|
March 29, 1997
Freddie, Terry, Jan, Ark, Laura
Q: Hello
A: Hello
Q: And what name shall we use this evening?
A: Sannorri
Q: And where are we transmitting from?
A: We do not know where “you” are transmitting from, but we are
translating the
density communicators through that locator you know as Cassiopaea!!
Q: (Terry) Does that mean we are talking to the Cassies, or are we
talking to someone else? They never did like that before!
A:
Variety is the spice of life.
Q: (Laura) Well, we have a variety, we have a new person! We’re
allowed to do it, so can they, I guess!
A: Yes.
Q: (Laura) All right, now, let me get my questions. The first
question I want to ask tonight is about SB who has been
corresponding back and forth with Ark... OK, what is the source of
the funding behind them?
A: We know this, but, any guesses?
Q: (Laura) OK, they want us to play 20 questions. Do we have any
guesses?
A: Ask Lindemann.
Q: (Laura) Well, we know who’s behind it now... Rockefeller! So
we’re talking Rockybucks and his bunch.
A: Are we? Or, is that unsubstantiated rumor?
Q: (Laura) Well, yes, it could be unsubstantiated rumor, we don’t
know that it’s the Rockefellers behind Lindemann. OK, let me ask
this. Is it the United States government?
A: There is no such.
Q: (Laura) Well, let me try this another way. Is this SB a
legitimate source of funding for...
A: It is “legitimate,” as it can indeed provide unlimited funds.
But, the real
question is: Do you want to take advantage?
Q: (Jan) What is the price tag attached?
A:
Depends upon results of experimentation.
Q: (Laura) No, I asked what’s the price tag? Does it depend upon the
results of our experimentation, or theirs?
A: Ours.
Q: (Laura) Yes.
A: If you discover something truly “earthshaking,” well...
Q: (Laura) In other words, if we discover something truly
earthshaking, the price might be very high. Is that it?
A:
Maybe. Or, you could be sequestered.
Q: (Terry) In other words, put out, taken away... caged and used!
(Ark) Anybody can be sequestered away from what is necessary...
A: It is possibility.
[Checked gauss meter - didn’t seem to be registering, and was
adjusted]
Q: (Laura) OK, do you have any other comments to make
about SB? What did they say now, that maybe the same funding as
Lindemann was behind them also. How about, what would you call it...
the Quorum. Is the Quorum behind it?
A: Yes.
Q:
(Laura) OK, is the Quorum the group we’re supposed to be looking
for?
(Terry) We have to go back and ask about the Quorum. We’ve got so
many characters, it’s worse than X-Files!
A: No, more interesting.
Q: (Terry) Yes, it is, definitely!
A: World banking conglomerate.
Q: (Terry) World bank.
(Laura) I do not wish to be ‘owned’ in that
way...
A: Not easy to avoid.
Q: (Laura) Well, I know it’s not easy to avoid.
A: Will become even more difficult soon.
Q:
(Laura) Well, they didn’t say impossible... they just said
difficult. But, on the other hand, I don’t know if I want to do more
difficult... well, we’ve got so much difficult...
(Terry) ...That
it’s easy now!
A: Many interesting things to happen.
Q: (Laura) To happen? Where, when, how, why, and to whom?
A: You. And everyone else in your realm... Expect revelations.
Q: (Laura) All right. Well. Ark has to get on a plane the week after
next...
A: Not long in Poland.
Q: (Laura) Why?
A: Circumstances intervene. Has been a change in positions at
University... Some
interesting developments with regard to marriage.
Q: (Laura) When you say interesting, do you mean interesting in the
sense of positive and less stressful?
A: Both.
Q: (Laura) Both? OK, not going to worry about that. The next big
question is...
A: Mean both positive and negative.
Q: (Laura) Both positive and negative! Wonderful! On to the next
question. We would like to know why there was such an upsurge in the
number of visitors to the Web page?
A: Because of current events.
Q: (Laura) Do you mean current events as in the suicides of all the
people over the Hale Bopp thing?
A: Yes.
Q:
(Laura) And what was the initiating reason for them to come to
that particular Web page? They did some sort of a Web page search,
and what did they find, I mean, what was the key?
A: Varied.
Q: (Laura) OK, on the former occasion when (name) brought this
little gadget [The gauss meter] to the Library and it was dancing
around all over the place, can you tell me why [Gauss meter moves at
this point.] it was moving so vigorously at that particular time,
and yet is moving only a little bit now?
A: Em wave can be refracted by surroundings.
Q: (Laura) OK, can you make this needle move, at the present time,
upon request?
To any extent at all?
A: No. Wave makes needle move, not us.
Q: (Laura) OK, and what makes the wave? What is the source of the
wave, the EM, if it’s not you?
[The placement of the gauss meter was adjusted to touch the edge of
the board]
A: EM wave is side effect of channeling process.
Q: (Laura) OK, let me ask this question. In talking about time, I
would like to ask, in relation to time, what is memory?
A:
More specific.
Q: (Laura) You want me to be more specific, well, let me put it this
way. Some understanding of time refers to it as the ‘now’, the
ever-present now. Well, a lot of people remember a lot of other ‘nows,’
some people don’t remember any ‘nows’ at all, and it seems like
memory is almost like a reverse function of anticipation.
Anticipation being almost like a memory of the ‘future’ and memory
being like a reverse anticipation into the past. So, what I would
like to know is if time is merely a ‘now’, what is memory?
A:
Conscious and subconscious record of perceptions.
Q: (Laura) Ok. If memory is subconscious or conscious recording of
perceptions,
when one accumulates a sufficient amount of memory, does one then
become
‘timeless’?
A: One is always timeless.
Q: (Laura) OK, but does one then become aware of one’s timelessness?
A: In 4th density.
Q: (Laura) OK. Does an electron have a memory?
A: Electron is borrowed unit of 7th density.
Q: (Laura) All right, in the picture of the crop circle you
designated as being ‘Atomic Structure’, there was the concentric
circles and then these three things on the outside corners of the
triangle, one being zigzag, one being plain and round, and the other
one kind of like a wheel, it had like little divisions. Would the
zig-zaggy one be the electron?
A: Not correct concept atomic structure unifies elemental atoms.
Q: (Laura) What is an elemental atom, as opposed to an ordinary
atom?
A: Elemental defines singular body of structure. Within, as in:
“element of.”
Electron is element of atomic structure.
Q: (Laura) Is there anything about an atom that holds memory?
A: Memory is subjective, atom is not.
Q:
(Laura) Well, some atoms seem to be somewhat subjective.
A: No, it is your interpretation.
Q: (Laura) There was a call here to the house from the New York
Times, supposedly somebody who was from the New York Times, I would
like to know, why this person called?
A: Wanted your “spin” on “Heaven’s Gate.”
Q: (Terry) Are there going to be repercussions throughout the, how
shall I put this, the community of people, even though they are not
related to this, who are doing things like this, over this Heavens
Gate, Solar Temple mess?
A: Temporary.
Q: (Terry) Until they find something else to latch onto.
(Laura)
That’s right.
(Jan) This week’s ‘mind candy.’ (Laura) Exactly. That’s a good term
for it.
Anything that we need to know that I haven’t asked? That I ought to
have asked? That I would like you to consider as having been asked?
(Terry) That’s a good way to put it!
(Laura) Anything that you wish
to convey to us, consider the question asked!
A: Energies at your Gainesville locator.
Q: (Terry) What about the energies there?
A:
Negative.
Q: (Laura) Yes, it’s pretty and all, but...
A: No. The house!
Q: (Terry) What’s causing the negative energy at this house?
A: Poltergeist.
Q: (Laura) Will we be all right for the little time we have left?
A: Maybe.
Q: (Ark) Yes, but the last time we asked about that, they said that
it was an old cemetery, but that it was not important.
(Jan) Ask if
that has changed.
A: Yes. Beware of possible leg fracture.
Q: (Laura) For who?
A: Laura.
Q: (Laura) Well, obviously, it’s not going to be you, Ark! I’m the
one that’s always falling! So, it’s obviously a good idea for me to
go and stay in the office all day long.
A: It is a good idea for you to watch yourself!!
Q: (Jan) Carry around a mirror!
(Laura) That’s a good one!
(Jan) I’m
trying to stay awake here! Sorry about that.
(Terry) Anything at all
you would like to impart to us this evening?
A: No. Goodbye.
End of Session
Back to Contents
April 4, 1997
Freddie, Alice, Tom F, Cherie, Tom H, Ark, Laura
Q: Hello.
A: Hello.
Q: And what name shall we use this evening?
A: Marra.
Q: And where are you transmitting from?
A: Cassiopaea.
Q: My first question is: If memory is conscious and subconscious
record of perception, as you have stated, and there occurs a
“reality merge,” as you also described previously, some sort of time
manipulation, does this automatically change individual perceptions?
A: Perceptions “leap” into place according to markers in the
eternally present
continuum.
Q: What are these markers?
A: Experiential breaks in the perceptual realm of continuance.
Q: Markers are experiential breaks. So, one experiences breaks and
they become markers... perceptions leap into place... is this saying
that, when there is a perception of a break, that some part of the
psyche seeks to bridge this break by leaping into some sort of ...
