Audio Letter
#18
Hello, my friends, this is Dr. Beter. Today is November 20, 1976,
and this is my monthly AUDIO LETTER® No. 18. As I speak with you
today, we are drawing ever closer to being swallowed up by the evils
unleashed two generations ago by a tight network of Foundation
Trustees. Operating under a false cloak of philanthropy, supposedly
for the benefit of others, they actually launched long-range
programs designed to grab everything for themselves.
Claiming to improve education in the cause of freedom, they actually
began replacing education with indoctrination in the
cause of collectivism. And while painting themselves as champions of
peace, they have led the world into war after war on
the road to their version of “peace”—that is, an all-powerful WORLD
GOVERNMENT with themselves in control. Blinded by the insatiable
greed for power, they could not see that they were opening Pandora’s
box, setting forces in motion that would ultimately prove impossible
to control. Only recently, with disaster looming up fast, have the
present-day successors to those original Trustees begun awakening to
this fact, too late to regain control. Now only the truth spread far
and wide can avert total catastrophe.
Two years ago the United States of America plunged over the brink of
a devastating economic collapse as the result of deliberate measures
to create “stagflation”, as I described in my 1973 book THE
CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE DOLLAR. But the process was arrested part way
down because other aspects of the Master Plan for world domination
were slipping behind schedule. As I have related in detail in
previous tapes, factors such as the still concealed Fort Knox Gold
and Plutonium Scandals, reverses in the Middle East, Indira Gandhi’s
upset of the CIA in India, and other things have caused our Unseen
Rulers enormous difficulties for over 18 months. But time is running
out, and it is do-or-die for those who seek to enslave us. So now
the United States has at last been pried loose from its temporary
economic foothold and we are falling slowly but helplessly like a
dreamer in a nightmare toward the dreaded economic depression far
below. Politically, the phantom election plan I revealed last month
by which Nelson Rockefeller still plans to become America’s chief
executive is proceeding so far exactly as planned.
Sixty-eight per cent of the voting
precincts nation-wide had voting machines on November 2, 1976, and
where they jammed all across the country there was no provision for
paper ballots! Thousands of ballots were lost in certain areas, the
legality of thousands of others is being challenged, and re-counts
are under way in some places. The net result, exactly as planned,
was an extremely close popular vote and no landslide for anyone.
President Gerald Ford thought he had the election “in the bag”,
having been promised by Nelson Rockefeller that he would carry New
York State, but the pained expression on Ford’s face as his wife
delivered his concession statement on November 3 was nothing
compared to the shock that awaits Jimmy Carter if the plan now under
way succeeds. Meanwhile, as the stage is being set for economic and
political shocks in America, we drift ever closer to war and a
“Declaration of National Emergency” that could spell the end of our
freedoms, and the dangerous Intelligence gap created by Henry
Kissinger continues.
When I recorded monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 17 on October 26, last
month, I mentioned that the Soviet Union already knew where our lost
Phoenix Missile was in the North Sea but had not retrieved it. I had
just learned of the missile’s location and revealed it in that tape.
On October 27, the following day, as soon as the tape was released,
I also relayed it to Military Intelligence. That same day Navy
spokesmen told the press that they still had not located the
Phoenix; but using the information I relayed to them, the Navy found
and retrieved the Phoenix Missile on October 31. The United States
Government would have you believe it is mere coincidence that they
suddenly found the Phoenix after I revealed its location, even
though the Navy had spent six weeks in a fruitless search prior to
that!
There are also those who would have you believe that General George
S. Brown, the top military officer in the United States,
met with me for more than an hour on September 16, 1976 in his
Pentagon office out of idle curiosity. And especially there are many
who want you to believe there will be no reason for the Soviet Union
to do as I have charged, planting underwater-launched nuclear
missiles within our own territorial waters; but nothing, my friends,
could be further from the truth. What the Soviet Union has done and
is doing is completely logical and to be expected if we look at it
from their point of view. As Mrs. Margaret Thatcher, leader of the
Conservative Party in England, recently said, and I quote:
“The danger is our Western tendency
to assume that other people will apply our own standards and
values. When considering international matters, the important
thing is not to look at other nations as if we were standing in
their shoes but as if they were standing in their shoes.”
If you depend, as most Americans do, on
the controlled major media for your understanding of the world, you
will never learn to think this way nor can you hope to grasp the
real issues that govern military survival; yet such understanding is
essential if we are to see how to correct our dangerous situation.
