Audio
Letter #24
Hello, my friends, this is Dr. Beter. Today is May 28, 1977 and this
is my monthly Audioletter No. 24. This issue concludes the second
year of the Audio-letter. But only if we are blessed by a true
miracle, will the third year ever be completed, because as I speak
to you today a tragedy has already been set in motion that is beyond
human comprehension. Not since last July and August, 1976 when the
Soviet Union began planting underwater bombs and missiles in our own
territorial waters has the situation been so grave and urgent as it
is now. For that reason I will dispense with any further
introduction today in order to discuss these three topics: Topic
#1 - The Fall of Babylon Revisited; Topic #2 - The Handwriting On The
Wall For America; and Topic #3 - WATER, THE ULTIMATE WEAPON. Topic
#1 - We live today in a world that grows more complex and more
confusing with each passing day, but in spite of that we Americans
are fond of praising ourselves for the great man-made wonders of our
age. And whenever the obvious dangers to our continued existence as
a nation prey on our minds, we are always reminded that we, the
great United States, have already survived fully two centuries since
our Republic was founded. And scarcely a day goes by that we are not
reassured by our rulers, elected and otherwise, that we are the
mightiest nation on earth.
Our technology, we are told day in and
day out, is so wonderful that it is impossible that any other nation
on earth, especially the poor, backward Soviet Union, might surpass
us in any important way. In other words, we are technologically
impregnable. And lest we become prematurely concerned over the
impact of the recent radical changes in our weather, certain news
reports recently have told incredible lies to the effect that the
United States has a two-year surplus of grains in our storage bins.
In all of this, the behavior of the United States today is like that
of countless civilizations before us—just before they perished. And
in some respects the greatest similarity of all is with that of
ancient Babylon just before its abrupt fall from power. The origins
of the United States, unlike Babylon, were strongly moral and
spiritual in content, and the system of government set forth in the
United States Constitution, which freed men in a way unparalleled in
human history, was conceived by men who understood man’s place
within God’s creation. This heritage still lives today in the hearts
of many Americans, but it’s rapidly being snuffed out under the
bondage of rulers who are superimposing the pattern of ancient
Babylon on our beloved land. The Babylonian pattern is totally evil,
and those who choose to bow down to such Satanic rule thereby make
themselves part of it.
The origins of ancient Babylon are lost in the midst of time,
perhaps 5,000 years ago, but it reached its peak around 600 B.C., at
which time it was undisputed as the most powerful empire theworld
had ever seen. The City of Babylon was the Rome of its day, the most
important trading center, the most powerful military force, the
greatest cultural influence, and even a center of tourism because of
its remarkable hanging gardens and other man-made wonders. The huge
city of Babylon was surrounded by city walls so high and so thick
that they were impregnable by any military technology of that day;
and inside the city there was a two-year supply of food, making any
attempted siege against Babylon unattractive. And there was no lack
of water either, because no less than the mighty river Euphrates ran
through the city. Yes, Babylon was powerful, wealthy, and so secure
in material terms that potential adversaries were hardly even taken
seriously. Even when it became clear that the increasingly powerful
joint empire of the Medes and the Persians had designs on Babylon,
there was no real concern. With all their means of protection
against invasion and their unrivaled prosperity, the Babylonian
attitude was simply “It couldn’t happen here.”
And so when the Medo-Persian army of
Cyrus and Darius laid siege to Babylon, the only response of the
ruler of Babylon was debauchery, feasting, drunkenness, and mocking
any real power greater than himself. At this point, we’re told, the
Babylonian feast was interrupted by the appearance of a hand in
midair writing words on the wall that said Babylon’s rule was at an
end, that its ruler had been weighed in the balances and found
wanting, and that the kingdom would be divided and given to the
Medes and Persians. The handwriting on the wall said the impossible
was about to happen—Babylon, the impregnable city, was about to
fall—How could this be? No one in Babylon had ever had experience
with invasion and so could not imagine such a thing; and yet, within
a few short hours, before the drunken feast even ended, the
impossible happened. First, the water level in the mighty Euphrates
river, flowing through the middle of Babylon, started dropping
rapidly. It dwindled to a trickle, and soon stopped altogether.
Cyrus, the Persian, had worked out of sight of Babylon and had
diverted the Euphrates out of its normal channel.
