The
Secret Gold Treaty
PART 4.2
DEFROCKING
THE SECRET TREATY
Exciting
as Tom's revelations were, I still needed to make sense of the underlying
structure that appeared to govern this mountain of gold still hidden in
Southeast Asia.
The
answer to this enigma appears to reside in a secret
meeting held in 1972 in which 48 nations (or representatives
from 48 nations) participated that formalised an earlier
informal agreement (dare I say a "Secret Treaty?") to
control and "use" the metal plundered during World War
II. By all accounts,
bullion banks, central banks, and also refineries have
since joined in this arrangement and have formed an
unofficial "club" to police and control the black gold
that they henceforward designated as being on "vacation."
This appears to imply that gold plundered during World
War II, whether it is kept in bank vaults beneath Zurich
Airport or concealed in burial sites in the Philippines
or Indonesia makes little real difference to those who
are pulling the strings. In any event this ratification remains "unofficial."
The
secret 1972 meeting occurred just one year after President Nixon closed
the gold window and one year before the Trilateral Commission was founded
-- an event that resulted in the integration of Japan into the Western
fold. As we have seen from previous
pages, a number of reports indicate that the Trilateral Commission is a
large mover and shaker in the world of black gold.
According
to information I have received, almost all of the gold plundered by Japan's
Golden Lily came from official state reserves (see images on this page)
and thus the exact amounts plundered were obviously known and clearly hallmarked
-- one reason Ferdinand Marcos hired Bob Curtis to alter the metal’s "fingerprint"
of the gold Marcos had recovered and Marcos insisted that "his" metal should
not be offered for sale on any of the world’s seven official bullion markets.
Yet
one has to ask why these gold reserves -- which have been known about by
senior officials and bankers in the US and in Europe, at least since 1945
-- have been allowed to remain in situ rather than being returned
to the dozen or so Southeast Asian nations to which they rightfully belong. In
keeping the existence of this plunder a secret and not permitting its integration
in the official global banking and financial system appears, on the face
of it, to be little more than a contravention of international law, somewhat
akin to piracy, doesn’t it?
But
that is not all. Those individuals
and groups that today are legitimately working to privately recover (under
existing laws governing "treasure troves") gold and other treasure stashed
in the Philippines and elsewhere by the Golden Lily cannot dispose of the
assets they have recovered without going through the banking system; apart,
that is, from comparatively small deals that occasionally take place between
private parties.
Moreover,
it has been suggested by one knowledgeable source that the money earned
by private treasure hunters who are directed through this labyrinth is
a fraction of the current value of the metal they recover -- a fact that
is corroborated by Sukarno's trustee. The
powers that be have decreed that the found metal is nevertheless not theirs
to dispose of as they please -- despite the fact that they have legally
recovered it and legitimately own it. Instead
it "belongs" to an unofficial and immensely powerful "club" the members
of which rigorously control distribution for their own ends -- whatever
they may be. Clearly, this is a case
of the arrogance of might and muscle stamping international law to a pulp.
It
also seems that a mechanism is in place governing the movement of this
metal. The gold and platinum that
are permitted to enter the banking system are indirectly and unobtrusively
"vectored" through cut-outs until they reach -- so I am informed -- an
arm's-length associate firm of the Union Bank of Switzerland. This
firm, in turn, is said to operate on behalf of an un-named American entity
that is believed to be the Federal Reserve. This
arrangement and line of access exactly parallels the transactional guidelines
given to Peter Johnston by Dr. Damanik.
When
I say "enter the banking system," this does not necessarily mean physical
movement. Indeed, as we have seen
with the Sukarno revelations, large quantities of bullion remain immobile
in the jungles of Indonesia. A great
deal also remains untouched and still buried in the Philippines.
Physical
accessibility is not necessary or, perhaps, even desirable for the powers
that be. If the gold cannot be moved
except with their express permission, it is for all intents and purposes
little different from bullion that is locked and guarded in a bank vault
-- where change of ownership is customarily effected by book transfer and/or
the exchange of paper certificates denoting ownership.
