Audio
Letter #75
Hello, my friends, this is Dr. Beter. Today is May 31, 1982, and
this is my AUDIO LETTER® No. 75.
Here, in the United States, today is a major holiday, Memorial Day.
For most of us it’s a day off from our jobs, a day for picnics or to
visit friends and relatives. The Memorial Day week-end is famous for
traffic jams, highway accidents, and the Indianapolis 500 Auto Race.
And Memorial Day is a seasonal turning point, marking the beginning
of the traditional summer vacation season. Most of us tend to
welcome Memorial Day as the gateway to summer, but Memorial Day also
has a more solemn meaning which we sometimes forget. It’s the day we
have set aside to honor the Servicemen who have died fighting for
our country. Memorial Day is a reminder that war has become a stark
reality for America time after time, and each time the cost in human
lives has been tragic.
As I look ahead to the summer of 1982 now beginning, it’s with mixed
feelings. Like most other Americans, I’m looking forward to the
activities that make the summer vacation season a time to enjoy; but
the summer ahead will also be a time of increasing danger for
America.
The timetable for nuclear war which I made public three months ago
in AUDIO LETTER No. 72 is still in effect, my friends. That
timetable calls for NUCLEAR WAR ONE to erupt by mid-September 1982,
barely three months from now. The American Bolsheviks who now
control the United States Pentagon are not slowing down in their war
preparations. This is true in spite of the fact that part of their
war plan has been crippled, as I detailed last month.
The covert warfare that spawned the so-called Falklands crisis has
all but ruined the Pentagon plans for final victory in the coming
war; but the Bolshevik war-planners here have a suicidal streak in
their thinking, and they are bent on war regardless of the
consequences.
As I say these words, headlines are growing larger and larger about
the Falklands war between Argentina and Britain. Since I spoke to
you last month, heavy losses have been reported on both sides.
Argentina has lost her only cruiser, the General Belgrano, plus
several minor vessels and a number of aircraft. Britain has so far
admitted losing five major ships—two destroyers, two frigates, and a
container ship full of war materiel. These reports reflect the scale
of the present fighting somewhat but they are incomplete and
distorted. As in every war, the truth has become the first casualty.
My three special topics for this AUDIO LETTER are:
-
Topic #1 - THE PENTAGON COUNTDOWN
TOWARD NUCLEAR WAR ONE
-
Topic #2 - THE ECONOMIC ATTACK ON THE
UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION
-
Topic #3 - BILLY GRAHAM VERSUS THE
BOLSHEVIK WAR LOBBY
Topic #1
- In AUDIO LETTER No. 73 two months ago
I revealed that an entire new nuclear war strategy against Russia is
being developed here in Washington. It is being worked out by an
elite military-planning group in extreme secrecy under the code name
“PROJECT Z.” It’s a rush project calling for NUCLEAR WAR ONE itself
to begin by September of this year 1982.
Last month I reported that PROJECT Z was continuing to move fast at
the secret war-planning room here in downtown Washington. As I
stated, the process of flushing out the basic war plan was already
under way. Now, my friends, the first complete draft of the total
PROJECT Z war plan is ready. The plan is essentially completed with
nothing left to do but make minor refinements here and there. And
now the existence of this major new United States nuclear war plan
is creeping into the news. Just yesterday, May 30, an article about
it appeared for the very first time in the New York Times. The
article, by Richard Halloran, carries the headline,
“PENTAGON DRAWS UP FIRST STRATEGY
FOR FIGHTING A LONG NUCLEAR WAR.”
The article begins, quote:
“Defense Department policymakers in a new five-year defense plan
have accepted the premise that nuclear conflict with the Soviet
Union could be protracted, and have drawn up their first
strategy for fighting such a war.”
The article goes on to mention that the
plan is laid out in an unpublished document of 125 pages. It’s been
drafted for approval by Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger. My
friends, I’ve reported many times now that the United States
Pentagon is controlled by the Bolsheviks who formerly controlled
Russia. I’ve also identified Weinberger as the highest visible agent
of the Bolsheviks here in the United States Government today.
The nuclear war plans of the Bolsheviks here are moving fast; but as
I have also reported before, the United States Government today is a
house divided. The Bolsheviks are opposed by their bitter rivals,
the Rockefeller cartel. Their top visible operative in the federal
government today is Secretary of State Alexander Haig. The often
visible feuding between Haig and Weinberger is only a pale shadow of
this deadly power struggle behind the scenes. Unlike the Bolsheviks
here, the Rockefeller faction do not want nuclear war. In a word,
they cannot afford it. They would lose everything, and so the
Rockefeller faction here is working feverishly to head off the
Bolshevik nuclear war plan.
The new anti-Bolshevik rulers of Russia are also against nuclear
war. The anti-Bolshevik, anti-nuclear-war attitudes of the
Rockefeller cartel and the Kremlin has led to a limited coalition
between them in recent months. The most spectacular result so far
from this Rockefeller-Russian coalition is the Falklands war now
raging between Argentina and Britain. In AUDIO LETTER No. 74 last
month I reported what the Falklands war is all about. It is the
visible aftermath to covert warfare which took place during April.