One organization which in my opinion does do an excellent job of
clarifying matters of defense and national security is the American
Security Council located at Boston, Virginia. Their zip is 22713. I
recommend the Council as an excellent source of information for
every concerned American.
To help in understanding the threat we now face and how we got into
such a position, I will discuss the following three topics today:
-
Topic #1 - THE MUSHROOMING DEBATE
OVER SOVIET MILITARY POWER
-
Topic #2 - WHY THE SOVIET UNION WANTS
NUCLEAR WAR
-
Topic #3 - HOW GOVERNMENTAL AND PRESS
SECRECY ARE DESTROYING OUR CHANCES FOR PEACE.
Topic #1
- Secretary of State Henry Kissinger has
said over and over again for nearly a decade, quote:
“Detente, or nuclear holocaust;
there is no third way.”
With this in mind, public discussion of
American-Soviet relations has focused for years on the alleged happy
fruits of detente—the growing thaw between East and West, etc.—but
lately there has been an ominous change. President Ford dropped the
word “detente” from his active vocabulary, and mounting of concern
over the ragged condition of NATO forces has been expressed
increasingly by European and American leaders. Just last week two
so-called prestigious groups burst upon the public scene to churn up
controversy over the issues of mounting Soviet military power.
First, on November 11 came the “Committee for the Present Danger”
urging presumed President-elect Carter to increase military
spending, instead of decreasing it as promised during the election
campaign. Then three days later a study group financed by the
Rockefeller Foundation proposed the opposite—that we undertake joint
military reductions with the Soviet Union, perhaps initiating the
process with selected unilateral reductions of our own. And the
warnings continue!
Just three days ago a representative of Boeing Aerospace Company
testified before Congress that in case of nuclear war,
98% of the Soviet population would survive because of the elaborate
Civil Defense precautions being taken there. By
contrast, of course, the United States has no Civil Defense program
worthy of the name. Obviously detente is fading from the official
scene rapidly. According to the Kissinger formula, that means
nuclear holocaust is on its way. But where did he get that formula?
The word “detente” is just another word for what was termed
“peaceful coexistence” in the early 60’s, and the Kissinger formula
first emerged in October 1959 in the form, quote:
“Peaceful coexistence or nuclear
holocaust—there is no third way.”
But the speaker then was not Henry
Kissinger; it was Nikita Khrushchev.
The peaceful coexistence idea which later became so-called “detente”
began 20 years ago when Khrushchev announced a major new Soviet
policy line—namely, that war with the West was not inevitable after
all, contrary to the teachings of Lenin. Instead, the nuclear age
had made peaceful coexistence necessary. To most Westerners, this
sounded like “live and yet live”; but to the Soviet Union it meant
only the avoidance of a war which could destroy the Soviet Union. It
was all right to continue to break off chunks of the free world by
intrigue, subversion, and so-called “wars of national liberation”,
such as those which have occurred in Vietnam, Angola, and elsewhere.
The Soviet Union concentrated on selling the idea of peaceful
coexistence for five years from 1956 to 1961, ably assisted by their
allies here in the United States.
Then in 1961 a major new phase began as John F. Kennedy became
president of the United States. For decades the State Socialists,
who run the Soviet Union, had been in alliance with and supported by
the Corporate Socialists whose control over the United States was
drawing ever more complete. Now at long last the time was ripe to
launch their well-orchestrated joint program that was to lead to
complete dictatorial control of the United States by the Corporate
Socialists, Soviet conquest of vast areas of the world, piecemeal,
with Corporate Socialist assistance, and finally joint domination of
the entire world by the Rockefeller-Soviet alliance.
The basic idea of the program was for the strength and resolve of
the United States to be undermined and sapped while the Soviet Union
would be enabled to forge ahead into unprecedented world power.
Communism would be made to appear to be the wave of the future,
while American morale and faith in our free system of government
would be steadily eroded. Finally according to plan, the United
States would be in the process of increasing encirclement and
vulnerability, more and more countries becoming Soviet satellites
with the unseen help of American Corporate Socialists who would
share in the spoils. Economic disaster, military vulnerability, and
the collapse of our own self-confidence would, according to plan,
open the door for dictatorship here in America.
The single, most critical step in this long-range plan began to be
taken in 1961 - the progressive shut-off of critical research and
development programs for future military technology.
