Audio
Letter #8
Hello, everybody, this is Dr. Beter. Today is January 21, 1976, and
this is my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 8.
As we begin to celebrate the Bicentennial of our Independence, let
us reflect for a moment on our past. Out of a vast wilderness our
people created a nation with astonishing speed. Our Forefathers
brought forth a nation with the highest and most stable form of
self-government ever conceived by man. It was unique in the entire
world, a prescription for freedom simple enough for everyone to
understand, yet truly a work of genius. It’s no wonder that from our
earliest days as an independent nation the eyes of the entire world
have been riveted on the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
What was initially called our noble experiment was spectacular in
its success, and America’s banner of freedom became a symbol of hope
for oppressed peoples everywhere.
Would any of this have happened without the clear patriotic vision
of our Founding Fathers? Could it have come to pass without the
courage of George Washington who in 1776 led the famous surprise
attack on the far stronger British forces in Trenton? Would we have
had our inspired and inspirational CONSTITUTION if Benjamin
Franklin’s call for prayer had not broken the impasse over
representation at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in
1787? Could we ever have had a government sensitive to the wishes of
the people if the humility of our early leaders had been replaced
with the arrogant boasting practiced by our corrupt rulers of today?
And, would we have had a nation such as ours if our Founding Fathers
had believed in the internationalism promoted today by the
Rockefeller Brothers? What would our Founding Fathers say today if
they could see us meddling in the affairs of other countries? How
would they feel about the tremendous sacrifices they endured if they
could see our rulers of today building up another nation to become
our slave master at our own expense?
We would all do well to look back once again at the patriotic words
of George Washington in his Farewell Address as President. He
advised his countrymen to extend commercial relations to foreign
nations with as little political connection as possible. He did not
advise against such commercial relations in themselves, nor did he
object to temporary alliances with foreign nations when needed in an
emergency; but he did give us a clear, strong warning that has an
urgent relevance to us today, and I quote:
“to steer clear of permanent
alliances with any portion of the foreign world.”
Is this rule being followed today by our
Rockefeller Rulers and their client followers?
Since 1917 the Rockefeller empire has been allied with the Soviet
Union, with which we are to be merged against our will and
with the Soviets ultimately in the driver’s seat!! As I explained
last month, and have often discussed on other occasions, we the
people are the victims of an alliance between State Socialism in
Russia and Corporate Socialism here under the Rockefeller Brothers.
And, my friends, this is not an informal arrangement. Since at least
the early days of the Eisenhower Administration, which was actually
run behind the scenes by Nelson Rockefeller, there has been a White
House Directive which I am about to reveal to you for the very first
time. It is short, but not sweet. It establishes as a prime goal of
federal policy, and I quote here:
“to so alter life in the United
States that it can be comfortably merged with life in the Soviet
Union.”
My friends, I do not merely challenge, I
dare President Ford or anyone else in the White House to deny the
existence of this Directive under oath. They won’t do so unless they
have become so desperate that they are willing to gamble on any
bluff, because I have access to documentary evidence on this matter
that could immediately convict them for perjury and lead to
impeachment and/or prison.
Yes, this short White House Directive, my friends, quote: “to so
alter life in the United States that it can be comfortably merged
with life in the Soviet Union”—that’s the key to all of our domestic
and foreign policy today. It explains why we have become the factory
for the Soviet Union. It explains why so many multinational
corporations are being used to build up the Soviet economy while
depressing our own. It explains why the many huge
Rockefeller-controlled, tax-exempt Foundations, which are all
working in this direction, are immune to prosecution for their
flagrant violation of their charters. It explains why the
Rockefeller-controlled banks and financial institutions are so
single-mindedly financing the Soviet Juggernaut at American taxpayer
expense.
It is little wonder that Nobel Prize-winning biologist George Wald
in an article a year ago about the runaway power of the
multinational corporations said, and I quote: “hence no nation so
closely resembles the United States as the Soviet Union.” My fellow
citizens, it is essential that we halt this horrible slippage
backward into tyranny. If we are to survive as a free people beyond
this our Bicentennial Year, we, the people, must rise up and make
the Government that belongs to us turn its face forward once again
to the still new, still fresh ideals and principles that launched
our great nation. I am absolutely convinced that we can still do it
IF WE WILL.
Last month I recorded AUDIO BOOK No. 6 entitled “WHAT WE CAN DO TO
SAVE AMERICA” to explain the strategy which I believe can and will
do the job. And already alert citizens all over America are
listening to this message, getting to work, and making suggestions.
