The long period of extremely easy 
										monetary conditions has not generated 
										inflationary pressures in the advanced 
										market economies (AMEs), as many 
										initially feared. 
										 
										
										
										
										However, it might well 
										have contributed to further 
										misallocations of real resources in the 
										economy, to reducing potential output, 
										and to unsustainable increases in asset 
										prices. 
										 
										
										
										
										The 
										emerging market economies 
										(EMEs) have imported similar undesirable 
										forces, in part due to their own efforts 
										to hold down exchange rates subject to 
										the influence of large-scale capital 
										inflows. 
										 
										
										
										
										There seems to be widespread 
										agreement that central banks must exit 
										from these abnormal policies at some 
										point. 
										 
										
										
										
										However, uncertainty about both 
										the modalities and implications of such 
										an exit implies a bias toward this 
										happening too late rather than too soon. 
										
										 
										
										
										
										Evaluation of a number of possible 
										scenarios reveals a growing and 
										worrisome set of exposures to future 
										economic instability despite seven years 
										of extraordinarily easy monetary 
										conditions.
									
									
									
									Let's attempt to break down the above 
									pile of word goo and put it language anyone 
									can understand.
									 
									
									
									
									The long period of extremely easy 
									monetary conditions has not generated 
									inflationary pressures in the advanced 
									market economies (AMEs), as many initially 
									feared.
									 
									
									
									Explain to me why housing prices have 
									gone up as much as they have, what about 
									food, education, health care and utilities? 
									This is the first lie in the first statement 
									of this chapter.
									 
									
									
									If inflation is measured by 
									the number of MB a computer now contains 
									versus the same computer last year, then no, 
									inflation is not a real problem. However, 
									you can not eat an iPad, nor is an iPad 
									necessary to function or sustain life.
									 
									
									
									
									However, it might well have 
									contributed to further misallocations of 
									real resources in the economy, to reducing 
									potential output, and to unsustainable 
									increases in asset prices.
									 
									
									
									As Richard Fisher stated several months 
									ago, the Federal Reserve
									
									front loaded a wealth effect that now has to 
									go through a digestive period. 
									
									 
									
									
									As the 
									Federal Reserve has continued to pump up the 
									S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average 
									stock markets this has created an illusion 
									that covers up the fact the U.S. economy has 
									never recovered from the 2006-2008 financial 
									crisis the banks caused in the first place. 
									
									 
									
									
									To say these stock markets can not sustain 
									this illusion is an understatement. The 
									crash that will occur will make the previous 
									crash look like child's play.
									 
									
									
									
									There seems to be widespread 
									agreement that central banks must exit from 
									these abnormal policies at some point.
									 
									
									
									Once the current policies of 
									Quantitative 
									Easing (QE) and 
									Zero Interest Rate Policy 
									(ZIRP) are discontinued our economy will 
									come to a grinding halt. The illusion will 
									be fully exposed. You now know who is to 
									blame for this coming nightmare.
									 
									
									
									
									However, uncertainty about both the 
									modalities and implications of such an exit 
									implies a bias toward this happening too 
									late rather than too soon.
									 
									
									
									We are well past the time when the damage 
									could be contained or managed. The time to 
									have stopped this madness 
									
									was in 2008 when 
									the too big to jail banks were allowed to 
									swindle the American people out of trillions 
									of dollars of wealth. That wealth will never 
									be returned to the American people. 
									
									 
									
									
									How will 
									the G30 be able to morph this illusion into 
									the next leg of theft without blowing the 
									system apart?
									 
									
									
									
									Evaluation of a number of possible 
									scenarios reveals a growing and worrisome 
									set of exposures to future economic 
									instability despite seven years of 
									extraordinarily easy monetary conditions.
									 
									
									
									Even with seven years of ongoing, in 
									broad daylight, theft it is not enough and 
									the G30 must find a way to sustain the theft 
									or find the next economy to pillage. 
									
									 
									
									
									As soon 
									as these unrealistic economic experiments 
									come to an end there are only two outcomes 
									that I can see - the system simply implodes 
									or the Group of 30 find a way to 
									implement the next leg of theft that will be 
									sold the world as a saving grace to protect 
									them from the evils of "terrorism" or some 
									other set of lies, deceit and propaganda.
									 
									
									
									This is just the Synopsis of this one 
									chapter! As you can see each word is very 
									important and usually runs contrary to the 
									reality of what we face here in everyday 
									life. 
									 
									
									
									For those paying attention this may 
									help with a deeper understanding of what is 
									actually happening in the background. For 
									those that are new, welcome, and what you 
									have just learned can not be unlearned.
									 
									
									
									I have reached the conclusion the G30 may 
									be the most evil group of people on the 
									planet. The purpose of this group is to 
									carry forward Rothschild's original thought 
									about controlling a nations currency/money 
									supply. 
									 
									
									
									Here is what 
									Mayer Rothschild had to 
									say about the best way to
									
									steal a nations wealth:
									
										
										
										
										"Let me issue and control a nation's 
									money and I care not who writes the laws."
										
										
										
										Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1744-1812)
										
										
										
										founder of the 
										
										House of Rothschild.
									
									
									
									The G30 is charged with carrying on the 
									tradition.
									 
									
									
									Here are the faces that make up the 
									current Group of 30 (currently 32 members):