Philadelphia Experiment
(Rainbow Project): see
Montauk (Phoenix) Project
“Pleiadeans”:
Collective
designation for a heterogeneity of “channeled” sources all of
which, by the very employment of this particular term, display a
common desire to ingratiate themselves with their audience as
the “good guys”. This seems to be the only thing such sources
share in common. The worst of the lot has to be the
Ashtar/Hatton
communication (qv), discharging through a rapid-rotation roster
of chewed-and-thrown-away channels since the ‘50s.
Rather than
explain why these self-contradictory wolves clothed with
kneejerk pietisms earn the Channeled Wretchedness Award (or CWRAW, as in “to stick in the...”), let’s simply say that, in
the Ashtar case, if these communications aren’t self-evidently a
brand of snakeoil pandering to the frail-ego factor of their
typical target audience, well then perhaps you are just the
glorious Light Worker they’re looking for.
The
Meier Pleiadeans, in comparison,
appear better on first introduction—again, until you begin to
read what they actually have to communicate to and through
Meier, who isn’t really a “channel” so much as an easy
pickup...
Those of the readership boasting a faculty of
assessment no more prodigious than that of “common sense”, may
find many a reason on that front alone to question either the
veracity, intent, powers of translation or the simple
intelligence of these flying Meier-onies; those with subtler
facility in assessing the esoterica of such subjects as they
profess to expound, are sure to have reason for rapid recourse
to “coitus interruptus” with respect to these beguilingly-comely
versions of the Pleiadeans Peracletus.
(Fred Bell claims to be a
“contacteé" channeler of the same Pleiadean forces linked with Meier, though the latter have professed sole troth to Billy.
However, disregarding the Meier-Pleiadean disclaimer [since then
whole veracity-quotient is exactly what is in question to begin
with], and assessing Bell’s claim solely by comparison of the
respective content-values in the presentations of each, we may
reasonably side with Fred on this one and acknowledge a general
similitude of quality from source to source, suggesting that
indeed there’s more than one for whom They Toll—and how
fortunate we all are, as beneficiaries of this badinage from
both continents!)
The Marciniak (qv)
Pleiadeans or the
Flying Fatuosi as they’re affectionately known to Southern
Crown, are in many respects the most eloquent of an ineloquent
breed.
Their “rap” is rather different from
the others, and they strain it through a vocal wha-wha that does
nothing if not bid for attention; nor do they seem particularly
pernicious in any given area—but they’re hopelessly
dysfunctional, rather as absurd as Meier’s missionaries, when
addressing the Natives as to how best to go around improving
their backward and savage lot.
We find for example that, as
exponents of the “You Create Your Own Reality” canard (qv. YCYOR,
not “canard”) they enwrap their enraptured audience with exactly
the rap we’ve all been waiting to hear:
“If it looks like it is
too much work, something is telling you it is not the way.”
Bringers of the Dawn, p. 122.
If that isn’t plain enough, they
give formal instruction on achieving Everything-You-Ever-Wanted
without so much as a token appearance from “the sweat of thy
brow”:
“Say to yourself, ‘I am effortlessly intending that this
come about.’” op. cit, p. 123.
All one need say in response to
something like this is: “try it”. Formulate, decree, forget
about it.
We’re willing to wager that, if your new age
command-to-the-cosmos was something on the order of “air shall
be supplied through my nostrils in the next few moments”, why,
you’ve no doubt experienced an unexpected miracle approaching
100% achievement-probability. If however your command was
something on the order of “I will receive a million dollars
deposited to my account in the next couple days”, we confidently
predict the probability-curve has precipitously plunged to nil.
So where’s the Amazing Randi when you really need him? (For a
closer philosophical inspection of these “ideas”, see
The Big Spin.)
Back to Las Pleyades
Pleroma:
Ancient gnostic
term, associated with the Simoneans but not originating with
Simon Magus (qv), meaning a universal value or state of
resolution. It is commonly interpreted by occultists to mean a
type of ultimate oblivion or mutually cancelling vacuum, like
conventional notions of “nirvana”. As revived to its original
Simonean meaning by Southern Crown, “pleroma” signifies the
common denominator of universal resolution figuring
mathematically as One and spiritually as Zero, which is not
however a state of oblivion or simple blankness but a plenum
intensity of Void-being, “collapsing” either to a Line (the
susumna, physically the cerebrospinal channel) or a point (the
Coordinate point or causal radix of the “heart”) but in either
case never necessarily erasing the terms of manifestation but
rather reconciling and uniting their poles in an
underlying/pre-existent Unity.
Prana: geometrized
energy-patterns coded into and informing the etheric-physical
field, the astral-etheric field, the astral and mental fields
etc. “Prana” is the generic Hindu term, used here in preference
of others owing to its familiarity even in the West,
corresponding roughly to what has otherwise been known as vril,
orgone, wakkan, od or odic force, azoth,
subtle energy and
magnetic fluid; depending on the given plane, state or density
in which the prana occurs, it may take on various forms and
serve differing functions according to ideotypal, psychic,
psycho-emotional or vital requirements. It is not the same as
the ether but encodes infrastructure patterns of ether, which,
according to “angle-of-propagation” and overall waveform of the
latter tend to align, organize and preferentially orient the
geometric sub-components of enfolded prana-stetes (thus
exfolding them with reference to the guiding ideotype of the
cognitive grid network imparting etheric “angle” in the first
place).
Through the resultant guideline of
perspectival coordinates they “migrate” to strategic ontological
“positions” undergirding stress-tensor states of subatomic field
patterns and magnetogravitic, phase-space topologies. Snchpranic
infrastructures are themselves without “size” or “physical”
position (i.e. with respect to atomic coordinates to the limits
of indeterminacy) though their ontological “angles” and “edges”
orient relative size and respective position of point-fields by
gauge adjustments according to compensatory symmetries required
of the—given—perspective. The pranic patterns themselves are
reiterative and holonomic. Therefore while they may “appear” to
reside strictly “within” the coordinative limits of the overall
field geometry (as with E8 x E8 gauge groups) either when
evidentially reconstituted or occultly “perceived”, they are
arbitrarily “expansive” to an indeterminate degree and range
beyond those apparent micro-boundaries.
Qabala:
Literally “Received”.
Esoteric teaching associated with Hebrew mysticism but not
exclusive to Jewish custody (there is a non-Hebrew “universal” Qabalism and even a “Christian” Qabalism etc., all nonetheless
based on the primary Hebrew/Chaldean letter-number
correspondences and basic Sephirothic symbols).
In Renaissance times, the Qabalists
became known as “they who Know Grace”—obviously making MT, by
that fact alone, the premier Qabalist since he “knows Grace”
perfectly well.
The Table of Correspondences principally used in the Southern
Crown Teaching (derived basically from the turn-of-the-century
Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn) is given here, as well as in
“Motto in the Lotto”.
