October 23, 1999
Q: Hello. A: Hello.
Q: And who do we have with us this evening?
A: Eggoram.
Q: And where do you transmit through?
A: Cassiopaea.
Q: I want to you have lost a fan because he was not happy with what
he considered to be “internal inconsistencies” in that you were NOT
favorably disposed toward hallucinations produced by substances such
as Mescaline and Ayahuasca, but yet you recommend Melatonin because
it is a hallucinogen. Then, you said that spiritual powers could not
be obtained through chemicals or plant type means, but then said
that Melatonin exercises psychic abilities. Could you comment on
this? A: Several comments: First of all, “fan” is short for “fanatic.”
Secondly,
melatonin does not force an alteration in physiological brain
chemicals, as do mescaline, peyote, LSD, etc. Accessing the higher
levels of psychical awareness through such processes is harmful to
the balance levels of the prime chakra. This is because it alters
the natural rhythms of psychic development by causing reliance on
the part of the subject, thus subjugating the learning process. It
is a form of self-imposed abridging of free will. Melatonin simply
allows the system to clear obstructions in the brain chemistry
naturally, thereby allowing the subject to continue to learn at a
natural pace. And, it is by no means unimportant that melatonin is a
natural body hormone. The other substances mentioned are, at least
in part, synthetic, with the exception of peyote. But even that is
not a natural ingredient of the human physiological being. And
besides, we have already discussed the importance, or lack thereof,
of those who pass judgment upon this exercise, or communication.
Q: Okay. Going in another direction, we have just recently learned
that there
is a fellow named Randell Mills who claims to have discovered or
written the Grand Unified Field Theory. Is this in fact, true?
A: If he has, where is the evidence?
Q: We ordered the book! A hundred bucks, too! It’s on its way as we
speak! A: Theories must be successfully tested to be valid according to
your
scientific convention. Otherwise, they are merely hypotheses, and
anyone can do that, for 100 dollars a pop, we might add.
Q:
Well, he does seem to have a lot of support... A: support is not confirmation. A completed, valid Unified Field
Theory does
indeed exist among 3rd density STS, but it is held in the strictest
secrecy!
Q: Along that line, Ark is getting really sick of
programming. He has put in his CV in dozen or so places, but there
are a lot of places he can’t work because he isn’t a citizen yet.
A: Citizenship can be expedited, explore at once.
Q: Is there something else we can explore at once regarding
employment so he doesn’t have to do this programming. Working as a
physicist would be nice. A: Yes, but it may also be limiting, though in a different way.
Q: Do you have any suggestions? A: There are many such opportunities in the area.
Q: Well, give us a couple of words to focus our search?
A: Interstate 4.
Q: Don’t hang up on us here now! This is serious!
A: Where have you looked?
Q: In all the obvious places, of course. Lockheed, NASA,
universities, etc. (A) Okay, I was advised to contact this Phipps,
and we had an exchange, but he was not able to explain one thing
that I was asking. Finally he gave up and said that it would be the
end of our communication because he wanted to have his “private
life,” and he apologized for his errors! The question is, of course,
whether there is anything of value, and how to find it, in this work
of Phipps. This contact with Phipps was unsatisfactory. He couldn’t
answer questions, wouldn’t answer questions; there are several
possibilities here: one is that what he was writing was crap.
A: When one confronts one of a “showman’s” nature, it usually ends
in frustration. Sometimes, someone near them is able to offer more
concrete answers.
Q: (A) Yet, I was advised to contact this guy by you!
A: Yes, because sometimes the trail leads to paydirt, even if not
immediately.
Remember, this is a puzzle, not a roadmap.
Q: Well, maybe something WILL result from this contact and
conversation. Maybe the comments you have made will be read by
someone else. You just never know. (A) Yes, it’s a puzzle. But, this
Phipps presents Maxwell Equations with extra terms, which probably
is wrong, but there may be something to this. It may show the way.
My hypothesis is that what he has said about Maxwell Equations is
wrong, but it shows a way toward something that can work. Is this
correct?
A: Yes.
Q: We learned that Leedskalnin supposedly wrote a book back in 1949.
(F) He did? I bet he didn’t reveal his secrets! (L) No, but it is
interesting anyway. We ordered it. We read parts of it from the
internet, and it is written in rather archaic language, or he had
some problems explaining things in English, but it is about basic
principles he was investigating. We want to play with some of his
experiments at some point. (F) Is there anything about spinning? (L)
No, but I figured out what the airplane seat was for by reading some
of his experiments. (A) Is there any experiment in this book that
would show us the way toward UFT, or better, a way out of standard
physics? Or, are his experiments just standard things, but since he
did not know the laws of physics, he may have misinterpreted his
results? He was amazed by the behavior of magnets, but the
experiments were standard? Well, we will have to see. I wrote to
this anti-gravity group and asked them if there was one, just one,
repeatable experiment that I can do myself, which cannot be
explained by standard theories. Is there one? A: Is there such an experiment, yes. But one needs the necessary
equipment,
and that is difficult to come by. One needs the means to supply the
adequate power for an artificially created EM field.
Q:
(A) But that would mean that what is in this book by Leedskalnin
is just normal experiments because, for the most part, they just use
car batteries.
A: More power than that is needed, because the grid
is too weak for substantive results.
Q: (A) But, when he was building this Coral Castle, apparently he
was using such effects! What power was he using? A: Sound waves.
Q: (A) How was he producing these sound waves?
A: Through correlation of rocks and power source, obtained
“illegally.” Instrument was similar to a tuning fork, but energized
to a level that was lethal if one were to come in contact with it,
or its ground.
Q: (A) Have we been discouraged from experimenting
here? A: No.
Q: (L) Did he use this tuning fork while sitting in his suspended
swing? A: Yes, because to do otherwise would have been fatal!.
Q: (L) Where did he illegally obtain this power source?
A: Tapped into high energy power lines.
Q:
(L) So, he was an energy pirate! But, that certainly makes it
less mysterious!
(A) Can we obtain the necessary equipment? I know
what we need.
A: Be careful.
Q:
(L) No kidding! I don’t want to vaporize! (A) We will experiment
on Percy. (L) No! Not the poor doggie! (A) I have one more question.
I want to ask about time. We have been told several times that time
is subjective, time does not exist. On the other hand, we are told
again and again about electromagnetic phenomena. Now, the problem
is, electromagnetism is governed by Maxwell Equations, and you have
to write Maxwell Equations with time as one of the variables because
it is all about how EM fields propagate in time. I am totally
confused. I don’t know how to do EM theory without time. I haven’t
the slightest idea. And, this silly Phipps, wanted to replace time,
and he advocates something that he calls “proper time.” Proper time
is something that is an individual time rather than a universal time
that is inclusive of everyone; so there is this proper time that is
individual; every particle has its own time. I want to know how to
do physics without time. At least how to start. Or electromagnetism
without time. Maxwell equations are about time. Einstein’s
relativity is about space AND time. How to do physics without time?
A: So many questions, on at a “time,” please.
Q: (A) Can equations of electromagnetism be written without using
time as we use it? A: Yes.
Q: Should we discard this time that is in the present equation
altogether, or replace it by something else? A: Reinterpret. It is subjective, therefore fluid, or variable. In
other words, open to many interpretations.
Q: (A) I want to ask about the theory that I developed with
Blanchard that was recently criticized by a third referee of a
journal. The paper was rejected. Essentially, the referee was, in a
sense, partly right. I am not completely convinced that what we have
done is going in the right direction. I spent on this ten years
going in a certain direction, but then the development has stopped.
The problem is that I don’t understand Quantum Theory. Trying to
understand Quantum Theory, we developed this theory in which part of
the world is classical and part of the world is quantum. But, of
course, we don’t know which part of the world is classical. Stapp
was thinking that it was mind, consciousness; Penrose thinks it is
gravity. The question is: is this theory that we were developing
with Blanchard, for ten years or even more, is it a step forward, or
is it just crap like this Phipps produced? Can it be made a step
forward by completing it? A: Yes.
Q: Okay, if it can be a step forward, the main question that we
don’t know the
answer to is: what is classical? Gravity or consciousness or
something else?
What? Or, perhaps everything is classical... A: Classical negates consciousness, regarding the mind as merely a
function of
chemical functions and electrical impulses occurring within a
vacuum, rather than being interfaced with the rest of creation at
all levels of density and all dimensions, which is of course, the
case. Gravity is the “glue which binds all aspects of reality,
physical and ethereal. Nothing would exist without consciousness to
perceive it. Classical physics assumes, among other things, that
consciousness and “the brain” are one and the same, or that one
exclusively facilitates the other. In actuality, the brain is merely
that conduit which facilitates conscious expression in the physical
state of human 3rd density states and similar manifestations.
Q: (L) I would like to ask a sort of general question: since we have
this website and a fairly good amount of visitation, but it has
become sort of a forum, so to speak. Most of the basic concepts are
on the website. I am little by little getting other things up; most
of it is already in the transcripts; but once in awhile there is
expansion needed, such as the subject of hallucinogens this evening;
but, for the most part, the pretty basic things are there and are
being discussed. My question is: is there a particularly fruitful
direction that these sessions ought to take from this point on?
A: Just let them flow, as always.
