| 
			 
			  
			
			  
			
			
			 
			
			  
			by Marco Torres 
			
			March 13, 2012 
			
			from
			
			PreventDisease Website 
			
			  
			
			  
			
				
					
						| 
						 
						Marco Torres is a 
						research specialist, writer and consumer advocate for 
						healthy lifestyles. He holds degrees in Public Health 
						and Environmental Science and is a professional speaker 
						on topics such as disease prevention, environmental 
						toxins and health policy.  | 
					 
				 
			 
			
			 
			 
			In the event that the public becomes too informed and savvy about 
			toxic additives in our food supply, what's a multi-billion dollar 
			industry to do?  
			
			  
			
			The first step is to create another more 
			toxic version of the additive. The second step is to collude with 
			regulatory authorities such as the FDA to convince the public that 
			the new, more toxic additive is safe. The third and final step is to 
			prevent the toxic additive from being listed on any ingredient 
			labels.  
			
			  
			
			From the folks that brought us 
			Aspartame, meet Neotame, a deadly sweetener that you'll never see on 
			a label because... well that's just the way the FDA wants it. 
  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			
			
			Neotame is officially marketed as an 
			inexpensive artificial sweetener made by NutraSweet, which is a 
			former division of Monsanto and original manufacturer of aspartame. 
			 
			Eighty percent of all Food and Drug Administration (FDA) complaints 
			pertain to aspartame's adverse reactions. These reports include: 
			grand mal seizures, brain tumors, blindness and other health-related 
			problems, including deaths.  
			
			  
			
			
			
			Monsanto’s Nick Rosa stated in 
			1998, that Neotame is, 
			
				
				“based on the aspartame formula.” 
			 
			
			It is up to 13,000 times sweeter than 
			sucrose (table sugar).  
			
			  
			
			The product is very attractive to food 
			manufacturers, as its use greatly lowers the cost of production 
			compared to using sugar or high fructose corn syrup (due to the 
			lower quantities needed to achieve the same sweetening). 
			 
			Neotame is aspartame plus 3-di-methylbutyl, which can be found on 
			the EPA’s list of most hazardous chemicals.  
			
			  
			
			The aspartame formula is 
			comprised of, 
			
				
					- 
					
					Phenylalanine [50%], which caused seizures in lab 
			animals   
					- 
					
					Aspartic Acid [40%], which caused “holes in the brains” 
			of lab animals,  
				 
			 
			
			...bonded by Methyl Alcohol, or Methanol [10%] which 
			is capable of causing blindness, liver damage and death. 
			 
			Methanol, or wood alcohol in aspartame breaks down further in heat 
			and in the body, into Formaldehyde (embalming fluid), Formic Acid 
			(venom in ant stings) and the most deadly of all - Diketopiperazine 
			(DKP), a brain tumor agent. 
			 
			When it comes to human health, neotame is in the same dangerous 
			category as aspartame, but it is a deadlier neurotoxin, immunotoxin 
			and excitotoxin. The long-term effects are essentially cell-death. 
			 
			Even Monsanto's own pre-approval studies of neotame revealed adverse 
			reactions. Unfortunately, Monsanto only conducted a few one-day 
			studies in humans rather than encouraging independent researchers to 
			obtain NIH funding to conduct long-term human studies on the effects 
			of neotame. 
			 
			There were NO independent studies that found neotame to be safe. All 
			industry-funded studies are now being found to be based on very 
			poorly designed, deceptive and fraudulent research . 
			 
			This is no surprise given all of the problems with aspartame 
			industry research and scientific abuse. It is clear that any neotame 
			research that Monsanto, industry groups, or consultants of Monsanto 
			should be rejected until which time more trustworthy, independent 
			research can be conducted.  
			
			  
			
			Such experiments should include 
			independent animals studies and especially long-term (e.g., 4-5 
			years+) human studies in various susceptible population groups. 
  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			 
			Approval and 
			Labeling 
			 
			Neotame was approved by the FDA for general use in July 2002, and 
			has now been approved by the EU. 
			
			  
			
			It is also is approved for use in 
			Australia, New Zealand and Canada. 
			 
			The FDA loosened all labeling requirements for Neotame as part of a 
			large-scale effort to make it a near-ubiquitous artificial 
			sweetener, to be found on the tabletop, in all prepared foods, even 
			in organics. It simply does not have to be included in the 
			ingredient list. How's that for stealth? 
			 
			If you purchase processed foods, whether USDA Certified Organic or 
			not, that food may likely contain Neotame because it is 
			cost-effective, and since no one knows it is there, there is no 
			public backlash. 
			 
			The USDA states that their National Organic Program (NOP) does not 
			permit the use of neotame in products labeled certified organic, 
			however this is likely a deceptive ploy to soothe the public's 
			concerns about this toxic sweetener. 
			 
			Since the USDA is controlled by politicians and lobbyists, it cannot 
			be trusted to follow through to protect any of its regulatory 
			policies.  
			
			  
			
			The NOP is a division within the USDA in 
			charge of regulating the USDA Certified Organic products, labeling, 
			enforcement etc. Considering the size of this division in comparison 
			to the amount of organic food they regulate, NOP standards are 
			arguably as lax and useless as USDA's conventional foods. The 
			employees that enforce NOP standards know this very well. 
			 
			Bottom Line: Don't trust USDA organic foods and confide in local 
			farms with reputable practices. 
  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			 
			Where Do We Go 
			From Here? 
			 
			Due to corporate greed, it is becoming quite apparent that the 
			entire food supply is becoming one toxic wasteland that none of us 
			can rely on. We need to support local farms and move our sustenance 
			back to sustainable farming practices that benefit the population 
			rather than harm it. 
			 
			If you're still consuming processed foods with artificial 
			sweeteners, you are gambling with your long-term well being.  
			
			  
			
			There are no corporations that serve 
			agribusiness that can be trusted to safeguard public health, and the 
			regulatory agencies that are officially in charge of that mandate 
			are in bed with them.  
			
			  
			
			Where does that leave the safety of the 
			food industry? I think you can figure that one out. 
  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			 
			Sources 
			
				
			 
			
			  
			
			 
			  |