AB: Okay. All right. I’ve got
it. Okay. Richard, then, the people who did it on Mars, and the
people who did it on Earth, both were unsuccessful. So--
DW: Well, maybe and maybe not. What if most of these
pyramids were built after something had already happened, and by
building them they actually stabilized things and got [the
Earth] back to working order a lot faster than otherwise would
have happened?
RH: That’s a viable idea. A very viable idea.
AB: A possibility, I suppose.
DW: But see, they learned about it too late … whereas we
know about it now.
RH: Or, they were prevented [from doing it earlier] by
all the nonsense and chicanery that’s going on now, where you
keep killing people off who try to introduce the way physics
really works. Remember [if the Physics of] a hundred years ago
[had never been politically diverted] Art, we wouldn’t be having
the same conversation; we would be surrounded by this technology
-- this Physics, this Knowledge … and there would be ample time
to do major, huge, important things to “even out the music” … so
the planet does not flip.
DW: You know, let me kick in one thing. Bush just asked for
24
billion dollars for us to continue fighting this war in Iraq.
Our rough guesstimate calculations are that for 150 million,
which is only a percentage of one billion, we could build a
worldwide network of these pyramids -- that would increase the
production of these oil wells, purify water for people who don’t
have sanitation right now, [and] do things such as reducing the
overall amount of earthquake activity.
AB: David, can you prove it on scale?
DW: Sure! The Russians have done it!
RH: The Russians already demonstrated it. Go to David’s website
-- I’m sure there’s a link there -- you can read the papers
yourself. In the mainstream Soviet literature, they did it.
They’ve been doing a lot of things that the West doesn’t “know
about.”
AB: I know. I know that’s true. And you’re saying the Russians
built pyramids over oil wells…
RH: Over old, defunct oil wells.
AB: Uh huh…
RH: And increased their production by twenty to thirty percent.
DW: Thirty percent! [The fuel crisis of the 1970s was due to a
7% worldwide shortage.]
AB: Through thinning the viscosity, right?
DW: Yeah. [The pyramids also reduced the amount of unwanted
material in the crude oil, such as gums, wax and pyrobitumen.]
AB: So that production increased, and they got just that much
more out of it.
RH: Yeah, one of the side effects is [that the pyramid
technology] changes molecular viscosities. There are umpteen
experiments in labs all over the world. I mean, if we were to go
and do the same thing for physics and chemistry that we’re
trying to do for planetary science in this [upcoming] three-part
[“Interplanetary”] paper-- we’d have the work for the next
decade cut out for us! It’s just, Art, that no one has assembled
this data into a coherent, different paradigm picture of what’s
really going on. We’re stuck with some very old ideas. And my
question -- and this is going to sound almost treasonous—is, are
we stuck with this through ignorance … or … because somebody
wants a lot of people to die!?
DW: Well, it’s worth thinking about.
AB: I suppose it is, I…
RH: You remember years ago, a book came out called
Alternative
3.
AB: Yes.
RH: And initially I dismissed it as pure bunk.
AB/DW: Yes.
RH: And I’m sure you did too. The closer we get to this date
[2012], and the more I learn and the more I see going on, and
the more the Physics comes together … and the predictive data --
you know, the dots all match up -- I’m wondering now if that
[Alternative 3] was the prescription for what a few “in the
know” are planning to do … while the rest of us basically, you
know, kiss our you-know-what goodbye?
DW: Well, I had somebody from black ops tell me that the
so-called astronaut named Grodin [in Alternative 3] was actually
an anagram for Gordon, and we’re not talking about the guy whose
first name is Gordon, we’re talking about an astronaut whose
last name was Gordon, and that a lot of that stuff [in the book,
and the BBC “documentary”] actually was true. What Alternative 3
said way back in the 70’s was that the whole solar system was
going to be heating up, and “Mars would become a more viable
place to live as a result.”
AB: Gentlemen, hold on. This is Alternative 3 for me! I’ve got
to break. We’ve got the news coming up. Certainly talking of
cosmic things this morning, aren’t we? What do you feel about it
as you listen to all these different people, of all these
different -- oh, what’s the right word -- all these different
persuasions:
remote viewers,
the Hopi, intuitives – people like Richard C. Hoagland and David? We’ll be right back.