If research uncovers a basic new concept at a given point in time,
it will ordinarily be 5 to 15 years before it can be
translated into a new operational technology. In between theremust
be development, experimentation, evaluation, and full-scale
production programs. By the same token, if research and development
are cut off, at some point 5 to 15 years later you will not have the
new technology available that would otherwise have come into being.
Early justifications for the dwindling R&D program were based on
fond new hopes for disarmament in connection with the new Soviet
stance in favor of peaceful coexistence. Later, as the conflict in
Vietnam grew into a major war, it became easier to leave important
R&D items out of the already swollen Defense budget.
Another key ingredient in the overall plan was to be the use of
Cuban troops as proxies in Soviet so-called “wars of national
liberation” in Latin America and elsewhere. The Bay of Pigs invasion
in 1961, a few short months after Kennedy took office, could have
produced a serious setback for the Rockefeller-Soviet plans for
overthrow of numerous governments, so Kennedy’s advisers carefully
steered him away from making the invasion a success.
Meanwhile the Soviet Union constructed long-range plans to take
advantage of the American disadvantage in military technology that
was being arranged to occur in the mid-1970’s. While our R&D began
to decline, theirs accelerated. By knowing exactly what to expect,
the Soviet Union was able to target its military development toward
achievement of a dominant position 15 years later; and that time has
now arrived.
In 1962, however, a gamble by Nikita Khrushchev almost caused the
whole plan to come apart. For more than a year a prominent United
States Senator, Kenneth Keating, had been sounding warnings that
offensive nuclear missiles were being placed in Cuba by the Soviet
Union; but his charges were denied by the Administration, just as my
charges about Soviet underwater missiles are being plausibly denied
now. But President Kennedy finally decided to look into it himself
personally, instead of accepting blind assurances that there was
nothing to it from his advisers. He found out that the charges were
true and the Cuban Missile Crisis was upon us.
The Cuban Missile Crisis led to the elimination from the scene of
both Kennedy and Khrushchev. First, as I revealed in monthly AUDIO
LETTER No. 3 for August 1975, President Kennedy was murdered because
he was becoming increasingly dangerous to the Rockefeller-Soviet
alliance. He had come into office lacking any real grasp of the
realities of international politics—but he was learning, and
learning fast. It was clearly only a matter of time before he would
get around to reversing the cutoff of our critical R&D programs.
Already he was initiating steps intended
to turn off our involvement in Vietnam. Khrushchev, for his part,
took longer to oust since his power had to be chipped away carefully
by his enemies in the Kremlin; but finally he was removed for
jeopardizing the long-range plan of conquest with a dangerous gamble
that failed.
Looking ahead toward the increasing opportunities that would present
themselves for the Soviet Union to benefit at America’s expense, the
“Institute of the United States of America” was founded early in the
1960’s in Moscow. This Institute, whose purpose is to study the
vulnerabilities of the United States, was founded with the help of
financing from the Rockefeller Foundation.
Once the Oval Office was inhabited by Lyndon Johnson, the grand plan
proceeded onward without further difficulty!
Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara played an especially important
role in several ways. The period during which he served, from 1961
to 1968, was one in which research and development carried out prior
to the R&D cutoff would potentially be continuing to bear fruit; but
McNamara, doing the bidding of those who had placed him in that
position, succeeded in causing the cancellation of important
advanced weapons programs, decommissioning of many Defense
installations, physical scrapping of huge quantities of Defense
materiel, and costly concentration of effort on ill-fated programs,
such as the F-111 multipurpose Air Force Navy fighter.
He also championed the
impressive-sounding theory of warfare called “Measured Response”
which guaranteed the escalation of Vietnam into a major war by
preventing clear-cut, decisive wins in battle. As his reward for
such ‘valuable’ service, McNamara was made president of the World
Bank. Can you imagine?
With the inauguration of President Richard M. Nixon of January 20,
1969, the Kissinger era of foreign policy emerged in full bloom.
Kissinger had been an influential voice in Government since the
early 60’s, thanks to his association with Nelson Rockefeller that
began in 1955. Now he became one of the most important
Rockefeller-Soviet agents in the United States Government! Following
the outlines of the long-range plan, he became known as the
architect of so-called detente, repeating Khrushchev’s old
formula—“peaceful coexistence or nuclear holocaust”—almost verbatim.
In 1972 detente entered a new phase. The SALT I Agreement was signed
in Moscow by President Nixon in May of that year.
