XI - Expanding the View
A comparison of the data from these separate reports emphatically
proves one point. Our current concept of the abduction experience is
too small, too limited, and far too simplified.
The Comparative
Chart lists 114 elements from the reports, including details which
were omitted in previous chapters because of space considerations.
When the data is categorized and correlated, some surprising
consistencies emerge that force the current view to expand, in both
quantity and quality.
Before beginning the comparison, however, it should be noted again
that four of the women underwent some regressive hypnosis: Beth,
Jane, Angie, and Amy, with three different hypnotists. Out of the
114 listed details on the Chart, Beth reported 87, Jane reported 77,
Amy 73, and Angie had 96. The other four women showed consistently
fewer reported details, although not significantly so. Polly had 67
of the 114 details in her account, Pat had 71, Lisa had 94, and
Anita reported 53. Almost all of the details, from each of the eight
women, came from pre-hypnotic recollections.
In the “Contacts” category there are eight different situations
reported, and seven of these eight have been reported by all of the
women. These include 240 UFO sightings; missing time as a child;
missing time as an adult; consciousness of an encounter;
virtual-reality events; telepathic communications; and the extension
of alien involvement into lives of other family members. Three of
them experienced missing time or abductions with other people.
The data indicates, then, that the phenomenon is not imaginary or
self-generated, that it is linked to the UFO sightings, that it
involves a generational interest on the part of the aliens, and that
contact can be made by remote means.
The “Aliens” category contains a surprising variety of physical
types reported, including some that are rarely mentioned elsewhere.
While all eight women encountered the Gray aliens, the Whites (insectoid)
and the hooded figures are almost as common, turning up in seven
accounts. Blond humanoid figures have been seen by six of the women,
as have the cat-eyed or reptoid type. Half of the women reported a
wrinkle-faced entity similar to a tall Gray or White, as well as a
shorter, often hairy creature variously referred to as a “troll” or
“dwarf.” And both a blue entity and a “Jesus” figure have been
witnessed by three of the women.
In addition to noting the variety of physical types, it is important
to realize that every combination of these different entities have
been reported working together in abduction scenarios. It is hard to
conclude, then, that the various types are really separate groups
carrying out separate functions or missions.
Abductees typically report undergoing some sort of physical
examination at one time or
another, as researchers have long acknowledged. A comparison of the
details reported
in the “Exam” category show that two areas of the human body are
most commonly
involved: the reproductive system and the brain. Only five of the
women remember
gynecological procedures, however, and only three of them report
possible implanted or
missing fetuses, so the aliens’ interest in reproduction or genetics
may not be their sole
purpose.
While this group comprises all women, they are not the only
sex reporting fetal
implantations or extractions, as bizarre as this seems. In one man’s
account, he recalled an abdominal incision into which a malleable
sac of tiny fetuses was placed and later surgically retrieved.
Another man said that a similar fetal container was inserted
rectally.
More of the women report implant procedures and “head operations”
than gynecological activity. Anita is the only one who does not
recall receiving an implant, and five women report some surgical
activity on their skulls or brains. This activity has no apparent
connection to a crossbreeding agenda and points to a program of
greater complexity than the limited “genetics” theory.
A variety of alien instruments are reported in these procedures, but
the most common here are the wand-type device, found in four
accounts, and the small metal box, usually black, which is reported
by three women.
There are four accounts of a “lady doctor” present during
examinations, and three of the women saw operations performed on
other abductees during their experiences. Three also were made to
eat or drink something while in alien custody.
The most common detail of the examination scenario, however, is the
report of an alien’s face very close to the abductee’s face, which
has been experienced by all of the women but Pat. Whether this is a
type of examination or an exertion of mental control over the
abductee isn’t clear, and of course it could be both. There is
evidence that the large, black, glassy eyes so familiar from Gray
reports may not be biological eyes but instead may be coverings that
perform technologically, able to calm the abductee, do a scan of
some sort, and even, as Pat felt, “film” or record data from our
minds.
Other activities besides the exams occur in abduction encounters.
All of the women report that the aliens communicated with them at
some point, although not during every encounter. And seven of them
recall teaching or testing sessions. During abductions, six report
experiencing levitation, five recall passing through solid objects,
and four witnessed or performed telekinesis. On the ‘hardware’ side
of things, four women were shown how to operate some of the
equipment aboard a craft, and on the ‘software’ side three of them
were induced to relive or envision a past time or event in their
lives. Again, these activities point to an agenda more complex than
crossbreeding.
Six of the women do, however, report scenes generally known as “baby
presentations” in which apparently hybrid infants are shown to
abductees and are said to be created from some human-alien
crossbreeding process. But half of the women also report being
forced or induced to engage in (mostly traumatic) sexual activities
with aliens, humanoids, or other abductees. And all these activities
have little to do with crossbreeding or gathering of reproductive
material.