A: The definition of the previous responses will become clear for
you only after
some reflection, my dear!
Q: Umm... does this leaping of perception occur for everyone as a
group, or are some people immune to it?
A: !Como!?! What, said the perplexed ones, incredulously!
Q: Okay, you said that memory is subjective and an atom is not. If
memory is subjective, what you have just been describing means that
each and every person has a slightly different perspective, even if
they are involved with the same incident or the same time sequence.
A: Of course!
Q: But it also implies...
A: That is the treasury of learning.
Q:
Who is the treasurer?
A: The learner.
Q:
But still, what you said still implies that an atom has an
objective existence. Is this correct?
A: Yes.
Q:
Would you please tell us what constitutes objectivity?
A: The effort on the part of the observer to leave prejudice “at the
door.”
Q: How does the effort on the part of the observer to leave
prejudice at the door relate to the objective existence of an atom?
A: An atom, as with absolutely everything else, cannot exist without
an
observer.
Q: So, in the case of the objectivity of an atom, if the human
observers are not objective, where is the observer who makes the
atom objective, or does the atom not exist if there is no observer?
A: Yes. to the latter comment.
Q: Yes to which part?
A: The latter comment.
Q: So there must be an observer. Must the observer be human?
A: The observer must be a consciousness.
Q:
If you say that an atom has an objective existence, yet it only
exists if it is perceived by a consciousness, then an atom does not
have an objective existence, correct?
A: No.
Q:
Okay, what is the distinction? You say that objectivity is the
ATTEMPT on the part of the observer to leave prejudice at the door.
A: Without consciousness, there is neither objective or subjective!!
Q: So the crux is the attempt to leave prejudice at the door in the
same manner as one would be non-anticipatory in order to create?
A: Yes.
Q: Well, that is a VERY tricky...
(A) Is consciousness objective?
A: Consciousness is objective, until it has the capacity to choose
to be
otherwise.
Q: What is the stimulus for the change, for the giving of the
capacity to choose?
A: The introduction of prejudice.
Q: In a cosmic sense, cosmic consciousness, in the sense of The One
Unified Consciousness, what is the stimulus there for the ability to
choose?
A: When the journey has reached union with The One, all such lessons
have been
completed.
Q: But, that doesn’t answer the question.
A: Yes, it does!
Q: A little change of subject. Last night I had a bizarre
experience, I don’t think I would call it a dream, but it was
similar to what happened a couple of weeks ago. Out of this
experience, I was only able to bring up two words: 3 dominos, which
seemed to be extremely important. But now, they make no sense at
all. Could you give me some clue as to what the 3 dominos means and
what these experiences are that I am having?
A: One possible meaning: 3 Dominos pizza outlets in Gainesville!
Q: Alright, what is another possible meaning?
A: Three dominos missing from your dominos set.
Q: Okay, another one?
A: Your turn!
Q: Whatever it was, it was from a very deep level of the
subconscious and I knew that if I did not get it out, I would lose
it. Okay, when these events occur...
A: Not an important dream, Laura.
Q: Well, maybe it was not an important dream, but it was accompanied
by some very serious ... what was I doing?
(A) You were fighting.
(L) And that was what I was doing before. Struggling and fighting.
And, to my knowledge, I have never done this before in my life. I am
considered a monophasic sleeper.
(A) How do you know?
(L) Because I
have been told. I used to go to sleep in one position and wake up in
exactly the same way, and not even the covers would be messed up.
A: House is “affected.”
Q: This house is affected?
A: No.
Q: The house we were in in Gainesville?
A: Yes.
Q: Did it carry over from there?
A: Yes.
Q: What is it related to?
A: Oakwood Drive.
Q: The house we used to live in out in the country...
A: Turned around in bed.
Q: That refers to the night I woke up and found myself reversed in
the bed, my nightgown wet from the knees down, and there was simply
no way I could have turned around because I was sleeping against the
wall and there just wasn’t enough space. Are you saying I am having
memories of this coming to the surface?
A: Motor memories.
Q: Memories in the body?
A: Close.
Q: A and I were talking the other night about the symbol that
appeared in L’s driveway many years ago.
A: Winged Sceptor.
Q: (A) We wanted to know why you related it to Grays, but would not
say whether an abduction had taken place, and later you said that L
had never been abducted. So, how does that relate? What is the
connection?
A: Connections are not necessarily “time tracked.”
Q: Well, A remarked that it may not have related to L at all, but
that was a message to us in the present. What was the message and
who was it for?
A: Not a message. A marker.
Q: Is this a marker in the same sense as you described relating to
memory awhile ago?
A: Close.
Q: Who was this marker supposed to affect?
A: Not correct concept.
Q: What is the correct concept?
A: All events are synchronous only when perception becomes a
catalyst for
learning.
Q: (TH) What is the meaning of synchronous in this context?
A: Only discovered when the lesson is completed.
Q: (TH) Do they mean that all events exist somewhere outside of time
and that we just experience them sequentially?
A: Close, Tom.
Q: And why were discussing that particular item at that house in
Gainesville...
[TF’s notebook computer indicates that its batteries are getting low
by saying:
Hasta la vista, Baby!] (TH) There’s your answer! Deus et machina!
(L) Why did the discussion of this symbol come up, and more or less
synchronistically related to my battling dreams, and then you
mentioned motor memory and the incident at Oakwood Drive...
A:
Contemplate. Please do not leave just yet, Mr. French!
Q: Why do you not wish Tom to leave?
A: We may have some things to say to him.
Q: What?
A: Not yet.
Q: Cherie is the one who has to go. She is having allergic reactions
to smoke.
A: Really? What do you feel about things, about changes we
referenced for you
in our last communication to you?
Q:
(TF) It was necessary. Glad that it... that last year’s over.
A: It is not over.
Q: (TF) Yes, there are some more things to do...
A: There are many changes yet to come.
Q:
(TF) That’s true.
(L) Is Tom going to feel positive about at
least 50% of them?
A: About 100%. When the conclusion is reached you see, Tom, this
“struggle,” or
“challenge,” relating to the perceptions of the coming
ending/beginning of the millennium, was really a doorway opened by
your subconscious to begin the necessary process of examining the
metamorphosis of your own being.
Q: (TF) So, I had subconscious
motivations of my own when I decided to follow this subject? It was
for me?
A: Yes.
Q: (TF) Well, there has certainly been a lot of pain involved.
A: With pain comes renewal.
Q: (TF) What about the sickness I had at the beginning of the year?
A: Purging of built up “poisons” of an emotional/spiritual nature.
Q: (TF) I can certainly see that! Yes, that’s very true. But, you
have indicated more. What more can happen?
A: Now, finally, you will be able to move ahead and make significant
progress,
including ways not yet imagined!
Q: © What about for me?
A: Ask specifically.
Q: © Is the next year going to be like last year?
A: Well, obviously not. Beware of those who possess a nature of
thinking there
are plans set in concrete, and require the participation of you!
Q: © I don’t understand. Give me a hint.
A:
There is one close to you who believes your participation is
necessary for
their success or happiness. Look for disruption in efforts to sever
legal bonds.
Q: (L) We would like to be able to talk to Max Planck, and Nicola
Tesla, too.
Do you think you could arrange it like you arranged for us to talk
to Sandra?
A: Possibly, but the energies are scattered on the timeless plane of
5th density
when there is no personal acquaintance.
Q: (TH) Well, we are acquainted with Planck’s Constant!
(L) Yes,
there you go!
A: No, there you don’t go.
Q:
So, you are saying that it can be done, but that it will take a
little doing?
A: Yes.
Q: Apparently Sandra and Keith could come through because of psychic
links.
Could you like, make an appointment with Max and Tesla so we could
talk to them?
Can we assume that they are still there, they have not reincarnated?
A: Appointment? Get real! That dimension is timeless, i.e. essence
extensions
for your beings are “still” there, too!
Q:
Well, on that note, we will say good night and save the chat with
Planck for a later session.
A: Good night.
End of Session
Back to Contents
April 12, 1997
Freddie, Alice, Melissa, Violette, Laura
Q: Hello.
A: Hello.
Q: And who do we have with us this evening?
A: Wosarriea.
Q: And where do you transmit from?
A: Cassiopaea.
Q: We have a guest this evening, Melissa, and I have a number of
questions that I have been jotting down during the week. But, I
guess we need to ask the question that is bugging Violette so she
can calm down over there.
A: Crash.
Q: Yes, the recent plane crash in Colorado. Can you tell us what
happened?
A: Pilot became outed, plane continued on a course as plotted by
magnetometers
employed by ground based radar and control systems.
Q: What do you mean by “pilot became outed?”
A: Consciousness terminated.
Q: Naturally or by actions of an outside source?
A: Watch future reports for clues.
Q: (V) Well, I wanted to know if it had anything to do with UFOs.
(L) That was where I was heading, but they said to watch for clues.
A: Wait and see.
Q: (L) Next question: I would like to know what is the “Council of
Nine,” as I have read about in several books. Now, there was an
ancient council of nine, and then there is the one talked about by
Phyllis Schlemmer, and it is supposed to be group of aliens located
somewhere in North Dakota, or something like that. Are there any
references on the council of nine that you can give us?
