January 10, 2002
From
Perceval Website
Some
background to the January 10, 2002 session
On Tuesday, January 8, 2002, Vincent Bridges wrote a message to a
public message board in which he made many absurd and provably false
claims that I won't even repeat since they were simply more of the
same lies he has repeatedly told and which have repeatedly been
shown as lies with hard evidence.
Following all of these libelous claims, he then announced that if,
"Laura and Ark had just taken all mention of me down from the site,
as I requested repeatedly, I would have been quite willing to let
the whole thing drop."
What Vincent Bridges never seemed to understand was the fact that he
had NEVER requested that we take all mention of him down from our
site. He had threatened, manipulated, and attempted to intimidate us
with lies repeatedly. But never, EVER, once did he "ask." What's
more, never, ever, did he apologize for his previous lies and
manipulations, including the dozens of lies uncovered in our
investigation into his background. Indeed, we did refuse to be
manipulated, intimidated, and threatened.
Since Mr. Bridges case was one of the
first full investigations conducted by Perseus Foundation, which
states on the Mission Page:
Our most immediate and practical
goal is to investigate claims of the many Purveyors of Knowledge
& Wisdom and "inside info" who flood the worldwide web. We
believe that, just as Perseus cut off the head of Medusa, if
there are any Medusas out there in cyberspace, we intend to find
them out, cutting off their power to deceive and to disinform.
We intend to investigate their attempts toward reality control
by irresponsible rumors or the terror tactics of millennial doom.
Not only does truth set us free, lies manipulate our emotions
and perpetuate illusions. We’ll use every ethical means
available to investigate the credentials and claims of the many
individuals promoters selling books, tapes, teachings, seminars
and other wares. We intend to gather information to reveal the
identities and the methods of those who promote rumors and
disinformation.
...to have allowed him to intimidate the
Foundation into giving in to terror tactics would have effectively
destroyed any credibility that we mean business, and that we follow
through on what we have set as a goal. In essence, his personal
attacks against us, rather than addressing the Foundation that
produced the report, researched and put together by a team, amounted
to a concerted effort against Freedom of the Press.
Vincent Bridges seems to be unable to comprehend the difference
between lies and truth. The Perseus Foundation Report was researched
thoroughly, and if he is accusing it of being false, then he is
accusing a lot of people of being liars who clearly have no reason
to lie. His quadruple-morphed story after the Truth was exposed did
nothing to address the fact that his original bio and credentials
were ALL LIES.
He has repeatedly accused us of "libel, slander, defamation of
character, cyber-stalking," etc, in the true manner of the psychopath
who always accuses their target of what they themselves are doing.
He began to accuse us of "blackmailing" his former co-author,
Jay
Weidner which follows the psychological profile exactly and we
should have known that he was effectively announcing his next
maneuver.
As the latest attempt to stifle truth, Mr. Bridges then declared,
that he was going to "publicly address the Cassiopaean Cult issue
and tell the real, unedited version of the story." He then announced
that he was going into the business of distributing our copyrighted
work free to anyone who wanted it. This was accompanied by
nonsensical lies that only "he" understood how to interpret it, and
the further claim that we were deceptively "altering" the text and
had been "from the beginning." Well, since he is not in possession
of either the original tapes, or the notes, we wondered on what
"facts" he based such claims.
There were other "follow up" posts, but I won't bore the reader with
the endless prevarications and nonsense. The bottom line was this:
Mr. Bridges illegally, published the complete unedited transcripts
without any care or concern for any of the private individuals who
had attended sessions, many of whom had specifically requested that,
at any point in time when the material was published, their names
and identities should be removed or disguised.
As we noted on our own page where the transcripts are available, it
was the work of removing names and sensitive items that proper
respect and regard for other human beings mandated, that held up the
publication, along with the necessity of going back and checking the
transcribed material with the notes and tapes to ensure its
accuracy. It was and is an enormous job. In some cases, we have done
global file replacement, which has resulted in areas of file
distortion, but in no case is this an intentional obfuscation.
Little by little, we have been working to correct the errors in the
transcripts, and this takes time.
So, the point was not the distribution of the material, which we
give away free here on the site ourselves, the point was concern for
the privacy of people who had entrusted their privacy into our care,
as well as our legal right to ensure that the transcripts are
accurate, or to make sure that appropriate notes or comments are
appended when we are not sure.
Knowing that it was futile to appeal to Mr. Bridges to have concern
for other people's privacy, we directly addressed the owners of the
server via email and FAX.
Apparently in response to our request to the server that the
transcripts be removed, Mr. Bridges sent the following email which
included a startling message from "Frank Scott" - a former member of
our group:
Date sent: Thu, 10 Jan 2002
13:06:34 -0500
Subject: FW: Permission Granted!
From: Vincent Bridges <abooks@ac.net>
Unless you want the entire sordid saga published, you might
think of taking my name down.
Vincent
From: "Frank Scott"
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 04:15:49 EST
To: abooks@ac.net
Subject: Permission Granted!
Hi Vincent:
I will now make the following statement on your behalf:
My name is "Frank Grant Scott". I give full and complete
permission to Vincent Bridges to publish in full or in part
the Cassiopaean transcripts in the way that he chooses and
for whatever purposes that he deems appropriate.
I participated in all of the sessions that took place
between July, 1994 and November, 2000. My participation in
the channeling sessions was to an extent as great as or
greater than that of any and all other participants.
Thank You,
"Frank Grant Scott"
Aside from the fact that Frank's claim that his participation in the
channeling sessions was "to an extent as great as or greater than
that of any and all other participants," is an outright lie, the
legal fact is that the transcripts have been copyrighted by me from
the day that I printed out the first copy back in 1994. That is the
LEGAL fact.
Any and all witnesses (of which there are MANY), as well as the hard
evidence, shows that Frank's "permission to publish" is as valid as
permission from Garfield the Cat. He does not, and NEVER DID, have
any copyright "rights." All channeling was done in OUR house, on OUR
equipment, recorded by us personally, MY voice; we OWN the tapes, we
transcribed nearly every word, we burned the CD that Mr. Bridges
obtained from us by fraud.
In short, Mr. Scott's presence at the sessions was the ONLY thing he
EVER contributed, and there were a lot of other people present at
different times. Being a guest in our house does not constitute
owning what we produce there!!!!
Even though Mr. Bridges was clearly attempting to blackmail us, and
we knew it, we were only concerned about the innocent people who
wished to have their identities and personal information removed.
What was more, the remark about the "entire sordid saga" didn't make
a lot of sense so we dismissed it.
As it happens, the Universe is on the alert. Later that day, I
received an email from Jay Weidner who remarked that Mr. Bridges
"says that he has 'proof' that you attempted to murder someone." It
all became chillingly clear. I instantly understood that it was,
indeed true, that Frank had written the above letter (which I had
initially doubted because I was quite certain that Frank knew enough
about the law to not do something that stupid), and why.
Those readers who have read Amazing Grace will surely recall the
chapter where I describe "Frank's" long years of embezzling funds
from his former employer which, at the end, caused his father's
death, and the part I played in that debacle. For those of you who
have not read it, you may wish to have a look at the chapter That's
Hollywood!
The chapters subsequent to that explain how I reconciled
myself to the event, how I "explained it away," and essentially put
full confidence in Frank that he had learned a significant lesson,
and that he needed to be trusted in order to be trustworthy. After
all, that is what we are taught, isn't it? So, I trusted him.
And I
confided in him a number of things, including the story of an event
that happened to me when I was 17/18 years old, which Vincent
Bridges was now planning to use, according to his friend, Jay
Weidner, in an attempt to force us to remove the accurate report
about his "career."
When I received the email from the person who remarked that Vincent
Bridges "says that he has 'proof' that you attempted to murder
someone," along with Mr. Bridges attempt to blackmail us by saying
he was going to tell "the entire sordid saga," what I realized was
the utter and absolute perfidy of Frank behind it - that he was,
effectively, party to yet another criminal act that is almost the
same as the embezzling he did from his former employer - because
ONLY Frank could have been the one to share this information with
Vincent Bridges.
What is more, it was clear that Frank was the source
of the libelous claims that we have been "altering the texts" of the
transcripts from the beginning. We find this to be more than odd,
since one of the early things we noted about Frank was the fact that
he never seemed to be aware of what the Cassiopaeans said, and would
discourse for hours about issues in which everything he said was in
complete contradiction to their messages.
At one point, I provided
him with a printed copy of the text so he could read it, but it
became apparent that he was either not reading it, or that he could
not comprehend it, because he continued to pronounce "knowingly" on
many subjects from a totally opposite viewpoint. It was clear that
the channeling from the Cassiopaeans was NOT coming from Frank.
Frank claimed to be "the channel," and the "only" channel, and
repeatedly wanted us to convert the channeling from using the board
to direct trance channeling with HIM as the only source. On the
several occasions we tried it, we found that the "personality" and
"feeling" of the contact was so distinctly different - and in fact,
repellant - that we realized that this suggestion was the maneuver
of
the STS forces to take over the work completely. (Here is a
sample of Frank's "direct channeling on his own.")
So, just as it was with his former employer, Frank did as little
work as possible, and thought that he was entitled to a whole lot
more than he actually earned, and just decided to write himself a
weekly check. Well, Frank is trying to write himself another check
on somebody else's account.
Considering the evidential fact that he has now chosen a path of
deliberate disregard for the legal rights of others, his
participation in an attempt to blackmail, extort, and coerce us, any
further statements from "Frank Scott" must be considered to be
emanating from the same source as Vincent Bridges .
Vincent Bridges
has demonstrated total disregard for the truth, for the Free Will
rights of others, and he has clearly established that he believes
that the readers are too lazy to check things for themselves. He has
also made it evident that his philosophy is the bigger the lie, and
the more often it is repeated, the greater the likelihood that the
public will believe it. In short: they have nothing but contempt for
other human beings.
It is in the context of the above information that the following
session was held.
January 10, 2002
Q: Hello.
A: Hello.
Q: And who do we have with us this evening?
A: Fiaage.
Q: And where do you transmit through?
A: Cassiopaea.
Q: As you know, we have become aware this evening of Frank's
extraordinary conversion to the dark side. Is that an accurate
way of perceiving it?
A: Close enough.
Q: Quite a few years ago, there were several remarks made on two
or three occasions regarding Frank's battle with the Dark
Forces, and the issue of whether or not he would be able to
resist their domination. Was it always known that he would fail?
A: He is not a failure.
Q: What do you mean?
A: From the perspective of STS he is a success.
Q: Why was it that we were able to channel STO material, with
Frank being so borderline regarding this ultimate choice between
STS and STO?
A: He was programmed for the specific purpose of "downloading"
from you secrets coded into you before birth of your present
body. He failed because you were incorruptible. He is now
charged with the mission, in concert with Vincent Bridges, of
destroying your ability to accomplish your mission.
Q: Well, that means that there is a strong possibility that the
material that came through while Frank was a participant was
very likely corrupted. Is that why you gave the figure of 72
percent purity of the material regarding those sessions?
A: Yes.
Q: So, are you saying that Frank's presence produced that 30
percent corruption?
A: Yes.
Q: What was the form that most of that corruption took? Can we
identify it?
A: Predictions and terror tactics.
Q: What is the advisable course of action to take at this point
in time? Shall I stop what I am doing and take time to deal with
the issues that have come up as a result of this action by Frank
and Vincent?
A: Good idea to deal with it A.S.A.P.
Q: Should we also pursue legal action?
A: Yes, in terms of copyright.
Q: What about the stalking, harassment, defamation, blackmail?
A: It will be handled at the proper time by you, and you will
know when to do it.
Q: (A) Why isn't ignoring them completely not the answer?
A: Because they are not affected by being ignored. And your
reality is such that lies and liars have prevailed in violating
Free Will for millennia. They do this most effectively by
programs that are designed to perpetuate it, such as "Turn the
other cheek," and "If you ignore it, it will go away." Give what
is asked for by a lie: Truth.
Q: So, it comes back to balance. In the face of a lie, balance
is only restored by Truth. Well, now, let me ask this: did Terry
contribute positive energy at the board?
A: Most of the time.
Q: Was that the reason that you encouraged Terry and Jan to be
present? To counterbalance Frank's negative energy?
A: Yes. Frank would have killed you with his STS draining rather
soon otherwise.
Q: Is that why I (and everyone else) always felt so tired after
some sessions and he always felt so energized?
A: Yes.
Q: He was literally sucking my energy out of me?
A: Yes.
Q: Is that why I had so many health problems during that period
of time?
A: Yes.
Q: Well, yes, the evidence was all there. The problem was, not
being able to interpret it. Of course, one believes the lies,
and Frank was very good at it. He was a consummate liar. And I
already had the evidence of what a capable deceiver he was from
observing his interactions with NE and other people, including
his embezzlement of funds. But I chose to ignore it because I
thought I could help him. I thought that our mutual interest in
this project would help him as much as it would help me. And you
are saying that the whole thing was set up, with all the
synchronicities at the beginning, just for the purpose of
getting me involved in this channeling experiment, to make the
channeling experiment 72 percent positive, so that I would be
encouraged to continue it, so that Frank could, more or less,
vacuum out of me, from some level of consciousness, other
information, and kill me. Is that what we are getting at here?
A: Pretty much.
Q: That's depressing. Why do all these people hate Ark so much?
A: Because Ark won't allow them to regard you as an object to
use for their own nefarious purposes.
