PART 1
by Mark Phillips
FOREWORD
"... with liberty and justice for all"
Preamble to the United States Constitution
My name is Marquart (Mark) Ewing Phillips, born May 17, 1943
in Nashville, Tennessee, I have no criminal record and I have never
been adjudged insane, I am not a scholar, professional writer, or
mental health physician. While I lack the official published
academic credentials, I am recognized internationally by mental
health and law enforcement professionals as an authority on the
secret science concerning external control of the mind.
The purpose of Part I of this book is to document how this
reputation was gained. This brief and highly condensed contribution
is intended to provide an understanding of why, when, and where I
embarked on a study of the most secret technology known to man:
Trauma-based mind control. Through the publication of declassified
United States Government documents, our U.S. Department of Defense
(DOD) admits that this ancient wizard’s mechanism for control is so
dangerous that most information pertaining to it must remain
Classified as TOP SECRET.
As the employee of a DOD subcontractor
with exposure to mind-control research, I was required to sign an
oath of secrecy. To this day I am restricted by law from revealing
certain specific information that directly pertained to my employment
as, among other "sensitive" exposures, a U.S. DOD subcontractor in
mind-control research.
This super secret technology is an evolved system of remote human
physical find psychological manipulation that has only recently been
officially recognized by accredited mental health physicians for
what it is, absolute mind control.
My first encounter with mind-control research began in the late
1960s in Atlanta, Georgia on the Emory University campus at the
Yerkes Primate Center, It was there that I learned about primate
behavior modification-the basis for human mind control. Part I of
this book is my attempt to impart an understanding of how this and
other exposures would prepare me for the Challenge of a lifetime.
What I witnessed, in terms of technology, at the Yerkes Primate
Center and Other government sponsored research facilities, combined
with years of personal research into this science of mind
manipulation, did not adequately prepare me for what I would be
exposed to in 1988 through an unexpected chain of events. This
exposure came in the form of personal acquaintance with the human
results officially entitled by DOD as, among other cryptic file
titles, MK-Ultra.1
I have outlined this noxious introduction in hopes that the material
provided by one MK-Ultra survivor, Cathy O’Brien, will incite a
legitimate federal investigation of her claims.
I was able to liberate MK-Ultra victims, Cathy O’Brien and her
daughter, Kelly, from the invisible grip of this U.S. Government
secret weapon of control. In the process, I also helped Cathy
recover her mental and physical health. However, I have not been
successful in enlisting the cooperation of my government to pursue
the justice issue. There is a reason for this failure to obtain
justice that you, the reader, NEED TO KNOW. I have been
told repeatedly, "Justice is not obtainable, For Reasons Of National
Security."
This book is primarily the autobiography of Cathy O’Brien, who did
not volunteer for service to her country, but was used her entire
life against her innate, voluntary will for perpetuating criminal
activity by many so-called leaders within the U.S. Government. These
"treasonous leaders" did volunteer for political "service" to our
country. They must be held accountable for their
actions.
Together, Cathy and I have dedicated our lives to the pursuit of
justice and rehabilitation for her and Kelly. All avenues for justice
and rehabilitative relief have been blocked For Reasons Of National
Security. The question arises, whose security? Cathy O’Brien provides
the logical answer. Perhaps after reading this work, you will inspire
others to read it. Collectively, as patriots, we can make a positive
difference for Cathy and Kelly, our government, and humanity, by
having our voices heard. In my opinion, our great United
Stales Constitution does not need to be amended it needs to be
enforced.
The grim reality we must all embrace is that there is, in human
terms, no justice, and no revenge adequate to equal what these two,
and many other victims of this U.S. Government secret weapon
experienced. The only remaining remnant of opportunity for justice
for these survivors would be derived from a public forum expose of
what they experienced.
What these survivors need to witness is the
mass dissemination of their story and a radical, positive change in
their government’s management of secrets. This would be an
acceptable, though belated, substitute for justice.
Their hope lies
in the belief that,
"Truth lives a wretched life, but always survives a lie"
1 Weinstein, Harvey M., M.D., Psychiatry And The CIA: Victims Of Mind
Control American Psychiatric Press, 1990.
Back to
Contents
CHAPTER 1
Sometimes words, or groups of words, found in the English language
have many definitions or meanings. Within each meaning there may be
different logical and Literal perceptions of the application of a
given word. However, the words mind control usually conjure up a
single response. This is most unfortunate due to the vast
differences of perception contained within the reference.
For example, if you have access to a late 1980s Random House or
later Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary and reference mind control,
you will notice there is a conspicuous absence of a listing. Should
you go one step further and secure a college professor’s teaching
copy of Oxford’s Companion To The Mind (Oxford Press 1987), you can
reference practically anything concerning research of the mind
without a reference to mind control. Perhaps you may now realize that
through Random House, Webster and Oxford Press omissions, you are a
victim of information control.
Mind control is sometimes loosely defined as information control.
This being one of many accepted ways to define the term should
immediately raise questions of distrust towards your information
sources. Since what we think is based on what we learn, manipulation
of a mind, or a nation of minds, can be accomplished through control
of information. With thought control being a result of information
control, many avid researchers of mind sciences simply label it
"soft" mind control.