The Rockefeller cartel and the Russians joined forces to destroy
certain major military installations and weapons reserves. These
were key ingredients in the final phase of the PROJECT Z war plan.
The whole operation began at South Georgia Island on April 3. With
the help of Argentina a joint Rockefeller-Russian commando team was
able to knock out the giant hidden naval base there. The base, built
during the 1960s, was originally controlled through the United
States Government by the Rockefeller cartel, but the Bolsheviks here
acquired control of the bases about three years ago when they seized
control of the American Pentagon. Last month I detailed how the
attack on the base was carried out. It was contained within a giant
man-made cavern hollowed out inside a mountain near the water. With
the camouflaged ship entrances sealed up, the base was bombproof;
but the joint Rockefeller-Russian commando team succeeded in
attacking the base by drilling a shaft through the mountain. Then a
compact Russian neutron bomb was inserted through the shaft and
detonated inside the cavernous naval base. The process took several
weeks. The Thatcher government, which like the United States
Pentagon is Bolshevik controlled, dispatched the Royal Navy. First,
it was supposed to dislodge the heavily-armed Rockefeller-Russian
military force before it could destroy the naval base; then it was
to move on to the Falklands for the publicly-admitted fighting.
The Royal Navy arrived several days too late to save the secret base
on South Georgia Island, as I reported last month; but by that time
the panicking Thatcher government had already committed some
two-thirds of the Royal Navy to the South Atlantic. On top of that,
at least one British ship had already been sunk by Russia in
connection with the secret South Georgia operation. That left the
Thatcher government with no choice but to engage Argentina in
battle, otherwise it would have been impossible to explain away
Britain’s huge deployment to the South Atlantic, much less the heavy
losses which had been sustained.
When I recorded AUDIO LETTER No. 74 last month on April 30 the
British blockade of the Falklands was just beginning. Later that day
the entity President Reagan announced that the United States was
actively siding with Britain. The announcement was a victory for the
Pentagon war faction. Right away warfare around the Falklands
started heating up fast. On May 1 the British launched bombing raids
against the airport at Port Stanley, and on May 2 a British
submarine torpedoed Argentina’s second largest ship, the cruiser
General Belgrano. It sank within 24 hours, leaving a death toll of
more than 300 Argentine sailors. The sinking of the Belgrano was
expected to demoralize the Argentines, but instead it enraged them.
The Belgrano had been sunk at a time when it was not threatening the
British forces. The Argentines decided it was time to start playing
their ace in the hole against Britain.
Last month I reported that Argentina had been given certain promises
in return for making the secret South Georgia operation possible.
One of these was the promise of covert military assistance by Russia
against Britain. Specifically, it was pledged that the Russians
would intervene in parallel with Argentine air and naval operations
in ways designed to even the odds. In this way Argentina’s military
leaders can take full credit for both their own and covert Russian
attacks on the British. At the same time, this procedure is designed
to keep Russia’s role in the fighting obscure.
On May 4 the Argentine Air Force decided to put Russia’s promises to
the test. A pair of Fighter bombers headed out over the Atlantic to
attack the Royal Navy. Acting on reconnaissance data provided by
Russian Spy Satellites, they headed straight for the fleet. As the
two low-flying Argentine jets appeared on the horizon, they were
picked up by British fleet radar. At the same time, a Russian
Cosmosphere hovering many miles above the fleet took final aim at
one of the ships. The ship was one of Britain’s newest, most modern,
most sophisticated ships, designed specifically to shield the fleet
against air attack. The ship was a Type-42 guided missile destroyer,
H.M.S. Sheffield. Long before the two Argentine jets were close
enough to attack, the Cosmosphere fired its charged particle
beam-weapon downward at the ship. The white-hot beam of subatomic
particles blasted through the aluminum superstructure just behind
the bridge near the top of the ship. In a split second the beam
seared through layers of metal downward into the bowels of the ship.
The aluminum of the ship itself was instantly ablaze. The Argentine
Fighter pilots witnessed the spectacular explosion and intense white
flames from nearly 20 miles away. They promptly turned back toward
home, having expended no missiles. Bewildered survivors from the
Sheffield later said there had been no warning before the blast.
Argentina’s leaders are being coached by Rockefeller cartel
operatives in what to say publicly about war developments. They
claim that a French-made missile called the Exocet had been used to
sink the Sheffield; but to those who know the characteristics of the
Exocet missile, the Sheffield disaster remained a mystery. The
Exocet, my friends, is a type of missile known as a sea-skimmer.
It’s designed to skim along just above the water, striking a ship
almost at the water line. File films of the Exocet which have been
shown on TV clearly show this behavior. But the Sheffield was
blasted close to the very top of the superstructure; in fact, that
is said to be the reason for the relatively low casualty toll in the
destruction of H.M.S. Sheffield. Had the same blast been aimed low
close to the waterline, the ship probably would have heeled over and
sunk fast. Had that happened, very few of the crew would have
escaped.