Now the great impregnable walls of
Babylon were left with huge openings—namely, the river bed no longer
filled with water, and in marched the Medo-Persian army, conquering
Babylon without resistance. And today, the United States is under
siege by the Soviet Union with the cooperation from within of
quislings. We are threatened by the joint Rockefeller/ Soviet empire
just as Babylon was besieged by the joint Medo-Persian empire. And
now, as then, we are told there is nothing to worry about, “It just
couldn’t happen here.” But, my friends, just as happened in ancient
Babylon, the handwriting is now on the wall for America. The America
we know today is a perversion of the pattern originally laid down
for our beloved land, and America as we know it is about to come to
an end. And as with ancient Babylon, WATER is our Achilles heel and
the means by which we are to be reduced to surrender without a
fight.
Topic #2
- Not long ago the Carter
administration’s Ambassador to the United Nations, Andy Young, made
the remarkable statement that: “Communism has never been a threat to
me.” He also has a habit of patting Cuba on the back for the
so-called ‘stabilizing influence’ of Cuban troops in Africa, and
otherwise has repeatedly shown a very amiable attitude toward World
Communism.
Many Americans have wondered why Andy Young is allowed to go on
saying such things without being restrained in any way by Jimmy
Carter. But Carter has now answered that, in a major foreign policy
speech given at the University of Notre Dame on May 22, 1977. This
speech is as important as the famous Iron Curtain Speech of Sir
Winston Churchill a generation ago at Fulton, Missouri. White House
aides stated that the Carter speech at Notre Dame was specifically
intended to “send some messages to foreign governments”—and it did.
The foreign press is filled with headlines about the major turn that
has just been taken in American foreign policy. Yet, here at home,
many Americans have not grasped what has happened. The most basic
theme of that Carter speech is an elaborate echo of Andy Young’s
statement, that is: “We are no longer afraid of Communism.” Is this
because Communism is withering and dying? One need only look at a
map to
see how fast Communism is eating up the world.
What Jimmy Carter is telling us and the
world, is ‘We can get along with Communism’; and just to prove it,
one of America’s most important, efficient intelligence operations
to keep an eye on Soviet naval movements and other important matters
is being closed down. This intelligence unit, known as Task Force
157 and run by the United States Navy, has a budget of well under
1/10 of 1% of that of the CIA, and yet it is being shut
down—supposedly for budgetary reason. Meanwhile the signs of war to
come are all around us. So great are the dangers facing us that
military men are speaking up in increasing numbers in an effort to
warn America before disaster arrives. Since they are subject to
military law and subordinate to civilians who do not want them to
speak up, it’s no small thing to speak out in this way. So, consider
what Major General John K. Singlaub said in an interview on May 19,
1977. General Singlaub, the third-ranking U.S. Army General in Korea
said: “If we withdraw our ground forces on the schedule suggested,
it will lead to war.” And why did General Singlaub speak up? His
answer was: “The question asked after United States setbacks in
Korea and Vietnam was: ‘Did the military people in the know express
themselves loudly and clearly enough that the decision-makers
understood?’ We want to make sure.”
In speaking this way, General Singlaub
was doing no more than expressing the consensus of practically every
knowledgeable military man about the Korean situation. For example,
the same Washington Post article that quoted General Singlaub also
quoted another headquarters Army officer in Korea as saying about
the Carter plan to withdraw our troops: “I don’t know anybody who is
not staggered by it. There’s no military or strategic logic for
withdrawal.” The plan to withdraw from South Korea, in other words,
is strictly political—in line with the newly-announced American
foreign policy that it is no longer afraid of Communism. The reason
General Singlaub’s words had such an impact in this country is that
his name was attached to his warnings. The words I just quoted from
the other anonymous Army Officer are just as startling as what
General Singlaub said.
But people will just read those words
once, frown, and then forget about it. But everyone knows about
General Singlaub’s warnings because, deliberately or otherwise, he
allowed himself to be identified as the source of the warnings; and,
for daring to warn us, he was promptly relieved of his Korean
command by Jimmy Carter. The situation in Korea illustrates the
direction in which events are now moving, but other events are due
to occur long before the pullout of our troops from South Korea. The
real threat to our security is no longer in Korea or in Europe but
right here in our own backyard.