Some researchers have theorized that all such sexual scenarios are
the product
of mind control-erotic images without substance-used merely to
facilitate an actual
event which involves nothing more than the taking of sperm or ova.
But there are
problems with this theory. For one thing, although sperm-gathering
can be
accomplished via erotically induced orgasm on the part of a male, it
certainly isn’t
necessary for ova-gathering.
In fact, it is totally unnecessary. Nor
does it serve a reproductive purpose for her to be compelled to
masturbate, as in some abductions, as well as in cases where the
person feels “switched on” for this purpose when no abduction is
underway. Another problem is that sexual intrusions involving
reproductively immature children are reported. And finally, there is
clearly no sperm/ova gathering going on in those situations where
abductees are forced into sexual situations together.
Abductees report a wide yet consistent pattern of communications
from the aliens, both in their presence and through remote contact.
The most common communications focus on the origin of the human
species, the “special” nature of the alien-abductee relationship and
of the abductee personally who has an important function to perform,
the distinction of body and spirit, and warnings of future global
destruction, which were all reported by a majority of the women.
These are not trivial subjects. It would be as dangerous to ignore
this information as it would be to believe everything the aliens
say.
In the “Settings” category there is a similar consistency of
reports, including the highly controversial scenario of the
underground base, present in half of the cases. Even more
surprising, perhaps, is that seven of the women saw other apparently
human people in their encounters, working with the aliens aboard
craft as well as in the terrestrial facilities. And in six cases,
the humans were perceived as military personnel.
Many researchers have, unfortunately, been unwilling to take reports
of human-alien collusion seriously. One researcher told me that he
believed every case of human collusion could be explained as
illusions perpetrated by an exclusively alien group. But all it
takes to dispel this view is one confirmed case of military or human
involvement, and from information that has been shared with me in
confidence, I am satisfied that at least one such case exists, that
of Leah Haley, whose ordeal of military intrusions and threats is
told in
LOST WAS THE KEY.
Another researcher has claimed repeatedly that none of his many
investigations has produced reports or evidence of human military
involvement. His claim, however, has been disputed by some of the
abductees with whom he has worked, who say they have indeed reported
these events only to have them discounted by the investigator.
Yet the reports overwhelmingly point to actual human involvement
with alien abductions. Details of reports are consistent throughout
the country, and the only thing that differs, finally, is the
interpretation of those details by the researchers. Reports of human
military involvement must be addressed with more than an unexamined
dismissal, for they are as common as the baby presentation scenarios
that are accepted at face value by the traditional view. Whether
“real” or contrived, these events serve a purpose that the
researchers need to discover.
Six other accounts described the abductees either viewing or being
in a desert setting or on a desert-type planet, although the
explanation of this scene varies from one report to another.
Within the alien facilities, five women saw television-type screens,
four saw instrument
panels, and four were shown graphs or charts. And although it isn’t
noted on the Chart, three
women described unusual black, flexible tubing in the facilities,
both aboard the craft and in
underground locations.
Other reported details in alien settings included bodies of water or
liquid, in three cases, as well as three reports of animals present.
Of more concern are the three accounts of abductees seeing, or being
told of, cloned human bodies. Both Lisa and Pat were shown clones of
their bodies, although they were given different explanations.
Similar reports come from other abductees, and in one case a man
said he saw a room full of inert male and female human bodies, who
were beautiful and identical. The implications of such reports are
enormous, considering the possible uses the aliens could make of
these carbon-copy human bodies.
The eight women reported a number of physical effects, consistent
with general abduction data, but the only two effects which were
universal were patterns of unexplained bruises and particular noises
in the ear or head. While the noises could be rationalized, perhaps,
the bruises clearly indicate some physical interaction. The
repetition of triangular marks in abductee reports may well indicate
a single source for all of the marks.
Other signs of physical, rather than psychic or spiritual, contact
include six reports of unexplained blood on the women’s bodies or
bedclothes, six reports of scoop marks, five women with scratches,
and seven with puncture wounds. The case for actual physical contact
is also bolstered by the six women who reported waking up with their
clothing on backward, inside out, or completely missing.
The women experienced a variety of other physical reactions in
addition to the internally heard beeps and electronic-type tones.
All but Pat, for instance, experienced nausea during or after an
encounter, and five reported sudden, total exhaustion in which all
their energy drained away in an instant. Five women described
awaking at times and feeling as if they’d been “beaten,” to use
Anita’s term. And five said they had episodes in which a blinding
light seemed to explode in their minds.