On the evening of May 4, Admiral Martin Wemyss, former director of
the British naval warfare, was interviewed about the Sheffield
disaster on ABC Nightline. Ted Koppel began with the words:
“Admiral Wemyss, how is it that such
a modern ship would not have been able to first of all detect
and then destroy that Argentine aircraft?”
Admiral Wemyss answered, quote:
“I think that’s an extremely good
question, and I cannot give you a straight answer. In my book,
this should not have happened.”
For the next two weeks talks between
Argentina and Britain continued with United Nations Secretary
General Perez de Cuellar attempting to mediate.
Meanwhile, the Thatcher government continued to add to the British
armada in the South Atlantic. Even the luxury liner Queen Elizabeth
II was commandeered and turned into a troop ship. It sailed with
some 3200 troops aboard on May 12. The strategy of the
Bolshevik-dominated Thatcher government is very simple, my friends.
They know very well they are sending the Royal Navy into a trap, but
they believe that by multiplying naval strength in the South
Atlantic virtually beyond reason, they will win. They are making the
British commitment so huge compared to that of Argentina that a
total Argentine rout of the British would look unreasonable. It
would enable the question of covert Russian aid to Argentina to be
raised openly and credibly, and that could help set off the very
nuclear war which they know Russia is trying to avoid.
Following this brute-force strategy, the Thatcher government has
continued to pour every available ship into the South Atlantic fray.
As of now, over 100 British ships are either in the war zone or
heading toward it. That’s almost the entire Royal Navy! The attitude
is: for every ship the Russians and Argentineans sink, the Thatcher
government will just send two more—anything to make sure Britain
retakes the Falklands because if that is not accomplished, the
Thatcher government will fall and that will be a setback to
Bolshevik power in Britain. On May 19 the last ditch talks at the
United Nations finally collapsed. Britain was ready at last to
invade. After talks ended that evening, it was announced that the
British War Cabinet would meet the following morning. Supposedly the
meeting would decide whether to give the go-ahead for invasion—but
it was all a ruse to help create an element of surprise against
Argentina and against Russia.
The first stage of an elaborate invasion strategy was already going
into action. On the evening of May 19 the British invasion fleet was
divided up into two groups—one group was 150 miles due east of Port
Stanley; the other, 100 miles to the northeast. Shortly before
midnight Washington time, both invasion forces started heading
toward shore. Russian Cosmospheres and submarines went into action
working together. Both British assault groups came under fire. At
least two ships critical to the assault were hit and heavily
damaged. By 2:00 A.M. Washington time both assault forces aborted
their moves toward the Port Stanley area. In response, Russian
forces disengaged. The Russians believed they had thwarted the
British invasion; but, my friends, they were wrong.
The two large invasion groups threatening Port Stanley the night of
May 19 were actually carrying out a diversionary action.
British strategists knew that the Russians had the muscle available
to stop any invasion. The only chance of success lay
in convincing the Russians that they had stopped the invasion, and
then somehow sneaking troops ashore. So the two large
invasion forces of May 19 actually were staging a decoy action! Most
of the British invasion troops were no longer aboard the troop
carrier Canberra or the assault ships. Instead, they had been
transferred to other ships which normally are not used for
amphibious purposes.
On the morning of May 20 the elaborate British deception continued.
Up until the previous day, British statements had been referring to
an imminent all-out invasion, but on the morning of May 20 the
statements changed abruptly. British Defense Ministry spokesmen
suddenly started saying that the British would confine themselves to
small hit-and-run raids for a while. The Bolshevik military planners
in London wanted to further convince Russia that the invasion had
been stopped the previous night. It worked.
Small groups of British ships began moving around the Falklands as
if to plant small raiding parties here and there. In the early
morning darkness of May 21 one of these small groups of ships moved
into the north end of Falkland Sound between the Islands. Contrary
to press reports, the troop ship Canberra was not among them, nor
was an assault ship. Those ships would have tipped off the Russians
monitoring everything from Cosmospheres far above that a major
landing was afoot. Instead, the key ship that moved into San Carlos
Bay was the hospital ship Uganda. Under cover of darkness the Uganda
moved close to shore. British assault troops, crammed like sardines
into the Uganda, clambered down the sides of the ship on rope
ladders into motor launches.
The launches ferried the troops a short
distance ashore, one group after another. As soon as they were
ashore, the troops had orders to spread out fast. In that way they
rendered themselves unsuitable targets for any attack by the Russian
Cosmospheres patrolling miles above. Particle beam-weapons are
devastating against concentrated targets but very inefficient
against personnel scattered over a wide area. By dawn other ships
had also disembarked troops in the same manner. By the time daylight
revealed what was really going on, it was too late. The British
invasion of the Falklands was underway. Once the British got ashore
with a sizeable number of troops, Britain’s chances of regaining
control of the Islands started increasing fast. Covert Russian help
for the Argentines is much more feasible at sea and in the air than
on land.