Another military man who is actively trying to warn America is Major
General George Keegan, who retired at the beginning of this year as
Chief of Air Force Intelligence. General Keegan is one of the West’s
greatest intelligence analysts, and the story he has to tell should
be continuous headline news throughout our nation. General Keegan
has been speaking on radio and television talk shows, giving
speeches, accepting interviews—in short, using every channel open to
him in an effort to wake up America before it is too late. One of
his most comprehensive and important speeches was the one delivered
on March 11, 1977, at a press conference sponsored by the American
Security Council here in Washington, D.C. To find out in more detail
what General Keegan had to say, I would urge every American to
obtain a copy of that speech. Write to the American Security
Council, Boston, Va., 22713 for information. It was published as the
April 1977 Washington Report of the American Security Council. We’re
frequently told by syndicated columnists that the CIA is our first
line of defense, but General Keegan said in his speech:
“The ultimate function of a nation’s
intelligence is to render carefully assessed judgments and
forecasts regarding the threat. When I look back upon my
experience with this nation’s highest estimating body, I have
the impression of having taken part in a Charles Dickens novel.
The sense of make-believe and unreality has to be experienced to
be believed.”
Further on he says:
“The intelligence estimators,
heavily dominated by the CIA and the State Department, have been
wrong about Soviet purposes in pursuing detente. They have been
shockingly deficient in their estimates of the risks and the
advantages to the United States and the free world of the
so-called technology exchange with the Soviet Union.”
And he adds:
“If there has been a Watergate in
this country, and there has been, but ignored, it has been in
the monumentally incompetent judgmental processes of this
government regarding the nature, character, and growth of the
Soviet threat as it has evolved from year to year.”
General Keegan goes on to make crystal
clear that the deficiencies in our intelligence estimates are not
due to any lack of our ability to collect information or to analyze
it technically. The problem, instead, has to do with what is done
with that information. To begin with, the intelligence estimation
process at the highest levels in America today is not objective, but
is manipulated to fit political purposes. In General Keegan’s words,
and I quote:
“The United States intelligence
estimative process cannot be understood unless it is first
appreciated that national intelligence estimates must perform
three functions. First, they must support the decisions of the
President, both for the record of history and for the avoidance
of impeachment. Second, they must substantiate or help to
justify the decisions of the White House ‘Office of Management
and Budget.’ Finally, the intelligence estimates must, whatever
other purpose they may serve, rationalize the foreign security
policy initiatives of the Secretary of State.”
Continuing, General Keegan says:
“I appreciate that those are
extremely important allegations to make, but I submit to you
today that it is not possible to understand the workings of the
United States intelligence community unless one is willing to
open his mind to the influence of those three factors.”
This situation is illustrated vividly by
General Keegan’s discussion of the controversy over the Soviet
Back-Fire Bomber. As I’ve told you for many months, the Supersonic
Back-Fire is an inter-continental strategic bomber, capable of
striking the United States with nuclear weapons. General Keegan
says:
“The central issue all along has
been whether this bomber posed a threat to the United States.
The Soviets argued that it did not, and the CIA and State
Department rather consistently accepted the Soviet point of
view.”
General Keegan proceeded to acquire
analysis of the Back-Fire’s capability from “the most competent
analysts in the free world.” The available intelligence information
was provided to three American aircraft companies with experience
building strategic bombers—plus, for good measure, the Royal Air
Force and the Royal Aircraft establishment in England—and the
results: “every single one of these organizations independently
agreed that the Back-Fire had an intercontinental capability. Yet my
word was not good enough, nor was that of the American and British
heavy-bomber designers and builders. CIA and State chose to believe
the Soviets.”
General Keegan is not in a position to
express it this way, my friends, but his description of the
Back-Fire controversy illustrates what I’ve been trying to tell you
over the months—that the Rockefeller cartel has more faith in the
Soviet Union than in our own United States. Finally, General Keegan
explains, the sheer weight of analysis made it more and more
apparent that the Back-Fire was truly intercontinental: “however,
CIA and State now judged that the Soviet Union had no intention of
using the Back-Fire as an intercontinental bomber”—this in spite of
the fact that the second model of the Back-Fire has been given even
greater range. The history of the Back-Fire controversy up to this
point is very disgraceful, and still generally unknown to the
American people.
But listen now to the final chapter in General Keegan’s words, and I
quote: “Seemingly undaunted by the most extensive analysis of a
foreign bomber ever performed in the United States, the CIA, in one
final, super-secret, uncoordinated effort, proceeded over a period
of 18 months to undertake an analysis designed to prove that the
Back-Fire Bomber could not reach the United States. This effort, in
which small bits and pieces of controlled information were provided
to McDonnell-Douglas Aircraft, designer and builder of fighters,
represents one of the most artful contrivances I have ever observed.
It is one which I suspect may have been designed to salvage a SALT
accord. Finally, when the CIA surprised everyone by surfacing its
new analysis, months of painful and extensive analysis were required
to show that the books had been rigged. Artificially high G-loadings
had been assigned to the design of the Back-Fire along with
excessive engine-drag and other factors which were designed to
reduce range.” And this, my friends, is how our so-called first line
of defense, the CIA, looks after America’s national security to the
tune of over twenty billion dollars a year.