(Commercial Break)
AB: Geologically, I have no problem whatsoever believing that
the magnitude of the changes that we’re discussing right now
have occurred in the past. We have evidence of that; we just
sort of put it up on the shelf and ignore it. But you really
can’t. It did happen. I think most of us in the pit of our
stomach know that it happened, and that it can happen again.
Once again my guests, Richard C. Hoagland, David Wilcock.
Gentlemen.
An email which I just happened to grab very quickly:
“The
program tonight seems to indicate that the size of the pyramid
has the ability to focus the energy from the cosmos. If the
fluid parameters of oil have changed, as demonstrated by what
you said in Russia, imagine what would happen if the surface
tension of biochemical reactions were changed? All reactions in
our body require this surface tension, or contact with
molecules, to cause biochemical reactions.”
Jerry from Vista,
California.
So, comments?
RH: David?
DW: Well, the pyramid power that we’re talking about goes well
beyond simply technical things. When you start getting into
biology science, it gets even more bizarre and interesting. Let
me give you a couple examples which are really fascinating.
The first one was done by the Ivanovskii R&D Institute of
Virology within the Russian Academy of Medical Science. Now,
this is mainstream stuff. You gotta remember the Soviet Union,
prior to 1991, was toe-to-toe with the US [technically].
AB: Sure.
DW: But then, when they collapsed, you have these scientists who
are literally living on 30 dollars a month, who have the time
and the incentive to do this pyramid research. So anyways,
Klimenko and Nosik from this Ivanovskii R&D Institute [studied]
a drug called venoglobulin --which is a naturally occurring
compound in a human being’s blood that fights viruses. When they
diluted this drug down to 50 micrograms per milliliter, and
stored it in the pyramid for a short time, it became
three
hundred percent more effective at killing viruses.
Another one which I find really fascinating came from the R&D
Institute of Pediatrics, Obstetrics, and Gynecology, headed by
A.G. Antonov. They took a solution of 40% glucose in distilled
water and put it in the pyramid, and all they gave was one
milliliter of this glucose to 20 different premature babies with
compromised immune systems. The babies that were given this
formula had their health increased to rapidly practical and
normal levels, whereas the control group had no real change.
AB: God, these are incredible things you’re saying. So if these
things are true, then why wouldn’t science in the West say, “Oh
my God,” and “Let’s see if we can duplicate that experiment”?
RH: Well?--
DW: Money.
RH: --given that we’ve had fifteen years of “non-progress” in
the so-called cold fusion area -- where we have a stunning
experiment, with eminently world-class reputable scientists in
Utah, with an astonishing support from the Congress (because I
know Robert Roe enacted legislation to try to move to help them
almost immediately).
How do I know this? Because I had a meeting with him on the
Mars
question [in 1989 – right after the Pons and Fleischman
announcement]. He was the head of the House Science Committee. I
had a meeting on Cydonia, and one of the things we discussed
back then, in 1989, was cold fusion and how he was moving to get
the [Science] Committee to help. Do you know what happened to
Robert Roe? He was first drummed out of his House Chairmanship,
he then was drummed out of the House itself … and [then] he …
sideswiped and almost killed a woman and her little girl one
dark night, because he was basically an alcoholic. He fell from
the supreme science position in the US Congress … to a drunk --
because “something” intervened in his career, and what he wanted
to do to help Pons and Fleischman, and to help me with
Cydonia,
redounded to his profound detriment.
You want to know why this stuff is not mainstream? There is a
control mechanism. There is censorship. It is as
Gene Mallove
said, in his last editorial,
“It is the evil … the invisible
evil of science and politics, in the 21st century…”
AB: Why would the West, and modern science in the West, want to
suppress something that could save all of humanity?
RH: How is science funded?
AB: By government…
RH: And where does government get its money?
AB: From us.
RH: It picks our pockets, right?
AB: Yeah.
RH: It decides what [are the] priorities, it decides what’s
“nonsense” and “pseudo-science.” In order for a scientist to
maintain a living, to put his kids through school, to pay for
his car, to keep a roof over his head, he has to get grants. If
the only trust you get a grant from is from agencies that tell
you "what is acceptable and not acceptable,” you quickly learn
to fall in line with what’s “acceptable.” Gene said, in our last
conversation--
AB: But that’s not answering my question … that’s the business
end of what you consider to be a conspiracy. My question was--
RH: But without “business” you have no “science” … anymore.