In the past 10 days we’ve heard about a number of devastating air
attacks by the Argentines. Up to now the British have admitted
losing at least five ships plus several helicopters and Harrier
Jump-jets, but slowly the British ground forces have been reinforced
and started advancing across East Falkland Island towards Port
Stanley. As of today, May 31, British ground forces are said to be
closing in on the main Argentine garrison at Port Stanley. The
operation is being portrayed in the news here as a relatively easy
task, but that is far from true.
British casualties in land battle have been far greater than
admitted, and at sea the Royal Navy has taken very heavy losses that
are not even hinted at so far in the news. Many ships have been
badly damaged; and all—I repeat, ALL—of the original contingent of
the Sea Harrier Jump-jets have been put out of action. Both British
aircraft carriers, the Hermes and the Invincible, have been rendered
incapable of launching jets. The Harriers now operating around the
Falklands are a different type from the sharp-nosed, blue-painted
Sea Harriers. They are painted in green and brown camouflage. My
friends, they are United States Marine Corps Harriers, and they are
operating from an American ship!
The things I am revealing here, my friends, are at variance with
official stories, but this is the war you never see. Photos of
British amphibious exercises taken at Ascension Island were passed
off as pictures of the Falklands invasion. British Broadcasting
Corporation broadcasting facilities on Ascension Island were taken
over weeks ago by British military. Now we hear daily reports from
Ascension Island that are claimed to be originating with the task
force. Even more than usual, the truth has been the first casualty
in the Falklands war.
The Bolshevik military planners here and in the Thatcher government
in Britain are trying to find some way to use the Falklands war for
their own purposes. Up to now they still are not slowing down in
their fast timetable for NUCLEAR WAR ONE. Within a few short weeks
there will be a highly visible clue to the status of the Bolshevik
nuclear war schedule. I am referring, my friends, to the upcoming
fourth space shuttle flight. All the space shuttle flights up to now
have been military in nature, as I have detailed in the past. The
space shuttle is the Pentagon’s only hope to regain a military toe
hold in space for the coming war. Now for the first time it is even
being admitted that the next shuttle flight will be military.
Shuttle flight #4 is presently scheduled for June 27, less than a
month from now. If some excuse is found to delay the flight, it will
reflect a slowdown in the nuclear war plans of the Pentagon; but if
Shuttle #4 takes off on schedule, it will indicate that the
Bolsheviks here are still sticking to their September war-deadline.
In AUDIO LETTER No. 73 I reported that for the first time the
shuttle had been successful in its prime military mission. A
hardened laser-armed Super-Spy Satellite was orbited in March to
obtain fresh reconnaissance data on Russia. It’s the first updating
of Russian target data since Russia destroyed America’s Spy
Satellites some four years ago. Target data from the new satellite
has now been integrated into the PROJECT Z nuclear war plan which I
made public in AUDIO LETTER No. 73. Now, Space Shuttle #4 is being
prepared for a different mission. Under the PROJECT Z war plan, the
coming nuclear war will begin with a surprise nuclear attack by
American Stealth planes into Russia. They will attempt to knock out
all of Russia’s space bases—four Cosmodromes for rockets plus
Cosmosphere installations in Siberia. If all goes as planned, all of
these installations will be blown up with H-bombs simultaneously. As
soon as that happens, the rest of America’s nuclear arsenal is to be
launched at Russia, as I have described before.
But there remains one weak point in the Bolshevik first-strike plan
against Russia. As it stands now, the Bolsheviks here will have to
assume that the first phase of the attack plan has succeeded as of a
given time. The reason is that the United States currently has no
means of verifying if the initial Stealth attack has succeeded. When
Russia destroyed America’s Spy Satellites four years ago she also
destroyed our high-flying Early Warning Satellites. That leaves the
Bolshevik war planners hare without any way to tell if their bombs
have exploded in Russia. Space Shuttle #4 is intended to solve that
problem within weeks from now!
The supersecret Department of Defense pay load is a cryogenic
infrared Sensor System. It’s designed to look down at Russia from
geostationary orbit. It will detect the explosions of American
H-bombs in Russia when it happens. The moment that it flashes a
signal confirming the explosions to the Pentagon, the rest of the
American nuclear first-strike against Russia will be set in motion.
In order to do its job, the Air Force infrared Sensor has to be
placed in geostationary orbit. That orbit is over 22,000 miles high
over the equator. The shuttle itself cannot go that high; it can
only go to low Earth orbit, perhaps 150 miles up. To take the Air
Force Sensor System the rest of the way, it has to be mounted on a
rocket. The shuttle will carry the whole assembly—Sensor System,
rocket, and all—into low Earth orbit. From there the rocket will
take the Sensor System out to the desired location far above the
equator.
