| 
			
			
 
			  
			
			Former MI5 Agent Says
 
			
			
			9/11 An Inside Job 
			from
			
			ArchiveTC Website 
			Former MI5 agent David Shayler, who previously blew the whistle on 
			the British government paying Al Qaeda $200,000 to carry out 
			political assassinations, has gone on the record with his conviction 
			that 9/11 was an inside job meant to bring about a permanent state 
			of emergency in America and pave the way for the invasions of 
			Afghanistan, Iraq and ultimately Iran and Syria.
 
 David Shayler joined MI5 in October 1991 and worked there for five 
			years. He started at F Branch (counter-subversion) in January 1992, 
			and worked in T Branch (Irish terrorism) from August 1992 until 
			October 1994. He left the organization in 1996.
 
 Shayler appeared on the Alex Jones show to kick off what will be a 
			wider public campaign to educate the public on 9/11 issues and 
			government corruption.
 
 Shayler again risked jail by speaking out. The British government 
			has a legal gag preventing him from speaking about his work during 
			his MI5 tenure. Since what Shayler discussed was already on the 
			public record (a consequence of which was his imprisonment on two 
			separate occasions), he now feels safer in stepping back out into 
			the limelight.
 
 Shayler delved into his past investigations and the evidence that 
			led some within MI5 to conclude that the Israelis bombed their own 
			London embassy in July 1994. Shayler said that the Israelis framed 
			two Palestinians who remain in jail to this day.
 
				
				"The same thing has happened with two Palestinians who were 
			convicted of conspiracy to cause the attack on the Israeli Embassy 
			in Britain in 1994 but MI5 didn't disclose two documents which 
			indicated their innocence. One document indicated another group had 
			carried out the attack and the other document was the belief of an 
			MI5 officer that the Israelis had actually bombed their own embassy 
			and allowed a controlled explosion to try and get better security 
			and these documents were never shown to the trial judge let alone 
			the defense."  
			Shayler said that his suspicions were first aroused about 9/11 when 
			the usual route of crime scene investigation was impeded when the 
			debris was immediately seized and shipped off to China. 
 "It is in fact a criminal offence to interfere with a crime scene 
			and yet in the case of 9/11 all the metal from the buildings is 
			shipped out to China, there are no forensications done on that 
			metal. Now that to me suggests they never wanted anybody to look at 
			that metal because it was not going to provide the evidence they 
			wanted to show people that it was Al-Qaeda."
 
 Shayler then went on to dismiss the incompetence theory.
 
				
				"The more I look at it, you realize that it's not incompetence. 
			There were FBI officers all over the country, Colleen Rowley is 
			obviously the one who managed to get a congressional hearing, but 
			there was plenty of evidence certainly."    
				"There are so many questions that need to be answered, protocols 
			being overridden within national defense, people actively being 
			stopped from carrying out investigations. This wasn't an accident, 
			they were aware there was intelligence indicating those kind of 
			attacks, there were FBI intercepts saying it in the days before the 
			attacks. When you look at it all, that is a big big intelligence 
			picture and yet these people were crucially stopped from doing their 
			jobs, stopped from trying to protect the American people." 
				 
			Shayler elaborated by saying the evidence suggests the attack was 
			originally meant to be much wider in scope and was an attempt at a 
			violent coup intended to decapitate the entire government as a 
			pretext for martial law.  
				
				"So you're looking at a situation in which you almost have a coup 
			d'état because you've got to bear in mind that there were weapons 
			discovered on planes that didn't take off on 9/11. Now people have 
			obviously postulated that they were going perhaps to attack the 
			White House, Capitol Hill. That looks to me like an attempt to 
			destroy the American government and declare a state of emergency, in 
			fact a coup d'état, a violent coup d'état." 
 "There are so very many questions about this and you realize again 
			that none of the enquiries ever get to the bottom of any of these 
			things, they don't take all the evidence, they don't often take any 
			evidence under oath when they should be taking it under oath."
 
			Shayler was forthright in his assertion that the attack was planned 
			and executed within the jurisdiction of the military-industrial 
			complex.  
				
				"They let it happen, they made it happen to create a trigger to be 
			able to allow the invasion of Afghanistan, the invasion of Iraq and 
			of course what they're trying to do now is the same thing with the 
			invasion of Iran and Syria."  
			Shayler ended by questioning the highly suspicious nature of the 
			collapse of the twin towers and Building 7, the first buildings in 
			history, all in the same day, to collapse from so-called fire damage 
			alone.  
				
				"I've seen the results of terroristic explosions and so on and no 
			terrorist explosion has ever brought down a building. When the IRA 
			put something like a thousands tonnes of home-made explosives in 
			front of the Baltic Exchange building in Bishopsgate and let off the 
			bomb, all the glass came out, the building shook a bit but there was 
			no question about the building falling down and it doesn't obey the 
			laws of physics for buildings to fall down in the way the World 
			Trade Center came down. So you have the comparison of the two, 
			Building 7 compared with the north and south towers coming down and 
			those two things are exactly the same, they were demolished."
				 
			David Shayler joins a spate of recent credible whistleblowers who 
			share the same sentiments about the real story behind 9/11. Former 
			Chief Economist for the Department of Labor during President George 
			W. Bush's first term Morgan Reynolds publicly questioned the 
			unexplained collapse of WTC Building 7 earlier this month.  
			  
			In 
			addition, a former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under 
			President Reagan, Paul Craig Roberts, shared his concerns last week 
			when he said the Bush Administration were making the same mistakes 
			as the Nazis when they invaded Russia in the dead of winter. Roberts 
			seriously doubts the official explanation behind 9/11. 
 
			  |