Shakespeare, William:
Pseudonym of the Mahachohan,
European Renaissance Era. Other such pseudonyms were
“Christopher Marlowe”, “Valentine Andrea” (from “Verulam” and
“Albans”) author of the Rosicrucian Manifestos the
Fama
Fraternitatis and Confessio Fraternitatis, “Geoffrey Whitney”
and “Cyd Hamet Benengeli” (“Cid” meaning Lord, “Hamet” referring
either to “Hamlet” or “Dashiell Hammett”, leaving it to the
discretion of the reader as to which, and “Ben Engeli” meaning
Son of England.)
The first part of Book Two, Chapter
One of The History of Don Quixote of the Mancha states plainly:
“The history of Don Quixote of the Mancha written by
Cyd Hamet
Benengeli, an Arabical Historiographer.”
Second Part, Chapter Two:
“Well,
said Sancho, I will tell you..that the author’s name of this
History is Cid Hamet Beregena.”
“Sancho, said Don Quixote, you
are out in the Moor’s surname, which is Cid Hamet Benengeli, and
Cid in the Arabic signifieth Lord.”
Lord Bacon, Son of England
Yours Truly. See The MotherBookfor full exposition of the
“Shakespere Illusion”.
Note by Hebrew Qabala (and Hebrew figures into this, as “Ben” is
Hebrew for “Son”) Cyd Hamet Benengeli equals 628. In 777 we find
628 is the value of Light, A:V:R: spelled in full with Vau as
VA. When Vau is figured as VV, A:V:R: or Light = 633. 633 plus
33 (Bacon’s simple numerological signature in the old English
alphabet of 24 letters, from which the Masonic 33 degrees
derives) = 666, the number of the magical Square of Tiphereth,
the Son or Sun on the Tree of Life. The “Son of England” is the
Light or Sun of England.
Note also that the first value of
Light/Cyd Hamet Benengeli, 628, is 38 less than 666. 38 is the
value of ChL, to “fall”, and also “to wait”. (See Bacon
biographies.) But “to wait” is also ChKH, value 33, meaning
“angle” or “fishhook” as well. Fishhook is the symbol ascribed
to Tzaddi, which Thelemites will identify immediately as
figuring prominently into proofs of Liber Al, the Book of the
Law (qv). For full exposition of these deliberate encoded
connections see The Mother Book.
Simon Magus:
Name of
Samaritan manifestation of the Mahachohan (qv), contemporary of
the eponymous founder of “Christianity”. Third incarnation of
the One Personality of the present world period. By Justinus
Martyr, Irenaeus and the Clementine Recognitions, amongst many
other pietists, voted the Premier Heretic and Antichrist.
Founder of Gnosticism. (See
Mahachohan.)
Rueckert, Carla:
Along with
Elkins and McCarty, the channeler of
the Rα material. Carla is
included here as exception proving the rule re “channeling” (qv).
Her account of the process by which the LL Research group
conducted the “Ra workings” (in Channeler’s Handbook, see MT
review of same) should be used as a standard with which to
evaluate the quotient of occult care surrounding every other
instance of channeling.
In comparison one will find
virtually all other channelings—with exception of Roberts’
Seth
material—to have been conducted under conditions no better than
for those of turn of the century seance or tabletapping, and to
have been undertaken initially under no less frivolous
inspiration (see the hilarious account of
J.Z. Knight’s
“epiphany” that kicked off the “Ramtha” channelings; this
furnishes a yardstick for fatuity as sublime in its way as the
Ra “workings” are models of meritoriousness).
With this sole exception of the
LL Research group and Rueckert
as key channeler, one may obtain an otherwise hard to obtain
idea of what’s really involved in such new age “pastimes”. Owing
to the intelligence and care with which the contact was made
(and meticulously sustained) till its critical impasse, the
material issuing therefrom is uncommonly elevated, uniquely
reflects a 6th density source and has earned Carla the Southern
Crown honor of “all time greatest channeler”.
Unlike the flippant atmosphere
surrounding most other channelings, the entire “Ra” ambience
comports a critical edge commensurate with the critical
character of the communication; it’s from this source primarily,
after all, that we learn of the Negative hierarchy and of
the
Orion presence which otherwise is beautified, rationalized,
denied or left languishing in the abandoned scaffolding of
extant theosophical volumes. All “new age” knowledge of the
Negative hierarchy owes its (largely unacknowledged) debt to
this single Source; and aside from private (student initiate)
Southern Crown material predating publication of the Ra
workings, no authentic Word or initiated insight into such
themes has substantially dented the virgin seal of new age souls
too delicate in dreams of light ever to conceive such
unpleasantness on their own.
As tangible result of the subtle
(and indeed, perilous) character clinging to Events in the Rα
channeling, Carla’s health and even life has remained
continuously in jeopardy. (Episodes in the material itself
recount actual attacks from the Orions upon Carla’s exteriorized
soul body etc.) Owing to Carla’s particular spiritual
orientation necessarily brought to bear as an element to be
integrated into the ritual of elements required for balances in
the Rα working (to wit, her devoutly Christian orientation) a
psychological factor tilting tendency toward “martyrdom” entered
in augmentation of the general skein of complications wound
‘round such attacks, serving overall to impart additional
susceptibility to the “Orion Crusaders’” Bad Intentions.
(Lest anyone suppose this
observation lists to the left of “personal interpretation”, it’s
co signed by Carla herself with reference to the very title of a
wow channeled book early issued by LL Research, i.e.
The
Crucifixion of Esmeralda Sweetwater.)
Indeed so moribund and “martyred”
did her condition become at one point in the late’ 80s that MT,
actually fearing for her life, undertook a radical long distance
initiatory therapy in which, by subjecting Carla to an
uninterrupted stream of abuse, ridicule, mockery and
denigration, he sought to shock her out of her all but
imperceptible fading away, in ignition of her latently righteous
indignation thereby driving the squatters rights demons straight
out of her. And, since “God hath no fury” like a sweet Southern
Belle who believes her honor’s been besmirched, Carla reports
she’s feeling better now.
Southern Crown:
Official name of Initiatory Group/Mystery
School of which AAA/MT are the presiding Adepti. The name
derives from the constellation Corona Australis (Südliche Krone)
located near the Archer’s waist on the Milky Way’s edge. The
constellation name seems to come from a reference of Germanicus
in Phainomena where he speaks of the Corona sine honore, a
comparison to the Northern Crown having a contrastively great
tradition behind it. Gratius adds that ancient authors knew it
as the Centaur’s Crown (centaurs having been depicted as wearing
starry crowns).