My friends, as of now the countdown toward NUCLEAR WAR ONE is still
being continued by the Bolshevik war planners in the Pentagon. The
Falklands crisis began as an effort to prevent or delay nuclear war,
but it may instead end up helping to set off that very war! If so,
America’s fourth space shuttle flight could turn out to be America’s
final manned mission into space. The Air Force sensor to verify
success of America’s coming initial attack on Russia will eventually
be destroyed by Russian space weapons. Before that can happen, the
Bolshevik planners in the Pentagon will try to set off NUCLEAR WAR
ONE.
Topic #2
- For two months now the Falklands
crisis has dominated the news. Likewise, the growing threat of
nuclear war and mounting anti-nuclear sentiment have been making
headlines; but for millions of Americans, a different crisis seems
far more important. It is a long-term crisis which has been with us
for many years now.
This mounting crisis, my friends, is
that of the crumbling United States economy and the United States
dollar. Just this month, May 1982, there has been all sorts of bad
news on the economic front. On May 7 the Government announced that
unemployment, as officially calculated, had reached 9.4 per cent,
the highest level since the Great Depression. And just five days
later there was another shock—Braniff Airlines abruptly terminated
operations and filed for bankruptcy. It was the first time ever that
a United States trunk airline had failed. Braniff, like more and
more other businesses, was brought down by a mountain of debt. With
interest rates remaining sky high in the midst of a deep recession,
more and more companies simply cannot survive. Production cutbacks,
layoffs, and bankruptcies are continuing to spread, and more and
more people are losing their jobs. This recession is especially
cruel because it is an inflationary recession.
We’re now living in the STAGFLATION era which I warned about in my
book THE CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE DOLLAR nearly ten years ago. The
deliberate plans which were set in motion long ago to destroy the
United States dollar are now far advanced. Since 1970 the combined
effects of inflation and taxes have cut the purchasing power of the
dollar by 55 per cent. A family of four living on $10,000 in 1970
would need well over $23,000 in 1982 just to stay even, and this
historically unprecedented collapse of the dollar is continuing even
as people are thrown out of work.
For months now the battle over the federal budget has been dragging
on, day in, day out. We’re told constantly that the
budget is the key to bringing down the incredible interest rates
that are killing the economy, and yet somehow it seems that no one
can agree about what the budget should be. One budget proposal after
another has come up for consideration only to be voted down. First,
there was the Reagan Administration budget which went nowhere. Then
all kinds of alternative budgets started being proposed. There have
been Republican budgets, Democrat budgets, Conservative budgets,
Liberal budgets, compromise budgets; and every single budget
proposed so far has been voted down. There is more and more talk
that the federal budget process has gone sour, that there is
something fundamentally wrong. On May 28 the entity President Reagan
denounced the budget process while he was in Santa Barbara,
California, to make a speech. He said, quote:
“The United States Government’s
program for presenting a budget, or arriving at a budget, is
about the most irresponsible, Mickey-Mouse arrangement that any
governmental body has ever practiced. It’s called the
‘President’s Budget’ and yet there is nothing binding about it.
It is submitted to the Congress and they don’t even have to
consider it.”
My friends, please note carefully how
this criticism by the President was phrased. I suggest you stop your
recorder and play it back again because the entity Reagan was not
just delivering a standard political tongue-lashing at his political
opponents. He was condemning the process itself, and he added,
quote:
“I think that some real solid thinking should be given now to a
budgeting process that befits the great government of a great
nation.”
My friends, Reagan’s choice of Santa Barbara, California, for this
statement was symbolic. It so happens that the so-called “solid
thinking” he recommended for a new budgeting process has already
been done; and as the President knows very well, that thinking was
done in Santa Barbara at a tax-exempt foundation called the “Center
for Study of Democratic Institutions.”
That is where the secret new
Constitution for America was written, including detailed new
provisions for the budgeting process! Seven years ago in 1975 I
published a pamphlet in which I reviewed the secret new Constitution
from a legal perspective. The entire text of the new Constitution is
contained in the pamphlet. If you have a copy, you can read about
the proposed new budget process for yourself. It’s all there in
black and white. Important passages to look at include:
-
ARTICLE IV—THE PLANNING BRANCH,
Sections 2, 4, and 7
-
ARTICLE V—THE PRESIDENCY,
Section 1
-
ARTICLE VI-(b) - THE HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES, Section 8
What you will discover if you trace
through the budget process described in the new Constitution is very
significant. When all the legal-sounding mumbo jumbo is stripped
away, the whole budget process turns out to be firmly under the
thumb of the President. For example, Reagan complained in Santa
Barbara that the “President’s Budget”, quote:
“...is submitted to the Congress and
they don’t even have to consider it.”
My friends, the secret new Constitution
would fix that.
ARTICLE VI-(b), Section 8 begins, quote:
“The House shall consider promptly
the annual budget.”
What’s more, the House is given no role
in formulating the Budget. If they dare to object to anything, the
Budget goes back to the Planning Board, so called, controlled by,
you guessed it, the President.
The Reagan blast about the budget process is just the latest of an
on-going series of covert moves to pave the way for the new
Constitution. What makes this one more significant is that it is
tied in with powerful economic forces which are intended to speed up
the process.