Elsewhere in his talk General Keegan also spells out the dangerous
manner in which our military intelligence capabilities have been
progressively over-centralized, compartmentalized, and taken over by
civilians “who understand little about the horrors of war—and these
are people who understand even less about military doctrine,
strategy, and weapons.” The product of all these trends described by
General Keegan is the very intelligence gap that I discussed with
General George S. Brown, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, when
I met with him last September (1976). For years General Keegan has
tried in vain to obtain a series of post-mortem audits on the
predictive and estimative record of the United States intelligence
community. The audit would be performed by qualified but
disinterested outsiders with no links to the intelligence community
so that their work would be unbiased. Quoting General Keegan again:
“Such audits would record scrupulously where we had been wrong,
where we had been right, where we had fallen short of the mark or
where we had exaggerated. Yet, every such suggestion had been met
with disdain and has been resisted in the most resounding vocal and
emotional way.” He might as well have asked for an honest audit of
Fort Knox.
General Keegan’s speech contains many more things than there is time
to discuss in this tape, and they’re all important. He reveals many
things about the military capabilities of both the Soviet Union and
the United States that you will never hear through the usual news
channels, but they all boil down to just two major conclusions,
backed up by many, many facts. One conclusion is that Soviet
military capabilities vastly exceed what we are being led to
believe, both in terms of quantity and quality. The other conclusion
is that the Soviet Union is firmly convinced that a nation can fight
a nuclear war and continue afterward as a functioning society; and
based on that conclusion from a Soviet study undertaken after World
War II, the Soviet Union has for more than 20 years been preparing
militarily to fight and win a nuclear war. The American approach, on
the other hand, is only to deter such a war, even though General
Keegan says:
“I am unaware of a single
definitive effort ever conducted by the United States to
determine precisely and in great detail what it would take to
deter.”
General Keegan also explains another
very important principle—it has to do with official judgments of the
strategic
balance and carries over into public pronouncements by the Pentagon.
This is the tacit rule requiring the use of so-called ‘agreed
national intelligence.’ Says General Keegan:
“Agreed national intelligence
is derived by committee, contains little that is controversial
except in some footnote or dissent; and it rarely contains
meaningful reference to the dynamics of strategic competition in
terms of the new weapons, new forces, and new capabilities being
evolved by the Soviet Union.”
Thus, whatever new threats are involved,
whether it be the awesome particle beam weapon warned about by
General Keegan or the Soviet underwater missiles I’ve been warning
about for nearly a year, Pentagon disclaimers dare not be accepted
at face value today without challenge. Those who accept these
denials are playing straight into the hands of our nation’s
deadliest enemies. Meanwhile the build-up toward the start of
Nuclear War One is gaining momentum. Two months ago Nelson
Rockefeller visited Israel to help speed up the preparations for a
Middle East war. By mid April, Israeli troops had begun massive
maneuvers in the Sinai with live ammunition, Reserves had been
called up, and Egyptian maneuvers were soon underway as well in the
western Sinai. These maneuvers, headline news in Europe and Britain,
have gone unmentioned in the United States except for the crash in
the Sinai of a huge helicopter killing 56 Israeli soldiers. Then
just a few days ago the extremists came to power by way of the
recent Israeli elections. The Middle East is now a powder keg as a
result, and the Carter administration is rapidly disengaging and
disassociating itself from Israel. So, when the nuclear strike from
the Sinai against Arab oil wells takes place, it will not be
recognized by the world or by most Americans for what it really is.
Perhaps General Keegan was also right about one other thing he said
in his speech: “We have reached a point in America where I believe
we are almost incapable, culturally, of being warned.” If so, my
friends, it is we, the United States of America, who will have been
weighed in the balances and found wanting, like ancient Babylon.
Topic #3 - When the sun came up on southeastern Idaho one day almost
a year ago, it looked like the start of just another beautiful late
spring day. It was Saturday, and two fishermen were looking forward
to a relaxing day in the shadow of the new Teton Dam. The Dam, over
300 feet high, had been completed the previous fall except for a few
finishing touches that remained, and had been gradually filling up
with water during the winter.