Unexplained rashes turned up in five of the cases, and instances of
badly irritated eyes and waking with an unidentified bitter taste
were both reported four times. Additionally, two of the women
suffered unusual hair loss and unaccountable “sunburns.”
The physical nature of the abduction scenario extends to other
things in the abductee’s environment. The external effects related
to the phenomenon are very consistent, as the Chart demonstrates.
Every one of the women have experienced bizarre electronic
disturbances, for instance, and phone disturbances, both with the
equipment and the callers. And seven out of eight reported lights in
the yard, lights in the house, voices, clicking sounds, as well as
miscellaneous thumps, pops, whistles, bangs, and hums in the
environment, all without explanation. Outside the house, five of the
women have witnessed the overflight of unaccountable, unmarked, or
unidentifiable helicopters, all appearing after the abductees became
aware of their situations.
The most consistent correlations between the women show up in the
“Personal
Response/Event” category. All of them suffer from chronic or
frequent sleep disruption,
all have undergone drastic attitude shifts, and they all feel a
strong desire to live in rural
locations, no matter what their previous backgrounds. Seven of the
eight women report
unexplained compulsions associated with their experiences, such as
Polly’s compulsion at times to take children, including other
people’s children, to a certain spot where UFOs are often sighted,
something she would not do of her own choice. And Anita is the only
one who has not reported feeling they are being prepared to carry
out some unidentified task, job, or mission related to the alien
agenda.
Three types of dreams show up in seven of the reports, as well. The
first involves the arrival or landing or invasion of numerous UFOs
on earth, a dream reported so frequently with the same details that
I refer to it as ‘The Night of Lights,” from the typical
description. The second dream shows scenes of coming disaster and
chaos on the planet, and in some cases the abductees are led to
believe that their upcoming “jobs” will be carried out at the time
of destruction. The third dream type is prophetic, showing events
which come to pass after the dream.
The final category, “Personal Background,” shows, in fact, that all
of the women have demonstrated above-average psychic abilities. The
data on ethnic background included here has only relative
importance, focusing as it does on the Celtic and Native American
heritages which are more prevalent in American abduction reports
than any other specific ethnic groups. The abduction phenomenon is
global, and in any given region the ethnicity would surely be
different. What is significant, however, is the high percentage of
the women who have had unusual or serious gynecological problems, an
indication that abduction experiences may be hazardous to their
health.
The two remaining aspects of personal background, childhood abuse
and a family member in the intelligence community, deserve special
notice. Some researchers and mental health professionals, unable to
accept the reality of this phenomenon, have offered screened
memories of child abuse as an explanation for abduction memories.
But as in the case of objections to military involvement, all it
takes is one abductee who suffered no abuse to explode the theory.
Among these eight women, only three reported childhood abuse of any
kind, and their memories of these events were not repressed.
Other theorists believe that abduction activity is perpetrated by
humans rather than aliens, carrying out massive mind-control
experiments for some unknown purpose. They argue that the agents of
this activity would have access to “subjects” through the families
of those in the military and intelligence organizations.
While it is
true that most abductees have a family member in the military, that
is also true of just about everyone in the country, so that cannot
be a significant factor. More telling would be an inordinately high
number of abductees with family connections to the intelligence
community, and such cases are reported. Among the eight women,
however, there are only two confirmed, and one possible, with
connections to intelligence work.
These individual, very unique, abduction reports show such a
commonality that they all
could quite easily be from a single source, or alliance of sources,
with a single, specific
agenda. Some of the reported details, in fact, which appear so
unique in a given single
case, are too striking to dismiss. One good example not listed on
the Chart involves
Pat and Angie, whose conscious memories and responses are very
different. During
Pat’s childhood abduction, she asked for and was given a “green
healer rock” as a
keepsake, but when the military interrogated the family, they
persuaded Pat’s sister to give them the rock.
In Angie’s case, a green rock was also confiscated. She didn’t
consciously connect the beautiful green rock with alien experiences,
nor could she remember precisely when and where she first got it.
But Angie does remember, as a child, being approached on the
playground one day by an unknown woman. The woman knew Angie’s name
and a few things about her, claiming to be a friend of the girl’s
teacher. After a brief initial chat, the woman told Angie that she
knew about the green rock and asked if she could have it. Angie
recalls giving her the rock during a second encounter, although the
details are cloudy.
There are other such minute similarities in just these eight
accounts, and the details on the Chart generally are true not only
for the eight women but also for thousands of others.
There is one more set of parallels, however, which was not on the
Chart because it pertained exclusively to the women in this project
rather than to the typical abduction situation. I was in contact
with all of them separately for months before deciding to compile a
book-length report about the cases, and during that time, although
strange things still occurred, they did not seem any different from
past activities. Things changed, however, after Jane and Amy were
given messages telling them to work with me specifically.
