Audio Letter #28
Hello, my friends, this is Dr. Beter. Today is November 21, 1977,
and this is my Audioletter No. 28.
In the closing moments of Audioletter No. 22 for March 1977, I
warned you that: “The elaborate war plan which I revealed in monthly
Audioletter No. 6 for November 1975 is being revised and updated for
application in the present circumstances. Certain of my sources have
expressed great concern to me recently that a provocation for war in
the Middle East is now being established that will be unlike
anything we have ever seen before.” And then I added:
“To achieve that purpose, plans are
being seriously considered which, if carried out, could
instantly throw all three major religions of the western world
into turmoil in the course of igniting a Middle East conflict.
My hope is that by warning you of the existence of such plans, I
am making them too dangerous for the conspirators to carry out;
but in case they are carried out, I hope that you will now be
able to recognize it immediately when it happens.”
(End of quotation from Audioletter
No. 22)
As I speak these words today, eight
months later, the eyes of the world are suddenly focused on the
Middle East as never before. The stalemate of Middle East peace
negotiations has, in a week’s time, been shattered in a spectacular
way, and something unheard of is unfolding before our very eyes.
After 29 years of hostility and wars, President Anwar Sadat of Egypt
left Jerusalem today where he talked of peace face to face with
Israeli leaders and to address the Israeli parliament. All other
diplomatic efforts to bring peace in that region have been thrown
aside by Sadat’s unexpected mission to Israel. But already Sadat
finds himself almost totally isolated in the Arab world, supported
only by Tunisia and Morocco.
All of this, my friends, is only the beginning. The plan to plunge
the Middle East into war as the first step toward Nuclear War One,
has now been set in motion; and Sadat’s trip is intended to be
nothing more than a major step towards fulfillment of this plan.
It is now almost two months since America’s disastrous defeat in the
still secret Battle of the Harvest Moon—history’s first Space
Battle, on September 27, 1977. Since that time, our rulers have been
trying for the very first time in their lives to deal with a
situation in which they no longer have a hidden whip with which to
make the Soviet Union cooperate with them. But they are not doing
the one thing which would have at least a chance at preventing
nuclear war, and that is total official world-wide exposure of the
present Soviet war threat as it affects not only the United States
but also many other countries. Instead, they are falling back on the
techniques of maneuver, deception, and doublecross. Now that they
have lost control of the Soviet Union, the Rockefeller brothers are
discovering that their survival is tied to our national survival
after all; but instead of letting us in on what we now face, their
controlled CIA and other agents are trying to find some way to
maneuver out of the Russian bear trap—stalling for time while still
keeping us in the dark.
My three topics for today are:
-
Topic #1 - A HOUSE
DIVIDED AGAINST ITSELF OVER SALT
-
Topic #2 - THE EXCHANGE
OF SOVIET AND AMERICAN THREATS
-
Topic #3 - THE SADAT
TRIP TO ISRAEL AND NUCLEAR WAR ONE
Topic #1
- In 1961 two major programs were
started in parallel by the controlled government of the United
States. One was America’s crash program to go to the moon, announced
by President Kennedy in May of that year; the other was the program
to disarm America in stages, signaled by the creation of the “Arms
Control and Disarmament Agency” in September of that same
year - 1961. Neither the moon project nor the disarmament program was
what it seemed on the surface; and while they were made to seem
unrelated, they were actually two arms of a single military strategy
for dictatorship over the United States and finally over the world.
It is this diabolical strategy that has finally jumped the tracks,
leaving not only the United States but also our hidden rulers in a
desperate situation.
The strategy which began to be implemented in 1961 was a very
complex one, but its underlying concept is as simple as it is
astonishing. Basically our rulers were in effect going underground
with all of the most important new military developments while
gradually stripping us of our existing better-known military
capabilities. In the process, our Constitutional military
services—that is, those which are required by law to serve you and
me—have been gradually downgraded, weakened, and demoralized. But
behind the scenes, unhampered by legal or moral constraints, ever
more advanced weapons have been created for the exclusive benefit of
our secret rulers without any hint of their existence to the public
or to Congress. Thus, as I first revealed ten months ago in
Audioletter No. 20, the controlled CIA has secretly become the most
powerful military agency in the United States in total violation of
its charter and the United States Constitution. The centerpiece of
this 16-year-old program of developing totally secret weapons, was
our Moon Program.