Q: (L) I seem to be lacking a particular element in my diet, but I
am not sure what it is. Can you tell what it is and the best source
to get it? A: What is the problem that makes you believe there is a lacking?
Q: (L) I have this irregular system and I believe I have a hormone
problem. A: What sort?
Q: (L) Just what I said. Irregular. That’s as specific as I want to
get! A: Calcium, potassium is a little off balance. And you are prone to
experimentation based on impatience.
Q: I want to ask a secret question.
A: No. Share with forum.
Q: I can’t! It’s a personal question!
A: You have the ability to receive answers to such inquiries in an
equally
“personal communication.”
Q: (A) About the programming, I can do it as long as I am well paid.
But, in a university, you have access to journals and books and so
forth. But, maybe I don’t need it. (L) Is the job situation stable?
A: It is stable, if tedious.
Q: It’s certainly that. Good night.
A: Good night.
End of Session
Back to Contents
November 13, 1999
We have a lot of questions to get through tonight, and I have sort
of organized them so that the ones that will go quickly are in the
top of the pile; but we know how THAT goes! Could be a BIG mistake!
We could be here all night on just one of them! Okay....
Q: Hello. A: Hello.
Q: And who do we have with us this evening?
A: Fogorrh.
Q: And where do you transmit through?
A: Cassiopaea.
Q: The first question we have here is from a correspondent who asks:
“Have the
Cassiopaeans ever mentioned the significance of numbers?” She was
particularly
interested in the number 666, and I answered that there was already
some discussion of this on the website. I also mentioned that there
is some good material on the subject that I have not posted yet
because I have not gotten to that yet. But, she did ask a couple of
questions that we had not covered before, so I wanted to get them in
here. She asks about this “magic square of the sun.” Does this have
any deep symbolic meaning? A: Mathematics is organized such that one can construct what one
wishes.
Q: Are you saying that Professor Eco was correct when he wrote:
“With numbers you can do anything you like... I believe the universe
is a great symphony of numerical correspondences...” and that the
works of man “reproduce in their structures, unconsciously, the
harmonies of the cosmos. ...If there is a secret, it is much more
profound...” and that those who write about such things remain
simply on the surface, “discovering with their incredibly tortuous
methods a straightforward truth. ...The true initiate knows that
these are metaphors, masks, conventional lies or, at most, pathetic
surrogates, for an ancestral forgotten force.” A: Yes.
Q: Okay. Then it’s a good thing that it’s Greek to both of us! Next,
she heard something along this line and asked: “Do crop circles use
geometry and gematria to send us messages? A: Messages? Yes. Geometry and “geometria? If one so desires.
Q: Okay. I think we can use our brains to figure out the rest of it.
Next question; a reader writes: “In Scientology, man is viewed as a
composite entity comprised of one being, supposed hopefully to be
“in charge,” and an enormous number of separate entities in various
states of consciousness/unconsciousness, not completely dissimilar
to the description given in Ouspensky’s “In Search of the
Miraculous.” One of the critical differences between what the
Cassiopaeans are saying and what is given as fact in Scientology is
that, in Scientology, one is taught that one is not ultimately One,
that an individual remains an individual to the upper reaches of
evolution, and evolves as a “god.” A: The Grand Pulsation makes individuality a temporary state of
being.
Q: By saying that the Grand Pulsation is only a temporary state of
individuation, this means that all are One and return to the state
of Oneness. A: Yes. If so, it is always true. All are ultimately “god.”
Q: But they don’t evolve as a god by remaining individual in the
upper reaches of evolution? A: What would be the purpose?
Q: I guess they are hung up on remaining individuals and becoming as
“gods” for power and control issues... sort of ultimate STS. A:
Maybe that would work if time and linear reality were correct,
but...
Q: Next question, and I think this one will be quick: can you make
any comments on the likelihood of this Y2K situation getting out of
hand and bringing on the “New World Order” or causing the
institution of Martial Law, or causing people to need to store food,
guns, ammunition and take all their money out of the bank? There is
an AWFUL lot of hysteria out there about this... A: Ask them what happened on November 7th.
Q: Oh, you mean the big Hoagland prediction that something was going
to strike the earth... supposedly revealed to him by a “confidential
informant” who somehow proved his “reliability,” by having “inside
information” and so forth. In other words, another spate of
disinformation? A: Yup!
Q: Okay. Another reader asks what really happened to Flight 990?
A: Pilots lost control when wind burst tipped plane. Autopilot was
disengaged
after beginning of dive. Centrifugal force prevented soon enough
correction in attitude to prevent structural damage to wings and
struts. When plane was re-ascending, stresses sheared off right wing.
No radio contact was made due to the desperation of the situation
requiring all attention of the flight crew.
Q: Did you mean
“altitude?” A: We meant “attitude.”
Q: So there was really nothing mysterious about the crash of Flight
990. A: Mysteries are subjective.
Q: Were there any mysterious personages aboard this plane, such as
persons involved in the “HOR project” in Egypt? A: Probably not. But even if so, do some of your correspondents
think
everything is a conspiracy!?!
Q: Yes. Some of them do! Next question; a correspondent writes: I am
wondering if you could ask the Cassiopaeans about the ORIGIN of the
TAROT CARDS. Do they represent the esoteric knowledge that the god
Thoth - an Atlantean High Priest - wanted saved at the time of the
sinking of Atlantis? A: No.
Q: What do Tarot cards represent?
A: A method for sensitives to tune in with. Or for less psychically
endowed
persons to “play” with.
Q: Were they carved by the god Thoth on transparent crystal tablets
according to principles of sacred geometry? A: If so, why did Thoth not get a “copyright?”
Q: So, they were not carved on transparent crystal tablets?
A: No.
Q: Did the Atlantean high priests bring them to Egypt?
A: No.
Q: Did they come from the Druids?
A: No.
Q: Who invented them? A:
Greek origin, refined in Roman times in France.
Q:
Well, I guess that takes care of that! Now, there is a rather
desperate couple of letters from a correspondent who writes: “about
5 years ago , I had a reading from a very good trance channel. The
female voice that came in said I was from Andromeda and she was my
Tracker. She explained my lineage and evolvement there. She also
said I had been to many ascending planets. I assumed that what I did
was assist in that process.; she did not say that. I have now
enrolled in that spiritual school of ascension. They say that I am
an information broker. That means that I have unconscious agreements
to provide ascension information to Andromeda. That does not sound
bad, it sounds like service. It’s not. It keeps me from ascending.
It also creates karma for me , because I have been instrumental in
taking other people’s information without them knowing it. I need
information on this phenomenon. I hope you will help me. No one
knows how to break the contract effectively. The school says that
the Andromedans have engineered thier ascension. is this true? I
wish to cancel my contract and get my information back, how can I do
that? Information brokering is causing those involved to not ascend
, even when they do not consciously know it. Can the Andromedans not
read the information without depleteing our ascension gridwork? We
ask that something be changed so that we ar e not depleted. We ask
the Cassiopaeans to assist. This is a call to assist in returni ng
information and canceling contracts. that affect our information.
All help will be appreciated. I do not have a clue about which
Andromedans are involved. “ This lady wrote in an earlier letter
that this “School of Ascension” was run by folks who call themselves
“Lord and Lady Agape and Lord and Lady Athena.” Aside from the fact
that this sounds an awful lot like that Circe nonsense, I thought
you might address this directly, aside from the fact that the only
contract I can see that needs to be cancelled is the one to pay any
money to attend this “school.” A: Dabbling in such nonsense is not necessary for one to ascend. Two
more
comments: in this case, a “good trance channel” is defined as one
which tells the client that which the client wishes to hear. Comment
two: What?! No “godsparks?”
[This is a humorous reference to another
“psychic” of which we are aware, who was assigning “godspark levels”
to her clients in a completely nonsensical cosmology designed to
separate the client from their money and make them feel important]
Q: Here is a guy who asks: “do you know about the ‘Revelation of the
Method?’” A: What method?
Q: Good question. (A) I would like to know how we should respond to
the
Fundamentalists who write and threaten us? A: Best approach is to not respond.
Q: Next question, or series of questions; this correspondent wrote
on our
Discussion Page: “If the Cassiopeans are correct in that Humans came
from the
7th density via Lucifer/the fall, why did they choose this? If we
came from 7th density we would be aware of the knowledge of the
Cassiopeans and more, and as time has no meaning above the 3rd
density, then we would have known what would happen to us, including
the takeover by the STS group. This can be explained by the Grand
Cycle, as we would have known that we would need to do this, but
then where is free will? It would seem as though we are caught in an
endless loop, which is ultimately futile. On the other hand, if
there is free will then, as time does not exist, we should not even
be here as all would have happened in an instant as everything
progressed to 7th density in a single moment of thought! Since this
does not appear to have happened, then everything must in fact be
changing continuously. 7th density is union with the One, as stated
by the Cassiopaeans. This would equate to the ultimate expression of
our existence, as we were, are and will be there. Why leave? As this
requires an orientation to STO, then our decision to leave could
only be a benefit to all, as opposed to being “cast out” for the
desire for physicality. To me, this can express an attempt to go
beyond 7th density! Why leave unless there was an something more to
be learned in this existence! But what could that possibly be! The
Cassiopeans, who claim to be what we were/are/will be, perhaps could
shed some light on this subject. Another possibility is that we are
attempting to change the Lizzies by letting them change us! As much
as they have given us their brain, they are taking samples of us to
incorporate into the Greys and possibly themselves. Hard to get more
Machiavellian than that! Last thought. If we at 7th density did make
a mistake by coming down to 3rd density, then couldn’t the
Cassiopeans, at 6th, be just as prone to error? The reason I have
gone into these lines of thought are that I want to understand a bit
of the BIG picture. Understanding motives goes a long way to
understanding our world/reality. I would like to try to understand
our motives for being here, as has been pointed out, knowledge is
all and we are ultimately in charge of our own destinies regardless
of whatever influences there are. I admit I would like to ascribe
some higher motives to our presence here out of ego, but wouldn’t it
make more sense as well?” I suppose you want me to break this down
into questions? A: Yes we do.