I began the book project, and in the course of taking care of
necessary business through the mail, it soon became clear that many
of my letters to the women were being diverted. It was an annoyance,
but a minor one. But then the women began having serious problems,
physical afflictions of a suspiciously similar nature.
Beth was first.
On the night she decided to participate in the
project, she phoned a friend to discuss the decision, but in the
midst of the conversation the line went dead. That night, she had
disturbing but cloudy dreams, and the next morning both her legs
from knees to ankles were in excruciating pain for no apparent
reason. And then she had a sudden, frightening flashback that linked
the mysterious pain with military personnel warning her not to be a
part of the book.
That was in early October 1993. Three weeks later, after discussing
my determination to do the project with one of the women, I went to
bed in fine shape and woke up at 6 a.m. with wracking, spasmodic
pains in both legs, from my knees to my ankles. It was unbelievably
bad, unlike any pain I’ve had before, and after swallowing ibuprofin
I hobbled back to bed and tried to sleep. I must have, for I dreamed
after that, seeing myself surrounded by military personnel who were
injecting something into my knees.
They taunted me, saying,
“Don’t
think you can do anything you want. This is just a little
demonstration that we can bring you, literally, to your knees any
time we choose.”
For Beth and me, these may have been mere dreams, reflecting our
fears about the project.
But Anita’s report of experiencing this same pain after an
abduction, years before, makes it harder
to discount a connection. And on the same weekend I had the leg
pains, both Anita and Jane
suffered unexpected gall bladder attacks, so severe that they both
underwent emergency surgery at almost the same hour.
Angie was the next to suffer. After an abduction in early November,
she woke up with several physical symptoms, the worst of which was
heavy congestion. It quickly grew worse, and in the space of less
than two months she had to be hospitalized. Before that time,
however, her health had been remarkably pristine. It was in
November, too, that Angie recalls military personnel threatening
punishment if she “talked to Karla Turner.”
Was it a real event, a VRS, or just a dream? Anita had a similar
dream shortly thereafter, in which I first discussed abandoning the
project and then military personnel arrived and interrogated her
about UFOs. Lisa, too, felt a very human threat against her
involvement with the book and almost decided to remove herself from
it. But in the end, all of the women felt that the information was
too important to let intimidation, if that’s what it really was,
prevent its release.
To conclude, then, the Comparative Chart shows how consistently the
same details turn up in unrelated abduction scenarios, and indeed
how many consistent details actually comprise the phenomenon. Such
reports demand that serious attention be given to uncovering the
nature and extent of human activity within the abduction phenomenon.
The evidence further makes a strong case for a very physical,
technological basis to alien-human interactions. Unless angels
perform rectal probes, however, and make crank phone calls, and
arrange sexual liaisons in addition to their other heavenly duties,
the case is very weak for this being a primarily spiritual agenda.
Back to Contents
XII - The Round Table
When these personal accounts are brought together for an overview,
the women have three major concerns, in common with many others who
have had forced alien encounters.
-
What are the aliens saying, and
can we believe them?
-
What are they doing with us, technologically
and psychologically?
-
And what is the real nature of human or
military involvement in the abduction activities?
On this last issue, every one of the women have reported seeing
other humans present in abduction situations. Amy, Angie, Lisa, Pat
and Beth recall experiences that involved military personnel, and in
most instances there were aliens working with the humans.
Although
some of these scenes may have been alien VRS productions, other
peripheral activities do indicate actual human involvement. Angie,
for instance, was confronted and intimidated by uniformed men in the
pickups that pinned her between them on the highway, just hours
before she had a military abduction and was threatened about
“talking.”
When Amy traveled out of state for regressive hypnosis, another
suspicious event occurred. A high-ranking naval officer, a long-time
acquaintance of the hypnotist’s family, showed up at their home late
on the night of Amy’s arrival, in spite of being told that it would
not be convenient to visit at that time. He proceeded to deliver the
standard “line” that the military has no interest, much less
involvement, with UFOs, aliens, or abductees. He said that in
twenty-five years of service he had never even heard another
military person mention UFOs, on or off the record. And he insisted
that abductees had no business presenting their experiences to the
public unless they could also offer “concrete, scientific evidence”
that anything had happened.
I was present that night, and when I asked him if he actually could
tell us of any military involvement with UFOs, assuming it did
exist, he admitted that “national security” restrictions would force
him to deny such involvement.
When Amy left to drive home, she was followed by a state patrol car
who stayed inches from her bumper or right beside her car for many
miles. The effect, of course, was extremely unnerving, and Amy felt
it was meant to be an intimidation, as do those who have had
military helicopter harassment, phone disturbances, and other events
that seem much more human than alien in origin.
