|
Part II
Hubble's New "Runaway Planet"
- A Unique Opportunity for Testing the Exploding
Planet Hypothesis and Hyperdimensional Physics -
 Lt. Col Thomas E. Bearden, retired army
officer and physicist, has been perhaps the most vocal recent
proponent for restoring integrity to the scientific and historical
record regarding James Clerk Maxwell -- by widely promulgating his
original equations; in a series of meticulously documented papers on
the subject, going back at least 20 years,
Bearden has carried on a
relentless one-man research effort regarding what Maxwell really
claimed.
His painstaking, literally thousands of man-hours of
original source documentation has led directly to the following,
startling conclusion:
Maxwell’s original theory is, in fact, the true, so-called
"Holy
Grail" of physics ... the first successful unified field theory in
the history of Science ... a fact apparently completely unknown to
the current proponents of "Kaluza-Klein," "Supergravity," and
"Superstring" ideas ....
Just how successful, Bearden documents below:
" ... In discarding the scalar
component of the quaternion, Heaviside and Gibbs unwittingly
discarded the unified EM/G [electromagnetic/ gravitational]
portion of Maxwell’s theory that arises when the
translation/directional components of two interacting quaternions reduce to zero, but the scalar resultant remains and
infolds a deterministic, dynamic structure that is a function of
oppositive directional/translational components. In the
infolding of EM energy inside a scalar potential, a structured
scalar potential results, almost precisely as later shown by
Whittaker but unnoticed by the scientific community. The simple
vector equations produced by Heaviside and Gibbs captured only
that subset of Maxwell’s theory where EM and gravitation are
mutually exclusive. In that subset, electromagnetic circuits and
equipment will not ever, and cannot ever, produce gravitational
or inertial effects in materials and equipment.
 "Brutally, not a single one of those
Heaviside/Gibbs equations
ever appeared in a paper or book by James Clerk Maxwell, even
though the severely restricted Heaviside/Gibbs interpretation is
universally and erroneously taught in all Western universities
as Maxwell’s theory.
"As a result of this artificial restriction of Maxwell’s theory,
Einstein also inadvertently restricted his theory of general
relativity, forever preventing the unification of electromagnetics and relativity. He also essentially prevented
the present restricted general relativity from ever becoming an
experimental, engineerable science on the laboratory bench,
since a hidden internalized electromagnetics causing a
deterministically structured local spacetime curvature was
excluded.
"Quantum mechanics used only the Heaviside/Gibbs externalized electromagnetics and completely missed Maxwell’s internalized
and ordered electromagnetics enfolded inside a structured scalar
potential. Accordingly, QM [quantum mechanics] maintained its
Gibbs statistics of quantum change, which is nonchaotic a
priori. Quantum physicists by and large excluded Bohm’s hidden
variable theory, which conceivably could have offered the
potential of engineering quantum change -- engineering physical
reality itself.
"Each of these major scientific disciplines missed and excluded
a subset of their disciplinary area, because they did not have
the scalar component of the quaternion to incorporate. Further,
they completely missed the significance of the Whittaker
approach, which already shows how to apply and engineer the very
subsets they had excluded.
"What now exists in these areas are three separate, inconsistent
disciplines. Each of them unwittingly excluded a vital part of
its discipline, which was the unified field part. Ironically,
then, present physicists continue to exert great effort to find
the missing key to unification of the three disciplines, but
find it hopeless, because these special subsets are already
contradictory to one another, as is quite well-known to
foundations physicists.
"Obviously, if one wishes to unify physics, one must add back
the unintentionally excluded, unifying subsets to each
discipline. Interestingly, all three needed subsets turn out to
be one and the same ..."
-- T.E. Bearden,
"Possible Whittaker Unification of Electromagnetics, General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics,"
(Association of Distinguished American Scientists 2311 Big Cove
Road, Huntsville, Alabama, 35801)
Given Bearden’s analysis -- what did we
actually lose ... when science "inadvertently lost Maxwell ..?"
If two key physics papers often cited by Bearden (which
appeared decades after the death of Maxwell), are accurate ... we
lost nothing less than... the "electrogravitic" control of gravity itself!!