Through months of contrived haggling, the “kept” Congress has been
sensitizing Americans to the budget problem and they have been doing
it at a time when uncertainty over the Budget is being blamed for
worsening economic woes!
Now along comes the President saying that the solution is to change
the whole process.
The growing Budget crisis is also tied in with another major change
which the entity President Reagan has been publicly advocating. That
change, my friends, is the proposed “Balanced Budget Amendment” to
our present UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. There is a drive underway
right now to call a Constitutional Convention in order to introduce
a balanced budget amendment. Already most of the required number of
states have ratified the call for such a convention! At the moment,
if just three (3) more states ratify it, a Constitutional Convention
will be legally required to be called. The excuse for calling a
Constitutional Convention would be to introduce the Balanced Budget
Amendment.
The problem is that once a convention is
called, there’s no way to keep it from turning into a runaway
convention, re-writing the entire CONSTITUTION! In fact, that’s
exactly how our present UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION was created. The
original idea was to simply amend the “Articles of Confederation”;
but once the Convention was through, a totally new constitution
emerged.
Those who are behind the drive for a new Constitutional Convention
now want the same thing to happen again; and if it does, they have
their model for a carefully manicured DICTATORSHIP Constitution
ready to go!
In the past there have been several other drives like the present
one to call a Constitutional Convention. Each has been built around
some pet idea of one kind or another, but each time the drive has
fizzled out. Enough people have recognized the danger of a runaway
Constitutional Convention to prevent its happening. This time,
though, the danger is much greater than ever before because this
time the excuse for the proposed convention is tied directly to
people’s pocketbooks. We’re being told by various financial
spokesmen on television that high interest rates are responsible for
our economic woes, which is a half truth. We are also told that
government deficits are responsible for keeping those disastrous
interest rates high. Then we are treated to the spectacle of a
government seemingly unable to decide on a budget. And, finally,
whenever a budget is passed, it will contain the biggest deficits in
history—well over one hundred billion dollars.
Against that background, the promise of relief by way of the
Balanced Budget Amendment may prove too tempting to resist. If so,
the drive to call a Constitutional Convention will succeed, and in
the process we Americans will have sold our birthright for a mess of
pottage!
My friends, all of this may sound almost irrelevant right now in
view of the specter of possible nuclear war by the end of summer,
but never forget that the plans for war are the plans of men,
nothing more. Those plans have a way of going awry in many cases;
and in the case of those nuclear war plans, feverish attempts are
underway to make them go awry.
The Bolshevik war planners who control the Pentagon want nuclear
war; but their anti-Bolshevik enemies who now rule Russia don’t want
war and are trying to prevent it. Likewise, the Rockefeller cartel
here in America is in a power struggle against the Bolsheviks in an
attempt to stop the war plan. If the Rockefeller interests do
succeed in regaining control of the United States Government, they
plan to stop the Bolshevik war countdown. But the Rockefeller group
are fighting this battle only for themselves, my friends, not for
you or me! It is they who are behind the secret new Constitution and
the drive for a Constitutional Convention. If they succeed in
beating the Bolsheviks here, they intend to capitalize. With their
secret new Constitution they plan to bring us under their domination
more completely than ever before.
In AUDIO LETTER No. 72 three months ago I reported that a military
coup d’etat was in gestation here in Washington. This is to be a
coup by the Rockefeller cartel operatives within the Government
against Bolshevik operatives. The man in charge is a four-star
General—Alexander Haig.
Up to now the anti-Bolshevik coup has not been accomplished, but it
is gaining ground. One major gain for the Rockefeller faction
occurred last month while all eyes were on the Falklands crisis. On
April 21 it was announced that Admiral Bobby Inman, Deputy Director
of the CIA, had “resigned” (quote) effective immediately. Inman was
forced out by the Rockefeller faction. He was replaced with
lightning speed by John McMann, a career professional with the CIA!
It was the Rockefellers who created the CIA long ago as their own
private detective agency, and now they are working fast to
re-establish the control which they lost over the CIA three years
ago.
The infighting between the Rockefeller and Bolshevik factions within
the Government is growing more intense as the war fuse burns shorter
and shorter. President Reagan and Secretary Haig are both under
tight security. This summer of 1982 will be dangerous for them and
for America.
Topic #3
- On the evening of May 16 millions of
Americans tuned their television sets to NBC to watch the first
installment of a special mini-series. It was a lavish portrayal of
the travels and adventures of Marco Polo. For the next four nights
viewers were treated to a spectacular re-enactment of Marco Polo’s
experiences as he traveled to China. Interspersed with those scenes
of adventure and splendor were brief scenes depicting what happened
to Marco Polo after he returned home to Venice. He dared to speak of
places he had been and things he had seen that conflicted with the
dogma of the day, and so he was tried for heresy.