These days, we live in a world in which the continued existence
of multinational businesses and governments depends upon instant communications.
However, with consideration to the so-called problem of information
overload, it would appear to most people that we hear and see enough
to make rational decisions concerning our individual lives.
Unfortunately, this is not true. What we don’t know, as evidenced by
mind-control atrocities, is quickly destroying society as we have
known it.
The answer to this problem is glaringly apparent. We, as citizens of
a supposedly free country, should not permit our government to
restrict any information that protects criminal activity under the
guise of National Security.
Secret knowledge equals power, with the end result being control.
Therefore, despite the deliberate efforts of those persons in
control of national media information management (who are not media
employees), results of secret mind-control projects gone awry have
been leaking out for years through the media. People are literally
waking up to the mind-control reality because there is an obvious
lack of logical explanation for certain sensational news events.
What really happened at Jim Jones’ Jonestown and with Sirhan Sirhan,
John Hinkley, and Lee Harvey Oswald? And, more importantly, why did
it happen? The simple common denominator existing among these persons
has been publicly slated by the media, based on research of their
medical histories, is mind control.
In reality, information control is but one component of mind
control. Whereas "brain washing," a term coined by an investigative
journalist writing about Korean War P.O.W.s around 1951, described
the results of what the Chinese regarded as thought reform.
The term brainwashing denotes to most people the destruction of a
person’s memory. This slang term continues to be used by the news
media in place of the all encompassing term, mind control. In
reality, applied brainwashing techniques are similar to those used
in trauma-based behavior modification.
During the past three decades, a significant number of religious
groups worldwide has been cited by the mainstream news media as
destructive cults. An emphasis on the word destructive is necessary
in defining these groups as cults. Random House Dictionary defines
cult as "a particular system of religious worship".
By this
definition, the word cult would encompass all religions. These
so-called destructive cults have been publicly denounced by the news
media for using brainwashing, thought reform, and mind
manipulation tactics on their believers. However, there is an obvious
lack of expressed concern by these same media as they fail to address
the underlying issues of mind control, the power basis for abuse.
Perhaps the reporting news media can not, for some reason, publicly
open the proverbial Pandora’s Box. Is it plausible then to consider
that closer scrutiny, by the media and the public, of these
destructive cults’ leadership could reveal a solid connection to
government sponsored mind-control research? These arc questions
that, in themselves properly addressed, would provide important
answers to this social epidemic involving physical and psychological
abuse. The answers that an in-depth professional investigation would
provide could be the first step in resolving the rash of problems
that destructive cults, serial killers, and sexual child abusers,
thrust upon society.
As consumers of national news media supplied information, we
continue to invent half-truths which, in this case scenario, is
seeing and hearing only what results from mass mind manipulation.
Historians provide us a glimpse into the future through recorded
events of the past. It appears that throughout recorded history, man
has, towards the end of each millennium, returned to a focus on
certain types of bizarre human behavior. For example, there has been
in the past 150 years a resurgence of wide spread interest in the
occult "black arts" which include satanism or Luciferian religions.
These constitutionally protected "religions" use trauma to control
the minds of their followers.
Mind-control practices within the occult groups (according to
survivors adjudged credible and law enforcement officials) have been
accredited with bridging the gap between applied science and
Shamanism. Occultism as a manner of religious expression has been
around for thousands of years. Only in the last 150 years has
science aggressively pursued the truths regarding mind manipulation
hidden within the occult belief systems themselves.
According Lo the Random House Dictionary, occultism "is the practice
of alleged sciences claiming knowledge of supernatural agencies
which are beyond the range of ordinary knowledge." Once again, it is
a reminder that secret knowledge equals power.
In 1971, the New York Times reported a story on the Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA) and occult research, the basis of which
was gained through a collection of documents released by the U.S.
Government Printing Office under the Freedom of Information Act.
This was a report to Congress and clearly showed that the CIA was
interested in the cause and effect clinical findings that occult
religious practices have on the Black Arts practitioner’s and/or the
observer’s mind. Of particular interest to the CIA were the
heightened levels of suggestibility that certain occult rituals
produced in the minds of the
practitioners. Cannibalism and blood rituals were ranked highest in
the order of
importance to their research.
Behavioral psychology teaches us that control of human
suggestibility is recognized as the fundamental building block for
external control of the mind. This suggestibility factor alone
potentially creates a human rights legal issue when we consider
constructing laws to protect people from overt or covert
mind-control practices. Consideration to the human suggestibility
factor could result in all forms of consumer oriented service and/or
product advertising becoming illegal.
Advertising and the marketing
of services and/or products through communications can be justifiably
defined as a type of psychological manipulation, (naught reform
and/or mind manipulation which results in a form of behavior
modification, A patriot friend, Steven Jacobson, published his book
entitled
Mind control in America 2 in 1985, eloquently exposing the
science of mind manipulation through advertising. The basis for
successfully modifying human behavior requires mind manipulation
techniques that, when expertly applied through advertising media,
become a form of "soft" mind control.
Factoring in suggestibility through the tactile senses as the
"Achilles’ heel" of the human race renders everyone vulnerable to
becoming, on some level, a victim of soft mind control.
