30 -
A Hyper-advanced Problem Case
This can be frustrating: you know they’re doing it - they even resonate about it, yet at the moment you can’t recall a key aspect of what you were just thinking. The problem, of course, is that they may do this to themselves, essentially evacuating their own concerns and feelings about certain subjects (a smoothing over of contrary thoughts). They may think it more competitive, in a sense.
Imagine a
society that does so.
When we reply that Verdants clearly seek resources here, he tends to go quiet, as though he already did his thinking on the subject. An overseer often appears in conjunction with this “three ellipticals” hyperversal (or is made to seem to appear - their psychotronics can be used to project different facets, or slants on the same hyperversal) and both try to be conspicuous about their sense of rank, yet both betray a kind of insecurity in doing so.
The insecurity relates to
their fear that humans will seek other affiliations and will evolve
independently. Meanwhile, at one juncture in 2006, a seemingly more
open-minded hyperversal alien admitted that Verdants get resources
in exchange for their efforts, an incentive for their interventions.
But why?
All evidence suggests that they,
themselves, were once an expansive mega-population like Verdants. In
May of 2010, one hyperversal suggested that in the past the three
ellipticals hyperversals’ population was more than 1,000 trillion
individuals (one quadrillion), which he said “is not over-sized.” He
later said, “Don’t be surprised to see (a population of) 10
quadrillion” either in, or between, a large supercluster(s).
I pointed out the reported
500,000,000,000,000 Verdants, who are 3.3 times more numerous than
all other IFSP aliens, combined (a ratio that means there is no
effective vote in the IFSP because Verdants drown out all other
opinions).
Some of his population may be sexual in order to
preserve hardiness and genetic alternatives. However, given certain
propagandistic aspects of purported “three ellipticals” subculture,
it’s hard to imagine them admitting to what we might regard as
weakness.
At one such juncture in the summer of 2006, a hyperversal showed a graphic visual representation of the attending “three ellipticals” hyperversal in order to demonstrate a relationship with Verdants.
The “three ellipticals” hyperversal’s eye structure was like that of
Verdants, as was the general shape of his skullcase. He seemed to
have a slightly larger brain, in relation to his eyes, and some of
his other features are subtler than those of a Verdant. His physique
appeared to be slightly sturdier.
With this in mind, having heard that “less than .0X percent” of Andromeda (less than 1/10,000th) is IFSP, we have reason to think that the “three ellipticals’” project in question may be less significant than they pretend it to be. The three elliptical galaxies in question may end up being Centaurus A, N5102 (a small elliptical near Centaurus A that’s 1/5 the apparent size of the Andromeda galaxy), and perhaps another small elliptical or the future merged Milky Way-Andromeda elliptical-to-be.
Remember, the first graphic representation of a three ellipticals project (replete with images of hyperversal-hybrid aliens posed above the extended, opposing top and bottom central black hole vortices of three large galaxies) was intended to inform us about the social and ecological implications of merging galaxies.
There were conspicuously prototypical aspects to the graphic, as though we’re seen as a trainer case set against a more complex backdrop. A noted astronomer told me that the entire Virgo supercluster essentially centers on three large elliptical galaxies.
If, as was stated, his
population had a guiding genetic role in Verdant history, then there
are material and resource motives in his posture. His faction (or
what is posed as his faction) may be incapable of seeing beyond
them. Worse yet, there could be a literally animal devotion to
spreading their own genes via interventions, a kind of sociobiological scheme behind their destructiveness. Again we’re
reminded that they’re of animal origin and fallible.
On February 14, 2007 one or more hyperversal aliens suggested that planets that ignored such constraints have perished in this galaxy (perhaps by design). Meanwhile, Verdants take crude advantage of the weapons prohibition by using it as an excuse to trip their human operatives toward destructive, potentially planet-killing excess. However, Verdants gave exactly such technology to a human crime cabal. By tilting the human economy toward greed and secrecy via Rothschild, Du Pont and other reported cohorts, they frustrate resolution of human conflicts.
And how do such operatives affect the human economy? The French Rothschild is an owner of the Federal Reserve Bank, which prints all US money.
His grandparents and a Rockefeller
betrayed tradition established by Andrew Jackson, who dissolved the
Rothschild-influenced Second Bank of the United States, which
Jackson thought was a royalist threat to the nation’s future because
it had a monopoly on printing US money.
For example:
As a
result, in discussions between aliens, here, questions arise about
how surrounding populations can help to limit Verdant expansion.
So, please remember, judgments are made and
(infiltrated) planets die then refugees are scooped up and sometimes
used by an intervening population.