Q: In other words, it looks like Frank dropped out just as the
time that Vincent moved in. Vincent was the new "agent." He
spent his time getting close so that he could come and attempt
to extract the same information that Frank had failed to get,
only the new plan was to try to use hypnosis. Is that what the
plan was?
A: Yes.
Q: Who is pulling the strings behind this whole thing?
A: It is better not to know specifics. But a clue: STS
Consortium.
Q: I would really like to have some knowledge that would protect
in this situation. I would like to know what actions to take,
some inside information, something that would help us. Here we
are, these guys keep us just constantly upset. Is this the way
it is going to continue to be from here on out?
A: Not to worry, reinforcements are on the way.
Q: I sure wish they would show up now! We could use the cavalry.
I mean, here we are, the wagon train is drawn up in a circle, we
are surrounded by Outlaws, we are down to our last few silver
bullets; you keep telling us that we aren't supposed to worry,
that reinforcements are on the way, and so forth, and we just
keep hanging in there, working, working, working, and I don't
see anything materializing here. I think we ought to just sell
the house and retire.
A: Not yet!
Q: (A) I want to ask about my theory about why walking is so
important - that when one thinks while walking, one is able to
evade mind control signals which are directed or reinforced when
one remains static. Is there anything to this?
A: Close.
Q: (L) I want to know what caused my ear infection?
A: Stress.
Q: Should I continue to keep Frank informed in an effort
encourage him to see the hole he is about to fall into? I can't
help but feel sorry for him.
A: He is going to fall in the hole anyway. So, why prolong the
agony?
Q: What hole do you mean?
A: Suicidal thoughts; since he does not have the STO motivation
to help others without an agenda, which gives staying power to
those of the STO persuasion to survive great troubles.
Q: Well, then it seems to me that he ought to avoid getting into
such troubles.
A: He can't.
Q: Why?
A: Drives.
Q: What kind of drives?
A: Programmed in by parental abuse and neglect.
Q: Well, if you could say anything to Frank just now, would you
want to?
A: No.
Q: But ought I not to feel grateful to Frank for his
participation, helping me groove the channel?
A: That was not his agenda.
Q: (A) We would like to know if it is recommended that we
transcribe and publish the "mirror session" with Vincent
Bridges, as part of the Truth that needs to be made known?
A: Yes! All Truth is beneficial and promotes balance in a world
dominated and run on lies
Q: (L) Yes, but when you start telling the truth in a world
dominated and run by lies, the liars go absolutely crazy in
trying to destroy you! That is the plain hard fact that we have
been facing. It is unbelievable to strip away the lies; layer
after layer of lies, the liars themselves, impossible to
conceive how they can lie the way they do; I am just utterly
astonished by it.
A: Yes. It is part of your mission.
Q: (A) Well, I am wondering if the way I am managing these
attacks is the proper STO approach? For example, I have blocked
his access to the website. I have removed his entries to the
guestbook. I have removed him from the egroup. I am just simply
making his mission of spreading lies difficult. But I am not
completely sure if this is an STO approach?
A: It is.
Q: (L) Well, I think he has the perfect right to tell all the
lies he wants in the places where lies are wanted and asked for.
He does not have the right to trespass on our space and tell
lies because we do not ask for lies, we don't want lies, and it
violates our Free Will to try to discover truth in our space. He
has the Matrioshka list that obviously wants to hear his lies.
They make no effort to discern truth in any way, and they
certainly got very upset when Ark posted truth on their list,
which only gave them a small sample of how it feels to have your
free will violated. He can tell all the lies he wants where they
are wanted. Any other suggestions?
A: Just persist and be patient.
Q: Is there anything we can do to accelerate the receiving of
assistance?
A: It is on the way.
Q: [Laughter.] I know that time does not exist on 6th density.
However, all these months dealing with these lunatics seems like
six years, or six thousand years. Well, I'm just whining.
A: Either way it will come. "Miles to go before you sleep." Keep
on going. Destination will be reached.
Q: (L) Anything else we ought to know that we haven't asked?
A: Not for now. Goodnight.
End of Session
Back to Contents
February 23, 2002
Ark, Laura, BT, RO, VG, J&MN
Q: (L) Hello.
A: Yes. Hello.
Q: (L) And who do we have with us this evening?
A: Fiilia.
Q: (L) And where do you transmit through?
A: Yes. Cassiopaea.
Q: (L) They're not use to having so many people. Alright who
wants to start off? (group silence) Well then I'll start off!
Did you have a question? (B) Is there any correlation to the
names ending in "A" or sounding like "A" that has been discussed
on the list? (L) Correlation to what? (B) The veracity of the
source. (L) Ah!
A: Close, generates frequency.
Q: (B) Is the lack of that an indicator of anything?
A: Can be indicative of fractured energy.
Q: (V) Huh. (B) One of the people on the list had made an
indication that the sessions that had seemed most accurate were
delivered from a "name" that either end in an "A" or ended in a
combination of vowels that had an "A" sound in the English
language. At the same time, some of the sessions that seemed a
bit off, including a consideration of Frank's involvement didn't
have that. (L) Alright, ask your question V. (V) Is the DG that
called me Dec.1 in fact my husband/ex-husband that I have not
seen for 22 years?
A: Yes.
Q: (V) Wow.
A: Check records. Health issue.
Q: (V) He has a health issue?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Well why else would he be calling you? (V) Is this a
health issue that may have some genetic ramifications for my
son?
A: No.
Q: (V) So, he's feeling really crappy about dissin' us for 22
years. I'm not asking, that's just...
A: No.
Q: (V) Why should that surprise me (laughter)! Well, should
we...
A: Whiner.
Q: (V) Who's a whiner? I'm a whiner? (L) No. You asked about
him. (V) Oh. Health issue...his health issue is whining? I'm
still rushing from the fact that it was actually him that
called. I'm going to be really honest - and I'm in a room full
of strangers here that don't really know me - but my husband
left when my son was a few months old and there was no support
from that point in time, no financial support whatsoever. I've
really wrestled with myself since Dec. 1. I've never called the
number back and there was no message. A part of me wants to take
him to Civil Court and...
A: Waste of time.
Q: (V) Okay. Is he remarried?
A: No.
Q: (V) He never filed for a divorce?
A: No.
Q: (J) You're still married to him. (V) I never divorced because
I figured it was my safety clause--if I was married I couldn't
do that again.
A: Fill life with joy at his absence.
Q: (V) Okay. (L) It could've been so much worse. (V) Oh I know,
God! Good Lord, it was just a struggle, it wasn't a hammer on
the head so...
A: Release and rejoice.
Q: (V) Is he dying?
A: Not yet (burst of laughter in the room).
Q: (J) Can I ask my question? (L) Go ahead. (DN) Are 'The Allies
of Humanity' a valuable resource?
A: All is of value if examined with an open mind and proper
perspective.
Q: (L) You can get more specific, you know: vague in, vague out.
The hardest thing about the process is thinking about the
question. (V) Well, just from reading the table of contents of
this Allies of Humanity book, it looks like they're trying to
define a lot of subject matter, they're trying to define what is
God, what is... (DG) Spiritual.
A: Or from their perspective.
Q: (V) Where does the information emanate from?
A: Channeled.
Q: (V) Channeled by who? (JN) Channeled by Marshall Summers. (V)
But who is it that is channeling through Marshall Summers? (JN)
The Allies of Humanity. (V) You are missing my point. That's a
name they give themselves. I want to know: what kind of source
are they?
A: 4th density.
Q: (V) STS, STO?
A: STO predominates.
Q: (V) Well that's cool.
A: Keep in mind that the 4th density STO perspective has a
tendency to exclude certain factors by virtue of choice of realm
frequency. This means that the lesson profile of 4th density STO
is to enhance the energy by association in networks that do not
include ongoing contact with STS, and so their perspective is on
the positive STO experience.
Q: (R) So they can choose realms as frequencies or such where
they do not have contact with STS because STS are not of the
same frequency. (L) At 4D, those who graduate to STO are working
on enhancement of what is already a choice rather than the
problem of making the choice. It's there, it's made, it's done.
(R) This has to go back to the question that you started with
about Allies from 4D because, it's "all is of value if examined
with a open mind and proper perspective." From our perspective,
any help that we would get from 4D STO includes the fact that we
have to keep in mind that they don't have to deal with things
that we do. (L) Right. (R) So any help that we get from them, we
will have to add the extra context...(L) Of our reality.
A: First awareness of the choice comes. Then making the choice.
Then enhancing the energy to graduate. The problem of 3rd
density is identifying what to choose, since so much is veiled
from you.
Q: (R) This goes right to the discussion we had on the egroup a
couple of weeks ago, I think, when we said that there is so much
that is possible, but if you don't know about it you won't
choose it. How can you choose if you don't know about it? (B)
The choice has to be made here before you can glean the benefits
of that choice. (L) Right. If you don't know you have a choice
you can't make a choice, if everything is...(R) It's like the
gold fish in the bad water. (L) Yeah. Yeah, I mean you learn to
exist in that environment and you accommodate it and you don't
know how to be in any other. Okay, next. (R) Can I do some
personal thing? It is about my now ex-girlfriend. I'm a little
bit worried about her because she is really afraid of the dark
and she doesn't want to talk about it really and I'm just really
curious what the cause of it is.
A: When it becomes a sufficiently debilitating issue, she will
talk about it.
Q: (JN) Is that a polite way of saying it's none of your
business?
A: Perhaps the cause is the concern it engenders.
Q: (V) She's creating her own darkness? She's perpetuating her
own...(J) Fear of the unknown. (R) Yes. Oh yes. Absolutely. (V)
She's doing it to herself. In other words maybe it wasn't
something like she was locked in a dark closet when she was a
kid. (R) Actually that's what she says. (V) Oh (laughter)! (R)
That's what she said. I just didn't believe her. It just seems
so extreme that...(V) Have you met her parents? (R) Sure. (L)
Would they do that? (R) No, no her kid brother locked her...(JN)
Yeah I was going to say that sounds like something a brother
would do. (V) My brother used to do some crappy stuff to me too
(giggling). (R) Okay, so he chased her into the bathroom and
closed the door and the light switch was on the outside. I was
curious if that was really...(V) Yeah but there's more to it
than just that. (R) So this seems to say that she perpetuates,
she enhances that herself and until it becomes a real problem
she'll have it. (L) Well it is a handy thing to have to get
sympathy. (J) She's holding onto it for some reason (V) Drama,
drama, drama. Very dramatic. It caused you to be dramatic
towards her, didn't it? (R) Well, no, it is just, yeah, I always
had to...(J) You had to leave the light on. (R) Exactly.
A: Shakespeare said it: Sound and fury signifying nothing.
Q: (L) I think we ought to check the whole quote at some point
and see what all he was saying. I'm not a Shakespeare person.
(V) From what work is this quote? (L) I just want you all to
know I am not a Shakespeare fan so...knock it off (laughter as
she speaks this to the board)! (V) Can you tell us what
Shakespearean work this is from so it can be further...
A: Tempest.
[It's actually from Macbeth:
Out, out, brief candle!
Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage
And then is heard no more: it is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
The Tempest contains the following:
We are such stuff
As dreams are made on; and our little life
Is rounded with a sleep.
Which conveys a similar meaning, but in different words.
Obviously, the C's are not Shakespeare fans.]
Q: (R) Alright, I think I'm done with this, I'm okay with the
answers. (V) I'll ask something unless someone else was ready to
go. Twice maybe in the last 3 or 4 years - once at USF and once
in my apartment - I was walking along and all of the sudden the
environment had totally changed and it was like I was a light
person. Can you tell me what that was?
A: 4D bleed through. We mentioned before that you ought to get
used to it.
Q: (V) Well, it is not a "getting used to thing." It only
happened twice and it was magnificent. I mean it was an
experience. I can say now that I am experienced. (laughter) (L)
And not Jimmy Hendrix! (V) Is there any way to generate this
myself? It was just so spontaneous?
A: STS do that.
Q: (V) Do what? (L) Seek to generate such experiences for the
sake of the experience. (R) Bring it on through the matrix,
through technology, rituals, drugs, whatever. (JN) What were you
smoking at the time (laughter)? (V) Yeah, right. So is there a
positive or negative aspect to this?
A: Not unless you are not experienced! [L's laughing hard
through the letter calling.]
Q: (L) I felt that coming and it was so funny! (V) While I was
in this altered state, did I look the same to other people
around me?
A: Yes.
Q: (R) You see it is only a perspective from an individual
perspective.
A: Perception is bonded by awareness. Others are bonded to their
awareness of you and all else.
Q: (V) Well, while this was happening to me, was this also
happening to others in my general area?
A: No. Not likely. You do not yet realize how rare higher
awareness is.
Q: (JN) What triggered it?
A: Frequency envelope thinning due to patterning imprint
repetition of Violette in her environment.
Q: (V) Alright what's a frequency envelope you brainy types. (R)
Actually, frequency envelope, [asking Ark] isn't that what we
were doing with the wave generating computer program? (A)
Frequency envelope is something like that.
A: Your awareness maintains a frequency emanation in concert
with those in your environment. When there are fluctuations in
bonding frequencies both between you and your environment, and
the frequency bonding of another, the fluctuations create
discontinuities.
Q: (R) Okay, that makes sense. (L) It does? (V) Okay then tell
me. (R) Okay. It's like resonance. If the environment has a
particular frequency...hmm... (V) We were asking about the
frequency envelope and what it is. (R) And it's Violette. And
violet is high energy, right? The color spectrum right? [The
group reviews the previous C's answer...] (R) Exactly, so it's a
quantum jump. GROUP: Yeah. (R) Because you're at one level and
unless something strange happens that's where you're at. (L) In
other words--you emanate energy, the other person emanates
energy, and the energy exchange is between you and the
environment, and between you and the person and the environment,
and your environment is maintained, and the envelope of energy
is maintained around you. But if there is...what? Fluctuations?