A:
Partial deception.
Q: Partial deception in the ancient references, or the modern ones?
A: Take ancient references and interpret modern accounts according
to current
events profile.
Q: Okay. I can do that. Onto the other questions. One of the ancient
apocryphal texts recounts the story that Joseph, husband of Mary,
the mother of Jesus, described the night that Jesus was born and in
that account, he described an event that could only be “frozen
time.” In other words, he said that time stopped. He described
people sitting at dinner with their food half-way to their mouths,
arms frozen, jaws frozen in the act of chewing, and the same effect
with cattle and so forth. But, that he was on his way to get a
midwife when this occurred. Did, in fact, time stop at the time of
the birth of Jesus?
A: Time “stops” for many at many times according to their individual
sensitivity
levels.
Q: According to sensitivity level. Why does sensitivity level have
something to do with time stopping?
A: It has stopped for you too.
Q: Does it ever stop for the whole planet at once?
A: It never “started.”
Q: It’s just perception. This is a funny question: I have a red
birthmark on the back of my head, in the hair, my brother has one,
and I noticed that Ark has one, too. What is the significance of
this birthmark, if any?
A: Later.
Q: Okay. Not going to answer that. Now, I would like to know who the
Olmecs were.
A: Be more specific.
Q: Okay, what is the genetic origin of the Olmecs?
A: Basically the same as yours.
Q: In some of the ancient carvings of the Olmecs, they were always
carved with a cleft in their foreheads. Did this represent an actual
physical cleft?
A: Designation in the art work is for “The Nation of the Third Eye.”
Q: We have talked about the Nation of the Third Eye before. What is
the third eye and how does one activate it?
A: What do you think?
Q: Well, what I think may be erroneous. Is it the pineal gland?
A: May be part of the picture.
Q: Is the third eye something one can use to view their reality?
A: Ditto.
Q: What is the best method for activating it?
A: This is a good one, for example.
Q: Oh, you mean channeling. There was an ancient custom of skull
trepanation.
Why were ancient peoples volunteering to have their heads cut open
in droves?
A: Trying to locate the source of the mystery.
Q: Did any of them succeed with this operation?
A: We seriously doubt it.
Q: Well, well. What was the origin of the practice of human
sacrifice?
A: We have answered many of these inquiries for you before, in so
many ways.
Q: Yes, I know. But, I don’t think I ever asked this question
directly, though there are allusions to it.
A: Allusions provide pieces to the mosaic, thus empowering your
learning
channel.
Q: Why are you hitting all the letters off to the side tonight?
A: Energy fields vary according to electromagnetic condition
variances in the
atmosphere surrounding your 3rd density locator.
Q: What is the source of this present variance?
A: Solar flare.
Q: (V) So the recent solar flare is having an impact! And the news
people said it was not big enough to be experienced in any way.
(L)
One of the things I was doing last night was a little web search on
the word “brana,” because we have a particular interest in finding
out if there is any significance to this. I found some very
interesting things about this word. I discovered that it was an Old
English word for a blackbird or crow. It can also be a name in
Yugoslavia and Russia. It was also the name of a great Irish king.
Anything further you can add to that list?
A: What does this tell you?
Q: Well, that maybe the source of funding is not in this country.
Maybe Russia?
A: Beware of unexpected assistance.
Q: We can be wary and still utilize it, can’t we?
A: Up to you.
Q: If, if fact, there is a power mad clique running the world, what
difference would it make if you got money from one country or
another?
A: That is not the point:who is “running” the “power mad clique?”
Q: (L) So...
(V) The Lizzies, the Lizzies...
A: Okay...
Q: So you are essentially indicating in a roundabout way that we
ought to ditch this offer?
A: Not so. We are indicating in a straightforward way that you
should strive
for objectivity at all times, and especially at junctures such as
this, and not let subjectivity or emotions or hastily thought of
ideas or decisions rule you!
Q: Could it also be possible that this source, this “brana,” is in
contact with the alleged Orion group?
A: Excuse us?
Q: I mean the Quorum as you have described?
A:
Always be vigilant so as not to perceive a tangled web as a
neatly
constructed loop
Q: The suggestion was made in another session that we need to devote
some time and energy to the crop circle problem.
A: Yes...
Q: And finding funding to do this in the correct way, as in
networking and so on, is difficult, to say the least.
A: Patience pays... “Haste makes waste.”
Q: Well, we would not be doing it primarily to develop technology,
but for information of a more cosmic or theoretical nature. Now,
whether that would lead to technology is another question.
A:
Review from whence and how this offer originated before you “leap
into it,”
lest you become the fish that is attracted to the really shiny and
tasty looking lure!
Q: Well, then...
A: Review for insight... it will come!
Q: Who was responsible for the lost luggage?
A: Polish authorities. Now, in addendum to previous discusion: Ask
and you
shall receive. Receive without asking, and you shall be deceived!
Q: Ask and you shall receive. In what direction should we focus the
asking without risk of being deceived?
A: Suggest you start by approaching channels you have some knowledge
of, and in
whom you have some degree of trust! Contact Colin Andrews, maybe?
But, keep all options and avenues for research and funding open.
Q: Is this the most we can get on this for now?
A:
Probably...
Q: Let me go back to the luggage. The Polish authorities, as in
which branch?
A: Secret police.
Q: What were they looking for? Just anything?
A: Yes.
Q: Did they satisfy themselves that there was nothing subversive in
there?
A: Yes.
Q: Why, then, did they cause the luggage to be delivered where it
was?
A: Honest mistake.
Q: (L) Was this mistake stimulated by the Lizzies?
A: In that vein, there is little in your STS locator that is not,
ultimately.
Q: What was the reaction of the recipient of the luggage?
A: Stunned.
Q: Was I correct when I thought that there was rushing off to find
someone to translate the tape?
A: Well, it was more like rushing off to “find my lawyer.”
Q: Is this information going to be used in a detrimental way against
him?
A: Yes.
Q: Is the luggage going to be returned?
A: Wait and see... “Stay tuned, fasten your seatbelts,” etc...
Q: Anything further you can give to help me sleep tonight?
A: Ask...
Q: Is it going to prolong the proceedings?
A: Open.
Q: Will she show up at the hearing?
A: Will most likely ask for a delay, based upon “new information,”
to be entered
into evidence.
Q: Would it be a good idea for him to suggest that he can get an
American divorce?
A: Good idea!!
Q: Should it be let out so that she will hear of it?
A: Why not proceed discreetly?
Q: Would it be advisable to pursue the money issue?
A: It might be advisable for A to simply concentrate upon his new
beginning as
opposed to the old, dead past...
Q: Does that mean that he will not be able to get the legal affairs
straightened out in Poland?
A: This is a complicated situation which will unfold in a proper way
if handled
in a positive, forward looking manner.
Q:
Forward looking would be looking to the future?
A:
Yes.
Q: Does that mean looking out for some of his interests?
A: See previous response.
Q: My original thought was that he should just walk away from it,
let her have it. There are other opportunities.
A: Look ahead, not back.
Q: I think that the pictures and tape will be gone when he gets the
luggage back.
A: Wait and see.
Q: Why was she stunned at what was in the luggage?
A: Think of all that was in the luggage, and you will know the
answer to that
question.
Q: Was it the pictures?
A: See previous answer, obsession aideth not, my dear!
Q: I am not obsessed! I am curious.
A: Worry not, just sit back and enjoy the show!
Q: I can’t enjoy myself if I think she is going to make him suffer!
A: No more on this!
Q: Okay, recently when I asked about reality merges, and you talked
about reality bridges, and at another time we talked about Freddie’s
life changing at the time that “reality is abridged.” Is there a
relationship between those concepts?
A: Of course!
Q: You mentioned important junctures. Do these junctures relate to
time markers as you have also mentioned?
A: Yes.
Q: Is it so that when one makes a certain choice or decision, one
can either enter or exit, or both, one universal construct or
another?
A: Maybe.
Q: Okay, if one makes certain extremely significant choices in one’s
life, at certain significant junctures, does that change one’s
reality in a complete way?
A: Just remember this: as we have told you before, network,
meditate, learn and
strive for answers, and ask for what you need. Always be in control
of your own ship...
Q: (M) There is a symbol that always comes to my mind, and I would
like to know what this symbol means? [draws symbol which looks like
two spirals back to back.]
A: The duality of body and spirit... the two perfectly interlock for
those in
the physical/material planes. One reflects the other always in the
timeless existence of all creation!
Q: What is the origin of that symbol?
A: Symbols always naturally evolve of pure consciousness
thoughtform.
Q: Anything further on that symbol?
A: No.
Q: Can it be used for anything?
A: Learning, the empowerment that arises from the acquisition of
knowledge.
Q: We thank you, and good night.
A:
Good night.
End of Session
Back to Contents
April 19, 1997
Private Session -
Freddie, Laura
Q: Hello.
A: Hello.
Q: Who do we have this evening?
A: Yopanno.
Q: And where are you transmitting from?