If, as was mentioned earlier, there is proof in even one case that
military personnel have been involved in abductions, then the other
reports should not be easily dismissed. Each person must decide what
evidence is convincing on this issue, but I am satisfied that one
case, Leah Haley’s, is beyond question. If human agencies are indeed
covertly active, their involvement demands more vigorous
investigation than has been done up to now. Mainstream researchers,
however, show no enthusiasm for confronting possible human-rights
violations by human forces, perhaps because they fear personal
reprisal-which, as many abductees can attest, does occur.
On the issue of alien communications, there is plenty of data from
all of the women.
Most of them have had personal messages in addition to hearing their
names called.
“The communication that has happened when I’m awake,” Lisa reported,
as an
example, “is usually simple. They say in my head, Turn off the
lights and don’t come in here’.”
After Anita was sexually assaulted
by the humanoid in the red suit, he told her,
“I’ll be there to help
you,” which was frightening rather than reassuring given the
immediate situation. And Amy had a curious message in late 1993,
saying, “All will know of UFOs on the day of the big game,” although
which big game was not identified.
Some of the personal messages, described previously, made direct
references to me, once the women began working to investigate their
experiences. Jane was told to give all her “information to Karla
Turner” and to assist me in awakening others to the abduction
phenomenon. Amy was compelled to contact me by her influencing
forces, and then when she consciously asked them if they had any
message for me, they told her to tell me,
“Do take care. Lock your
doors-it may help more than you know.”
The message was so absurd
that Amy challenged it and was told, “She will know what it means.”
When Amy wrote me, she did not pass along that message, although she
typed it and put it away.
Months later, when she was listening to a tape of a public
presentation I had made, however, she heard me say that at one point
I was so disheartened by the alien activity that I didn’t even
bother to lock my doors. Shocked by the correlation, she finally
told me about the message she’d gotten earlier.
And when Polly asked
her “spirits,” as she called the unseen communicators, about this
book project, she was given a lengthy reply. In part, they said that
the book “is a journey into another level of mind” and that my books
“are a part of a much larger work from which she cannot be
separated... an expansive work of love, resting on a solid base.”
It is impossible not to wonder what these specific personal
references mean. They certainly show that some force or group is
aware of the connections between the women and my research, which
may account for the helicopter flights and telephone interference so
many of us have had. During a phone conversation with Angie, in
fact, as we discussed one alien group’s claim to originate in
Cassiopeia, a man’s voice interrupted to say, "There’s a lot of them
out there, and we know where they come from”... - and then the voice was
gone.
These references also demonstrate foreknowledge of certain events or
the ability to direct events, for whoever gave Amy the message about
my locking the door seems to have known she would later, much later,
hear a tape of my remarks. These specific references connect our
separate experiences within a larger organized agenda, that much is
clear, although the coordinators of this activity are not, and it
seems to be quite a long-term project.
Many of the women had alien communications very early in their
lives. Anita reported being told as a child that “The children must
be protected.” Amy had messages and ideas impressed into her mind
from as young as four, and like Polly she felt the impact of these
influences in her early teen years. She also felt that the aliens
implanted or stored information within the subconscious, in
“packets” of knowledge, reminiscent of the “pockets” of knowledge
the aliens told me I possessed in 1980.
Throughout their lives, several women recalled teaching or training
communications. For
Amy, these included information about various aspects of physics, as
with Polly, as
well as lessons in telekinesis and penetrating solid objects.
Angie’s training has focused on using her mental powers, and Anita’s
propelled her to study useful survival skills. This training or
programming of abductees is meant to serve some purpose, but we have
only the aliens’ claims for what that purpose may be.
Much of what the aliens have communicated has affected the women’s
attitudes on a variety of subjects. In childhood, Amy witnessed an
apparent VRS designed to destroy her faith in traditional religion,
and Polly reported lessons on “changes in allegiance.” Anita, Jane,
and Amy also have come to feel suspicious of temporal governments, a
suspicion that Jane says was “fostered” by the aliens.
Such an
attitude adjustment is clearly an intrinsic part of the abduction
agenda, pointing to a much more involved and disturbing program than
the mere taking of genetic material to revivify a degenerative alien
race. Their actions concern changing our belief system as much as
working, for whatever reason, with our bodies, and we do not know
the motivation for this targeting of religion and government.
On the subject of human genesis, the aliens often say they are our
creators, as in Angie’s case, and statements about altering our
species were also made to Lisa. The most provocative message, given
to Amy, indicated a surprise on the part of the aliens that Amy
hadn’t clearly seen the situation already. “Did you think this was
all by accident?” she was asked, as the aliens presented the concept
of the earth as a cosmic zoo.