Today in 1982 we like to think of ourselves as too enlightened to
close our minds like the inquisitors of Marco Polo, but the
fact is that even today those who challenge preconceived notions are
quickly branded as heretics and the like. There was a perfect
example of this on Sunday morning May 16. Ironically it was the same
day as the beginning of the Marco Polo series. My friends, I’m
referring to the interview of evangelist Dr. Billy Graham on the ABC
news program “This Week with David Brinkley.” Dr. Graham had just
returned to England from participating in a five-day religious
conference in Moscow, Russia, of all places. He was one of more than
400 religious leaders from 80 nations who attended the conference.
They were there at the invitation of the Russian Orthodox Church
which sponsored the Conference. A large fraction of those who
attended were Christian leaders such as Dr. Graham, but there were
also many representatives of the world’s other great religions. They
were not there to convert, to compete, or to condemn one another.
Instead it was a rare opportunity for these leaders to form bridges
of mutual understanding, something which is all too often neglected
in our world.
It was a religious conference the likes of which the world has not
seen for more than 80 years. The last time anything like this took
place was before 1900. It was held here in America, in Chicago, and
it was called “The Parliament of Religions.” There were some who
feared that historic meeting of the minds and have condemned it ever
since. As a result, it has never been repeated here in America; but
I submit, my friends, that those fears were groundless. The
Parliament of Religions did not destroy Christianity or turn
Americans overnight into Buddhists, Moslems, or Hindus. What it did
do was to establish bonds of understanding and respect for a while
where they had been lacking before. My friends, it is a
psychological fact that it is usually hard to hate another person if
you get to know him. That is why any government bent on war tries to
dehumanize and depersonalize the enemy.
From the turn of the century onward, the United States Government
has been controlled by elements who cherish war as an instrument of
policy, so we see no more Parliaments of Religion here in America.
By contrast, the government of Russia has undergone a drastic
transformation in recent years. Russia’s new rulers are Christians,
as I have been reporting for nearly five years. After an agonizing
struggle of six decades, these tough native Russians have finally
gained the upper hand over the Satanic Bolsheviks there. Over three
years ago the growing power of the Kremlin Christians started
producing startling changes in public. For example, for Easter 1979
Handel’s “Messiah” was performed in Russia for the very first time
since the Bolshevik Revolution! And several months before that, in
January 1979, the first legal shipment of Bibles into Russia since
1917 had taken place. The American Bible Society had asked the
Russian government for permission, and it had been granted.
In AUDIO LETTER No. 44 over three years ago I issued an appeal to
America’s Christian leaders to take a stand for peace before it was
too late. What I suggested was a “Pilgrimage for Peace” to Moscow.
It’s purpose would have been to begin new ties of trust and
understanding with the new Christian rulership of Russia. In that
way America’s churchmen had the opportunity to take the initiative
in a concrete way to help head off nuclear catastrophe. The
response, as I reported later, was pathetic. To the everlasting
shame of America’s Christian community, only a tiny handful of
Christian leaders expressed any interest at all! The Christian
leaders of America by and large refused to hold out the hand of
Christian fellowship to their brothers in Russia.
But now, a pilgrimage for peace has been made to Moscow after all.
Since America’s Christian leaders would not bother to take the
initiative, those of Russia did so instead! They invited religious
leaders the world over to make a pilgrimage for peace to Moscow, and
they called their five-day assembly the, quote:
“Conference of Religious Workers for
Saving the Sacred Gift of Life from Nuclear Catastrophe.”
When Billy Graham and some other Western
Christian leaders arrived in Moscow, they soon discovered that it
was not as they had been led to expect. Dr. Graham discovered that
there was no attempt to restrict him in his religious messages. He
was also allowed more freedom of movement than he had expected. On
the Saturday evening before the Conference began, Dr. Graham decided
to pay unannounced visits to several Moscow churches. He went to
three different Russian Orthodox Churches and was shocked to find
that they were filled to capacity with worshippers. As he said later
in a news conference, quote:
“You would never get that in
Charlotte, North Carolina.”
Dr. Graham made a number of statements
about his experiences in Moscow which all seem to add up to one
thing: there is a lot more Christian worship going on in Russia than
he apparently expected and with greater freedom.
When Billy Graham returned to the West he must have felt a little
like a religious Marco Polo. He had journeyed to the forbidden East
and discovered that it is not populated by gremlins and horrible
beasts. Instead he had come away with his heart strangely “warmed”
(quote). Perhaps he expected that the folks back home would welcome
his unexpected good news. After all, our whole Christian faith is
built on Good News—the Gospel of our LORD Jesus Christ. But if that
is what Billy Graham expected, he was sadly mistaken.
When he returned to the West, he came back not to people eager to
hear more of his good news, but to hostility and condemnation! We’re
always told that Russia is an atheistic country and beyond
redemption, and so by definition Billy Graham’s words about even
limited religious freedom in Russia constituted heresy. He ran into
a buzz saw of critics determined to cut him down for saying a good
word about Russia!
It began right away with slanted reports about his statements in the
major media. At one point Dr. Graham mentioned that in Russia his
comments had been reported accurately in the press. By contrast,
reports here in the United States were distorted, and quoted him out
of context.