The critically-important research cited by Bearden was originally
published by "Sir Edmund Whittaker" (the same cited earlier in this
paper), beginning in 1903.
-
the first was titled "On the partial
differential equations of mathematical physics" (Mathematische
Annalen, Vol. 57, 1903, p.333-335)
-
the second, "On an Expression of
the Electromagnetic Field due to Electrons by means of two Scalar
Potential Functions" (Proceedings of the London Mathematical
Society, Vol.1, 1904, p. 367-372)
Whittaker, a leading world-class physicist himself, single-handedly
rediscovered the "missing" scalar components of Maxwell’s original
quaternions, extending their (at the time) unseen implications for
finally uniting "gravity" with the more obvious electrical and
magnetic components known as "light."
In the first paper, as Bearden
described, Whittaker theoretically explored the existence of a
"hidden" set of electromagnetic waves traveling in two simultaneous
directions in the scalar potential of the vacuum -- demonstrating
how to use them to curve the local and/or distant "spacetime" with
electromagnetic radiation, in a manner directly analogous to
Einstein’s later "mass-curves-space" equations. This key Whittaker
paper thus lays the direct mathematical foundation for an
electrogravitic theory/technology of gravity control.
In the second
paper, Whittaker demonstrated how two "Maxwellian scalar potentials
of the vacuum" -- gravitationally curving spacetime -- could be
turned back into a detectable "ordinary" electromagnetic field by
two interfering "scalar EM waves"... even at a distance.
 Whittaker accomplished this by demonstrating mathematically that,
"the field of force due to a gravitating body can be analyzed, by a
spectrum analysis’ as it were, into an infinite number of
constituent fields; and although the whole field of force does not
vary with time, yet each of the constituent fields is an ondulatory
character, consisting of a simple-disturbance propagated with
uniform velocity ... [and] the waves will be longitudinal (top) ...
These results assimilate the propagation of gravity to that of light
... [and] would require that gravity be propagated with a finite
velocity, which however need not be the same as that of light
[emphasis added], and may be enormously greater ..."
(Op. Cit., "On
the partial differential equations of mathematical physics")
 Remarkably, four years before Whittaker’s theoretical analysis of
these potentials (pun intended ...), on the evening of July 3-4,
1899,
Nikola Tesla (right) -- the literal inventor of modern
civilization (via the now worldwide technology of "alternating
current") -- experimentally anticipated "Whittaker’s interfering
scalar waves" by finding them in nature; from massive experimental
radio transmitters he had built on a mountain top in Colorado, he
was broadcasting and receiving (by his own assertion) "longitudinal
stresses" (as opposed to conventional EM "transverse waves") through
the vacuum.
This he was accomplishing with his own, hand-engineered
equipment (produced according to Maxwell’s original, quaternion
equations), when he detected an interference "return" from a passing
line of thunderstorms. Tesla termed the phenomenon a "standing
columnar wave," and tracked it electromagnetically for hours as the
cold front moved across the West (Nikola Tesla, Colorado Springs
Notes 1899-1900, Nolit, Beograd, Yugoslavia, 1978 pp. 61-62).
[Many have since speculated that
Tesla’s many other astonishing (to the period) technological
accomplishments, many of which apparently "were lost" with his
death in 1942, were based on this true understanding of
Maxwell’s original, "hyperdimensional" electromagnetic ideas
...]
Tesla’s experimental earlier detection
notwithstanding, what Whittaker theoretically demonstrated years
after Tesla was that future electrical engineers could also take
Maxwell’s original 4-space, quaternion description of
electromagnetic waves (the real "Maxwell’s Equations"), add his own
(Whittaker’s) specific gravitational potential analysis (stemming
from simply returning Maxwell’s scalar quaternions in Heaviside’s
version of "Maxwell’s Equations"...), and produce a workable
"unified field theory" (if not technology!) of gravity control ...
unless by now, in some government "black project," they already
have...