In Audioletter No. 26 two months ago I
told you the full story about our Moon project, which from the start
had a military purpose and which ended in disaster just two months
ago on September 27, 1977. But there were many other aspects to this
program as well. For example, in recent years the American public
have become accustomed to publicly-acknowledged weapons programs
costing vast sums that seem out of all proportion to what the
weapons are worth. These cost overruns, my friends, are due not only
to mismanagement and waste; they are also a means of financing
secret projects by burying their costs in the bloated budgets of
publicly-known programs. As for the weapons themselves that we are
publicly told about today, it’s almost as if innovation and progress
had suddenly stopped in 1961 aside from marginal improvements here
and there. When we hear about nuclear ballistic missile submarines,
for example, how many people stop to think how long it has been
since they made their appearance?
The first atomic submarine, the USS NAUTILUS, was launched nearly a
quarter century ago, in 1954, and was a spectacular advance over the
diesel and battery-powered boats of World War II. Only 5 years
later, but now nearly 20 years ago, came the next spectacular
advance—the ballistic missile submarine, beginning with the GEORGE
WASHINGTON in 1959. At about the same time, the public was given a
hint of ‘things to come’ when films were made public showing the
periscope of a research submarine outrunning a speeding Coast Guard
Cutter with ease. But starting in 1961, public attention to the
possibilities of major future advances began to be avoided. In the
same way, the 16 years from 1945 to 1961, saw a spectacular steady
advancement in military aircraft capabilities. In 1945 our
first-line fighters and bombers were propeller-driven, jets were
still largely experimental, and most people took it for granted that
there was a sound barrier that could not be cracked; but a mere 10
years later, jet bombers and fighters ruled the air and supersonic
travel was a reality. In 1956, the F-104 was introduced with a top
speed of 2-1/2 times the speed of sound, roughly the same as the
newest American fighters today. We hear all about the wonderful
Cruise Missile, but we are not supposed to remember another kind of
cruise missile of a decade ago, canceled by then Secretary of
Defense, Robert McNamara. Called PLUTO, it was to be
nuclear-powered, able to circle the earth several times over, and
strike an enemy from any direction at extremely low altitudes and
supersonic speeds. And while we content ourselves with fatiguing
20-year-old slow B-52s, we’re not supposed to remember that in the
early 60’s the B-70 was already flying at three times the speed of
sound.
By now most Americans have all but forgotten about these fast-moving
developments of yesteryear. Many of these lie far beyond any
technology which is publicly admitted to be in use today, and they
provide a dim hint of the secret weapons developments that have
actually taken place without our consent—and not for our good. Only
the most spectacular, huge program of them all, the Moon Program,
was made public simply because there was no other way to do it. As I
explained in Audioletter No. 26, secrecy was maintained by not
letting us in on the purpose of the Moon Program, bathing the
program otherwise in great publicity. Originally the plan was for
the United States to be decimated in Nuclear War One as part of a
larger plot for world control; but now, the secret American Moon
Base in Copernicus Crater has been put out of action—the Russians
are now on the moon, furiously at work. The Soviet Union is the
exclusive possessor of the awesome new Particle Beam Weapon, which
is being used to blow our Spy Satellites out of the sky; and all but
two of the secret CIA undersea super-missiles which were planted by
Glomar Explorer and other means, have sprung leaks and become
useless. For the very first time the Soviet Union is in the driver’s
seat militarily, and America’s secret rulers are in disarray over
what to do.
Last month I exposed the events leading to the Carter
administration’s surrender to the Soviet Union on October 14, 1977,
in the face of a deadly Soviet submarine threat against our country.
The terms of the surrender require quick
acceptance by us of a SALT II agreement which will begin the final,
total disarming of America; but once we are disarmed, the intention
of the Kremlin’s leaders is to ultimately strike the United States
in a devastating military blow anyway. The more fully we can be
disarmed beforehand, the less suffering will have to be endured by
Russia as the price of destroying America for all time. To grasp the
Soviet thinking about all of this, one must begin by understanding
one key but little known fact—the Kremlin is no longer ruled today
by the Bolshevik Communists whose November 1917 Revolution was
celebrated this month. The Soviet inner circle today are Communists
but of a very different breed from Lenin and his Bolsheviks. They
were atheistic Communists, whereas the ruling group today would be
better described as self-styled Spiritual Communists; and while the
Bolsheviks drew upon international support and were dominated by
international interests, the Kremlin rulers of today are strongly
nationalistic. They are determined that Soviet Russia, not just
international Communism for its own sake, shall rule the world. When
Alexander Solzhenitsyn left the Soviet Union in exile, he first had
to sign a document in which he indicated that he still believed in
Communism, meaning Spiritual Communism, in which the Communist
government would be under the control of the church. When he sent
this letter to the Kremlin, it was accepted and he was allowed to
go. Solzhenitsyn today champions the reformation of the
Soviet-Marxist government, but this reformation is not intended to
break down the present Soviet power structure. Indeed, Solzhenitsyn
has said while predicting the imminent fall of the West, that he
expects to be back in Russia within just a few years’ time.