AB: But my question was, Richard, really, if we understood it to
be of this magnitude, why would we be suppressing something--
RH: Who is “we,” Kemosabe?
AB: Well, whatever group you imagine to be doing this, would
stop--
RH: How about the National Science Foundation? How about
Science
magazine? How about Nature?
AB: How about ‘em?
RH: They have what’s called -- Gene used to call it -- “sneer
review” … where you basically can be attacked [anonymously, by
other “scientists”]. In fact, let me get a specific--
AB: But my overall question is not being answered. Why would we
want to block a technology?
RH: But we don’t! “We” are not in charge!
AB: I’m not, I don’t mean you, Richard, and you David. I mean us
collectively.
RH: No. “We” -- the collective body of “Americans,” or, the
collective body of the citizens of Italy or France or Germany --
we’re not in charge! “Somebody else” is, and they dictate our
reality, they dictate the rules, they dictate the funding -- and
those who do not go along pay awful prices … up to, and maybe
including, the “ultimate price.”
AB: But if, “they,” in quotes -- whoever in the hell “they” are
-- understood the magnitude of what’s going to occur around
2012--
RH: Who says “they” intend to be here when it “hits the fan?”
That’s back to the
Alternative 3 model.
DW: And you’re also dealing with religious beliefs.
AB: Where do you think they plan to be?
RH: Okay, remember when I came to Nevada and I showed you some
things, and I sent you a piece of video and I asked you sit on
it for a year. The STS-80 video.
AB: I recall extremely well, yes.
RH: And you saw --and then ultimately Whitley wound up putting
it on NBC-- what looked to be like extraordinary spaceships
cavorting around in Earth orbit, that are light years beyond the
shuttle?
AB: Yes.
RH: And my [political] model is that they aren’t “aliens,”
they
aren’t ET’s ... they are ours. They’re part of a secret,
black-budget program that had been going on ever since 1947
when, according to your friend, a certain Phillip Corso, we
back-engineered a stunning hyper-dimensional propulsion and
energy technology … and have quietly put it to use in the
military, in a black-ops program. And I believe they intend,
whoever these “they” are, to take a bunch of their cronies and
friends, and when the going gets tough … they will get going --
Probably to Mars.
Now, back during the heyday when Hubble was broken. Remember
Hubble being broken?--
AB: Yes.
RH: --it couldn’t take a decent picture, if its life depended on
it -- I’m walking through the airport in O’Hare, in Chicago, one
afternoon, and I happen to see on the newsstand this
extraordinary color cover image of Life magazine. And it’s a
picture of Mars -- in full color -- taken by the “broken”
Hubble
telescope. At that point, because I was kind of close to
Hubble
(remember the school project I had in Washington, where we had
the Hubble guys coming in and talking to the kids?), I knew a
lot about what was going on [with Hubble]. I said to myself,
“Why in the world, in the middle of their ‘crisis,’ are they
taking pictures of Mars with this damn broken telescope?”
The title of that Life cover was, “Our Next Home.”
I wonder who that cover was directed to …?
AB: I don’t know. To imagine with you, Richard, all of this is
to imagine that somebody’s making a pretty poor bet, if their
bet is “to hell with Earth, we’re gonna let it go through a
cyclical change …” without trying to harness whatever powers
your suggesting to me can change it – the pyramids – and we’re gonna go racing off to
Mars where we’re gonna have a jolly old
time while everybody else on Earth dies.
I mean, just, it just doesn’t make sense to me that that would
be a plan of anybody. I mean it’s not such a good bet, Richard,
right now, going to Mars and abandoning a dying
Earth.
RH: I’m not quite sure what your problem is. That, they wouldn’t
have the audacity to do it? They wouldn’t have the technology?
They wouldn’t have the money? They wouldn’t have the secrecy?
They wouldn’t have the instinct? They wouldn’t have the
motivation? Where’s the problem in the model, in the theory?