 And what we’ve deliberately been "leaked" over the last seven years,
in repeated video images of "exotic vehicles" performing impossible,
non-Newtonian maneuvers on official NASA TV shuttle coverage ... is
simply the result! (click image right)
Theory is one thing (Maxwell’s or Whittaker’s), but
experimental
results are supposedly the ultimate Arbiter of Scientific Truth.
Which makes it all the more curious that Tesla’s four-year
observational anticipation of Whittaker’s startling analysis of
Maxwell -- the experimental confirmation of an electromagnetic
"standing columnar (longitudinal) wave" in thunderstorms -- has
been
resolutely ignored by both physicists and electrical engineers for
the past 100 years; as have the stunning NASA TV confirmations of
"something" (above) maneuvering freely in Earth orbit.
With that as prologue, a new generation of physicists, also educated
in the grand assumption that "Heaviside’s Equations" are actually
"Maxwell’s," were abruptly brought up short in 1959 with another
remarkable, equally elegant experiment -- which finally demonstrated
in the laboratory the stark reality of Maxwell’s "pesky scalar
potentials" ... those same "mystical" potentials that
Heaviside so
effectively banished for all time from current (university-taught)
EM theory.
 In that year two physicists,
Yakir Aharonov and David Bohm,
conducted a seminal "electrodynamics" laboratory experiment
("Significance of Electromagnetic Potentials in Quantum Theory," The
Physical Review, Vol. 115, No. 3, pp. 485-491; August, 1959).
Aharonov and Bohm, almost 100 years after
Maxwell first predicted
their existence, succeeded in actually measuring the "hidden
potential" of free space, lurking in Maxwell’s original scalar
quaternion equations. To do so, they had to cool the experiment to a
mere 9 degrees above Absolute Zero, thus creating a total shielding
around a superconducting magnetic ring [for a slightly different
version of this same experiment (click image
left); the oscillation of
electrical resistance in the ring (bottom graph) is due to the
changing electron "wave functions" -- triggered by the "hidden
Maxwell scalar potential" created by the shielded magnet -- see
text, below].
Once having successfully accomplished this non-trivial laboratory
set up, they promptly observed an "impossible" phenomenon:
Totally screened, by all measurements, from the magnetic influence
of the ring itself, a test beam of electrons fired by Aharonov and
Bohm at the superconducting "donut," nonetheless, changed their
electronic state ("wave functions") as they passed through the
observably "field-free" region of the hole -- indicating they were
sensing "something," even though it could NOT be the ring’s magnetic
field. Confirmed now by decades of other physicists’ experiments as
a true phenomenon (and not merely improper shielding of the magnet),
this "Aharonov-Bohm Effect" provides compelling proof of a deeper
"spatial strain" -- a "scalar potential" -- underlying the existence
of a so-called magnetic "force-field" itself. (Later experiments
revealed a similar effect with shielded electrostatic fields ...)
All of which provides compelling proof of "something else,"
underlying all reality, capable of transmitting energy and
information across space and time ... even in the complete absence
of an electromagnetically detectable 3-D spatial "field"....
Maxwell’s quaternion ... hyperdimensional "potential."
So, what does all this have to do with NASA’s announcement of a "new
planet?"
If a "potential" without a field can exist in space -- as Maxwell’s
quaternion analysis first asserted, and Aharonov-Bohm "only" a
century later ultimately found -- then, as defined by Maxwell in his
comparisons of the aether with certain properties of laboratory
"solids," such a potential is equivalent to an unseen, vorticular
(rotating) "stress" in space. Or, in Maxwell’s own words (first
written in 1873 ...):
"There are physical quantities of
another kind [in the aether] which are related to directions in
space, but which are not vectors. Stresses and strains in solid
bodies are examples, and so are some of the properties of bodies
considered in the theory of elasticity and in the theory of
double [rotated] refraction. Quantities of this class require
for their definition nine [part of the "27-line"...] numerical
specifications. They are expressed in the language of
quaternions by linear and vector functions of a vector ..."
-- J.C. Maxwell
"A Treatise on Electricity and
Magnetism"
(Vol.1, 3rd Edition, New York, 1954)
And stresses, when they are relieved,
must release energy into their surroundings ...