The take-over of the new ruling faction from the Bolsheviks began
with the death of Joseph Stalin on March 5, 1953. This faction of
Marxists, working within Russia had allied themselves with the
Bolsheviks in 1917, thereby guaranteeing the success of the
Bolshevik Revolution. But even though the Bolsheviks and the
self-styled Spiritual Communists agreed on the concept of Communism
as the proper form of government, the Spiritual Communists retained
their separate identity and worked toward the day when they would be
able to seize total control for themselves. That day arrived when
Stalin died—March 5, 1953. The following day Georgi Malenkov, the
brother-in-law of Nikita Khrushchev, became Soviet Premier. When he
was succeeded two years later on February 8, 1955, by Nikolai
Bulganin, the transition was peaceful, without bloodshed. A year
later, Khrushchev as First Secretary of the Communist Party,
launched his famous campaign to de-Stalinize Russia. Khrushchev
himself had been an accessory to brutal purges on behalf of the
Stalinist state, but when he replaced Bulganin as Premier on March
27, 1958, the transition once again was peaceful.
Bulganin had resigned. On October 15,
1964, Leonid Brezhnev replaced Khrushchev as First Secretary of the
Communist Party, and Aleksei Kosygin became Premier. Khrushchev was
in deep trouble because of his failure in the Cuban Missile Crisis
and some other sharp reversals of his policies. But even Khrushchev
was not liquidated in the old Bolshevik tradition of bloody power
struggles. Instead, he was simply pushed aside and allowed to live
in quiet retirement, writing his memoirs and receiving his pension.
Power struggles in the Kremlin for the past quarter century have
been devoid of the bloody infighting that was typical of the
Bolsheviks. The new breed in the Kremlin today can be as brutal as
anyone with their enemies or with those who rise up against their
rule, as proven in Hungary in 1956 and in Czechoslovakia in 1968;
but among themselves there is a degree of tight-knit mutual respect
that would have been inconceivable in the old Bolshevik days. They
are united in their religion of Spiritual Communism, and in their
hatred for the international forces with whom they have been forced
to cooperate for so long.
My friends, the international forces which are controlled today by
the four Rockefeller brothers is motivated primarily by
greed and lust for power, but the self-styled Spiritual Communists
who control the Kremlin today look upon their goal of Communizing
the world from an added perspective. While they strive for power and
total control, they are motivated by the
zeal of saving their own souls. Like the Christian Crusaders of
centuries ago, who sought to evangelize the world at the point of a
sword, the Kremlin of today intends to impose its system on all of
us with the dedication, steadfastness, and determination of the true
believer. In their view, any amount of suffering and brutality is
justified so long as it leads toward the final goal of World
Spiritual Communism under Soviet domination. This change in the
make-up of the Kremlin has never been fully understood or
appreciated by those who dominate our government behind the scenes.
And confronted as they are by the unified determined stance of the
Kremlin, they are responding with indecision, divisions within their
own ranks, and desperate maneuverings.
The real divisions that now exist within
the ruling circles of this country are being compounded by some of
these maneuvers which are intended to stall for time without
arousing Soviet suspicions. As a result, as the United States faces
the worst threat in its history, we see in our own country a house
divided against itself, some saying SALT II is wonderful, others
saying it is dangerous, still others daring to tell the public a few
words about the agreement that will seal our fate, yet others
declaring in total ignorance that SALT II is a good thing and that
its critics should be investigated. Some of the controversy is real,
some manipulated, but most of the spokesmen on the political scene,
regardless of their SALT viewpoint, are tied to the one Rockefeller
international party that rules not only North America but Europe and
Japan as well—the TRILATERAL COMMISSION, headed by one David
Rockefeller. Last month I described the growing euphoria over the
certainty of a SALT II agreement, but even as I recorded that tape,
the multi-prong controversy over SALT II was increasing.