Q: Okay. If humans came from 7th density via the “Fall,” why did
they choose this? A: Not choice in a sense as understood by 3rd density STS.
Q: If we came from 7th density we would be aware of the knowledge of
the
Cassiopeans and more, and as time has no meaning above the 3rd
density, then we would have known what would happen to us, including
the takeover by the STS group. A: Who said that humans descended from 7th density?
Q: Well, you said that human beings are a “fragmented soul unit”
that, before
they came into the bodies here on earth were “In Union with the
One.” And, Union with the One is 7th density as you have so often
said. A: We have also said the the end is the beginning and vice versa.
Q: It would seem as though we are caught in an endless loop, which
is
ultimately futile. A: It would seem that way if one is transposing 3rd density linear
thought from
a physicalized standpoint upon that which is infinitely more
complex.
Q: On the other hand, if there is free will then, as time does not
exist, we
should not even be here as all would have happened in an instant as
everything progressed to 7th density in a single moment of thought!
A: See previous answer.
Q: The reason I have gone into these lines of thought are that I
want to
understand a bit of the BIG picture. Understanding motives goes a
long way to
understanding our world/reality. I would like to try to understand
our motives
for being here. So, he wants the big picture: why are we here? Why
does
ANYTHING exist? A: This cannot be understood from your perspective. But no need.
Patience,
please. Lessons are learned sequentially. And, of course we can make
errors.
After all, we are still learning too, Ken!
Q: Now, here is this: You probably know I have been in
correspondence with
your husband regarding a way to apply his theories about the
possibility of time travel. He has withdrawn any support on the
grounds that there may be one chance in 10,000 that to do so would
violate free will. I can’t speak for Karen and she can no longer
speak to me. I only know what she said while she was here. The last
three months were very bad, and if she refused to stay here on the
day she died, I would understand. But it is farther in the past
which I want to change. I want to give her 5 to 10 years with one of
my kidneys instead of less than two years dying on a machine. I
cannot speak to her anymore, but perhaps you can. . Her name in this
life was Karen Claudia Scarborough. Ask her if she could undo the
transfusion and receive Gary’s kidney, would she want to try again?
If you can reach her, please give her this message: The Cassiopaeans said that time is selective and variable. I do not
want to win a lottery or cure cancer or become rich and famous.
Someone I love had a dream about creating a life where she could run
a small art shop and be happy and successful. It was a small dream
but she didn’t think she could ever realize because she had a
psychiatric problem she didn’t understand. The problem was never
completely resolved, but enough so that she could try to make her
dream come true. The last two years of her life were the only ones
that she said were happy. Nothing in my life gave me as much
happiness as helping her build her dream. I don’t want all that
much, just a little more time for love. Please ask the Cassiopaens
if developing a technology to allow humans to experience time as
selective and variable is violating anyone’s free will. The
channeling you received say it is a natural function that is blocked
by our illusions. I don’t see how free will relates to that. Please ask Karen what she wants.
A: Now, as for this person: does he not understand? It is the soul
that
matters, not the body!!!
Q: Yes, but he has lost his perspective in his grief. He wants to
deliver
this message to Karen: “Karen, I know now that I should not have
been so focused on storage and generators at our place in the country. It
was my form of denial. I could create a place where we could survive
even if the world crumbled around us for as long as we had fluid for
your machine. What I couldn’t face was that the machine was no
longer working. Every week, your blood sugar swings got wider and
you lost a little more function. Instead of creating our retreat
because it was something I could do, I should have spent every
moment with you. I should have been doing what I can do no longer,
holding you in my arms and telling you how much I love you. I have
all the time I need now to prepare for the future but all my hopes
and dreams for that future died with you. I’m so sorry, sweetheart.
Please forgive me.” A: Karen is at 5th density. Her soul energy understands what is
germane. If
forgiveness is warranted, it is given. This person is obviously
comfortable with STS reality.
Q: Is developing a technology to allow humans to experience time as
selective
and variable violating anyone’s free will? A: Depends on how it is
utilized.
Q: Would it be violating Karen’s free will to go back and try to
prevent her
death? A: It would also be impossible.
Q: Why would it be impossible? Technologically impossible? Or, was
it that
she had chosen to die no matter what for karmic reasons that we
aren’t aware of? A: More complex than that, but closer to the latter.
Q: Well, I would like to tell this person just one thing that would
help him to feel some peace and to understand a little better...
but, he is so deep in his grief, I don’t think he CAN understand
anything but that... A: You got it!
Q: Any other comment?
A: No.
Q: He wants me to ask Karen what she wants.
A: This is not 5th density “love connection.”
Q: Okay, now this next correspondent writes: “I decided to listen to
one of the C’s suggestions about Melatonin. What the heck, after all
I might meet Santa! Curiously, It was rather hard to find it in our
stores. It turns out that only a herbal/natural version of it is
allowed for sale but I don’t think that it’s any different. Well, I
must say it is all that I ever thought it would be. I have gone
through the stages described in your transcripts and now am at a
rather odd stage where everything seems like a TV broadcast Last
night I had a very unusual dream about an asteroid impacting Earth.
I must say, I do not necessarily subscribe to this theory. I have
been reading A LOT about this so it could be my subconscious mind
playing tricks on me. The impact took place in the vicinity of the
north pole with the approach path from the south. But there was this
curious red line extending up and over the pole after it had taken
place. I don’t know what it meant. Before, I also dreamt about there
only being one more pope, the Japanese being involved with the Grays
and I had some dreams with religious connotations. But what really
blew me away was a dream couple of nights ago. I dream that I was
lifting up from my bed, through the chimney (which I do not have)
into a space ship! I could actually see myself lifting off the bed.
Then I was on some sort of a raised surface with a short BEING with
long arms and A HUMAN DOCTOR beside me. The little fellow seemed
rather upset and tried to calm me down even though I was at peace,
waving his arms to stop doing something. Then the doctor tried to do
something to my lower back but I woke up. Now get this - I woke up
turned around - with my feet on my pillows, on my back which I
rarely do. When I got up, I actually noticed that the sheets weren’t
messed up at all - when I toss in my sleep, the sheets are always
kicked off half of the bed. I don’t know what happened, I know it
sounds suspicious but I am very skeptical. In my case it is probably
more of a wishful thinking than anything else. Regardless of what
had taken place, this particular hormone resulted in a lot of
research material.” I want to ask about this dream that our friend
had under the influence of melatonin. There has been something of a
controversy about it recently as one group claims that melatonin is
stimulated in the brain by aliens in order to cause the paralysis
that overcomes the victim and thereby enables them to go about their
nefarious abducting activity. Is that, in fact, the case? Is
melatonin part of the paralysis factor of alien abduction? A:
No.
Q: What chemicals are stimulated in the body to cause this
paralysis? A: That is not the method used.
Q:
What IS the method used? A: Electronic wave diversion.
Q: They are diverting the electronic waves of our brain or our
physiology? A: Closer.
Q: Okay, what about our friend’s dream; was this a memory, a dream
or an abduction? A: Etheric body abduction.
Q:
What was the purpose of abducting his etheric body? A:
Study.
Q: Who abducted his etheric body?
A: Orion STS. Melatonin only serves to make one more aware of
processes in
this context.
Q: So, lots of people are being abducted, physically, etherically,
or in other ways, and simply are not aware of it at all? A:
More often etherically.
Q: Most abductions are etheric, but people are not aware. The
melatonin is
what enables them to be aware of what is happening by removing the
blocks the aliens put in place? A: Precisely.
Q:
And, by becoming aware, do they have some chance of stopping the
abduction
process by their awareness? A: Or more importantly, limiting the damage. Knowledge protects.
Q: Well, that’s bizarre. Now, our friend also writes: “I’d like to
mention one
more thought that I had the other day. Actually, it occurred to me
while watching a trailer for “Cliffhanger”. In that trailer Stallone
was jumping out of the frozen pool of water with heaps of ice flying
up in the air. At that point, I thought about the different states
of energy. Ice is frozen water. From what I remember of my physics
classes, freezing is like taking kinetic energy out of vibrating
particles. The absolute zero is when the particles stop vibrating at
all. Now, vapor goes the other way round - the extra kinetic energy
is added and the particles escape their gravitational bounds turning
into steam. Well, what if the ascension is like adding some extra
energy. The the gravitational or other boundaries become meaningless
since each individual vibrates on a higher level. What if you keep
increasing the energy levels and the vibration is so rapid that you
cannot be located - you are basically EVERYWHERE at any given point
in “time” - the differences between the individual particles
disappear and you become ONE/UNIFIED. Now, WHAT IF THAT ENERGY IS
KNOWLEDGE?? The more knowledge you add, the more energetic your soul
becomes.” Is this going in the right direction? Is knowledge energy
or is energy knowledge? When you add knowledge, do you have more
energy? A: Energy is a component of knowledge, yes.
