps marketing I guess. The need for such a large stereoscopic camera could be plausible at an airstrip, where the camera would need depth perception out miles, but not indoors where focal lengths are short.

    

   Other manufacturers have units appropriate for indoor focal lengths which are only twice the size of ordinary monocular security cameras. Depth perception going out miles could also be accomplished with two separately mounted cameras weighing only a few pounds; the giant thousand pounder is a dead giveaway.

    

   Magna does make passive radar systems which require a large body, but the owl could accomplish it's claimed function with two small lightweight cameras (5 or so lbs, not tiny) and the processor in a modern laptop.

    

   Why this giant thing? Note - a not yet produced graphical model is what you see most on Google, the ones produced thus far are ugly boxes.

...9/11, 4/11, 3/11? See a pattern?

Let's not see a 6/11. Your time and effort in spreading the word may really make a difference. Due to the many positive e-mails about getting the truth out, rather than hold back I am going to put the original information back.

It follows below.
 

The quake was not what we were told

In fact, the quake was a bold faced lie, packing a political agenda.

There is even more proof now, and it goes beyond the linked Japanese chart. This original seismic data is the smoking gun, however, I have something better. I finally suppressed the urge to vomit and analyzed the lies told by the USGS, and from them wrote this sad, sad story about how it really was, not what you will see in the video.

Keep in mind that precise top speeds of flying debris cannot be determined with accuracy, but this story will at least be close to the numbers put out by the USGS.

Meet Atsuo, Airi, and Akiyoshi. They were all the best and most dedicated people at the NHK newsroom, in Sendai Japan. Akiyoshi loved Airi, and Atsuo was the one who introduced them.

Unfortunately, all 3 died in the quake.

• Akiyoshi got a severe cut and bled to death when he hit a display screen behind him at 44 miles an hour, and was then thrown out through a hole in a collapsed wall.

• Airi followed pretty much the same path, and died beside him in the rubble.

• Atsuo flew through the open door behind him, then crashed through a window and was crushed when he landed in a massive seismic crack in the road, which closed in on him.

Others in the newsroom died also, but I never thought up names for them. At least, according to the official USGS charts.

The laser printer was never found, but the table it was on ended up on top of the rubble, smashed to pieces, where one of the few survivors used a piece of the metal frame to splint his broken leg.
 

The video below is the one I pulled the frames out of for the sad, sad story.

It is a video of a newsroom at the hardest hit area in Japan, and it SAYS IT ALL. This is when the quake was happening live. They are alarmed there is an earthquake, but most people stay seated in their chairs.

Some people even keep typing on their computers as the quake happens.

Also, note that most of the stuff stays on the desks, at the end, a laser printer is still sitting on a cheap table, etc. some things fall but things return to normal quickly, all the while the English announcer is reading a script of devastation with all the pep of some paid fool who does not believe what he is saying in a cheezy infomercial.

The quake was significant, but only in a 6.0 sense, as recorded by the seismographs.

This is important footage, because it proves the earthquake measured at a 6.8 was an instrumentation based Richter reading. Confusion between the Shindo and Richter scale is being used to cover this up.

I chose this video because it's location is documented to have been the worst affected, and was recorded in a news room with a known fixed location.

 

Remember that this video is proof of what really went on.

This means there never were significant aftershocks, never was a natural tsunami, and if they lied about that, what else? This video is pivotal and vital to exposing the truth.

Sure there was a quake, but at this newsroom it was not much over a six if it even was a six. I chose this video because the news room is within eyeshot of station MYG012, which was used by the USGS to make these graphs (in above image) which represent an 8.8, as was stated in this (English) newscast and was probably used as a guide to fudge the lie due to the closeness of the newsroom to the seismic station.

Looking at these charts, it is super easy to get a rough guess at how fast people would have flown.

44MPH to the North, and 28MPH to the East. Those are not precise numbers but the charts are proven wrong by the video because according to the charts people should have entered uncontrolled flight. Here is the full chart put out by the USGS.

Of course, they offer no reading from MYG011, which was closest to the 9.0 "epicenter" by a long shot, because it only got a 5.63's worth of shaking.

I will do that work for them. That map is below.

I challenge ANYONE to send me pictures of this quake showing me devastation in an area not hit by the tsunami. All we have, all the pictures are tsunami damage. Let's see pictures of quake damage. The Kobe quake was a 6.9/7.2 depending on source. That makes this quake, at a 9.0 100X as powerful. Sendai was near the epicenter and would have been devastated if it really happened.

Look at the earthquake photos of damage from the Kobe quake, and try to find ONE THING SIMILAR in SENDAI. Just try. They do not exist.

Outside of the tsunami, the quake which supposedly hit Sendai with many times the power of the one in Kobe, did not damage a single building there. Sendai was only 48 miles from the epicenter of this "9.0" which would have devastated everything in an area 1,000 miles across if it was real. All of Japan would be toast.

Try to find a photo of seismic damage in Sendai. I challenge you. Try to find it in any of the coastal cities, as little as 25 miles from the "epicenter".

I looked for 5 hours, and except for some tanks that fell at a brewery not a single one exists. No pictures of collapsed skyscrapers or high rises equals NO 9.0. You will not find a single skyscraper photo where the windows got broken either.

You will find no downed power poles, no flipped over cars, no uprooted trees, no derailed trains (except for one the tsunami hit), and the road damage is typical of even a 5.0. You will not find pictures of a single damaged multi story building or even a structurally damaged wood framed house outside the tsunami zone.

In Sendai the quake messed up grocery stores and kitchens and that really is about it.
 

And now, I will say it like I knew it had to be

I believe the phony 9.0 story was used as seismic cover for a tsunami nuke, which produced the tsunami of a 9.0 when detonated in the Japan trench (where no earthquakes of significance happen) as punishment for Japan offering to enrich uranium for Iran.

The rest of the story, the concealment, is black ops. Bet on it. In the tsunami videos, the tsunami rips through pristine and undamaged cities, where business as usual is obvious and the tsunami is an ambush; not 9.0 earthquake ravaged debris. The quake is a paper thin story taped together by the undeserved trust of a gullible public.

And the stories? The CIA did not hire a million people last year for nothing. If there is evidence of a 9.0 SHOW ME.

A 9.0 will devastate an area over 1,000 miles across. That is how big a 9.0 is.

The entire nation should be in ruins, especially judging from the damage the 6.9 Kobe quake did, and no where, no where outside the tsunami zone in the entire country is there a single damaged multi story building, a single collapsed bridge, a single structurally damaged wood framed house, or skyscraper. If a picture exists that can be definitively pinned to this quake, show me.

The only collapsed structure in all of Japan was an old welfare shelter near station MYG004, the true epicenter.

Take a look at these frame captures, and ask a question:

• Why is no one trying to run?

• Why are the cars all just parked peacefully as the tsunami arrived?

• Why was there no warning?

• Why did the tsunami sirens only go off after the tsunami arrived?

• Could it be that the people and the government had not felt a significant earthquake and did not measure one either?

Question:

Why are none of the roads packed with people trying to flee the approaching tsunami?

Could it be that the people and government were not expecting one?

Tsunami sirens blare only when it arrives, rather than 40 minutes before, which is how much warning they would have had if a real quake in the ocean had been detected. Consider that. Parking lots full of cars, everyone at work, no one trying to leave. AMBUSH!!

When people keep typing at their keyboards during the quake, it's obviously not what we were told.