Now, due to the run-off of melting snow in the mountains, it was
almost full. Further down stream from the dam, tens of thousands of
people were going about their business. Some puttered around their
houses doing weekend chores, while others were at work at businesses
or on farms; but for the construction crew who arrived for work on
the Teton Dam site that morning of June 5, 1976, it was a different
story. At about 7:30 A.M. it was discovered that a sizeable leak had
sprung, not through the dam itself but through the section of
mountain on one side where the dam was anchored. This was reported
immediately to the proper authorities, who directed that steps be
taken immediately to start lowering the water level behind the Dam.
Why the leak had appeared so suddenly was a puzzle, since inspection
of the Dam by personnel around nine o’clock the previous evening had
turned up nothing wrong.
But there was no time to solve this
puzzle, because soon a second leak developed. Like the first, this
second leak also appeared to break through the anchoring mountain
side rather than the Dam itself. Now the situation began to
deteriorate at an alarming rate. Soon a leak found its way through
the earthen dam itself, and a growing torrent of water gushed from
it. Two bulldozers raced to that location to try to stop the flow by
moving more earth into position, but the leak grew so fast that the
bulldozers were lost, the operators leaping and scrambling to safety
barely in time to save themselves. Like a nightmare come true, the
Teton Dam crumbled, collapsed, and released tons of water into the
valley below. The day endedabruptly in tragedy for the two
fishermen, and others who lost their lives as well. For two days,
flood waters from that ruined dam continued to spread, ultimately
covering an area of 300 square miles including several towns and
50,000 acres of farm land. One of the major purposes of the Teton
Dam, like many others around our country, had been flood control.
Now the man-made flood unleashed by the collapsed dam had caused
damage estimated to be in the range of $350- to $500,000,000 in
addition to the loss of life. The bursting of the Teton Dam provided
America with a preview, on a very small scale, of what the Soviet
Union plans to do to our entire country.
Last month in Audioletter No. 23 I reported hard intelligence I had
received to the effect that 21 major lakes and dams in 10 western
states have hydrogen Soviet bombs planted in them. But the
information I gave you then, my friends, was only the beginning.
Since recording Audioletter No. 23, I have been under an avalanche
of ongoing intelligence reports concerning the ongoing Soviet
program of planting nuclear weapons in our inland lakes and
reservoirs. I can now reveal that this Soviet program began at a
relatively slow, careful pace as much as 18 months ago. For example,
a Soviet nuclear device was planted over a year ago at a dam known
as the Dalles on the Columbia River east of Portland, Oregon, and it
is still there now. The Teton Dam disaster appeared to be just a
great big accident, but it brought to everyone’s attention the fact
that dams can be made to collapse under certain conditions and that
the consequences are devastating. Meanwhile the border of Idaho with
Canada has become an important entry point for Soviet agents who are
bringing nuclear bombs into this country.
On Monday May 16, I received an alert
from my intelligence sources that Soviet agents were at that time in
the process of transporting nuclear weapons into the northern United
States by truck through several entry portals along the Canadian
border. The greatest focus of that activity was at the Idaho entry
points of Porthill and Eastport. For the next several days I was in
frequent contact with my intelligence contacts in Canada who were
taking very definite action to find and stop these Soviet intruders;
but here in the United States our attention is being focused on our
border with Mexico by the manufactured distraction of illegal
immigrants. At the same time, we are undergoing a wholesale invasion
along our border with Canada by the Soviet Union and not one thing
is being done about it by the United States. By late that first day,
May 16, at least 16 Soviet vehicles carrying nuclear weapons were
known to have crossed into the United States from Canada through
entry portals into Idaho and Montana; meanwhile 7 more were on
Canadian Highway 3 from Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, heading
toward Porthill and Eastport, Idaho, to enter the United States. By
that time the origination point in the Vancouver area had been
narrowed down to a barge in Horseshoe Bay.
The Canadians took care of the situation
on their side of the border by stopping and inspecting trucks in the
appropriate area, and by early May 18 all seven trucks driven by
Soviet agents had been stopped and rounded up just short of the
border. At that point, however, their next step was to wait for
further instructions from Ottawa, and I have not yet been informed
as to what further action was taken. Meanwhile the only public hint
of what was going on was contained in a short item printed in
Vancouver newspapers on May 19. It stated that trucks were being
stopped and searched along Route 3, but did not give the reason. For
my Canadian friends, now you know! But it was a different and sad
story here in the United States.
The Federal government is taking no action whatsoever, proving that
there is a continuing collusion between the Rockefeller
empire and the Soviet empire. At the State level, one would hope
that the chances of obtaining action would be a little better,
but so far that has not been the case. Concerned citizens who have
tried to bring my warnings to the attention of their
Governors and other high State officials have encountered basically
two reactions—one is that “This is something for the Federal
government, so we’ll refer it to them”; and of course there it ends.