Q: Okay, now I was reading in this book that told that many secrets
were hidden
in the mystery of the Egyptian cat worship. I looked it up and found
that this first sacred cat, the goddess Bastet, appeared sitting
under a “Persea Tree.” What is this Persea Tree? A: The tree refers to the afterlife, as envisioned by the Egyptians.
Felines
were thought to be psychic, thus the connection to the afterlife,
which was revered in the Nile Basin.
Q: Who were the Levites?
A: Sect of monklike pacifists. Connected to Moses.
Q: Well, that doesn’t make a lot of sense. They sure did a lot of
warmongering
and they were behind all the rules and regulations that the Jews
followed and that was behind the orders to massacre entire races of.
That doesn’t seem to make sense at all! A: Oh yes it does. Pacifists can be managers, not slaves.
Q: What about this magazine in India that wants to put the
Cassiopaeans on the
cover? Should we get out our sheets and paint dots on our foreheads?
A: Not likely. No sheets, no dots!
Q: Now, as you know, Richard Hoagland and others had this big thing
going about
something that was going to impact the planet. It didn’t.
Nevertheless, these folks and their ilk now have a new circus going
on, including rumors about the HOR in Egypt and so on. Are there any
upcoming situations that we should be aware of? Is there anything in
particular that we need to pay attention to? There is so much going
on with these earthquakes and so on... it’s pretty busy out there!
A: Just watch and learn. We do not like the notion of joining the
prognosticator soup! And on that note, good night.
End of Session
Back to Contents
December 4, 1999
Q: Hello. A: Hello.
Q: And who do we have with us this evening?
A: Laopinnah.
Q: And where do you transmit through?
A: Cassiopaea.
Q: We have a number of issues to deal with this evening; the first
one is the
subject of Flight 990. There have been a number of scenarios
suggested by the media and other sources on the internet. One of
them says that the autopilot was disengaged BEFORE the plane began
to dive. Is this the case? A: No. Plane was disturbed from flight path by windburst, therefore,
autopilot
was disengaged in order to better combat problem.
Q: There has been a big controversy going on. One of the
contributors to this
controversy was Ed Dames who, on the Art Bell show, claimed that his
organization “remote viewed” the situation and that there had been a
fight in the cockpit. This claim was made, I believe, before the
flight data recorders were retrieved. So, this was a scenario that
the media picked up. Then, after one of the recorders was found, for
a short while, this idea was popular, because it seemed to explain
the crazy behavior of the aircraft. But then the voice recorder was
found, and there was no real evidence to support the “fight”
scenario, but there was a sort of prayerful exclamation heard, being
made by the co-pilot who was, apparently alone in the cockpit when
the activity began. Then, the pilot returned and there were sounds
of desperate activity and so forth, so the next scenario proposed
was that the co-pilot had decided to commit suicide in a big way. As
a result of this Ed Dames episode on Art Bell, followed by the NTSB
and FBI trying to fit the clues to Dames’ scenario, there is now the
suggestion making the rounds of the internet rumor mongers that Ed
Dames is in the employ of the “powers that be,” and that he
deliberately planted this story so that they could then come along
and validate it to give him more credibility so that he would be in
place to plant more and greater rumors and stories of the
disinformation variety. Is that the case? Did Ed Dames and his group
accurately remote view the cockpit of Flight 990? A: No. Ed was hoping for a “hit.”
Q: So, Ed Dames is NOT in the employ of the “Powers that be?”
A: No.
Q: Was the co-pilot suicidal?
A: No.
Q: So, what he said was the equivalent of “Oh my God!” or something?
A: Close.
Q: Now, I have another correspondent who was on a beach about a
hundred miles
west of the crash site. This individual was with a companion and
they both saw an orange glow in the direction of the crash at
approximately the time of the event. This orange glow was, in her
opinion, anomalous, and quickly disappeared. Was what was seen by my
correspondent an effect of this plane crash? A: Possibly linked, but not likely.
Q: Well, the question now comes about the nature of the “wind
burst.”
You
previously said about this that “mysteries are subjective.” Did you
mean to imply that we could have or should have followed up with
questions about the wind burst itself? A: No, these things happen. Sometimes a fault in autopilot analog
computer
causes system to fail to adjust properly, thus causing an attitude
aberration in wingtips. Planes can dive suddenly and inexplicably.
Refer to April 1979, Flint Michigan, TWA flight nonstop from New
York to Minneapolis. Quick pilot reaction saved that one, but it was
close, very close! Included same “g-force” anomalies, i.e.
passengers floating out of their seats, etc. Suggest you look this
up on internet. Aircraft manufacturers jealously protect their
“turf.” 1999 incident involved Boeing 767, 1979 incident was a 727.
At root is the fact that Boeing is feeling Airbus Industry Inc.
nipping at its heels. It is all that 3rd density STS love of money
stuff, you know!
Q: (A) Well, about this wind burst, was there some dimensional
phenomenon or
trans-density window as we have suggested on our site? (L) Was it an
ordinary wind burst? I think I have heard that it is impossible to have a
wind burst at
that altitude. A: Not “ordinary,” but not trans-density, or dimensional. It was a
Jetstream
“eddy.”
Q: So, there were no rays, beams, microwaves, trans-density or
dimensional windows, weird, anomalous, conspiratorial event going on here?
A: No, no, no, no, no!
Q: It was just a terrible tragedy. The pilots fought as hard as they
could to
save the plane, but were unable to do so, and the bottom line is a
lot of people died? A: Yes, but as is common in all-out emergencies, the human factor
was not
“perfect.” Pilots were working at cross purposes, but not
intentionally! Look up the data on the 1979 case and point this out
to the conspiracy thirsty correspondents!
Q: Next item on the
agenda: the loss of the new Mars probe. As of
the latest
I heard, it had still not “called home.” Is the Mars probe lost?
A: Not lost, just partly dysfunctional.
Q: Why is it dysfunctional? Or partly dysfunctional?
A: Rocky surface, misalignment of antennae, slight damage to
communications
package. may still be retrievable if technicians can locate proper
backup software inlet.
Q: So, that is the advice to try to save the mission?
A: Yes.
Q: Anything else? A:
No.
Q: So, there is no conspiracy there, either?
A: It is just as dangerous and just as useless to “see” conspiracy
in
everything s it is to “see” conspiracy in nothing. We tire of
conspiracy “buffs.” They are nutty, and serve as perfect false
sponsors to those who really DO seek to conduct widespread
mental/psychic manipulations and control.
Q: Okay, that leads into the next question about the excessive
contrail
activity. (F) I read the articles about the contrails. There did not
seem to be any way of verifying anything that was said. Essentially,
you were left with the claims of this or that person, few of whom
were trained observers, or who were taking all the factors into
consideration. (L) Well, we noticed them a lot in the spring of 1998
when we had all the floods and fires later. They are THERE! (F) Yes,
but the claims are that contrails were appearing in clear skies, at
which point the sky became overcast as a result of these contrails,
when the two may not have been related at all. Then, people were
noticing cob webs or “angel hair” type stuff falling on the ground.
(L) I agree that a lot of it is unverifiable and I haven’t seen any
hard proof myself, either; but they ARE there! LOTS of these jets
flying about. An exceedingly LOT of flying! And, not only that, other things have been reported and
photographed; strange streaks and lines in the sky, dark and light both - as though some
sort of cosmic structure is bleeding through! (F) Yes, but you have to
wonder about these people. I mean, the stuff about the radar anomalies was
clearly an
example of ignorance of both radar and weather. Oh, yes, big spheres
appear on
the radar, but those have been appearing forever! They are nothing
but cumulo-nimbus blow-ups - what is called a meso-cyclone, and is very common.
The only
reason they are getting excited about it is because there is all
this
communication, all these satellite and radar link-ups, and now the
average
person gets to see what weathermen have been seeing all along! More
coverage
and communication just makes it seem like it is something new.
People need
knowledge about this! Sure, there is stuff going on out there, but
people seem
to be seeing boogy men behind absolutely everything that happens!
And this is
because they have no knowledge about these things. Why are these
people going
off the deep end about these half-baked ideas without bothering to
get expert
opinions, or even a number of opinions? Why do they promulgate all
this
nonsense to everybody else as though THEY are experts, with nothing
to balance
the observations in the way of competent analysis? Meso-cyclones,
eruptions of
cumulo-nimbus super cells are, by their very nature, perfectly
circular because
of the cyclonic up-draft! (L) But, the fact still remains, in my
opinion, that
there are a LOT, LOT, LOT of planes flying above us in the past few
years! Whether they are dumping anything on our heads, or what,
there are an extreme number of planes flying in these upper level
criss-cross patterns. Now, whether they are just playing war-games,
or they are spy planes, they are doing SOMETHING! What is the reason
for all of this upper level flying that results in these
criss-crossed contrails that everybody is seeing? A: A lot of it is “training maneuver”oriented.