The controversy of what is and what is not mind control rages on
among scholars in the schools of law, human rights, and mental
health. All the while the confusion of issues provides a form of
legal protection for practitioners of trauma-based mind control, the
only known form of remote human control that is absolute. All other
forms of mind control, including chemical and electronic
manipulations, are considered by mind-control experts as temporary.
There are laws protecting U.S. citizens’ rights to practice their
religious
beliefs and freedom of speech. There are no laws which specifically
protect
leaders of destructive cults and/or practitioners of trauma-based
mind control.
However, because of the U.S. Government’s use of mind control and
the broad
diversity of legal opinion concerning the accepted limits of free
speech and
religious practices, the legal loop holes for criminals employing
mind-control
techniques on their "flocks" for personal gain remain
open. For every
problem there exists a solution..
The formula for problem solving, rests firmly on the quality of the supporting research
information concerning the nature of the problem. Legislating laws
specifically to protect people from mind-control abuses would be
futile. Practically every civilized society in-existence has some
law and/or group of laws which would protect the people and punish
the practitioners of mind control. Laws are enforced according
to lawmakers’ interpretations of the specific legal language. The
lack of enforcement of laws already on the books that could protect
us from mind- control abuses stems from applied legal
interpretations and cover-ups of survivor testimony by the CIA and
National Security Agency (NSA) For Reasons Of National Security.
Mind-control atrocities, if committed by anyone who could be linked
to government sponsored projects, are typically ignored and covered
up. Access to the courts by these hapless survivors is thus
stonewalled by government paid so-called legal experts who receive
their orders from the National Security
Agency.
Defining the term "mind control" is akin to defining the limits of
the 1947 National Security Act. The basis for the solution to the
National Security controversy is simple. It is known as: Truth
logically applied.
It is an obvious truth that the National Security Act has been
interpreted, not to guard the integrity of military secrets, but
instead to protect criminal activity of the highest order.
Repeal of this Act and replacement with the established rules of
military conduct concerning National Security that do not infringe
upon the constitutional rights of America’s citizenry or the rights
of its allies would result in compliance with the Constitution.
2
ISBN # 0-911485-00-7
Back to
Contents
CHAPTER 2
-
SALESMAN, AD MAN, MIND MAN, PATRIOT
MY PERSONAL EVOLUTION
"Every revolution, bloody or bloodless, has two phases. The first is
the struggle for Freedom; the second the struggle for power. The
phase of the struggle for Freedom is divine. He who has participated
in it invariably feels, physically, that his best and most
precious-inner self has come to the surface. We know that being
faithful to the TRUTH stands higher than our own participation in
governing the country—and that is why we must not have a society
that would reject ethical norms in the name of political mirages."3
As I was saying to my grandmother, Mamaleen Johnson, "My life
has turned into a nightmare and I’m wide awake," tears were streaming
down my face, dripping off my chin onto her patent leather shoes. She
affectionately patted my shoulder as she listened.
The words we exchanged, the room’s wallpaper and furnishings, my
beloved grandmother, Mamaleen. even the taste of my tears combined
with a feeling of overwhelming grief-it is ail there etched into my
memory.
This was the summer before I was to enter my second year of school
in
1950. The first year remains a blur with cause.
Life for me and my family had changed dramatically over the previous
year. So radical a change that it had taken almost a year for me to
realize life was not becoming any easier to live. My stuttering was
getting worse. The rare moments I could speak coherently were
limited to short sentences devoid of the word "you", and then only
to my mother and grandmother. Occasionally when angry I could speak
clearly, or when alone in the woods while talking or singing to
trees.
Apparently my frustration with oral communication due to
stuttering had been intensified by a trauma I experienced the
previous year. Little did I know then that this trauma would
positively and negatively influence my future and the lives of others
I would know for the rest of my life.
On a hot and sticky Tennessee July day in 1949, my father helped
boost first my mother, then me, into the saddle astride our
four-year-old high-spirited "gift horse" Wojac. This was to be my
first ride on the back of an animal. The excitement of the moment
combined with stuttering rendered me, literally, speechless. As I
recall and from photographs taken at the time, I was wearing
as wet-soaked, pale yellow cotton shirt, dark tan shorts, brown
socks, and dirty tennis shoes. At six years old, I was very thin and
did not take up the remaining saddle space behind my mother.
With the reins in my mother’s hands, the horse responded to her
polite command of "Come on, Wojac. Giddy up." He began slowly walking
down our driveway to the narrow crushed limestone road beside our
property. Upon reaching the gravel road, the horse turned or was
guided left, momentarily disappointing me as I knew we were only
going for a short ride. It was only about a quarter of a mile to the
busy paved intersection that would be dangerous to cross. (Had my
mother decided to go in the opposite direction, we could have ridden
for a couple of miles before reaching any automobile traffic.)
As quickly as the horse made the turn from our driveway onto the
country road, my mother nudged his flanks with her heels. With
another command of
"let’s go," the horse responded with a mild jerk of motion and he
began a fast
trot down the middle of the road.
