August 5, 2000
Ark, Laura, Freddie, Jon, Carrie
Q: Hello. A: Hello.
Q: And who do we have with us this evening?
A: Komorrih.
Q: And where do you transmit through?
A: Cassiopaea.
Q: We have guests this evening; this is Jon and Carrie. They have
traveled down from Ohio... A: Really?
Q: Yes, actually. Jon, would you like to lead off? Or Carrie?
[Negative.] Okay. I guess I’ll go first then... A: We would like to hear from your guests... We welcome Jon and his
esteemed
wife! Well....
Q: (J) I’m glad to be here, and...
A: You have been “here” before.
Q: (J) I guess I should add that I feel the service here is very
important. A: Important is good, but subjective. Start asking, Jon.
Q: (J) Okay... A: Do you remember Mel?
Q: (J) No, no. A: Search... We are attempting to get the ‘ball” rolling. Jon is
reluctant.
[Long pause] O.K., if Jon does not wish to participate now, we will
let him “jump in” when comfortable.
Q: (L) I do have a question. It says here in this Top Secret
document penned by the so-called Nexus Seven: “The bottom line is,
ARC has discovered that it is very possible that confirmation,
validation and consensus scientific acceptance equals an open
invitation to invasion. Think about it. Denial may be one of the
most powerful measures we have at our disposal to prevent the overt
acceptance of the reality of advanced alien presence into the
consensus consciousness. Denial is a munition.” They are saying that
as long as the whole idea of alien presence remains in the realm of
the fantastic and kooky, the implausible and mentally ill” that it
is a line of defense against aliens. They see this as just a little
“guided free will” to protect consensus belief using “popular
deployable psychological munitions of belief.” They are saying that
denial is a psychological weapon, a “deterrent of aliens into
mainstream reality since the aliens seem to respect the stance of
individual and group consciousness and acculturation free-will more
than military might and power. Therefore, we can, by accepting alien presence and existence above
board in
enough mainstream public, unwittingly turn off the restrictions
against overt contact the aliens are following. The overt invasion
trigger is our general human acceptance.” Could you comment on the
idea that denial of the reality is protection? Is that, in fact, so?
A: No. Protection comes from awareness, not the other way around.
Q: That was an interesting idea to me, so I did want to pose it.
Another idea in this document was that the patriarchal, monotheistic
religion brought some measure of blanket protection. From this
assessment, as soon as the patriarchal monotheism was installed on
the planet, the alien presence withdrew. Is this a valid concept?
Does the patriarchal monotheism act as a deterrent of alien
intrusion into our reality? A: This is a confused concept. Why would aliens install monotheistic
principles if the result is to close off the contact opportunity?
Q: That’s what I thought myself. I mean, what better contact
opportunity than under the guise of god, Jesus or angels or the Holy
Ghost. Alien intrusion into our reality was, in my opinion,
facilitated via the monotheistic religions. But, they did note that
after the institution of monotheism, the APPARENT alien contact
became much less, thus the conclusion they drew. A: The two events are either coincidental or inaccurately measured.
Q: Well, it is clear that the whole monotheistic religion was a
perfect front for the alien contact to continue to feed on humanity
within the holy of holies of the temples. It did NOT stop, as this
document suggests. The whole animal sacrifice thing, the offerings
to the gods, the chanting and praying and all that; it just gives a
whole new meaning to cattle mutilations! Sheesh! Okay, there IS
something very interesting in this document. “What is the final
ontological matrix of hidden truth? What elucidates all the aspects
of the true-to-life UFO phantasm in our past, present and future?
What are the critical goals of Echelon beyond information
suppression and technological catch-up? What are the
hyper-intelligence focal points for the future? The sun, our sun, is
dying, and too soon. This was caused by regional dimensional vortex
shutdown some 90,000 years ago. Solar instability can cause much
life on Earth to be unsustainable in 40 years. Ancient astro-theology
calendars all end around now. There are also dangerous
interplanetary bodies, with civilization threatening capability due
to cause more serious damage to Earth in another 150 years. One way
or the other we are slated to leave Earth, sooner or later, or else.