Q: Why are they training so many pilots? What are they preparing
for? A: Military budgets must be justified, you know. Review
“Military-Industrial
Complex 101.”
Q: So, this is just training flight, justification of budget, and
nothing more than that? A: Well, we would not say “not anything more to it than that,” but,
when you
say “M-IC,” you have said a lot!
Q: Are you implying that there is a build-up of the
Military-Industrial Complex for a reason? A: To preserve status quo during “peacetime.” This peace business is
not very
profitable, you know.
Q: Does that suggest that they are building up to set off a war so
they can make more money? A: Maybe if indeed, and if the populous can be hoodwinked. But,
fortunately,
the public is less hoodwinkable. Maybe the real enemy is “out there,
“ rather than “over there.” Was it not always?
Q: Does any of this increased aircraft activity have anything to do
with the increased awareness and activities of aliens in and around
our planet? A: As always. But, this awareness is factionalized and
compartmentalized.
Q: This brings us to the question from one of our readers: is there
anything to this so-called “Gulf War Syndrome?” A: Of course.
Q: What is the real cause of the “Gulf War Syndrome?”
A: Medications used supposedly to counteract effects of serin; nerve
agent.
Q: So, a medication was given to these people to counteract a
possible threat to live, and the medication itself was a threat to
life? A: Yes.
Q: Now, on a similar subject: what I hear from various
correspondents on the net, there are a lot of folks who have
“emerging” Montauk memories. These folks are “waking up” and it is
now “kitschy” to be a “Montauk Survivor.” It’s like a sub-culture...
can it be possible that this many people... A: No.
Q: Well, what is it that these people are remembering? As I
understand it, they are very sincere and are convinced that they
have these “Montauk experiment” memories. A: Some do, but most, no.
Q: Well, the ones who don’t, are they lying deliberately, or are
they being deceived with screen memories from abductions; have they
received some sort of programming to make them believe this; or are
they just being caught up in a sort of hysteria that is “catching”
and gets them attention? A: The latter is closest.
Q: Is there any way a person can discover who, among them, is
telling the
truth? Is there any clue to validate what any of them are saying?
A: Is it not obvious? Check thoroughly into their background using
recollections of independent third parties. If the supposed
“Montaukee” was known to have never have lived anywhere near
Montauk, then it would seem unlikely they were ever there.
Q: Now, according to some information posted on the Millennium Group
site,
there are some photographs that seem to indicate that there IS
something anomalous in orbit around the Sun... maybe a new “planet,
“ or something. Is there a new object in our solar system in a close
orbit around the sun? A: Maybe.
Q: There is conjecture that this object appeared around the time of
the passage
of
the Hale Bopp comet. Is that the case?
A: No.
Q: Is this object that is possibly in orbit around the sun, is it a
natural or artificial construction? A: Latter. Q Who constructed it?
A: Orion STS.
Q: What is it? A:
HQ.
Q: The Orion Headquarters? A: For your star system.
Q: Okay, you said “maybe” to this being a “new object.” When did it
arrive, or when was it placed there? A: You measure “time” linearly.
Q: Can we give it a “linear” definition, or does it come and go
through some sort of portal in terms of time, in a cyclical way, or
a variable and selective way? A: Yes, but it arrived at that coordinate 26730 years ago, sort of.
Q: What is its orbit, or distance from the Sun?
A: 31,230,000 miles.
Q: How large is this object?
A: 1005.6 kilometers diameter.
Q: What is the general configuration or shape of it? (A) A sphere, a
ball, a disc, a cylinder? A: Partial sphere, hexagonal.
Q: (A) Is it in a circular orbit or an elliptical orbit?
A: Circular. Rotation is altered by guidance system, gravitationally
powered.
Q: What is its angle to the plane of the ecliptic?
A: 21 degrees.
Q: Okay, you said that it is “headquarters,” so that answers what it
does. And, it did not arrive with Hale Bopp. Just off to the side,
was there REALLY a Hale Bopp companion - this rumor just won’t die!?
A: No.
Q: Now, what do these Orions DO in this object? I mean, isn’t it a
little warm so close to the sun? I know. That’s a stupid question.
Space is cold. A: Yes, and study magnetism for answers.
Q: Do Orions LIVE in this object? A: Close.
Q: Do they use it as a transfer portal? A:
Yes.
Q: So, it is a doorway, so to speak?
A: Doorway as are many.
Q: How many of these objects are in our solar system?
A: Two.
Q: Where is the other one?
A: Outside, on the fringe of the solar system.
Q: Is the government, or some faction or department, aware of this
object? A: Yes.
Q: Anything else you can tell us about this object?
A: No need.
[Break to look at photographs.]
Q: Now, in terms of the photographs of this object, it looks sort of
like two cylindrical objects with a dome or energy flow arc at the
top. Could you tell us what we were seeing. A: The object.
Q: Was it two part? A: No.
Q:
What was this arc looking part? Part of the spherical part?
A: Your visual perspective.
Q: Are the two cylindrical parts aspects of the hexagonal shape
extending down
from a spherical cap? A: Close.
Q: Now, related in a general sort of way, there is Ong’s Hat, Emory
Cranston, and the Incunabula Papers. Supposedly they are like a
“democratic time travel” group. There are claims that they were
raided some years back, several of them were killed, and there is
quite a story behind this group. Is Ong’s Hat what it claims to be?
A: No.
Q: Is Ong’s Hat a cover for some sort of covert government
operation? A: No.
Q: IS Ong’s Hat a group of people who are actually experimenting
with time travel? A: Close.
Q: Are they experimenting with physical time travel, or time travel
via consciousness? A: both, but with limited success.
Q: Were they actually raided by the “powers that be,” and were some
of them killed as is claimed in the story? A: Yes.
Q: Who is Emory Cranston? I have heard it is a pseudonym...
A: Pseudoscientist.
Q: Do you mean he really knows what he is doing, or he just has a
good clue as to what he is doing? A: Latter.
Q:
Is there any benefit to us to pursue this “Ong’s Hat” clue?
A: Not really.
Q: Okay, Philip K. Dick wrote this book called V.A.L.I.S., meaning
Vast Active Living Intelligence or Information System. Some of his
information was strikingly similar to the information we have
received through this source. He obviously wasn’t prepared for this
in the same way that Don Elkins was not prepared for the Ra
Material, and it caused a lot of problems in his life. Was Philip
Dick channelling something like a Sixth Density source? A:
Not much of the time, but in part.
Q: Was he being abducted by aliens?
A: Interaction.
Q: Did he actually live in another universe...
A: No.
Q: He didn’t live in another branch of the universe where Germany
won the war
and everything was horrible? A: No.
Q: Why did he have these memories of having lived in another time
and then... A: Genius is next to insanity.
Q:
So, he was a genius in his ideas, but they unbalanced him?
A: Close.
Q: He claims to have had a couple of experiences very similar to
some I have
had; and in these experiences he claims to have actually seen the
underlying reality matrix... he saw the universe as it really is, in
its nature of flowing lights and colors and so forth, as it
reformed, so to speak... was he seeing 4th density? A: Close.
Q: We have been discussing the possiblity of Rigel going supernova
as has been
suggested in the past, and the arrival of the optical effects being
conducive to DNA changes in human beings. Is this, in fact, possible
or probable? A: Yes.
Q: Are the optical effects of the supernova the same as The Wave?
A: Do not get ahead of yourself. The Wave will be apparent when it
arrives.
Q: Is this wave different from the optical effects of the supernova?
A: Yes.
Q: Is this wave related to the supernova in some way?
A: No.
Q: Are only those who have a certain frequency going to transition
to 4th
density, or is it that the whole planet is going to transition and
folks don’t really have a choice in the matter? A: Complex issues, suggest you accept dualities rather than
uniformities.
Q: Well, what I am trying to get at is: will those who transition to
4th density, for all intents and purposes, disappear to those who
remain at third density? A: We have discussed options before, for your perusal.
Q: Well, I have read them, and have posted them, but some folks
don’t quite understand. They want to understand if people will
experience this as a sort of “Rapture” event where people just
disappear? A: But the definitive answer they seek is predicated upon uniformity
of
experience based upon the typical 3rd density linear time model.
Q: Another question along this line: one reader noted that the last
time the “Wave” arrived, there were 6 billion people on the planet.
And now, it is supposed to be coming again, and we are again in that
ballpark in terms of population. So, the question is: is this sort
of like a marker for the Wave, sort of like a critical mass? A:
Numbers don’t mark. Psychic aural fields of energy mark.
Q: I have two last questions: at one point you said to note the
“struggle out of sequence with pre-ordained activities of royal
bloodlines.” Now, of course, I made the remark about usurpation of a
throne, but later I realized that we don’t really know what the
pre-ordained activities of royal bloodlines really are. They don’t
necessarily have to do with a secular position, they could be a
function. What are the pre-ordained activities of royal bloodlines?
A: Control.
Q: Control of what? People?
A: Close.
Q: Control of the reality in some sense?
A: Not as close.
Q: Control as in STS domination?
A: Yes.
Q: Are there any other pre-ordained activities?
A: Need there be?
Q: Okay, “struggle out of sequence.” Loss of control? The royal
bloodlines lose control? A: Only when energies build prior to completion of cycle.