The horse’s speed, in retrospect, was too fast for safe travel on
gravel. Not knowing this then, I was not scared until I saw the
crossroads looming closer, I can hear myself half shouting
"BBBBBetter slow down. MMMight BBBBe a CCar CCComming." Before I
could enunciate the last words, my mother began a slow sideways
slide off the saddle. I could not see her face as she disappeared
under the horse, and the reins disappeared with her. The horse
bolted full speed ahead. In the blink of an eye, my realization of
being alone in the saddle with no way to control the horse washed
over me.
Quickly, I tugged on his mane to no avail. It was in this instant I
determined that the runaway horse was not going to stop for the
crossroads. I jumped. As I recall, the fall was swift and my abrupt
landing in the sharp rocks was not painful, though it seemed that my
body would never stop rolling. Panicked and with the dust beginning
to settle, I sat up, blinked the dust and sticky blood from
my eyes, and looked about for my mother. She lay in a disorganized
heap beside the road. I ran to hen
The first mental impression I experienced was that she was just
wide-eyed dazed from her fall. Then I noticed her eyes weren’t
blinking and around her head was a thick puddle of blood. Not
wanting to leave her in the road for fear she would be run over, and
not strong enough to pick her up, I began screaming in the direction
of our home in hopes that my father could hear me. Almost
immediately he responded by sprinting to us", all the while
shouting, "What happened? What happened?"
For the "life remaining in me" I could not answer for, as usual, I
was speechless. As he knelt down to speak to my mother, he stopped
mid sentence when he apparently saw her eyes in a fixed gaze and that
the back of her skull was crushed inward. Instantly he picked her
up. and as we were running back to the house, he commanded my
eleven-year-old sister to call an ambulance. To this day I cannot
recall how we got to the hospital.
The grisly scenes of this tragedy were not my nightmare. It did not
play over and over again in my mind, for I had dissociated from it. I
had voluntarily and autogenic ally created a memory barrier of this
trauma. This is a normal human response. Had I been tortured after
the trauma, I would not have been able to voluntarily recall either
the accident or the torture. Hence the basis of this book.
The nightmare began during the subsequent recovery year when we
realized my mother would never be herself again. She had lost over a
quarter of her brain when the horse stepped into her skull.
Permanently gone was her ability to smell, taste, and hear in one
ear. These were the physical handicaps she developed. Her resultant
emotional condition would become evident to me many years later. As
a child, this new awareness of my mother’s condition had minimal
impact on me compared to the fear I lived with, moment to moment,
due
to my father’s chronic alcoholism. Years later my sister would
follow his lead into a losing battle with the bottle. I was safe, as
alcohol made me stutter.
After being told so many times during my developmental years that
my mother’s condition was attributable to her brain damage, and that
my stuttering was because my brain was not working correctly, it
occurred to me at some point to learn about the brain. For years
after the accident, 1 overheard adult conversations about my
mother’s brain. My curiosity peaked about the brain and the
resultant invisible mind and had set the course for my life’s
interest.
Somewhere in this time period, I fantasized I would learn enough
about the mind and brain to help my mother and myself.
As a child, my attention span was regarded as abnormal. I was
considered very bright, yet my grades in school reflected something
different. Although not properly diagnosed, I was most likely
suffering from what is now termed Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD).
The handicaps of stuttering and ADD were to become my first personal
improvement challenges once I was out in the world on my own.
This "on my own" objective came at an early age. I was barely
sixteen-years-old when I left home to begin my pursuit of happiness.
My first efforts resulted in total failure. However, I could not
return to my parents’ home because they were now divorced.
Young, broke and rejected, I was able to determine two things.
First, I must learn how to communicate if I were to enjoy any
success in life, I went about this task methodically, first by
enrolling myself into a local night college. In the classroom I
studied speech, business law and psychology. At the library; I
studied brain functions and their effect on the mind. I was not
degree oriented because I could not earn enough at two jobs to
attend the required classes to graduate, but my studies were slowly
providing me a usable skill.
Secondly, somewhere during this period
of learning 1 began to realize I possessed a natural ability to
sell. Perhaps this ability to persuade others resulted from
my childhood experience of having to "read people" through their body
language rather than talking with them.
My first real job in sales was so successful that my client base was
reduced by my employer. I responded to this action by moving on.
The Vietnam War was heating up and I was eligible for the draft.
No longer in school, 1 knew that my number would be drawn soon. And
it was. Little did 1 know that my prayers for a deferment would be
answered and would afford me an exemption from military duty. I
would soon be working for the Ampex Corporation and with the
U.S.
Department of Defense in a civilian capacity.
The defense work
closely associated me with top research scientists working in the
area of primate and human behavior modification. Ironically, I
learned more about the mind from my casual relationships with these
scientists than I did working at the various research sites. The
sites included teaching hospitals, state mental institutions,
military bases, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
facilities, and the Yerkes Primate Center.
The following years of my corporate employment in national and international sales evolved into sales and marketing management
positions in an executive capacity. My personal life, in terms of
loving relationships, was again in shambles but my career and
ongoing mind, brain, human behavior
research was rewarding enough to compensate for my lack of emotional
expression. The secrets I had learned so well concerning powers of
persuasion, both conscious and subliminal, had long since become a
functioning part of my mind’s arsenal of defensive and offensive
tools of control.