This is a prevailing secret truth. Those in control would rather
save themselves and a few elite than worry about the whole of
mankind, despite the presence of a few well meaning but deluded true
human patriots amongst the bunch.” Is, in fact, our sun dying?
A: Yes, and so is everything else.
Q: Is it going to do it in 40 years?
A: You do not understand our attempted allusion. What is not dying?
Q: Well, I KNOW that, but they are saying that our sun is dying too
soon. A: No. What is “too soon?”
Q: Well... (A) Forty years is certainly too soon!
A: Why?
Q: (A) Because scientists would normally give the sun much longer...
A: But do “scientists” really know?!?
Q:
You are NOT helping here! Are you saying this guy is right?! I
don’t want to talk about it anymore! A: Be patient, Laura, this is a lesson.
Q: Is our sun slated to burp and blink out in 2012 with the Mayan
calendar? A: We asked YOU a question. It is impolite to not answer!
Q: (A) Well, no, scientists don’t really know; but they conjecture.
A: Ah hah! Conjecture!
Q: So, what’s your point?
A: Our point is: what is too soon and why?
Q: Too soon would be... well, I guess that in completely objective
terms, there is no such thing as “too soon.” When things happen, it
is exactly the right time for it to happen. When something happens,
everything is perfect. A: Okay.
Q: So, in the deepest sense, nothing is ever too soon... however...
© What situations would have to be in place for this to happen
within forty years? A: There are unlimited numbers of situations...
Q: Are any of the situations that would have to be in place for the
sun to burp and go out in forty years actually present and activated
in our present time-line? A: Burp?
Q: Well, you know what I mean! Expand, become a red giant, burn out,
run out of gas, go supernova... A: Some of those possibilities are always present, especially when
combined
with multitudinal external factors.
Q: What would the external factors be?
A: Energies, or cosmic forces present in space at various locators
which the
sun would pass through in its journey through space, for one
example.
Q: Are we slated to pass through any of those energies or forces?
A: Wait and see.
Q: You guys can’t do that to me!
A: Yes we can!
Q: Well, let me ask the next question on that subject. Does any of
this have to do with dimensional vortexes that were shut down 90
thousand years ago in the area of Sirius? A: We are interested in knowing the “dimensional shutdown of vortex
process.”
Could you explain, please?
Q: Is there such a thing as a dimensional vortex?
A: Semantics.
Q: What would you call a dimensional vortex?
A: Once again, this is not flowing because you are navigating
haphazardly
through subjective proclamations.
Q: So, you are saying that all of this analysis of what the deep
ontological truths are, is just subjective proclamations. Was there
ever something that happened that might have been perceived by the
person who wrote this material, as a dimensional vortex shutdown 90
thousand years ago? A: What is that?!?
Q: So, basically, you are trying to point out that there is no such
thing as a dimensional vortex shutdown. But, you have said that the
planet Kantek exploded between 70 and 80 thousand years ago, right?
A: If so, that is not what the writer is attempting to portray
Q: Could it have been a supernova? A: Look here! This is pointless.
Q: So, all of this stuff is nonsense? A:
No.
Q: Are you telling me that I am too dense to get what you are trying
to say here? A: We would normally not suggest something as harsh as that.
Q: Well, the only thing you didn’t say was “but.”
A: Okay; “but.”
Q: So, I am really missing the point here. Okay. What I am getting
from what you are and are not saying, is that this person is clearly
trying to portray something, and that there IS something behind what
he is saying, but I am just too dense to figure out the right
question so you can download the answer. A: Dense? No my dear! You are just learning, as are we all.
Q: 90 thousand years ago. Is the 90 thousand a parameter for
something? Can I start there? A: We doubt it!
Q:
Now, I did have a thought that this 90 thousand year cycle could
be the period of the companion brown star you have said is on it’s
way into the solar system. Is that what they might be talking about?
A: Closer.
Q: So, what they are really talking about, or may have seen in some
way, is the companion star, rather than the death of our own sun. (A) Let me
just ask a
simple question. Can you estimate the likelihood that the sun will
die in 40
years? A: That is unlikely.