The other main response is to the effect:
“Naturally even if we did find a
bomb in the lake next to the dam, we would not make it
public—after all, we don’t want to excite the people.”
But, my friends, that is like an air
raid warden refusing to turn on the siren during an attack because
it might frighten people. At the local level though, one would hope
that some action could still be expected, but No; during the period
of May 16 I tried in every possible way to get local and state
police in northern Idaho to simply check out some very specific
reports I had been given, but to no avail. Several Soviet trucks
were known to be heading southward in northern Idaho toward the town
of Sandpoint, and I was informed of the approximate positions where
it should have been possible to intercept them on the highway; but
when I relayed these reports to State and local police in the area,
both directly and through a brave local citizen in that area, it
turned out to be impossible to persuade them to take action. As one
police sergeant told me,
“We’re wondering why the Federal
government hasn’t stepped in on this.”
And since they had not, even after being
notified, the assumption was that there must not be anything to it,
therefore it was not even going to be investigated. And so there, my
friends, is a part of the handwriting on the wall for America.
Most all Americans have been tricked into accepting the idea that
only the Federal government counts or is able to do anything, even
though this idea is totally alien to our Republic as originally
founded. All the Federal government has to do is not act or to
remain silent about a matter, such as Soviet missiles in our waters,
and people conveniently leap to the conclusion that there must not
be any missiles. As General Keegan says, we’re becoming incapable of
being warned; and, my friends, if we don’t snap out of it, we will
suffer horribly. The fact that something was afoot in the area of
our nation’s water supplies should have been realized four years ago
when Nelson Rockefeller started his “National Commission on Water
Quality.” This he started at the same time as his much better known
“Commission on Critical Choices for Americans.” And just as the
Commission on Critical Choices was absorbed into the Federal
government in everything but name, the same was done with
Rockefeller’s Commission on Water Quality.
But even if it was clear that water was
to become a political tool in some way, I doubt that anyone in his
worst nightmares imagined what was actually afoot. Over the past
several years, Federal and State water quality control boards have
built up a comprehensive and up-to-date picture of our nation’s
water resources and requirements—and all this data has been turned
over to the Soviet Union! So now, the Soviets know exactly where and
how to strike at us through our Achilles’ heel of water, just as the
Medes and Persians were able to calculate how to attack ancient
Babylon through its water source.
In the alliance between the Rockefeller and the Soviet Union
empires, the Rockefeller brothers still want to rule the American
continent under complete dictatorship; and the Soviets still want
America to become their complete satellite—a nation of slaves.
But the Rockefellers realized long ago that this country could not
be brought under the total control they desire without the
benefit of crushing disasters to force us into that mold. And the
Soviets for their part realize that to extract the benefit from
America that they seek, it is not enough simply to conquer us in
war. Afterward there must be a core of turncoat managers,
quislings, to run America for them. Soon, the Rockefellers expect to
obtain the “Declaration of National Emergency” that
they want in response to events which can be triggered by the
Soviets. The Declaration of National Emergency, they believe, will
make their dictatorship all but complete. At the present time the
Soviet Union has at least 158 underwater missiles in our territorial
waters along our coastlines. In addition, the Great Lakes now
bristle with smaller, single warhead Soviet underwater missiles—a
total of 53 as of my latest information. The fact that the Soviet
Union has been able to invade the Great Lakes and place missiles
there is shocking; and it is even more shocking to know that Soviet
agents are fanning out all over the United States, unhampered, to
sow seeds of nuclear disaster throughout our land. It’s hard for
most people to imagine how such things are possible; but as I know
from my own sources, they are being facilitated from within our
country. For example, one of the key steps which has been taken by
the Carter administration to permit these things recently was
publicly confirmed by former Congressman John Rarick of Louisiana.
Congressman Rarick publishes a very informative monthly newsletter
entitled “You’ve a Right to Know”, about which you might write to
him at: Drawer E, Saint Francisville, La. 70775.