(R) Ah! "Your awareness maintains a frequency emanation in
concert with those in your environment." Hence, if your
environment has a frequency that allows for a higher frequency,
I mean, it always has the lower, but in some cases it can allow
for higher. (L) They're talking about it being fluctuations in
the environment. If somebody or something in you're environment
is... (A) But the question is--which properties of environment
that we can describe in terms of...(L) Well they're saying that
the fluctuations are in Violette. (R) In concert with the
environment. (L) And in concert with people who are in the
environment. In other words, something is breaking up and you
are no longer frequency bonded to the people in the environment
in the same way; there is a fluctuation there. What is it called
when you add too much energy to something? It becomes unstable.
Your reality construct is unstable. That's what I would say. (R)
You have a bigger marble that you can fit in a bigger hole if
the hole happens to be there. (L) Right.
A: Rejoice! You are growing out of your shoes.
Q: (L) Your feet don't fit anymore! You need new shoes!
A: Basis: shoes.
Q: (V) Okay. Perspective is a word that has been coming up a
lot, so I am going to go ahead and ask about this. We all live
in the same world, but yet we view our environment, what is
going around us differently. One time a few years ago I was with
a psychic counselor, so to speak, a woman named P, and she
insisted that in her world the Rainforest was not being
degraded...
A: STS tend to make such statements because of denial of the
very principle just described.
Q: (V) We were sitting there, and I was whining about how bad
humans treat the earth, (this was when I was studying
Environmental Science), and she was just insisting that, in her
world, the Rainforest was just fine. And you know, I was just
sitting there looking at her, and I just couldn't believe what
she was saying was the truth. And I thought, "okay, is this
woman traveling back and forth between realms or realities or
what is the deal?"
A: She was abnegating any response... ability.
Q: (V) Well you know I stopped going and seeing those psychic
people awhile ago (laughter).
A: Good plan! Hang out your own shingle and let them come to
you!
Q: (V) I don't know about living the life of a psychic. (L) I
think it was a joke. (V) Ah yeah, because I'm thinking "no way
am I doing that!" (R) But the thing is, when that woman said,
"in my world the Rainforest is okay," it means she had already
made a judgment that...(V) Yeah, that she was somehow in a
better place than I was. (L) Well it was also making a judgment
against the wisdom of the universe. It avoids the understanding
that if the Rainforests are dying maybe there is a reason for
it. (R) Exactly. All there is are lessons. (V) Well you know it
was funny because I was taking a Geology course at the time and
we were supposed to go on a diving trip down to South Florida,
and it got stopped by a hurricane. But before that, this
so-called psychic told me she could see me going down there,
following her healing recommendations, and all the dead coral
would come back to life.
A: When the universe is ready to revive dead coral, you can bet
it will revive.
Q: (V) Well I thought that was a pretty tall order for me to be
taking care of it all by myself. To get back to the perspective
thing, personal perception...
A: Frequency envelopes are realms, however they are "in
concert," which implies a degree of scripting at some level.
Some members if the orchestra do not play well. Some do not play
in tune. Some are out of synch. Others expect the one next to
them to play their part.
Q: (R) Which makes even more sense that in 4D STS and STO don't
like to mix because if they do they would play completely out of
synch.
(L) Very bad music.
(V) Is it like my frequency envelope
is my consciousness, the representation of my consciousness?
(R)
No frequency envelopes are realms.
(V) Okay, so I'm a realm unto
myself?
(JN) You are Queen of your realm.
(L) But your realm is
part of an orchestra which means that it emanates a sound - you
are giving off a sound - you are playing your part; and either
you play it well or you do not.
(R) But even if you are playing
it well...
(L) Those around you may not be.
(R) Exactly. So
that's also kind of a reason why 3D is such a low density
because there is so much canceling out. I mean if you put a lot
of 3D guys that are STS oriented in one place and if you put STO
people in another place, physically, then there would not be as
much canceling out. So you wouldn't need as much awareness
individually to make use of higher frequencies because you could
have an orchestra.
(V) Because you would be gathered together
harmoniously.
(L) You can have an orchestra. Okay, quick one: Is
anything going to happen in 2003 like an appearance of the
planet Nibiru or Planet X or anything of any particular
interest?
A: Find out!
Q: (L) They're not going to give us a clue. (R) Can I continue
on the previous subject? So in relation to frequency envelopes
and bonding of awareness to perception, I was wondering if that
related to creating the conduit. The C's have said that you were
creating conduit here? (L) Umhmm. (R) Okay, could it be the case
that frequency resonance of all who are here together with you
is because of the resonance makes it easier, it lowers the
amount of energy needed from the environment to make...
A: The orchestra is able to produce greater volume when in
concert.
Q: (R) Right. So, is this concept - in this sentence that says
"the orchestra is able to produce greater volume when in concert
- is that what is meant by creating a conduit?
A: Close. Frequency envelope has many applications.
Q: (R) Could you outline some of those applications? Is that too
vague? (V) It sounds pretty particular to me. (R) Yeah, but it
has many applications and such a conduit would have such many
applications, one of which I assume we are using now.
A: For but one example: Joshua and the "Walls of Jericho."
Q: (R) Of course. So they used a conduit meaning a resonance of
an orchestra of people to bring down the Walls of Jericho.
A: More or less, though it was not Jericho.
Q: (R) Okay, but the principle applies. (V) Since you are using
this orchestra metaphor what kind of instrument are each of us?
A: Violette wants to be a flute. RO: French Horn. Laura Harp.
BT: Tuba. JN: Piano. MN: Glockenspiel. Ark: Violin.
Q: (V) Thank-you, that was fun. (R) I have a question. If not the
walls of Jericho then the walls of what?
A: Seek Atlantean events for the roots of myths.
Q: (R) Okay, I got you. [Laura sings: Joshua Fought the Battle of
Jericho…] (R) Okay, let's ask about the computer program we have
been working on. [Ark and RO, a Java expert, had spent the
previous week working on creating this program, based on
Schrödinger's equation and Ark's Event Enhanced Quantum Theory.
The program simulates graphically scattering, interference, and
collapse of quantum probability waves.] The graphical artifacts
that we are seeing in the program are they actual or are they
caused by numerical problems or errors in the program?
A: Numerical serendipity is more like it.
Q: (A): What, what? (L) I think "serendipity" is a pleasant
discovery, from a story about the Land of Serendip. (R) Okay so,
is it something that we should investigate or should we focus on
other things?
A: Absolutely. Remember the Benzene Ring. Idea structure was
seen first, then followed explication when application was
realized.
Q: (R) If we can see some application of it then it will be such
that we can back engineer it and figure out the cause of it. Now
we are just looking at it in terms of what is it? What is it
doing? What is it? But if we can see some application... (A)
Well we see one application, a screen saver (laughter). (R) I
think maybe we should find some more interesting application,
but it is a good principle to find an application of it because
that's what can lead us back to what it is. (A) Yeah, that's
true. Well, can you help us with what is the application, give
us some direction?
A: Think of the Benzene "Ring."
Q: (R) Is that only used in chemistry? Or is it used in math as
well? (L) Do you know the story of the Benzene Ring? (R) No. I
only heard about it in chemistry. (M) The story of the Benzene
Ring is the guy that came up with and applied to chemistry,
dreamed of a snake biting its tail and rolling along, and so he
applied that to benzene molecular structure which is double
bonds and a single bond sequence. (R) So that seems to mean that
we are on the right track by trying to see if there is something
there. (L) Maybe the key is the word ring. (A) No you see, what
is mysterious, the fact that things are forming, okay it is
discrete structure, numerical errors, roundings, you know all
kinds of these artifacts. But, the fact that they look like
three dimensional spirals - even if they are created in one
dimension - I have no explanation. I don't even have an idea how
to explain why would they ever create these spirals? Where are
these extra dimensions coming from? I have no idea. (MN) Still,
there is no application unless you can solve it.
A: Ring.
Q: (R) Yes, because its a cycle. It's what was said before. It's
like a loop. (L) Well let me ask this--you've got it moving back
and forth between two barriers right? Can you make the ends
connect? (R) Yes. But then nothing happens because then it just
moves and moves and moves, it is just the initial shape moving
out and coming in another. So nothing happens the only thing...
(M) The wave doesn't change. (R) Exactly. So it only happens
when it has to react with a barrier. (L) Uh huh. (R) That's the
only time it happens because that's what's causing... (B) Could
the barrier represent a density? (R) It could, yeah, actually.
A: Double loop.
Q: (R) Double loop, yeah, exactly. (MN) Double helix? (R) Yeah,
because it's looping...because if you look at the 3D part of it
it's not a spiral, it's a cone. (A) Right. (R) Because it is
spiraling like that, and if you increase the resolution, then it
will be a perfect cone which is moving like that at the same
time it is moving like that. (demonstrates with hand gestures)
And it is moving like that because of balance - because it has
to be from an equal amount [of energy] on either side. (V) It
builds it from itself? (R) Yeah the thing is like this, if you
have a packet of energy going like this and it meets a boundary,
either it can fold up like that - just under its own pressure -
and then spring back. Or, it can utilize the extra dimensions
and coil. Like if you have a string and you just do like that,
it won't be at one point. So I think it's the same thing here.
But how to find out? We need to have some algorithm for the 3rd
dimension for this folding. (A) Umhmm. (V) What if there is
indeed something happening there that you're not seeing? Like we
were talking about at the beginning of the session here: that
you can't know what you can't know because you can't see it
because it's veiled? What are the possibilities that there is
something else happening there to be discovered or uncovered?
(R) And I think that it seems like the only reason it is
manifesting is because the wave is hitting an obstacle. So, the
3rd dimension - it was always there as a possibility - but it
didn't manifest until the wave hit an obstacle. So the obstacle,
in effect, is creating the additional dimension. It was always
there but it didn't manifest until an obstacle was put into the
wave's path.
A: Consciousness energy directors.
Q: (R) Exactly. Because if the wave is hitting an obstacle, if it
just follows mechanics, it's going fold up because that's the
law. But, if you have consciousness interacting with the energy,
then it can say "hey look it is more efficient if you don't fold
up, it is more efficient if you utilize this extra dimension,
because there is then less pressure in the wave if you are using
this extra dimension." But you need that consciousness to kind
of say: "hey look there is this extra dimension that you can
utilize." And it has to say how to utilize it because it has to
choose a direction to start folding into. (B) If our
consciousness defines the parameters of 3rd density, could the
barriers on either side of the wave represent the barriers of
the outside parameters of 3rd density which causes this
continual looping back and forth? And it may be doing something
else in a different density that doesn't have those barriers?
A: Frequency resonance envelope.
Q: (R) Exactly, it makes total sense. So frequency resonance
envelopes are realms. And our program shows that the only time
interesting things happen to a wave is when it hits an obstacle.
And it only manifests the extra dimension if someone helps the
wave to choose which way to start folding out into the extra
dimension. So if densities in effect are frequency resonance
envelopes, which exist as obstacles, that waves of energy can
resonate within...yeah exactly...that makes kind of sense. (JN)
What if the level of consciousness is the barrier? (R) Yeah
exactly. Consciousness energy directors, and the more awareness
you have the more possibilities you can see to direct the
energy. (JN) The less obstruction. (R) Yeah, or you can choose
this... (V) You say you believe something because it's the law,
but... (R) Yeah, because those are the parameters that you see,
but the more awareness you have, the more you see, the more you
can find, then you can know dimensions that you can escape into.
You have the box, you say it's closed, we can't get out of it.
But if you have more awareness, you can say "well there's some
other dimension out of the box that we can use." Do I make
sense?
A: You are going in the right direction...
Q: (R) Which is of course, kind of humorous since they just
talked about consciousness as energy directors and we are going
in the right direction. So we are directing the energy in a
conscious way towards the right frequency resonance envelope.
(L) I'm glad you know what you're talking about. (JN) Now don't
anyone lick that envelope and seal it up! (R) Okay, well this
makes sense. So the basic concept to recap is that densities are
frequency resonance envelopes in the same way that the barriers
in our program are barriers. We have modeled densities on a
computer program. Densities are envelopes. Frequency Resonance
Envelopes. You have energy bouncing back and forth and without
conscious directing of that energy it's not going to utilize
anything more than the paths that are kind of obvious - the
default. But as soon as you start to direct that energy, you can
direct it in such a way that it exceeds the envelope. (J) So
think outside the envelope. (R) Exactly because you are
redefining the envelope. You are finding bigger and bigger
slots.
A: Prime numbers show the door.
Q: (R) It's perfect. So in the simulation, the spirals seem to
always be prime numbers. We have 3, 5, 7, 11, 19 - I think we
have seen at some point. (A) 2 is also prime number (laughter).
(V) But not a 13? (R) I think we have seen 13. It depends on
what parameters you set. I think we can find pretty much any
prime number depending on the values. (A) I don't believe it.
(R) He doesn't believe it. (A) No. It is a hypothesis. (R) Is
the number of apparent spirals always a prime number?
A: Ark is not right on the money.
Q: (A) I am. I will show you! (B) Does that mean he's close? (R)
You can't be close. Either it's prime numbers or it's not. (A)
What did they say that I am not right? Right? (R) Right,
exactly. (A) Okay, I will show you guys. (L) How are you going
to show them? (A) We will do an experiment and we will show that
it's not prime numbers. And the C's will have to recant!