If YOU will join in the task, we can do it.
Meanwhile I intend to keep informing you about what we are up
against, how events are progressing, and what plans are being formed
behind the scenes. To this end, I want to talk to you today about
three topics that all reflect the drive to merge life in America
with that in the Soviet Union.
-
Topic #1 - OUR CHARGES
FOR A CITIZENS’ INDICTMENT ON THE FORT KNOX TWIN SCANDAL
COVER-UP
-
Topic #2 - ROCKEFELLER
PROGRESS AND PROBLEMS IN THEIR DRIVE TO DRAG OUR ECONOMY DOWN TO
THE SOVIET LEVEL
-
Topic #3 - SO-CALLED
“DETENTE” AND THE IGNORED PROPHETIC WARNINGS OF GEORGE
WASHINGTON
Topic #1
- It is essential that I give special
attention to the first topic today, but I will deal with the
remaining two topics as fully as I can in the time that remains for
them.
Almost two years ago in April 1974 during Congressional testimony
before a subcommittee of the “House Banking and Currency Committee”
I first revealed that the Bullion Depository at Fort Knox had been
looted of its gold. I stood ready to present evidence to
substantiate my charges, but nothing whatever was done! Having been
failed by Congress, I then took my story to the public through
lectures, radio Talk Shows, and publication of my charges in a
national weekly newspaper. Faced by this public pressure, the
Government responded by setting in motion a well orchestrated
cover-up, a cover-up far more massive and more serious than that of
the Watergate scandal which removed our last elected President from
office.
The actual cover-up began on September 23, 1974, with the carefully
staged visit of Congressmen and newsmen to Fort Knox.
I have detailed the ensuing cover-up, among other things, in my
AUDIO BOOK No. 2 on the “FORT KNOX GOLD SCANDAL AND WHAT IT MEANS TO
YOU.” I have also given you continuing updates since June 1975 by
means of my monthly AUDIO LETTER. In October 1975 I revealed what I
had just learned at that time that makes a “twin” super scandal of
the Fort Knox situation—namely, the presence of about 60 pounds of
radioactive liquid super poison processed from deadly plutonium-239
in the Central Core Vault of the Bullion Depository at Fort Knox.
The canisters of poison put there in 1968 by the CIA are corroding
and leaking faster and faster, endangering the health and even the
lives of millions of Americans in the southeastern United States.
The Government’s response to this second, far more serious half of
the Fort Knox Scandal, has been the same as to the first—COVER UP.
I’ve explained in recent months how first Senator Frank Church and
then Congressman Otis Pike, Chairmen respectively of the Senate and
House Intelligence Committees, have become parties to the Fort Knox
plutonium scandal cover-up; and how bureaucratic gobbledygook is
being used by Government officials to avoid giving straight, honest
answers about the situation.
But now, the Fort Knox Scandal cover-up is getting even worse. It
has recently entered a new phase of outright lying and of masking
the evidence concerning my charges. They are going for broke, and
they have long since passed the point of no return. The same tactics
of lying and cheating by the Government that are standard practice
in the Soviet Union, into which we are to be merged, are now being
used here in the United States, and these tactics are far more
effective here than in Russia because Americans, unlike Soviet
citizens, have not yet learned to expect their government to lie to
them continuously. Up ‘till now the main cover-up approach has been
one of evasion, but now an atmosphere of desperation on the part of
the wrongdoers is becoming increasingly apparent. For the very first
time Treasury Secretary William Simon has made the fatal mistake of
actually lying, in writing no less, about a crucial matter—the
existence of the Central Core Vault of the Bullion Depository at
Fort Knox. We have challenged the Government to either confirm or
deny its existence in the past; and we have identified it not only
by this name, “Central Core Vault”, but also by describing it to
avoid any possibility of misunderstanding due to terminology.
In a letter to a friend of mine dated December 10, 1975, Simon said
the following, and I quote:
“The allegation that plutonium 239
is, or ever has been stored at Fort Knox in a central core vault
is false, and the Army has just conducted an extensive test of
the Bullion Depository and has found no evidence of
radioactivity. I should add that there is no such thing as the
Central Core Vault.”
Notice that Simon’s denial of the
presence of plutonium-239 at the Depository is tied right in with
his denial of the existence of the Central Core Vault. Obviously if
there is no Central Core Vault then it cannot contain plutonium-239!