Q: Well, what a relief! (A) We are done! How unlikely?
A: There is one chance in 189 million.
Q:
Well, when I read this Top Secret document and they said this
business about the sun, I just really wondered where they were
getting all this! I mean, does the secret government really believe
this crap? And if they do, and all their actions are geared around
that, then that would explain a lot. But, if they don’t believe it,
then they might even be responsible for putting out this kind of
disinformation just to make people panic and get even more
anti-government so they can have more excuses to clamp down on the
masses and take away more freedoms! This Nexus Seven says right up
front: “ This document is a clear and present danger to the mental
health of unstable persons!” Well, they DID warn us! [Laughter] (A)
Well, it’s a Val Valerian source! The fact that one or more things
are wrong does not mean that everything is wrong! A: Arkadiusz is right on the money!! There is much accurate
information there
and some disinformation mixed in!
Q: Yes. I figured out that as long as the Nexus seven guys were
talking about the secret government echelons, the ideas of the
compartmentalization, the views of the different factions about how
to manage the alien threat, and so on, he was on pretty safe ground.
But, when he launched off onto the many things that were clearly
borrowed from a number of channeled sources, including Billy Meier,
he really missed the boat. But, it made me aware that there are
people in the government who really are following channeled
material, who are using it to make their assessments, because they
really don’t have much choice. They are as much against a brick wall
as most everyone else in figuring out the whole scenario! I guess
that Billy Meier and now this Anna Hayes, are their favorite guys
because it appeals to their STS hierarchical mindsets. But, when
they start to rely on channeled sources for their explanations,
they run off the road because most of that sort of information is
put out by the very beings they are trying to second guess, who
clearly, from all their behaviors, have a serious vested interest in
remaining behind the curtain, so to speak. It’s hardly likely that
they are going to go to all the trouble doing wicked things in
secret, and then blab all their secrets to every Gray Hugger on the
planet who sits down with a pyramid on their head! And, when the
abductors come and “take you to their leader” to “explain the facts
of life” to you, because you have been “demanding answers” all your
life, don’t expect them to tell the truth. It’s like the Wizard of
Oz when he finally was unmasked: he was still a humbug and gave out
fake hearts, fake diploma’s and worthless testimonials. There is a
deep lesson in that scene! If the aliens are maintaining a covert
operation, but then DO contact people, do they expect them to tell
them the truth? Sheesh! You’d think these big shots in the military
would figure THAT one out! It’s pretty standard intelligence
maneuvers! I think that Nexus Seven runs afoul of his objective,
unless his objective IS disinformation. I would like to know: what
is the possibility for Sirius to go supernova? A: Sirius is indeed a supernova candidate.
Q: Well, it’s about 8 light years away. I don’t think the human race
would survive that one! A: In the words of a wise philosopher: you would fry!
Q: (A) That’s a wise philosopher. (L) What is the likelihood of
Sirius doing the supernova number in the next hundred years or so?
A: Not good.
Q: So, we can forget that one for now. Okay, last session you
brought up the
subject of Frequency Resonance Vibration. You suggested that there
are certain
STS forces who are developing or creating or managing physical
bodies that they
are trying to increase the frequency in so that they will have
bodies that are
wired so that they can manifest directly into 3rd density, since
that seems to
be the real barrier that prevents an all-out invasion, the fact that
we are in
3rd density and they are in 4th. Now, I assumed that the same
function could be
true for STO individuals. It seems that many individuals who have
come into
this time period from the future, coming back into the past via the
incarnational cycle so as not to violate free will, have carefully
selected bodies with particular DNA, which they are, little by
little, activating so that there 4th density selves, or higher, can
manifest in this reality. Is it possible for those energies
to manifest into such bodies which have been awakened or tuned in 3rd
density? A: STO tends to do the process within the natural flow of things.
STS seeks to
alter creation processes to fit their ends.
Q: This Top Secret document and the Anna Hayes material to some
extent, both talk about many abductions being “ourselves from the
future” who have come back to the past, or what is for us, the
present, to abduct their own bodies to make genetic adjustments so
that they can advance and not make the mistakes they made in another
timeline. Is that, in fact, part of the scenario? A: Very close to the truth!