[laughter]. But there are many other ways in which prime number
can come into this game and probably they are coming into this
game and it will be very nice to find this out.
A: Find out, in deed.
Q: (L) Well that's kind of a pun, find out "in deed" - by doing.
(R) We are on a very, very interesting path here because we just
defined what a density is. It's a frequency resonance envelope.
(A) The question is frequency of what?
A: Yes, of those in the orchestra.
Q: (L) So it is by agreement. (A) What is by agreement? (L) To
be in the orchestra, frequency resonance envelope. (B) Not only
to be, but to play within those parameters. (L) Who gets to pick
what gets played?
A: Ah! There's the rub!
Q: (B) That means it's up for grabs. Which is why they're
interested in us grounding a certain frequency resonance so STS
doesn't.
A: No, you don't get to pick the selection at this level. But
you in the future does. The question is: How well do you play,
and can you play true if the others don't?
Q: (M) That's the second time they said that. (R) Yeah, okay, so
in essence, that means what we are doing now is assembling the
orchestra before the concert, and tuning the instruments. (L)
Have you ever sat in the concert hall when they were getting
ready, warming up? (J) It's chaos. (L) It is. (R) But after
awhile it starts getting tuned. But that's what this is all
about - the whole Cassiopaean Communication. Were not playing
yet. We're just tuning. (L) Yeah. (JN) So if our level of
consciousness creates the barriers of where this wave can go and
how it behaves, can we... (R) No, No. No. Excuse me for
interrupting. Our level of consciousness doesn't create the
barriers, it's only aware of those barriers. It can see, okay,
what are the barriers: "oh these are the barriers. I can see,
okay. So here's what I get to play." But if your awareness
grows, then you get to see an array of barriers. "Okay I want to
play with this bigger one. I can play with the smaller ones if I
want to, but I have the awareness to see other barriers that are
more extensive." (L) I think that the concept that we have a
hard time grasping is that - going with the analogy - the
musical selection is made, more or less. We at some level - us
in the future - have chosen what instrument to play, what part
to play. And so, the options that we really have now are: how
well we play, how loud we play, how in tune we play with others;
can we practice, can we stay in tune, can we do any numbers of
these things? And even if we find ourselves sitting next to some
jerk who can't carry a tune, and whose instrument is all screwed
up, can we still continue to play true? Because even though the
rest of the orchestra, being heard from a distance, may sound
quite melodic, because we are sitting next to this guy who can't
play, it is possible for us to be distracted - pulled off track
- and then to distract the guy on the other side of us, leading
to general chaos. (R) It's about focus. (L) Yeah. I'm getting
tired. (A) I have still a question, because all the discussion
around this computer modeling, whether it can be helpful or
should be developed, or can lead to something; and all these
spirals and barriers; they are all about, it's a standard, there
are no events, there are no detectors yet. My idea was that it
is the detectors which make events which make the wave collapse.
Until now, in all our simulations, there is no collapse and no
jumps. And yet we speak about consciousness, while there is this
other concept that it is consciousness that makes the wave
collapse. Okay. So I see a contradiction and I don't know how to
get out of this contradiction. There is no collapse, and yet
there was some encouragement that what we have relates to...
A: The music is on the page long before it is played.
Q: (R) So, when the orchestra starts playing you have the
musical notes, the timing instructions. Right. So it's the same
music. You can play over and over again. But the difference is
how well the orchestra plays and how well it is tuned. Okay, so
one implication can be that...
A: The FRE is the notes on the page. It is the selection. The
"playing" constitutes "events." Frequency resonant envelope: FRE.
Q: (R) So when you're starting out, you have a small orchestra,
you play simple notes. (L) Kinda like 1st density. (R) Exactly.
As you get better at playing you get the bigger orchestra, you
get more instruments, you have to be more careful about having
them in tune because otherwise... (L) And you get more notes.
(R) And you get more notes. But the playing constitutes events.
It's one thing to have an orchestra, it's another to have it
tuned. (L) Alright, let's think about this FRE idea and this
application of it and then take it back to Violette's original
questions about it. FRE is emanated and maintained in concert
with the environment and others... (R) Well, it is also bonded
to the perception through awareness, right? (L) Okay. [V reads
back from the notes] "Your awareness maintains a frequency
emanation in concert with your environment. When there are
fluctuations in bonding of another, the fluctuations create
discontinuities." (R) So a discontinuity would be a quantum
jump, for example, yes or no?
A: Yes.
Q: (R) But this requires that you have an orchestra that is well
tuned. Because if you don't have it well tuned, it's not
resonating so it doesn't matter if the... (V) So the orchestra's
not going to make the music in 4th density. (R) Exactly. So you
have the concert hall, the audience is there, you have the
notes, but the orchestra is not in tune, so you get bad music.
If the orchestra is not in tune, which is why it is important
to...
A: Sing "Goodnight Ladies," Yes?
Q: (L) Anybody have any wrap up questions? (R) Yeah. I have one
completely unrelated. (L) Go ahead. (R) It relates to this girl
I was communicating on the net. I was just wondering if she was
just doing all of that [crazy manipulating] on her own or if she
was just being helped.
A: FRV robot. You will encounter many more in times to come.
Q: (L) FRV Frequency resonance vibration. (R) The question still
is: if she was doing it on her own or if she was being
controlled. (L) Well, FRV robots are being controlled. They can
download an agent into anybody at any time. (V) Let me ask real
quick, what was that man at the grocery store on the 12th of
February that I knew was watching and following me?
A: The warning!!!
Q: (J) What did he do? (B) Yeah, what happened? (V) Somebody was
following me...but why?
A: Remember discontinuities occur when frequencies are no longer
in synch.
Q: (R) So as long as you aren't in synch you cannot stay at the
fixed position. (J) You don't go to the grocery store. (R) No.
You get out of synch with… what?
A: Who shares your reality?
Q: (V) Are you talking about in my home?
A: Yes!
Q: (V) Wait, wait, wait. Is this like what I was talking to
Laura about the movie projector failing and lurching and messing
up the sequence and he was like a mess up in the sequence?
A: Let us just say that the slide got stuck.
Q: (L) Alright let's say goodnight. (Everyone says goodnight and
thank-you)
A: Goodbye.
End of Session
Back to Contents
February 26, 2002
Ark, Laura, RO
Q: Hello.
A: Cassiopaea.
Q: (L) Who do we have with us tonight?
A: Goorpplo.
Q: (L) Where do you transmit through?
A: Cassiopaea.
Q: (L) How often should we have sessions?
A: Regularly is best. Two times per week if needed.
Q: (L) Why did TB call?
A: To probe if possible.
Q: (L) Jay Weidner has written a letter in which he says in
part:
"I was the one who gave Vincent
Bridges 'The Stargate Coinspiracy'. He thought that you were
part of it and he wanted into that group. I realize that
now. He told me once that you were 'in' with Sarfati, who is
very likely a member of the Stargate.
"These are desperate men who have given their souls over to
an entity that they have created with their own lies and
deciet. They think that every channel is a direct line to
the unholy one. [...]
"They think that you are in communication with a spirit that
will give them some kind of advantage in this world. As Set
is the ruler of this world they think that you are in
communication with him. Now they believe that you have
wronged Set in some way and that he is no longer talking to
you. They also believe that this guy "Frank" is possibly the
real channel. They think that you are distancing yourself
from the channel and now they are attempting to destroy you.
Frankly they would have succeeded until I came into the
picture and confused everything.
"He was trying to get into the satanist club. He turned all
of the info on Hendaye into a Satanist working. He thought
you had a beeline to the gold of Satan. Do you understand
what that means? Do you know why he never reveals the secret
of Rennes le Chateau even though he keeps promising to
deliver? It isn't the light masters who live in the south of
France. It is their exact opposite!!!!!!!
"You were leading him, and them, to the place where it is.
But the C's never revealed it. I don't know if they really
knew and didn't say (it seems that way) or if they never
knew it. When VB told me that you had moved to Marseilles I
thought that you were in France searching for the gold. Like
Otto Rahn, before you, you were (unknowingly) leading the
dark masters towards their ultimate goal."
Is Jay Weidner correct that there is
something in the south of France that is very, very evil? Is he
correct in this assessment of the situation?
A: Not really. But those guarding the secrets might be termed as
such. Also they wish to make others think thus. Machiavelli!
Q: (L) Well it works. Is the place of safety at the end of time
to be found in Peru as Jay Weidner thinks?
A: No.
Q: (L) Is the place of safety a physical location on the planet?
A: No.
Q: (L) Is the place of safety a hyperdimensional state of being?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Why does the apparent counterintelligence program seek to
convince so many people that Peru is a source of great wisdom,
benevolence, spirituality and so forth?
A: Same as usual: diffuse knowledge.
[Background to the next
question:
Ark and RO had been working for about a week on
the Quantum Fractals programming and the Wave Generating
program, based on Schrödinger's equation and Ark's Event
Enhanced Quantum Theory. The program simulates graphically
scattering, interference, and collapse of quantum
probability waves. I had just completed chapter 20 of the
Adventures Series.
The following is from an email written at
the time:
We decided to take an afternoon off and take a drive up the
coast to a beach where there had been a sighting of the
black boomerang type UFOs on the same night I did the
hypnosis session with the woman whose husband was a retired
physicist who had worked for JPL on the Mars observer and
pattern recognition for several voyager projects, and had
also worked for years at the underground facility at
Catoctin.
This was the session viewed on video by Tom French
and reported in the Times article. On the same night, the
black boomerang UFOs were also seen in my neighborhood by
persons unknown to me. (we didn't see it at that time.) So,
there we were, up at Bayport, and we stopped at the Bayport
Inn for lunch - RO, Ark, me and two of our girls.
We discussed contrails (which we were observing from the
outdoor wooden deck where we were seated), as well as the
progress of the Adventures series, and plans for same.
As I have been collecting together the "evidence" - or the
chronological reminders from emails and such - for the
events of the past few years, the one thing that stands out
is that a lot of very strange people have been after us for
the primary purpose of obtaining "time travel" information.
This started not long after we had gotten the C's site up
and running. There were emails from "dabbler" types who were
just curious, etc, and we didn't think too much about it.
But then, the guy "Greg," who wrote to us, and who began to
present a major "case" for why we should work with him on
time travel came along. We tracked his visits to an IP in
Langley, VA, and just figured he was a minor spook. I wrote
replies to his emails, and they became part of the website,
on some of the earlier discussion page archives.
Well, no sooner had we dealt with Greg, along came a couple
from "South Africa" with a similar story. The whole set-up
was designed to push all our sympathy buttons and get us to
focus on the time travel issue. As we discussed their issues
with them, (I was really sorry for this woman who claimed to
have lost her two children in an auto accident), certain
glitches in the story popped up and we realized that we were
being "toyed" with - that the story was "bait."
Not long after this, Greg had another go at it under a
different name, though it was the same IP he was posting
from.
Then, along came J** C***, the economist from Ohio State,
who came to visit us, and, during the course of two days
talks, revealed that his agenda was time travel. He also
revealed his connections to Drunvalo... Wright Patterson
AFB, gov. economic programs, and so on.
Meanwhile, we had another guy from Europe who was very
interested in getting us to start doing seminars and
workshops, which we didn't really want to do.
Six days after the economist from Ohio left, Vincent Bridges
started cranking up his operation to get control of the
material, and most especially to gain control of me.
The funny thing is, I wrote to Vincent Bridges and told him
about J** C***'s impending visit and suggested that, since
he wanted to attend a session, he might want to come at the
same time. Well, he claimed all kinds of difficulties, and
couldn't make it. He never mentioned that he knew J** which
later proved to be the case.
Along came Jojo, Terri Burns and Olga. And, guess what?
Going back to their earliest emails, it seems that time
travel was their primary interest.
So, there we are at the Bayport Inn, trying to figure out
what the heck is going on. Why are all these people
interested in Time Travel? Why are they focusing their
attention on us, one way or another? And why does every
interaction with such folks lead to some sort of
"situation," usually of great unpleasantness?
And what's the deal with the Navy connection that kept
popping up in my life from the time I was born?
In the meantime, I had done some searches on the Planet X
stuff and found that there was an early and definite
connection to the so-called "Incan branch." There was just a
whole host of players and activities too numerous to
mention. In the middle of this research, a reader sent me
the following:
"In general, the present cultual epoch, the
5thPost-Atlantean, is the era of the manifestation of the
Consciousness Soul. In this the English-speaking peoples
are, 'in a way', the leaders, since they develop the Consciousness Soul instinctively (a paradoxical concept, if
you think about it). Also, *in a way*, the Central
Europeans, especially the Germans, are leaders, since they
develop the "I", the Ego, which comes to fruition in the
Consciousness Soul.
The next epoch, the 6th, will be a time of Spirit Self
development, though the Spirit Self will not then become
Man's own possession, as is the *I* in the Consciousness Soul
today - that will happen only in the far future, during the
next planetary incarnation, the New Jupiter. In the 6th
Epoch the Spirit Self will be an inspiration from above, as
it were, from the angels. The East-Slavs, especially the
Russians should lead in this development, though in a way
the culture will be world-wide.
The above is of course only a very rough sketch; if taken
too literally, it might cause some misunderstandings.