Meanwhile, the same year, the Soviet Union launched the massivein
Civil Defense that has lately started attracting attention. The
Soviet Union could see that the long awaited opportunity to pull
ahead of the United States was fast approaching. That same year,
1972, saw the expansion of so-called detente to Red China. Kissinger
also played a central role in this development; but far from
promoting real peace, Kissinger was undoing a golden opportunity for
freedom for a quarter of the world’s people—and possibly peace for
the entire world.
What I am about to tell you is top secret, and I am revealing it for
the very first time.
Some years ago an international entrepreneur (whom I will call
“Smith”) was in the act of selling a large European bank when he was
approached by a Chinese on a business venture involving a retired
Chinese general (whom I will call “Lee”). Lee had known both Chiang
Kai-shek and Mao Tse-tung very well during earlier revolutionary
days, and was still closely associated with six regional military
chieftains in Red China who were all genuinely anti-Soviet in every
way. Moreover, after the turmoil that took place in Red China in
1957 and later, these Chinese military chieftains became completely
disenchanted and disgusted with Mao’s program of using young
hoodlums to terrorize and murder all suspected opposition to his
dictatorial and oppressive programs. Mao’s euphemistic term,
cultural revolution, for these cutthroat methods of bending the
people to his will, did not impress them. They contacted Lee and
queried him as to the possibility of getting American support in
case they should decide to overthrow Mao and establish a republic
using the customary parliamentary form of government. Those who
preferred the security of Socialism would be allowed to live in
communes, but the government would foster a free-market system for
the country as a whole.
General Lee arranged through the United States Department of State
to send envoys through the Bamboo Curtain to make the necessary
arrangements; but someone in the State Department leaked the
information to Red Chinese officials, and all of the envoys were
quickly apprehended and put to death. Nevertheless General Lee
persisted. He asked Mr. Smith if he could arrange for broadcasting
equipment to inform all of Red China what was taking place, why the
military deemed it necessary to overturn Mao, and what form of
government would be established. Smith agreed to contact certain top
officials in the United States Government close to the President,
however General Lee emphasized that he must circumvent Henry
Kissinger and get the ear of Mr. Nixon only, since Lee did not trust
Kissinger nor anyone else in the State Department.
The contacts were made, but
unfortunately a member of another agency heard of the plan and
briefed President Nixon about it in front of Kissinger. Almost
immediately arrangements were made for Kissinger to visit China to
meet secretly with Mao.
This meeting took place, and at the meeting Kissinger informed Mao
that he would be overthrown by a military coup unless Mao’s regime
chose to cooperate with those who held the real power in the United
States. To sweeten the deal for Mao, certain secret agreements were
made concerning the future course of American relationships with the
Republic of China on Taiwan. The outgrowth of the meeting was
ping-pong diplomacy—the Nixon summit trip to Peking in February
1972, and so-called detente between Red China and the United States.
In return, Mao Tse-tung’s ironhanded
dictatorship over Red China was rendered secure once again. Red
China would thus continue to be a controllable threat to the Soviet
Union. With any real threat to the Soviet Union from the direction
of Red China taken care of, the Rockefeller-Soviet plan continued.
Last year the Helsinki Accord gave the Soviet Union essentially what
she had wanted for 20 years—a ratification of her conquests in
Eastern Europe. By thus signaling to the imprisoned countries behind
the Iron Curtain that we consider them to be within the Soviet
sphere, we reduce any tendency they might have to revolt in case of
war. The Soviet western flank is thus made far more secure than
before.
In the past several years, countries have been falling into the
Soviet orbit at a quickening pace with their domination shared
secretly by their Corporate Socialist allies here in America. At the
same time, the declining military might of the United States and the
fast increasing threat from the Soviet Union has finally become too
obvious to hide any longer. This stage, too, was foreseen and
planned.
All of the economic, political, and military factors are intended to
lead to a “Declaration of National Emergency” here in America,
dictatorship, and war!
But, as it turned out, there is a terrible joker in the deck that
has been dealt by the Rockefeller empire in its hidden collaboration
with the Soviet Union. The war to come, NUCLEAR WAR ONE waged
primarily on American soil, was supposed to be neatly limited and
controlled with a “Nuclear Safe Zone” set aside for the Soviet
allies here in America, as I revealed in monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 12
last May; but the Soviet Union has for months been maneuvering to
carry out a double cross at this critical stage in America’s
increasing vulnerability. They want to seize all the marbles for
themselves.
Topic #2
- For many years American strategic
defense strategy has been based on a concept called “Mutual Assured
Destruction”, or MAD.