Q: Can you abduct yourself in an STO manner and help yourself in
this way? Can that be STO? A: It is not, because that is not STO.
Q: So, when that is happening, and if it is happening, it is
occurring in the STS parameter? A: Yes.
Q: How do the STO manage?
A: They do not concern themselves with such things.
Q: Well, if the STS guys are genetically tweaking themselves to have
some kind of different outcome for some reason that we do not
perceive, don’t you think there should be a balancing action on the
STO side of some sort? A: You are thinking in STS terms. But that is natural, since human
3rd density
is STS.
Q: You say they don’t concern themselves with that. What do STO
individuals coming back from the future into the past concern
themselves with? A: Answering calls for assistance with knowledge.
Q: What do these STS individuals coming back into the past hope to
do by genetically tweaking their ancestors? What happened that they
want to have happen differently? A: Infinite number of possible answers to that question.
Q: So, they are coming from all different timelines with all
different kinds of agendas - all designed to serve themselves. (J) I
was thinking along another line of questions. In 1995 I was in the
Great Pyramid and it appeared that the King’s chamber activated in
response to certain tones that we made. A: Pyramids constructed through sound wave focusing.
Q: (J) Did it respond? Did we activate it?
A: Yes. Not activate, stimulate. Block fell.
Q:
(J) We have been talking about moving in time, or at least out of
this time/space dimensional fix that we are in... Is this important
to continue? A: You have already experienced some of this in dribs and drabs. The
flash you
see signals “time portal opening.”
Q: Do you see a flash? (J) Maybe. I don’t remember one though.
A: Yes. Yes it is important to continue efforts. Found gene.
Q: Were you thinking something? (J) No. (A) There was the previous
question about whether it was important to continue... (J) The
intent was to ask if it was important to work with Time Technology.
A: We answered.
Q: (L) Found gene? Maybe you have a gene for it?
A: Laura, let it rest please.
Q: (L) Okay, I won’t say any more.
A: Who is Helen?
Q: (L) Well, nobody knows. Helen of Troy? Jon is not very talkative
tonight... A: He is tired and disconsolate.
Q:
Why? A: Reflective. Trying to find time travel, when it is nearly within
grasp with
some current and past associations.
Q: Is sound what is going to make the machine work?
A: Networking.
Q: Is the present design the foundation to start with?
A: We wish no further comment.
Q: I guess they are saying you are very close... (A) Just more
power... A: Leave this.
Q: Are we being monitored?
A: Maybe.
Q: (A) I want to know where this Nexus Seven comes from? Is it one
guy or a group? A: Group.
Q: Who are they associated with?
A: Hallinden.
Q: What is that? Hal Linden? We have this page in this Top Secret
document that says “decode this simple cipher key and super secrets
are available to you if you know how to slither.” Then, there is a
code, and a couple of hints. I would like to know if it is a joke or
if it is a real code? A: Code is geometric. Not a joke.
Q: What is the point of this code? If we decode it, do the guys in
the three piece suits come to our door? A: Only if you telegraph it.
Q: (A) What is the point of this code? A:
Exercise to gauge communicative potential interest.
Q: (A) Who is to gauge? A: Writer, et al.
Q: So, if somebody decodes it, and communicates to them that they
have decoded it, what would happen? A: If you contact group, you are “let in.”
Q: (A) Oh, I see. And the code is how to contact the group!
A: Close.
Q: (A) Do we want to be let in?
A: Up to you.
Q: Well, it says “slithery.” (A) We can decode just for fun! (L) I
want to ask my stock question. How come my stocks are all going
down? You told me to buy ‘em, I bought ‘em, and now they are all
going down. I’m losing my shirt here! A: No.
Q:
Then tell me what’s going to happen with the stock market!
A: It will be there.
Q: Swell! Are my stocks going to climb?
A: What do you think?
Q: I have no idea! Give me percentage... a probability. What is the
probability that I am going to be really happy with my stock picks
by December? A: 67 percent.