But on the other hand, to have any faith that his denial about the
plutonium is truthful, you must also believe his assertion that
there exists no Central Core Vault at the Depository. If he would
lie about one, he would lie about the other.
With that in mind, please listen now to an excerpt from another
letter—this one written to one of my associates by a retired
Lieutenant General, John L. Ryan, Jr., a former Commanding General
of Fort Knox. General Ryan probably knows more about the Depository
than anyone else who ever commanded Fort Knox. He spent two tours of
duty there before he returned a third time as the Commanding
General; and when the gold was moved to Fort Knox to be stored there
for the very first time in 1937, it was he who was placed in charge
of the actual physical movement of the incoming gold into the
Depository. With regard to the disputed Central Core Vault, he says,
quote:
“When I use the word ‘vault’ I am
referring to the central core of the Depository where the
bullion was stored. This vault was below ground level and could
be entered only through a specially constructed bank-type door
that opened onto a screw lift. This door was in the
Receiving-Shipping area of the Depository. The
Receiving-Shipping room was above ground level. The vault was
below ground level. Around the vault proper, or central core,
below ground level was a passageway. On this passageway were a
number of cell-like compartments. There was no means of entering
the vault from this passageway.”
My friends, the passageway with its
compartments are all that the visitors saw in September 1974. The
existence of the Central Core Vault, which is where the gold, if
any, should have been, is absolutely confirmed by General Ryan; and
as his letter makes clear, the 1974 visitors had no chance of
finding out about it while wandering around in the passageway and
looking at the small compartments you heard and read about in the
news.
Such bald-faced lying is bad enough, but the mounting desperation of
the Rockefeller Brothers and their lackeys over Fort Knox now goes
even beyond mere lying. It is standard practice whenever an
extremely damaging secret is in danger of exposure, to distract
attention from it and confuse the issue by deliberately exposing
something else—something far less serious and dangerous than the
secret being hidden yet shocking enough to satisfy the public’s
appetite for the truth.
With our totally manipulated government of today, a good rule of
thumb is whenever something that looks really damaging is
revealed, ask yourself: “Why are they letting this out of the bag?
What is it that is worse that they are trying to distract
my attention from?” Thus, for example, Sen. Church’s sensational
revelations last summer about deadly shellfish toxins and the like
fooled many into believing they had been given the wholeugly truth
about CIA misdeeds, but actually he was covering up what he knew
about the insane nuclear super poison at Fort Knox—something a
thousand times worse than anything he revealed. Now in the same way
a cover-up campaign has been launched in regard to the leakage of
the plutonium-239 super poison from Fort Knox, and it’s horrible. A
few days ago on January 12, 1976, a truck carrying radioactive waste
just “happened” to have an accident in eastern Kentucky, smack in
the heart of the area now most heavily affected by radioactive
poison leakage from Fort Knox. Fourteen of the 32 drums of waste on
the truck fell off, and 8 of them broke open and leaked. The
newspaper stories around there about it contained the usual
assurances that there was no danger, that it had been cleaned up,
etc., but leakage had occurred.
Just six days later on January 18 newspapers contained big articles
about still another alleged radioactive waste leakage problem in
Kentucky.
The truck I mentioned a moment ago had been on its way to a nuclear
waste dumping ground at Maxey Flats, Kentucky, which had been in use
since 1963, and now we are suddenly told that the leakage is
occurring there too. Federal investigators, those wonderful
watchdogs we are supposed to trust and admire, claimed that
radioactive waste in steel, wooden, and even cardboard drums has
been just dropped into trenches and covered up with dirt; and after
12 years they have just now abruptly discovered that some of it has
gotten loose and is spreading through the ground, through the water,
and through the air. And a study by the General Accounting Office,
while it gives the standard assurance that there is no immediate
danger, recommends a crash program to correct the situation and
develop systematic standards for safe disposal of radioactive waste.
Now, why all of this sudden concern about leakage of radioactive
contamination? And why does the spotlight on actual leakage cases
just happen to be on Kentucky? After all, there are vastly more
serious problems of this sort elsewhere in the United States, for
example, in New York State—but so why Kentucky? Two reasons, my
friends. For one thing, they are using the opportunity to continue
the nuclear “con game” that has been pulled on you for years by
assuring you even when there are nuclear waste leakages that you
don’t really have to worry about it. But, more importantly, in my
monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 7 last month I posed a direct challenge to
the federal government to either prove or disprove my charges; and I
spelled out a fair, objective way to do it. What is going on now is
their answer to my challenge by spreading stories about other kinds
of radioactive waste leakage in the general vicinity of Fort Knox,
and possibly by deliberately causing such releases—such as occurred
in the truck accident—they are feverishly tampering with the
evidence.