A:
Cassiopaea.
Q: Am I on the right track with the “bloodline” research?
A: Sure.
Q: Am I going to discover some more startling things with this
“bloodline” research?
A: Discovery is the fruit of inquiry.
Q: Am I correct in my assessment that the origin of the Grail
stories was the story of the Head of Bran?
A: But what was the “origin” of Brahna?
Q: Well, from the way I am interpreting what I have found, I have
two possibilities: One is the Celts from Kantek, and two: a Nephilim
hybrid.
A: Could be one and the same.
Q: Well, from what you have said in prior sessions, these bloodlines
can be of positive or negative orientation, a duality, and that they
lead to super-secret power sources. Is that correct?
A: Well, the duality is existent concommitantly through all
bloodlines, but in
the so-called celts, it is more pronounced, therefore, there are
more vivid power cells and centers.
Q: Are these cells and centers that you talk about, are they
something that is located in the body or a part of the spirit-body
connection...
A: The extant body.
Q: What do you mean by “extant” body?
A: Existent/external.
Q: Okay, I will keep digging. How can I find if there is going to be
a connection between the Aryan/Jewish bloodline of Jesus and the
Merovingian/Plantagenet bloodline? Does it exist?
A: Only to the extent of the shared origins of the essenes and the
celts.
Q: A mentioned that he used to think that he was Jewish. Is he, or
half?
A: If you are going to find anything, you need not be foretold.
Q: Am I going to find anything?
A: Just do it.
Q: I did a little card reading while he was going to see his
daughter for the first time in almost 6 months, and I pulled up one
card that said “sickness unto death.” And, I had asked what would be
the result on me of this meeting with his daughter, and this is what
it said. I was very upset because I had the dream about dying when I
was up in Gainesville. Can you tell me anything? I was upset!
A: Cards mean only what the vibrations provide.
Q: Were my vibrations that I was going to get sick and die, or that
our relationship was going to get sick and die, the daughter was
going to be sick and die, or A or A or...
A: Every physical vehicle experiences “sickness unto death.”
Q: My question was: what would be the result of this meeting with
his daughter.
Now, you are worrying me.
A: Why worry? Do you not see that which you have accomplished up to
now,
through desire begetting sheer will, begetting realization?!?
Q: Could I have been picking up vibrations of A having someone put some
sort of hex on me?
A: What difference does it make?
Q: Well, once before when someone did this, you said I was sick
because these dark forces were concentrated on me.
A: What is our most famous saying?
Q: Knowledge protects.... Well, does having knowledge of her nature
provide
protection?
A: You are not realizing your power.
Q: So, I don’t even need that?
A: No,
Q: Okay. Now, I thought about it and reasoned it out, and am nearly
positive that she took the pictures, tape and Brana letters. The
pictures I can understand. Either to spite me or him, or to use in a
negative way. Or is there another option? I am not seeking
confirmation, just trying to settle it so I can get away from it.
A: Then it is settled, so go away from it!
Q: Well, what I am really trying to get to is this: some of those
pictures were irreplaceable. I would like to recover them. Can you
suggest something?
A: Let the pieces fall into place.
Q: A went to talk to his daughter and felt very sorry for her. Was
she being used as a frequency emitter? There were very strange
sensations I had from this. Is this possible, and did it happen?
A: Maybe.
Q: Why did he suddenly change his mind about me coming there to be
with him as soon as possible?
A: He suffers from “cold feet,” as you have seen on many occasions,
this too,
shall pass. Remember what hesaid to you on the night of February 11,
12?
Q: Yes, I do.
A: And what happened next?
Q: Well, then he recovered.
A: Because of you and your actions.
Q: Yes. And what I did was almost walk out the door and not look
back... I think it scared him more to lose me than to face his
fears.
A: Familiar pattern, in this existence, and previous ones. Yes?
Q: Well, that is funny. He gets afraid, I react to his fear by
running away, and then he fears for me, and out of this fear he
gains strength.
A: Each fear is is aided and abetted by you.
Q: How do I aid and abet his fears?
A: You incite it by pointing out to him what his options are, in no
uncertain
terms!!!
Q: Is that good or bad?
A: Either/or.
Q: Does it help him or hurt him?
A: Ditto.
Q: Should I stop and hold my tongue? What am I supposed to do?
A: Karmic level 1 situation.
Q: Well, can you tell me about anything from a past life that would
give me something to ponder?
A: Your memories are correct.
Q: Well, I would be afraid of me, too if I had died thinking I was
unfaithful. I would like to know something I could do that would be
most helpful and of great benefit to him?
A: Learning is fun!
Q: Well, sometimes it is not so fun, especially if I hurt someone.
Is this behavior evidence of some kind of weakness?
A: No. Check horoscope.
Q: Oh, I see. The Libra Moon. Wants to make the perfect decision.
What are the chances that we will have enough money to spend some
time together before the Fall?
A: If you want it, you got it!
Q: But, I am worried about the baby. What can I do about the kids?
A: This is going around in circles.
Q: As much as I want to think otherwise, I am worried that his
daughter has spent so much time with her mother that she is beyond
saving.
A: Arkadiusz is nondemonstrative.
Q:
He is not that way with me... what does that relate to?
A: Relationship with family members.
Q: What does that have to do with whether or not the girl is
salvageable?
A: Who child had most exposure to.
Q: Well, to her mother. And, he said that he finally had the first
real conversation with the kid in her entire life and she is 27
years old!
A: Does this tell you anything?
Q:
I guess so. I don’t think he will get anywhere with her. Getting
back to the items taken from the suitcase, the other thing was the
journal, in which he compared to her to me and talked about going
after the Nobel Prize. Is the journal the item that was stunning to
her?
A: All was.
Q: Which of the pictures was most stunning?
A: All equally.
Q: Why were they stunning?
A: “Drove home the reality.”
Q: Why were the Brana letters taken?
A: Was just more stuff.
Q: Did she, herself, remove and replace the seal on the luggage?
A: Aided.
Q: Her horoscope seems to say that she is somewhat degenerated in
sexual terms.
Is it a possiblity that she was unfaithful?
A: Open.
Q: A told me about her preferences, and I am of the opinion that
such things express a spiritual truth about a person. So, without
mentioning it, could you name the spiritual concept or attitude
behind her expressions in this way?
A: Groping for fantasy.
Q: Did she ever, at any time, Love him?
A:
Jackie Onassis syndrome.
Q: Her horoscope seems to say that she is going to either end up in
jail or in a hospital.
A: We suggest you dwell upon more positive aspects vis a vis you and
him, etc...
Q: If A has money in a bank outside of Poland, why is he doing the
poor mouth, and why does he not let me know that I don’t need to
worry, and why does he borrow money from other people to give to me,
to pay bills?
A: The Libran balancing act, by its very nature, must include some
deception.
Q: But he is so adamant that we be open with each other! Why would
he hide something from me?
A: In his mind, he is telling all, but, there will always, always be
pages
missing, better to learn to accept.
Q: I can accept that, I have just decided that it isn’t so.
A: And if believing that makes you feel more secure, then so be it!
But, you
really love mystery in small doses; it stimulates thee!
Q: Is it
important for me to go to Europe in any way? To do anything
significant?
A: No.
Q: Is there any significant reason to go other than to be with him?
A: Learning.
Q: I need a word of wisdom. A clue to follow....
A: Blue water, white skies.
Q: What does that mean?
A: You asked for a clue!
Q: Oh! Okay. Thanks and good night.
A: Good night.
May 3, 1997
Freddie, Alice, TomK, Laura
Q: Hello.
A: Hello.
Q: And what name shall we use this evening?
A:
Jimmorra.
Q: And where are you transmitting from?
A: Cassiopaea.
Q: I have quite a number of questions this evening. The first one
is: is it possible for a person to be used as a monitor, to monitor
other people’s activities through their eyes and ears?
A: Possible, but hardly necessary.
Q: You once said that PZ was like a monitor, that wherever she went,
she monitored aural frequencies for whoever had put the implant into
her. Was this an unusual situation?
A: Most likely.
Q: Last week we did not have a session, but went through the notes I
have been making since I was in Gainesville. Freddie became very
tired and went home. I was not tired. I would like to ask about
this. Usually, Freddie is not tired, and I am the one that is
exhausted. I would like to ask about this. Is there some sort of
energy exchange that takes place during channeling?
A: Not in that way.
Q: Well, both Terry and Jan commented on this, and I would like to
know if there is any relationship of this reversal to the fact that
we did not do a session?
A: Terry and Jans comments in this case should be viewed with
caution, as they
may be nebulous in their intent.
Q:
When you say nebulous... my perception was that they wanted to
develop a separate channel, as before.
A: They wanted to pursue their own idea of casting doubts upon
Freddie.
Q: Well, not only was that going on, but I was sharing the
information that I had gathered in response to clues given in the
material, and I had the impression that it was not interesting to
them. Yet, I thought that the fact that clues in the material had
led to such discoveries was extremely important...
A: Interesting to some includes only that which casts the spotlight
upon
themselves.
