| 
			  
			  
			
			
  
			26 September 2015 from 
			RT Website
 
			
			
			Spanish version 
			  
			  
			  
			  
			
			 
			  
			  
			Fukushima's reactor No.2 could have suffered a complete meltdown 
			according to Japanese researchers.
 
			  
			They have been monitoring the 
			Daiichi nuclear power plant since April, but say they have found few 
			signs of nuclear fuel at the reactor's core. 
 The scientists from Nagoya University had been using a device that 
			uses elementary particles, which are called 
			
			muons. These are used to 
			give a better picture of the inside of the reactor as the levels of 
			radioactivity at the core mean it is impossible for any human to go 
			anywhere near it.
 
 However, the results have not been promising.
 
			  
			The study shows very 
			few signs of any nuclear fuel in reactor No. 2. This is in sharp 
			contrast to reactor No.5, where the fuel is clearly visible at the 
			core, the Japanese broadcaster NHK reports.
 The team believes that 70 to 100 percent of the fuel has melted, 
			though they did add that further research was needed to see whether 
			any fuel had managed to penetrate the reactor
 
 A report in May by the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO), which 
			is the plant's operator, said that a failure in reactor No.2's 
			pressure relief systems was one of the causes of the disaster.
 
			  
			The 
			team used a robot, which ventured into the building and measured 
			radiation levels at various places, while also studying how much 
			leakage had occurred from the control systems.
 
			  
			
			 
			
			
			Source 
			  
			
			TEPCO has used 16 robots to explore the crippled plant to date, from 
			military models to radiation-resistant multi-segmented snake-like 
			devices that can fit through a small pipe.
 
 However, even the toughest models are having trouble weathering the 
			deadly radiation levels: as one robot sent into reactor No.1 broke 
			down three hours into its planned 10-hour foray.
 
 Despite TEPCO's best efforts, the company has been accused of a 
			number of mishaps and a lack of proper contingency measures to deal 
			with the cleanup operation, after the power plant suffered a 
			meltdown, following an earthquake and subsequent tsunami in 2011.
 
 Recent flooding caused by Tropical Typhoon Etau swept 82 bags, 
			believed to contain contaminated materials that had been collected 
			from the crippled site, out to sea.
 
				
				"On September 9th and 11th, due to typhoon no.18 (Etau), 
				heavy rain caused Fukushima Daiichi K drainage rainwater to 
				overflow to the sea," TEPCO said in a statement, adding that the samples taken 
				"show 
			safe, low levels" of radiation.
 "From the sampling result of the 9th, TEPCO concluded that slightly 
			tainted rainwater had overflowed to the sea; however, the new 
			sampling measurement results show no impact to the ocean," it 
			continued.
 
			  
			
			 
			
			
			Source 
			  
			  
			A recent study (The 
			Fukushima Accident Was Preventable) by the University of Southern California said the 
			Fukushima disaster
			
			could have been prevented.  
			  
			One of the main faults 
			cited was the decision to install critical backup generators in 
			low-lying areas, as this was the first place the 2011 tsunami would 
			strike, following the massive earthquake.
 
			  
			  
			
			Backup generators are a key part of any nuclear power plant - they 
			are essential to cool the plant in the event of power loss, in order 
			to prevent a reactor meltdown.
 
			  
			
			These generators were the first to be 
			affected by the disaster, which the author describes as, 
				
				"a cascade of industrial, regulatory 
				and engineering failures." 
			Unable to cool itself, the Fukushima Daiichi power plant's reactors 
			fell like dominos.  
				
				"What doomed Fukushima Daiichi was the elevation 
			of the EDGs (emergency diesel generators)," the authors say. 
				 
			One 
			such generator was installed in the basement, while the others were 
			just 10 and 13 meters above sea level - an unacceptably low height, 
			according to 
			
			Costas Synolakis  (see
			
			The Fukushima Accident Was Preventable) of USC's Viterbi School of Engineering 
			in Turkey. 
			   
			 |