There is now much fevered discussion among physicists, (~100 years
post-Maxwell) of the Quantum Electrodynamics Zero Point Energy (ZPE)
of space -- or, "the energy of the vacuum"; to many familiar with
the original works of Maxwell, Kelvin, et. al., this sounds an awful
lot like the once-familiar "aether" ... merely updated and now
passing under "an assumed name." Thus, creating -- then relieving --
a "stress" in Maxwell’s vorticular aether is precisely equivalent to
tapping the "energy of the vacuum" -- which, according to current
"quantum mechanics’ models," possesses a staggering amount of such
energy per cubic inch of space.
Even inefficiently releasing a tiny
percentage of this "strain energy" into our three dimensions -- or,
into a body existing in three-dimensional space -- could make it
appear as if the energy was coming from nowhere ... "something from
nothing." In other words, to an entire generation of students and
astrophysicists woefully ignorant of Maxwell’s real
equations, such energy would appear as...,
"Perpetual motion!"
Given the prodigious amount of "vacuum energy" calculated by modern
physicists (trillions of atomic bomb equivalents per cubic
centimeter ...), even a relatively minor but sudden release of such
vast vacuum (aether) stress potential inside a planet ... could
literally destroy it...
Finally answering the crucial astrophysical objection to the
"exploded planet model" that Van Flandern has been encountering ...
"But Tom -- just how do you blow
up’ an entire world?!"
The answer is now obvious: via
hyperdimensional "vacuum stress energy" ... ala Whittaker and
Maxwell.
As we shall show, it is this "new" source of energy -- in a far more
"controlled" context -- that seems also to be responsible now for
not only the "anomalous infrared excesses" observed in the so-called
"giant outer planets" of this solar system... it is this same source of energy (in the
Hyperdimensional Physics
Model) that, according to our analysis, must now be primarily
responsible for the radiated energies of stars ... including the Sun
itself.
Since, in
three dimensions, all energy eventually "degrades"
to random motions -- via Kelvin and Gibb’s 19th Century Laws of
Thermodynamics (it’s called "increasing entropy") -- "stress energy"
of the aether (vacuum) released inside a material object, even if it
initially appears in a coherent form -- driving, for instance, the
anomalous (1400 mile-per-hour!), planet-girdling winds of distant
Neptune’s "jet streams" -- will eventually degrade to simple, random
heat ... ultimately radiated away as "excess infrared emissions"
into space. It’s the initial, astrophysical conditions under which
such "Maxwellian space potentials" can be released inside a
planet (or a star ...), that have been the central focus of our
efforts for ten years... to create a predictive, mathematical "hyperdimensional model" of
such physics.
The entire question comes down to:
"What set of known spatial
conditions will slowly, predictably, release the potential
strains of 4-space into 3-space’ ... inside a massive world ...
so that when this energy inevitably degrades to heat, its
radiative signature identifies the original hyperdimensional’
source?"
Fortunately, we are surrounded by almost
half a dozen examples close at hand: the giant, "anomalously
radiating" planets of this solar system (and some major moons). Over
the past decade, as we have attempted to understand their anomalous
IR radiation, one thing has become clear -- to a first order, the
"infrared excesses" of the giant planets all seem to correlate very
nicely with one parameter each has in common -- regardless of their
individual masses, elemental compositions, or distance from the Sun:
their total system "angular momentum."
The mass of a body and the rate at which it spins, in classical
physics, determines an object’s "angular momentum." In our
Hyperdimensional Model, its a bit more complicated -- because
objects apparently separated by distance in this (3-space) dimension
are in fact connected in a "higher" (4-space) dimension; so, in the
HD model, one also adds in the orbital momentum of an object’s
gravitationally-tethered satellites -- moons in the case of planets;
planets, in the case of the Sun, or companion stars in the case of
other stars.
 When one graphs the total
angular momentum of a set of objects --
such as the radiating outer planets of this solar system (plus Earth
and Sun) -- against the total amount of internal energy each object
radiates to space, the results are striking
(click image right):
The more total system angular momentum a planet (or any celestial
body) possesses (as defined above -- object plus satellites), the
greater its intrinsic "brightness," i.e. the more "anomalous energy"
it apparently is capable of "generating."