AB: Well, Mars doesn’t look like a warm Caribbean island,
Richard. It doesn’t look—
RH: But -- if it’s the only place you can go and not get blown
to smithereens … because the planet’s gonna tip over … it’s kind
of, you know … remember the old joke, about “where does an 800
pound gorilla sleep?”
AB/RH: Anywhere it wants to.
RH: We have people living tonight at the bottom of the world --
in frigid, absolutely minus-120-degree-below temperatures, and
howling 60 to 80-mile-an-hour gale winds --right?
AB: Yes we do.
RH: And we used to have them powered by nuclear power, before
the environmentalists chucked the nukes out of
McMurdo. So we’re
trucking in lots and lots of oil [now] to keep the gas burners
going and the generators going, and in that bubble down there,
that geodesic dome (courtesy of Bucky Fuller), we have men and
women --and you and I have discussed very strange things going
on at the bottom of the world, have we not?--
AB: We have.
RH: --that have lived in “a little bubble of technology and
light” -- in the middle of such desolation and such privation
and cold, that you could not survive outside ten minutes --
unprotected -- right?
AB: Yes.
RH: Mars is far more benign than the
Antarctic.
AB: It’s still not a cakewalk.
RH: But with proper technology, and all the money they can “pick
from your pocket and mine” -- that no one ever is tracking -- a
few, a thousand … ten thousand … a hundred thousand … whatever
number you think is “the few” -- could keep the human race alive
… when the rest of it goes to “heck in a hand basket!”
AB: Why let that happen, Richard?
RH: Because, they may not know they can do anything different!
Remember what my old Intel friend used to say, and says to me
again and again when he talks to me. He says, “The lie is
different … at every level.”
DW: Yep.
RH: If you look at some of the things that are written about
these catastrophes, by those that are most “in the know,” they
themselves think it is unstoppable. It’s like, you know, I used
to have a girlfriend and she was into astrology, and one day she
looked at me and she said, “I can’t fight the planets. They’re
bigger than I am!”
And I’m looking this problem in that vein … that we have been
taught that you “can’t fight Mother Nature.” The best that you
can [do is to] kind of “come to a truce,” maybe a stand-off -- a
Mexican stand-off – but you can’t really intervene, and you
can’t really change your fate if your planet decides to throw
what it’s going to throw against you. Isn’t that the basic story
of “The Global Superstorm?”
AB: Yes, well--
RH: That, you get the hell out of the way … you can’t do
anything about it!
AB: Yes well, the archeological side of it, I’m afraid is on the
side of this occurring.
RH: But it doesn’t say that you have to keep repeating the “sins
of the Fathers.” Maybe we can be smarter this time around. Maybe
we can get enough people to take us seriously. And the cool
part, Art, the part that David and I are in 100-percent
agreement on, is that we don’t have to invent anything. Because
we know, from data that’s leaked out in a variety of ways, and
that piece of [NASA] video that I gave to you, we know the
black-ops boys have all the necessary technology to at least
begin to tackle the problem -- if they are of a mind to.
It’s up to us to make them “of a mind to.”
AB: David, do you agree with all of that, for the most part? Or
if you disagree, where?
DW: I see that, for example, you probably heard about this
Area
51 scientist
Dr Dan Burisch.
AB: Yes, but I followed that trail, David, and I’m not at all
satisfied--
RH: Neither am I.
AB: --with the genuine aspect of that … (all three crosstalk
simultaneously, inaudible)
DW: You’ve got to hear where I was going, though.
AB: I’d love to hear where you are going, and will in a second.
I’m just telling you that I interviewed some people who were
supposedly in communication with this man. And I did not find
reliable or test-worthy any of what was said to me. Having said
that, and I really wanted to say it, go ahead and say what you
were going to say.
DW: Well, I just wanted to point that if anything of what he
said was true, an article I wrote [The Matrix is a Reality] was one of only about two
website links that he used in his summaries. So that was a big
event for me, because I realized that if this guy is for real,
then the stuff that Richard and I are working on is cutting edge
even for them. So the intel that you and the audience are
hearing tonight is as hot, as cutting edge, as fresh as if you
were in Area 51, sitting in a small little briefing room and
having access to this compartmentalized information.
They don’t know that “the Physics” can make a difference! The
Alternative 3 -- the “three alternatives” -- are ridiculous.