The program I suggested to use offsite measurements to detect
leakage from the Bullion Depository at Fort Knox would, as they can
now argue, no longer prove anything conclusively about my charges
because of these other radioactive leakages which allegedly have
also suddenly been discovered in the same region. I, for one, would
like to see the whole business about Fort Knox laid to rest once and
for all, and I know you would too. I know that my charges about the
gold and about the plutonium poison are true; but for the sake of
argument IF I were wrong, I would rather be honestly proven wrong
about any or all of them and be made a laughingstock than to have
the American people’s worry over this matter dragged out endlessly
like this.
Whatever the truth is, I want you to know; but the Rockefeller
lackeys in the Government know only too well that the truth is
exactly what I have told you, and they don’t want you to know. They
will do anything and everything to try to save themselves regardless
of how many other human beings they may doom in the process. And so,
my friends, this is the vicious reality behind the smooth mask that
our Rockefeller-controlled federal government wears. We, the people,
must bring the pressure to bear that will cause these things to be
honestly investigated and corrected.
The United States is under the thumb of modern outlaws; and if we do
not bring them to justice, they will bring us and our children to
total ruin. So far the United States Congress has not seen fit even
to consider my charges about the gold, about the plutonium, about
anything! The problem is not that I don’t have the evidence, but
that I have too much of it. The same applies to the Justice
Department, the General Accounting Office, the White House, and so
on, so on.
But recently a Congressman who heard my testimony in Congress about
the missing Fort Knox gold in April 1974 and who went to Fort Knox
in September 1974, gave us a tiny opening, whether wittingly or
unwittingly. His constituents have been pressing him continuously
for some answers about Fort Knox; and in recent replies which were
forwarded to me, he in effect challenged us to do exactly what we
have wanted to do for nearly two years—to present our charges and
evidence in a proper legal forum. Our response is a six-page “Open
Letter” by my able co-patriot, Mr. Edward Durell of Berryville,
Virginia. The letter is addressed to Congressman John B. Conlan of
Arizona—but it is open, because based on past performance we have
little reason for optimism that he will take any constructive action
unless he is forced to do so by public pressure.
The letter presents charges which parallel completely, even in legal
form, the impeachment charges leveled at President Nixon by the
House of Representatives. It is a legal document, and YOU are the
nation-wide Grand Jury. Under our CONSTITUTION, it is ultimately we,
the people, who constitute the highest human authority in our land,
and it is UP TO YOU to decide. Do our charges deserve an open,
complete, honest investigation in a proper legal forum or not? If
so, it is UP TO YOU to return a “Citizens Indictment” by demanding
that your elected representatives provide a legal forum through
Congressional investigation or formal Grand Jury proceedings.
Here now is Mr. Durell’s letter to Congressman Conlan of Arizona. I
will be quoting from the letter from here on all the way to Mr.
Durell’s signature. Mr. Durell’s letter is dated January 7, 1976:
“Dear Mr. Conlan,
Your letters of December 5, 1975, to Mrs. Mary Barrow and Mr.
Art Bentley both of Lake Havasu City, Arizona, have been sent to
me for comment. To that end I write direct to you, with copies
to them and other interested parties.
In your letter to Mrs. Barrow you state among other things that,
quote: ‘Grand Juries are empaneled to investigate criminal
wrongdoing’, and that if, quote: ‘you personally have evidence
of crimes committed in connection with our nation’s gold
holdings, please let me know so that I can put you directly in
touch with appropriate officials of the United States Justice
Department who would have jurisdiction in this matter.’
In your letter to Mr. Bentley you state among other things that
while you have, quote: ‘some misgivings’ about the gold
situation, quote: ‘I can assure you that exposure to any
radioactive poison would have caused me serious illness. Neither
I nor anyone else who went to Fort Knox has suffered any such
illness.’
Please allow us firstly to answer your letter to Mr. Bentley. It
is common knowledge in nuclear medicine that if one is exposed
to alpha particle radiation of plutonium, death due to cancer
can come in a matter of months or years. It all depends upon
dosage level and duration of exposure. In this respect we would
suggest that you contact Dr. John Gofman, former professor of
Medical Physics emeritus, University of California at Berkeley;
or listen to him by way of a one-hour tape cassette obtainable
from AUDIO BOOKS, INC., P. O. Box 16428, Fort Worth, Texas,
76133; special tape No. 2 for $6.00 postpaid.