And, as can be seen from this key diagram
(image right), this striking linear
dependence now seems to hold across a range of luminosity and
momentum totaling almost three orders of magnitude ... almost
1000/1!
Especially noteworthy, the Earth (not "a collapsing gas giant," by
any stretch of the imagination) also seems to fit precisely this
empirical energy relationship: when the angular momentum of the Moon
is added to the "spin momentum" of its parent planet, the resulting
correlation with measurements derived from internal "heat budget"
studies of the Earth are perfectly fitted to this solar-system-wide
empirical relationship -- even though the Earth’s internal energy is
supposedly derived from "radioactive sources."
 And, as can be seen from the accompanying historical comparison
(click image left),
this striking solar system linear relationship is actually more
tightly constrained (even at this early stage) than the original
Hubble "redshift data" supporting the Big Bang!
This discovery contains major implications, not only for past
geophysics and terrestrial evolution ... but for future geological
and climatological events -- "Earth changes," as some have termed
them. These may be driven, not by rising solar interactions or
by-products of terrestrial civilization (accumulating "greenhouse
gases" from burning fossil fuels), but by this same "hyperdimensional
physics." If so, then learning a lot more about the mechanisms of
this physics -- and quickly! -- is a critical step toward
intervening and eventually controlling our future well-being, if not
our destiny, on (and off!) this planet ...
For the "Hyperdimensional Physics" model, this simple but powerful
relationship now seems to be the equivalent of Relativity’s E=MC2 :
a celestial object’s total internal luminosity seems dependent upon
only one physical parameter:
L=mr2 = total
system angular momentum (object, plus all satellites)
There is a well-known "rule of thumb" in science, perhaps best
expressed by a late Noble Laureate, physicist Richard Feynman:
"You can recognize truth by its
beauty and simplicity. When you get it right, it is obvious that
it is right -- at least if you have any experience -- because
usually what happens is that more comes out than goes in ... The
inexperienced, the crackpots, and people like that, make guesses
that are simple, but you can immediately see that they are
wrong, so that does not count. Others, the inexperienced
students, make guesses that are very complicated, and it sort of
looks as if it is all right, but I know it is not true because
the truth always turns out to be simpler that you thought ..."
This startling relationship -- our
discovery of the simple dependence of an object’s internal
luminosity on its total system angular momentum -- has that "feel"
about it; it is simple ... it is elegant ... in fact... it could even be true.
But, as can be seen from examining the luminosity/angular momentum
diagram again, there also appears to be one glaring exception to
this otherwise strikingly linear relationship: The Sun itself.
Independent research, involving over 30 years of attempted
confirmation of the Sun’s basic energy source -- in the form of
solar/terrestrial observations of tiny atomic particles called
"neutrinos," supposedly coming from the center of the Sun
(above image) -- have
left laboratory physicists and astrophysicists with a major
astronomical enigma:
The Sun is not emitting anything like the number of neutrinos
required by the "Standard Solar Model" for its observed energy
emission; if its energy is due to "thermo-nuclear reactions" (as the
Standard Model demands), then the observed "neutrino deficit" is
upwards of 60%: even more remarkable, certain kinds of primary
neutrinos (calculated as required to explain the bulk of the solar
interior’s fusion reactions, based on laboratory measurements) turn
out to be simply missing altogether!
So --
what really fuels the Sun?
 The answer to the Sun’s apparent
violation of the Standard Solar
Model -- ironically, is contained in its striking "violation" of our
key angular momentum/luminosity diagram (click image right):
In the Hyperdimensional Model, the Sun’s
primary energy source -- like the planets’ -- must be driven by its
total angular momentum -- its own "spin momentum," plus the total
angular momentum of the planetary masses orbiting around it. Any
standard astronomical text reveals that, though the Sun contains
more than 98% of the mass of the solar system, it contains less than
2% of its total angular momentum. The rest is in the planets. Thus,
in adding up their total contribution to the Sun’s angular momentum
budget -- if the HD model is correct -- we should see the Sun
following the same line on the graph that the planets, from Earth to
Neptune, do.