Classic poets refer to it as
Bacchus’ Crown, lyricizing the Reveler/Revealer had thrust it
into the heavens on behalf of Semele, his Mother. Owing to its
radiatory configuration, it’s often associated with the Bunch of
Arrows emanating from the Archer’s hand; in this connection it
suggests a wheel, and therefore is also known as Rota Ixionis (Ixion
was associated with the centaur Pholos). The Arabs knew it as Al Kubbah, literally “the Tortoise” (by which it’s also known to
the Chinese) but with a secondary meaning of Woman’s Tent or
“traveling apartment”; thus it is Al Hiba, the Tent, and
Al Udha
al Na‘am, the Ostrich’s Nest (referring to what’s now the
nearby Eagle).
It is also Al Fakkah, The Dish. For the significance of
“Tortoise” etc. see The Mother Book. The reference to the Mother
in “Semele” and the “Woman’s Tent” is plain. Also this “tent”,
being a “traveling apartment”, irresistibly suggests a motel; MT
is an acceptable abbreviation for Motel, which latter frequently
sport “the best” or AAA rating. MT was born in San Luis Obispo,
birthplace of the motel.
The Nest/Eagle association is plainly appropriate to the Order’s
symbolism as origin of the Mother current. The Name particularly
suits the initiatory order of Southern Crown since it’s less
conspicuous than its “Northern counterpart” (“without honor”,
i.e. largely uncelebrated), yet it’s assigned 49 stars (7x7)
thus far outnumbering those attributed to Corona Borealis. Its
association with Sagittarius is apt, since the Order of Southern
Crown was founded exactly a year to the day before the planetoid
Chiron was discovered; in that earlier year and on that day
MT
received a single, distinct Inner verbal communication
enunciating the very name Chiron.
Researching it, the first mention of
Chiron he encountered was in a book by Jung, where the spelling
was rendered Chieron; (it’s seldom if ever rendered this way, as
he subsequently found). Doing a Greek Qabala on the name based
on the above spelling, he arrived at a particular formula which
is also the exact number of the visible subdivisions or “tiles”
on the Cube Cephas. On this Magickal Formula, the Order of
Southern Crown was founded.
Spacetime/Timespace
(excerpted from “Channeling, UFOs and
the Positive/Negative Realms Beyond This World”, Through the
Looking Glass, the Time/Space of Our Space/Time):
...it’s
necessary to note the distinction which Ra makes between the
orders of space/time and of time/space (all the densities from
Ra’s Perspective downward are organized in these complementary
ways). Although
the Rα material doesn’t detail the significance
of these organizations beyond certain preliminary points, they
are cited as categories of consideration because of what they
necessarily imply.
We may understand “space/time”, first of all, in the terms we’re
familiar with. We occupy the system of our space/time as a
vehicle, (or axial, mind body locus) through which the
coordinates of that system necessarily arrange all features
according to the requirements of situationality. We’re located,
vehicularly, at and as a particular juncture of time and space,
so that values of “near” and “far” acquire functional
importance. In this context, our limitations are our
opportunities; what’s filtered through the bottleneck of
space/time becomes the focus of our concern, and the material of
our resourcefulness in operating through finitizing faculties.
Because our condition is one of centrist perspective and
therefore discriminative navigation, the order of space/time
comprises the context in which progress is possible through
situational doing. We learn by acting through defining
conditions, from which an order of consequence develops whereby
to gauge all Adjustment.
We may have heard that at death the limits of the localized body
dissolve, and we move through a lighter material into
conjunction with a display of space and time that’s
comparatively plastic. It’s here that, in the unity of a
presiding Light, we may review all the features belonging to our
personal past without regard for the usual measure of sequence,
or apportionment of priorities.
Everything appears equally available, in the manner of a deck of
cards fanned out in panoramic display or as simultaneous images
shining in a reflective flotilla of bubbles. Here there is no
“rootedness” at an enclosing, defining space/time juncture
similar to that which was experienced in physical life. The
“vehicle” (or axial locus) of the mind body being which may be
identified as operating in the new state, gives no impression of
imploding on a contained self sense but rather has more the
feeling of an acceleration constantly surpassing itself,
expanding through Space of starry nerve clusters in a range
embracing the soul record to the finest part of the life last
lived. This is the complementary field of time/space belonging
to the inker planes of 3rd density existence. The ticks of time
are indeed spatially exhibited, in a kind of interior hall of
records where a life review may be conducted and all the
“masked” elements unveiled for a kind of global consideration.
This is an interval in the pattern of soul progression, usually
conducted as a kind of protracted sleep and dreamstate wherein
experience may be assimilated, distilled, and the various steps
of “dissociation” rehearsed whereby the heart is ferried—on the
implacable subconscious current—through the underworld ordeal of
a purifying dis-identification from every attachment and
lingering fixation of form—summing in the Amenta of the psyche’s
recuperative rest what must eventually take place as a
volitional work of conscious understanding in the context of
space/time limit.
This time/space framework of the inner planes is inferentially
sealed up, self enclosed for purposes of such soul examination;
for here the most important determinations must be made as to
what the soul has within it, and this process necessarily goes
on without disturbance. Such a state is a kind of clearinghouse
for the assignation of souls, each according to the quality
distilled in the process of “becoming” the sum total of what,
viewed in the complementary space/time frame, is spread out
piecemeal as a sequentially shifting pattern.
From this time/space antechamber,
where the soul aligns progressively with the non local character
of compositional coordinates subtending all “local” clusters of
physical existence, the distillate of psychic focus comprising
the latent personality expression may be transferred to the
space/time framework most consistent with its net value; these
worlds of space/time organization may indeed, beyond the admixed
education of 3rd density, polarize to the emphatically positive
or decisively negative. The complementary time/space frameworks
of the “inner planes” of each succeeding density, function very
much on the same principle of review, analysis, attunement,
adjustment according to sum volitional inclination, and further
assignment of space/time fields in which the relative
“localization” of vehicularized consciousness furnishes
conditions of real, developmental furtherance and learning.
The “division” between the
contractile, self enfolded space/time vehicle and its expansive
(self surpassing) time/space counterpart seems much more
solid/impermeable in 3rd density framework owing to the general
screening device of that realm, in which the interior order of
things is specifically rotated at mutually filtering angles to
the physical field of expression. It’s for this reason there’s
no direct knowledge of or recognition re an “afterlife”, for the
most part, at the 3rd stage level of consciousness—all such
matters being confined to speculation, rumor and culturally
modified myth. In the higher densities the “division” between
given space/time and time/space organizations at each level is
less severe; there’s a permeability between the two orders in
the higher densities, greater or lesser depending on refinement
of the density.
Each higher density has a space/time
framework wherein the soul “contractually” aligns with a nest of
embodying vehicles, through which the compound focal patterns of
specific level identification produce an incarnating eversion of
the currents organizing the locus of cross correlation and
perceptual synthesis. This “invagination” of participating
planes of the current field (through ideoform lockin of the
focal coordinate line) fixes the streams of multidimensional/patterning geometries into a stabilizing structural hold,
concentrating a coherent convergence of space/time “points” so
as to formulate a real position of true situationality.