(Editor’s note - 1981 address is: The Dr. Beter AUDIO LETTER -
Suite 5092, 1629 K Street, N.W. - Washington, D.C. 20006.
Current price is: $7.50 postpaid.)
In this tape Dr. Gofman speaks on
the effects of radioactive poison, among other things.
In addition, over 18% increase in cancer deaths in the first
seven (7) months this year over last year has taken place in the
central-eastern states, which has left medical authorities in
the dark as to the cause. They felt they had made such
tremendous cancer advancements in the last few years, and then
to have such a high upsurge in the first seven months this year
over last year in that area alone, is baffling.
One more thing about this radioactive poison in the United
States Bullion Depository at Fort Knox—hereinafter called ‘Fort
Knox.’ We know from sources in the Intelligence industry that
this plutonium poison was part of the plutonium-239 stolen by
members of the Intelligence community in 1966 and that this most
deadly substance was processed in four plants—two in Kentucky,
one in North Dakota, and one in California—into radioactive
liquid poison. It was then taken - 60 pounds each—to Peru,
Panama, Bolivia, and Argentina under cover of a multinational
cement corporation by a CIA officer, Harold Leroy White, for the
sole purpose of threatening to contaminate the United
States-planned and built water aqueduct systems in those
countries for political and economic pressure. Sixty pounds,
however, intended for use in Argentina, was brought back by Mr.
White and placed in the Central Core Vault at Fort Knox where it
has been stored ever since late 1968. The casks are now
corroding, causing leakage and contamination over the entire
areas east and southeast of Kentucky, and as far away as Cuba.
This contamination is endangering the lives of over 40-million
people in this country. Can we afford to allow these people to
be expendable?
The federal government has now publicly admitted our charges
that opium and morphine - 150,000 pounds and 24,000 pounds
respectively-are stored at Fort Knox. Why will it not admit the
existence of the plutonium?
It is suggested that to do so might subject the Government to
thousands of legal actions involving hundreds of millions of
dollars under the Federal Tort Claims Act and/or the Price
Anderson Act, the 1954 Atomic Energy Act as amended, Title 42
Section 2011 and following for, quote: ‘extraordinary nuclear
occurrence’—that is, quote: ‘any event causing a discharge or
dispersal of source, special nuclear or by-product material from
its intended place of confinement in amounts off site or causing
radiation levels off site and which has resulted or will
probably result in substantial damages to persons off site or
property off site.’
And why will it not admit the loss of our gold reserves? For the
same reasons—legal actions including those criminal in nature.
And in the latter connection, we would like here to pursue your
suggestion to Mrs. Barrow and list the charges of the high
crimes committed relative to disappearance of the people’s gold
reserves.
On behalf of the American people it is herein charged that the
United States Treasury Department—hereinafter called
‘Treasury’—in violation of its Constitutional duty to protect
the people’s gold and in violation of its Constitutional duty to
take care that the laws relative to the safeguarding and custody
of said gold be faithfully executed, has failed so to do in that
between January 1, 1961, and January 1, 1974, prior and
subsequent thereto, Treasury engaged itself through its
officers/agents and in concert with others in America’s
corridors of financial power in a course of conduct or plan
designed to convert unto themselves the people’s gold entrusted
to it for safekeeping for the avowed purpose of profiting unjust
enrichment; and in a course of conduct or plan designed to cover
up, conceal and protect those responsible and to conceal the
existence and scope of other unlawful covert activities. The
means used to implement this conduct or plan have included one
or more of the following:
-
1. Treasury has failed to render
a true account of the amount of gold shipped out from the
United States Bullion Depositories from 1961 to 1968 under
color of the ‘London Gold Pool Agreement’
-
2. Treasury has failed to reveal
the true prices, if any, received for the sale of said gold
or reveal the names of the ultimate purchasers of said gold
-
3. Treasury has failed to give a
true account of the amount of gold shipped out of the United
States Bullion Depositories from 1968 to 1974 under color of
an ad hoc committee composed of the Chairman of the Federal
Reserve Board, the Chairman of the Council of Economic
Advisers, the Chairman of the White House Council on
International Economic Policy, the Secretary of State, and
the Secretary of Treasury, among others
-
4. Treasury has issued a
statement dated August 31, 1974, purporting to list