I resolved then and there to become a "control
freak". Instead, my fantasy was not to learn what I could control but
what was controlling me. Then, around 1986, a peer friend of mine
observed that I had arrived in the proverbial "comfort zone" in terms
of presenting profitable ideas for others to set upon, and advised
me to go into business for myself. Shortly thereafter he provided me
an excellent example by resigning his six-figure executive marketing
directorship and nominated me as a candidate for his replacement.
Ironically, for the first time in my life, the nomination was
rejected because I did not possess at least a master’s degree in
business management or communications. His assistant was given the
position, and I was subsequently offered the assistant’s vacated
position with no hope of promotion, which of course I refused. Soon
thereafter, my friend, free of his corporate golden handcuffs,
established his own firm which became a very successful business.
Around this same time a childhood acquaintance, long since
socially separated from my life, reappeared long enough to introduce
me to his country music entertainment friend, Alex Houston. From
this introduction I learned this acquaintance, Ray Myers and his
wife, Regina, are alleged pedophiles who reportedly sexually molested
Cathy’s daughter and their own children. It seemed that Houston was
looking for someone with international business negotiating skills
who could assist him in putting together a large enough sales deal
to finance a manufacturing operation.
After spending a few days of
complimentary consulting time with him, I had made some rather
interesting and intriguing observations about the man and his ideas.
First of all, Houston did have a legitimate, potentially profitable
idea concerning the manufacture of an electrical capacitor device
that could increase energy efficiency for large industrial
consumers. Secondly, Houston favorably impressed me as a calculated
risk-taker. Thirdly, Houston agreed to finance my production of a
marketing plan for presentation to potential foreign buyers. And
finally, Houston agreed that I would run the company as President,
if and when I sold that plan, I thought. "No problem!"
The intriguing part of this "budding" relationship was my awareness
of Houston’s propensity for dishonesty. I felt an urgent need for
legal advice on how to insure contractual protection from Houston.
Within days, Houston and I had conceptually and contractually agreed
to start up the business. I designed a logo and assigned the name UniPhayse. The contracts we entered bound both of us to our
respective areas of commitment and was iron clad.
Houston’s
willingness to participate in my legal protection maneuver further
perplexed me, because of the obvious ’’honesty type" clauses
contained in the agreement. At the time, in my mind, I had determined
that if Houston could "keep it clean" and perform his role, we would
be able lo make this company successful. If not, I owned the company
lock, stock, and barrel and could still make it work.
Months later, with business and marketing plans in ray briefcase and
a demonstration model of the proposed product in hand, Houston and I
boarded an airplane to Hong Kong. We were met upon arrival by a
tall, well-dressed, Korean gentleman who introduced himself as
William Yoon. He owned an international shipping company. His ships
carried practically everything from scrap metal to Chinese silkworm
missiles all over the world,
Mr. Yoon, as he preferred to be called, in keeping with Far Eastern
protocol, was interested in negotiating a joint venture company with
his friends in the most populated nation on Earth, The People’s
Republic of China. All arrangements had been made by Mr. Yoon’s
staff for Houston, myself, and him to fly to Beijing the following
day to begin negotiations with the Mining Ministry. After several
days of exhausting discussions through an interpreter almost
entirely between myself and the deputy director of the Chinese
Mining Ministry, it appeared as though we had a workable deal.
An elegant banquet was ordered by our gracious Chinese hosts, and it
was there I learned that the Mining Ministry was a part of the
Chinese Ministry of Defense. Feelings of patriotism welled up in me
for the first time in my life. I
was aware that China was engaged in supplying missiles to Libya, a
Middle Eastern country with whom the U.S. was in conflict. The
Chinese were swapping missiles and other weapons for cheap Libyan
light crude oil.
The Chinese were about the only country in the world
who dared defy the Reagan Administration’s trade embargo. These
fleeting thoughts of being involved with the Chinese military felt
treasonous to me. Although uncomfortable with the idea of a business
venture with such potential for political disaster, I reminded
myself that hundreds of other U.S. companies were already in China.
Houston refused to discuss the subject.
During the return flight from Beijing to Hong Kong, I confided my
patriotic concerns to Mr. Yoon knowing that he would soon become my
business partner. He eloquently relieved my fears of potential
disaster with a complicated explanation that made sense at the time.
This man politely informed me that we could not lose money as he and
I would have interim control over all product sales revenue
generated outside of China, By Chinese law for joint venture
companies, 60% of all manufactured product must go outside China.
Houston and I returned to Tennessee and I briefly met his wife,
Cathy, for the first time when she greeted us at the gate. She
appeared to me to be young, beautiful, very dumb, and dressed like a
prostitute. I paced my walk to be several steps away from her as we
headed to the baggage claim area.
Within a few weeks of this visit, a delegation of Chinese electrical
engineers and finance experts were flown to our Tennessee office for
more negotiations and to collect technical production data (we held)
for future manufacturing purposes.
Soon after the delegation departed for China, I received a
mysterious phone call from someone at the U.S. Department of State, aka the
State Department. It seems someone in my Chinese delegation
had earlier been refused entry into this country due to his being
identified as an international weapons supplier for terrorists. This
telephone voice assured me that there were no problems that would
arise and that this information was not to be publicized. I thanked
him and assured him the information was secure.