The idea here is that should either the
Soviet Union or the United States launch a nuclear attack on the
other, the victim of the attack would be able to destroy the
attacker in return. In this concept, furthermore, the targets are
cities, not military targets such as enemy missile installations. An
ICBM attack under these conditions would have only one basic
purpose—to kill tens of millions of innocent civilians. This is the
so-called “balance of terror” we often hear about.
In World War II, Hitler used V-1 buzz bombs and V-2 missiles in
exactly this way against the civilian population of England instead
of against military targets, thinking to terrorize England into
submission. But as we all know, it didn’t work. The British learned
to dig into bomb shelters, absorb the civilian deaths and damage,
and meanwhile redoubled their efforts at military installations to
strike back at Hitler in more important ways.
The MAD mutual terror defense strategy is nothing more than a
nuclear age version of the very technique that was proven to be
useless over 30 years ago. We’ve all heard countless times, quote:
“The last thing the Soviet Union would ever want is a nuclear
exchange with the United States.” This comforting statement tends to
make one accept the foolish MAD defense doctrine, if it is to be
believed; but it is wrong. The announcement by Nikita Khrushchev in
1956 that all-out war was not inevitable with the West after all,
appeared to be a renunciation of a basic Leninist principle, but it
was not. It was simply the beginning of an elaborate 20-year ploy to
make us lower our guard so that when the inevitable all-out conflict
did come, the Soviet Union would be in a position to win. History is
repeating itself. In the late 1930’s many people made the mistake of
believing that Hitler did not actually want war but was willing to
risk it in order to obtain concessions, so the concessions were made
with the idea that this would prevent war. Only too late was it
realized that Hitler was determined to have a war one way or
another.
In the past, the Soviet Union has been notably cautious when
skirting the fringes of a possible nuclear war, but that was while
she was still at a disadvantage militarily. Now for the first time
the Soviets are emerging into a totally new situation in which their
military power is second to none. With the rapid collapse of free
governments now occurring around the globe, the over-all correlation
of forces, as they call it, is shiftingin favor of the Soviet Union.
The Soviet Union is now No. 1 in military power, while the United
States is No. 2 - a situation that has never existed before.
The time is now ripe for the Soviets to press their advantage in an
effort to seize control of the world. The standing threat from Red
China is often mentioned hopefully as a major factor tending to
offset any Soviet ideas of waging major war against us; but this,
too, is in error. The Soviet fear of Red China, far from acting as a
brake, is spurring them on. Right now Red China is leaning on the
United States; but should the United States be knocked out of action
by a Soviet hammer blow before China could take advantage of the
situation, China would then be isolated. Red China would then have
no choice but to patch things up with the Soviet Union and
cooperate, at least on pragmatic matters. Of course with the United
States defeated, and the two Communist superpowers joining forces
once again, the fate of the rest of the world would no longer be in
question. Thus, as I stated in monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 15, if we
fall, the world falls; and that is the basis of Soviet strategy.
Thus the Soviet Union does want nuclear war with the United States
provided the Soviet Union is prepared to survive with losses limited
to acceptable levels, and provided the United States can be
destroyed as a military rival in the process. The Soviet rulers
emphatically do not think of nuclear war as something that could
only happen as the unwanted result of a confrontation, even though
this is how we tend to think of it. To them war, including nuclear
war, is a tool of conquest to be used whenever it is advantageous to
do so.
People have asked the question: Why would the Soviet Union plant
underwater missiles in our waters when they already have ICBMs,
missile-launching submarines, and so forth? Even some officials who
know about the Soviet missiles raise this question in various forms
as a smoke screen to create doubt. For once you understand the basic
Soviet viewpoint I have described, the reasons for the planting of
underwater missiles become far easier to grasp.
To begin with, the underwater missiles constitute a first-strike
capability for the Soviet Union—that is, they are concentrated on
military targets. Specifically, they are intended to wipe out our
naval bases, major ports, and a good fraction of our naval fleet in
one sudden, surprise blow without advance warning. This type of
first strike is quite different from those usually discussed, but
would be extremely effective. Consider the choice faced by an
American president immediately after such a sudden strike by the
Soviet Union by means of its underwater missiles followed by a
Soviet ultimatum to surrender! True, the American naval forces at
sea around the world at the time of the attack would be unaffected
and our missile subs could give the Soviet Union an unpleasant
pasting. Even our ICBMs might still be available to fire, but what
then?