We’re talking about [“alternatives”] like “blowing holes in the
atmosphere, to let the heat out.” All you have to do, in order
to understand how this Physics works, is basically get down to
what’s really happening at the quantum level, how is matter
created. Gravity--
AB: We’re out here really dancing on the edge, in my opinion.
RH: Wait, wait, wait. According to Gene Mallove, in that last
conversation (and again, I’m thinking about how incredibly
prescient the things he said [were] and the things I said in
that last conversation), where Gene was, when he died, is that
current physics -- including quantum mechanics, relativity,
zero-point, all of it -- is garbage.
DW: Yep.
RH: It’s bunk. Complete garbage, Art. And what replaces it is
something akin to what David and I have been talking about
tonight, and this was from Mallove himself. The proof of this is
in the experiments conducted by reputable, exquisitely
genius-level people who have actual equipment and technology
that is available to be seen on videos, or in person, and
certainly funded for development -- and they can not get a dime
of funding. In fact, his entreatment to me in our conversation
was, “Dick, if you know of anybody who has an extra ten or
twenty thousand dollars to put into our non-profit foundation,
so we can fund some of these critical experiments and keep these
people alive, please let them know.” And I said to him, and this
is incredibly ironic, I said, “Gene you need to come back on
‘Coast’ and tell the Country what you’ve got in that drawer,”
and he said, “I would love to.”
DW: I saw the film [of the kind of devices in that drawer in
action.]
RH: And, two days later … he can’t do it.
AB: But it is important that we… I don’t know, I felt when we
started down the Burisch trail. Richard, you’ve looked into…
RH: No, I have looked at Burisch and I think it is complete
disinformation.
AB: I do too.
RH: I think it is complete nonsense. It is more noise. It’s like
when you get to the end part of this game, Art.
AB: Well, if you don’t separate the noise, Richard--
RH: You gotta separate it.
AB: --from the signal, then you’re not going anywhere.
RH: That’s right. And you gotta be very fine tuned, and know
when your BS detector is really being tickled. The Burisch
thing, to me, it reeks of disinformation.
AB: Okay, we agree on that.
DW: Yeah, I don’t disagree either. [I believe that Burisch is
telling the truth as it has been shown to him, but that he is
not fully receiving the truth – including the data from the
alleged ETs themselves.]
RH: Apart from that, apart from that the fact that Mallove has
stood behind in public some stunning technologies … technologies
that go back to the work of Wilhelm Reich. Now, that’s a name
you should remember, Art.
AB: Yes, of course.
RH: Wilhelm Reich was a medical doctor, and he got into
something called Orgone energy, which was never really
understood. He tried to get Einstein to take it seriously, and
there was some conversation there and Einstein did not really
duplicate a key experiment. So ultimately, he passed, but the
fact is that the people that Gene has worked with, in the lab
that he set up, have done stunning confirmations of almost
everything that Wilhelm Reich wrote about. And you know what
happened to Reich in the 1940’s? They ultimately arrested him--
DW: Yeah, he died broken-hearted.
RH: --locked him in prison, and killed him.
AB: And of course,
Tesla.
RH: Then we go back to Tesla.
AB: Tesla has to mix into all of this.
RH: It’s like the old joke about the guys, you know, all the
blind guys handling the elephant: one’s got the trunk, one’s got
the leg, one’s got the tail. We’re all talking about the same
stuff. It just has different names. And the stuff that Gene was
talking about as the ultimate Creator of reality, which goes
from beagles to begonias, in other words consciousness and life
and biology and human beings and the spark of the soul that
makes us alive and aware and questioning, as well as the sun and
the Galaxy and Andromeda and anything out there… It’s all part
of the same stuff. It is this invisible, massless aether, with
which Gene fundamentally can create anything under the right
conditions. [You] can reform reality in any form you want, under
the right conditions, and that in turn is modulated by the
transfer between higher dimensions and this 3-D reality.
AB: All right, gentlemen, hold tight. Richard C. Hoagland,
David Wilcock and truly a galaxy-like discussion. It comes again and
again and again. I wonder if this next time we’ll be able
anything at-all about it.