Such indoctrination serves to reduce our concepts of human
sovereignty, as well as to bind us to them in a subservient
position, as a possession. While some people accept this
relationship as fact and thus allow that the aliens can legitimately
do with us what they please, there are others of us who feel we
possess an inherent sovereignty and right to exist without
interference, no matter what our genesis. Their claims to be our
creators have never been more than mere claims, anyway, unless there
is proof somewhere, as a few researchers report from intelligence
and military insiders.
As for information on the aliens themselves, they are less
forthcoming. Lisa was told that there are “many divisions” of the
beings, and Jane has observed that while some of them are
interdimensional, as Polly also believes, others are actually
“interplanetary travelers.”
An origin in Cassiopeia was stated to
Angie, although the alien said their group had long ago made a
“home” for themselves on our planet. Beth was told only that the
aliens are here for study and to “avert a destructive process” that
humanity is bringing upon the world. The most extreme communication
of origin, however, was given to Pat. She was told that the aliens
are angels, although not as we’d been taught to think of them, and
that they will be responsible for the changing of human bodies at
the time of resurrection. Jane, conversely, has been made to see,
from her experiences, that the God of the Bible “is not the supreme
being we have been taught to envision.”
A common communication has been that the abductees are to come
together or “find”
others like themselves. In fact, Angie reported being brought to a
group of “Chosen Ones”
in an underground facility.
“There were others trained like me,” Amy
said she was told in
1989, “and we would come together soon. Now it is time that we find
each other.”
Beth was
told that she and others must work as “spiritual” beings “for the
good of humanity,” and
the aliens told Jane that “All good people of earth must come
together to resist what is coming.”
It isn’t certain, of course,
that all the communications have come from a single source, and in
fact there are frequently contradictions and inconsistencies from
case to case.
The future planetary events are also a major topic for the aliens,
and it is interesting to note the phrases and images they use here.
For Jane, the aliens have used terms like “the awakening” to
indicate coming changes in “world cultures and consciousness.”
This
sounds positive and peaceful enough, but both Amy and Polly have
been told of a coming “Armageddon,” although Amy was told that
Armageddon “will not be as people think it will be.” Angie’s
abductors said that the “filth and evil” in this world will be
cleansed as we are subtly changed. But for Anita and Lisa, the
future changes are shown as disasters for which they must prepare to
survive here on earth.
And Pat has been shown scenes of the return of Jesus, accompanied by
space ships and aliens, preceding the “bad time on earth” which will
destroy many of those who are not rescued. Indeed, to Amy, Beth,
Jane, and Polly, the communications have indicated a war of good and
evil underway, in which we have a part to play.
And as for the
aliens’ promised assistance, Lisa has said simply,
“Why should we
believe they can fix our problems when they can’t even control the
abusive aliens among them?”
How do the women feel about their alien communications? Jane is
inspired by much of what she’s told, but she has not been able to
initiate the communications herself. In fact, she feels that the
aliens have hidden, in a way, behind their contacts.
“We’re not
seeing the true intelligence behind all these scenes,” she once
said. Polly says that when she considers all she has been told, she
concludes that in reality, ‘They have told us nothing.”
And Amy has
complained that in spite of all she’s been told and taught, the
aliens “don’t give [practical] information.”
Angie has come to be suspicious of much of what she has been told.
"There’s no reason I should trust those aliens,” she wrote, “any
more than I would trust my own kind.” And Anita has echoed that
feeling. “I’m always amazed when I get any information from them at
all,” she said. “I really don’t know if someone who would abduct a
person could be trusted to give a truthful answer to any question.”
The second issue focuses on alien technology as observed by the
abductees. Besides the various instruments used in examinations,
most of which are completely foreign, it is curious to note how
often the aliens employ quite familiar equipment, especially needles
and injections. Indeed, some researchers have said that this use of
mundane technology argues against an alien force and toward covert
human activity.
Angie, Beth, and Polly all report getting shots, and
the other women have sometimes found injection punctures without
remembering how they got them. But the most common technological
devices are not at all human-like: the probes. Their descriptions
are often very similar-small balls of light floating or bouncing
through the house-but in Amy’s case the probe was rather more
“spidery” in appearance.
As mentioned earlier, there is a strong interest in human brains
evinced by the aliens’ activities.
Amy, Angie, Beth, Lisa, Pat and Polly all reported having some
operation performed on their
brains, and they often used the exact same descriptions, of feeling
as if their skulls were opened and their brains temporarily removed.
But by far the most alarming evidence of alien technology concerns
the “new” bodies and “clones” they manufacture. Whether these are
really bodies for a future human “resurrection,” as Pat was told,
remains to be seen, for other explanations have been given. In a
case privately reported, for instance, a man was told that a
duplicate of his body could be used to “replace” him if he didn’t
“cooperate” with the aliens.