First, the damage we could now inflict on the Soviet Union would be
minimized by the mammoth Civil Defense preparations that have been
under way in the Soviet Union for five years and more. If the
president did choose to counterattack, several million Soviet
citizens would possibly die and a small portion of the military and
industrial facilities of the Soviet Union not underground would be
destroyed. But the vast majority of the Soviet population would
survive our counterattack as would a large part of their
military-industrial complex. Now it would be their turn again.
The price we would pay for disobeying the Soviet ultimatum would be
awesome. A salvo of ICBMs, not the whole Soviet ICBM force, perhaps
but a few hundred nonetheless, would rain down on the United States,
hitting both military targets and big cities. Thanks to the well
named MAD defense strategy we have followed, we have no Civil
Defense and the carnage would be beyond imagination, especially
since Soviet nuclear warheads are many times more powerful than
ours.
As for our naval forces, attacks by Soviet antiship cruise missiles
would rapidly take their toll; and the inability of returning to
port for fuel and more weapons would cause our navy to wither away
as a fighting force. It would only be a matter of time until our
vital sea lanes of commerce were totally destroyed. The process
might continue perhaps for some time, but the outcome would not be
in doubt. The Soviet Union would be able to outlast us and outblast
us once the initial crucial strike against our navy was made with
the underwater missiles.
The secret of success of the Soviet plan is their use of a weapon
system that would enable the first strike against our navy to be a
complete surprise with extremely reliable results. The greatest
possible surprise, of course, would have been achieved if our navy
had never even known the missiles were there off our shores until
the moment they were fired. That was the surprise element that my
monthly AUDIO LETTERS Nos. 14 and 15 were intended to remove last
summer.
Another element of surprise has to do with the warning time if a
missile is actually launched. With ICBMs, satellite surveillance can
provide a warning time of 20 minutes or so—plenty of time to launch
our own missiles in retaliation if the decision is made to do so.
Submarine-launched ballistic missiles may cut the warning time to a
few minutes. But in the case of the short-range underwater-launch
missiles, there is virtually no warning at all since they must
travel only a short distance and the time of flight is brief. By the
time they are detected and our defenses alerted, they will be
exploding over their targets.
There is only one other kind of warning, which is probably the most
important of all—advance warning of impending attack through
Intelligence channels and through reading the meaning of political
tensions. Up to now, for example, NATO defense planning has assumed
that any attack on Western Europe by the Soviet Union would be
preceded by a warning of at least three weeks. And 35 years ago
there were several advance warnings before the attack on Pearl
Harbor beginning a week or so ahead of time, but at that time these
warnings were deliberately blocked at high levels of the United
States Government because certain individuals wanted to insure that
the attack did occur! And now the chance of obtaining advance
warning of impending attack is once again reduced, thanks to the
Intelligence gap created by Secretary of State Henry Kissinger!
When the Soviet Union decides the time is ripe to attack, they do
not intend to telegraph their intentions in advance. In this regard,
the underwater missiles lurking along our shores can be invaluable
to them. Their ICBMs have too long a warning time and insufficient
accuracy and reliability for the Soviet rulers to employ them with
full confidence in a world-wide naval Pearl Harbor attack, such as I
described in monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 15. And if they chose to use
their missile-launching submarines for that purpose closing in to
short range to produce short flight times for their missiles, they
would risk alerting our navy that something was up because of the
peculiar deployment of their submarines.
On top of that, a world-wide surprise attack of the kind
contemplated by the Soviets depends for its success on a
simultaneous strike everywhere. Not an easy thing to achieve with
missiles launched by numerous submarines all over the world; but the
underwater missiles are made to order for a surprise attack. They
lurk unseen for days, weeks, or months until they are needed; then
when they are to be fired, the preparations for the attack can be
made without any outward sign at all, deep inside a Command Post in
the Soviet Union. To launch the attack itself, a signal need only be
flashed world-wide from the Command Post, while the observable
activities of the Soviet Union, military and otherwise, proceed in
normal patterns giving no hint of the impending attack!
When the surprise attack plan of the Soviet Union is known, the
question is no longer: Why would they plant those underwater
missiles? The question becomes: Why wouldn’t they do it?
The Soviet Union is prepared to wage war with several times our own
nuclear firepower. At the same time, they are prepared to survive
such a war as a viable society with population losses of perhaps no
more than 2%. That’s around five-million lives, and it is indeed
very hard for you and me to imagine deliberately accepting such
losses for a political purpose. But remember, the Soviet bosses
think their way, not our way; and if they were to suffer losses that
large, our own losses could be 50- to 100-million!