On November 1st, news reports suddenly
said snags had cropped up in the SALT II talks. A former arms
control negotiator was quoted as saying, “I believe we are locked
into inferiority and I don’t know how to get out of it.” The next
day, November 2, Leonid Brezhnev proposed in a speech that all
nuclear explosions be banned, including peaceful and underwater
explosions. His mention of underwater explosions was actually a
veiled threat, urging the Carter administration to ‘get on with it’
in selling the SALT II surrender to Congress and the American
public. Secretary of State Cyrus Vance immediately hailed Brezhnev’s
statement as a great thing, adding: “There has been improvement in
the relationship between ourselves and the Soviet Union in the last
several weeks.” Two days later on November 4, Vance was totally
unprepared to back up his answers about SALT details in a
closed-door Senate hearing.
The reason is that the administration is
preparing to go around Congress to conclude a SALT II agreement with
Moscow by EXECUTIVE ORDER. The SALT II contract will actually
contain United States capitulation terms; meanwhile Congress is
being used as much as possible to raise a smoke screen of
controversy to provide an excuse to buy time. Three days later, on
November 7, a fresh campaign began to reassure the Kremlin that the
agreement of October 14 to accept the disarming of America by SALT
II is still on track. Political attacks were unleashed against SALT
critics for allegedly leaking information to the public that might
jeopardize SALT II. Meanwhile the 60th anniversary of the Bolshevik
Revolution was being celebrated in Moscow with the biggest military
parade through Red Square ever. And while Soviet President Brezhnev
talked detente, his Defense Minister delivered a speech so
belligerent that it left many western observers shaken and
bewildered.
To continue soothing the Russian Bear, Jimmy Carter said on November
11, “My prediction is we will have a SALT agreement. There will be a
SALT II. We will immediately continue with a SALT III.” In this he
was parroting the Kremlin line, echoing Soviet Ambassador Dobrynin
who predicted that same day that there will be a SALT agreement
before the end of the year. But the divided house of America’s
government continued to careen along, out of control. Only two days
after these reassuring public words to the Kremlin by Carter,
officials of his own administration said that it would probably be
another three to six months before SALT II became a reality. The
same day, Senate Minority Leader Howard Baker told the press that
SALT II “is in trouble now.”
Soviet exasperation has been building rapidly at the on-again,
off-again political game-playing over SALT II. Only last month the
Soviet Union backed off from a nuclear strike against the United
States in response to a capitulation by the Carter administration on
October 14. The Russians can recognize stalling when they see it,
and they wasted no time in flexing their own military muscle this
month to make the Carter administration knuckle under again.
Topic #2 - In Audioletter No. 24 for May 1977, six months ago, I
revealed the beginning of a Soviet program of preparing for
geophysical warfare with huge nuclear bombs planted at strategic
locations under the sea to produce artificial earthquakes and tidal
waves. In Audioletter No. 25 for August I also gave the coordinates
of 10 new bombs, cobalt bombs, that had been planted in addition to
the 7 super-bombs lurking around the Philippine Islands. Since that
time, dozens of additional undersea bombs have been planted
worldwide and several have been set off. The strength of the quake
that is triggered by setting off such a bomb can vary somewhat,
depending on the stresses that already exist in the earth’s crust at
that location and other factors. But in many cases the shock
strength turns out to be about 6.5 on the Richter Scale, strong
enough to do major damage if it were on land.
As a result, there have been a
considerable number of undersea quakes of strength around 6.5
reported lately, yet the news media never comment on how strange it
is that so many quakes are happening with virtually the same
strength. The most remarkable case of media silence about the
similar strength of so many quakes, took place on September 4, 1977,
2-1/2 months ago. On that day the Soviet Union set off four of their
undersea bombs in the Pacific—one at the north end of the New
Hebrides trench northeast of Australia, and three in the Aleutian
trench thousands of miles to the north. The three main quakes that
were produced in the Aleutians had Richter Scale readings of 6.5,
6.6, and 6.5 respectively. The one in the New Hebrides was slightly
stronger with a reading of 6.8. These facts were reported in the
news, but no one ventured a word about the similar strength of all
these major quakes.