Q: Okay. I have the idea. Now, let me ask about the really strange
things that I have been discovering. I am sure that I am not even
halfway through it. But, let me ask this: am I correct in my
thinking that following the genetic clues is part of the key...
A: Connect the dots and when you have finished, you will have a
“Gaugin.”
Q: Hmmm...
(A) In other words, a masterpiece...
(L) Okay, we know
that the bloodline is important by virtue of being of the Nordic or
Celtic heritage. In going through the transcripts, I came across
numerous instances where a “sect” was mysteriously mentioned over
and over again. I am thinking that this sect, as you call it, is
this organization that we refer to as the “Quorum.”
A: What is “sect” the root word of?
Q: Sector, section, (T) sectarian...
(A) A branch...
(L) Anything
else you want to add to that?
A: Ask away.
Q:
Does this other group that you have mentioned, the Nation of the
Third Eye, are they one and the same?
A: The Third Eye expands vision into the unseen.
Q: Seeing the unseen. You mentioned once before that the
“Rosicrucians act as a thief in the night.” You also mentioned that
I ought to dig into the Rosicrucians, and I went to the University
library, and it was essentially missing...
A: Connect the Rosicrucians to your favorite island by the “beech.”
Horticulturally, please, and family.
Q: Oak Island?
A: Yup! Then, connect the Pyrenees to the Canaries.
Q: Okay, a “thief in the night.” The destruction of the Templars...
A: Research the history of the Canary Islands for clue.
Q: Is there any connection to the fact that those guys at the
University of
Tenerife were communicating back in February and March? Might there
be more to this connection?
A: Maybe, but do you know the history of this place?
Q: Well, no I don’t. That one slipped by. I will follow that one...
You also once before said that when a certain 7 people assembled
into a perpendicular reality, that the learning would be
exponential. I am sure we are not there yet, but I am wondering if
this information I have discovered about bloodlines and potential
activation of DNA has any connection to that idea?
A: Build your staircase one step at a time.
Q: Reading through the session of May 23, last year, when Tom was
also here, and the issue of his being in O’Brien was addressed, you
asked who had begged him to stay there, then there was a remark
about an EM vector. The way I understood it is that a person can be
an EM vector. Is that possible?
A: Vector means focuser of direction.
Q: Could that mean that EM waves can be vectored by a human being
simply by their presence? I also noticed that several of us have
been involved with persons and relationships that seem designed to
confuse, defuse, and otherwise distort our learning, as well as
drain our energy. Basically, keeping us so stressed that we cannot
fulfill our potential. Is there some significance to this
observation?
A: That is elementary, my dear Knight!
Q: One of the things I have learned is that these individuals seem
to attach via some sort of psychic hook that enters through our
reactions of pity. Can you comment on the nature of pity?
A:
Pity those who pity.
Q: But, the ones who are being pitied, who generate sensations of
pity, do not really pity anybody but themselves.
A: Yes...?
Q: Then, is it true as my son said, when you give pity, when you
send love and light to those in darkness, or those who complain and
want to be “saved” without effort on their own part, when you are
kind in the face of abuse and manipulation, that you essentially are
giving power to their further disintegration, or contraction into
self- ishness? That you are powering their descent into STS?
A:
You know the answer!
Q: Yes. I have seen it over and over again. Were the individuals in
our lives selected for the extremely subtle nature of their
abilities to evoke pity, or were we programmed to respond to pity so
that we were blind to something that was obvious to other people?
A: Neither. You were selected to interract with those who would
trigger a
hypnotic response that would ultimately lead to a drain of energy.
Q: (T) Well, it is a fact, because my energy is sure drained.
(L)
What is the purpose of this draining of energy?
A: What do you think?
Q: (T) So you can’t concentrate or do anything. You can’t get
anywhere with anything.
A: Or, at least not the important things.
Q: (T) Is that why my concentration is so low?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Is L a robot type?
A: You are dealing with a no-win situation!!
Q:
It is a no win situation...
A: As you know.
Q: (T) So, if I don’t get out, I will just keep going down. Is it
the area or the person?
A: Both. One is wrapped within the other.
Q: (L) Why is it that it seems to be one of the primary things about
us that
prevents us from acting against such situations, is our fear of
hurting another
person? That was the chief thing that kept me in my marriage for so
long. And,
only when I knew that it was hurting the kids more to stay, did I
have the power
to get out. Why are we so afraid of hurting someone’s feelings if
they are
hurting us?
A: Not correct concept. You do not need to “act against them,” you
need to act
in favor of your destiny.
Q: But, when you do that, these persons make you so completely
miserable that there seems to be no other choice but a parting of
the ways.
A: Yes, but that is not “acting against.” Quite the contrary. In
fact,
remember, it takes two to tango, and if you are both tangoing when
the dance hall bursts into flames, you both get burned!!!
Q: Why is it that when one trys to extricate from such a “tango,”
why is there is such violent resistance to letting you go when it is
obvious, clearly obvious, that they do not have any feeling for you
as a human being?
A: It is not “they.” We are talking about conduits of attack.
Q: What is it that makes them susceptible to becoming conduits of
attack?
A: All STS are candidates for this. There are only about 6 billion
of you
though.
Q: Okay, all people can be conduits of attack.
(L) Would just coming
down and working with us on Saturdays, on a regular basis, help him
to get his concentration back?
A: Making the necessary changes would.
Q: Is it true that being in the presence of such people, that one is
under the influence of an energy, an emanation from them physically,
that befuddles the mind and makes it almost impossible to think
ones’ way out of the situation?
A: It is the draining of energy that befuddles the mind.
Q: Where does this energy drain to?
A: 4th density STS.
Q: They drain our energy from us and 4th density STS harvests it
from them?
A: “They” do nothing!!!! 4th density STS does it all through them!
Q: (T) Well, I would like to know what is it in us that makes us
attracted to such people.
A: It was the idea of 4th density STS.
Q: That means that they can control your thoughts and emotions, put
ideas into your head, and you think it is a good idea to “save”
someone. You don’t know. It is taught in our religions and culture
to give until it hurts, and, in fact, to give because it hurts. The
whole situation is designed and controlled from another level. Any
further comment on this subject?
A: Once you have truly learned the program, just plug it in.
Q: I guess once you have truly learned what is being said here, just
plug it in...
A: No. We mean that all you have to do is learn the patterns of
behavior, the
subtle signs, and you will always have the ability of avoiding it.
Your own as well as others.
Q: So, once you have learned the program from this person, you will
be able to avoid getting into another, similar one.
(T) But, I
should have learned it from H. I did the same thing twice.
(L) Well,
when you are wounded, it is hard to see clearly.
A: The signs were present, but you did not read them.
Q: You ignored it.
A: No, he did not yet know the program. Anticipate not!
Q: I guess that means that when you are thinking that you can change
another person, or that changing something about what you are doing
naturally will help them, you are anticipating.
A: Or that it would be different that it turned out to be.
Q: Well, you knew that there was a lot wrong in the beginning, but
you thought that it would be different.
Q: Ark’s mother is sick. Will she be better soon?
A: Wait and see.
Q: He is carrying a very heavy burden just now, and I am concerned
for him.
A: Does this surprise you? Unfortunately, Ark still does not
completely know
this program.
Q: Are you suggesting that this sickness of his mother’s has been
caused from 4th density STS?
A: Lesson number 1: Always expect attack. Lesson number 2: Know the
modes of
same. Lesson number 3: Know how to conteract same.
Q: When a person
is sick, old and one’s mother... the only thing to do is take care
of it. But, I guess that it is true that anything that tends to
cause interference in doing what one is here to do could be
considered attack. Whether it is your mother being sick, or your kid
falling off a bicycle and breaking his arm. It is all related to
lack of vigilance on the part of the one who is the conduit of
attack.
A: When you are under attack, expect the unexpected, if it is going
to cause
problems...
Q: So, if there is something that can cause problems, expect it to
happen.
A: But, if you expect it, you learn how to “head it off,” thus
neutralizing it.
This is called vigilance, which is rooted in knowledge. And, what
does knowledge do?
Q: Protects! Is there anything I can do to help?
A: How so?
Q: Well, I don’t know. I guess that a person just has to come to the
full realization that virtually everything that happens on the
planet - no exceptions - is a symbol of some interaction of STS vs
STO energy at higher levels.
A: Yes, and that is not as of yet realized. It must be part of a
natural
learning process.
Q: Well, I guess that all of us tend to keep one or another area
sacrosanct and think that it is not subject to attack, or that we
can use logic and 3rd density thinking to explain it. Until a person
realizes that attack can come through even one’s self, wives and
husbands, children and parents, friends, virtually ANYBODY - NOBODY
is exempt.
A: The block is a lack of faith in the concept. Remember, when one
has been
indoctrinated by religion, culture and/or science, they are
predisposed to view all things in the sense of the measureable
physical reality exclusively.
Q: Well, in Ark’s case, is something
going to happen for him that will give him a view under the surface,
so to speak?
A: Please do not anticipate. This is a logjam of “quantum”
proportions.
Q: Well, I think he is cured of thinking that certain people can be
helped.
A: But he is not cured of his lack of faith in the reality of
non-physical
attack.