The excommunicated Russian Anthroposophist Gennady Bondarev
considers the 6th Epoch to be more a "German-Slavic" epoch,
since the right development can happen only if the
Mid-European cultural tasks of social *I*-development come
to fruition and are passed on to the East. [...] It has been
the aim, all too successful, of evil occult-political forces
in the 20th Century to crush the Germans and the East Slavs,
to prevent the right evolution toward the 6th Epoch. If
these evil designs succeed, the 6th Epoch will then be
centered in South America, but will be maimed and distorted,
and the Spirit Self will not descend in the way intended for
progressive evolution. Bondarev does not give a citation of
Steiner for this last point, but I think Prokofieff does, in
his *Spiritual Origins of Eastern Europe...[...]
Prokofieff puts forward the idea that the East Slavs took
on, as a sacrifice, the world-karma of materialism in the
form of the Boshevik oppression, thus enabling Western and
Central Europe to develop to a better degree than would have
been otherwise possible. [...] "
This was rather startling since I had already realized that
the
COINTELPRO activities of the evil secret societies and
the occultists, were designed to vector the New Age
"spirituality" in the direction of South America and its
"spirituality." At the same time that the above was sent to
me, a book came to hand that pretty clearly describes the
pyramidal, chain of command "blood cult" of the Southern
hemisphere as opposed to the symbiotic circle peoples of the
northern hemisphere where joy and dance and direct
interaction with nature as a Star Being was the path. I
realized that there was something very significant here to
look at.
So, two days ago, I was talking about this to RO, and showed
him
the Ica skulls and a comparison between them and some of
the skull images of Egypt, most recently the family of Nefertiti... (Akhenaton had normal skull representations
prior to his marriage to Nefertiti, so it can be assumed
that he was represented in the later art as "deformed" only
by choice and in "solidarity" with her and their children).
This, I believe, demonstrates an obvious link between them
and the Ica skulls, as well as the heads on Easter Island...
Nephilim hybrids, I would say. We speculated as to what
these beings would look like with flesh on their bones, and
a lengthy discussion of Forensic Art followed.
Another thing that we discussed was the apparent fact that
all these secret societies are LOOKING FOR SOMETHING -
rather desperately, in fact.
So, back to our lunch discussion. Why, if they have time
travel capabilities, are they looking for something? Did
they "lose" something?
The next thing we discussed was the issue of why they were
so desperate that they were willing to physically kidnap me
when I was four years old? Sure, all kinds of weird stories
of "abductions" are out there, but apparently that was not
the option here. And apparently, something was so important
that they literally risked exposure by doing this. And why,
considering this desperate kidnapping, have they not simply
put a period to my existence? After all, if we are exposing
the lies and manipulations, it ought to be a simple matter
to stage an accident, or whatever.
So, we came to the idea that the STS forces, lost in their
wishful thinking, had somehow screwed up and lost the
"artifact." Something that is crucial to their plans...
something that they are desperately trying to retrieve...
and maybe something that they are convinced I can "find" for
them, or something along that line... What is more, they
know that "meddling" with the past in certain ways can be
disastrous for themselves.
And that is where the discussion was left when we departed
the restaurant.
As soon as we arrived home, I brought in the mail. There
were three small packages. One was spy software from Nielsen
that they wanted me to install on my computer, offering to
pay me to be a "netratings" participant, etc. No biggie.
The next package was from an archaeology publishing company,
offering me a book on Forensic Art, showing images of how
the face is built up from the skull... also a book on
Forensic DNA, and a book on Bioluminescence... All subjects
of our recent discussions both here at the house. That gave
me a start since the subject of Forensic Art had been so
recent.
The final package was a computer camera - a webcam. No one
in this house ordered a computer camera. It was shipped from
the main offices of our phone company. No invoice, no
explanation - just a camera, software, and instructions for
installation.
Well, Ark joked that they must be after us because of our
expose on Sitchin and the Planet X deal. I laughed and said
"sure!"
So, he did a search on "google groups," putting in only
qcam
and verizon (phone company - to see if they were having some
kind of promotion) and guess what? There was only ONE page
returned and it said:
Planet X: PROBES Sent to Peek?
This was a post made by Nancy Lieder of Zetatalk to
sci.astro.amateur, where she writes:
Per this 1987 statement by
JPL's John Anderson, one function of the Voyager's was
to search for Planet X. (http//www.ex.ac.uk/Mirrors/nineplanets/hypo.html)
In 1987, John Anderson at JPL examined the motions of
the spacecraft Pioneer 10 and Pioneer 11, to see if any
deflection due to unknown gravity forces could be found.
None was found - from this Anderson concluded that a
tenth planet most likely exists! JPL had excluded
observations of Uranus prior to 1910 in their
ephemeredes, while Anderson had confidence in the
earlier observations as well.
Anderson concluded that the
tenth planet must have a highly elliptical orbit,
carrying it far away to be undetectable now but
periodically bringing it close enough to leave its
disturbing signature on the paths of the outer planets.
He suggests a mass of five Earth masses, an orbital
period of about 700-1000 years, and a highly inclined
orbit. Its perturbations on the outer planets won't be
detected again until 2600. Anderson hoped that the two
Voyagers would help to pin down the location of this
planet. ...
Of course, with the webcam and verizon bringing us directly around in a full circle to
several related items, we cracked up. It was just TOO
perfect!
Nevertheless, now with all the connections that have been
made by the research of the group, compiled into the
Timeline, we begin to see that something really big is going
on.
I have some ideas that this program to divert attention
to South America is the major COINTELPRO intent. It's a HUGE
cover-up and diversion. And Vincent Bridges and Jay Weidner
are part of it with their little book "A Monument to the End
of Time."]
Q: (L) Who sent us that camera?
A: ONI.
Q: (L) Office of Naval Intelligence (laughter). (R) For what
purpose?
A: More like a message than anything else.
Q: (L) Like a message? (A) Uh huh. We are watching you guys with
our eye! (L) It is driving me nuts! (R) Should we ask about the
Cable TV truck that was hanging around all over when the camera
arrived? (L) Did the Warner Cable people hanging around have
anything to do with that?
A: Not likely. Just working.
Q: [Laura and Ark have a short discussion concerning the
coincidences they have been noticing in their environment] (L)
Is our assessment of all the many coincidences gathered around
in such a short period of time, that it is a changing of the
program or a bridging of the realities, is that a correct
assessment?
A: Yes, for the better.
Q: (L) We were making some theories about this object that VB
was looking for - the Ark of the Covenant, or the Holy Grail.
[See sessions from March and July of 2000.] I believe that we
understand that this is an object that is of great usefulness,
some kind of lensing device. Is that correct?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Is this something that the STS groups - yeah, we know
everybody on earth is STS, but I mean the heavy duty ones - had
at one time and then lost, or lost control of as we were
speculating earlier?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) How did they lose it?
A: It was not so much "lost" as it was "retrieved" and put away
for safe keeping.
Q: (R & L) Who retrieved it?
A: 4th density STO mission.
Q: (L) Who is it that is looking for it? Is it 3rd density STS
or 4th density?
A: Both.
Q: (L) If it is a 3rd density device why do 4th density critters
want it?
A: It is a trans-density device.
Q: (L) Well if 4th density STS are so technically advanced how
come they can't just make another one?
A: This item is tuned by consciousness. It is of such a
frequency that STS gifts are not capable of such precision. The
range includes multiple possibility vectors. STS operates within
a narrow range.
Q: (R) So they can't make it, but they can use it. So they have
to find one that is already created. (L) Is that possible? (A)
Operated by consciousness? (L)They said tuned not operated.
[discussion of this issue.] First of all we want to ask whether
you mean tuned as in "tuned when it was created" or as "tuned as
in during use?" (A) There is this scenario that they will wait
until the STO guy will find it and tune it, and still only then
they will jump on 'em. (L) Right. Do you mean tuned as in the
tuning of the creation or the tuning of the operation?
A: Creation.
Q: (A) Okay. Once it is tuned, it is tuned, right? (R) Yeah. And
if it was similar to our computer simulation, then tuning is
done by exposing it to similar frequencies. (L) Or maybe
assembling it by virtue of frequencies that are produced. But it
still needs to be established whether or not they can see it. So
we have theorized that the reason they can't find it, the only
reason we can see for why they can't find it, is because for
some reason it is protected by frequency or something and that
they don't know where it is either. Is this correct?
A: Mostly. They have a general idea.
Q: What specifically prevents them from isolating the exact spot
and getting it?
A: Occlusion.
Q: (A) What is occlusion? (R) I think that's similar to...
A: Frequency fence.
Q: (R) Which is similar to what we've been talking about. If you
don't have the same frequency it's... (L) Or they can set a
frequency around it that these guys can't tune to and can't
penetrate. (R) It becomes invisible in some sense. (L) But they
can still in some way detect a region or something. But it can
be like noise or something maybe; so much noise that they can't
isolate the signal. Is this the reason these people keep coming
after us, because they want us to help them find this thing? Is
this the reason?
A: More or less. Though not the only one.
Q: (R) Well I guess another major reason is just to disrupt in
general. So more or less yes, but there are other reasons. Well
Jay Weidner said that they now think that Frank is going to help
them find it, that he is a channel for Set. (A) We don't know if
this is true. What Jay Weidner says about their hopes about
Frank. If that were true, they would already have Frank, they
would be busy with Frank, and they would be leaving us alone.
So, I don't think it is so important. (L) I don't either. It was
just bait tossed out by Jay. (R) I was wondering about the
possible positive uses of the device?
A: Multiple. In ancient times this object was called the Gift of
God. It was used to aid in the manifestation of all things
needful for existence.
Q: (A) Manifestation? (R) That sounds like Merkabah. The
Matriarch Stone. The Mother Stone. (A) So it can do all kinds of
things... (R ) Is this the Merkabah?
A: Mother Stone, yes.
Q: (R) So that's it! This is the real meaning of the Merkabah.
Pretty neat. And there is only one of these available. This puts
a very strange aspect on all this. (L) Where was it created?
A: Kantek.
Q: Was this what was used to help transport the Kantekkians to
Earth at the time of the destruction of their planet?
A: Some of them. Others transported by Lizards.
Q: (L) Well that puts a different slant on that. Alright, we
notice that when we ask details about it - location, etc - the
answers come very slow, details about where it is and all those
things. Let's move on. (R) I want to ask again about this woman,
HR, if she was on auto-pilot and I just happened to be in her
way or if someone actually controlled her? (L) In other words
sent her your way? (R) Yes.
A: H was both real and manufactured. When your frequency was
read, the control program was activated. But be warned that
there are many others, and sometimes there is a delay before the
program is activated. And often the emotions are by then
blinders.
Q: (L) One thing I have noticed is that when you first encounter
a person, there are always very small things that give you clues
that there is a possibility that they can get activated. And if
you're watching for those clues and if you see one or two, then
you put your guard up. If you see three or four then it's just
better to walk away. But that's hard to do. Sometimes they offer
so much fascination. And sometimes we're so needy. We're lonely
or we need a friend, or we need someone to talk to. We need to
share a particular part of our self that is not normally shared
because there is nobody to talk to about it. So many people have
aspects of themselves that they close off and don't share
because they don't have anyone to share it with. So there are
all kinds of reasons we are lured into these friendships. And
yet there are these little signs of danger we are given in the
beginning. And we tend to ignore them because we need or want
something. (A) I would say that one of the good things to
observe is not so much others as our own reaction. I would look
at myself and try to see if I am trying to hide something, to
put something under the rug. Am I trying to suppress some part
of myself; suppress some part to please, or not so much to
please as to not to enrage. (L) Or not to annoy, or not to turn
off. (A) And then when we notice these things about ourselves it
needs silence, meditate on it, then we know it's a valid sign
that is warning us.
Q: (R) What is the relationship between the platonic solids in
our quantum fractal simulations and the fractal patterns? It
seems to relate back to the discussions you had about the
tetrahedrons and the hexagons? (A) Yeah. So that's a funny thing
that I was using, tetrahedrons for this quantum simulation,
before knowing much about it. So question is: what they are they
good for? Maybe they are important or maybe not. (L) Can you
experiment and find out? (A) No because we don't know how to
experiment, what to do with them. For instance these people -
these sacred geometry people or whoever - they think that these
solids - 200 cells or 600 cells - are for some reason important.
Right. They have no idea for what reason. They think they know,
but I have no idea what is the function of this shape.
A: Such polytopes are end products not initiators.
Q: (R) So something else is initiating it and it results in the
polytopes. What do the fractal patterns represent?
A: Events.
Q: (R) Are the detectors that we are using in the EEQT Theory
actual? Should they be included? (A) I have a theory that the
way we are using these detectors is just temporary, and that
they really represent some kind of a moving to a different
density or dimension which we have not yet modeled. (R) So they
are a temporary simplification. (A) Right.
A: It will unfold!
Q: (A) I have a question because when I was asking about quantum
jumps, the answer was, I don't know if I will be able to read
because it is in cipher, it's coded. I cannot decode okay.
Reads: "With respect to ummm... (Ark and Rickard are reading
from a paper) (R) "With room for alterations, the way to quantum
jumps the key to quantum jumps is always in discovering new
mathematics." My first question is about this 'room for
alterations' which sounds very suspicious - like hinting. 'Room'
here is a strange word. I suspect that it has hidden meaning
like for instance Hilbert space. It is my guess that the room
here has a double meaning correct?
A: Di/bi/double.
Q: (L) Di like dipole, bi like a bipole and double, which is
triple meaning. (A) Now this new mathematics was the answer I
was given when I was asking about the p-adic numbers, which
relates to the prime numbers. So I got a book on p-adic numbers.
And I am ready to jump into this new mathematics, but I don't
want jump into the wrong thing, okay? So the question is: what
is this 'new mathematics?' Can it be related to quantum jumps?