The process is much the same
throughout the densities. The extreme turning inside out
comprising the physical 3rd density frame of focus is
represented in familiar terms by the polarized lock-in of
kundalini, the energy coils of which seem to settle the
multidimensional twists of composing current fields in inverse
order of descent around each other; this in effect nucleates the
subtle, radiant psychic ethers reflecting the given (operative)
Typologies so that mind and idea seem to occupy a position of
faint interiority with respect to the fixed “physical” envelope
of structural consistency and inertial repetition, into which
those psychic coordinates are aligned. In the condition of 4th
density, such incarnative focal lockin formulates a functional
specification of time and place in the same general manner,
producing a kind of “materialization” of the Astral field into a
similar situational centrism.
There exists the same type of
vehicular contingency which makes “travel” in the Astral 4th
density fields of space/time a matter of actual space ships
(albeit of the biomechanical type described in last month’s
issue, consistent with the psychic level at which materia is
generally organized in such a framework); whereas we’re
familiar, if only by hearsay, with the flotational mode wholly
free of any mechanical vehicular requirement in the context of
Astral or inner plane, 3rd density time/space frameworks.
This accounts for the apparent
discrepancy, i.e. the difference between what we hear in terms
of the “Robert Monroe” style of inner plane astral travel
conducted strictly in the soul vehicle, and those reports of
astral like entities certainly functioning from the plane of a
“psychic” milieu nonetheless requiring physical/mechanical
vehicles of some type to convey them from place to place: the
non mechanical flights of astral transport through unencumbered
agency of the soul vehicle in general belong to orders of
time/space, which have a specific and very different function
from space/time in any given density; conversely, those modes of
travel through astral, astral etheric or etheric physical fields
manifestly requiring a kind of mechanical or “hardware” vehicle,
belong to space/time orders of organization. Either type of
vehicle, proceeding from space/time or time/space frameworks,
may intrude upon familiar space/time physical reality.
In the higher densities the frameworks of space/time and
time/space are equally discrete, since they serve separate
purposes; yet the more translucent modes of organization
belonging to those densities allow a permeability which makes
the fields and informing patterns of time/space more readily
accessible to the vehicularized “localism” of incarnative,
space/time agency. Thus to 4th density “embodied” entities, the
whole history of a life system is akashically available even
though in practical terms they’re functioning at a particular
cross section in the span of that history. Similarly, in 5th
density the totality of cosmic patterns comprising the
infrastructure of all times and places is theoretically
available, even though the “incarnative” pattern of the
particular space/time agent functions from the perspective of a
situational locus immediately responsive to certain worlds,
space/time frames and patterns.
In every case, the juncture of “meeting” between the Positive
and Negative realms and/or the Positive and Negative Beings is
generally reserved for the space/time frameworks of any given
density, since the lime/space frames (serving another function)
are largely self sealed as the soul’s “isolation tank”, where it
may take stock—as it were—of the potential moves of further
progress through its chosen polarity.
This accounts for some of the channeled information we receive
to the effect that the Negative is just a chimera, a “projection
of our own subconscious fears and primal doubts” etc.; the other
sources of such information are Negative propaganda, proceeding
from the Negative planes themselves.
Valerian, Val:
Gargantuan
like editor/author for the alternative information periodical
Leading Edge, the groundbreaking
Matrix volumes etc. In the year
of Our Lord ‘93, said to have suffered mightily under Puntious
Pilate, was crucified by the Mahachohan on the Mount of
Microprosopus (called “the Impatient Face”), and Arose in 12
months carrying in tact the Sacred Tablets of Malak Ta’us (qv).
One Gospel account claims that on this Occasion he was heard to
mutter beneath his breath: “Nevermore; I swear, nevermore”.
“You Create Your Own Reality”:
Tertiary distortion of the Free
will factor in the Law of Confusion (see
Rα
material)—characteristic expression and philosophical
promulgation of a certain life wave type, having no single group
composition but a general membership identity across various
star fields, galaxies, planes, dimensions, densities and degrees
of space and time; does not indicate “positive” or “negative”
identity of the communicant giving rise to the expression in any
given case.
YCYOR has become the provisional new age shibboleth, owing to
the extent to which extradimensional and celestial intelligences
committed to its ideals and implications have concentrated a
collective focus into this zone of the space-time continuum
during Earth transition to 4th density.
Understanding the reason for such “synchronous” convergence of
emissaries with emphasis on this particular type from far flung
regions both of space and time, depends on an understanding of
the spiritual time axis (see essay III of
T Bird Meets The
Phoenix). Along the spiritual time axis, coordination is evinced
not in linear mechanical terms of uniform clock measurement but
in qualitative congruencies of comparative states.
Thus we may
envision a multidimensional universe of “wheels within wheels”,
that is cycles within Cycles, and though a given epicycle may be
merely a minute fraction of the parent Cycle in terms of
temporal “duration” on the quantitative plane, the only factor
of significance on the qualitative axis of spiritual development
is the respective stage in the rotating parallelisms of the
cycles.
Therefore, that which makes two “moments” in space and
time compatible in terms of communication and intercourse isn’t
their “physical propinquity” (a very relative and plastic
measure) but coincidence in cycles.
Regardless, then, whether an extra
galactic civilization is aeons in our “past” or light years in
our “future” judged by “local” laws of the lightcone, its
availability to us (and us to it) depends on the stage or degree
of cycle through which each is respectively passing. The
transition stage between 4th and 5th densities taking place in
an extragalactic civilization comparatively in our “future”, is
much more “propinquitous” or smoothly adjacent to our present
state and condition of being since by synchrony we’re passing
through a connate phase of our own “lesser” cycle, i.e. passing
between 3rd and 4th density.
It’s therefore the synchrony in
cyclic time which sees these otherwise far-flung civilizations
and emissaries of “remote” galactic regions right at our
doorstep, all—apparently—so “suddenly” interested in us and what
“we” as a planetary populace are up to, as if boatloads from
virtually every country around the world were suddenly to appear
on U.S. shores without prior conference, spontaneously
“interested” from each individual angle in what those wild
Americans were doing.
Thus the general strength or comparative constitutional “titre”
of those beings bearing standards of YCYOR converging upon this
Transitional time and place, is attributable to the common
circumstance that each is at the “moment” of his own
transitional phase and finds something of mutual interest
(relative to his own respective transit) at this 3rd density
Earth locus.
(We therefore needn’t presume some
strange “simultaneity” of behaviors on the part of virtually
every being in the spacetime spectrum; as with Einsteinian
physics in the “local” case, “simultaneity” is a relative
concept depending on the coordinative framework. In this case
the coordinate framework doesn’t depend on the quantitative
propagation of lightsignals, but rather on the congruency or
typal harmony of phase.