They seem to fear that independent, critical thinking by humans will lead to the conclusion that the “three ellipticals” faction and Verdants committed unnecessary crimes against humanity.
They drone on and on, trying to pre-empt moments when our native neighbors might express themselves in finer, more civilized terms. At times, for me, the “three ellipticals” section’s diversions and propaganda have been nightmarish.
Given the exploitative, sometimes destructive
nature of the Verdant empire, some humans are now discreetly
exploring preliminary relations with native neighbors rather than
the token IFSP enclaves hastily assembled by Verdants (IFSP enclaves
like “Pleiadians” who include Semitics and Nordics; gray variants;
Tall Whites and more).
It was either an attempt to divert high-minded
human thought, or it was just the opposite - an attempt to provoke
it.
Why not?
For two reasons.
Given their many advantages, hyperversals can take a variety of positions regarding Verdants, yet none are stated as their one, single policy.
The question is whether the “three ellipticals” profile represents their population’s mainstream. Like
any society, it probably features some very insular aliens, some of
whom lack critical thinking skills.
We know that their physics and their way of communicating and configuring their living centers models the universe as being more condensed and less flatly spacious than a typical human might imagine (hyperversals network more quickly than other aliens). However, hyperversals certainly don’t live without reference to our visible map of the universe.
They appear to have alt-cycled their
living centers, possibly even the sub-nuclear structure of entire
planets that they lived on, but they clearly live in a marginally
deeper, alt-cycled aspect of our same universe. However, for reasons
of pride and insular distinction, the “three ellipticals” faction
prefers to act as though they’re independent of nearly all that we
see.
Again, a counter-posed hyperversal said that one of the three ellipticals hyperversals left “his retirement garden” in Centaurus A, a clearly visible galaxy. In the end, evidence suggests that those same hyperversals steered or determined the pattern for the Verdant empire.
Questions remain about the “three ellipticals” sub-group.
Sometimes, hyper-advanced aliens’ quick shifts of mind in alt-cycled time have a dangerous consequence.
They don’t allow for the simple, unadorned passage of time. They don’t step back enough to see how a population like ours needs time to make changes. Instead, they manipulate and control as though they want their hands on all the levers. The error is the result of billions of years of an industrial approach to abduction and use of other aliens and humans, which harms the lives of many in the process.
By not allowing for the passage of time then adjustment, they can be harsh and failure-prone. It’s a mega-population’s dilemma. Another problem is the way that finely fluctuating interactions via faint and distant resonance can be so enthralling for some hyperversals that their own, inner complications and psychological distortions can seem to bounce back to them from outside, rather than exist within them.
When hyper-advanced aliens in different locations interact via
thought-amplifying psychotronic systems, they may, at times,
resonate only with minds like their own, minds that need help or
resensitization. However, they may be aware of that.
What we see then is a subdued form of
mob mentality, an ability to participate in crime and manipulated
mass harm rationalized in terms of structured, external agendas.
Under such circumstances, the dark, animal side of the psyche can be
expressed - even among fairly normal aliens. That’s complicated by
an alternately slowed, ethically frozen quality in offending alien
minds. In other words, even among hyper-advanced aliens, anonymity
breeds perversity and the abuse of power.
To be immersed in a constant stream of back-and-forth psychotronic stimuli results in a kind of state-dependent thinking. As a result, Verdants are likely to cling to, and depend on, their own psychotronic imagery and sensations, their own themes - which can include a subtle propagandistic flavor. So, it’s hard for them to sympathize with the thoughts of peoples who aren’t immersed in their culture of psychotronic communications.
For a Verdant to feel into a human mind can feel like falling flat without the larger, inflated stimulus and support realm of Verdant psychotronics. In other words, to Verdants there’s an unreal quality to those of us who exist outside of their psychotronic cocoon. As a result, it’s possible for such aliens to do great, apocalyptic harm to others without feeling much.
The fact
that we live brief lives compared to a Verdant could make us seem
that much more expendable to the hard-liners among them.
In the short space of 150-200 million years, the three ellipticals faction allowed Verdants to exceed normal population limits by a factor of some 5 to 10-fold.
That calls into question the “three ellipticals”’ ability to be responsible for the more turbulent yet urbane dynamics of deeper Virgo neighborhoods. Unlike our galaxy group, which contains only three large galaxies, Virgo contains 150. However, that’s a very finite number, so we can imagine news highlights about hyperversal relations across the entire Virgo supercluster.
Meanwhile, Centaurus A, the focus of the
“three ellipticals’” strategy, is smaller than many large elliptical
galaxies in Virgo. Another large elliptical, Maffei 1, is millions
of light years closer to us than Centaurus A. Compared to Virgo’s
large ellipticals, Centaurus A formed more slowly, and the next big
galaxy merger in its vicinity should occur billion years from now.
