| 
			 
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			
			DIPLOMACY BY DECEPTION 
			
			
			 
			
			  
			
			11 -
			Apartheid And India's Caste System  
			
			 
			Much has been made by the Committee of 300 about the "evils" of 
			South Africa's separation of races policy. Yet, little or nothing 
			has been said about India's rigid separation of classes in Indian 
			society. Could it be that South Africa is attacked because it has 
			the richest gold fields in the world, while India has only a few 
			natural resources of any real worth?  
			 
			Actively assisted by master deceiver Cecil John Rhodes, a servant of 
			the Rothschild, began an agitation for "rights" was raised by the 
			carpetbaggers and hordes of foreigners who flocked to the Transvaal 
			when the discovery of gold was announced. What these vagabonds and 
			fortune hunters demanded was the right to vote, the first of the 
			"one man one vote" scams used to separate the Boer people and their 
			descendants from their national sovereignty. The agitation was or
			chestrated by the Rothschild-Rhodes political machine in 
			Johannesburg and carefully controlled by Lord Alfred Milner out of 
			London.  
			 
			It was obvious to the Boer leaders that by allowing the newcomers to 
			vote, their government would be swept aside by the hordes of foreign 
			adventurers who had descended upon them. When it became clear that 
			the Boer leaders were not going to meekly allow their people to 
			become disenfranchised by the political demands for "one man one 
			vote, plans for war, which had been a year in the making while Queen 
			Victoria's ministers and emissaries talked peace, burst on the 
			scene.  
			 
			Queen Victoria sent the mightiest army ever assembled up to that 
			time to do battle with the tiny Boer Republics. It would take the 
			most vivid imagination to believe that the Queen of England was 
			concerned about non-voting rights for the fortune hunters and 
			carpet-baggers swarming over the Boer republics. After three years 
			of the most brutal conflict during which the British showed no mercy 
			for Boer women and children, 25,000 of whom perished in the first 
			concentration camps ever to be established.  
			
			  
			
			The Boers, largely 
			undefeated on the battlefield were obliged to come to the conference 
			table. At Vereeniging, where the conference was held, in an 
			elaborate piece of deception, the Boers were stripped of everything 
			that they stood for, including the vast riches that lay beneath the 
			barren soil of their republics.  
			 
			It is important to remember that the Boers were a devout Christian 
			nation. Queen Victoria's Illuminati-Gnostic-Cathari-Bogomil 
			ministers and counselors were determined not only to defeat the 
			Boers militarily, and take over the mineral wealth of their 
			republics, but to crush them and wipe out their language and 
			culture. Chief architect of this criminal enterprise was the 
			haughty, aristocratic Lord Alfred Milner, who in 1915 financed the 
			Bolsheviks and made possible the "Russian" revolution. The British 
			banished Paul Kruger, the venerable State President of the 
			Transvaal along with most of his ministers and those who had led the 
			armed struggle against British imperialism. This was the first 
			recorded instance of such barbaric treatment carried out by a 
			supposedly civilized nation.  
			 
			The reason why blatant, rampant apartheid was, and still is, allowed 
			to flourish in India, is because India is the home of the New Age 
			religion, which is favored by the Black Nobility of Venice and the 
			oligarchists of Britain. The New Age religion is squarely based on 
			the Hindu religion. Theosophist high-priestess Annie Besant, is 
			credited with having adapted the Hindu religion to New Age ideas 
			after going to India in 1898.  
			 
			The idea of "one man, one vote," in which apartheid is cast as the 
			villain, has no place in United States history. It was merely a ruse 
			to convince the world that the United Nations was concerned about 
			the welfare of the South African black tribes. (The blacks are 
			divided into 17 tribes and are not a homogeneous nation of united 
			people.) The anti-apartheid clamor was raised to cover the real 
			goal, that being to seize full control of South Africa's vast 
			mineral riches, which will now pass to the Committee of 300. Mandela 
			will be cast aside as a worn out tool which has served its purpose, 
			when this has been accomplished.  
			 
			The U.S. Constitution does not provide for "one man, one vote" an 
			observation that may be lost in the shouting over the "evil of South 
			Africa's apartheid" as Mandela likes to call it Representation in 
			the 
			U.S. Congress is determined by population counts taken by the Census 
			Bureau in given areas once every ten years, and not on the basis of 
			"one man one vote." That is why there is widespread gerrymandering of 
			boundaries every four years. It is the number of people within these 
			boundaries who then choose their representative.  
			 
			It may be that liberal politicians desire a black or Hispanic 
			representative for a given area; one they hope will vote with them 
			on their liberal agenda. But their may not be enough black or 
			Hispanic voters in the area to make the necessary change, so liberal 
			politicians will try to get boundaries altered, even by the 
			ridiculous subterfuge of linking two areas separated by as much as 
			100 miles through a narrow corridor between the two areas. The idea 
			is that if blacks or Hispanics in the targeted area are in a 
			minority, then create a majority by linking two areas, who will 
			elect a black or Hispanic representative beholden to the liberals in 
			the House and Senate.  
			 