End of Session
Back to Contents
August 17, 2000
Q: Hello. A: Hello.
Q: And who do we have with us this evening?
A: Zallah.
Q: And where do you transmit through?
A: Cassiopaea.
Q: We received an email from some guy who says you guys are 5th
density STS,
dark forces, and all that. According to him, you are really leading
us down
the primrose path. It was a very upsetting email because he said
that
everything Ra said was absolutely the LAST WORD, and you guys are
chopped liver, so to say. I shouldn’t even ask about it... A:
No reason for upset.
Q: I know. But, he did suggest that Don Elkins committed suicide
because that was his pre-incarnative plan. Is suicide possibly part
of a plan made before incarnation? A: It is one of many choices available.
Q: In Don’s case, was it his plan to commit suicide at that point,
or did he commit suicide because he was under such extreme attack?
A: Well, his suicide was his choice
Q: Was it his choice before he incarnated? Was it mapped into this
incarnation? A: It is a choice open to all.
Q:
(A) I would like to know what was his reasoning. How did he
justify this choice to himself? A: It was an escape.
Q: An escape from what? A: Displeasure.
Q: Displeasure from whom? Himself or others?
A: Many things.
Q: What did this displeasure relate to?
A: Not important!
Q: Did he feel this displeasure from Carla?
A: See previous response.
Q: What was important about what was in his mind?
A: When one feels displeasure, one sometimes chooses to exit.
Q: So it was HIM who was feeling displeasure. Did he have no
pleasure in life? Was everything bleak and dark because of the
information they were bringing through? A: Laura, it is not necessary for you to probe further into this.
Q: If you guys were an STS 5th density source, obviously you would
not tell us the truth about whether you were or not. But, I don’t
think you are because so many things you have said have been
verified. But, on the other hand, you have said that the STS forces
have the ability to create confirming synchronicities to validate
their disinformation. So, having things validated is not necessarily
proof of STO orientation. I know it is a silly question, but how can
one identify a 5th density STS source? A: Not often communicative.
Q: My thought was that a 5th density STS being would be so
encapsulated, so contracted, that they would hardly bother to GIVE
anything... “give” being the operative word here. I would think that
such beings live only in thought and are simply not WILLING to
communicate. Is that correct? A: More or less.
Q: Well, a couple of weeks ago, we had Jon Cunnygham here. When we
sat down to have the session, and he was present, he was basically
unable to say a word. He later remarked on the fact of how unusual
it was that he was unable to speak. He was clearly almost paralyzed.
Can you tell us why? A: Jon is a fun type.
Q:
When you say that, what do you mean? A: Entertaining.
Q: Is he, as he believes, a 5th or 6th density soul who has come
into this reality to help us change the universe? A: By now, we feel your acquired knowledge is sufficient to answer
that
question for you.
Q: Okay, we have a woman coming on Wednesday to talk to us about
putting this book together. Her name is Bobbie Jensen, and her
company is called CasAnanda publishing. I do think we need some
professional advice and help on this project because we don’t want
it to look like we don’t know what we are doing. We could probably
muddle through, but... A: Maybe it is better if you do not know what you are doing.
Q: So, that almost makes me think that you think we ought to do it
ourselves,
even if we don’t know what we are doing. Maybe get a “how to” guide.
A: We feel you learn by observation, and, other ways too!
Q: Is trying to get the book out by January too soon, or should we
wait for the May show? A: When you schedule in matters such as this, not only do you bring
about
stress for yourselves, but you also may miss opportunities. It is
that old “anticipation” bug again you know!
Q: So, there may be something else in store that we don’t even know
about. A: We see exponentially building interest out there... Who knows
which parties
may step up to the “plate.”
Q: Will the investment club work out; will it be a binder of the
group or a source of contention? A: If everyone understands the mechanics, there is no contention. by
the way,
you must be an impatient investor! Good things happen to those who
have patience and avoid anticipation.
Q: What do you mean good things happen to those who are patient and
avoid anticipation. I would just like to be able to buy more stocks
and I don’t have the money. A: Oh yes, a wee bit... and money flows from unexpected sources.