Thus each planetary or star-being whom
we may find “presently” converging, by some simultaneity of
impulse, upon our planetary doorstep, has in his own framework
passed through a measure of “time” perfectly indigenous to
native requirements for which any other framework would be
comparatively remote and confined to its own concerns; each in
his own “temporal” context eventually arrives at a transition
state between the present density-of-being and the next.
This transition-state itself is the
factor automatically coupling him by resonant synchrony to that
connate phase in the respective cycles through which all other
entities [regardless spacetime location or density-degree] must
pass. It’s not necessary to contemplate some fantastic
“acceleration” or “slowing up” of respective cycles to get them
to coincide or “agree” with one particular framework such as
“ours”; each coincides perfectly, by virtue of commonality or
similitude of phase, regardless how “long” or “short” the
respective times each endured toward the transitional moment.)
This explained, we may understand
the presence of a peculiar preponderance of professed “reality
creators” at our doorstep as function of this qualitative
congruence. Since the operative factor is qualitative, we must
ask what psychic correspondence exists between our
consciousness-type and the type drawn to us, that so many should
find their phasic jump to the next-highest density somehow
concerned with a factor to be found here, at the lowest
density-transition belonging to self-reflective consciousness
altogether, and technically behind them—i.e. in their relative
“past”—while at the same time “coincidentally” brandishing the
same philosophical Flag regardless the “positive” or “negative”
background, the spatioternporal distances separating them, the
“current” density level respectively occupied etc.
Indeed, contemplating this single question gives the game away.
Why all such “civilizations” or social/memory/complexes would
beam au rebours toward us in concentrated tutelage while
ostensibly seeking a forward advance upon their own next-highest
density, is easily understood in noting that any such “higher
density” beings must necessarily be—in some sense—our “own”
future selves, or probable versions of what “we” are careering
toward becoming.
They “return” to us in absorptive contemplation
at the brink of their own phasic transition, much in the way we
study our own psychic background and key episodes in our past
(on the “psychiatric couch” or otherwise) when assaying a
forward move out of a current psychological impasse. This infers
that all such beings are in some way at a psychological (i.e.
mind/body) impasse, and are “returning” here to 3rd density and
our transition-point as by compulsion.
Just as those who obsessively brood
over their past (in the implicit hopes of “breaking through” the
blockage felt to have formed there) tend to bring with them on
that psychic forage all the same bag and baggage originally
packed “back then” and lugged thereafter, so the “spacebrothers”
and entities from far-flung “futures” of higher density life
return to this their “past” 3rd-density juncture—literally or by
satisfactory correspondence— inevitably bearing the load of what
burdens their own pending transition; and they bring it with
them in much the same way the psychological self-examiner
obsessively clings to the a posteriori impactions he’s
determined to undo.
Just as the psychiatric patient is
grossly identified with the very features undergirding his
neurosis, so the backtracking spacebeings are grossly identified
with the props supporting their own problems of transition.
Indeed just as the subcon-sciousness of those continuing knots
in the psychiatric case supply the type of difficulty confronted
by 3rd-stage psyche in its desire to progress and transcend, so
the necessary consciousness of the concepts germane to the
higher-density states furnishes a resistance-factor enormous in
its own way for those seeking synchronous progress on the
succeeding turn of the cosmic cycle.
The degree of self-conscious
consolidation as which such entities have introjected—and lived
by—the philosophic formulation summed in YCYOR, imparts its own
quality of persuasion only secured all-the-more owing to the
extent to which it preempts the value of Identity. It has to be
understood that, emanating from higher-dimensional consciousness
some such statement as YCYOR isn’t just a theory to be tested or
applied; it’s a proclamation of Who They Are. Such proclamation
carries psychic weight, owing to the fact that its relative
“truth value” is formulated at densities-of-being bearing some
necessarily-direct relation to essential cosmic principles and
values.
This is indeed why we insist, in our
various critiques of YCYOR (see Bashar Book Review etc.) that
the implicit if subliminal “appeal” of such a shibboleth has to
do with its emanation from some tangent-to-Being forming more
acute angle to the Conscious Axis than that ordinarily styled at
the 3rd-stage level. Its original forging in more focused Light
of Consciousness gives it a “quasi-validity”, apparently
accounting for and co-opting the assistance of certain essential
principles-of-being—up to a point. It is of course that limiting
“point” which has been reached, by the forms of consciousness
from which we hear and who strain to link the sum momentum of
our motion to their own.
As with the tenacity of the ordinary
psychic complex, then, the collective “effort” of the
space-beings (regardless individual motives or orientations) is
that of bringing to bear all the force of the problematic
conclusion itself upon those “past” events having given rise to
it in the first place, as if to persuade such events to take
their formative point of departure more seriously at the
outset—indeed to furnish the participants in such events a less
ambiguous, more forcefully-formulated and emphatic model to begin
with so as to “cut to the chase”, delete the amount of time
“originally” required to consolidate the position and so
streamline its entry into the 4th-density phase, thus
inferentially imparting that much more momentum of initial
consolidation to their own coupled phase-transition (i.e. to
5th, as in the Sassani case, 5th and 6th in the case of the Pleiadeans etc.).
We may now see why they all apparently come “here” (i.e. why
there’s such a preponderant proportion in the representation of
YCYOR to the face of this plane, a circumstance which is naively
taken to bespeak the authenticity of the idea itself—as if mere
“consensus” in the higher-density frameworks were any more
reason to embrace some notion than it is here). This
preponderant proportion of YCYOR proponents is precisely a
mirroring effect demonstrating the half truth or
“quasi-validity” of the principle itself. If it’s a mirroring
effect, this obviously means we’re having mirrored back to us,
in amplified and developed form, some seed-tendency we’re
“presently” manifesting.
These beings and their ideas are
reflections of what “we” might become, a probable version or
versions of some nascent direction we’re collectively imparting
to our current momentum. By the same token, the fact we may now
clearly identify the problematic character of the “inspiration”
bringing them collectively here from their respective
backgrounds, shows us why this mirroring effect is only
manifestation of a half truth, not the exemplification of its
ultimate superiority.
While it’s true they mirror some present tendency of ours and
were attracted here for precisely that reason, it’s also evident
they manifest such “tendency” to us from an Angle that suffers
some deficiency. (The Pleiadeans of Marciniak proclaim they’re
here precisely to try to change the “future” from which they
come wherein they’re renegades to a totalitarian empire; the
Sassani of “Bashar” overtly try to induce us to endure our
space-alien abduction by their grey cousins, and even to like it,
for the implicit purpose of promoting their own
density-maximization as “future” products of the cross-breed.)
Therefore it’s only-too-apparent
they don’t come from a “reality they’ve created”, to show us how
to do likewise.
Marciniak’s Reality Creating Pleiadeans are
manifestly bracketed by a reality that’s excruciating to them.