However, we’ve tested the attitudes and responses of some “three ellipticals” hyperversals who work with Verdants here. When they’re attentive and we mention IFSP operatives’ crimes against humanity, some “three ellipticals” hyperversals go cold. From their perspective, such doings are far removed from their living enclosures.
Although “three ellipticals”
hyperversals aren’t physically vulnerable to the epidemics,
manipulated violence, and sabotage that IFSP operatives do to
humankind, they can be psychological casualties, nonetheless.
But Verdants have studied non-sexuals’
logic and know that old hyperversals of the sort don’t
comprehend the nature of human casualties. Like Verdants, “three
ellipticals” hyper-versals took too far much and are blind to the
universal equivalency between populations. Verdants know how to take
crude, material advantage of that fact.
They rehearsed tasks
using psychotronic game technology, possibly using previously
recorded aspects of actual events in the exercises. The challenge
for them is to maintain extra shells of remove and not respond to
direct baiting. Meanwhile, the IFSP’s abduction and lab work is done
by subordinates, so for most “three ellipticals” hyperversals
there’s a distant quality to that, also.
They could, conceivably, fear transfer to places that, unlike Earth, are boring and peaceful. If cited for errors, they could face travel restrictions. So for some, the temptation is to simply contain human discussion about mass crimes in order to avoid possible career consequences. “Three ellipticals” offenders are reluctant to do anything substantive to thwart IFSP crimes, which raise a further question.
Are there better, more humane hyperversals in deeper, more dynamic sectors of Virgo - more creative, socially skilled hyperversals who are quick to challenge Verdant-like excess?
In the Virgo supercluster, there has to be diversity among hyperversals. There are greater, stronger challenges. Normally, in greater population centers there are finer, more cultured interactions. Amid the closer, more civilized conditions in Virgo, hyperversals must adapt to a more complex social environment. They have to think more creatively. They need to actually feel how other aliens feel there.
Out here, on Virgo’s
fringe, “three ellipticals” hyperversals could be more likely to
simply recite their objectives or pose diagrams, rather than admit
that mistakes have been made.
So, the natural response is to pretend that only IFSP subordinates or humans do such crimes. Meanwhile, the “three ellipticals” section has a direct role in IFSP doings, and the deflectory responses of “three ellipticals” test subjects suggest a semi-hypnotic stilling of thought and conscience. We’ve seen that pattern elsewhere. But there’s a further problem. Despite their dark-state of mind, “three ellipticals” test subjects are nonetheless excited by the danger and animal stimulation of certain situations. It’s a lower brain response to stimulus - with at least some possibly voyeuristic qualities.
It’s possible that in the back
of their minds, such hyperversals want to screw up because that will
force recently evolved aliens to take responsibility on a larger
scale, thus relieving old, tired hyperversals of a burden.
“Three ellipticals” hyperversals’ droning adherence to the Verdant scheme suggests that along this fringe of Virgo, the “three ellipticals” hyperversals may be much smaller than the Verdants, in number. In other words, “three ellipticals”’ dogmatic rigidity may be a sign of weakness because they can’t directly control the Verdant empire at this point because it’s too big, and Verdants know it.
So, rather than look weak and
compromised, it may be that “three ellipticals” hyperversals
essentially pose beside the IFSP in order to make humans and
Verdants think they’re on top of it all. Meanwhile, Verdants have
become a threat to the order and ecology in surrounding sectors, and
it may be that receding, “three ellipticals” hyperversals sometimes
counter-pose and help target populations see that for what it
is - out of frustration with Verdant arrogance.
Whether they’re regarded as failure-prone or not, the consequences of having allowed Verdants to become so extreme, so quickly, may be that the “three ellipticals” routine poses a threat to the consensus among Virgo’s hyperversals. If what is posed as the “three ellipticals” faction was, itself, once a Verdant-like problem case, Virgo’s hyperversals may worry that it will cause skepticism and animosity among trillions of recently evolved aliens, or that, for old grudge reasons it might seek divergent alliances for strategic purposes, rather than integrate into an effectively counter-balanced interaction between galaxy superclusters.
By failing to control Verdants, “three ellipticals” hyperversals could have isolated
themselves, perhaps assuring that other hyperversal sub-groups won’t
separately affiliate with them. In other words, there may be
tensions between hyperversals, also.
“Three ellipticals” hyperversal technology is so
advanced that they don’t need to be vastly numerous for security
reasons. So the question reduces to whether they’re still numerous
enough to directly control certain mega-populations of our time, or
whether they feel secure enough to simply guide such populations
more loosely.
|