On November 2 Leonid Brezhnev mentioned in a speech his hope that
all nuclear explosions, including underwater explosions, could be
terminated. But the political stalling tactics against SALT II were
just getting underway, and two days later the Kremlin set off
another undersea bomb in the Aleutians to remind the Carter
administration of what they can do. The result was an undersea quake
near the Island of Adak and, as usual, the reported strength of the
shock was 6.5 on the Richter Scale. Two days later, impatient with
Carter administration performance in pushing through acceptance of
the SALT II proposals to disarm America, the Kremlin raised the
stakes.
Shortly after midnight Sunday November 6, 1977, Jimmy Carter’s home
state of Georgia became the target for another demonstration of what
the Kremlin plans for those who stand in their way. A button was
pushed, and a small nuclear mine that had been planted just upstream
of the Toccoa Falls Dam in northern Georgia was detonated.
Torrential rains in the area were just ending, but as usual the dam
showed no sign that anything was wrong. A year earlier the same dam
had experienced such heavy rainfall that water spilled over the top.
This had caused the creek in the valley 200 feet below to overflow
its banks, but the dam itself had suffered no damage. For forty
years the Toccoa Dam had served its purpose without incident, and a
visual inspection just three days earlier had revealed nothing
wrong; but when the Soviet mine was set off, the dam collapsed
instantly. The blast from the mine momentarily parted the waters of
Kelly Barnes Lake, throwing a wave of water downstream with the dam
and momentarily backing up the water upstream of the mine. Then the
bulk of the lake rushed out through the huge breach in the dam,
hurtled over 200-foot-high Toccoa Falls, and rushed into the valley
below. A double wave of water swept through the Bible College campus
below—a smaller initial wave, followed by the main body of water. A
three-mile long swath was devastated and 38 people died, half of
them children.
The Toccoa Dam disaster came in the wake of deepening worry over the
continued Soviet Particle Beam attacks on our spy satellites. Within
hours Jimmy Carter postponed his planned trip abroad telling us that
the reason was to push Congress toward adoption of his so-called
Energy Bill. Three days after the Toccoa disaster on November 9,
U.S. Ambassador Malcolm Toon met at his request with Soviet
President Brezhnev in the Kremlin for over an hour, delivering an
urgent letter from Carter. No details were released about the
letter, but Carter was making two basic requests:
(1) That the Soviet Union
cease and desist from destroying American surveillance
satellites, and
(2) that Brezhnev and Carter
meet at the earliest possible moment.
But Brezhnev gave Carter no
encouragement about a meeting until after a SALT II accord is
reached, and he drummed away at the urgency of finalizing the
agreement dictated by the Kremlin. In other words, the Soviets do
not intend to tolerate stalling by the Carter administration.
The same day, November 9, 1977, events
were set in motion that are intended to unleash a Middle East
War—and in its wake NUCLEAR WAR ONE. I’ll tell you more about that
in Topic #3.
On November 12, Soviet pressure on the Carter administration was
raised a notch higher. In Iri, South Korea, a railroad yard was
suddenly laid waste by a tremendous explosion. Scores were killed
outright, over a thousand people were injured, nearly 10,000 homes
and buildings were destroyed, and over 14,000 people were suddenly
homeless. That blast was heard over 10 miles away. Soviet agents had
planned for a railroad car full of dynamite to be in the blast area
to provide a cover story for public consumption. But South Korean
analysts who arrived on the scene knew right away that this was no
ordinary dynamite blast. An explosive sitting on the surface, like
the carload of dynamite, produces an extremely wide, shallow crater;
but in the Iri disaster not one but two distinct craters were
produced with an area of overlap between them.
Furthermore, each crater was extremely
deep compared to its width—one of them 49 feet deep, the other 65
feet deep; and although 30 tons of dynamite produces a very violent
blast indeed, each crater corresponds to an explosive force perhaps
100 times that powerful. According to high intelligence sources,
Soviet agents are known to have buried two (2) clean nuclear mines
in the area where the blast occurred. They were placed side by side
about 100 feet apart—to do maximum damage to the network of railroad
tracks. Each had a yield of several kilotons, a fraction of the
yield of the Hiroshima bomb; and on November 12, 1977, they were
detonated simultaneously. It was a disaster for South Korea—and
another shocking warning to the Carter administration that the
Soviet Union is not to be trifled with. And when Brezhnev speaks of
the urgency of finalizing the SALT II agreement, he means we are on
a short fuse and that he will not be patient for very long. The
Carter administration is being backed into a corner so rapidly by
the Kremlin that an abortive decision was made earlier this month to
pull out all the stops for a pre-emptive war against the Soviet
Union. This idea was to let the chips fall where they may while we
do still have some military might left; but as of two days ago,
November 19, the Soviet Union has already squelched this plan, and
the war now brewing is back on track to be, as Gromyko said to
Carter on September 27, 1977, ‘on Soviet terms.’