It doesn’t.
The obvious answer to this dilemma is that the HD model is simply
wrong. The less obvious is that we’re missing something ... Like ...
additional planets (above)!
By adding another big planet (or a couple of smaller ones) beyond
Pluto (several hundred times the Earth’s distance from the Sun --
below), we can move the Sun’s total angular momentum to the right on
the graph (click above right image), until it almost intersects the line (allowing for a
percentage, about 30%, of internal energy expected from genuine
thermonuclear reactions ...). This creates the specific "HD
prediction" that "the current textbook tally of the Sun’s angular
momentum is deficient because ..."
We haven’t discovered all the remaining members of the solar system
yet!
As a dividend, this promptly presents us with our first key test of
the Hyperdimensional Model:
1) Find those planets!
The second test of the Hyperdimensional Model is that, unlike
other efforts to explain anomalous planetary energy emissions
via continued "planetary collapse," or "stored primordial heat,"
the hyperdimensional approach specifically predicts one radical,
definitive observational difference from all other existing
explanations
2) HD energy generation in both planets and stars should
be -- must be -- variable.
This is simply implicit in the mechanism which generates the
hyperdimensional energy in the first place: ever changing
hyperspatial geometry.
If the ultimate source of planetary (or stellar) energy is this "vorticular
(rotating) spatial stress between dimensions" (ala Maxwell), then
the constantly changing pattern (both gravitationally and
dimensionally) of interacting satellites in orbit around a major
planet/star must modulate that stress pattern as a constantly
changing, geometrically twisted "aether" (ala Whittaker’s
amplifications of Maxwell). In our Hyperdimensional Model, it is
this "constantly changing hyperspatial geometry"
 that is capable
(via resonant rotations with the masses in question -- either as
spin, or circular orbital motions) of extracting energy from this
underlying "rotating, vorticular aether" ... and then releasing it
inside material objects.
Initially, this "excess energy" can appear in many different forms
-- high-speed winds, unusual electrical activity, even enhanced
nuclear reactions -- but, ultimately, it must all degrade to simple
"excess heat." Because of the basic physical requirement for
resonance in effectively coupling a planet (or a star’s) "rotating
3-D mass to the underlying 4-D aether rotation," this excess energy
generation must also, inevitably, vary with time -- as the changing
orbital geometry of the "satellites" interacts with the spinning
primary (and the underlying, "vorticular aether"...) in and
out-of-phase.
For these reasons, as stated earlier, time-variability of this
continuing energy exchange must be a central hallmark of this entire
"HD process."
[Incidentally, understanding this
basic "hyperdimensional transfer mechanism," in terms of
Maxwell’s original quaternions (that describe "a rotating,
vorticular, four-dimensional sponge-like aether"), immediately
lends itself to creating a "Hyperdimensional Technology" based
on this same mechanism.
The fundamental "violations" of current physics exhibited by
so-called "free energy" machines -- from the explicitly-rotating
"N-machine" (click above left
image) to the initially frustrating time-variable aspects
of "electro-chemical cold fusion"-- are now elegantly explained
by appropriate application of Maxwell’s original ideas.
Even more extraordinary: the recent startling demonstration,
broadcast nationwide on ABC’s "Good Morning America" last year
(click below image),
of a "physically impossible" major reduction -- in a few
minutes! -- of long-lived radioactive Uranium isotopes.
Normally, such processes require billions of years to
accomplish. This too is now elegantly explained by the
Hyperdimensional Model-- As -- an "induced hyperspatial stress,"
created by the machine ... the same stress that initially (in
the Model) induces "unstable isotopes" in the first place. By
technologically enhancing such vacuum stress within these
nuclei, via a retuning of Maxwell’s "scalar potentials," the
normal radioactive breakdown process is accelerated -- literally
billions of times ...
The implications for an entire "rapid, radioactive nuclear waste
reduction technology" -- accomplishing in hours what would
normally require aeons -- is merely one immediate, desperately
needed world-wide application of such "Hyperdimensional
Technologies."]