Q: Our little egroup discussion list is growing. Everyone is talking
about the Wave: what does it mean, what is it, when is it coming,
how are we going to be able to tell, and so on. I have been
collecting the material and getting it in shape. I have been
learning a lot as I go along as well. It isn’t finished, but as I go
along, I do have some questions. We would like to have a little bit
of a clue about the progress of the wave. I would also like to know
if this Wave is sort of like the recompiling of a computer program,
with the universe as the program? What is the progress, and is it
going the recompile the program of our universe? A: So many questions rolled up into one. But, one way it might go is
that all
of a sudden, everything that ever was is new, everything that IS is
new, and everything that will be is new. Programs change, oh we
suppose, what an awesome event indeed!
Q: Is it important for the information about the potential making
new of everything and the awareness of the state of the planet as it
is now, or the state of the universe, be shared and spread so that
as many people as possible will be aware at the point of the arrival
of the wave so that it makes it more likely that beneficial changes
will occur, that the universe will change in a positive way? Or is
that simply not even important. It will change the way it is going
to change no matter what anybody does? A: Closer to 2nd criterion.
Q: In other words, we are doing what we are doing, and it doesn’t
really matter what we are doing. The Wave will happen, everything
will change, become new, and that’s that? A: What matters most is what others are doing, have done and will
do.
Q: Who are these others that it matters most what they have done,
are doing and will do? A: Program rewriters, i.e. you and us in the future.
Q: So, what we have done, what we are doing, what we will do - WE -
is important? I think that I missed something. I thought you said
that what we were doing simply didn’t matter. A: You are/will be others.
Q: Okay, how is what we are doing now helping or hindering this
process? A: No help/hinder, just is.
Q: So, this has all been done before? It’s a foregone conclusion how
it is going to turn out? It’s a done deal? A: No Laura, stop your linearishness!
Q: I don’t understand. Is what we are doing making a difference?
A: What is “time?”
Q: Time is an illusion. (A) Is doing also an illusion?
A: If you are thinking in linear “time” terms.
Q: In other words, the best way for an STO future to manifest is for
us not to
anticipate that ANYTHING we do will matter. Because, if we are
anticipating that what we do will make a difference, it won’t. It is
wanting. (A) I can’t stop thinking that my working is going to be
useful! (L) I can’t stop what I am doing either because it is what I
DO. It is being ME. We have to stop anticipating. We do what is in
us to do without expecting it to matter. A: And you do it because you are directing you to do it from another
plane of
existence where you know the score. Where you are on your present
awareness plane, you are largely, though not completely, scoreless
and clueless.
Q: So, it is from another level of reality that we
create THIS reality? A: Close.
Q: How much input do we have from this level of reality regarding
the creation of a future reality, and I use the term “future”
loosely, but meaning “future” as we perceive it from this reality?
How much input? A: About as much awareness as a small child does when contemplating
how to fly the plane they are riding on.
Q: Well, you have talked about the Wave before, and I complained
that we did not have time to do certain things that you had
suggested that we do. You said that, yes we would, and that these
things were suggested to “prepare” us for this event. Just trying to
deal with it from a linear point of view, we still have to build
this pool with the columns, get a Nobel prize, supposedly, work with
people on the crop circles, and all that. Are we still looking at
doing these things in this linear time progression that we exist in;
that we are aware of as small children on a very large plane?
A: If you let it flow, it will flow.
Q: So, you are us in the future, we are you in the past - when you
say this, are you “us” in the future in the sense of ALL mankind, or
in the sense of any particular group of mankind? A: In between those limited options.
Q: Could you be more explicit? A: No, because you wold not “get it.”
Q: When I post material on the website, those people who resonate to
the material believe that this refers to them also. I have been of
the opinion that Unified Thought Form being must mean a very large
group as represented in this density. I know that we are dealing
with limiting terms. But, is this applied to people who CHOOSE the
Cassiopaean option? A: Maybe it is best to say it applies to those who recognize the
application.