Q: What sign am I looking for? Struggle out of sequence... a
rebellion that breaks out... a particular cycle to these events... a
period of time? A: You need to review.
Q: I want to clarify the issue of Jesus’ wives. The first time we
asked, you said that Jesus was not married, but had three children
with three Roman women. The second time we asked, you said he had a
wife, Anatylenia, and had three children with this one woman. My
question is: did he have six children, three with one woman, and one
each with three other women? A: No.
Q: He had a wife and not the three Roman women?
A: No.
Q: Did he have a wife? A:
Three women, all were wives, in the “Biblical sense.”
Q: Now, Anatylenia was one of these Roman women?
A: Yes.
Q: Who were here parents? What was her patronym?
A: Sermalain and Galleinia.
Q: There were three children, one from each woman?
A: Yes.
Q: Male and female children?
A: Yes.
Q: How many of these children were male?
A: Two.
Q: Two boys and one girl.
Q: What was the name of the boys? A: No, not for tonight’s session. Low energy now. So, goodnight.
End of Session
Back to Contents
January 22, 2000
Q: Hello. A: Hello.
Q: And who do we have with us this evening?
A: Anoova.
Q: And where do you transmit through?
A: Cassiopaea.
Q: As you know, the morning after the last session, I woke up in
extreme pain. It took several weeks to get this under control, and
all the physical efforts seemed to have little or no effect. I went
to the chiropractor, I had acupuncture, massage, ice, heat, you name
it. I would like to know what was the cause of this physical attack?
A: Tenseness, aggravated by sleep posture and psychic tear in medial
collateral
veil of etheric body. This leads to “opportunistic” invasion of
energies intent upon harm.
Q: What was the cause of the weakening of the etheric body, or the
“tear” you have identified? A: Emotional/psychic distress relating to original malady, and
weakened
resistance of etheric protection system.
Q: When you mention an “original malady,” what do you mean,
specifically? A: Muscular. Think of it as the etheric equivalent of bacteria
invading a
cavity.
Q: So, something broke through the veil of an etheric nature?
A: Yes.
Q: Can we identify them?
A: Represented by those who wish you were not as aware and as
communicative as
you are; i.e. 4th density STS.
Q: Was it a spirit attachment, or was it more like a pipeline
pumping in negative energy? A: Closer to latter. Recent events indicate attack. Vigilance should
be
powered up! Ark has also been “under the gun.”
Q: So, we should be expecting attack?
A: Expecting it then countering it thusly.
Q: What aspect of our lives, which of our activities, was the origin
of the
weakness: financial, emotional, or what? A: The origin is not nearly so important as the awareness/vigilance.
Q: Well, the upcoming attack mode you have identified: is it going
to be
psychic, emotional, financial, or what? A: Psychic, of course. This can affect all other realms obviously!
We have
discussed this before. And, be always aware. The more exposure you
have, the more potential portals come into the picture.
Q:
Are you alluding to the upcoming article Tom French is writing?
A: Yes, and the website, etc...
Q: Well, if that is the case, ought we to tone down what we are
putting on the
website? A: Awareness does not usually require concession.
Q: Any specific advice? A: Vigilance is the key.
Q: (A) The original question was “why did this come about just after
the last
session?” Considering that all of the recent sessions have been very
draining, and that seems to indicate that some element of corruption
has been coming through. A: Awareness negates that.
Q: If you are aware that you are being drained, then the obvious
solution is to
stop having the sessions. A: No. Aware that attempts will be made to drain.
Q: What was it, in particular, about this last session that made me
so vulnerable? Lack of awareness? A: Close.
Q:
You had said that the channel was “grooved” and that other forces
couldn’t “horn in” any longer. So, I was being comfortable with that
idea... A: If you have bacterial invasion of your oral cavity, awareness of
this prompts you to gargle with peroxide.
Q: What is the equivalent of gargling with peroxide after doing a
session? A: Awareness leads to mental/psychic resolve that “will not be
drained, the
attack will not succeed.”
Q: (A) In what sense was I “under the gun?”
A: Injuries/maladies.
Q: The flu and your toe, I guess. Is there any other thing on this
attack issue; any area where we are most vulnerable that we need to
pay attention? A: Just be aware of all portals.
Q: Could this have a financial effect on us? A:
It could, but if vigilant, less apt to occur.
Q:
Do you see the job situation as being stable for the time being?
A: Mostly.
Q: Mostly is not completely!
A: What could affect this?
Q: Well, they recently started making noises about creating a
position at the company for regular employment, designed, it seemed,
for Ark to apply. He did not do so because he was advised that, if
he did, it would put him in a far more precarious position. He would
not have a contract, being a regular employee, he could be fired
summarily, which this bunch seems to do from time to time, the
benefits are lousy, he would have to work IN the building instead of
at home; it just was not an attractive option. Then, we found out
that a couple of people DID apply for the position, and they were
only offered 30 thousand a year, which is pennies. So, will they
take the fact that Ark did NOT apply for this position askance, or
are they trying to get somebody in there to take the position so
that he is no longer necessary? Those are some of my concerns.
Besides, this is a REALLY weird company! They just collect
government money and do nothing! A: Like a front, yes?
Q: Yeah. What’s it a front for? Well, maybe they will keep Ark, they
can keep up appearances! They can say that somebody is really doing
something! Any comment? A: No.
Q: (A) Now, I contacted IBR, Santilli, and kind of announced that I
am interested in a grant that they have advertised. Apparently, on
Monday, I will call Santilli and arrange a meeting, perhaps. I would
like to know if I am entering some potentially dangerous
involvement, or if I am entering into something which potentially
can bring good future opportunities? I would like to have some
advice here? A: More likely the latter.
Q: (A) What approach is good...
A: Straightforward.
Q: (A) Also, since we are talking about this job situation, I would
like to
ask about this Miami opening which I applied for, but its part of
the game. What chances do you see of getting this, or another
position because of this application? A: Your future is better served as an independent agent. When you
are working
within the confines of realms controlled by others, you are quite
vulnerable.
Q: Now, we have this picture of this sort of “track” on the Moon
here. It is
29 KM long and about 1 KM wide, and they are calling it a “landing
strip.” Well, it’s pretty big to be a landing strip, in my opinion. What is
it? A: Residue of ancient mining operation.
Q:
How ancient, by our calendar? A: 350,000 years, approximately.
Q: In specific, how does this mark relate to a mining operation? Was
it like
strip mining, or where mining machines were driving back and forth,
or what? A: Underground channel mining.
Q: So, it is a depression caused by an underground mine. What was
being mined? A: Lignite and gold.
Q: Who was doing the mining?
A: Who made you?
Q: Orions? A:
Yes.
Q: What did they use this lignite and gold for?
A: Conduction of electromagnetism.
Q: Did they take this material out of our solar system to use
elsewhere? A: Some.
Q: (A) I don’t understand something here. These alchemists, who were
not so
clever as 4th density, were apparently able to produce gold. Now,
these Orions who are so much more advanced, one would suppose, could
not do transmutation, but needed to engage in mining? If they are so
clever, why couldn’t they transmute iron to gold? Why did they have
to mine the gold? A: Have to? Not necessarily. Greed dictates that when it is there
for the
taking, do so. Does the counterfeiter walk away from a stash of
cash?
Q: I had a dream the other night that somehow we travelled in time,
to the
past, and for some reason it was the period of time in which
Nostradamus lived, and we encountered him. There were people
watching us, and these people decided that we, along with
Nostradamus, were to be burned at the stake for sorcery. During this
interaction with Nostradamus, we learned from him that he was also a
time traveller from the future, though from a different timeline
than ours. We had intersected with him at this particular point in
our past. It seemed to be very important that Nostradamus NOT be
burned at the stake, important for the future of humanity. But, we
couldn’t get back to the future. People who were monitoring events
from the future saw the difficulty, and they sent reinforcements,
and were going to kill off all these people who were trying to burn
us all at the stake. It seemed to be more important that HE continue
to exist, though they didn’t care a lot about whether we did so or
not, though we were saved as a sort of byproduct of this activity.
So, we got saved from being burned at the stake. I was taken by this
group who had come back into the past, and they had disguised me and
were sending me to a convent, but Ark and some others came along and
rescued me. We realized that we were stuck in the past, and could do
nothing but hope that someone from the future was going to come back
and save us, or to find our time machine and fix it, so we decided
to live our lives as part of this past situation, while at the same
time, keeping our eyes open for our chance to get out of there. We
started a horse farm as a “cover” for our activities. The last thing
was a remark made at the end of the dream saying that I was
descended from Nostradamus on my Knight side of the family, and that
was why we “intersected” with him in our time travel excursion. That
made me a descendant in the future, of somebody who had traveled
into the past from a different future and had gotten stuck there...
tell me about this dream! A: Well, check out the genealogy.
Q: Was, Nostradamus a time traveller into the past, which is why he
wrote all
these prophecies that were partially, or occasionally accurate, but
in general, not? Is it because his travel into the past CHANGED the
future? A: Maybe, at the soul level. But then again, who is to say that the
same does
not apply to you all now!?!
Q: I was thinking about time travel when I went to sleep that night.
