by Harry van Versendaal
June 26, 2011

from Ekathimerini Website

 

As Indignant protests enter second month,

opinions divided about nature and future of the movement
 

It's past midnight in Syntagma Square, the epicenter of Greece's month-long anti-austerity demonstrations, and Stathis Marinos is sitting at a corner cafe overlooking the colorful tent city under the trees.

 

Flipping a string of worry beads while sipping a frappe, the 37-year-old software engineer muses about Greece's financial crisis.

“The memorandum is unsustainable,” he says of the loan deal signed last year between the socialist government of George Papandreou and Greece's foreign creditors to avert default.

He thinks the debt-choked country is being stifled by a mix of brutally rigid measures - and that they must be resisted.

“But you cannot use the system to fight the system. You must not get caught up in this process,” he says, criticizing calls among protesters and pundits to declare the bailout agreement unconstitutional.

A few yards away, in the heart of the white marble square, a loudspeaker crackles with rhetorical din from the ongoing session at the makeshift assembly meeting.

 

Modeled after Spain's “Indignados” who took over Madrid's Puerta del Sol and other public squares earlier this year, Athens's “aganaktismenoi” (Indignants) have camped in the capital's main square since May 25.

 

A month after the first call on Facebook and other social media, Syntagma, or Constitution square, the starting point to the capital's main commercial street, is playing host to a postmodern incarnation of the ancient Athenian agora.

Every evening, hundreds of people gather here to discuss anything and everything about the crisis.

 

Speakers, who are chosen by lot, are given a two-minute time limit so as to allow for the greatest possible number of contributions. There is little of the typical booing and hissing, and audiences react mostly with hand gestures: waving their hands in the air for approval or giving a thumbs down when they disagree.

 

Interpretations of what is happening in the square range from the groundbreaking to the delusional or just plain silly.

“This is not a movement - and it will by no means evolve into a political party. It's more like a trend,” says Marinos, who has joined in every evening after work since day one. He has often taken part in street demos, but points out that he has never belonged to a political party.

 

“It's great that people familiarize themselves with the political process; they learn how to engage in dialogue with each other; how to participate in civic life,” he says of the meetings.

In the beginning, the Indignants were mostly portrayed as a non-political grouping. It was in the wake of a mass demonstration earlier this month that Greece's mainstream parties, PASOK and the right-of-center New Democracy, came close to clinching a unity coalition deal.

 

Talks eventually fell through and Papandreou went on to conduct a cabinet reshuffle designed to galvanize his base. He also proposed a referendum in the fall on a proposal to revise the Greek Constitution.

 

The fact that the Indignants have put pressure on the government and the politicians, some argue, means that they have now become political.
 

 

Political animals

In fact, some analysts maintain, the movement has been political from the start.

 

Costas Douzinas, a law professor at Birkbeck, University of London, recently penned one of the most flattering profiles of the Indignants in Britain’s The Guardian newspaper, after being invited to speak in Syntagma.

 

For him,

“this is the most political movement we have had in Greece, and perhaps in Europe for the past 20 years. It is totally political and in a way it changes our understanding of what politics means,” he says.

He is not alone.

 

Vassiliki Georgiadou, a political science professor at Panteion University in Athens, has kept a close eye on the demographics of the square.

 

All findings so far, she says, indicate that we are dealing with a “politically active” audience.

“These people are deeply disaffected and disillusioned with politicians, with the political parties and with the institutions at large,” she explains.

Their reaction was not a bolt out of the historical blue.

 

Most research shows that people's disaffection with Greece's social and political institutions dates back to the early 1990s. A public survey published last year found that nearly nine out of 10 Greeks are “dissatisfied with how democracy works.”

 

The local media, which have suffered their own barrage of criticism (some of it fair) as sycophants of the status quo, like to describe the movement in emotional rather than ideological terms.

“But frustration is not merely an emotional reaction. Frustration is the preamble of political protest,” says Georgiadou.

 

“Any kind of politics of resistance starts from a refusal. Refusal is the first step in any process of eventual political confrontation,” Douzinas says.