Q: Speaking of non-physical attack, I went through some things this
morning that were rather unpleasant. I later discovered that at the
same time I was experiencing this, there was communication from the
Brana woman. Is there a connection between his correspondence with
her and my feeling that an elephant is sitting on my chest? When
this happens, I actually feel like my spirit is being compressed in
a painful way. Is there a relationship between this and the Brana
person.
A: Maybe.
Q: Is there any relationship between the Brana correspondence and
the fact that Jim also wrote to him and JW, the spook, called me
today?
A: Maybe.
Q: Is there any relationship between all of these portals of attack,
and the things I have been discovering in the past week or so?
A: Maybe.
Q: Can you tell me anything about this at all?
A: If it does not need to be answered, that may mean that it has
already been
answered, simply because, thoughk you have much still to learn, you
have learned so much already, my dear. And, on that note, good
night.
Q: Good night.
End of Session
Back to Contents
May 21, 1997
Private Session -
Freddie, Laura
Q: Hello.
A: Hello.
Q: And who do we have with us this evening?
A: Xyorra.
Q: And where do you transmit from?
A: Cassiopaea.
Q: I have a whole bunch of questions: First, in the past week, Dimi,
Jim and SJB contacted Ark. I simultaneously had another of those
experiences where I felt that an elephant was sitting on me, or
compressing me. I have a theory that there is some sort of frequency
wave that activates ‘agents’and their preimplanted programs to
contact their ‘target,’ and that the frequency is what I perceive as
the ‘compression.’ Is this possible?
A: Yes. Notice how contact intensifies post put off?
Q: What? What is ‘post put off?’
A: After Ark delivered message indicating declining interest.
Q: Oh, I see. Is the sensation I experience strictly related to a
frequency? I mean, I was thinking that I was having this feeling
because force was being taken by them from me through his bond to
me, that his response to them closed the circuit. Would I have
suffered whether he responded or not?
A: Waves unify significant events.
Q: Well, what does that mean?
A: It is interrelated.
Q: Would a blank wall, termination of contact, minimize my
suffering?
A: Only you can tell.
Q: Well, he knows who and what they are, and there is also the view
that by continuing interaction, it prevents OTHER portals from being
opened. In other words, the devil you know is better than the devil
you don’t know.
A: Oh yeah?!?
Q: So, this does not prevent others from coming along?
A: Unless one prevents fires by watching only the matches.
Q: What are the matches?
A: That is not the point. Does one prevent sinking just by looking
out for
icebergs?
Q: No, one steers away from them. Is that what you mean?
A: Oh... We see... Then you must mean by inference that the only
cause of
sinking is icebergs, yes??
Q: Oh. So, there is a lot more that can cause one to sink than
icebergs. Well, I was just concerned about the fact that there has
been repeated events of this kind. It seems that I get the horrible
feeling of being compressed even before they contact him... and then
it just snowballs. And, it always seems to come at about the time I
have my period, when I am most vulnerable and least capable of
coping with such things.
A: When your periods cease, the contacts will not. Yes.
Q: Yes to what?
A: It is soon now.
Q: Well, Dimi claims to be able to do repeatable, controlled PK.
What kind of PK is he talking about since he is so adamant about not
talking about it?
A: Not important. Maybe he can do repeatable, controlled B.S.
Q: Okay, some time ago when I had the ‘3 dominos’ dream, or
experience. I asked you about this, and you said it was not an
important dream. Yet, it led to an incredible series of discoveries.
Why did you say it was not important?
A: What was important, the dream or the discoveries?
Q: Well, of course the discoveries... and there really were no
dominos... but it gave me a teensy idea that helped with all the
rest... and one thing led to another to another...
A: Dream was not important until fulfilled.
Q: Anyway, I found at the same longitude as Oak Island, a place with
the name
“Percee.” This led to Fontainebleau, Chartres, and Coll du Perche
and Moulins la
Marche. Then, the ‘blue waters and white skies’ led to lake Geneva
and Point
Perce. And this was the third ‘Percy’...
A: Devour newspapers for any recent news re: Percy.
Q: Okay. So, then I had the thought that ‘Percy’ was the center of
an incredibly complex web. It was like what you had described for me
before: mosaic consciousness. I could see connections no matter
which way I looked. I mean, literally everything connects...
alchemy, Rosicrucians, Masons, physics, genetics, eschatology,
Cassiopaea, prime numbers, Medusa, Perseus... I mean, it is the most
incredible thing I have ever seen in my life...
A: So far...
Q: Okay. But, that led to the idea of the universe being like a sort
of spider web, with the spider being at the center... kind of an
expanded and more complex ‘perpendicular reality’ idea. All the
levels connected by the threads, or conduits... the gravity binder
from the spider in the center... am I onto something here?
A:
Stay tuned...
Q: I hate it when you do that!
A: But you love it when you discover!
Q:
Well, that is certainly true. But, one of the things I was
thinking about was: If one were to stand on some spot on this
mountain, Point Perce, near Geneva, and faced in the direction of
Coll du Perche and Moulins la Marche, the compass heading would be
315. And, a day or so after I had thought this and mentioned it, Ark
found a paper in a journal, and the number was 33, page 315, I
believe. So, I am wondering if this is another clue that has been
confirmed this way and what would I see if I did such a thing?
A: Discover?
Q: Does it have anything to do with the Frankenstein dream, which
seemed to contain all the basic elements of the following weeks’
discoveries. Does it have something to do with putting something in
a particular place in one life to come back for it in another? Or,
is it that all the clues...
A: You should know by now that all this will be revealed as
appropriate.
Q: Okay. Now, the 64,000 dollar question... tunnels, longitude of
Oak Island, leading to Pointe Perce, Mont Blanc and the St. Bernard
Tunnel, and St. Bernard wrote the rules for the Templars... and
then, Tenerife, the Canaries and the latitude of 28:30 connected to
the spider in the King James version of Proverbs 30:28... and that
leads directly to New Port Richey. Therefore, is there some
connection between the location of this house and something on the
Canary Islands?
A: You have made much progress, expect more, if vigilant and
persistant!
Q: Well, you know I am that! Well, at the time the question was
‘could the position of my house over a tunnel be detrimental?’ And
the answer was ‘yes.’ Then, the question was ‘how?’ which led to the
answer ‘That is the 64,000 dollar question. So, is there any further
that I can have at this time?
A: Detrimental is subjective, according to unfolding events and
choices.
Q: So, it was a question at that time, the BIG question as to what I
was going to choose to do...
A: Close.
Q: At that time, it was also said that there was a vortex here that
merges levels 1,2,3, and 4 with density 5. And, you said that the
primary issue about this was ‘the physical imprint locator.’ What is
this?
A: Forces that tune and influence participants on the various above
mentioned
density levels.
Q: The other night, I guess at the time that the Jim, Dimi, and SJB
thing was brewing, I had a terrible dream of a person trying to
break into my house... that Arielle had followed Violette out, and I
had to get her back, and this put me in danger... then, I was afraid
that he was going to start trying to kill us while we were in the
house by shooting through the walls. Ark, Freddie and Tom did not
seem to be quite as alarmed as I was... I woke up with my heart
nearly beating out of my chest and covered with a cold sweat, and
somewhat paralyzed. I recognize this sort of dream from before. Was
it just a dream, a warning, a screen memory of some other event? It
was very frightening.
A: Choose selection two above. Always be aware of your significance
as the
possessor and potential purveyor of unusually high level knowledge
store. And, what that means to those who would prefer that it not
be.
Q: Is there more I could do in terms of protecting my children?
That is where I am most vulnerable and I am not sure that they
understand the seriousness of the situation.
A: What do signs keep telling you? Who took what positions and
behaviors in the
dream? Well?
Q: Yes... I realize that it was because of going out to do something
ordinary... not thinking... while Ark and Tom and Freddie were
distracted... and I was just concerned about Arielle...
A:
And what role did Violette play?
Q: I see. Like the Pied Piper?
A: Or maybe programmed decoy, due to FRV?
Q:
What is FRV?
A: Frequency Resonance Vibration.
Q: Is there any danger to Anna and Jaason with these kids and church
people they have been around the past few weeks?
A: What do you think?!? It is a vulnerable age for anyone, much more
so for the
children of one on path to super consciousness, and incontact with
those who provide advice and data...
Q: Well, this church group makes me very uneasy. What can I say to
them to make them understand how very vulnerable I am through them?
A: Tell them the truth as you would tell others, of more mature
stature.
Q: Any other advice where they are concerned? This whole situation
absolutely gives me the willies.
The tape stopped recording for some reason at this point. I asked
about the missing tapes and they indicated that they WERE taken by
some person who had been in my house with the idea to use them to
harm me in some way. The C’s would not tell me who, saying that this
would lead me off in a futile and harmful direction. Then, they
pointed out that I should be always aware of keeping the tapes very
secure from now on.
Next, I asked about the missing program and was told that this was
done from “outside” also, though not by human agent.
And then they gave a rather lengthy closing statement about pursuing
the search in the Canaries... to learn every single detail of the
history of this place...
May 31, 1997
Freddie, Laura, Alice.