24-million ounces of good delivery gold at Fort Knox when in
actual fact the Secretary of the Treasury admitted December
3, 1974, that such listing is false or misleading
-
5. Treasury has taken, December
9, 1974, without lawful authority, two-million ounces of
gold from the Exchange Stabilization Fund by a simple
bookkeeping device and four days later announced by way of
the General Services Administration that there would be an
auction of two-million ounces of gold on an ‘as is’ basis
January 6, 1975. In addition, a Dutch auction was held June
30, 1975, with the remainder of said gold based on a price
not considered best for the taxpayers of America
-
6. Treasury has caused a
statement to be issued April 11, 1975, which is false or
misleading in that it purports to list all of the gold
shipments out of Fort Knox when in actual fact such list
omitted among other things a shipment of gold consisting of
four (4) tractor-trailer loads on January 20, 1965, which
shipmentconsisted of 1.762-million ounces valued over
sixty-one million dollars ($61,000,000) at $35.00 per troy
ounce—the par value for official gold at that time
-
7. Treasury has in its immediate
possession and control the necessary keys, combination
numbers, and time-control data for the vaults, depositories,
and their mechanisms. It thus has the highest duty to take
care that its trust be faithfully executed, but it has acted
in a manner contrary to its trust and subversive of
responsible government to the great prejudice and to the
manifest injury of the people of the United States by acting
in concert with others to aid and abet, to surreptitiously
remove the gold under the cover of legal right
-
8. Treasury has made false or
misleading statements for the purpose of deceiving the
people of the United States into believing that a thorough
and complete inspection and audit have been conducted with
respect to allegations that Fort Knox contains no
significant amounts of gold and not accounted for, in that
an inspection trip to Fort Knox September 23, 1974, revealed
one (1) cell-like compartment, No. 33, to contain only
copper-hued bars. Mrs. Mary Brooks, the Director of the
Mint, Treasury, said, quote: ‘It’s all here.’ Her statement
is analogous to the so-called Audit of October 1974 of only
three (3) of the cell-like compartments at Fort Knox, which
Audit callsthe Report to be submitted to Congress February
10, 1975 - also based on a belief that, quote: ‘It’s all
here.’
Further, the inference given by the inspection trip and the
Audit was that the gold at Fort Knox was of good delivery
form and the remaining ten (10) cell-like compartments were
full of good delivery gold
-
9. Treasury is withholding
relevant and material evidence or information from the
American people in total disregard or violation of the
Constitutional right of the people to know what has happened
to its gold reserves and to its right of freedom of
information for purposes unrelated to national security, the
enforcement of laws, or any other lawful functions of
Treasury in that the Central Core Vault at Fort Knox was
concealed from the inspection group of over 100 news media
people, six (6) Representatives, and one (1) Senator of the
United States Congress
-
10. Treasury has unlawfully
utilized its authority to cause the General Accounting
Office to fail to take care that the laws be faithfully
executed in that the General Accounting Office, a
legislative entity, was forced to have only two (2) of its
own people on a settlement committee to audit the alleged
gold at Fort Knox, whereas Treasury had thirteen (13) of its
own people on said committee
-
11. Treasury has not caused to
be made an annual physical inventory of the people’s gold
since 1953. Thus Treasury has failed to take care that Title
31 USC be faithfully executed by failing to make the
required annual physical inventories.
In all of this and more, Treasury
has acted in a manner contrary to its trust and subversive of
Constitutional government to the great prejudice of law and
justice and to the manifest injury of the people of the United
States; wherefore, Treasury through its officers, agents and
others in concert with it, by such conduct or plan, warrant such
parties be brought before appropriate legal authorities to
answer these charges; and, further, for the restitution of the
people’s gold except that portion which is contaminated by
radioactive poison in which case said parties shall be ordered
to pay the current market gold price and for such other
appropriate action as may be deemed just and proper in the
premises.
In support of the charges, please be informed that former
Congressman Frank Chelf’s AFFIDAVIT dated April 7, 1975, in
which he deposes and says among other things, and I quote: ‘that
the United States government was moving quietly as a church
mouse out of Fort Knox’ and that the gold was, quote:
‘constantly and surreptitiously on the move.’