Provided they have the ability to disable the United States Navy at
the outset with the surprise attack they have planned, the Soviets
believe they have little to lose and everything to gain now by their
standards in a nuclear war; and that is why the Soviet Union wants
nuclear war now.
Topic #3
- Since early July 1976 short-wave radio
communications world-wide have been disrupted by what one ham radio
operator describes as, quote: “A super-enormous strong signal that
sounds like a buzz saw.” Not only hams have been affected but
maritime, aeronautical, and telecommunications channels have been
rendered practically useless in some cases. The signal is a rasping
sound that pulses 10 times per second, originating from Soviet
transmitters.
The monitoring branch of the Federal Communications Commission has
received a flood of complaints and has written four complaints to
Moscow about it, without any reply whatsoever. According to Robert
Kutz, chief of the FCC’s International Operations Division, this
silence from the Soviet Union is very unusual, quote: “Usually they
have been very cooperative, unless there’s something particularly
unique about this situation.” Indeed there is something unique about
these Soviet radio signals, my friends. They are transmissions
between Moscow and Soviet submarines world-wide by means of the
Advanced Communications System I mentioned in a recent monthly AUDIO
LETTER. It is no accident that these signals first began early in
July 1976. That was the month when I first revealed the existence of
underwater missiles in American and Canadian territorial waters
planted by the Soviets. It is also no accident that transmissions
like this were first heard in 1962 during the Cuban Missile Crisis.
The Government professes not to have any idea what these signals are
all about, but they know better. These signals are being used to
maintain tight coordination of Soviet naval activities, especially
submarine movements, in preparation for war. But one lie leads to
another; and just as you are not being told about the Soviet
underwater missiles that threaten your life and your freedom, you
are not being told the true meaning of the Soviet buzz saw signals.
There are at least 13 transmitters broadcasting these powerful
signals located mostly in Soviet or Soviet-occupied territory.
Transmitters are operating at Archangel, Leningrad, Moscow, Kiev,
Odessa, Gdansk, the Bosporus Straits, Rostov, Minsk, Warsaw, Prague,
East Berlin, and of all places Loch Ness in Scotland. The Loch Ness
transmitter is aboard a small submarine that entered the northeast
end of Loch Ness by means of the canal that connects Loch Ness to
Moray Firth. If there wasn’t one before, there certainly is a Loch
Ness monster now, compliments of the Soviet Union.
These Soviet transmissions make use of a technique known as “pulse
modulation.” Each of the 10 pulses per second sounds like nothing
more than a meaningless rasp to the ear, but in fact each pulse
contains a superimposed signal in code. The possible codes are
endless, and a computer is required both to create the coded pulses
for transmissions and to decode them where they are received.
Therefore unless and until Intelligence information becomes
available on the details of the exact code, it is practically
impossible to intercept and understand the Soviet messages to their
subs.
But matters even more blatant than the Soviet mysterious signals are
being hidden from you. For example: Do you know about the joint
Soviet and Cuban naval and aviation maneuvers that took place from
September 15 to September 23, 1976, in the Caribbean and the Gulf of
Mexico? These war games utilized not only the new Soviet submarine
base at Cienfuegos Harbor not far from the United States naval
station at Guantanamo Bay but also Marianao and Havana, right across
from Florida! These war exercises carried a clear threat for the
Panama Canal, Puerto Rico, and our base at Guantanamo Bay; and, in
addition, ranged all along our Gulf coast as far west as Galveston,
Texas. Yet our so-called Defense Department said not one word about
it, and our sleeping press, following the non-existent lead of our
controlled major media, said nothing about it either. Since “Red
Friday”, October 1, 1976, our Military from General George S. Brown
on down have been muzzled, ordered to flatly deny charges about
Soviet missiles in our waters, if pressed to comment on them.
Meanwhile, top secret Civil Defense
exercises are now under way here in Washington, D.C. and other
sensitive areas for top Government officials only, while the rest of
our people are left in the dark not only without protection but
without even any official warning that war could be imminent! But
the last straw came in just the past several days, my friends. Last
month I reported that immediately after the “Red Friday”
capitulation by President Ford to the Soviet demands advanced by
Andrei Gromyko, Soviet submarines along our east and west coasts
performed a chemical warfare experiment. Clouds of radioactive
plutonium were released into our atmosphere to drift inward and
contaminate the United States while the United States Government
cooperated by claiming that we were being plastered with radioactive
fallout from a Chinese nuclear test 10 days earlier. As I reported
last month, we were spared major effects from that experimental
plutonium release due to weather conditions that did not behave as
predicted by the Soviets. But now they are poised to do it again!