The letter from Carter delivered to Brezhnev on November 9
received no immediate reply. Instead, the blast in South Korea
signaled that the Kremlin was growing still more impatient for the
SALT II approval process to get off dead center, and more of our
satellites have been blasted this month by Soviet Cosmos
Interceptors wielding Particle Beams. By November 18, three days
ago, there still had been no direct answer, and on that day the
“Voice of America” was used to hurl a thinly-veiled threat at
Moscow. Every nation uses its national radio as a tool of propaganda
and electronic diplomacy, the United States included. Every message
that is broadcast by the Voice of America is heavily censored,
edited, analyzed and picked apart to make sure that every word says
what the United States government wants said. Bearing in mind that
our satellite warning systems are now being destroyed by Soviet
Killer Satellites, listen carefully to these words from the Voice of
America broadcast of November 18, 1977, and I quote:
“The White House has warned that the
deployment of these so-called Killer Satellites could increase
the chances of a first strike in space”, and “the obviously
destabilizing danger of satellite warfare is that with its
observation satellites put out of commission, a nation would
lose a major portion of its warning system and might then
consider pre-emptive war.”
In diplomatic language, these words
amounted to a very clear threat by the United States to attack the
Soviet Union if no satisfaction is received concerning our vanishing
spy satellites. On the afternoon of that same day, November 18,
Soviet Ambassador Anatoly Dobrynin delivered a message from Brezhnev
to Carter at the White House. The message made it clear that
Washington is in no position to dictate anything to the Kremlin now,
that the SALT approval process in the United States is becoming ever
more “urgent”, and that the Soviet president would regret being
forced to take any measures that might run counter to the recent
‘improvement’ in relations between the two nations.
The full impact of Brezhnev’s last comment reached the White House
at roughly that same time as the Brezhnev message itself. The NATO
underwater sonar nets around Iceland had picked up the Soviet
Atlantic submarine fleet which, as happened six weeks ago, was
headed en masse into the Atlantic at great speed. At the same time,
the huge Soviet Pacific submarine fleet was also on its way toward
the United States, and the Gulf fleet was already moving into
position to threaten us from the south. Even before the Voice of
America broadcast, the Kremlin knew that the Carter administration
response to increasing Soviet pressure over SALT could possibly be
some kind of bluff and possibly panic as well, so the Soviet navy
had been dispatched in order to ensure that nothing would get out of
hand; and when government officials here learned that the Soviet
fleet was on its way here again, they promptly wilted. Shades of
Kerensky!
As of now they are once again
concentrating on doing as they are told by the Soviet Union, and
both the Pacific and Atlantic fleets have headed back toward port;
but the Soviet Gulf Fleet has not left—it is staying on station for
the moment ready for attack at a moment’s notice from our soft
underbelly to the south. This is Moscow’s way of discouraging the
Carter administration from attempting any more bluffs or hasty
actions that might upset America’s programmed march into final
disaster.
Topic #3
- Audioletter No. 22, in which I warned
about a horrendous new plan to provoke a Middle East war, was
recorded on March 27, 1977. Exactly one week later, on April 3,
1977, President Anwar Sadat of Egypt arrived in Washington for talks
with President Carter, and the first phase of the CIA Middle East
plot got under way. Sadat had in the past been asked from time
to time by reporters whether face-to-face negotiations directly
between the Arabs and Israelis might be useful. He had always
rejected this out of hand, and when asked the same question on April
6 responded in the same way. He said that after 29 years of hatred
and 4 wars, the Arabs were not yet ready for such a drastic step.
But during his visit here, Sadat was subjected to the psychological
programming techniques which I revealed over two years ago in
Audioletter No. 5 for October 1975. These techniques can be used to
alter a person’s brain-wave pattern and inject thoughts and
tendencies that differ from their normal thinking. As I told you
then, a world leader can be programmed to change his policies—and
that is what happened to Sadat. During his visit here last April, a
single thought was planted in Sadat’s mind—namely, to go directly to
Israel to negotiate. It was a thought totally foreign to Sadat, but
ever since his visit here it has been in his mind constantly, and he
has been unable to shake it.