Rather, they come from “realities” that are provisional models
of the presupposition YCYOR, wherein the projected patterns of
“their own” desideration are necessarily reflected, compared,
weighed, evaluated, balanced against and ruled upon by the
Whole-being Standard of Reality. (For extensive discussion of
these ideas see Bashar review, Motto in the Lotto and The Big
Spin.)
Why are they attracted here, then?
Precisely because, as a
collective tendency of consciousness we’ve already got a “start”
on the ego-model of “personal reality creation”. We’re already
implicitly-presumed little reality creators in the solipsistic
sanctuaries of our brains. That is nothing more than the overt
articulation of the tacit, working “scientific” hypothesis of
our day.
Our own unexamined presumptions are just embedded and “writ
large” in the presumptions undergirding YCYOR—for the question
which such an hypothesis really asks of itself (against its
Whole-being Ground) as it declares its validity is: “Who is this
‘You’ ”and “Your”? The “you” that “creates” by doing, acting,
performing etc., is manifestly a constituted agent; “you” arises
precisely through and in expression of the coordinative
qualities triangulating the given, variable-pattern instrument
as which will is enabled to modulate its focus, and so impart
particular emphasis.
The question circling around the free-will variable has to do
with emphasis, not arbitrary latitude.
First of all we must understand the principle of this “freedom”
within “will”, otherwise the most nescient new ager arguing
“arbitrary latitude” in flagrant disdain of any personal
examination of the themes involved, is vulnerable to the first
obvious blow to the conventions of the premise (having never
occurred to him, of course, previous to his own ingenuous
parroting).
Will isn’t free because it “arises in a vacuum
without innate values”; even should will arise in a vacuum (i.e.
the Buddhist nibbana, the vaunted state of void-mind etc.) that
vacuum isn’t without implicit values setting conditions to the
states in which any “prerogative” may manifest. It is the
pre-existence of such values even down to the irreducible
vacuum, which secures the very quality identifiable as “freedom
of will” and at the same time gives us the only set of operative
qualifications under which “freedom” is at all meaningful.
The easiest way to understand it, is in contemplation of an area
of blank page. Label it “vacuum”. Make a line (a line is the
minimal indication of the principle of Will, since it
establishes emphasis by both presence and directionality
[inclination or axial orientation]). Since this “line” occurs on
the background “vacuum” of the page, we have no right to ascribe
static values to its angle of orientation.
The blankness of the
vacuum gives us no external reference, no orienting coordinates
of “longitude” and “latitude” etc. We may rotate the page 360°,
and our arbitrarily deposited line will obligingly rotate
through every angle to its initial position. It will, in other
words, out of its single stroke generate a theoretically
inexhaustible set of radii inscribing the plane of a complete
circle.
Since the lengths of “the line” can
be extended infinitely, we may say this is a circle having a
circumference which is nowhere. The common “point” around which
the line was necessarily rotated, has no specific “place” at
which it acquires independent reality as a particular “size” or
specific location etc. Thus it is “everywhere”.
(This is why, geometrically, the
point is non-dimensional—the locus at which the radii theoretically
converge form an abstract or “ideal” point which may be
regressed to the “infinitely small” without being definitively
determined. Point is irreducible in the sense of an ontological
presence without extensionality, not in the sense of having
specific dimension, size or position.)
Let’s assume the vacuum through which these states inexorably
arise, is the equivalent of consciousness (in the fullest
spiritual sense of that illimitable Totality which enjoys such
perfect consistency and self-continuity with itself in
uninterrupted congruence with its own wholeness that it is, ipso
facto, aware of Itself as such whole-continuity, thus securing
its unqualified self-congruence by that very coming-to-itself).
This “vacuum” or Void which is consciousness-absolute may be
considered the total absence of all conditions or the total
presence of all conditions. In either case no particular is
differentiated, thus conserving its voidness. The positing of
any particular within its all-permissive potential, generates
the complementarity-symmetry of mutual inversions organized
around the holohedral features of any such particular; this is
what’s meant by the “implicit values setting conditions to the
states in which any ‘prerogative’ may manifest”.
Note that such conditions don’t
place a qualification upon consciousness; their sum is still
zero (i.e. they share a mutual convergence-locus or common
denominator at the—indeterminate—void-point juncture, where
every qualification is cancelled of its individual emphasis
while conserving characteristics of its comparative presence in
angular aspect with all else).
Consciousness is conserved as the
all-accommodating presence through which such radial
distributions of “coordinative trajectories” are enabled, and
may be “located” in terms of the superposed circular pattern
either at the infinite extreme of expansion or contraction, i.e.
as the transcendent factor of infinite radial extension or the
zero-sum factor of infinite mutual convergence. Both are implied
and required by the Void-totality of consciousness-absolute.
The qualifying radial extensions, theoretically of infinite
“density” in the subtle gradation from one to the other, may be
considered modulations of the qualities (Gunam, in Sanskrit
terminology). It is through variable coordinative alignments and
filtrate organizations in the angular relationships of
“diameter” and “radii” with respect to an ideally-delineated
“circumference”, that the perceptual grid-networks “screening”
any given universe of coinvolved/highlight qualities are drawn
into functional relief.
The answer as to how this “miracle of
creation” is accomplished in consciousness, when consciousness
in itself is definitionally so full and complete as to be
unequatable with delimiting instruments, is given in the
coincident location suggested above between the convergence
locus or common denominator of all radii of the “qualities”, and
the conserved void-presence indicative of Consciousness.
Consciousness, “enabled” to appear across its own potential
qualities through the void-point locus connate by “value” with
its own nature, takes the form of Will.
Will, as the Hadit-point,
“fits” consciousness as it were through the void-locus, into
specific congruence with the lineaform extensions comprising its
plenum of manifestable potential.
Slipping consciousness into congruent alignment with its
extensible qualities through the common-denominator
locus, the Hadit-point may function as central instrument of a
variable modulation emphasis, since all lines lead mutually to
it.
Thus consciousness “translates” in
terms of the pattern, as Will. It employs the agency of those
saturate extensions, through coincidence with their
common-denominator locus, in stressing selective “keys”
simultaneously raising while comparatively lowering overlapping
qualities in relative relief and recess thus modulating the
operative interaction of states to a complex identity-profile.
Will sets up waves in the (equipotential) Symmetry of the
potentiating pattern; it plays these variable flux-states like
piano keys, generating harmonics of ripple, repercussion and
resonance-interference conforming to the “score” written as
ideotype for a particular perceptual grid. Will’s operation is
therefore that of emphasis, not arbitrary latitude.
The “qualities” resident in the
combinative potential derived from infinite density-gradation
between adjacent radii (distributed through the Circle) possess
thereby a kind of eternal pre-existence, owing to the
All-accommodation of Absolute-being. They’re drawn into relief,
or comparatively recessed, so as to generate, reinforce or
modify the cognitive grid giving form to any world.