On Wednesday November 17 a large Chinese atmospheric hydrogen bomb
test was announced, and immediately we were inundated with
announcements that the radioactive cloud would reach our west coast
only three short days later—today, November 20, 1976. Last time they
claimed that the Chinese cloud took 10 days to cover the same
distance, but that was because the Soviet subs were not ready at
that time to use the Chinese blast as a cover for their chemical
attack against us. This time they can hardly wait.
As of noon yesterday, November 19, 18 Soviet submarines were
deployed at even intervals along our west coast within about 35
miles of our shore line. They are not missile launchers but are
equipped specifically for the injection of plutonium into our air
today. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is telling us not
to fear the Chinese nuclear cloud alleged to be passing over our
country, but is cooperating completely with the Soviet Unionin
providing a totally false cover for the Soviet radioactive plutonium
attack on our country! In actual fact, the radioactivity created by
the Chinese test itself has not yet gone beyond Red China’s own
borders.
The media are reminding us how terrible Swine Flu might be, and we
are also being told of the disappointingly low number of eligible
Americans who are taking the free Government Swine Flu shots. We are
told that Swine Flu, if it breaks out, could spread like wildfire;
and now certain persons in the United States Government are
cooperating with the Soviet Union in an attack on our nation by
means of radioactive plutonium, the effects of which can be mistaken
for severe “flu” if intended dosages are achieved.
My friends, the so-called mysterious signals from the Soviet Union
stopped temporarily on November 2, but then on November 10 they
started up again because Soviet war preparations were resuming.
Since I talked with you last, 36 new missiles have been planted in
our waters in addition to those I referred to last month.
I have not given the locations of these to anyone, and for now I do
not intend to do so. Now let me tell you why. On one hand there are
those factions within the shell of a Government left here in
Washington who are actively cooperating with the Soviet Union. Some
of these are outright Soviet agents; others are part of the
Corporate Socialist network that cooperates with the Soviets for
mutual advantage at the expense of the rest of us. Some in this
second group still do not believe that a Soviet double cross has
been under way for months in the form of the underwater missiles in
our waters. On the other hand, there are many who are honestly
trying to counter the Soviet underwater missile threat acting within
constraints imposed on them. Prior to October 1, missiles were being
removed as they were planted by the Soviet Union, acting on
information I was providing to General George S. Brown and to
Military Intelligence. In this capacity, I have been acting as an
information channel to go around the Intelligence gap created by
Henry Kissinger.
But where is all this leading? What will happen if traitors in our
midst continue to cover up the truth about the Soviet underwater
missiles, and if patriots in our Government cannot summon the
courage to tell the truth, regardless of the consequences? What is
going to happen if that situation continues, my friends, is
THERMONUCLEAR WAR and DICTATORSHIP here in America!
Even if the United States Navy were to continue removing Soviet
missiles as they are planted—which they have been ordered NOT to do
since October 1 - this would not prevent disaster. The Soviet Union
is able to plant missiles far faster than we can remove them. So the
information I have been relaying is really being used now for just
one purpose—to enable our leaders to keep abreast of the chances of
attack, and to minimize those chances until they are ready to run
and hide in the 96 underground cities of the “Federal Relocation
Arc” to ride out the war—then war can come, scorching the land and
consuming our people.
The top-secret information provided me by my sources, often at the
risk of their own lives, is not intended for the private use of
cold-blooded traitors and spineless leaders in the American
Government. It is intended to bring about exposure of the truth as
the one and only thing that can prevent a war.
If war comes, it will be a devastating surprise to most Americans.
The perverse behavior of our public officials in misusing my
information threatens to condemn millions of us to a nuclear
holocaust. Therefore it is only right that they condemn themselves
at the same time. Without the missile locations I am now withholding
they, too, will be caught in the lightning surprise attack by the
Soviet Union that threatens to engulf the rest of us. Millions of
our lives apparently mean nothing at all to them compared to their
service to the Soviet Union, and their jobs, and their pensions. But
now their lives are at stake along with the rest of us. Only if the
truth about the Soviet underwater missiles is exposed will I turn
over the new information I have on which not only our lives but
theirs, too, now depend.
Until next month, God willing, this is Dr. Beter. Thank you, and may
God bless each and every one of you.
|