			All during the clamor over apartheid the British press took good 
			care to conceal a far greater apartheid which preceded South Africa 
			by hundreds of years: the Indian caste system which remains in place 
			to this very day and is still rigidly enforced.  
			 
			Beginning with the British incursion into India in 1582, the Sufis 
			were used to split the Moslems and Sikhs and set them against each 
			other. In 1603, John Mildenhall arrived in Agra seeking concessions 
			for the English East India Company, founded in London on Dec. 
			31,1600. The company changed its name to the British East India 
			Company, and used its agents to break the power of the Sikhs, who 
			opposed the caste system, In 1717, BEIC bribery and deceptive 
			diplomacy and gifts of medical supplies were enough to secure vast 
			concessions from the Moguls, who also exempted the BEIC from 
			taxation on revenues derived from poppy-growing and raw opium 
			making.  
			 
			By 1765, Clive of India, a legendary figure in the British 
			occupation of India had taken full control of the richest poppy 
			fields in the world in 
			Bengal, Benares and Bihar, exercising control of the collection of 
			revenues from the Moguls. By 1785, the opium trade was firmly in the 
			grip of the BEIC under Sir Warren Hastings. One of Hastings's Indian 
			"reforms" was to secure all poppy-growing lands and bring them under 
			his control. This included the making of raw opium.  
			 
			The British crown extended the BEIC charter for another 30 years 
			after representations were made in Parliament in 1813. In 1833 
			Parliament again extended BEIC's charter for another 20 years. 
			Seeing power slipping from their grasp, the Indian upper caste began 
			to rebel against British rule through the BEIC. To forestall this, 
			the British prime minister deceived Indian leaders by having the 
			Government of India Act passed on August 2,1856. The Act ostensibly 
			transferred all BEIC assets and lands in India to the British crown. 
			This diplomatic move was pure diplomacy by deception, because in 
			essence, nothing had changed. BEIC was the Crown.  
			 
			Prime Minister Disraeli carried the deception a step further when in 
			1896, athis instigation, parliament declared Queen Victoria "Empress 
			of India." In the same year, famine killed more than 2 million 
			lowercaste Indians. Altogether, during British (BEIC) rule, more 
			than 6 million lower-caste Indians died of famine. Nothing remotely 
			resembling this disaster ever occurred in South Africa. In the 
			CIA-instigated "Sharpeville" riots, there was world-wide uproar and 
			condemnation of South Africa, when less than 80 black rioters were 
			killed by security forces. The blacks were incited to riot by 
			outside forces, not realizing that they were being used.  
			 
			The "Jati" caste system operating in India is based 100 percent on 
			race. At the top of the pyramid are the Aryans (white with blue 
			eyes, believed to be the descendants of Alexander the Greaf s 
			occupation of the country.) Directly under them are the Brahmins in 
			varying shades of white to light brown. Brahmin priests are drawn 
			from this caste. Below the Brahmins come the warriors and rulers, 
			called Kshatriyas, who are also very light-skinned. Below the 
			Kshatriyas are the Vaisyas class, consisting of minor officials, 
			merchants, traders, craftsmen and skilled workers. They have darker 
			skins.  
			 
			Then come the Sudras or unskilled workers, those who don't have a 
			plumbing, electrical, auto mechanic or other trade. Then, at the 
			very broad base of the power pyramid come the "Harijans," literally 
			meaning "outcasts," collectively known as "Pariahs." They are also 
			known as "untouchables", and they have very dark to black skins.  
			
			  
			
			The 
			blacker their skins, the less "touchable" they are. In 1946 Lord 
			Louis Mountbatten (Battenburg) directly representing the Committee 
			of 300, offered India full independence, a subterfuge to quell 
			serious rioting over continued famine that took the livers of 
			hundreds of thousands of Harijans. This was largely ignored by the 
			Western press. As a further empty gesture, "untouchability" was 
			declared illegal one year later, but the practice continued as 
			though the law had never been passed.  
			 
			"Untouchability" was the most cruel of all of India's rigid caste 
			system. It meant that the Harijans were not allowed to ever touch 
			those in other castes above them, even by accident Should this 
			happen, then the upper class person so offended, had the right to 
			have the Harijan offender killed. The system of rigid separation was 
			not only a class measure, but was also to prevent the spread of 
			diseases rampant among the Harijans.  
			 
			The Harijans are the largest racial group in India, and for 
			centuries they have been shockingly mistreated and abused. When 
			political changes are desired, this group provides the canon fodder, 
			their lives considered of little or no value. We saw a demonstration 
			of this when the Harijans were used to destroy an ancient Moslem 
			mosque in India to bring about political changes in the Indian 
			government This evil is seldom if ever mentioned in the Western 
			press or any television programming.  
			 
			Unfortunately for the blacks, they are but pawns in a game. Their 
			importance will end once the Committee of 300 has achieved its goal 
			and Mandela is cast aside like a worn out tool that has served its 
			purpose. The Global 2000 population reduction program will then be 
			applied to them in earnest.  
			
			  
			
			They deserve a better fate than the one 
			planned for them by Mandela's controllers; the Oppenheimers and the 
			Committee of 300.  
			
			  
			
			
			
			Back to Contents 
			
			  
			 |