(Commercial Break)
AB: Of this morning’s show, I tell you, I buy the cyclical event
part with regard to Earth. There’s plenty of evidence to back
that up. It has happened, it will happen again. I might even buy
where the energy comes from to achieve this change. The
hyperdimensional physics aspect of it. I think when you look at
the
19.5 evidence, there’s plenty of support for it there. So I
buy almost all of that. In fact, once again, plug for (laughs)
the movie, The Day After Tomorrow, that’s where the energy would
come from. So I can buy all of that, I can even understand it,
but what I can’t grasp, what I just cannot grasp, is that a
group of humans would covertly, understanding that this was
coming, whether they thought they could do something about it or
not, virtually build something to save their butts, go to Mars
and let Earth and all its inhabitants perish. And that being
some great secret plan to save a few butts while all of ours
roast. That part, I just can’t digest.
(Commercial Break)
AB: Once again, Richard C. Hoagland, David Wilcock. Gentlemen,
welcome back.
So I can buy a lot of this. As I said, the cyclical part seems
real and supportable. Even the hyperdimensional energy,
certainly the energy is real and probably supportable and may be tappable. But then to extend out to where you’ve got this
secret
group of people who are realizing that this catastrophic event
is coming to Earth and they’re going to escape in their
spaceships to Mars or something, leaving us to our awful--
RH: Well fortunately, the Model doesn’t depend on the
politics.
Whether there are people that know or don’t know is completely
irrelevant to what we’re figuring out.
AB: What I can believe, Richard, is that people have certain
financial interests, like oil and the world economy such as it
is--
RH: Yeah, remember, the lie is different at every level.
AB: That … that’s--
RH: And for those people that’s their universe, and
they will
hang on to the last drop. You know, four dollars a gallon? How
about 40 dollars a gallon? Now, that’s the box we’re in. How do
we get out? We’ve got two problems – a short-term problem and a
long-term problem.
The short-term problem is keeping the
civilization alive that we want to live in, and the long-term
problem is keeping the planet alive that we want to live on. And
the data that David and I have put together, and we’re posting
on the web… I think, David, we’re going to have to have more
than three parts to this--
AB: Well--
DW: Yeah, it sounds like it.
AB: You know, David, if what you said about the experiments in
Russia is accurate, then the way to do it is to, I don’t know,
in some manner force this information to be more public to the
degree that the larger institutions have no choice but to
attempt to begin to duplicate it and break this out!
DW: The good part is that there are a lot of honest guys in the
government. I was there at the May 10th
Disclosure Project
event
in 2001, which kind of got blown away by 911, but nonetheless I
was in that room with the Closed Executive Summary Briefing for
members of Congress. I watched these guys giving standing
ovations when hearing from Sgt. Clifford Stone some of the most
wildly esoteric UFO data you could imagine. So there’s a lot of
people out there who are in positions of power where they can
make a difference, and they honestly don’t know about this
stuff, because it’s not part of the regular, legitimate
government.
RH: This is why I am planning, in the briefing that I am going
to do on the Hill, to bring some of these technologies and if
necessary some of the scientists to Washington to stand there
with me. And Gene was going to be one of my prime witnesses.
Well, there are a lot of others. Gene was a conduit, Gene was a
nexus point, but Gene fortunately was not one-of-a-kind.
AB: Well, Gene is obviously no longer with us. That’s the
horrible news of the night, folks. So you … there’s a device--
RH: Knowing his integrity, I mean, I will send to you, because
you obviously have been looking at this and wanting a real set
of stuff to appear for a long time…
AB: Oh yes.
RH: I will send you what he sent to me, which is his
first-person technical and philosophical testimony of what he
observed, the experiments, how it works, the technology,
demonstrated in front of him.
AB: Do you have enough information, Richard, to be led back to
this, to get this device in question?
RH: I know who the people are! I’ve talked with them!
AB: OK. Can you make your way to this device?
RH: Well, I can probably… I mean, I can call them. But maybe I
shouldn’t call them. Maybe I should physically go there, because
the last person I called, very nasty things happened to. So I
may have to be a little smarter about it this time. But yes, I
know who they are and I know what they have done and I know the
foundations it will rock if I can demonstrate to these people in
Washington, these honest people, which I totally agree with
David, that regardless of whether there is a cabal or not,
99.99% of the system, Art, is completely ignorant of anything.