Q: So, if they recognize it, if they know it is them, they are part
of it. (A)
But, thinking in nonlinear terms, its up to us to work to make this
precise. You are asking this question which implies that the answer
exists. But, exactly what the answer is may be it is not yet chosen,
and it is up to us to make it this way. A: Lodestar is a clue for you.
Q: I guess that means a guiding star of some sort. Something that
attracts... a lodestone is magnetic, it is where the compass points.
In the myth, Cassiopaea, Danae, and Athena work together to enable
Perseus to cut off the head of the Gorgon and kill the sea monster
and rescue Andromeda. Of all the mythical heroes, Perseus stands out
because he was SUCCESSFUL. He went on the quest, he succeeded in the
mission, he freed the maiden in distress, killed a slew of Lizzie
types, balanced the situation in his environment, and then even
lived happily ever after. He didn’t lose his reason, he didn’t
fail... it is about the only really successful myth. He DID it. And
did it well. Is that... A: A quest is successfully followed one step at a time. No need to
gauge the
staircase.
Q: The only point I was trying to make was that maybe the only
reason for the Cassiopaean connection, maybe even for the term
“Cassiopaea,” is that it is the archetype of the function... A:
That is good, planning book fairs? Maybe not so good. We shall
see!
Q: You guys, just basically, from the whole start of this thing
about a book, have basically hinted that there is something else in
store, and that we should not even try to do that... A: We have not said that that is not the way. We have hinted that
the way will
become clear when it is necessary.
Q: (A) I think that it is good to have an external pressure to make
things happen. Composers, like Mozart, had to be under pressure to
produce. There should be pressure. We need to have income to build
this pool and other things. So, if we put it into the indefinite
future... (L) But they said money will come from unexpected sources.
I don’t know where or how that can possibly be. But YOU were
certainly unexpected! I would have dreamed of YOU! (A) Well, there may be another unexpected millionaire may come to
replace me! (L) Nobody could replace YOU! (A) How else shall we explain this
unexpected money? A: No need to explain, or expect either, silly! You should know that
the one
time that Mozart wrote music under external pressure he quickly
transited to 5th density.
Q: (A) Well I know that I work best under standard external
pressure. A: No, because you only sometimes think it is external, but it is
not really.
When you have been “treated” to external pressure, you have
rebelled.
Q: (A) Okay. UFT. This is one of these things that I don’t
know what it is good for, because the Wave will erase everything and
make everything new. Yet, it is in me, so let me ask. I don’t know
what it is good for, but I want to do it. Einstein was working on
his UFT for like 30 years. Maybe more. He was changing his methods.
At some point, did he realize that he found a solution? During all
these thirty years, was there a point where he came upon the right
solution? A: Yes, but sadly, his solution for UFT largely erased TOR.
Q: (A) Once he found this solution, did he reject it because it
erased TOR? A: No. His progenitors sealed it, in order to keep intact the status
quo.
Q: (L) His progenitors? Isn’t that your parents?
A: Other definitions apply.
[A source from which something
develops.]
Q: (A) Can we have an idea of which year Einstein found the solution
that erases TOR? A: Sure, it was 1938.
Q: (A) According to what I know, between 35 and 38 there was a
period in which Einstein published nothing. In 38, he published a
paper with Bergman which was a revival of Kaluza Klein theory. That
was exactly 1938. So, I guess that was the paper that was close.
A: Can you obtain a copy?
Q: (A) Yes, I have a copy.
A: Good!!! Clues abound within.
Q: (A) What I do not understand is why, a few years later, he
completely abandoned that and started working very hard on a
completely different solution. If he knew... A: Was under control.
Q: (A) Can you control somebody and make him spend years.... Oh!
Mind control! They got him! A: Why do you think he emigrated to the United States in the first
place?
Q: (A) Well, that is not a surprise. He was a Nobel Prize winner and
America was getting together every possible Nobel Prize winner, and
also there was the persecution of the Jews, so it was natural.
A: More to it than that. What about Freud?
