by Madison Ruppert
Editor
April 06, 2012
from
EndTheLie Website
Vladimir Putin
in 2009
(Image credit:
RIA-Novosti, Alexei Druzhinin, Pool)
Psychotronic weaponry is probably one of the least known and little
understood fields in military research, as it is truly something
which one would relegate to the realm of science fiction if they
were not aware of the facts behind it.
In fact, it is so poorly understood that even some journalists like
Sam Biddle of
Gizmodo and the
Australian Herald Sun show a
disturbing amount of ignorance on the subject.
Biddle seems to get confused by the fact that these weapons
reportedly have the capability to create physiological sensations
like burning (like the American
Active Denial System, also known as
a “heat ray” or “microwave gun,” which utilizes super high
frequencies).
Biddle exposes his ignorance by conflating the super high frequency
(SHF) used by the Active Denial System (ADS) with the low-frequency
waves used by psychotronic weapons.
I consider this somewhat like thinking a flame thrower and a .22
rifle are the same because they can both injure and kill people.
Both types of weapons use invisible waves and are far from
conventional weapons, but that is just about where the similarities
end.
These weapons, which were confirmed by none other than Vladimir
Putin, Russian President Elect, according to
the Herald Sun,
reportedly attack the central nervous system.
Here is another instance of Biddle being completely confused by this
technology, which is a bit surprising and disconcerting seeing as he
works for a technology blog.
The ADS activates the water molecules on the skin like a microwave,
thus creating the sensation of heat. However, if reports are
correct, the Russian weapon targets the central nervous system,
which is an entirely different mechanism.
While they both obviously use electromagnetic radiation, one targets
the water in epidermal cells while the other reportedly goes
straight to the target’s central nervous system (how exactly this is
done is unclear at this point).
In fact, these weapons are far from new, as Nick Begich heavily
documents in his book
Earth Rising: The Revolution, Toward a
Thousand Years of Peace.
Thankfully, the Herald Sun points this out in writing,
“Research
into electromagnetic weapons has been carried out in the US and
Russia since the ’50s.”
It was reported that the plans to introduce the so-called
super-weapons were announced by Anatoly Serdyukov, the Russian
Defense Minister.
However, I have been unable to find media reports confirming this
statement, other than the report which has been copied word-for-word
across the internet, including the Herald Sun and
News.com.au.
There also seems to be confusion about where some of the quotes
originated, as the article which has been so widely published
attributes a quote to a “Mr Tsyganok” who is never properly
identified.
“When it was used for dispersing a
crowd and it was focused on a man, his body temperature went up
immediately as if he was thrown into a hot frying pan,” they
claim he said.
I believe that the “Mr Tsyganok” they
cite is actually Anatoly Tsyganok, the head of the Military
Forecasting Center in Moscow.
The full quote, according to the
British Daily Mail, is,
“When it was used for dispersing a
crowd and it was focused on a man, his body temperature went up
immediately as if he was thrown into a hot frying pan. Still, we
know very little about this weapon and even special forces guys
can hardly cope with it.”
Unnamed sources claim that Putin
described the weapons as,
“entirely new instruments for
achieving political and strategic goals.”
Another quite damning quote, allegedly
from Putin (which, I honestly doubt is accurate since saying such a
thing would be quite damaging), reads,
“Such high-tech weapons systems will
be comparable in effect to nuclear weapons, but will be more
acceptable in terms of political and military ideology.”
It’s hardly politically savvy to compare
a weapon to nuclear weapons then say that it is acceptable for use.
In fact, even mentioning that your country has such capabilities
would be far from intelligent from a political standpoint.
“This is a serious weapon,” Tsyganok
added, reinforcing the fact that it makes no sense for the
Russians to publicly promote such a weapon, unless they were
doing so as a deterrent of some kind.
The problem I see with this entire story
is that the Daily Mail and others have used it as a chance to claim
that Putin would use it against Russian dissidents, even though
there is absolutely nothing to back up the claims.
The Daily Mail’s headline, “Putin targets foes with ‘zombie’ gun
which attack victims’ central nervous system” emphasizes just that.
Furthermore, it is worth pointing out that the Russian Ministry of
Defense refused to comment on the matter, which makes little sense
if Serdyukov indeed announced that they were planning to introduce
the weapons.
However, there are indeed bits of information indicating that Russia
is already using the weaponry. Aside from the many pieces of
information which point to Russian research in the area going back
decades, which Begich and others have thoroughly documented, the
case of Sergei Serykh indicates that they may be in use already.
Sergei or Serguei Serykh was a Russian asylum seeker in the United
Kingdom, along with his wife Tatiana and his stepson.
All three of them died, allegedly by
committing suicide, on March 7,
2010 when they fell from the Red Road flats in Glasgow, Scotland.
There are
conflicting reports that Serykh was a former agent of the
FSB, also known as the KGB, while others say he was with Russia’s
foreign intelligence agency, the GRU.
The Daily Mail claims that he spoke of a psychotronic weapons
program to the MI6, although I cannot locate any corroborating
reports.
Furthermore, they claim that he said he was a victim of these
weapons, which he said were,
“many times more powerful than in
the Matrix films.”
Once again, all I can find are copies of
the article, not other reports which back this purported quote up.
The case of Serykh is quite mysterious, but what is certain is that
this weaponry has been in development for a long time and it would
be foolish to think that the Russians were not actively pursuing
this route.
However, I seriously doubt that Putin or other Russian politicians
would want to expose such a thing to the international press,
especially at a time when the West seems increasingly antagonistic
towards the former Soviet state.
|