While Sadat was here on April 7, Prime Minister Rabin of Israel
resigned. Supposedly he was ensnared in a financial scandal, but
actually he had learned of the plot to bring on a war and he wanted
no part of it. Rabin’s departure from the scene slowed down this
plan while a new Prime Minister was elected. It was Menachem Begin.
He had to form a government and establish himself on the world
stage. But now, the fuse had been lit that is intended to make the
Middle East explode into war. On November 9, reacting to the
stimulus implanted in his mind, Sadat startled everyone by saying he
would be willing to go anywhere, even Jerusalem, to seek peace. Only
five days later, television interviews of Sadat and Begin by Walter
Cronkite of CBS and others set the stage for Sadat’s trip to Israel.
Sadat’s decision to go to Israel was so
abrupt that it produced a sharp contrast between Sadat’s actions and
those of his own Foreign Minister Fahmy. While Sadat was on
television with Walter Cronkite, Fahmy was in Tunisia at a meeting
of Arab Foreign Ministers trying to rally all the Arabs to a united
front in peace negotiations with Israel. Three days later, Sadat
announced his acceptance of the invitation he had solicited from
Israel, and Fahmy resigned. For Sadat, the earliest possible moment
for the trip was hardly soon enough because he was now under a
psychological compulsion to make the trip. Begin invited Sadat to
Israel on or after November 21, but Sadat answered that he would
arrive on the 19th, which he did. Now, in spite of the best of
intentions, Sadat has been used as a tool of the CIA to narrow the
focus of Middle East peace negotiations to the outcome of the Sadat-Begin
discussions.
It is now a much easier matter than before to torpedo peace in the
Middle East—and that is what is planned. The Sadat peace initiative
to Israel is supposed to be, unknown to Sadat himself, the first
step toward war. Meanwhile the framework for a war to accomplish the
objectives described two years ago in my Audioletter No. 6, is being
established all around us. The American team in the Sinai, put there
supposedly to act as a buffer between Israel and Egypt, is still
there, having quietly swollen to a force more than a thousand strong
armed with F-15’s and nuclear weapons. Cautious Saudi Arabia has
been drawn into making statements recently in support of the Arab
cause that will serve as a sufficient excuse for Saudi Arabia to be
included in the nuclear strike against Arab OPEC oil wells that is
planned when war comes. Meanwhile we have been seeing the cover
stories in the news about possible acquisition by Israel of large
amounts of nuclear materials from America in recent years, planting
the idea that Israel has “the bomb.”
The triggering of the Sadat trip to Israel and the extremely rapid
pace of events must be considered in light of the equally sudden
visit to Washington by the Shah of Iran on November 14.
This was the same day that Sadat and Begin committed themselves to a
face-to-face meeting during interviews on television. On the 16th
the Shah left the United States, and on that day Tehran Radio
broadcast that there is “total United States commitment to come to
Iran’s aid in the event of an emergency.” Iran is positioned on the
soft underbelly of the Soviet Union and it bristles with advanced
American weaponry. Two days later the Voice of America broadcast its
war threat against Moscow which I quoted earlier. But the chess
players in the Kremlin had already gotten the message and the Soviet
fleet was already at sea by then. As a result, any active threat
Russia may be facing from Iran on its southern flank is offset by an
active threat on our own southern flank in the form of submarines on
station in the Gulf of Mexico. Thus, while the remnants of the
United States government are maneuvering to try to salvage some
benefit for themselves from the coming war, the Kremlin is matching
every move with counteractive measures designed to maintain their
commanding military position, and every day that is wasted by not
revealing the truth of these events, works to the benefit of the
Soviet Union in that the Soviet Union is consolidating its newly
dominant position still further.
When I recorded Audioletter No. 27 last month, Soviet cosmonauts had
established an initial base of operations in Jules Verne Crater on
the back side of the moon. However, it was expected at that time
that after preliminary preparations they would very shortly be
moving both equipment and personnel to the near side, setting up an
operational Particle Beam weapon almost immediately when they did
so. On October 30, the day after I recorded my tape, I was informed
that an initial move to the front side had taken place to Gibbs
Crater, which is on the southeast rim of the near side of the moon.
