Peter O’Toole as British Intelligence agent, T.E. Lawrence.
From Benghazi to Turkey, the ISIS "supply lines" are directly from NATO-controlled territory, and apparently it never occurs to the minds of western media to ask where, in fact, the so-called Islamic State obtains their arms.
The reason for this is obvious, as it would demonstrate that the Islamic State is not a homegrown, indigenous Wahhabist extremist group, but western creation, funded and aided like Al Qaeda since its inception, as Carter and Brzezinski openly discussed.
Not much has changed in the international terror theater since 1979, save the targets.
Counterpunch noted over a decade ago:
Concerning the aiding and funding of the updated Mujahideen-Al Qaeda-ISIS brand, Tony Cartalucci comments:
Now ISIS is both the means and the raison d'être for invading and 'saving' Syria, in the classic problem-reaction-solution strategy the West never tires from enacting in the global "freedom" war.
Acting far inferior to Peter O'Toole.
The endless, eternal war on terror is a contrived strategy of tension the Atlanticist establishment has used for over a hundred years, dating back to the exploits of Harry St. John Philby, T.E. Lawrence and the British carving up of the Middle East and special relationship with Saudi Arabia.
As mentioned, nothing has changed in the last century, other than the focal point of the terror attacks, as the Middle East must constantly be broken up, destabilized and reorganized into "micro-nations" more amenable to Washington's corrupt corporate and ideological expansionist domination.
Recent so-called "terror events" are merely dots on the long timeline of terror, a scripted narrative designed to remodel the American landscape as much as the Middle East, according to D.C. think tank machinations.
Saudi Arabia, is of course one of the world's chief funders of terror, operating as a proxy for the western elites.
...are all "Gulf Cooperation nations," arising from the aegis of the British Empire, and adopted under the U.S. empire.
And what is constantly forgotten is the origin of this cadre's alignment of the West through oil production was not merely the result of OPEC and Kissinger, it was in fact organized by Bilderberg:
Isn't it curious the GCC pro-terror states are also western-supplying oil states?
Citing William F. Engdahl in his A Century of War, Andrew Gavin Marshall writes:
In 2001, the former Saudi representative to OPEC, Sheik Ahmed Yamani, said,
Heartland versus Rimland
In other words, war is a racket, as General Smedley Butler famously stated, and the new "War on Terror" (TM) of our day is not new, but an updated version of the old British strategy of staving off Russia.
Little has changed a century later, as the major power bloc of the West, the Atlanticists still charge forward according to the Mackinder Heartland doctrine that the western merchant/banking sea power must dominate and control the Eurasian "heartland" to ensure no Eastern rivalry.
Through the export of Opium, China was subjugated, and through export of Marxism, both China and Russia experienced the havoc of western-born ideological materialism.
It is precisely this same utilitarian Anglo-empiricist, pragmatist philosophy that has ultimately turned on its own populace in a parasitical fashion unheard of for past empires.
Promising sensual and economic utopia, the Bolshevik export to Russia on the part of the Atlantic banking power is not the top-down social engineering strategy of the corporate elite upon the U.S. population itself.
The great delusion is that the West is "free," when it is entering the realm of greater enslavement than Sovietism experienced. The only difference is the foolish western populace cannot grasp their enslavement is at the hands of Marxist corporations.
The central banks, the Fortune 100 and their shareholders love cultural Marxism and command and control, socialist economic models because it is the quickest way to consolidate wealth and transfer the actually valuable assets to the controlling oligarchy.
In such a system, the opposition will inevitably all be titled "terrorists," as the appellation is already being extended beyond radical Islamists.
And after it extends beyond the average person, the conditioning will be so strong that any thoughts, words, actions or potential-pre-crime actions will also follow under the elastic notion of "terror."
Terrorism is thus a social weapon, not of indigenous, individual "actors" and lone wolves, but stage managed dupes, patsies and tools of an international oligarchical cartel, as Orwell demonstrated in 1984 with the fictional villain of Immanuel Goldstein. Indeed, who funds these groups? (We saw who, above).
The most obvious fact of the contradiction of the "War on Terror" (TM) is that it almost always works to further Washington's domestic and geopolitical aims.
Terror, then, is like Trotsky's notion of perpetual war - perpetual war on the psyche of the globe (it's a global war on terror), as a phase in the dialectical convergence on the path to global government.
That is why terrorism serves western political aims...