A: In this respect you are going to have to put the puzzle
together from many pieces.
Q: (L) So there is no one form of mathematics that's going to
cover everything. (R) We have fractals, we have p-adic numbers,
primes, rings, and groups. Ah! Should we ask if the Benzene Ring
was also related to group and ring algebra, not just algebra, is
that a good question? (A) Yeah, we know that algebra is
important, we know that algebra is the main math, so that if we
ask about algebra the answer would certainly be 'yes,' so it is
not specific enough. (R) Okay. Should we ask whether it is ring
algebra in combination with prime numbers? (A) Yes, certainly
the answer is 'yes' because when we study prime numbers it
automatically comes with the rings. There's no way to avoid it.
(R) I have only one question left on that and that is whether
the detectors are consciousness interface points, is that where
consciousness is interfacing with reality?
A: Frequency awareness boundaries.
Q: (L) What are frequency awareness boundaries made of? Whose
awareness? (R) But it makes sense. (L) Yeah, but whose awareness
is it a boundary of? (R) I guess ours. (A) Who is 'ours'? Whose
awareness? Universal? (R) General, for any awareness I suppose.
A: 7th density nature/divisions.
Q: (A) Okay, so there is this general -what Gurdjieff calls
worlds - he had a very good description. (R) Okay so my question
would be if consciousness, for example us three in this room,
are we interacting with reality through 7th density which uses
these frequency awareness boundaries? Right so it's kind of a
middle step. I'm not sure how to phrase it.
A: 7th density interacts with divisions through you.
Q: (R) Ah! So it is not us interacting with reality through 7th
density it's the other way around. 7th density is interacting
with the concept of divisions through us. (A) That is how it
works. (L) We're it. (R) We are the interface. (R) Of course,
duh! (L) We could've had a V-8Q! (A) When I was looking for the
right keywords for my chapter, I came across this Matti Pitkanen.
And I started to read. And he had all the things that were in my
mind or were mentioned by the C's or that I was asking C's...(L)
So did Dan Winter. (A) Well, Matti is a physicist! (L) So is Dan
Winter according to his own claims! (A) Ouch! So Matti had all
the right things and he knew math; p-adic numbers I learned from
him. Complexification, dimensions, quantum jumps even. Where is
he getting all these right keywords? What is his role? Who makes
him to resonate to all the right things? I don't understand what
such people do, how they come along with all these things.
A: Suffering activates neuro-chemicals which turn on DNA
receptors.
Q: (A) I don't want to suffer if so! And to have my receptors...
(L) We'll have to invent a special suffering just for that. (A)
Okay dear. [laughter (L) Well we must be getting smarter with
all the suffering we did back in July through January with this
Vincent Bridges business. We must've really gotten smart cause
we were really suffering and it culminated in incredible
suffering. But I do not want anymore infections. That was not
the right kind of suffering. But maybe that was evidence of
neuro-chemicals being turned on! When we had our sicknesses in
January I was very, very sick first, for about the same exact
period of time that Ark was very, very sick. We both had massive
infections that were hard to fight. We had to get major
antibiotics. The pain was horrible. What was the cause of these
infections?
A: Laura, Ark: First opening was stress. Second part was
directed wave of negative energy. Third was bacteria activated
by this frequency. End result was response from your system
which did act beneficially.
Q: (R) What is the cause of the headache above my left ear?
A: Psychic stress.
Q: (R) Thank-you. (L) Psychic stress? (A )Yeah, environment. (R
) It is the same thing the doctor said.
End of Session
Back to Contents
March 30, 2002
Ark, Laura, BT, VG
Q: (L) Hello.
A: Pleased to see you.
Q: (L) And who do we have with us this evening?
A: Kolonia.
Q: (L) And where do you transmit through?
A: Cassiopaea
Q: (L) Alright, do any of us have any questions we were planning
on asking? VG has her questions. (V) I'll start with the Reiki
symbol that we received once at a previous session. (shows
symbol drawn on a piece of paper) This was the way it was drawn
out and at the time it was drawn, we were told that it was close
enough as though maybe it wasn't exactly as it was supposed to
be. I am wondering if this is closer than this? (comparing
proposed alternatives) In other words if the spiraling inside of
the...
A: Match corners to outside spiral, neither inside nor outside.
Q: (V) Okay, I think I understand now. The other question I have
about this symbol that I thought was very curious is in this
center part there is an L, is there any significance to
that?...well, I'm sure there is significance...
A: Crook shape signifies movement into higher dimension.
Q: (V) Next question: Is repeating the names of the symbols,
which I guess is like a mantra which is a no-no here, as
effective as repeated use of the symbol? Does it go either way?
A: No. Important part is the geometry.
Q: (V) So the use of the symbol is putting a geometric equation
into the person's body...
A: Think of it as soldering in a new circuit.
Q: (V) New circuit as in DNA?
A: More like transducer of higher consciousness. If DNA changes
result, it depends on the application.
Q: (V) Alright. Now then, this other Reiki symbol you gave us -
An-nu-ki (shows symbol). I was wondering if Laura had drawn it
correctly as it had been drawn before since she was doing it
from her...
A: Close.
Q: (L) I've got it, let me show you. (V) What could make it
closer?
A: Close base.
Q: (V) Ahh! Okay. And what does An-nu-ki mean?
A: Already described. Retention of energy.
Q: (V) The next question - and I asked Laura about this - is it
possible, in a meaningful way, to send healing energy, Reiki,
directly to the subconscious through the ether tube connector
symbol?
A: Yes. This has also been discussed. Application increases
circuit imprint.
Q: (L) I think the way the question was asked before - does
repeated applications of Reiki heal Karma even, and the answer
was 'yes'. I think that something that heals Karma just about
covers everything...since that is very often our major concern
in this reality. (V) Laura and I were looking at these Karuna
Reiki symbols earlier and discussing them, can you offer some
insight as to their validity?
A: Give them a try and research background of originator. You
may discover something very interesting.
Q: (V) Well, I have used them, not to a great extent. The one
that I have used the most is the Rama symbol which is used to
dispel or expel negative energy. Does this symbol do what they
claim it does?
A: Do you think that a symbol can control your consciousness, or
the consciousness of another?
Q: (V) I guess I've been thinking it's a tool just as this is a
tool (holds up symbol displayed earlier). No I don't think a
symbol can control consciousness...when it's put that way. But I
want to say that I think they can be used as tools also. Not to
be right or anything but this my thinking at this time.
A: What quality of an individual would have to be present to set
the effect of a symbol against consciousness?
Q: (V) I don't understand that. (L) I think they are saying that
the presence of a negative energy implies the presence of a
negative consciousness. It's either the consciousness of the
individual who is experiencing it or it is the consciousness
being projected from somebody else. And if one or the other of
those is the condition - say for example: if you had negative
energy that was being sent to you from someone else, and you
wanted to set this symbol against that negative energy, what
quality would have to be present in you in order to make that
work? (V) A lack of negativity. (L) I don't think so. You
already have negativity right? So you're going to use the symbol
to make it go away assuming it was sent on you. So what do you
have to have to make the symbol work? (V) A conscious effort?
(L) Faith. You have to believe in the symbol. And if you believe
in the symbol then you are putting the power in something
outside of you, you don't believe that you have the ability to
stand against the negative consciousness. On the other hand, if
the consciousness of negativity is your own, and you believe a
symbol can stand against your own negativity, you haven't
inquired into where the negativity comes from. (A) You see a
tool is something which you must know exactly how it operates,
because otherwise it's not a tool; you are the tool of something
else - the originator of the tool who may not have your best
interests at heart. So you must exactly know, and have precise
knowledge of, the tool if it is to be a tool. So a tool is a
projection - an extension - of what is in you.
A: Otherwise you are the tool of the tool
Q: [laughter]. (L) You are the tool of the tool if you don't
have real understanding of what it is and what it is supposed to
do. (A) Okay, so if it looks like a nice bomb... (L) Push the
button. Don't know what the bomb does, but let me push the
button anyway and see what happens! (V) Well, okay. (L) I know,
ain't it fun? (V) Well it's stuff I want to ask, and then I have
to think about it for awhile. I want to ask about the picture
with Easter [V**'s cat who at the time the photo in question was
made, was passing on of old age. V** had placed the symbol for
Ohm over Easter's head to aid in the transition and directly
following the application a Polaroid picture was taken revealing
a point of light above V's head]. Was the point of light over my
head a fault of the print or of the camera?
A: No. It was the light of consciousness of the companion soul.
Given to you as thanks.
Q: [There was further discussion between Laura and Violette with
regard to the Karuna Reiki system of healing that led to the
following question] (V) From what density do the symbols come
from? Are they STS or STO?
A: 3rd money growing density.
Q: (V) So it wasn't even channeled?
A: Most of the symbols can be found in other literature in whole
or in part.
Q: (V) I was thinking of a question and I just lost it. Do you
know the question I was thinking of? I'm sorry.
A: Do you?
Q: [Laughter] (V) Yeah I do, but it's eluded me for the moment.
Dang, alright if it's gone, its gone. Hmmm, 3rd money growing
density...what people will say or do, it just amazes me, blows
me away. (L) It gets so bad. The more layers you peel away the
worse it gets. it's like you just want to run screaming "I want
out of this place." (V) I'm going to be brave here and ask if
it's possible to get a symbol this evening that may work on
viruses? (L) Viruses? (V) I know ...okay I'm back to the same
question of consciousness.
A: Viruses make inroads only when there exists gaps in
consciousness. A full field of awareness closes the gaps. Heal
the soul by means of increased knowledge which leads to DNA
modification which closes gaps...To do it otherwise amounts to
self violation of lesson profiles elected by the self.
Q: (A) What about the healers? All these healers they go around
the world and they heal. Most of the time, their effects are
temporary. Will they heal only those people who come and ask?
And usually when they come and ask, they are asking in a
specific way for them to be healed. I mean I don't know what is
so specific but, the question is, of course, they don't close
the consciousness gap. Or do they? How do they heal? I mean,
they can kill even viruses some way. How do they do that?
A: If the healing is true, it occurs at multiple levels. It is
an interaction of prior choice potential.
Q: (V) So it is going to work because it is time, or it is your
destiny. I guess. (B) If it works, it must mean that the
individual has chosen to allow it to work at that particular
time, and the healer is more of a facilitator of the personal
choice - at a higher level - of an individual.
A: Yes.
Q: (A) A kind of transaction between the two. (L) It's like the
switch, it was ready to happen, and the "healing activity" just
flipped the switch. It was ready (B) Healing comes from inside.
Whether it is psychic or physical, we may rely on other
triggers. (L) Yeah we may use all kinds of symbols in our world
the way we use words to convey our ideas. We can use
interactions between human beings to convey our readiness and
willingness to move into a new way of being. (A) The healers
maybe don't know what they do, it's just the right thing, they're
there at the moment, they are there, the person is there. (V) As
long as they are not doing it from their ego. (L) Right. I think
it is as much a matter of "here is a person who needs it" and
"there's the person who instinctively knows what to do and how
to do it and they do because they can do it." They're the person
of the moment - the "man of the hour" - and it is there in front
of them. It's like walking down the street and there's a piece
of paper: do you walk by it or pick it up? (A) But there may be
something more. I'm thinking about this Bulgarian guy D**. He
apparently has some psychic abilities and he went into research.
So now he was telling me about these bad guys who are using this
ability for mind control and such things. But he wrote one thing
that was kind of unexpected from him. Maybe he read it from our
pages, but probably not. He said that even those people cannot
do anything unless the given person is willing to be controlled.
(L) But that is true only at a deep level. It's pretty clear
that STS can violate the free will of those who are ignorant of
their existence and abilities. So D** is just repeating New Age
nonsense. That's what the folks doing mind control experiments
would like us all to think. Yes, it is true that the person
must, of their own free will, choose. A person who has chosen,
at a very deep level, to seek truth, to ultimately receive
positive energy, will be motivated by negative experiences to
increase their knowledge, which then increases their awareness,
which then increases their abilities of STO to communicate with
and interact with other similar people. People use their free
will - at very deep levels - to choose to be duped and
manipulated. This is either because STS is their ultimate choice
and destination, or it is because they need to learn the lesson
about growing their awareness. When they choose to refuse to
seek knowledge they have already chosen. When they choose belief
over seeking and being open they have already chosen.
A: In all cases freewill is paramount even if it is not apparent
at this level.
Q: (L) My son read the last session notes and he wants to ask
what kind of instrument he is?
A: Base Viol.
Q: (J) Bass Viola or Violin? (L) Bass Viol. (J) Are you guys
being like arbitrary about this? I mean is it just like picking
randomly, like random number theory or something? (L) Must be.
(J) Okay I'm a bass. I am a bassist I like that. Thank-you guys.
(B) Well I've got to have someone to counter rhythm my tuba. (L)
What is A**y?
A: French Horn.
Q: (L) What is A**?
A: Piccolo.
Q: (B) Somebody else was a French Horn too. (L) R** was a French
horn too. Two French Horns, huh? We have to find somebody whose
a Bassoon. (J) I have somebody who's a buffoon. (B) Bassoon, not
buffoon. (J) I know somebody who plays all the Bassoons. (L)
Alright. I want to know about this incident of a week ago about
the dead cat. I went out to water my tree, and when I turned
around to come back in the house something caught my eye and
there was a dead cat laying there right on the edge of the
flower bed right by our bedroom window. It was just stiff so it
couldn't have been dead more than 5 or 6 hours and since it was
almost noon it must've just died at daybreak. It was a big cat.