Since that time, Soviet activity on the moon has been steadily
increasing. As of now there are seven (7) Soviet Particle Beam
weapons dotted around the near side of the moon and, surprisingly,
there are three separate back-up bases on the far side, including
the original site at Jules Verne Crater.
As yet, all of these installations are
very thinly manned and they are far from being self-sufficient at
this point—in order to keep functioning they must periodically
receive supplies from earth. But the Particle Beam weapons are
operational, and if the normal Soviet pattern is followed, we can
expect a test of a moon-based Particle Beam weapon against some
earth target in the very near future—and if this is done, it will
probably take place under circumstances where its effects can be
explained away as having some other cause. Possibly for the sake of
secrecy, a target area within the Soviet Union far from populated
areas, will be chosen for such testing; but it’s also possible that
like the first operational test of an orbital Particle Beam weapon,
the first test of a Lunar Particle Beam weapon might be against some
target that the Soviet Union wishes to destroy.
In any case, here are the lunar navigational coordinates of the
seven Particle Beam weapons currently on the near side of the moon:
-
No. 1 east of the Sea of Cold at 55
degrees 54 minutes north, 51 degrees zero minutes east;
-
No. 2 west of the Sea of Crises at
16 - 33 North, 48 - 51 east;
-
No. 3 southeast of the Sea of
Fertility at 31 - 53 south, 73 - 9 east;
-
No. 4 near the south pole on the
southwest side at 72 - 26 south, 67 - 30 west;
-
No. 5 near Phocylides Crater in the
southwest quadrant at 50 - 53 south, 57 - 49 west;
-
No. 6 southwest of the Ocean of
Storms at 9 - 26 south, 66 - 52 west;
-
No. 7 northeast of the Apollo
14landing site near the center of the near side of the moon at 1
-23 south, 12 - 27 west.
The back-up locations on the far side of
the moon are at: No. 1, Jules Verne Crater roughly 36 degrees south,
147 degrees east; No. 2 southeast of Pasture Crater at 13 • 36
south, 108 - 26 east; No. 3 southwest of Compton Crater at51 - 3
north, 95 - 0 east.
The Soviet intentions toward us when
Nuclear War One finally erupts are becoming all too clear because as
of November 10,
1977, I am informed that Soviet agents are still at work throughout
the United States mining additional targets for eventual destruction
by remote control. One target area to which I believe I should call
specific attention is the Kensico Reservoir just north of White
Plains, New York. On September 21, 1977, two months ago, I was
called by the FBI to ask for any information I could give them about
the situation there. They had been tipped off that the Kensico
Reservoir might be in danger in some way and wanted to know what I
could tell them. I told them what I am telling you now, that there
is a Soviet nuclear mine on the upstream side of the dam toward the
east end.
I also gave the FBI the locations of
other Soviet nuclear devices in the area—such as one each in the
south end of Pocantico Lake, another in the east end of Tarrytown
Reservoir, and one in the Hudson River near the east end of the
Tappan Zee Bridge. Whatever the FBI may have intended to do with
this information, nothing has been done—the bombs are still there.
It may well be that they were simply overtaken by events and their
hands tied before they could do anything, because it was only six
days later—September 27, 1977 - that America lost the Battle of the
Harvest Moon and Andrei Gromyko delivered an ultimatum to Jimmy
Carter for America to start towing the Soviet line. But whatever the
reason, the FBI’s concern over the Kensico Reservoir leads me to
believe I should call special attention to it.
Should the Kensico Reservoir be ruptured, the first victims will be
the Holy Name School, situated like the Toccoa Bible College in the
shadow of the dam. But beyond that, flood waters from Kensico
Reservoir would rampage through White Plains and on southward
perhaps all the way to the North Bronx, New York City. The
devastation and loss of life would almost certainly dwarf anything
like had ever been seen in America, yet no one is doing anything
about it. A major insurance company learned recently from British
intelligence about the situation at Kensico Reservoir and went to
the New York City police about it—to no avail. Therefore apparently
all I can do is to warn you. My friends, what I have said in
Audioletter No. 24 for May 1977, I repeat again now. Behind the
scenes maneuvering and trickery can lead only to disaster for
America. Only TOTAL EXPOSURE of what is happening has any hope at
all of turning the tide against utter catastrophe. I have pledged to
continue doing what I can toward this end, and I ask you to join
with me in this very important effort.
Until next month, God willing, this is Dr. Beter. Thank you, and may
God bless and protect each and every one of you.
|