Even so, one
could presume an arbitrary latitude of emphasis owing to the thetic infinity of gradation, if the resultant qualities could
number “meaning” among their synthetic attributes (i.e. if
“sweetness of personality” oozed out of a chocolate candybar
along with its characteristic flavor, or “furtive rottenness of
soul” came attached like captions in a silent-movie morality
play when biting into a wormy apple).
Our theoretical “reality creator”
could then exercise a truly imperious and absolute power;
“meaning”, that which ultimately imparts the significance for
any world, state or form of consciousness thereby giving the
Rule both in principle and Person (i.e. answering specifically
“Who” and “What” is at the bottom of it all), would be placed
entirely in the hands of an independent intelligence of purely
arbitrary decision and latitude, whether we call it “latitude of
choice”—as in “productivity ex nihilo”—or “latitude of emphasis”
as in “infinite smorgasbord”. Intelligence could—in effect—walk
around the circle of infinitely-graded radii and pull out
“meaning” from the categorical slot of any potential quality,
and never have to return to starting point.
The circle of radii
with their potential combinative qualities would never
“circumscribe” such an intelligence, or ever give thought to
limit since any given “entry” into the potential of a radius
would constitute an inexhaustible tangent for exploitation. Like
an eternal infant, the “reality creator” could get lost in the
nursery of any given entrance-point to the elementa of radii,
picking one after another “meaning” along with the quality to
which whim might be attracted in order to Authorize another
universe.
If “meanings” inhered by one-to-one equivalency in the qualities
(represented by the graduated radii), “meaning” would be a
species in the sets-of-opposites along with color, sound, shape,
dimension etc., and the assumption of “reality creators” would
be justified: “meanings” could only be charged with equal and
opposite values that were equivalently arbitrary, and mutually
negating. “You” could then “create” by consciously deciding what
meaning you wished to pull out of the plenum of meanings,
assigning just that value as interpretive fiat of the whole.
“You” could decide to live in a world with oranges but not
apples.
If the elemental ratios constituting “oranges” gave rise
in themselves to a property called happiness, and the meaning
sorrow derived from the elemental ratios composing “apples”,
this kind of garden-weeding version of Reality Creating would be
viable; and, as absurd as it sounds stated this way, this is
precisely the kind of cognitive error made frequently in any
case, as when efforts are made to scourge and “purify” the race
through Eugenics, or exterminate a whole people so as to delete
“vice” from the world.
Yet we don’t feel the utter arbitrariness of the meanings which
experience seems to engender. We can’t pull them out of the
manifest qualities like whimsically picking strawberries, and we
can’t pluck them from our minds like interchangeable counters
conjured from mist. Experience persists in apparently
recommending meanings without foisting them as simple ciphers
for a given quality, as if there was something more substantial
to the whole than the idea of “arbitrary impositions” would
allow.
Meanings aren’t inherences of the polarized “qualities”.
They
are not projections or superpositions from an “independent”
consciousness (which would then have no instrumentality through
which to differentiate and apply “meanings”). Meanings, after
all, require a kind of gestalt elicitation; they are expressions
of a compound cognitive grid-network, regardless whether or not
that fact exhausts their descriptive significance. They express
the relationship between resultant ratios of emphasis
constituting the relief field of the “cognized world”, and the
Whole-being consciousness through which the qualities of that
world upsurge.
Though the ratios-of-emphasis are variable as
products of Will (i.e. the determinative impulses issued across
trajectories through the indeterminate Void-locus), they
uniformly arise within the framework of a constant (i.e. the
whole-being value of Consciousness). All such ratios,
constituting the very (perceptual and cognitive) essence of the
qualities, are generated in implicit comparative reference to
that Whole-being standard.
Thus, the “qualities” aren’t fixed entities or independent
states of set/static meaning derived from the pre-existent
plenum of Absolute, but variable resultants of the interactions
driven by “determinative indeterminacy” of the free-will
operator functioning through their elemental extensions. They
are thus effects of the relationship between (whole-being)
consciousness and its pre-existent potential; insofar as they
are qualities at all no matter the range of variability
exhibited by their compound character, they potentiate a halo of
meaning (not reducible to any of their attributes) right along
with their experiential values.
Meaning arises in the relation
between Whole-being value, and the comparative qualities
engendered from the pre-existent plenum of Its background
potential.
We may refer again to the volitional means of raising a given,
experiential venue into being (as function of a stylized gestalt
or grid-network patterning elemental ratios of the ideotype). A
radius or specialized combination of radii must be drawn into
relief (emphasized, stressed by trajectory-of-attention “pushing
off” from enabling triangulation of the coordinative potential
belonging to the whole “circle”); this proportionately recesses
other radii so as to generate the contrastive stress-ratios
comprising the sine qua non of perception and cognition.
Such
differential stress, the simplest component for producing any
given “reality-framework”, immediately breaks the equivalency
resident in the infinite equipotentiality of all radii in
themselves. Breaking the (infinite) equivalency by juxtaposed
contrast spontaneously finitizes the participating terms. It
establishes an angular relation amongst coordinate radii. This
restrictive finitization may be felt to generate a kind of
“meaning” already, as it acquires its finite quality in contrast
to the infinite equipotentiality of the circularly-distributed
radii as a whole.
The stress engendering such meaning can’t, however, be abolished
or “set right” by simple return of the respective radii to their
infinite equipotential extensiveness, for this would eliminate
the quality (and thus the Creation) through which it arose in
the first place. This would constitute a simple and immediate
lapse, so that “meaning” and “creation” never got off the
ground.
Rather, the proportion in the particular ratio generating the
quality, composed necessarily of unequal “sections”, immediately
calls into being its implicit mirror of counterbalancing
proportions (giving a ratio complementary to the first).
Corresponding proportions in the radii “across the way”, on the
opposite side of the circle, are automatically drawn upon. This
equilibrates and thus “cancels” the finitude of tilings
abstractly, on a global scale, without negating the respective
components of the see-saw equation—while focus may remain
preferentially pressed upon a particular pole of the global
structure.
“Meaning”, then, obviously doesn’t inhere by one-to-one
equivalency in the given quality (which arises as an angle or
combinative ratio of elemental components “finitizing” the
theoretically-infinite gradation obtaining between radii). Such
a quality doesn‘t exhaust the requirement involved in creative
potential, as we’ve seen; it generates a stress with respect to
the zero-sum whole. The halo of meanings that may arise around
any such quality is generated by the relationship of the quality
with respect to the Whole; it doesn’t inhere in the quality
itself (therefore “meaning”, while participating in the range of
opposites, doesn’t collapse into simple equivalency with the
range of opposites—as if “love” were just equivalent in
significant charge to “hate” so that they merely cancel each
other).
We can’t understand the Superior Reality informing our
processes, ever exempting us from the hell of arbitrary “reality
creation”, unless we understand the perdurable values of Being,
the Ontological constants to which we owe allegiance and
relative to which we can never stand, “over against”, as their
precedent fabricators and imperious “endowers”.