A couple of months later, my new Hong Kong partner, Mr. Yoon,
invited me, my wife, Houston and his wife, Cathy, to come to China
for the official signing of the Chinese joint venture agreement.
When I asked Houston if he and his wife would attend, he flatly
replied, "No". He had already booked his "act" and could not cancel.
I then offered to escort his wife and mine to China. He responded
"no" again, that it was too far and too expensive for a pleasure
trip. I was relieved because I had already learned enough of the
Chinese language to know our partners did not like or respect him,
and Cathy’s demeanor embarrassed me. I later learned that Houston’s
"gig" was to "trance-sport"/transport Cathy and little
Kelly to the
infamous
Bohemian Grove for prostitution.
My trip to China with all the pomp and circumstance went well as
expected, even though my wife and I were in the process of separating
for a divorce. However, just before I was prepared to return to the
U.S., I received some extraordinary information from a man who
showed me Chinese Ministry of Defense credentials that gained my full
and complete attention. This man was in possession of a file on me
that could have only been gained through a thorough investigation of
my past professional associations.
His English skills were only
strong enough to roughly, nervously translate some of the file’s content. This man had photographic proof of a U.S. Department of
Defense security clearance I once held. He acknowledged that the
"Chinese knew all about me". Thoughts of blackmail raced across my
mind. These thoughts instantly disappeared when he began to voice his
government’s true concerns.
ALEX HOUSTON
Their concerns were about Alex Houston and his involvement with the CIA, drugs, money laundering, child
prostitution, and the big one he saved for last, slavery. No mention
of mind control was offered, although he did comment that Houston
was a "very bad man" and his crimes were "of the White
House". Disbelief was in order but not possible, due to the wide
array of "Eyes Only" stamped and initialed (official) CIA letterhead
and U.S. Government documents he slowly flashed before my eyes.
My first response to this "officer" was that Houston was too stupid
and crooked to be connected to U.S. "intelligence". This comment was
quickly countered with a gut wrenching photograph of Houston. He was
smiling a demonic grin while apparently having anal sex with a
small, very young, frightened Black boy. Later he was identified to
me as being Haitian.
When confronted with this horrific information and the apparent
validity of it, I asked, "What do you (your government) want me to
do?" He replied, "Get rid of him, distance yourself from him and all
of his associates".
I responded by asking him how he thought I could accomplish this
task. He stated, "Any way you choose". I told him that regardless of
what he had seen of American television concerning violence, the only
way I knew was to force him out by purchasing his company stock, and
I needed money to do it. He said, "Give us the figure and make the
arrangements. It is done."
I had returned to Tennessee with a Chinese government contract
for products valued at thirty-one million dollars. Stapled to it was
a telex letter of credit made out to me and the company from
Houston’s bank connection the New York branch of the now infamous
Bank of Credit and Commerce International (B.C.C.I.). The amount was
one million dollars in U.S. funds. The contract was worth
approximately ten million dollars in gross profit for Mr. Yoon and
me.
Given the charge by the Chinese to immediately discharge Houston of
his duties, I knew exactly what my plan of action would have to be.
Any other approach to resolving this problem could backfire and all
would be lost. And since a former, indirect employer of mine (when I
worked for Capital International Airways), the CIA, was implicated, I
knew one mistake and it could cost me my life. A comforting thought
prevailed and I reminded myself Houston was not only corrupt, but
stupid. The CIA must not have respected him either. Otherwise why
would he have had to go outside his circle of powerful perverts to
recruit me for an international business deal.
I drove to my office to begin the process of discovering something
Houston "must have done" that would breach the performance contract
he and I had signed when we started the company. Houston was out of
town supposedly doing one of his entertainment gigs, so I had
complete, unobstructed access to all files, his included. As I had
mentally predicted during the long flight from Hong Kong, the entire
ferreting process took about fifteen minutes. It seemed that Houston
and the old acquaintance who had introduced him to me were, as they
say, "selling out the back door". I collected the shipping bills
and, ironically enough, the bank deposit slip Houston had retained
when he cashed and deposited the customer’s check.
There was even a
letter copy where Houston had specifically instructed the customer not to discuss his
account with anyone at our company other than Houston himself or his
pervert friend, Ray Myers. Upon this discovery, I phoned the local
Korean lawyer (whose business card I had been given by Mr. Yoon
while in Hong Kong) to begin the stock transfer process. With
pleasure, I wrote Houston’s letter of resignation.
With this problem in the process of being resolved, I left the
office to visit an old, dear friend (now deceased) who had maintained
powerful U.S. and foreign intelligence connections. I needed answers
I could trust with my life. This "retired" Air Force General from the
Intelligence division would be my source.
The word "slavery" delivered in broken English by the Chinese
Intelligence officer shouted in my ears during the short drive to a
local hotel lobby, a comfortable place my "spook" pal selected for
us to talk in private. In the few short minutes of the drive, I had
my questions (for him) mentally noted. I wanted so much to gain the
most from our meeting.
The slavery word had triggered a dark
question in my mind, blocking other constructive thought, as I was
not comfortable with introducing the term mind control into
my presentation. I knew I could speak freely about anything to this
trusted friend. I wanted desperately to avoid the words mind
control, not for reasons of condemnation, but because they
represented a secret I had patriotically maintained for twenty
years.