Quoting from his March 1977 issue, “The
Soviets are hauling United States cargo in intra-coastal shipping
illegally against the provisions of the Jones Act. Russian vessels
can be seen in the river loading from barges, and also unloading on
two barges, as if they constitute an integral arm of the United
States Maritime Service. Barges loaded by Soviets have been followed
up the river through inland waterways and small canals to where
their cargoes have even reached the Chicago market.” Congressman
Rarick further reports that the Soviets are able to get away with
this because Secretary of the Treasury Blumenthal waived the
provisions of the Jones Act as applied to Soviet vessels. Thanks to
such generous help from within the United States has been thrown
wide open to offensive Soviet actions. As a result the planting of
nuclear devices in our inland waters—rivers as well as lakes and
reservoirs—is mushrooming at a tremendous pace. To begin with,
additional bombs have been planted in some of the huge dammed-up
lakes that I named last month. For example, Hoover Dam had one bomb
when I recorded Audioletter No. 23, but now it has 3 - one next to
each end of the Dam itself, the third upstream some distance from
the Dam. Another example is Oroville Reservoir in California. Last
month it had one bomb, now it has 4.
But more serious than this overkill of a
few dams is the vast number of targets throughout America where
Soviet bombs have been and are being planted. City water reservoirs
of any significance throughout America are targeted. Many already
contain bombs, while others are scheduled to receive bombs from the
many trucks fanning out across America with Soviet agents at the
wheel. Flood control, irrigation, and hydroelectric dams of all
kinds are targets as well; and major rivers are also being seeded
with bombs at strategic points. To indicate the magnitude of the
Soviet attack plan, I will report the current status of just one
state—Texas, which is a major target. As of my latest intelligence,
over 100 bombs have already been planted in Texas; and I have been
provided so far with a partial list that specifies 33 of the lakes
involved. These are: Toledo Bend Reservoir, Sam Rayburn Reservoir,
Steinhillyers Reservoir, Lake Vernon, two lakes northeast of Houston
which provide water for the city, Conroe Lake, Somerville Reservoir,
Lake Waco, Lake Whitney, Malakoff Lake, Frankston Lake, Lake
Livingston, Millwood Reservoir, Lake Texarkana, Lake O’ the Pines,
Cedar Lake, Lake Tawakoni, four water reservoirs for Dallas and Fort
Worth, Lake Texoma, Arbuckle Reservoir, Lake Bridgeport, Hubbard
Creek Reservoir, Lake Kemp, Lake Arrowhead, O’Folla Reservoir, San
Angelo Reservoir, Twin Buttes Reservoir, Lake Thomas, and White
River Reservoir.
A number of rivers around the country are also known to be involved
already. These include the Mississippi, the Missouri, the Illinois,
the Ohio, the Columbia, the Potomac, and the Susquehanna. In the
Mississippi alone there are already 31 bombs located near dams, and
locks, and other strategic points. The farthest to the north is a
bomb about 5 miles downstream of Little Falls, Minnesota. From
there, they have all been planted all the way down to New Orleans of
Louisiana, where 2 bombs are in the river. There are also two other
bombs near New Orleans at the east end of Lake Pontchartrain.
My friends, the Soviet Union is striving to be in a position to
suddenly, decisively rob America of our water resources. While we
are distracted with arguments over weapons delivery systems, such as
bombers and missiles, the Soviet Union is striving for the
reliability of weapons that are already on site at the target. When
war comes, the Soviet Union plans to be able to just push a button,
detonate nuclear weapons all over America, devastate our country
with floods and the pestilence that they bring, and still have all
their missiles and bombers still in reserve. But before war comes,
the Rockefeller/ Soviet alliance plan to lay the groundwork for a
Declaration of National Emergency in the United States.
One option still available to them is war in the Middle East causing
a cutoff of Arab OPEC oil supplies. But a horrendous new capability
is now in place as an alternate means for creating our national
emergency; and, my friends, there are ominous signs that this
capability is going to be used, very soon. Lurking deep in the
waters around the Philippine Islands there are now 7
fission-fusion-fission bombs planted there by the Soviet Union. Such
a bomb is essentially a hydrogen bomb with a jacket of uranium 238.
When it’s set off, the nuclear reaction converts much of the jacket
material to plutonium 239, which in turn explodes as well. The
Soviet Union is the only nation that has ever set off such a
bomb - 16 years ago on October 30, 1961. In doing so, they set an
ugly record that still stands—the biggest nuclear weapon ever fired
in the atmosphere. Its yield was something over 50 megatons—that is
50 million tons of TNT, 2500 times as large as the atomic bomb
dropped on Hiroshima. Theoretically, there’s no limit to the yield
of such a bomb, but for 16 years it has been thought of in the West
as unusable because it produces such vast quantities of fall-out
that it would endanger the country that used it. But the Soviet
Union has found a way to use it—deep under the ocean for geophysical
warfare in an environment where the radio-active products are
relatively confined, producing little fall-out. The Philippines sit
like a keystone among a long arch of sub-sea trenches and faults
that comprise the most earthquake-prone areas on earth.
