| 
	  
	  
	  
	  
	
	
	
	Mission Possibleby  
	Betty Martini
 
	from
	
	Copi 
	Website 
		
			
			Article 1267 of 
			alt.support.diet:Path: 
			castle.nando.net!news.sprintlink.net!southwind.net!symbios.com!csn!nntp-xfer-2.csn.net!csn!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews
 From: Steve Jackson
 Newsgroups: alt.support.diet
 Subject: 
			NutraSweet Article 6
 Date: Sun, 17 Dec 1995 17:17:37 GMT
 Organization: Netcom
 Lines: 174
 Message-ID: 
			<4b1jcc$hd0@cloner3.netcom.com>
 NNTP-Posting-Host: 
			irv-ca8-07.ix.netcom.com
 X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
 
	You say toxicity is a matter of 
	degree. When NutraSweet was in 600 products there was great concern for 
	safety and hearings in Washington on its deadly affects. 
	 
	  
	It is quoted in one 
	book where Senator Metzenbaum said: 
	 
		
		"You would think people would be 
	dropping like flies, but they aren’t." 
	 
	Yes, they are. But its called the 
	"hidden epidemic" because no one associated all the neurological symptoms 
	and diseases, and the endocrine disorders, and cancers with NutraSweet. 
	Searle and Monsanto have funded so many organizations that even the 
	physicians at the American College of Physicians didn’t know until I 
	provided them with some of the documents and case histories. They were 
	aghast and one replied "we’re recommending the very thing that is making our 
	patients sick".
 Going back to to toxicity. Today NutraSweet is in 5000 products and 
	climbing, not 600, and the patent has expired. Like one professor said: "Why 
	are people saying they are going blind on coffee?" Well, they are putting 
	Equal in it. Now Maxwell House is putting it in their vanilla roast which 
	goes in a coffee maker - double whammy.
 
 Consider that NutraSweet is in coffee, juice, vitamins and several products 
	you have for breakfast. Then people drink diet soda. It’s in their baked 
	goods, many times, without their knowing it. It’s in their medicines and 
	even over the counter medicines. Even your gum is "sugar free".
 
 At one of those safety meetings the late FDA toxicologist, Dr. Adrian Gross 
	said:
 
		
		"In view of all these 
		indications that the cancer causing potential of 
	Aspartame  
		is a matter that had been established way beyond any reasonable doubt, 
		one can ask: what is the reason for the apparent refusal by the FDA to 
		invoke for this food additive the so-called Delaney Amendment to the 
		Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act Is it not clear beyond any shadow of a doubt 
		that Aspartame  
		had caused brain tumors or brain cancer in animals, and is this not 
		sufficient to satisfy the provisions of that particular section of the 
		law?  
	
		 
		  
		Given that this is so (and I cannot see any kind of tenable 
		argument opposing the view that Aspartame  
		causes cancer) how would the FDA justify its position that it views 
		certain amount of Aspartame  as 
		constituting an ADI (Allowable Daily Intake) or ’safe" level of it? Is 
		that position in effect not equivalent to setting a ’tolerance’ for this 
		food additive and thus a violation of that law? AND IF THE FDA ITSELF 
		ELECTS TO VIOLATE THE LAW WHO IS LEFT TO PROTECT THE HEALTH OF THE 
		PUBLIC?" 
	Obviously, we have no protector. 
	One of the women who testified before Congress was Joyce Wilson. Again, she 
	did not associate her medical problem with NutraSweet until someone as blunt 
	as I am got on TV and said "this is poison - I’m already blind in one eye". 
	
	 
	  
	Joyce said: 
		
			
			"That's me - it must be 
			the NutraSweet". 
			
		 
	Because she knew what was doing 
	it she could tell her doctor and Dr. Morgan Raiford, highly respected 
	ophthalmologist, saw the methanol toxicity, and medically documented her 
	case.
 But Joyce had used it too long and with her last breathe she tried to warn 
	the world like I’m doing. In April, 1994 her husband Richard wrote this 
	message in a local newspaper:
 
		
		"Aspartame killed my wife. No words can express the agony and horror sweet 
		Joyce 
		endured. This poison destroyed her brain, ravaged all her organs and 
		blinded her. She died at age 46 in 1991. 
		  
		When we filed suit we 
		were harassed and threatened. Our gung-ho attorneys with a medically 
		documented case suddenly seemed scared away. The case had to be dropped. 
		Joyce deteriorated so quickly she would not have been able to 
		participate in the legal proceedings anyway.
 Don’t listen to the 
		paid Judas-goats and TV celebrities who say its safe. Save your life and 
		those you love, and avoid the grief I endured. The makers of this poison 
		considered her death an acceptable cost of business. I’m a man without a 
		wife because the NutraSweet Company is a business without a 
		conscience. 
		April is anti-Aspartame  
		month. Take dead serious the warnings you will hear.
 