Fort Knox is located in former
Congressman Chelf’s Congressional District. He further deposes
and says that, quote:
‘In response to my previous requests for gold removal
information, Treasury officials had been courteous and most
friendly but always non-committal or evasive.’ Mr. Chelf had
earlier made the same charges on the floor of the House of
Representatives, but to no avail. (See Congressional Record page
15522 - August 21, 1963.)
Further, Lt. General John L. Ryan, Jr., US Army (Ret.), in his
statement of September 26, 1975 before Congressman Otis G. Pike
in his office, has proved the existence of the Central Core
Vault and in fact has drawn sketches of it. In view of this,
there is no valid reason for the Secretary of Treasury to
continue to deny the existence of the Central Core Vault at Fort
Knox unless there is something deeply secret stored therein.
There admittedly may have been the necessity for some secrecy in
the 1960’s when all of the gold at Fort Knox was stored in the
Central Core Vault. Why the secrecy now, since the Comptroller
General has stated on February 10, 1975, quote: ‘As of June 30,
1974 about 55% of the gold claimed by the Treasury was stored in
thirteen (13) sealed compartments at the United States Bullion
Depository at Fort Knox, Kentucky’?
As further evidence, we call your
attention to the balance sheets of the 12 Federal Reserve Banks,
which carry Gold Certificate accounts as an asset to reflect a
stated amount of gold which, in turn, is reflected as a
liability on Treasury balance sheets; however it is submitted
these Gold Certificate accounts reflect assets—gold—which do not
in fact exist in Treasury vaults. This same situation prevailed
in 1943 relative to silver when, quote: ‘14,000 tons of silver
from the Treasury reserve backing American paper money was
secretly taken from Treasury vaults although carried publicly on
the Treasury balance sheets’, cited in “Tragedy and Hope” by
Professor Carroll Quigley, page 855, 1966/1974.
We could go on, but suffice it to say that Treasury during our
18 months investigations has not moved to refute by evidence the
basic charges outlined above. Meanwhile our economy is suffering
by those twin disasters, inflation and deflation—high prices
with high unemployment—initially caused by the disposing of our
gold reserves in secret and its attendant game plan.
Mr. C. Gordon Tether in his December 11, 1975, article, quote:
‘A NEW TWIST OF FORT KNOX SAGA’
in the Financial Times of London stated, quote:
‘But whatever the cost in
terms of loss of face, might not the United States
authorities be well advised to do whatever is necessary
to demonstrate that there is no Fort Knox cover-up? In
the light of what has happened in the United States
during the past few years, deeds inevitably now speak
louder than words; and the refusal to prove that they
have nothing to hide, is inevitably destined to go on
fostering precisely the opposite impression.’
Considering all of the above, would
you please be so kind as to put the undersigned and Dr. Peter
Beter, as you offered to do for Mrs. Barrow, quote: ‘directly in
touch with appropriate officials of the United States Justice
Department who would have jurisdiction in this matter’? I am
authorized to state that Dr. Beter concurs with the contents of
this letter and is fully prepared to give further evidence
before a United States Grand Jury and any Congressional
investigating committee in confirmation of the charges herein
cited, among others. Further, I would suggest you personally
bring this letter to the attention of the Chairman of the House
Banking Committee of which you are a member, for appropriate
action. Failure on your part to do so will lend credence to the
fact you, yourself, have become part and parcel of the cover-up
on this vital matter; and failure on the part of the Chairman of
said Committee to take such action will further lend credence to
the fact that he himself is in league with those underlying
forces at work in America’s corridors of financial power.
Most respectfully,
EDWARD DURELL.”
Topic #2
- In my AUDIO BOOK No. 2 on “THE FORT
KNOX GOLD SCANDAL AND WHAT IT MEANS TO YOU”, I warned you to watch
for the Stock Market crash signal, meaning general unemployment in
the range of 20 to 25%. This was originally targeted by the
Rockefeller Brothers for the fall of 1975, but their schedules have
been increasingly upset by their preoccupation with the Fort Knox
Scandal “cover-up” and by the anti-CIA actions of Indira Gandhi last
summer. Even so, they are working frantically to get the pieces of
their plan together again.
Here in America, the Government officially says that unemployment in
November 1975 was 8.3%; but my own confidential information, direct
from sources within the Bureau of Labor Statistics, is that the true
figure for November was over 15% - and still increasing! Therefore
the real unemployment levels are now moving closer and closer to the
Stock Market crash signal levels I revealed nearly a year ago.