Starting just north of New Zealand, a band of geological instability
runs northwestward toward the Philippines, then
northeastward past Japan to the Kamchatka Peninsula, eastward along
the Aleutians to Alaska, and then southward along the west coast of
the United States, Mexico, Central America, and onwardall the way to
Chile. This long, irregular zone around the Pacific rim is often
called the “Ring of Fire.” The 7 Soviet bombs planted in Philippine
waters are there for the purpose of triggering major earthquakes,
which, thanks to the peculiar convergence of faults and trenches in
that area, are intended to work their way by chain reaction all
around the Pacific rim, devastating Washington State, Oregon, and
California in the process. The 7 bombs in the Philippines are in the
so-called gigaton range—that is, each one is equivalent to a billion
tons of TNT - 50,000 times more powerful than the Hiroshima bomb and
therefore big enough to trigger massive earthquakes.
And the Soviets believe they can safely
use such warfare, treaties or no treaties, because most of the
Soviet Union has no history of earthquakes. The Soviet gigaton bombs
in the Philippines are located at navigational coordinates which I
will now reveal. No. 1 is at 17-23-23 north, 117-7-23 east; No. 2 is
at 14-48-48 north, 119-2-18 east; No. 3 is at 14-0-40 north,
118-23-53 east; No. 4 is at 13-0-0 north, 117-42-8 east; No. 5 is at
12-0-54 north, 126-4-55 east; No. 6 is at 13-50-36 north, 125-21-45
east; No. 7 is at 19-48-3 north, 123-51-57 east. But to make sure
that our west coast is devastated by the effects of a seeming
natural disaster erupting in the Philippines, a series of 7
conventional but large hydrogen bombs have been planted off our west
coast by the Soviet Union. These can be set off in conjunction with
those in the Philippines, and at the right moment to produce tidal
waves which would sweep in from the Pacific with devastating effect
along our west coast. Bomb No. 1 west of Seattle is at 48-0-0 north,
127-50-0 west; No. 2 west of Eugene, Oregon is at 43-29-18 north,
127-55-5 west; No. 3 west of San Francisco is at 37-8-45 north,
125-42-30 west; No. 4 west of Monterey is at 36-31-0 north,
125-26-30 west; No. 5, also west of Monterey, is at 36-26-30 north,
124-56-0 west; No. 6 west of Los Angeles is at 33-25-15 north,
122-23-50 west; and No. 7 southwest of San Diego is at 31-45-35
north, 120-36-0 west.
In my Audioletter No. 20 for January
1977, I referred to a warning document issued in December 1975 by
Mr. Tony Hodges of Hawaii. In that document Mr. Hodges presented
evidence of the feasibility of underwater missiles. He also warned
of the dangers of bombs on or in the seabed designed to generate
earthquakes or tidal waves. Unfortunately, it turns out that Mr.
Hodges warnings were all valid.
The dictatorship and war plans are being speeded up now; the world
will be stunned by what will look like a massive, natural disaster
in the Philippines that also spreads around the Ring of Fire to
decimate our west coast. And when it happens, Jimmy Carter will have
the excuse David Rockefeller wants him to have to declare a National
Emergency and in effect suspend the United States Constitution. The
President’s dictatorial emergency powers spelled out in Executive
Orders 11490 and 11921 will be activated, and the complete
bureaucracy of dictatorship set in motion under circumstances
designed to stifle all dissent; and the elaborate prescriptions for
complete governmental control of all of our water resources spelled
out in Executive Order 11921 will be activated under conditions
which enable this to be sold to the people as necessary for our best
interest. Soon thereafter, with the Rockefeller dictatorship in
place, Nuclear War One itself is planned to come. Dams and
reservoirs all over America are to be destroyed at one blow by the
Soviet Union; and the quislings from the Trilateral Commission, who
now control the Federal government, will use their control over what
little remains of our water supplies to make their domination of us
total. The saddest thing about all of this is that only when it
happens will people believe. By total exposure there is a chance to
prevent the West Coast disaster; but without exposure, there is no
chance whatsoever.
My friends, it’s only by the grace and power of our Lord Jesus
Christ that I’ve received the information I revealed over the recent
past; and it’s my solemn duty to pass on this information to
you—it’s not meant for me alone. And in the same way, it’s not meant
for you alone—it needs to be known by every one. And so, my friends,
this completes two years of my monthly Audioletters. I want to thank
you for all your words of encouragement, your support, and
especially your prayers.
Again, thank you; and may God bless each
and every one of you.
|