As an example of the difference between “meaning” and “quality”,
and their mutual relationship to the whole: let us consider a
particular object of perception; let’s contemplate a lemon.
(Arduous readers will note our persistent use of this one item
in illustrating a universe of implication, cf. Bashar review
etc. “Lemon”, LMVN, is a Jupiterian fruit first of all - number
value 126, cf. “Motto in the Lotto”; and its power to get the
imagination watering in anticipation of the glands makes it a
particularly vivid gift for indelibly exemplifying the whole
genre.) “Lemon” is a perception elicited through a delimited
range of “elemental ratios” (considered as the atomic
composition of the fruit, the molecular pattern of your
sense-receptors etc.).
As such, it establishes a particular
style of finitizing stress with respect to the whole. It
represents the whole as “sour”. “Sourness” in itself is a
quality. But what is its meaning? Is it strictly repellent in
terms of meaning? If it had but a single meaning for its given
quality, we could say “meaning” and “quality” were equivalent.
However, owing to the perception “lemon” being a quality
definitionally generated through a specific range in elemental
alignments, we find the variable play in ratios-of-adjustment
between experiencer/experience (together composing the total
quality) eliciting certain ambiguity as far as the reflexive
meaning of the perception is concerned.
According to the age or
growth-conditions of the fruit, the mood or electrolyte balance
of the “eater” etc., the quality experienced
through-and-as-lemon may be sweetly-sour, tart, gastrically
distressing, quenching, exhilarating, attractive or repellent.
We don’t arbitrarily assign these responses to the experience.
They’re a function of the whole being, and the aggregate
ratios-of-function obtaining through coordinative constituents
of the whole being.
Therefore “lemon” may represent that whole
in a variety of contingent ways, each conserving the general
sense and integrity of “lemon”. The quality “lemon” gives rise
to variable meanings, but all such meanings reference the
stress-state generated by that quality, to the whole. “Sourness”
may therefore have negative or positive meaning for us, under
any given set of prevailing conditions or compositional ratios
permissive of the experience.
The “meaning” doesn’t inhere in the
quality (the fruit, its sourness etc.); it arises in reference
of that quality to the whole. Therefore the “positiveness” or
“negativeness” of a sour lemon may arise as contingent
expression of variable conditions and 550 ratios-of-alignment
governing the given experience. But the “positive” and
“negative” values themselves aren’t arbitrary and equivalent
meanings! They refer to a real wholeness-of-being.
They give us
the current index of correspondence between the compositional
elements and governing ratios of our being, and the presiding
Whole-being value (the Circle) through which they arise. A
“negative” response symbolizes something immediate, in terms of
the given quality; it’s not that the lemon “is negative”—it
gives us an evaluative index of self-symbolizing states,
portraying—affectively—a certain potential in degree of
congruency or inharmony relative to Whole-being value.
The range allowed into existence through any given quality may
seem to be perfectly self-cancelling (i.e. since “lemon” seems
to range in potential value from “positive” to “negative” it may
appear to negate its own possible uniqueness, relative to all
else which equally covers the range and so seems to
self-cancel). But the way in which it covers and accounts for
that range remains finite, and therefore remains both
comparative and unique.
What is “positive”, symbolizes our
relation to whole-being value in a general way. The “positive”
experience of an exhilarating spray of lemon, symbolizes our
relation to whole-being value in a specific way, as a suggestive
or “instructive” mode (purification; conversion of the acidic,
by “digestion”, to the equilibratively alkaline etc.).
Note that “positive” and “negative”
aren’t arbitrarily interchangeable and equivalent. They give
preferential values with respect to whole-being. This is why
“love” isn’t just a member of the pairs of opposites,
arbitrarily equivalent to “hate”. Love corresponds to
Whole-being positively, “hate” corresponds negatively to
Whole-being. No capricious “reality creators” allowed here!
This limits the range of emphasis to a latitude less than
arbitrary. Meanings are made essential to the
ratios-of-relationship established against Whole-being Standard
(visualizable as the total Circle with indeterminately extensive
radii, indefinitely minute point, and illimitable background
Void). In keeping with the spirit of freedom ascribed to
Void-being, arbitrary meanings can be assigned any given value
or quality—i.e. you can christen a rock as “God’s Bounty” and
send it away hi a Care Package; but any such meaning is
accountable to the organic derivation of meanings drawn from the
relationship characterized above. Freedom is thus perfectly
conserved through any given context; yet responsibility and
consequence aren’t thereby negated or overthrown.
Deficiencies of operative meaning
with respect to the Reality of Whole-being, are a real component
of existence. They require compensation, active or passive, as
Service to and in implicit homage toward an eternally greater
Being than can be embossed or embellished by “reality creator”,
upper-or-lower case. You can’t create your “own reality”, even
given perfect freedom (or precisely owing to perfect
freedom)—for the very nature of that zero-factor freedom
involves an invariable supply-side of ontological preconditions
in support, maintenance, conservation and honor of the Reality
represented in that Freedom.
Thus the “you” and “your” addressed by the hortatory
“reality-creating” expositor from elsewhere (or from “here”), is
necessarily the “you” that creates by doing, acting,
performing—therefore such a “you” is manifestly a constituted
agent, arising precisely through and in expression of the
coordinative qualities triangulating the given, variable-pattern
instrument as which Will is enabled to modulate its focus, and
so impart particular emphasis.
Such an emphasis may stress the
comparative trajectory or axial alignment flowing out along
pattern-extensors from the common locus; or it may settle upon a
stabilized attention with respect to that locus itself.
One road leads along the contingent vector-coordinates of the
creation, in irresolvable displacement from infinite
Self-congruence with its ground; the other abruptly terminates
as any kind of “road” at all, and leaves nothing left over
except the infinite Self-congruence pertinent to the Identity of
Its ground.
“But what about God! What about God!” we hear our frustrated
“reality creators” calling out in one last monumental challenge,
on behalf of the Flounder found flipping its death-gasp on the
Greater Beach:
“Perhaps limited 3rd density consciousness hasn’t
the ‘right’ to proclaim it ‘creates its own reality’, but what
about the higher densities under direct correspondence with or
even equivalent to God-being. Surely even MT would allow
God to
‘create His Own Reality’.”
No. The same applies to Her as to
everyone else. It’s just that She is Aware of the Rule, and so
makes most direct and efficient use of It Indeed, She gives the
Rule, taken straight out of the Opulence of Her own Being, that
we may follow it and prosper in Beloved Bliss thereby. AMAEND.
Zoroaster:
Name of Iranian manifestation of the
Mahachohan (qv), second incarnation of the One Personality of
the present world period, circa 630-553 B.C. Denounced as The
Arch-heretic in the Clementine Recognitions, 4th century A.D.
(See
Mahachohan.)
Go
Back