We
have also seen from some accounts that this metal can
be utilised -- perhaps hypothecated -- as an asset to
generate funding for a variety of purposes, including,
it appears, America's NASA projects and certain projects
on behalf of the British crown. Another
source has indicated the involvement of this gold in
the construction of sophisticated weapon systems, including
ICBMs during the Cold War. It
is impossible to corroborate these claims but, if true,
such usage would certainly have been protected by state
secrecy, I imagine. Moreover, according to documents Peter Johnston provided, some metal
has been leased to sovereign nations on a long-term
basis -- even though the borrower must have known that
the gold was both legally and technically "stolen."
Meanwhile, there are almost certainly numerous other
projects for which this plunder has acted as collateral.
That
these arrangements (the Secret Treaty) remain secret and unofficial means
they are unaccountable and are thus absent of any scrutiny by democratically
elected officials and, more worrying, the public at large. It
is not even known for certain that those who act on behalf of sovereign
nations in this respect have done so with the consent of their own democratic
institutions. One cannot help but
ask if each and every president since 1945 was made aware of this deepest
secret. We do know as a matter of
historical fact that Allen Dulles did not shirk from betraying his president
and country. His loyalties lay first
and foremost with an international group of powerful businessmen.
That
being the case, is it not possible to suggest that this is a secret kept
by a fairly small and tight club for their own ends -- and if you're not
one of them (to use Margaret Thatcher's terminology "is he one of us?")
you are kept out of the charmed circle? And if these are valid questions
to ask, then is it possible to identify who "they" might be?
As
we have already seen two elite and interlocked groups -- the Trilateral
Commission and the Bilderberg group -- have their fingerprints all over
this story. Might their aim be to
slowly and stealthily engineer the world into whatever image and shape
they wish? Colonel Fletcher Prouty,
in his excellent book, JFK, chills his readers with what he believes
the scenario of this elite is: war for profit, genocide to depopulate the
world to what are regarded as manageable levels and, ultimately, the introduction
of mechanisms aimed at social control. If
democratically elected leaders such as JFK get in the way of the elite’s
plans, they are terminated. In outlining
this frightening scene, Prouty also argues that the Cold War was, to some
extent anyway, a charade, since members of Russia’s own elite had gone
along with this programme since at least 1972. Clearly,
having access to almost unimaginable sums of money confers a degree of
power that is almost beyond dream. One
knowledgeable former Swiss banker says that the members of the "club" who
control access to these assets already have plans to go "global."
Even
today, secrecy remains at the heart of this decades old intrigue and I
do not think it an over-statement to regard this story as the biggest secret
of them all. What little I truly
know of the dispensation of power and the perennial behind-the-scenes scheming
by unelected, unaccountable members of a shadowy cabal fills me with no
confidence that they will, or plan, to, do the right thing for the majority
of us. What is known of their modus
operandi points to a creed of self-righteous greed and an appalling
absence of morality that to most of us would chill the marrow. One
can easily imagine they see themselves as the modern gods of Olympus cruelly
toying with mankind even as they lazily drop a grape into their mouths
or sip a goblet of wine.
If
I had not had the assistance of Peter Johnston in providing
me with his bulging files four and half years ago, this
story would not have been told. It
is fitting, therefore, that the last words of this Dossier
call for Peter's besmirched name to be cleared. Peter,
at all times, WAS empowered with legally binding
authority to dispose of the assets legally controlled
by Dr. Damanik. Peter
had no way of knowing that a secret cabal with immense
power would be threatened by his efforts to dispose
of these assets. His
arrest, trial and imprisonment constitute a blatant
miscarriage of justice that, at the very least, emanated
from the Union Bank of Switzerland, which, in turn,
was aided and abetted by the Bank of England. Others
stood idly by, thus compounding his wrongful imprisonment.
ENDS
Back
to Contents page
Next
Page (Appendix1)
|