After my arrival and the light chit chat of social niceties had been
exchanged between us, the air changed to one of seriousness. I
briefed him on my business involvement, and began a methodical line
of questions concerning the file the Chinese Intelligence officer
had presented on me and, especially, on Houston: shortly, my friend
interrupted me in mid-sentence, smiled a toothy grin, and said,
"Flash, you’re still the same, and you know damn well what I
mean." "Yes", I replied.
The spook was referring to a ’70s rock ballad titled "Still the
Same" by singer Bob Segar that was assigned to me years earlier by
mutual poker-playing buddies who identified with my passion for
successful risk-taking. I despised gambling. My passion was "risk
management" and poker gave me a recreational outlet for it. Although
my friends each paid dearly, they soon learned my poker strategy was
not so much "card counting" as it was my ability to read their body
language. This included the micro muscle spasm responses
around their eyes, Houston also lost to me at cards. The message the
General was implying, roughly translated, was that I was once again
"lucky as hell" to have survived my brief business relationship with
Alex Houston.
The discussion went down hill from that point directly into the
dreaded arena of mind control. After several minutes of listening to
details concerning a huge, invisible CIA slave trade going on world
wide, the talk became more regionalized to Tennessee. I learned that
Cathy and her little girl were victims of trauma-based mind control.
They were slaves and the "soul" property of my Uncle Sam. I learned
that everything I knew in theory and application about
external control of the mind was fully operational and encroaching
on the private sector of society. I was growing numb. The first words
out of my dry mouth were, "How would you spring these people out of
it?"
He smiled and said,
"I wouldn’t! What are you going to do with them
if
you did get them out?"
Before I could answer, he interrupted and
said, "Look,
you’re still the same, but nothing else is with Uncle. Now most of
the CIA,
FBI, and the MOB (Mafia) are the same, and they’re making their
moves on the
military."
I responded, "I already know that, but how do I save these two
people?"
He said,
"OK. Get the mother on the phone while her handler is gone.
Use the usual hang up code of dial and ring twice, hang up call back,
ring once, hang up and call back. Tell her you’re God, Give her a
biblical passage. They’re all Christian based programmed around
here."
Understanding that this procedure would gain Cathy’s full attention,
the General continued,
"She’ll do anything, and I mean
anything—except toast Houston—that you command her to do. Remember,
God commands. Find yourself a preacher who knows the Bible and get a
double-bind verse. You know what to do—for God ’s sake. And, listen,
if you do this, you’re on your own."
"Mark, this is nuts," he pleaded. Go to China and take them with
you. Forget about this Red, White and Blue cesspool. It’ll clean up.
There’s lots of good guys in the inside busting their asses to stop
this mess, but you’re not going to save the world."
I injected, "No, just my ass and a couple of people who Uncle
considers something other than human."
Then we briefly chatted about
some fine points of the rescue and how to legally stop Houston from
taking her back. I never saw this friend again.
Walking back to my car, I listened again in my mind to his haunting
words and my own life suddenly seemed like a scratched phonograph
record with the needle following the same groove over and over again.
The thoughts in my head were suddenly very unpatriotic - a far cry
from the feelings I had expressed in China concerning Mr. Yoon’s
involvement in shipping Chinese missiles to Libya.
Now I felt pure rage for what my country had become during the years
after I had bowed out of doing defense work. For once my own mind
seemed to be my worst enemy. Hatred for everything consumed me,
I loved what my country had once represented to me, but now I
was ashamed to be an American. And unbeknownst to me at the moment,
soon I would be ashamed of being a male, based on Cathy and Kelly’s
memories.
During the long, usually boring drive to my secluded house in
the wilderness southwest of Nashville, I distinctly recall
considering the inherent risks in the formula I was given for
"stealing" two slaves from under the coke- filled noses of the CIA.
My concerns were not of whether I could do it, but related to my
friend’s question of, "What are you going to do with them?"
My thoughts went blank as I muttered to myself, "Life is getting complicated again", I then consoled myself with the old adage of
"first things first".
Within a few days, I had played God and coordinated the move of
Cathy and her 8-year-old daughter, Kelly, out of Houston’s house
into a nearby apartment. All of this was totally unbeknownst to
Houston. As instructed, I had deliberately placed the powerful coded
suggestions into Cathy’s mind. These commands partially bridged her
own amnesic true perceptions that Alex was going to kill her.
Little did I know that the message I was provided to block Houston’s
former control of her was true.
Cathy and Kelly seemed to me to be very disoriented and somewhat
disconnected from reality. In their new, sparsely furnished kitchen,
I listened quietly to Cathy excitedly explain that "God had sent me"
to her. She "knew"
this was true because her hands seemed to automatically open her
King James version of the Holy Bible to Psalm, Chapter 37, verse 37,
which proclaims for the literal minded, "Mark, the perfect man".
Not only had I placed this biblical reference by a covert suggestion
in her mind while playing God on the phone, but just now in her home
moments earlier, I had broken the spine on her Bible so that it would
"magically" open to that page. She said, "See, God did it again for
you to see".