AB: All right, David, you wanted to say something.
DW: Yeah. I’ve seen the film of the device that everybody is so
hot for. When
Dr. Greer is talking about
SEAS Power, S-E-A-S,
Space Energy Access Systems…
RH: Uh huh.
AB: Oh yes! He’s been hot on it for a while now.
DW: It’s probably the same one that Dr. Eugene Mallove was
talking about.
RH: No, it’s not. This one works.
DW: Well, that’s the thing. I just wanted to say that I saw a
film of a guy--
RH: And this is not just a device, it is a physics … of a
multiple series of devices … including, Art, one that produces
anti-gravitational effects.
DW: Right.
AB: Are you two talking about the same device?
RH: No. No, we’re not.
DW: Just let me get this out. The one that I saw was a half a
sphere [made of metal and mounted on a 1-foot-wide wooden
board], and it had an outlet – a regular, ordinary, 120 volt AC
outlet [mounted on the board as well]. And this guy was able to
start his car with it, and he was able to power a lamp and do
anything that you’d normally do with a regular outlet. Now the
thing is--
RH: It’s not the same. It’s not the same.
DW: Okay. There are no moving parts inside.
[The device works
simply by constructing a nested series of geometric forms
(Platonic Solids), in metal, that are in precise harmonic
relationships to each other. This was based on the pioneering
19th century research of John Keely. The current is drawn
between the outer rim of the half-sphere and the exact center of
the nested geometry. He was able to tune it to run at a standard
household alternating current 120-volt level. The only problem
that he had was that when you first plugged in the lamp, it
would get brighter than normal, so there is an initial surge of
extra current at the beginning. However, if you were charging up
batteries with it and using them, this would obviously not be a
problem.]
[The whole thing was no larger than a telephone book with an
upside-down salad bowl on top of it. One or two such devices,
passively and continuously charging a leftover telephone switch
station battery (roughly 1500-2500 dollars), would probably be
enough to power someone’s home for as long as the battery
lasted. Since it runs entirely on geometry, this particular
design gives heavy support to the reality of what we are
discussing in the Hyperdimensional Model, as the geometry we see
in the planets is the same geometry that powers this device.
Once the exact ratios between the geometries are known it would
be dirt simple and dirt cheap to mass-produce these devices; but
obviously the inventor fears for his life and knows the stakes.]
RH: The one I’m thinking of is a motor, Art, and get this – the
motor is not connected to anything. It just sits in empty space
and it spins, and when you touch it, as a human being, it spins
faster.
DW: Yep.
RH: Because the physics of life -- remember the old Victorian
idea of the vital force, the life force?
AB: Yes…
RH: That’s why biology on this planet appeared at a certain
time, half a billion years ago, after certain things happened on
the Earth that did not happen in the three and a half billion
years before. It is because biology and consciousness are part
of this Physics.
Which brings me to something very important. You have conducted
yourself, my friend, seven, count the number -- tetrahedral
“seven” -- fundamental consciousness experiments.
AB: Yes.
DW: The Great Experiment.
RH: And one of those saved my life.
DW: Yep.
RH: As we recounted the other night with George-- when
Robin was
on as a guest -- without that intrusion into my situation … I
did not know at the time, and nobody has known, so we’re going
to tell your audience tonight … the doctors had, in essence,
written me off! They basically told her “that I was toast.” They
didn’t tell me, but they told her. SO she moved heaven and earth
-- with all the supplements and all the other things -- and did
her part of this miracle. But the other part, Art -- that I
really cannot discount, because I could feel it -- was an
actual, palpable change in how I felt. And believe me, when
you’re dying, you’re very sensitive to how you feel.
DW: (Laughs)
AB: Yeah. The other subjects of these Experiments said these
exact same words.
RH: Okay. When you focus the consciousness of -- I don’t know
how many millions of people who are listening to us tonight,
unbelieving of many of the things we’ve been saying -- when you
focused all those people on me, to get well, it changed.
Something changed. In fact, it changed so dramatically that some
of my enemies put things on websites … remember that (suggesting
that I had hoaxed the whole thing)!!?
AB: If, Richard (laughing:) yes.
RH: Remember that?
AB: Richard, I know…
RH: Now, here’s where it gets important. Now, let me finish.