The phenomenon seems to have a dream-come-true quality for some, and Douzinas is certainly happy to connect the dots.

“Without people being in a space, taking it over and declaring their refusal of whatever it is that they want to reject, no radical change has ever taken place in history,” he says.

Skeptics, on the other hand, maintain that the memorandum is not at the root of the problem, but only a symptom.

 

Culminating to the memorandum, they say, the trail has been one of dysfunction, waste and corruption. Writing in The Guardian last week, author Apostolos Doxiadis attacked the “charlatans” who blame the evil foreigners for our own ills and failures.

 

Some soul-searching would instead be more appropriate, he reckons.

“I know that the heart of our problem is a huge, parasitic and inefficient public sector, which EU funds, unwisely and often corruptly distributed by our politicians over the past two decades, made even bigger and less productive,” he writes.

When it comes to self-criticism and proposals to overcome the crisis, detractors say, the Syntagma folk are uncomfortably laconic.

“Far form being the frontline of any kind of solid movement, the Syntagma camp-in is a confused, depoliticized, borderline-petulant response to the economic crisis,” writes Brendan O'Neill, editor of spiked website, in The Australian.

He is annoyed at the absence of any serious debate about the hard stuff.

 

Save their vociferous opposition to austerity measures,

“absolutely nothing of substance is proposed,” he writes.

What virtually everyone agrees on is that Greece is a mess.

 

Faced with bankruptcy, the country received a 110-billion-euro rescue package from the European Union and the International Monetary Fund in May 2010 but now needs a second bailout of a similar size to meet its financial obligations until the end of 2014, when it hopes for a return to capital markets for funding. International creditors have set the introduction of a painful raft of belt-tightening measures - including tax hikes, spending cuts and privatizations - as a condition for releasing more aid.

 

A critical vote is to be held in Parliament on June 29 and 30. Meanwhile, unemployment has soared to 16 percent and crime, in what used to be one of the safest states in Europe, is on the rise.

 

Anti-immigrant sentiment, particularly in the poorer neighborhoods of the capital, is spreading as once-marginal xenophobic groups are establishing a mainstream presence.
 

 

Square feat

Nicos Mouzelis, an emeritus sociology professor at the London School of Economics, goes as far as to draw parallels between the Indignants and the anti-globalization demonstrations in Seattle and Genoa - and, in a more far-fetched comparison, the events of May 1968.

 

Mouzelis, a former adviser to reformist Prime Minister Costas Simitis, praises the movement's,

“great dynamism, spontaneity and the rapid, widespread diffusion across all social strata.”

 

The protests have truly brought together a very diverse crowd - but one that is not always pulling in exactly the same direction.

Browsing through the crowd massed in the square, you encounter a motley crew of leftists railing against global capitalism and neoliberalism. Posters of Che Guevara hang next to used tear gas canisters (with “Made in USA” labels) launched by police during the recent riots. The spicy fumes wafting from the assorted stands of hot-dog vendors occasionally mixes with the pungent odor of marijuana.

 

At the assembly, people discuss the negative effects of Europe's Common Agricultural Policy on Greek farmers before talking through some organizational issues. With time, the discourse at the meetings has become more progressive and assertive. A recent resolution called for activist-style interventions like the occupation of television stations and public buildings.

 

For Marinos, some degree of radicalization is a “natural evolution.”

“You cannot make an omelette without breaking eggs,” he says.

The Indignants' decision to cordon off the Parliament building on June 15 to prevent lawmakers from reviewing the controversial midterm fiscal plan was widely regarded as the first break with the movement's non-violent stance.

 

The rally, which was also attended by thousands of union members, degenerated into violence as riot police battled with self-styled anarchists for hours. Then came the usual finger-pointing squabble over who deserves the blame for the violence.

 

A decision to give the movement a more activist orientation, some analysts say, would most likely alienate the big mass of supporters.

“Some people would like to see a fallback to traditional practices. But I am not sure that many people will want to follow,” Georgiadou says.

Interestingly, however, developments in and around Syntagma Square have thrown left-wing parties - like the Greek Communist Party (KKE) and the Coalition of the Radical Left (SYRIZA) - into disarray.