Using a deprogrammer’s language trick, I replied in a "reversed"
response, "Well, I’ll be damned. You are right. That’s the only
explanation left—that could explain all this", I was anxious to
change the subject so as not to risk alerting any one of her
observant personalities to my well contained laughter. I had been
warned that programmed slaves were hyper-observant.
In retrospect, I could not have had thoughts of being sacrilegious.
I was and remain deeply spiritual, but my earlier years of
researching religions for life’s answers had turned me cynical and
cold of man’s interpretation of the Bible, Koran and Buddha’s
teachings. This attitude I privately harbored towards organized
religions did nothing to squelch the dread I felt wash over me for
that moment.
In my attempt to change the subject from religion, I had remembered
the Nazi mind-control research performed under Himmler’s command on
the families of northern European multi-generational Satanists.
Christianity, particularly Catholicism, was Himmler’s pick of the
religions’ litter for targeting "Chosen Ones" for his hideous
mind-control experiments. These Chosen Ones were to be the robotic
leaders of Hitler’s New World Order. I then asked Cathy what
religion she was before she met Houston. She replied, "Mormon, but I
was a good Catholic before then".
My mind swirled from that shocking revelation. I again quickly
changed the subject and suggested we go out to dinner and discuss her
new job as my assistant starting the following the day. But tonight
we would discuss her divorce plans.
Later that evening, I began my search for a secure phone to find
someone from past associations I knew were CIA connected on an
officer’s level. I needed a get-well-quick formula or a clean mental
health referral who could help these two wide-eyed unfortunates. I
was informed there were none and that I knew more about "that mind
stuff" than anyone who would talk.
I returned home to find my phone ringing with an anxious Alex
Houston, who had returned from a "vacation" at Boys Town in Nebraska,
on the other end exclaiming that he was looking for his wife. She had
" disappeared".
I faked not knowing anything and suggested he come to my house the
next afternoon to go over some urgent business. The next morning, I
located a lawyer, for Cathy, and she had the divorce papers drawn
up.
That afternoon I had Granville Ratclift, a local Sheriff’s deputy I partially trusted, who occasionally watched my house when I was out
of town, waiting inside my house to witness and legally serve
Houston with the divorce papers and his termination notice from the
company. My last words to Houston which I recorded on tape were,
"You could get hurt if you mess with me or them. Alex, get out!"
(Now, I hope Houston lives to be a hundred years of age.)
Getting the legal jump on Houston to project Cathy reminded me that
I needed to attend to my own divorce needs. My wife mutually agreed
her life could be more emotionally rewarding without me. She moved to
Florida and
set up house with her mother. We filed for a no contested divorce. I
agreed to sell the house and what remained of our joint possessions.
Still unable to secure expert help for Cathy and Kelly, I maintained
their safety by moving them into my house until it was sold. It was
during this time that I was approached by a neighbor who said he had
seen someone through his binoculars wearing a gun and taking
pictures of my house. Other such intrusive visits by unknown persons
followed suit. I was getting real nervous.
I again called on a CIA operative I knew who worked within
Nashville’s corrupt law enforcement elite who, days later, informed
me to "get my ass out of there now - someone wanted me dead!" When I
asked why, he said, "You know damn good and well why!"
The house sold quickly and I had already decided to walk away from
my company, my contracts, and the one million dollars on deposit as a
letter of credit at B.C.C.I. in New York. Mr. Yoon came to
Nashville. He purchased Houston’s stock. I returned Mr. Yoon to the
airport. My last words to him were, "Farewell, friend". He knew
nothing of what was going on and I have never seen or spoken with
him again. That afternoon I cleaned out my office, handed the keys to
the landlord, closed out my personal and company bank accounts.
I had become angry beyond anything I had ever experienced. In
retrospect, this was the birthing process of evolution from man to
patriot.
I now only wanted answers to what was going on in my government. We
needed to be safe while I searched for these answers. My next stop
in this pursuit would be Las Vegas, Nevada, Once there, I met with
some powerful, underworld characters I had befriended back in my
aviation days at Capital International Airways while "packaging"
gambling junkets for these characters. I felt confident that these
guys would protect me at least until I could find out what and who
Cathy knew. I was reminded by these men that they were a part of the
CIA’s new funding operations. One of them flippantly remarked
while chomping his Cuban cigar, "You can’t hide an egg in a hen
house, fella".
My contact then coldly informed me that I had become involved in
something that affected our National Security. I lied to this "wise
guy" and cryptically responded, "Oh, well. I’ll take them (Cathy and
Kelly) to Alaska and play like a voiceless chameleon". In
retrospect, this spontaneous lie must have worked to protect me from
"red shining" myself to become the recipient of a CIA/MOB hit.
Cathy and I continued to stay "parked" in Las Vegas for a few more
days waiting to retrieve Kelly from a last minute (suspected CIA)
court ordered visit with her biological father, Wayne Cox. Later, I
would learn from Kelly’s medical reports that she had spent
Christmas vacation "in hell."
I was now alone in my mind, scared, and going broke fast. Once again
I felt totally alienated from everything and everybody in my life.
At this moment, I began constantly reminding myself that I was doing
the only thing I knew for sure was right. Realistically, I was
astride the proverbial tiger and I could not get off its back and
survive.
3 1991 Roman Catholic Weekly
Back to
Contents
|