I wasn’t
thinking about Nostradamus, for sure, but I was pondering time
travel. The
thing I was thinking about was that, for some reason, we are all
going about it
in the wrong direction. Time travel is, in my opinion, a lot easier
than we
suspect, though I can’t quite wrap my mind around what it is we are
missing
here. Can you help me out here? People keep thinking in terms of a)
collapsing the gravity wave so that time around stops; or b) going
faster than
light so that time stops in that way. Either of those two approaches
seems to
be going at it backward, but I can’t explain why. What is it that I
am trying to get my mind to grab onto that is slipping away? A:
Changing channels.
Q: Changing channels? You mean you can change channels to do it?
A: Yes. All is present, there is your illusion.
Q: Is the changing of channels something that is accomplished
internally, like in the physiological structure, or in the
mental/psychic/soul structure? A: More complex.
Q: But, you said before that one has to generate an electromagnetic
field, a la Tesla coils, do you have to have massive amounts of
power in order to change channels and time travel? A: That is the pathway accessible from 3rd density.
Q: How much power do you have to have? A:
Let us just say that GIGAWATT is the term of choice.
Q: Okay, if you are generating a magnetic field, and you “change the
channel,” is it from that immediate point within this field, that
you can access a channel of some sort, and move into a different
timeline. I mean, is it like being suddenly placed at the center of
a spider web, with all the times available all around one, and it is
a matter of direction of choice? A: Something like that.
Q: What kind of device, or control system would you use to select
the proper channel? Is this strictly a mental activity, or is there
something that you use to select a frequency which resonates with a
particular time, or channel, and you have to experiment to figure
out which time is which frequency? (A) How do we tune? A:
Your suggestion of mental imagining’s good.
Q:
So you have to be able to create a mental image, which means that
you must HAVE a mental image of something that is fairly accurate
that will pull you into the right “time line.” You have to have a
marker, a significant marker! A: Dates will do.
Q: If dates will do, and the calendar has been screwed with so much,
do you use the concept of say, “2000 years before today,” ignoring
conventional calendrical systems? Is that it? A: One method.
Q: Well, clearly, if you are traveling backwards and forwards in
time, you want to move into the timeline in a discreet manner. You
don’t want to just appear in the middle of a street in a busy city
with a bunch of people standing around staring at your
materialization, who immediately grab you and burn you at the stake.
So, if that is the case, perhaps you want to select your location as
well as your time. And, how can you select a location without having
an image, and how can you know that your image of the location is
correct if... A: Your are assuming immediate appearance in the visual spectrum as
recognized
by 3rd density.
Q: So, assuming that one materializes immediately is apparently not
so. A: It is not necessarily so.
Q: So, you can time travel and remain invisible? Sort of in an
ethereal state, and then opt, at any point, to become more solid?
A: If you have skill/knowledge. If not, it could indeed be a
“crapshoot.”
Q: Is that 7-11 you win; snake eyes you lose!? (A) But this time
travel involves TransDimensional Remolecularization. (L) I guess, if you
have the skill it does, but if not, it doesn’t. Very interesting. I
have been looking at the French cave paintings which are so
obviously superior to later prehistoric art, and I started thinking
that maybe these caves could be what time travellers use as their
points of entry and departure. (A) Suppose you time travel, can some
other beings, even advanced humans, see you on a screen or
something? In other words, when you time travel, can they monitor
you? Kill you, block you? Are they “watching” to make sure that
nobody time travels? Is there some sort of “time travel police,” as
was suggested in a movie I once saw? Is this possible? A: Can be monitored, but only to a limited extent.
Q: Is time travel something that is going to be a significant part
of our
future? A: Yes, absolutely!!!
Q: This dream I had, when we appeared in this other reality, we came
tumbling down a chute of some sort, through the castle wall, and
landed on our bottoms in this hallway with people walking back and
forth! We were standing in a field one minute, and the next minute
there we were! We weren’t even dressed appropriately. (F) Yes, it
would be hard to explain to Henry VIII who Calvin Klein is! (L) But,
on the other hand, there is always the possibility that time travel
could include transferring your focus of consciousness from one of
your “selves” in one time period to another of your selves in
another period, what we would call another “incarnation.” You just
change your focus. A: These all are reality. And of course, the UFO issue is tied into
this too.
Q: Now, that reminds me: we have this bizarre picture here of this
absolutely strange creature in a museum in Germany. So, speaking of
time travel and UFOs, what is this 265 year old creature kept in
formaldehyde? A: Hybridized conception/gestate.
Q: Was there hybridization and genetic manipulation going on almost
300 years ago? A: Most done this way are miscarried.
Q: Did it live at all after birth? A: No.
Q: Who was responsible for this experiment?
A: It was not an experiment. It was the result of Reptoid “rape.”
Q: So, the mother was raped by a reptoid. Why do reptoids rape human
women? A: We have discussed motives.
Q: Yes. They feed on the fear, terror, or absorb some substance
emitted by the sexual organs and chakra, and in some cases they are
“changing the genetic program.” But, in general, when we have
discussed this, it has not included impregnating human women with
Reptoid sperm. How often does this activity result in impregnation?
A: Rarely.
Q: So, in this case it did, and here is the result. Pretty horrible.
We have been puzzling for some time over a remark you once made
that, at 4th density, there is no right or left. How can we
conceptualize this? A: It is difficult of you to conceive of this. Directionals exist
within the
perceived limitations of your reality.
Q: Are you saying that at 4th density, an individual exists as a
“point consciousness” and there is no materiality unless you will it
to be so? A: Close.
Q: (A) Does it have anything to do with the fact that, on a mobius
strip, there is no right or left? A: Yes.
Q:
A mobius strip is not so difficult to think about at all. I also
know about mathematics in which you can add extra dimension which
can change left into right. It is not a problem. Should we think
about something like this? A: If everything is in reality circular in nature, then direction is
optional.
Q: (L) We have been having a little discussion on our mailgroup, and
one
participant commented that our remarks about the Lizzies makes it
seem that we are thinking of them in terms of “cosmic niggers,” as
she put it. She is focused on unifying the dark and the light within
herself. She has suggested that STS and STO might not be the only
options to choose, that there might be other options that we are not
aware of. She thinks that choosing one or the other boils down to
choosing one side AGAINST the other. She wondered what you would say
about our apparent “racisim” regarding the Lizzies. I responded that
the Lizzies were, in realty, cosmic Nazis. But, the bottom line is
that she more or less wants to “love” Lizzies. A: When one “desires,” one is expressing STS.
Q: (A) Does this also relate to desire for knowledge?
A: Yes.
Q: So, in our drive to obtain knowledge, we are STS?
A: You are STS, period.
Q: But, once we have knowledge, we become STO?
A: No.
Q: But, you are always saying that we should seek to gain knowledge.
You are
supposed to be STO, and we are supposed to be STO candidates, so how
does that... A: While you are in this realm, you are by nature STS. Gaining
knowledge is a
separate issue.
Q: So, I guess that if you are in a realm where you can’t help but
be STS, then
you ought to be STS about gaining knowledge, because it is the only
thing that can assist in changing. (A) There are different ways to
desire something. One has the choice of WHAT to desire. (L) Now,
there is a lot of talk about the imminent stockmarket crash, so I
put up the financial info on the site without any specific advice.
Could you comment on this potential for a major crash or depression
happening this year? A: Is there not always an “imminent” crash/depression?
Q: Of course there is! It’s like the Weekly World News predicting
the imminent
End of the World about once a month. Eventually, they will be right!
(A) Maybe not. (L) Well, another thing that was brought up in our
discussion with this new gal in the mail group was that nothing of
any importance of significance would happen in terms of transition
on the earth for at least another thousand years or so. She was
saying that we would slowly transform for the next thousand years,
and there would be no cataclysms or earth changes. I am wondering if
this is a new option that has come up because of changes in
consciousness? A: It may be. But remember, the “future” is merely a matter of which
reality
one experiences in real time, so called. It is merely which of those
that exist shall the menu selectors elect?
Q: I am curious. Now we have the big 05-05-2000 coming up. I was
reading
something about this today. Apparently on this date, the planets
line up in conjunction with the peak of the solar cycle and there is
supposed to be the “Big Kahuna” of earthquakes or whatever. What is
the liklihood of the majority of people experiencing THAT timeline?
A: 0.1
Q: (A) Many people are saying that the most probably date of earth
change is
2012. That falls in what you previously you gave as an outside limit
of the arrival of the comet cluster, twin sun business; in the
middle, in fact. Of course, it may never happen, but is this still
the case? A: Maybe...
Q: (A) Is this a better probability than 0.1?
A: Between 0.1 and 100.
Q: [Laughter] (F) Well, THAT narrows it down! (L) As you know, Tom
French is finishing the article and it is supposed to be published either
on January 30th or February 13. They have turned it into a “love
story,” and you guys are being presented as “cosmic matchmakers.”
Comment, please. A: News media are mischievous.
Q: One thing about it is probably is that everybody who wants to
find their
soul mate will be on the line asking you guys to find theirs! That
is a distinct possibility! (F) Along with requests for lotto
numbers! Yes, and for $59.95 we will be happy to oblige. No refunds!
[Laughter]
(L) Hmmmm.... is that a good idea?
A: Yes.