 

Early skepticism - the more sclerotic KKE went as far as to condemn the movement for not being class-driven - gradually gave way to, some say, cynical attempts to hijack the movement.

 

They are unlikely to succeed, as most protesters view them as part of the problem.

“If KKE changes, it will destroy itself,” Marinos says.

 

Dogs of war

Just up the steps from the assembly, in front of the illuminated Parliament building, a different group is chanting slogans and hurling insults against the,

“thieving politicians who destroyed Greece,” calling them to “give the money back and get the f*** out of the country.”

Demonstrators make the disparaging open-palm “moutza” gesture against the House and point green laser beams - sold here by immigrant street vendors - at television crews conveniently positioned on the balconies of the Grande Bretagne luxury hotel.

 

 

Mock gallows and banners taunting Papandreou as being “Goldman Sachs's employee of the year” decorate this part of the square.

 

Most of the acid is flung at Theodoros Pangalos, the corpulent deputy prime minister and father of the infamous “we-all-ate-the-money-together” comment.

 

Here, in this more colorful part of the new agora, is where you are most likely to bump into Loukanikos, the famous riot dog, and manic street preacher and cult TV personality Eleni Louka yelling “repent” into a megaphone as bystanders take snapshots with their cell phones.

The rowdy behavior and nationalist overtones of the people stationed in front of the House have caused occasional spats with their left-leaning counterparts down the steps.

“I don't understand what is going on down there,” Giorgos, a young man in blue jeans and a polo t-shirt, tells me while rolling a cigarette. “I don't have a solution to the crisis. All I know is that I am angry with all this,” he says.

The blanket rejectionism and often xenophobic posturing of those upstairs conveys a sense of uncertainty, of lost bearings perhaps, in a world swept up by rapid social change.

Elias Maglinis, a writer and journalist in his early 40s who lives in the nearby Mets area, is put off by some of the crass behavior.

“The gallows, the comparisons to the 1967 military coup and the slogans that the dictatorship did not end in 1973 make me angry. These people have no memory or do not know what a dictatorship or firing squad means,” he says.

At 1 a.m., the protest has petered out.

 

About 50 people remain scattered on the sidewalk of Amalias Avenue in front of the House. Some lean over the newly installed railings to taunt the baton-wielding policemen. Two middle-aged men, beer cans in hand, chat with a police chief.

 

A towering figure with a white mustache, the soft-spoken chief expresses his sympathy for the demonstrators.

“We also are suffering,” he says pointing at his men. “My salary was slashed; I am the father of three. We are here to protect the House, not them [the deputies],” he says.

Police officers, currently paid between 800 and 1,500 Euros, are in for wage cuts like all civil servants.

 

As he speaks, fireworks explode overhead as the Panathenaic stadium, the venue that hosted the first modern Olympic Games, prepares to host the Special Olympics opening ceremony.
 

 

What next?

Most analysts predict that the Indignant movement will fizzle out.

“Because these movements reject any linkages to political parties, trade unions and other well-established organizations, they do not last long,” says Mouzelis.

But the long-term impact on Greece's political culture must not be discounted.

“Politicians will not be able to operate 'as usual' anymore,” he says.

And even if the hype about direct democracy in action is exaggerated, recent developments have made people realize that they can be active citizens without belonging to any particular party or trade union.

“A democracy should welcome the existence of active citizens; it's not something to be afraid of. After all, it's better if people get together in public squares than becoming numbed couch potatoes,” Georgiadou says.

Back in the square, the assembly is voting on the resolutions proposed over the course of the day.

 

Attendants vote in favor of organizing concerts on a daily basis, but reject a proposal to invite the country's premier for talks. Decisions will soon be posted on the real-democracy website. Most of them dictate actions to be taken during the two-day general strike on Tuesday and Wednesday.

Ambling over to the crowd, Marinos says that what happens during the strike may well determine the future of the movement. He ponders the Marfin bank tragedy in May last year.

 

Three employees died when the premises were firebombed during an anti-austerity rally.

“Should there be human losses like then, the whole thing will die.”