Didn't look like anything was wrong with it. He didn't look
messed up in any way. He looked like he just walked there and
laid down and died. And of course he looked a lot like Miko (the
family cat). And then I thought my God we've got to do something
quick before A__ comes out here because she would just have a
fit. She would be so upset it would just be terrible. So we
called the city and they came and got it. It was real upsetting.
Where did the dead cat come from?
A: It came to die where the energy could best aid advancement.
Q: (L) So it wasn't some weird person doing it was it? Like
somebody trying to send voodoo on us?
A: No.
Q: (L) What did the cat die from?
A: Parasites.
Q: (L) (A) So what about the energy? He came here because what?
(V) The energy could best aide advancement. Any more questions
about the cat? (L) Well no, that takes care of the cat. (V) It's
kind of... (L) Creepy, under the circumstances. What with VB and
the gang out there doing the hoodoo dance with their magickal
mumbo jumbo. (V) But that the animal recognized this as a place
to go and advance is interesting... Pet Semetary [laughter]. (B)
That's why I'm hanging out so much, just in case! [even more
laughter].
[Break]
Q: (V) This question maybe has been asked in other sessions
where I wasn't here, so forgive me if that's the case. What is
the difference between creative visualization and imagination?
A: Not much.
Q: (V) Okay. I was going through some of the transcripts and
reading, and I found the statement in there that said
"consciousness is the half-life of energy" and I thought this
was just so interesting. Let me ask this: is that half-life,
because with chemistry and chemicals they know exactly what the
half-life is of certain, say uranium, that it has so many years
until it changes into what ever it changes into...(L) But it is
statistical. (V) Statistical. Okay. What is the time span or
frame of reference where its energy degenerates, morphs,
whatever the word is, into consciousness?
A: You are assuming that physical understanding applies. In this
case the better question would be: What is energy?
Q: (L) What is energy? [asking Ark] (A) Don't know. (L) What do
you mean, "don't know?" (A) Nobody knows. (L) Oh! I see what
they're saying. Energy can't be compared to a physical process
such as the half-life of an atomic element or something. (V)
Alright, and also maybe this is my assumption as I am relating
energy to thought processes.
A: How do you know that "thinking" is energy?
Q: (V) Well, I don't think that I know that it is, I'm just
postulating and thinking about it.
A: How about "utilization?"
Q: (V) Okay, what is energy? I know the atom and the nucleus,
and I basically understand the physics of energy, but is that
what you're talking about?
A: Take an example: Light is an energy expression of gravity.
Utilization of gravity "generates" light.
Q: (A) The point is that we can't define concepts. We can show
simply how they work in certain, how you say...(B) Framework.
(A) Okay: framework, by relating them to other concepts and by
pointing out that this is the correct use of this word and this
is the incorrect use of this word. And this is not mathematics.
In mathematics everything is defined in terms of primitive
concepts. Here, we don't know what are the primitive concepts.
So we say" now here is light and it's an expression of energy.
Now what is so particular about light? You can think about what
you learn from physics. From physics you know that light has no
mass, it is pure quantum of energy. What it means, we really
don't know. We know that when light is absorbed, it has a
physical effect, but in the meantime where does it go? It is not
mass. It's something that can hit you like energy; but not a
piece of a solid something; it is pure energy. And then we know
something from the Theory of Relativity, that when light travels
a distance from one point to another point in the 4th
dimensional Einstein space, the distance measured in this 4th
dimension is zero. If you sit on a ray of light you are
instantaneously everywhere. Time does not flow for light which
travels. That's energy. For a mass, time flows. Mass understands
what is time. For light everything is instantaneous. So we learn
a little bit of what energy is even if we can't seem to define
it, right?
A: And, as you already guess, consciousness "precedes" light as
an energy expression. So the question is: How do your
quantifications apply?
Q: (A) I have a test question for Cassiopaeans. Which is true of
the following two possibilities: a) In certain circumstances
energy can create consciousness. b) In certain circumstances
consciousness can create energy.
A: B: consciousness can create energy.
Q: (V) And isn't light also information?
A: Light is utilization.
Q: (V) Okay, light is utilization. How is that done? Is this a
process? Maybe I would understand it better if it said "the
utilization of light."
A: What would you utilize light for?
Q: (V) Well, to raise consciousness. To raise awareness.
A: How would light raise consciousness?
Q: (V) If light is energy, I mean, if light is information...(A)
Light is not information. It's not what you learn in physics.
You can use light to send information. (V) Why does it have to
be about physics? (L) What else can it be about? Physics is
concerned with the most fundamental questions of reality. (A)
What is light? What do you know about light? What is light for
you may be another definition of light. (L) This is what they've
said before: They've said that light is produced by utilization
of knowledge. That light is an energy expression of gravity.
They've also said that light is an expression of the utilization
of knowledge. So we come to the idea that knowledge is gravity
in a certain sense. In other words knowledge consists of all
things that could or could not be in all contexts, in all
realms, in all dimensions, in all universes, that the sum total
of everything is like this non-existent, non-dimensional point
of everything that could ever exist. It's almost like this zero
point from which all potential could erupt given the proper
circumstances. We're getting into something where there's not
many words to describe it. There's a huge limitation here that
if you don't know math, your words can only take you so far
because as precise as you can get with your words, you can't get
as precise as you can get with numbers. Numbers say things that
words cannot, and they say it in a way that communicates
directly to some part of the mind that bypasses this word
processing organ. Well I don't want to say bypasses, I mean it
goes to a place that's higher than a word processing organ, so
to speak. Another interesting thing is all the knowledge that we
can gather is like gravity, and collecting gravity is like
becoming heavier. But then when you utilize it, you share it and
there is a burst of light and this is the utilization. In other
words utilizing your knowledge is doing something with it. And
that goes back to that thing that Gurdjieff said that for those
in the higher esoteric circles, at that inner level their
understanding is immediately expressed as action. Understanding
and action are like two sides of the same coin. And then of
course there's other levels where they have understanding but
they have no action. We've all seen that in the gurus who sit
around and contemplate their navels saying they understand
everything but they're not doing anything. They just sit there
contemplating their navel. Until one can do and act based on
their understanding it is not utilized and they then have not
produced light unto the world. A simple example is - We can sit
here and collect 700 pages of gravity of information, or
knowledge and until we utilize it, until we do something with
it, until we share it, it's not light... we've just collected it
and it's gravity. But the minute we start writing it, the minute
we start processing it through us into our reality in some way,
we write web pages or we do some activity or we do as the C's
say, "You will do what you will do" and that's entirely a
function of your understanding. (V) Of light as utilization. (A)
Light when it stops it becomes matter. Maybe it is so that, at
another level, when consciousness hits something, it becomes
light. (V) What is it hitting? (A) For instance a consciousness
is hitting another consciousness. So, there is a reaction. And
as a result of this reaction, light is created which carries
somehow the information, the knowledge of the interaction. (L)
So we end up almost coming around in a circle. (V) So what
you're saying then is light is not the first. (A) No we know
already that consciousness creates light. We've got this answer,
consciousness is more primitive. There are these levels of
matter/reality I would say, okay? (V) Okay. I had it backwards
in my head. I thought light was more primitive than
consciousness. (A) Light is very close to matter, you stop light
and you get matter. (L) Matter is nothing but congealed light.
Another thing: light is an energy expression of gravity. It's an
energy expression. That suggests that gravity is energy
unexpressed. And when it expresses it's light. And when it
expresses here and then it expresses there we have these units
of consciousness which are unexpressed energy prior to light.
When gravity is expressed it is consciousness - perhaps
manifesting as some other range of the EM spectrum - and then
the next level of the expression is when one consciousness
energy and another consciousness energy interacts with each
other and then light is produced. Possibly. (A) Another
possibility is that consciousness is the organizing principle.
Light is something that is already organized. (L) What if
consciousness is an unstable gravity wave. (A) We don't know
what that is. We don't even know what are gravity waves. (L) The
bottom line is, we're probing into realms that have been probed
and probed and probed for ages with no definitive results. (A)
Oh, we'll find out. (B) The sad thing about it is this whole
process is cluttered with so much misdirection and semantics.
(L) Yeah, and the battle factor.
[The next question I asked requires some background information.
Earlier in the month, Frank had published, via Vincent Bridges,
the following declaration:
Notice from "Frank G. Scott":
Clarification of Copyright Notice
Frank G. Scott does hereby assert his right, morally and
legally, to be considered as an author of the material, herein
referred to as the Cassiopaean Transcripts: 1994 –2000,
consisting of transcripts of channeling sessions conducted
jointly and solely by Frank G. Scott and Laura Knight Martin,
also known as Laura Knight Jadcyzk.
Ms. Knight Jadcyzk has consistently demonstrated bad faith in
the matter of Mr. Scott's copyright to the material - claiming
sole copyright to admittedly collaborative material, then using
that material for the purpose of individual financial gain, as
well as basing a cult around the material - without ever seeking
or receiving permission of any kind from Mr. Scott for any of
these uses.
Therefore, as of March 1st, 2002, the following copyright notice
and stipulation of permission shall be considered the sole legal
and valid copyright statement concerning the material referred
to herein as the Cassiopaean Transcripts: 1994 –2000:
The ___ Cassiopaea Logs: 1994 –2000
© _____ and Laura Knight Jadcyzk 1994 –2000
(By granting Ms. Knight Jadcyzk co-author status, Mr. "Scott,"
in light of Ms. Knight Jadcyzk's previous bad faith attempts to
use the material without permission, makes the following
stipulations:
1) No commercial use of the material whatsoever.
2) The material is to be made freely available in its unedited
form, and may be transmitted or used only in that form. 3) No permission is granted or implied for any use of excerpts,
beyond the length and for the reasons outlined in the fair use
provision of the DMCA, or individual sessions by any person,
organization or corporation whatsoever.
(Any further use, after March 1st, 2002, of any material
copyrighted as noted above without the express written
permission of both authors, or that violates the permission
stated in the above copyright notice, will be considered an act
of copyright infringement, which, if proven, carries penalties
of $20,000 to $100,00 per infraction.
(Please be advised that this warning is an official notice to
cease and desist all copyright infringements and any other use
of the material which does not have the express written
permission of both authors, or which violates the permission
granted in the copyright statement.).
As a result of this completely psychopathically outrageous and
illegal attempt to destroy our life's work - the Cassiopaean
work - we were spending some considerable time and money on
attorneys. It was pretty clear that the above notice had been
composed by someone other than Frank, and it was my guess that
it was a collaboration of Vincent Bridges and Teresa Burns - who
claimed to teach "copyright law."
Our rights were well
established legally, but the attorneys let us know that the only
way to stop this piracy - a civil matter - was to have a court
declare that the law had, indeed, been violated. After that,
there were severe penalities, up to and including imprisonment.
The problem was, taking such a matter to court meant Federal
Court. That was extremely costly.
The readers of the Cassiopaea
site came through for us, though, and in in just a couple of
weeks we had sufficient funds to file suit. There was, however,
one thing that preyed on my mind: Frank's elderly mother. I knew
that Vincent Bridges had put Frank up to this nonsense, and that
Frank was following the carrot on the stick just like a dumb
ass.
But he was doing it on his mother's income. It was her
money that was paying for his attorney who responded to our
cease and desist demand. It was her money that would be used to
fund a defense if and when we filed. And file we were certainly
going to do. And I already knew what Frank's larcenous behavior
had done to his father when he was manipulated to pay many
thousands of dollars back to cover the embezzlement Frank had
committed in his previous employment.
I didn't want to be
responsible for the same type of situation regarding his
mother.]
Q: (L) Speaking of battles: I want to know just really what is
in Frank's mind, what are his motives? (V) What does he have to
gain from all of this?
A: He is a tool of 4d STS. He has chosen.
Q: (V) He has chosen? Okay, if somebody goes to the store and
they choose to get rye bread instead of white bread, he chose it
like that? Or did he choose it like... A: He came to this incarnation with a plan remembered as he
awoke. Q: (L) It was already a pre-made choice? (B) The choice was made
on a different level and he's just now making that choice
manifest? (V) Is this Karmic? A: Choice. Some love light, and some love darkness.
Q: (L) When did he wake up and have this realization? Was he
lying and deceiving all of us, all along from the beginning?
A: He was half awake. But like many he was confused.
Q: (L) Confused in what way? A: He did not fully understand the symbols of your world.
Q: (L) So at what point did he finally understand that he was
different from us and we would never be on the same track?
A: He was awake as early as late 1998 or early 1999.
Q: (V) Did Ark's arrival spur on this awakening?
A: Partly. Q: (V) I'm also curious, since we're talking about what he is
thinking, does he have regrets? Is he regretting what's
happened, what's come about? A: He is only capable of regretting that he did not get what he
wanted. Q: (V) Okay, so he is a tool of 4th density STS...what is the
payoff for Frank, what does he think the payoff is? A:
He is lost in the illusion of his own importance. He believes
that others agree with his assessment. Q: (V) You know, that doesn't seem like a real worthwhile payoff
to me. I guess that's what separates the wheat from chaff. For
self-aggrandizement - getting what you want - to be more
important than growing and learning. It seems like a cheap
payoff.
(A) Is it not so that 90% of the population thinks that
way?
(V) I know but I don't get it; it's so shallow.
(L) I know
we don't get it and we can't.
(A) What he thinks is probably:
"these stupid people they think they grow, they have their
illusions they think of Oz, instead of going after something
real like money or being famous. They want to learn. They think
there is nothing like truth, all is light. The better your light
the higher you would go. They don't understand it, they will
fail." That is what he thinks: that we are failures. And he
thinks "I was also following this path of failures and I almost
failed myself. It is good that I disassociated with them."