Q: Now, I have a couple of questions for Ark, first of all, and then
will get on to my questions. The first question is...
A: You did not ask: “Hello.”
Q: I’m sorry! Hello!
A: In a bit of a rush, are we?
Q: And who do we have with us this evening?
A: Zollanah.
Q: And where are you transmitting from?
A: Cassiopaea.
Q: Okay, I am not so much in a rush as I want to fit as much in as I
can. First question: You say that EM is interwoven with gravity.
Santilli says that EM and gravity are the same. But, then there is
light. Light is EM radiation. If so, then how is it that gravity,
which is interwoven with EM, travels faster than EM, that is:
supercedes light speed?
A: Gravity does not “travel.”
Q: Well, when you say that gravity ‘supercedes’ light speed, what
exactly do you mean?
A: Gravity is equally located in all realms at once, in space/time.
Q: Now, the possible answer is that gravity travels as a phase,
while light travels as a ‘bunch’ of waves. Is this the correct
understanding?
A: The gravity wave is merely a “ripple” in the omnipresent fabric;
the
base energy facilitator.
Q: What is a fabric base facilitator?
A: Gravity is the fabric, and energy facilitator as well.
Q: If gravity is the fabric, base and facilitator, what is being
facilitated?
A: You read it wrong. It is base, as in “basic” energy facilitator.
Q: How does gravity facilitate...
(A) What does it facilitate?
A: We have told you before that gravity is the foundational force of
absolutely
everything!!! This means at all density levels, all dimensions...
It is the “stuff” of all existence. Without it, nothing would exist.
Your
thoughts are based in gravity, too!!
Q:
Okay, you said that light is the energy expression of gravity.
How does light manifest at 7th density?
A: Light is seventh density.
Q: Well, so light is 7th density. And you said that light is the
energy expression of gravity. And you said that gravity is God. So,
does this also mean that light is gravity?
A: No.
Q: Okay, what is the distinction between gravity and light?
A: What is the distinction between concrete and cement?
Q: Well, I am not entirely sure. I think cement is a concentrated
stuff and that concrete has sand and rocks and so forth mixed with
it to make it work better. And it has water mixed with it. How does
light manifest on 6th density? Can you give me a relationship?
A: Vague.
Q: Well, I know it’s vague! You say that light is 7th density. You
say that gravity is God, and God and 7th density are the same,
and...
A: No. 7th density is “union with the One.”
Q: What is the distinction between union with the One and God?
A: Only at 7th density is God unified.
Q:
When God ‘disunifies,’ or ‘destabilizes,’ or ‘disperses,’ where,
and I know ‘where’ is not the right term, what density is then
manifested?
A: Wrong concept totally.
Q: What is the RIGHT concept?
A: Well, first of all, God does not destabilize or disperse, for
that matter.
Purge the linear inner concept.
Q: Okay, I am purging. All just simply is. At 7th density there is
union with the One. At 6th density there is... what? An equal
balance of dark and light, or being and non-being, is that correct?
A: Pure consciousness no need to physicalise.
Q: And, I think that there are the 3 ethereal densities, and the 3
material densities, and the middle density, the variable
physical/ethereal density...
A: Close.
Q: And these densities are only distinguishable by virtue of the
nearness to union with the One, is that correct?
A: Nearness?
Q: Well, you know I don’t mean it in a that sense... Help me out
here!
A: No, you are doing just fine.
Q: Now, I am seeing it sort of like the perpendicular reality image.
The
circle in the center, and the outraying perpendicular realities
which go out
and out and out, and eventually come back to the center, because the
gravity in
the center brings them back. Something happens in a concentric
circle sort of
way, or in the idea of the shells of an atom sort
of way, that distinguishes shells, or states of being, in relation
to this
center and these perpendicular realities. What is the level of
shells, the
realm levels, what is the relationship between the perpendicular
reality
and its moving outward that distinguishes it at certain relational
points
from the center itself? I understand that it is consciousness, but
we are also dealing with non-being. Being and non-being. What is the
relationship of these perpendicular realities to the seven realms of
existence?
A: Not essentially correct. Perpendicular reality is
knowledge/awareness/being
matrix. Realms are merely experiential divisions based upon
consciousness energy directors.
Q: What are consciousness energy directors?
A: Compare yourself to your backyard denizen. How do each of you
view
calculus?
Q: Well, I don’t know exactly what calculus is, but I know it is
important. I never thought I was able to learn such things, so I
didn’t try. But, I think it is important, and someday I will know
something about it. I am sure that the dog would not only think it
is not useful, he would not even be aware of it. How does that
relate to consciousness energy directors?
A: All in nature seeks balance. One day, so to speak, “Percy” will
indeed
have an opinion of calculus.
Q: Okay, so consciousness energy directors are like a horizontal
reality in relation to the perpendicular ones?
A: Slots, my dear, slots.
Q: Are these slots comparable to the appearing and disappearing of
electrons in the shells of an atom?
A: Not the point. You are still trying to use 3rd density awareness
to
measure the reality parameters of all other density levels... Talk
about your square peg and your round hole! Tell Arkadiusz to trust
in gravity waves to be merely his pathway to higher understanding,
not the means to an end.
Q: Now you have mentioned these ‘slots.’ What are these slots, and
how does one move from one slot to another?
A: Picture this: you have 7 sizes of marbles. You have 7 widths of
slots.
Where do the marbles “fit in.”
Q: Do the marbles represent units of consciousness?
A: Close. Or, divisions of consciousness level energy resonance
profiles.
Q: Do these divisions of consciousness grow and change?
A: Yes.
Q: And they grow and change through acquiring knowledge, is that
correct?
A: Basically.
Q: And acquiring knowledge is akin to acquiring energy? Or light?
Light energy?
A: Not exactly. That would be like saying that “filling up” at the
gas
station is akin to acquiring speed.
Q: So, knowledge and light are like the gas for the car, but speed
comes from utilization?
A: Yes.
Q: And utilization means...
A: Knowledge application which generates energy, which, in turn,
generates
light.
Q: So, when one of these marbles is in a slot, does it fill up with
gas which then enables it to move to another slot?
A: What!?!
Q: Well, I’m using your analogy!
A: No, you are mixing analogies!
Q: Let me back up then, and regroup. We have marbles in slots...
A: What causes the marbles to go into the slots? Gas?!??
Q: Okay. Where do they get the gas from?
A:
That was an entirely different analogy, used only as a retort to
an
erroneous assumption, nothing more!
Q: Let me back up again. Marbles in slots. What are the slots?
A: An analogy to depict realms for you.
Q:
Do the marbles move from one slot to another?
A: When, and only when, they have acquired the proper fit.
Q: Oh. How do they acquire the proper fit?
A: How do you?
Q: I guess you grow?
A: Okay.
Q: Let me change gears because I am getting in so deep that I don’t
even know which way to go just now. My brain is having trouble
coping. Ark wants to know if the 1925-27 theory is better than the
later attempts?
A: Better in the sense of less political corruption. Coping is only
necessary
when one is not open.
Q: Well, I am open, but I have to sit down and type it out and think
about it to know where to go with it...
A: And what happens when you do this?
Q: Well, I absorb it. And then it leads to other questions. Is that
okay?
A: Okay.
Q: Here is this purported letter from a Carlos Allende to Dr.
Jessup. Now, whether Carlos was a real person or not, what I want to
know is if the information is somewhat accurate? Is it a reliable
source of information?
A: Is that not obvious?
Q: I thought it was. He said that Einstein did computations on
cycles of human civilization and progress, compared to the growth of
man’s general character and development, and that this horrified
him. Now, this is the very thing you suggested I do to find clues.
And, I am doing it. It says here that Einstein was doing the same
thing. Is this correct?
A: Yes.
Q: What horrified him?
A: The discovery of variability of physicality, and all that that
implies,
when one knows all that Einstein knew up to that point.
Q: So, 4th density blew him away!
A: And the other density levels. One begins with the premise that
the
material realm is the “whole shooting match,” discovers it is not,
must rethink everything.
Q: So, it hit Einstein like a ton of bricks. Change gears: Ark has
been having a problem sleeping at night and staying awake in the
office. The building is a number 9, but there is also the Max Planck
Institute across the street. Is it the number 9, or the Max Planck
Institute across the street?
A: Well, we vote for Max!
Q: So, what are they doing over there in that building that is
affecting him?
A: Better question: What are “they” doing on 4th density that is
affecting
him?
Q: Since that is a better question, what ARE they doing on 4th
density that is affecting Ark?
A: Guess.
Q:
Is he being abducted from this building?
A: No.
Q: Are they STS or STO?
A: STS.
Q: Are they zapping him with some kind of frequency modulation?
A: Close.
Q: Why is it more effective in that building than in the basement or
at his hotel?
A: Because of Max.
Q: Okay, they are using whatever is going on in that building to zap
Ark.
Anything else they are doing there?
A: Yes.
Q: Could you tell me what?
A: No.
Q: Is there anything else they are doing to Ark?
A:
Yes.
Q: Can you tell me?
A:
Body chemistry alteration.
Q: In what sense is there body chemistry alteration going on?
A: Brain wave factors.
Q: Is there something he can do for protection?