A perfect example of the treatment now being given Dr. Graham was
his May 16 interview on ABC’s “This Week with David Brinkley.” It
was called an interview, but inquisition would be a better
description. Every suggestion that Christians may be better off in
Russia today than in the past was met with hostility. Time after
time after time Dr. Graham was interrupted and attacked before he
could even finish making his point, and many of the questions in the
best tradition of heresy trials were designed to declare Graham
guilty before he could even answer! To take just one example: at one
point the ideological writer George F. Will mentioned an incident in
which a peace protestor was subdued by Russian police. Then he
asked—and this is an exact quote:
“Given that evidence that there is
no, and is not about to be, any peace movement in the Soviet
Union, wasn’t it clear to you from the start that this
propaganda festival to which you were going was used simply to
encourage a unilateral peace pressure and disarmament pressure
in the West?”
My friends, a so-called question like
that is the tool of a prosecutor, not an objective reporter. In one
breath he claimed that there is no peace movement in Russia as if it
were a fact, accused Dr. Graham of knowingly cooperating in Soviet
propaganda, implied that all the world religious leaders who
attended were stooges, and ignored the world-wide representation at
the Conference saying it was all aimed at the West. Accusing
questions like that were fired at Dr. Graham throughout the program.
The only break in this inquisition came when Dr. Graham was removed
from the discussion for a while—then everyone else sat around and
ripped him up one side and down the other in his absence, for his
‘heresies.’
In spite of the grossly unfair treatment, Rev. Graham made some very
telling points. He mentioned that many other American Christian
leaders were also at the Moscow Conference and that still others
have gone there separately, and he said there are many, quote:
“...that would hold different
viewpoints than what is being expressed here today. I’m a little
surprised that we don’t have some of those people.”
Perhaps Dr. Graham’s most telling
comment came fairly early in the program; perhaps it was partly
responsible for the frenzied bitterness of some of the attacks on
him later in the program.
Rev. Graham said, and I quote:
“Now when people go to China today,
for example, they are applauded for going to China. It’s
wonderful to go to China, but there is not as much religious
freedom in China as there is in the Soviet Union.”
My friends, Billy Graham was exactly
right in that statement. I have reported the same thing in my AUDIO
LETTER reports. The favorable image now being given to Red China is
purely political and military in its origins. Unfortunately some
church-related groups are being used for these political purposes!
What Dr. Graham may not know is the reason for the violent attacks
he has endured lately. My friends, he has run afoul of the American
Bolshevik nuclear-war lobby here. They want to use you and me to do
their dirty work for them against Russia. That is what their
nuclear-war plans are all about, and so at all costs they must not
let us know that Christianity is reviving today in Russia. Even
more, they dare not let the American people know that the true
leadership of Russia today is Christian because if we all knew that,
my friends, we would never agree to their plans to destroy Christian
Russia in a thermonuclear war.
LAST MINUTE SUMMARY
Now it’s time for my Last Minute Summary. In this AUDIO LETTER I’ve
tried to bring you up to date on the progress of plans to throw
America into nuclear war against Russia. The countdown by the
Bolshevik war planners who now control the Pentagon is still
continuing. Their war plans have been damaged by the Falklands war,
but they are trying to turn that conflict to their own ends.
Meanwhile, the countdown for Space Shuttle Flight #4 with its secret
military pay load is still on schedule. If the mission succeeds, the
danger of nuclear war will increase dramatically. The summer of
1982, my friends, promises to be a dangerous time for America. As of
now, NUCLEAR WAR ONE could be as little as three months away, but
the Bolsheviks here have enemies who are trying to stop the
war-countdown.
Here in the United States the Rockefeller cartel is continuing its
power struggle to take back control of the Government from the
Bolsheviks. As part of that struggle, the preparations for a
military coup d’etat led by General Alexander Haig are making
progress. Likewise, the Russians are continuing to try in their own
ways to prevent the war. Unlike the Rockefeller cartel, the Russians
are doing this for moral reasons.
This month, May 1982, religious leaders from around the world
gathered in a religious conference to take a stand for peace. If the
conference had been held, say in Washington, D.C., we would be
hearing nothing but praise about it; but it was held instead in
Moscow, Russia, and for that reason alone it has been condemned here
in the United States. Those who dare to honestly report the
favorable surprises they encountered there are being castigated as
heretics. The most visible of these is Rev. Billy Graham. For
describing what he actually saw and experienced, honestly and
without prejudice, he is being crucified on all sides.
My friends, the same thing will happen to you if you dare to speak
up about the things you know; but if you do not speak up to your
friends, to your neighbors, to your relatives, they may never know
why we are heading toward nuclear catastrophe. So I urge you to
speak now, and remember the promise of our LORD Jesus Christ. He
said:
“Blessed are they who are persecuted
for righteousness’ sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.”
Until next month, God willing, this is
Dr. Beter. Thank you, and may God bless each and every one of you.
|