23 - Further Dangers of Electrogravity

There’s evidence that misuse of electrogravity (a kind of artificial gravity) can have harmful side effects.

Such dangers are due to Δt, the speeding of time caused by the fact that electrogravity and magnetogravity (gravitics) borrow large amounts of energy from empty space in order to exceed the speed of light. The negative cycle that defines electrogravity connects small, exotic “negative energy” fluctuations of space-time. Ultimately, such fluctuations can resonate across great distances because the universe has no outer edge. Instead, hyperspace connects phenomena on a cosmic scale to fluctuations on a micro-scale.

And when negative energy fluctuations connect via electrogravity and magnetogravity, they slightly change the flow of time.

As various aliens have pointed out, large-scale use of electrogravity can speed the clock on a given people’s sun, and if used without delicate countervailing safeguards, can lead to seismic, atmospheric, or other instabilities.

But what happens when electrogravity is used directly on humans during abductions and psychotronic communications, or during “soft” weapons use? Are there any dangers?

There certainly are. Some abductees report radiation burns on their bodies after being near alien craft. Such burns may occur when electrogravity converts into electromagnetism (radiation) a la Bearden.

Worse yet, if electrogravity/magnetogravity is used directly on humans, it can speed the clock on human gene structures, which is dangerous because human genes have a limited number of telomeres, structures that shorten in length each time a cell replicates. Since electrogravity speeds time in areas surrounding its focus, it could shorten telomeres and prematurely age human tissue during abductions and other uses.

Again, this is due to Bearden’s Δt, a basic universal energy conservation.

Prematurely aged genetic material is prone to mutation and cancer. So, when alien abductors use gravitics to slow brain processes and limit human awareness, the Δt effect speeds time in surrounding body tissues.

This is partly why aliens genetically engineer themselves to tolerate such radiation both during travel and while using psychotronic technology. Ironically, when gravitics are used in finely-adjusted, advanced ways they should allow for longer cell life and hardier living systems, i.e. when doing direct energy feed to body cells, re-configuration of genetic material to retard aging, accelerated healing, and replacement of damaged cells.

Such advances aren’t achieved overnight, however. As was noted earlier, hyperversal aliens know how to deftly converge and cancel out multiple categories of gravitic energy by spreading it out so that the effects aren’t so immediately local, which minimizes the apparent speeding of time (albeit at a Δt cost to the larger continuum). Again, this is the “alt t” that some hyperversals have hinted about.

IFSP - Intergalactic Federation of Sovereign Planets - aliens like the grays may not be able to correct the Δt effects of their technology on humans, so humans should be wary of abductions, propagandistic displays of gravitic technology, and so on. The spectacle of abductors’ technology seems awesome to humans but if the price is destabilization of your sun, then forced refuge in a lifeless star system, it may not be worth it.

By now, Verdants, who reportedly live longer than other IFSP aliens, should be able to either minimize Δt or possibly alt-cycle it, which may help to explain why they live so long. Nonetheless, the fact that other IFSP aliens haven’t been afforded the same life-prolonging health care suggests that we shouldn’t always expect IFSP aliens to use gravitics on humans in healthy ways.

There are political and resource issues surrounding the question of who lives longest to be best educated in a large collective like the IFSP. That’s complicated by the emotional desensitization that comes with greatly extended lifetime.

Hyperversal aliens of much longer duration have repeatedly pointed out a further risk in the overuse of gravitic technologies. Δt hyper-dynamics point to the fact that gravitic technologies ever so slightly shorten the duration of a universe cycle. Even though hyper-advanced aliens can minimize Δt locally, they can only do so at a total cost to a universe cycle’s duration.

This poses a dilemma for all aliens.

To recklessly shorten the duration of an entire universe cycle would be irresponsible, hence, as humans are now beginning to learn, larger conventions regarding the use of gravitic technology appear to have been discussed - long before the appearance of human civilization.

In order to get the basic drift of off-world conventions in this regard, humans need to essentially step out of their skin to try and see the universe as a variety of other aliens do. In a universe where aliens live and connect in hyperspace, there are political exigencies on a galaxy scale, and larger. Some populations tend to a variety of far-flung planets, dependencies and resource locations.

Some situations of the sort involve manipulation of less developed, less capable populations. In such cases, a more advanced population may think it has achieved a relative mastery of negative cycle technology. Nonetheless, there may be gaps in the knowledge of aliens who evolved such technology within the last billion years or so. They may not know the extent to which gravitic technologies affect the duration of a universe cycle.

This is a most serious subject. We’ve heard hyperversals say (whether for purposes of eco-propaganda, or not) that overuse of gravitic technology can immediately deplete the vital condition of certain hyper-advanced kind.