A: He soon will leave the area.
Q: Well, during the time he is there, how much damage can they do?
A: Probably not much.
Q: Is there any other step he can take other than going to the
library or staying in his hotel?
A: Good idea!
Q: Anything else?
A: One shot of whiskey per day will help.
Q: Well, that is a bizarre thing to say! A shot of whiskey?! That
will help his brain chemistry?
A: Some.
Q: What is this altering of his brain chemistry designed to do?
A: Befuddle.
Q: Well, I think it is working. Any other suggestion? Come on, we
are you in the past! Help us out here!
A: Then you will know in the “future.”
Q: Well, then, since I know in the future, why don’t I tell me in
the past anything else that will help besides staying in the hotel,
or the basement, and drinking a shot of whiskey a day?
A: No need.
Q: And you are not going to tell us what they are doing over there
in the Max Planck Institute?
A: As Carlos Allende would say: “If you knew, you would die of
shock.”
Q: That is NOT friendly! I don’t want to know things that are not
friendly. Now, you have got me so startled that I don’t even know if
the path I am following in researching the history and the other
things is even worthwhile or useful.
A: Oh, you bet it is!!!!!
Q: Is the historical research going to gradually bring me to this
knowledge that would cause me to now ‘die of shock?’
A: Maybe.
Q: In the information I now have on the Canaries, I found that a
strange icon appeared on the island long before the conquest, long
before any missionaries or Europeans arrived. The natives were the
big, blond types. They said that they knew this icon was divine
because following its appearance, there were processions of angels,
or divine beings, up and down the beach where it appeared, lights,
smells, chanting and singing and so forth. How did the statue of the
Virgin of Candelaria arrive on the beach at Tenerife?
A: Teleportation.
Q: Who teleported it there?
A: The “Celts.”
Q: Celts in the sense of the Druids?
A:
Or in the sense of Atlanteans.
Q: Now, you said before that Atlanteans were not Celts, is that
correct?
A: No.
Q: The Atlanteans were Celts?
A: “Celts, Druids,” etc... are merely latter day designations.
Q: Let’s back up here. You said that the Celts came from Kantek.
They were transported by the Lizzies... brought here, correct?
A: Yes.
Q: When the Lizzies did this, how many Celts were physically brought
here?
A: Hundreds of millions.
Q: How long, in our terms, did it take to bring these Celts to this
planet?
Or, is this ongoing?
A: Well, in the sense that you measure it, let us say about a week.
Q: Did they transport them in ships, that is some sort of structure.
That is, did they load them up, move them into 4th density, reemerge
here in 3rd density, or something like that?
A: Close.
Q: And they unloaded them in the area of the Caucasus, is that
correct?
A: And regions surrounding.
Q: And, that was what, 79 to 80 thousand years ago?
A: Over 80,000.
Q: As I understand it, Atlantis was already quite a developed
civilization at that time, is that correct?
A: Yes, but regions change with waves of immigration, or conquest...
witness
your own lands.
Q: You also said once that there was a nuclear war in India and that
this was what was being discussed in the Vedas when it talks about
the ‘blue-skinned’ people who weren’t really blue because they were
Celts, and they were flying in aircraft, and they were engaged in
this war, etc. Who were the Celts at war with?
A: The Paranthas.
Q: Now, wait a minute! Who are the Paranthas?! Do we have a new
player here?
A: Not new.
Q: Do we know them by another name?
A: Choose.
Q: The Atlanteans? Were the Celts of India at war with the
Atlanteans in the Atlantic?
A: Atlantis was merely a home base of an advanced civilisation of 3
races
of humans occupying different sections of a huge Island empire,
which, in itself, underwent 3 incarnations over a 100,000 year
period as you would measure it.
Q: The 3 races were the Celts... and who were the second and third?
A: Or Kantekkians.
Q: Are the Kantekkians different from the Celts?
A: Only in the sense of long term racial and genetic blending.
Q: So, Atlantis had the Kantekkians and who else?
A: Race you would call “Native Americans,” and a third, no longer
existing
race, somewhat resembling Australian or Guinean aborigines, only
lighter in complexion.
Q: Was this third group destroyed by the other two?
A: One of the 3 cataclysms.
Q: Paranthas. Who were the Paranthas?
A: Nation of race mentioned above.
Q: So, the Paranthas were the antecedents of the Abos of Australia?
A: Yes, and compare to now existing peoples of India, Pakistan, Sri
Lanka,
Australia, and New Guinea for similarities, bearing in mind genetic
mixing and dilution.
Q: Were the Vedas written by the Paranthas or written by the Celts?
A: Descendants of Parantha, as per “Divine guidance.”
Q: That explains a LOT. I was just thinking about it the other day.
If these people in India are related to the Celts, as philologists
would have us believe due to language roots, there is no way I can
understand this because they are simply NOTHING like them in any
way. Come on! We are talking about a race that is subservient and
sly and obsequious - just NOTHING like the Celts. So bizarrely
different! Okay, I think that you said that this nuclear war
happened something like 50,000 years ago. We have taken care of a
couple of points; we have 3 races on Atlantis, Celts all over the
place... did the Celts conquer the Atlanteans?
A: No.
Q: Did they just move in and hang out?
A: They took over the Northern section.
Q: At the same time, there were Celts in the Caucasus, along the
Baltic, in Ireland, England and Europe...
A: Ireland, England, etc. was later.
Q: But there were in the Norse lands, as Sweden, Norway and Denmark,
they were along the Baltic, and they were in the Caucasus?
A:
Some above mentioned areas were ice covered.
Q:
When the philologists track the language roots, they arrive at
the Kurgan region, north and west of the Caucasus. Is that where the
Celts went when Atlantis was destroyed?
A: Close.
Q: Were the Celts the tall blonds known as the ‘Sons of Anak,’ who
ruled over the Sumerians as described by Sitchen?
A: “Celts” are what remains of the original prototype.
Q: Okay. Kantekkians. When did...
A: Gravity differences account for the height difference
Q: When did the Kantekkians, or Celts or whatever arrive on the
Canary Islands?
A: 12,000 years ago.
Q: Did they arrive there from Atlantis directly?
A: Close.
Q: Where from?
A: Confused by trauma.
Q: What does that mean?
A: Guess.
Q: Did they come from underground?
A: Some.
Q: Were they part of the underground race?
A: No Laura. What “trauma” do you think we are referring to??
Q: The comet cluster? The Flood of Noah?
A:
Close enough.
Q: When did the Celts or Kantekkians first take up residence in the
British Isles?
A: Same. 12,000 years ago.
Q:
Were the Picts also Celts?
A: No, Atlantean. Remember, “Celt” is latter day moniker.
Q: Were the Picts Kantekkians?
A: Originally.
Q: Was Abraham a Kantekkian? Was the story of Abraham the story of
the Kantekkians being brought to Earth?
A: No.
Q: Was Abraham a Kantekkian or a derivation?
A:
Latter. But, so are you.
Q: Were the Jews that were genetically engineered and then planted
in the Middle East... what year was this?
A: 130,000 years ago.
Q: Good grief! Have they managed to retain any racial purity for
that long?
A: No.
Q: Cayce talks about the division in Atlantis between the “Sons of
One” and the “Sons of Belial.” Was this a racial division or a
philosophical/ religious division?
A: It was the latter two, and before that, the former one.
Q: When it was a racial division, which group was it?
A: The Sons of Belial were the Kantekkians.
Q: Well! That is not good!
A: Subjective... you are not bodies, you are souls.
Q: You said that there is a group with whom you have been in contact
since they were on Kantek. Is this group the Druids?
A: No. We will not as of yet identify.
Q: Well, I came to the conclusion that the Rosicrucians are just the
new incarnation of the Druids. I mean, the Druids disappeared and
the Rosicrucians appeared not too long afterward.
A: Partially.
Q: Julius Caesar had a standard policy of religious toleration. The
only
exception seems to have been the Druids. He was determined to stamp
them out.
Why?
A: Their mysterious powers.
Q: Where did they get these mysterious powers?
A:
Knowledge passed down.
Q: Were the ‘angelic beings’ that appeared on the Canaries Druids or
Rosicrucians?
A: They were 4th density.
Q: Were they STS of STO?
A: Both.
Q: Do the STS and STO hang out together?
A: Do you hang out with all types of your realm?
Q: Well, in these processions of beings that the Guanches of the
island saw, were they STS or STO?
A: Both.
Q:
You mean they would see one and then another?
A: Close.
Q: Okay, something that has been bothering me: the Celtic/Kantekkian
propensity for head hunting. There are several explanations offered
for this, but none of them really makes sense to me. It is almost
like a genetic thing for them to cut off heads of their enemies and
heroes...
A: Why do you clasp hands?
Q: When you meet someone?
A: No. We mean in prayer.
Q: Oh, my! You mean they cut off heads to accrue negative energy to
themselves? Power?
A: Foundationally.
Q: So, it is really kind of like that show on television: “The
Highlander.”
Is that what you mean?
A: Research for answer. And, on that note...
Q: But I have more questions! I’m not done yet!
A: Good Night...
End of Session
Back to Contents
|