Q: There you have it! (F) Yes, they can pay or shut up! If people
are going
to seek you out for their own benefits, they will just have to pay
up. You would never have a moment’s peace otherwise. Every 15
minutes the phone would ring. (L) What an interesting idea. (F) How
could you not have thought of it? (L) Well, because we have never
charged anybody anything. Never. (A)
Yes. Cash only. (F) The point is, you are not soliciting business.
It will
solicit you. But... if we are going to all be involved in this
solicitation of
advice from the Cassiopaeans, we should ALL profit! The thing I am
concerned
about is not so much the positive fallout, but the negative fallout.
(L) What
is the possibility of the negative fallout; aside from being
attacked by the
fundamentalists, crosses being burned on our lawn, and all that. (F)
Well, it all depends on the content. If Tom is fast and loose with
his words, or the editor is - well, it could be a problem. (A) Now,
we were discussing this right and left business, and you were
suggesting that there were many, many time loops, and the space/time
is fractal or something like that, and that this is the reason that
there is no right or left. I had a different idea that these time
loops exist, and yes, maybe space/time is fractal, but that this
absence of left and right has to do with access to real, big, huge,
extra dimensions. You somehow stressed this nonexistence of the
distinction between left and right, and because you stressed this, I
would like to know which way to go with my math. Any comment?
A: Best to place options before us for response.
Q: (A) The options are 1) Fractality of space/time becomes relevant
in higher densities; and 2) Additional dimension and hyperspace
available. A: Choose option 2.
Q: I would like to find out how Terry and Jan are doing.
A: Pondering return.
Q: Why? A:
Not comfortable with move.
Q: I saw my daughter this evening and she wouldn’t even look at me
or speak to me. Why? A: Negative feelings, exercised by confrontations with inner
truths/conflicts.
Q: Jason and I were discussing the situation, and we were thinking
that if my mother lives long enough, the girls will eventually learn
about her. But, if she dies before they learn, they will never
figure it out and will always think I am the bad guy. A: No. Rebellious offspring are inevitable, to some extent. But it
is not
permanent, nor your responsibility.
Q: I dreamed the other night that my brother died. This was
upsetting to me. Should I tell him about this dream; give him some
sort of warning? Was it a warning to me? How should I respond to
this? A: How?
Q: Do you mean “how did he die?”
A: Yes.
Q: Well, it was a heart attack, I guess.
A: Then, warnings should help.
Q: Is it a possibility that my brother is going to die of a heart
attack? A: Well, all such possibilities exist for all, to some extent.
Q: I remember having three death dreams, but they seem now, to have
been dreams of my impending divorce. So, I was wondering if this
dream about him could have been a signal of some impending change in
his situation. A: Maybe, but best to make aware.
Q: Anything else? A: No. Good night.
End of Session
Back to Contents
February 5,
2000
Q: Hello. A: Hello.
Q: And who do we have with us this evening?
A: Tiannih.
Q: And where do you transmit through?
A: Cassiopaea.
Q: Okay, we have a bit of a problem here. I would like to ask some
personal
questions without fear of being thought too STS. A: It is STS, but so be it.
Q: Has there been a major change in Tom French’s attitude lately?
A: No.
Q: Has Tom always thought that I was a little crazy?
A: Yes.
Q: How did he manage to conceal this from me? I mean, I perceived
interest and intellectual participation. How did he maintain this
facade? A: Interest in his subject.
Q: What is his subject as he sees it?
A: You.
Q: Well, how does he see me?
A: Fascinating woman.
Q: Why does he not convey THAT in his article as much as he conveys
that he thinks I am crazy? A: He does not view you as “crazy” in the literal sense. Rather, he
views you
as a wild eccentric, using eccentricity as your own personal mode of
surviving the struggles common to all humanity. More overview
needed. Mister French does indeed like you, Laura. In fact, it would
not be entirely inaccurate to say that there even has been some
prurient interest there at times... But, such is the state with this
soul. He does not intend to cause harm. But he has repeatedly
misjudged the depth of your being, often trying to label. He still
does not quite get it. But, his domain does not contain as much
depth as yours. Try to understand, the concept of 6th density light
beings is as foreign to him as professional wrestling is to you.
Q: (F) But, that begs the question: how familiar is professional
wrestling to him? (L) I suppose that he is working on the changes we
have discussed. Is this the case? A: To some extent.
Q: Are there any other changes that we ought to ask him to make?
A: Maybe a little.
Q: What is the most probable and likely result of the article with
the changes that are being made, and as it will come out, following
the present probabilities? A: Bouquets and daggers. Fame and infame. But, Laura, Freddie, and
Arkadiusz:
such is the state of the realm in which you now reside... If you
cannot stand the heat, get out of the kitchen... But if you leave
the kitchen, you will miss the aroma. In general, those predisposed
to react positively will do so, regardless of literary content, and
vice versa.
Q: I guess it is as it is, and that is that. How are the girls going
to react to this thing? I am so worried about Anna being upset.
A: Anna is less vulnerable at this point. She may view any
“questionable”
content as simple vindication of already existing negative feelings
toward you.
In other words, she may externalize rather than internalize.
Q: How is L going to react to finding out that I thought he was a
robotoid? A: You should nip that one.
Q: Is this story going to have positive or negative effects on Tom’s
career, aside from its effects on us? A: More positive.
Q: (A) Is there anything important which we should try to have
changed beyond
what we have already thought of? Is there anything important, that
can make a difference, that has not occurred to us? A: Well, it is late in the game for very much more revision.
However, this
may serve to attract further outside interest.
Q: The article will attract further outside interest?
A: Yes, tv, news, authors, publishers, etc... Remember, the Saint
Petersburg
Times has a well visited web site, too!
Q: Well, why do we feel like we are waiting for the guillotine to
fall on our
heads? A: Guillotine will miss its mark if one retracts head.
Q: Back during the time before Tom and Cherie got their divorces, I
had a dream
that they DID get divorced, and in the dream was the clear
suggestion that they got divorced to be together. But, in the end,
Cherie changed her mind. However, it seems that Tom is the one who
has changed his mind and Cherie has been wondering why? A:
All chapters to that story have not yet been written.
Q: Tom has a new girlfriend, Madeline. We have the suspicion that
Tom’s new girlfriend has been sent in to obfuscate him, to have some
sort of influence over him. Is this perception anywhere near
accurate? A: Somewhere near.
Q: What does Madeline want from Tom?
A: Not sure.
Q: What does Madeline really think of Tom?
A: Ditto.
Q: Is there anything you CAN tell us about Madeline and Tom?
A: She cannot tell, not us. We would describe what Tom seeks from
her, but to
utilize your popular parlance: “you do not want to go there!”
Q: Well, what would be Cherie’s best course of action at present?
A: Patience pays. Niceness is usually the best option.
Q: What is the deal with this Santilli business? Do they have a
machine that is producing free energy, or at least more energy comes
out than is put in? A: No.
Q: Are they opposed to the idea of having somebody come in an have a
look because that person might discover that their claims are
greatly overrated? Are they using these claims as a lure to get
government funding? A: Will not get government funding. These people must not be aware
that the
“government” is fully aware of how to produce “free” energy. Some
private sources, European in nature, may be interested, though.
Q: Are they trying to attract funding fraudulently?
A: More clumsy than fraudulent.
Q: It’s really sad that Santilli is involved with such flakey
people! (F) Hasn’t he always been? (L) He is certainly influenced by
the wrong people! And I don’t think we want anything to do with him
at all. (A) Now, we we were talking about Kaluza Klein, and you
mentioned the Germans “exploring the loop of the cylinder” in
relation to time travel. I don’t know what this means but I have the
idea that it is related to extra dimensions, hyperspace. Now, we
asked a question at some point and you said that a cylinder is
really a double loop. You then suggested that we meditate on the
true meaning of this sentence. Now, I don’t know how to meditate,
but I do know how to do math. So, I drew three pictures here: one is
a real cylinder, two is a which is a kind of cylinder inside a
cylinder, and three, like a torus. Laura said that it wasn’t any of
these, that it should only have one side like a cylinder/mobius
strip - no left and no right. So, this could be option 4, something
like a Klein bottle or option 5, something called a twisted torus.
Is it 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5? Or 6, none of the above? Is it one of these?
A: Selection 3.
Q: 3 is the torus. (L) What is a loop of the cylinder? Yes, there is
one
loop and then there is another loop. One loop is probably what we
call time - cyclical time. A: Time cycle.
Q:
What is the second loop? A: Included, but not inclusive.
Q: I guess that means that it is included, but is not the whole
thing. It
covers that, but that isn’t the whole thing. What DOES it mean?
A: Yes.
Q: Wait, I asked what is the second loop. The second loop is
included but not
inclusive? A: Remember, you do have cycles but that does not necessarily mean
cyclical. 3
Dimensional depiction of loop, seek hexagon for more. Geometric
theory provides answers for key. Look to stellar windows. Octaon,
hexagon, pentagon.
Q: Are those the different levels of density?
A: No, but it relates. Geometry gets you there, algebra sets you
“free.”
Q: That’s funny. There is Tony Smith’s website, and whenever I
search for any
keyword that comes up here, I go straight to Tony Smith. He has
everything
there. (L) But, does he know what he is doing? (A) Well, he has it
all
there. He is now working on a new theory of gravity. (L) But, if he
really
knew something, would he be still walking around? Anything else?
A: No, not for now. Good night.
End of Session
Back to Contents
|