On the one hand, we need to know more about the extent of such effects on the calculable long-term duration of both quanta and the larger universe/multiverse. On the other hand, hyper-advanced aliens appear to be dead serious about the subject - they appear to judge lesser populations in terms of their regard for the larger Δt/alt t ecology. Their concern has been mentioned over and over again. It frames larger conventions and much of the off-world policy of hyper-advanced populations, apparently.

When the most advanced aliens make so strong a case, when they suggest that such constraints tend to color their attitude toward any and all other aliens, inclusively, humans need to pay attention.

In a basic sense, advanced communities are obligated to cultivate a finer Δt/alt t conservation, to err on the side of caution, if necessary. So, humans should expect to hear more about Δt/alt t conservation. In some cases, we may feel frustrated by more advanced populations who may try to slow or tinker with human technological evolution, now that gravitic technology has fallen into the hands of a corrupt human sub-culture.

A rabbit-like breeding scenario, i.e. Verdants, appears to be the greatest off-world fear.

Then again, Verdant expansion tends to kill off certain planets and make non-sexuals of various others. So, in the end, although Verdants make heinous mistakes, some hyperversal hard-liners rationalize Verdant excess as having eliminated aggressive Δt and weapons violators. There has been abundant off-world chatter about the subject.

Some discussions of the sort are highly pitched and involve vast-scale controversies, questions of law and basic decency. These are major debates that affect us now. They should be discussed by human governments. Such issues loom highly in debates and analysis about how newly technological populations will evolve in a finite universe.

In order to counter Verdant-IFSP violations here (thinly-guised provocations, abusive use of technology against humans, and mass-murder/genocides sponsored by IFSP direct operatives), I’ve worked to remotely locate and notify possibly decent Verdant authorities who might be able to report back to better-minded Verdants.

I’ve notified Verdant females about criminal behaviors among some of their male counterparts.

Due to heavy-handed pressures in their bureaucracy (planet killers), few are expected to speak out. Imagine how it is: an entire planet could be ruined - what kind of minds would you be up against?

Meanwhile, non-sexuals in the IFSP seem to better understand that Verdant crimes can damage their external relations and deepen collective security counter-measures against them. Given some nonsexuals’ skepticism of Verdants’ ability to meet supercluster standards at present, some IFSP non-sexuals may opt for alternative channels or home planet groups that study Verdant behavior of the sort.

The main obstacle to correcting Verdants may be their psychotronic monitoring and communications network that allows them to track other IFSP aliens. As one Haven alien told Alec Newald, fear is used as a social control in the gray alignment, which tends to limit intellectual capacities rather than enhance them. The finer, deeper dimensions of interactive intelligence remain inaccessible to the worst offenders, which may be the ultimate irony in such cases.

To an astute nonsexual, that’s so obvious that it’s mathematically explicit, yet for a typical Verdant the career and resource needs of a population of 500 trillion living on 246,000 different planets may seem a greater factor.

So, is there recourse in such cases? In order to defend themselves, will humans (and aliens) have to tilt from one maddening rat race to another - further out in the cosmos? The answer to such questions should be obvious. By joining together in larger treaty organizations, a galaxy’s many populations can coordinate their interactions to limit weapons propagation and territorial disputes, both of which harm the larger ecology.

Better yet, collective security arrangements between galaxies can limit crimes by crude upstarts or colonizers like Verdants. A more advanced kind of interaction must limit weapons and planet grabs. It must reserve terra for evolving species and other scenarios.

The alt-cycle resonance of hyperspace allows for rigorous monitoring of the larger ecology, plus up-to-date reporting among participating populations.

It is my thesis and that of various aliens who’ve commented on the subject that larger, collective agreements are the basis for vastly more advanced supercluster and inter-cluster conventions. Long ago, the issue should have been settled when early crises were resolved through greater, shared interactions. By now, there should be abundant precedent.

When confronted with an offender’s intrusion, aliens tend to first monitor and then probe the offenders to determine their intentions and capabilities. This is normally a stealth assessment involving microgravitic uses of electrogravity and magnetogravity, fine-scale probing that may or may not be detectable. In such cases, the population with the larger and more effective spread of craft or installations in the vicinity tends to have an advantage.

However, the more honest and universally consistent population tends to be smarter and have a more enduring basis for such assessments.

They should also be open to greater, transparently standardized networking (hyperversals certainly are). After preliminary probing of an intruder, the defending population may use negative-cycle technology (and Δt) to temporarily disable an offending craft then warn it to leave the area. Should the offender persist, the crisis can escalate into a larger mobilization or appeals to the larger community for help in isolating the offender.

Meanwhile, way down at the level where humans find themselves, there are methods and awareness that help when alien offenders enter into the picture. Such methods are easily understood yet require familiarity with some of the uses and the “feel” of electrogravity resonance in hyperspace.

As numerous friendly aliens have stated over time, humans can compete with technologically more advanced aliens. Humans need not feel vulnerable to the point of submission.        

Back to Contents