(L)
Yeah. Sad to say, that's probably what he is thinking.
(V) Its
sad, and I don't mean sad like "oh poor Frank," I mean it's
pathetic!
(L) Yeah because they always think - in a certain
sense it's funny - they think they are going to unify the world
and go back into this cosmic sleep. They've got to control
everything, absorb everything back into this cosmic sleep...
(V)
Why do they want to do that?
(L) Because they're afraid of
creation. Creation is uncertain. Creation is free. Creation is
not secure. It implies being open; it implies being fearless.
(V) Do they actually think these things between their left and
right brain?
(L) No they are probably not aware of it. They
rationalize it with high sounding ideas and ideals. They call it
Christianity or they call it the Ophanic calls to the
Watchtowers or whatever. Or they say that they are going to
meditate on peace and save the world or something. They mask it
with all kinds of illusions and beliefs, and the masks are
several levels deep. It's as hard for us, I think, to understand
their point of view as it is for them to understand ours. They
think we are fools, I'm sure. Well sometimes I'm not sure of
that.
(V) I'm having a hard time conceiving that they're sitting
in their little coven group or whatever the heck it is, and
saying, "'Look how stupid they are, look how ignorant they are,
they are fools." If they are really doing that, then that's
projection. They are projecting what is true only about
themselves.
(L) Right. And they are doing that. You should read
some of the public postings that they have made talking about
us. It is such filth. Actually, in an interesting way, this is
what clued us in to the whole STS mindset. Because, when we
tossed VB out of the group because we found out he was lying and
manipulating, we actually set up a little test. We gave him a
choice. We let him know why we had to make the decision about
his conference, and we told him what it was that he was doing
was not acceptable to our work. We could not appear at his
conference, we could not have him publishing our books, we could
not have him as some kind of a guru in our group if he was going
to continue with all of this magical stuff - promoting things
that were anti-thetical to what the C's were explicating.
(V)
What kind of ritual magic was he into?
(L) Golden Dawn satanic
rituals among others. And he had a whole website teaching people
how to do them and he wanted to come into our group and teach
our group how to do these satanic rituals. I had sent him all
the information about what the C's had said about rituals and he
kept trying to twist it and interpret it so that it would be
okay and he just wasn't getting it. And the thing was, at that
particular point in time there was just a whole bunch of weird
stuff going on and we just let him know that we can't be
associated with this. He had a choice.
(V) Putting the C's
aside, it goes against everything that you believe in
personally.
(L) Everything we have worked for out entire lives.
He was setting us up to get taken down the tubes. Oh but
according to Vincent, the real problem was me. According to him,
I just didn't understand the C's, the C's were really teaching
me how to do these rituals, only I was incapable of grokking it.
(V) Oh BS!
(L) But this is what he was saying to me. I didn't
really understand how to interpret the C's and if I allowed him
to be my teacher then I would understand what the C's were
really saying!
(V) And if you were stupid, ignorant, and a fool
you would've believed him.
(L) So you see, we explained it all
to the group, which included him. And he had a choice at that
moment - how bad did he want to publish our books, how bad did
he want to be associated with us, how bad did he want any of
those things? Did he want it bad enough to fully align himself
with the C's work? No. He was going to have it his way or not at
all.
(V) A narcissist.
(B) I think there is a huge, huge
tendency to overlook the fact that both VB and you, for example
so to speak, are necessary in the scheme of creation, that both
are equal, it's not a matter of one being right or one being
wrong it's a matter of which one do you choose, period.
(L)
Right.
(B) Creation can't be just inhales, there has to be
exhales.
(L) Right. But he had the choice to be a part of what
we were doing - he worked for a long time to do that - and then
he just shot himself in the foot as far as we were concerned.
The question was, though it was unspoken and had to be an
understanding that would come from within him: are you with us
or against us?
(B) On a different level there may be completely
different choices that have to be made, but at this level that
seems to be the choice period.
(V) Are there other realms where
these people such as VB, Frank are making different choices?
(L)
In other words is there another reality where they're being the
good guys, where they're joining in and helping.
(V) Right. An
alternate reality. A: Frank and Vincent are the other reality!
Q: (V) Wow! Everything happens all at once, huh? They are the
other reality in like the antithesis of Laura's work? A:
More or less, yes. Q: (L) Is this conflict, so to speak, that we are engaging in
with this Frank/Vincent Bridges situation - is this one reality
that is also represented in another reality as this conflict
between say the Jews and Arabs at the present moment? A:
Very close, it is reflected in many ways at present.
Q: (L) Well I just want you to know our side isn't doing too
well. (V) Why do you say that? (L) Well I mean if these
conflicts are reflected in many levels and many ways all over
the planet just the general overview of the planet at the
moment, the so-called good guys aren't really doing too well
right now. (B) Yeah, this reality is their own truth. (V) I see
it a different way, I think we are in this situation because we
are not of this reality; we have made a different choice. (L)
But there are so few of us. A: Help is on the way.
Q: (V) What no exclamation point! [laughter] Okay so we get a
period tonight. And then in one month we get one exclamation
point. Next month we get two, three, and then we know it's
really close. I'm such a quantifier. [laughing] Wishful thinking
huh? (B) If this is the given status of this environment and
this density level, this lesson, anybody that breaks free from
that is a plus, because there is undoubtedly a counterbalancing
thing. (V) Right. Take your kudos where you can get them.
A: And it will balance in the end. Q: (L) Well that will be nice. (V) Is this balance necessary for
our transition to 4th density? A: Balance is the result.
Q: (V) Balance is the result of transitioning to 4th density, is
that what you're saying? A: Yes. Q:
(V) If 90% is negative and 10% is positive... A: But all will not transition.
Q: (V) Balance would mean 50-50...
(B) No because we're not the
only ball game in creation. This is not the sum total of
creation. This reality is only one aspect of it. There can be
other realities where it's as heavily weighted the other
direction.
(L) I think another factor is that when people
network they share their insights and they share their growth
and it becomes more than the sum of its parts. You know when
they really open up to their network, that what one learns - if
they share it with others - it becomes that other's learning in
at least some sort of way. This way, people can learn a lot of
things by the experiences of their group if they are connected
to that group. So, a group of people who are individually each
incapable of making it to 4th density on their own - by virtue
of the fact that they have this shared symbiotic group - they
kind of go together. On the other hand, the STS alignment, since
they don't do anything in terms of groups or sharing, don't have
that advantage. It takes more energy for each one to
individually advance since, in their chain of command, they are
all being constantly drained by sharing and believing lies. So,
the advantage seems to be on the side of an STO group even if
they seem to be smaller in numbers. The added together energy of
a larger group of people who are individually, maybe less ready
STO-wise, will graduate anyway, as opposed to the very small
group of those who are ready STS-wise. Most of the STS gang will
have to just go back and do 3D over again.
(A) You must
understand that the very concept of balance depends on what
exactly has to be balanced. When you have a scale, and you have
a lot of wheat or something on one side, and a small piece of
gold on the other, they balance each other even if the
quantities are completely different.
(V) Maybe STO candidates
carry a larger...
(L) Charge?
(V) Yeah. (L) Something like that,
because they share very deeply - at the level of their core
being.
(V) So there could be 90% of STS and at 10% STO
candidates as they gain knowledge gain more weight.
(L) Could
be. A: Very close. But don't get stuck on numbers in that sense.
Help is on the way! Q: (L) An exclamation! They got a lot closer pretty fast! (V)
For what? A: All of you. Q: (B) Is it a very generic form of help as opposed to a
specific individual form of help? A: Wait and see!
Q: (L) I do want to ask about BT's health. What does B** need to
do or not do to stop this cramping in his legs/ A: Stop being static. Lactic acid granules.
Q: (V) Stand on your head. (B) Oh sure then they'll go to my
head and that's the only thing that's functioning properly.
[laughing] (L) So when you walk it breaks them loose and it
causes you pain. (B) Can I take ____ to help with the lactic
acid assimilation. A: No. Q: (L) Well unless there is something you need to tell us that
we haven't asked we'll say goodnight. It has been a very
enlightening little session here. A: Elev. Q:
(L) Why are they being so coy?...Is that all that there is?
A: Yes. Goodbye.
End of Session
Back to Contents
April 25, 2002
The background to this short session is the
following:
Numerous letters had been exchanged
between our attorney and "Frank Scott's" attorney. I could see
what must have been the manipulations of Vincent Bridges and
Teresa Burns behind Frank's claims and demands which were
preposterous. I realized that he did NOT understand the danger
he was in and there must be others behind him, egging him on to
his own destruction.
This appalled me because I still had
sympathetic feelings for Frank and I was angry to see him being
so shamelessly used. What was worse, I realized that whoever was
using him was also using him to take advantage of his mother
just as he had taken advantage of his father in his previous
embezzling escapade. I knew Frank's mother was in a precarious
state regarding her health and that concerned me even if it
obviously had not occurred to Frank. He was only interested in
keeping things from her so he could continue to manipulate her
to pay his lawyer, and it seemed obvious that Vincent Bridges
was behind that.
At this point, we had almost agreed
to a really stupid settlement just to get past the whole thing,
but a letter from Frank's attorney to our attorney put a period
to that agreement. He wrote:
"I think you would be well advised to take control over your
clients lest this opportunity to amicably resolve this matter be
lost. […] My patience and my client's checkbook are exhausted.
[…] One final note, you should disabuse your client of the
notion that they are receiving nothing under the settlement.
Rest assured that they are receiving much more than they would
ever get if this case were litigated."
Having consulted several of the best copyright attorneys in the
country, courtesy of one of our readers, I knew this was either
a huge bluff, or that Frank's attorney was being given extremely
distorted information. Having dealt with Vincent Bridges and his
penchant for lying and covering lies with more lies, I
recognized the pattern. I just simply got angry at the endless
games Frank and Vincent were playing with other people's lives,
including Frank's mother and ourselves. It was about the
filthiest, low class behavior I had ever witnessed in my life,
and I just could NOT believe that Frank was a participant.
Through the research done to write
the Adventures Series, we had already come to the realization
that Vincent was a psychopath. This was the explanation that
"fit" his behavior, as well as the clues given by the C's. What
was distressing was coming to the realization that this was
obviously descriptive of Frank as well. But then, I realized
that the clues had always been there - that this must be what
Frank had always been, and it was only me who had not seen it.
I decided that enough was enough. I sat down and wrote a letter
to Frank explaining exactly what he was up against and what was
going to happen to him, to his mother, to his entire future, if
he did not wake up. I pointed out that, once it was in court,
there would be no further lies. It would be all evidence - and
Frank simply didn't have any. I was sickened at the thought that
his mother's money would be spent to litigate a case that he was
doomed to lose. More than that, I felt it would kill her. I
included with this letter the only acceptable agreement we would
sign. I sent a copy to his mother.
I could not be sure that it would be
delivered, because I was aware (from his past behavior and
revelations) that it was very likely that he was withholding
information from her, even including intercepting her mail. So,
that was the situation at the time we had the following session
April 25, 2002
Laura, Ark
Q: (L) Hello.
A: Hello.
Q: (L) And who do we have with us this evening?
A: Figliaea.
Q: (L) And where do you transmit through?
A: Cassiopaea.
Q: (L) Do you have any messages for us tonight before we begin
questions?
A: Frank is not going to sign the agreement.
Q: (L) What is he going to do?
A: Pout and wait for destruction.
Q: (L) Well, anything else?
A: Give a lie what it asks for: truth.
Q: (L) Well, in this case which particular truth is being asked
for?
A: Open.
Q: (L) I see. In other words file suit?
A: Close. Write.
Q: (L) Write about the failed legal negotiations for the web
site?
A: Yes and more. Letters.
Q: (A) What letters?
A: To authorities.
Q: (A) What would it accomplish?
A: You may get action.
Q: (A) An action that will prompt Frank to sign an agreement?
A: Action that may get him in trouble with the law.
Q: (A) Why should it be to our advantage to get Frank in trouble
with the law, what should we gain? It looks selfish.
A: Publish the facts.
Q: (A) What would it accomplish, so we have fact, so what.
A: Make people aware he is in the wrong even if he refuses to
admit it. He is on self destruct mode now. Nothing can be done
now.
Q: (A) I get the impression that in a very clever way they are
succeeding by making us not really work on our stuff, all the
time to be busy with them and only them. They succeeded 100%.
A: But look how many people are learning from your experiences.
Q: (A) I have a problem seeing how that is relevant to what is
coming or how this...
A: Seeing the unseen is being learned by many through practical
example.
Q: (A) What about Noah?
A: Work on Noah is almost completed.
Q: (A) But it's not published.
A: It won't take long. You will get help.
Q: (L) Well I am partly of the opinion that a large part of the
time we school ourselves because we have a certain idea that
this is right or this is wrong or the other thing and sometimes
it takes more energy not to do something than to just do it with
some reasonable control. Its a lot harder if you're constantly
thinking don't do that, don't do that' don't do that, and then
finally you just do it, get it out of your system and you don't
feel bad, it's over with. Yes?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) What do we want to ask now?
A: Get some sleep!
End of Session
As a result of this session, I took steps to make sure that Frank's
mother - the REAL "authority" and "law" in his life - received the
essential information. Two days later, the agreement - as we
stipulated it - was agreed to and signed and the copyright issue was
settled.
(According to the agreement, none of its details can be
made public.)
Back to Contents
|