In our own planetary system, all the "giant" planets possess a
retinue of at least a dozen satellites: one or two major ones
(approximating the size of the planet Mercury) ... with several
others ranging down below the diameter and mass of our own Moon ...
in addition to a host of smaller objects; because of the "lever
effect" in the angular momentum calculations, even a small satellite
orbiting far away (or at a steep angle to the planet’s plane of
rotation) can exert a disproportional effect on the "total angular
momentum" equation -- just look at Pluto and the Sun.
Even now, Jupiter’s four major satellites (which have collective
masses approximately 1/10,000th of Jupiter itself), during the
course of their complex orbital interactions, are historically known
to cause time-altered behavior in a variety of well-known Jovian
phenomena..., i ncluding -- "anomalous" latitude and longitude motions of the
Great
Red Spot itself.
As we presented at the U.N. in 1992, the Great Red Spot -- a
mysterious vortex located for over 300 years at that "infamous"
19.5
degrees S. Latitude (click right image), via the circumscribed tetrahedral geometry of
the equally infamous "27 line problem" -- is the classic "hyperdimensional
signature" of HD physics operating within Jupiter.
The existence of decades of recorded "anomalous motions" of this
Spot, neatly synchronized with the highly predictable motions of
Jupiter’s own moons, are clearly NOT the result of conventional
"gravitational" or "tidal" interactions -- in view of the relatively
insignificant masses of the moons compared to Jupiter itself; but,
following Maxwell and Whittaker, the hyperdimensional effects of
these same moons -- via the long "lever" of angular momentum on the
constantly changing, vorticular scalar stress potentials inside
Jupiter -- that is a very different story ...
So, Hyperdimensional Test number three:
3) Look for small, short-term
amplitude-variations in the infrared emission levels of all the
giant planets ... synchronized (as are the still-mysterious
motions of the GRS on Jupiter) with the orbital motions and
conjunctions of their moons.
All NASA models for the "anomalous
energy emissions" of these planets have assumed a steady output; the
"snapshot" values derived from the mere few hours of Voyager fly-bys
in the 1980’s are now firmly listed in astronomy texts as new
"planetary constants"; the reason: the emissions are viewed by
NASA
as either "primordial heat," stored across the aeons; energy release
from internal long-term radioactive processes; or literal, slight
settling of portions of the entire planet, still releasing
gravitational potential energy ... all processes that will not
change perceptibly even in thousands of years!
Confirmed short-term variations in the current planetary IR (infra
red) outputs,
of "a few hours" (or even a few days) duration -- and synchronized
with the orbital periods of the planets’ satellites themselves --
would thus be stunning evidence that all the "mainstream"
explanations are in trouble ... and that the Hyperdimensional Model
deserves much closer scrutiny ...
In this same vein: unlike all "conventional NASA explanations," in a
phenomenon akin to "hyperdimensional astrology," the
HD model also
specifically predicts significantly larger, long-term variability in
these major planetary IR outputs ... of several years duration.
These (like the shorter variations triggered by the changing
geometry between the satellites) should be caused by the constantly
changing hyperdimensional (spatial stress) interactions between the
major planets themselves ... as they continually change their
geometry relative to one another, each orbiting the Sun with a
different relative velocity.
These changing interactive stresses in the "boundary between
hyperspace and real’ space" (in the Hyperdimensional Model) now also
seem to be the answer to the mysterious "storms" that, from time to
time, have suddenly appeared in the atmospheres of several of the
outer planets. The virtual "disappearance," in the late 80’s, of
Jupiter’s Great Red Spot is one remarkable example; Saturn’s abrupt
production of a major planetary "event," photographed by the Hubble
Space Telescope in 1994 (above image) as a brilliant cloud erupting at
19.5
degrees N. (where else?!), is yet another.
Since the prevailing NASA view is that these planets’ "excess" IR
output must be constant over time, no one has bothered to look for
any further correlations -- between a rising or falling internal
energy emission ... and the (now, historically well-documented)
semi-periodic eruptions of such "storms."
They should.
Go Back
|