Lisa, too, was told that other people
wouldn’t be able to distinguish her cloned body from the original,
if they chose to replace her. And Angie was shown the cloned infants
as part of a “novel breed” the aliens are producing.
Polly has a different take on what may be going on with the baby
presentations.
“What’s the point?” she asked. “Not to nurture this
crossbred infant, not to teach the ETs about emotional love and
physical bonding, but to blow our goddamn minds. They use our bodies
to get to our minds and emotions.”
She doesn’t believe they care
anything about our bodies, “except that WE care very much, so that
is why our bodies are important to them: to get at our caring.”
This view is echoed by Angie. When she was shown one of her “hybrid”
offspring, she felt that the presentation was a test of her rather
than anything to do with the baby itself.
“From that particular
experience, I learned that the hybrid presentation liturgy is not a
bonding exercise,” she concluded. “In reality it is an act of
scrutiny against the mother’s measure of courage and understanding.
It has a lot to do with mental pain and how the mother deals with
it.”
Concerning the clones or hybrids themselves, she was further told
that their souls are “recycled” and that they are regenerated many
times. This fits in with other reports in which abductees saw the
aliens destroy fetuses and were told they are not “really alive” and
that their physical material will be used, not wasted. In fact,
these and other reports point to the use of human genetic material
to produce the Gray workers, quite possibly biological “robots”
rather than living, soul-inhabited, entities.
The other major technological question concerns the implants, for
which the aliens have given various explanations. When Jane received
an ear implant, she was told that it affects “brain chemicals and
certain subtle functions.” The aliens told Angie that the implants
“act as a magnet and pull information from people’s brains” as well
as enhancing the use of “special senses” and sending “instructions.”
But Amy was given very different information about the implants by
the masked alien who removed hers. Besides being shown where the
implants are placed and the fact that they operate on the abductee’s
own electrical brain activity, she was also told how the implants
are used to control abductees, punish them, and even kill them.
And although no one was told that the implants are used to create
the virtual-reality scenarios, that possibility must be considered.
The technology behind the VRS is a subject upon which the aliens
have been silent, but the effects of the VRS are apparent. Only Amy
has been given any information about the images created by aliens,
when she was told that they use frightening images for control. One
of the aliens told Angie that the military also uses “illusions,”
but this was not explained.
Several of the women have their own ideas about what is behind the
virtual-reality scenarios. Besides the control factor mentioned by
Amy, Anita believes there may be a positive purpose for some of the
VRS activity.
“I suspect a lot of these encounters,” she said, “are
alien-induced dreams, for the purpose of making sure you feel
comfortable with them.”
Lisa said, “I believe sometimes I’m made to
dream odd things to see my reaction to them.”
And Jane, too,
believes the aliens sometimes create frightening “set-up scenes,
absurd stuff,” which has made her uneasy. “I’m afraid,” she
confided, “we might find that intelligence [behind the illusions] so
cold and impersonal that it would be unbearable.”
Given all their experiences, what do the women themselves think
about the aliens, their encounters, and the agenda to come? Pat is
the only one who had unequivocally positive feelings and trust in
the aliens-before her encounter with the “oriental girl” in the
underground facility, that is-for her perception of them has been
shaped since her childhood to see them as angelic beings.
Jane,
Angie, and Beth all recognize positive and negative forces among the
aliens, and while Amy has been threatened and silenced through the
years by the aliens, she still says,
“I don’t think all aliens are
bad. I don’t even consider the Grays that are abusing humans and
other life forms as ‘bad’-they have their reasons and think
differently from us, so they probably do not understand our
feelings.”
Angie goes further, saying,
“Perfectly real aliens exist out there,
and it seems one kind wants to help us and another kind wants to
deceive us.”
Anita has recognized differing agendas among the groups
who have interacted with her.
She thinks,
-
the Grays care very little
about humans personally
-
the humanoids are involved with sexual
aspects of the phenomenon (from her conscious recollections, at
least)
-
the Tans are concerned to bind us to them through our
emotions
Polly has expressed many ideas about the alien agenda.
“I know many
feel they [aliens] need reproductive material from us,” she wrote,
“but the way it feels to me is, although there may be the aspect
that we are a resource, it feels like a highly sophisticated mind
game.”
And she recognizes, as has Anita, that the mind game can be
very effective.
“Intellectually I can say, ‘They are out for
control; don’t trust them’,” Polly has confided. “But, Karla,
emotionally and deep in my mind I trust certain ones of them more
than anything else in the universe. And I have been confronting bit
by bit the evidence that they made me feel this way for their
purposes, to fulfill their agenda, not for my good. The depth of my
trust, I think, is more frightening than the depth of my fear.” Like
Anita, she recognizes the directed nature of her response.