		  
		The life you save 
		may be your own.  
		Richard Wilson." 
	The last week in September Joyce 
	Wilson’s son married and on her empty chair lay a long stem rose. On October 
	1 MISSION POSSIBLE exposed the American Diabetic Assn. for 
	taking megabucks 
	from 
	Monsanto and endorsing this products for diabetics with full knowledge 
	of its deadly effects. Press packs were covered with black lace and sympathy 
	cards and garnished with one long stem rose.
 Mission Possible volunteers walked along side almost 1000 diabetics in black 
	berets representing mourning and outcry for those sick and dying from Aspartame 
	. They were given a position paper on Aspartame  and 
	diabetes written Dr. H. J. Roberts, diabetic specialist, who had given 
	research to the ADA who refused to print it. They were also given our 
	warning flyer.
 
 Diabetics started getting off of NutraSweet and they began to call saying 
	how their vision was returning, their memory was returning, their depression 
	was gone and their blood sugar was under control. One lady met me on the 
	street and hugged me:
 
		
			
			"How could they do this 
			to us. I was so sick for so long. I could have died." 
	Joyce Wilson will never know her 
	grandchildren. She died like an Alzheimer patient with no memory, the most 
	common symptom of NutraSweet. Dr. Roberts says that aspartic acid and
	phenylalaine cannot be tolerated by the brain in large amounts without the 
	other amino acids in protein.
 When NutraSweet was approved Dr. Roberts being a diabetic specialist 
	immediately noticed the memory loss, confusion and severe vision loss of his 
	diabetic patients.
 
 The Congressional Record that contains the protest of the National Soft 
	Drink Assn. admits Searle used the wrong test that would not even pick up 
	aspartic acid, the wrong solution (buffered solution instead of beverage 
	matrix), did not test for temperature elevation and did not test for the 
	witches brew of breakdown products.
 
	  
	Books say that "someone" told the 
	Board 
	of Inquiry the FDA convened "not to get into carbonated beverages". 
	Dr. 
	Arthur Hull Hayes, head of the FDA over-ruled the Board of Inquiry that said 
	not to approve NutraSweet because of the brain tumors and seizures. He then 
	went to work for Searle’s PR firm and didn’t speak to the press for 10 
	years.
 Because we deal with this daily and see the symptoms over and over and over 
	again, we have it down to a science. We just say "take the no Aspartame  
	test". They are startled to see their symptoms disappear in a matter of 
	weeks as they return to normal health - at least the ones you get in time.
 
 On June 2, I hand-carried to Newt Gingrich a letter from Dr. Roberts that 
	said:
 
		
		"I am writing you to request 
		a new Congressional hearing in the near future concerning the documented 
		harm being inflicted on many Americans, probably in the millions, from 
		the use of products containing Aspartame  
		(NutraSweet). .....
 These asserts do not stem from personal gain 
		or bias, but rather reflect extreme concern over damage being caused by 
		a chemical that should not have been approved by the FDA in the first 
		place. Other professionals and scientists who shared this view include 
		in-house FDA scientists, consultants for the General Accounting Office 
		and a Public Board of Inquiry...
 
 ..The severity of their 
		neurological, intellectual, psychiatric, metabolic, endocrine, allergic 
		and other reactions to Aspartame  
		products forces me to recommend that products containing this synthetic 
		chemical supplement be removed as an "imminent public health hazard."
 
	Believe it - its poison. And 
	I’ll be glad to email you the report on 
	Aspartame 
	’s history emailed to me if you want to see really how bad it is.
 Do you really think 1 million people would make distributing warning flyers 
	a way of life if the health of the world was not at stake.
 
	  
	We’re getting 
	calls from other countries having the same problems. I just sent a packet to Norway. A man who distributes them in Moscow is coming to 
	Dr. Roberts 
	seminar here in Atlanta, July 29 on Alzheimer's. We are the hush heard around 
	the world - poison - poison - poison! We all give out the documentation at 
	our expense. It takes up all our time and thousands and thousands of dollars 
	to make copies and mail them.
 Some people want to know, others don’t care. We’re trying to save those who 
	want to be saved. If you talk to 5 people using NutraSweet 3 of them already 
	have the symptoms or some disease triggered by Aspartame  
	according to the 
	Aspartame  
	Consumer Safety Network. I find that to be the case.
 
	  
	The documentation cost 
	you nothing but the postage on an envelope. It’s available if you want it. 
	 
	   |