Q:
(L) I guess they didn’t want Freud! He didn’t know anything about
UFT! (A) Now, aparently Von Neumann was also involved in application of
UFT. But, Von Neumann was, as far as we know, doing a completely
different kind of mathematics. He didn’t even really know geometry,
differential geometry. He was doing completely different things. So
how come the UFT that was discovered by Einstein, involved Von
Neumann. What did Von Neumann contribute to this project? A:
Von Neumann was one of three overseers at Princeton with level 7
security
clearance, and a clear budget request permittance.
Q: (L) My question is, about Von Neumann, as I understand it, Von
Neumann was supposed to have been involved with the creation of a
time machine, right? A: Yes.
Q: (L) Did he succeed in such a project?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Well, why was it that, when he developed a brain tumor and
realized he was going to die - and I read that he screamed and
yelled like a baby when he knew there was no hope - if he was
somebody who had access to a time machine, why wasn’t he able to do
something about it instead of carrying on like a madman? The stories
about his screams echoing all over the place, are horrible. He
realized that his great mind was going to soon be still; if he had
access to a time machine, one would think that he would have used
it, would have pulled every string he could, to forestall his own
death. A: No Laura, it does not work that way. And besides, if you had a
brain tumor,
you could be forgiven for a few mental peculiarities too!
Q: (L) I
just don’t understand why, when he knew he was sick, that he didn’t
just use the time machine to go forward in time for a cure, or
backward in time to correct something in his past... A: The time machine was not his property.
Q: (L) So, they got what they needed from him and let him die. (A)
It is not clear. He got this cancer so suddenly, it may even have
been induced. (L) Well, that’s a thought. (A) It is said that when
he was dying, his brain was working perfectly and that was his
tragedy. He could think, he could produce, he was a genius. (L) What
happened to him after he died? A: 5th density.
Q: (L) Well, I figured THAT! (A) At a previous time when we were
talking about UFTs, my different options that I was trying to
suggest, you told me to pursue the subject of torsion. All these
Russians speak of torsion. Now, Einstein’s 1938 paper is a Kaluza
Klein paper - no torsion. What is the story about torsion? A:
Clues hidden in the text.
Q: (A) Is there anything about Jason that we should do or think, in
terms of his safety. We got the other car with the airbag. Is there
anything else we need to consider regarding his safety? A:
Only his overactive libido.
Q: (L) Well, what are we supposed to do about that? You said that
this was going to resolve itself. A: Yes, but there may be bumps in the road.
Q: (L) Anything we can say to him, any chemical agent we can give to
him... something we can do about this? A: No.
Q:
When you say “bumps in the road,” what exactly do you mean by
that? A: Wait and see.
Q: (L) Anything else about Jason or the other kids?
A: No.
Q: We got a call from Anna tonight who wanted to talk to Arielle on
her birthday. I heard from Jason that the girls got mad at grandma
and moved out because grandma showed the Times article to Aletheia’s
boyfriend and Aletheia is now no longer speaking to grandma. I would
really like to know if that child is possessed with a demon? I think
that is pretty extreme! A: She learns at her pace.
Q: (L) We did get some emails from Ark’s daughter awhile back, and
she was posing a whole bunch of specious questions and trying to
trap Ark into some kind of philosophical trickery and theoretical
situations. It was clear that it was designed as a trap, and that
she was going to snap it shut on him and tear him to shreds. She was
using her own self as the case. She invented a semi-mythical person
who “might be the one,” but she could be wrong, and if she was wrong
once, she could be wrong again, and so on and on. It was such a
story. We wrote back to her and told her that if she had all these
questions about her new guy, then he was obviously NOT the one. So,
she wrote back and told us he got killed in an automobile crash
within a few hours of our saying this cruel and terrible thing. Now,
we were terrible people. Did she have this other boyfriend as
presented? A: Manipulations go psssst.
Q: (L) So, the only thing that got wrecked were her plans to
manipulate.
There was no guy getting killed? A: See last response.
Q: In other words, her manipulations went psssst!
A: Close. At least it should. i.e. the less energy expended, the
better.
Q: (L) What was her motivation? At first I thought it was true, then
I realized that it was a game. I just reminded me of Anna. A:
Maybe she likes to yank your chain. Goodbye.
End of Session
Back to Contents
|