‘Their consistent theme is control,” she continued. “It is maddening
to realize that although we strive to empower ourselves and know
that we can claim and enforce our own mental sovereignty, still so
often they slip by our defenses...and own parts of us which by
rights we should have in our conscious possession.”
In spite of what some prominent abduction theorists tell us about
avoiding thinking in
terms of “good and evil” or “positive and negative” when it comes to
the aliens, this
simply cannot be done, nor should it be. For these women, for my
husband and myself,
for all abductees, knowing that we have been made a part of this
agenda and that we
have been implanted, trained, and programmed to participate in some
future scenario, how can we not ask to what purpose our minds,
bodies, and souls will be used? How can we put aside our
rationality, our learned wisdom, and our ethics to trust the words
and actions of beings whose nature is kept hidden from us and whose
agenda involves the entire world?
More immediately, what can be done to alter the abduction situation?
Is there any sign that things are changing? The answer is a cautious
yes, there is evidence of a change in the ‘standard operating
procedure’ of abduction events over the last forty or fifty years.
On the part of the aliens, there seems to have been a quantitative
and qualitative increase in abduction activity since the mid-1980s
in this country. Whereas most events in the past were deeply
suppressed in the abductees’ memories, by 1986 hundreds, if not
thousands, of abductees began to remember past experiences and to be
more currently aware of new ones.
Either the aliens were not doing a
good job of suppressing the memories, or something was triggering a
wake-up call in the abductees. Further, more abductees were
reporting a variety of alien physical types, not just the small Gray
workers typically encountered in the past.
An argument can be made that this awareness was initiated
deliberately by the aliens, as part of the preparation for the
predicted coming global event in which abductees will be activated
to perform their “tasks.”
But a different argument can also be made, that abductees were
waking up on their own, many times “seeing through” the illusions
and virtual-reality scenarios as Anita did when she told the Tan
entity who was projecting love toward her, "Too bad it isn’t real.”
In several recent reports, in fact, abductees have penetrated the
aliens’ illusions and refused to cooperate as the aliens would have
had them do. The growth and changes resulting from alien contact may
yet prove to be a double-edged sword, giving abductees a heightened
awareness and psychic perception that allows them to evaluate and
react to their situations in ways they could not have done before.
It has been said that any species, in an environment of extreme
stress and questionable survival, may develop new coping mechanisms
to ensure that the species continue to exist. Could this be part of
what is happening now? Certainly an intrusion of an advanced,
controlling force on a widespread scale could generate enough
“species stress” to trigger new response mechanisms.
Studies of human consciousness development theorize that the
emergence of bicameralism-the division of the psyche into conscious
and subconscious components-occurred relatively recently in human
evolution, perhaps no more than five thousand years ago, in a fairly
sudden way and with no known precipitating cause.
-
Could it be that
we are once again experiencing a psychic change, a movement toward
“tricameralism” that will give us a new form of conscious
perception?
-
Are we developing new abilities to recognize energies
and entities which have hitherto been beyond our ken, and thus new
ways to respond?
Many people who see alien interaction as a positive event for
humanity point to the growth and changes abductees often evince as
proof that the aliens are working to elevate the psychic abilities
of our race. Angie has said, echoing the reports of numerous other
abductees,
“I have grown in many ways. My IQ and receptiveness to
learning has improved a lot, and I am more in tune to nature as well
as myself and other human beings.”
Defenders of alien interaction
claim that these sorts of changes are a deliberate product of the
contact experience, evidence of the aliens’ benevolent interest in
humanity.
It is odd, however, that such growth seems to come to abductees only
after they are
aware of their
experiences. If indeed this growth is produced by the aliens, then
it should have been there long before the abductees were conscious
of their encounters, since in almost every reported case there are
signs of alien involvement since early childhood. The psychic
increase and growth of perceptive abilities, however, occurring
after the abductee is aware of the intrusions, may indicate a
different genesis-an internal evolution of consciousness-stemming
from our need to know what is and has been done to us and what we
can do to meet the situation in a more empowered position.
Survivors of great catastrophes such as hurricanes, earthquakes, or
war, may be crushed by the impact of these events, losing their
usual ethical considerations and sense of self that is the basis of
psychic stability. Or they may find a new resilience, rising to the
occasion and reacting with abilities they didn’t know they
possessed.
Given the vast intrusive activities of the abduction phenomenon, we
as a species may
well feel such a threat or stress that a “mutational” or
evolutionary leap is occurring
today, developing a tricameralism of the mind, allowing us to
confront the intruders and
see them more clearly than they have allowed in the past.
On the
basis of many recent
abduction reports, there is hope that our species is awakening.
Back to Contents
|