Meanwhile the Dow Jones averages lately are streaking upward
artificially in a dream world of their own, totally divorced from
reality. The stage is being set for a dramatic visible plunge
downward if the Rockefeller Brothers cut the cable on the Stock
Market elevator.
And New York City, supposedly safe from outright bankruptcy by
federal loans, is already far behind in its schedule for
raisingfunds to stay afloat under that loan program. At the same
time,the Nation’s banks are again the subject of widespread concern,
and no wonder. Recently front page stories have deliberately been
planted in major Rockefeller-controlled newspapers about the alleged
shakiness of the mammoth Chase Manhattan Bank and in even larger
First National City Bank of New York, both of them Rockefeller
controlled. This is partly an attempt to lower theRockefeller
profile by saying:
“See, we have problems too.”
But more importantly, it is a deliberate
effort to undermineconfidence in our whole banking system. Banks and
their customers should therefore watch for trouble. A publication
which is doing an outstanding job of keeping on top of the banking
situation as well as many other matters is the Daily News Digest,
Box 27496, Phoenix, Ariz. 85061 This month’s meeting of the
International Monetary Fund in Jamaica produced no communique, no
general agreement, only reflecting continued confusion there.
Pressed by the smoldering Fort Knox Scandal on one hand and the
imminent war in the Middle East on the other, the primary goal of
the Rockefeller Brothers has now shifted to just one thing—to
abolish the official price of gold in America so that the
non-existent American gold hoard can be quietly dropped from
Treasury and Federal Reserve balance sheets. Most of the IMF gold is
beyond their grasp for the time being.
SO-CALLED “DETENTE” AND THE IGNORED PROPHETIC WARNINGS OF GEORGE
WASHINGTON
Topic #3
Last summer Indira Gandhi cracked down on the CIA to stop the
Rockefeller take-over of her country, India. Existing war
preparations were immediately diverted to a new direction, and since
that time a major new Asian war has been brewing. In my monthly
AUDIO LETTER No. 6 two months ago, I spelled out the basic strategy
for this war, including the role to be played by the Middle East
conflict in paving the way for the Asian War. Plans are proceeding
rapidly.
A few days ago Japanese Prime Minister Miki fell into a Soviet trap.
Reacting to brusk and uncooperative Soviet treatment, he announced
that Japan will sign a treaty with Red China that includes the
anti-Soviet hegemony clause desired by China. At the same time, as
you may have noticed in news reports, American business men are
rapidly packing up and leaving Japan, supposedly because their
Japanese understudies are now ready to manage things themselves—but
actually because the Rockefeller Brother interests are bailing out
in advance of war, just as happened a few months ago in Lebanon.
To set the stage for the big Asian War, hostilities are first to
break out in the Middle East to provide an excuse for a limited
American nuclear strike to cap off Arab OPEC oil wells. This will
result in cementing the Sino-Japanese alliance for war, neutralizing
Europe and producing real suffering there, and causing gas rationing
in a major body blow to our wobbly economy here in the United
States.
The terrorist attack on OPEC oil ministers in Vienna last month,
engineered by our own CIA, was supposed to get the ball rolling in
all of this. Two key oil ministers were supposed to be killed,
leading to escalating reprisals and war—but the job was botched. For
bungling this top priority operation, the man in charge, Richard
Welch, the CIA station chief in Athens, was judged unreliable and
executed by the CIA itself.
And now Lebanon, which was primarily a distraction earlier, has now
become the new springboard by which the broader Middle East conflict
is to be enlarged. All of this, my friends, is part and parcel of
so-called “detente” with Soviet Russia on the way to a world
collectivist dictatorship. Rockefeller Brothersinternationalism,
which is always portrayed by them as the path to peace, is actually
a prescription for war, destruction, andenslavement. To them it is
“progress.”
On December 31, 1975, President Ford said on the eve of our
Bicentennial Year, and I quote: “Liberty is the most precious
possession of our past.” But, fellow citizens, it is up to us to
restore liberty to our future as well. Had we simply been heeding
George Washington’s wise warning to avoid permanent foreign
alliances, the horrors I have been discussing would not exist. In
his Farewell Address, he also left us with many other equally wise
observations that have direct application today. Washington’s words
and example helped launch the greatest nation on earth, and they can
help get it moving forward again IF WE WILL ALLOW THEM TO. In this,
our Bicentennial Year, I plan to return frequently to the
forward-looking sage advice left to us by our great first President.
Until next month, this is Dr. Beter. Thank you, and may God bless
each and every one of you.
|