Please let me finish.
AB: I know it works … I’m going to let you finish. I know it
works.
RH: Okay. So if it works, and we’re dealing with a “ruffled
physics,” an out of tune [Physics], a dissonance -- think of
those fingernails on the blackboard – everybody … that awful
sound you used to hear in school, that would make your teeth
crawl, or you want to jump up out of your seat?
AB: Yeah.
RH: Think of that, and magnify it by a hundred billion times …
and that’s what the world “feels” … and it tips over.
But the antidote is maybe not just technology, maybe not
gadgets, maybe not machines, maybe not what Gene was looking at,
but what Art Bell has been doing, which is to focus people’s
energies, their concentration, on smoothing out the rough edges
and moving us through this perilous time in a coherent, musical
coherent fashion. A harmonious transition as opposed to a
discordant transition. It could be as simple, Art, as getting
this audience to focus on a future they really want to happen --
not the one they are afraid will happen.
DW: I’m real glad to hear Richard Hoagland say that. I am in
complete agreement.
RH: Because there is a unity between the Physics and
consciousness … and life! That’s what the bottom line of this
research has proven now, to my satisfaction.
DW: Well, I’m glad you’re satisfied, because I have been saying
that for a long time … I wanted to check out one more pyramid
thing, because it totally ties in with what you just said. This
one came from the Russian National Academy of Science. They just
took ordinary salt and pepper and stuck it inside the pyramid.
They then removed it and fed it surreptitiously to about five
thousand people in certain selected jails in Russia.
AB: Mm hm.
DW: Amazingly, within a few months there was a dramatic
improvement in the behavior of the guys in the jails. Most of
the criminal behavior almost completely disappeared, alcoholism
[began to disappear,] whereas in the control jails there was no
sign of any behavioral change. Nothing in the jails under this
study had changed, except that the salt and pepper from the
pyramids was being secretly added to their food.
So if the energy of the pyramid harnesses and focalizes this
energy of consciousness, if the pyramid structure has sort of a
funnel-like effect for this fluidlike energy … and can
concentrate it …
AB: Yes.
DW: And if consciousness can move the energy the same way, then
what if each person is sort of like a little portable Stargate,
and the reason why we’re having so much trouble has to do with
people’s inability to be honest with themselves, honest with
each other. Then, their own internal shadow side gets projected
out into the collective, so you get the shadow of each person
being acted out in these occult politics. And when we get right
with ourselves inside, the whole hologram changes. So, I do have
a portion of my work that focuses extensively on what we can do,
just in terms of getting to know ourselves better, and basically
just being nice to people. And the difference that that can
really make.
Meditating for world peace can decrease the crime in a given
city by 76%. That was the Maharishi Effect.
RH: Art, the numbers are there. The studies are there. Yes.
DW: It’s true.
RH: Now, remember Bob’s fast blast a few hours ago? Where he
asked, “is the problem in ourselves and not the Universe?”
AB: Yes.
RH: The answer is yes. We are part of the “broken physics” -- of
this system. The difference is that the planet cannot change
itself, because it is not conscious. We are conscious. We can
control this dynamic, and you and I have lived through these
experiments. Remember our Princeton colleagues, and their little
eggs. Right?
AB: Clearly.
RH: We know that if you harness the combined good, positive
energies of enough people, miracles … what anybody else would
define as a miracle … can happen. I am literally tonight talking
to you, Art, because I am living proof of your faith and
confidence in people to make a difference. In my life.
DW: Absolutely.
AB: Well, I’ve seen this power work, so I know it works. I’m
pretty well beyond that. I have no greater understanding of this
power, and the possible consequences of its use, than I had
then. I don’t understand it, and so I’m very hesitant to toy
with what I don’t understand. Once I realized [spoken in low,
galloping, somewhat goofy voice:] “Oh gosh, you know, this
really is a power, this really does work,” once that hit me like
a brick, then it slowed me down. I began to tell myself that I
don’t understand what I’m doing.
DW: Yeah.
AB: I don’t know what I’m doing. And there is a law of
unintended consequences. There is also a time, I suppose, when
things are so serious that you don’t have much to lose.
RH: You got it. When the cliff is behind you, and “the Thing” is
in front of you, and you’ve got to make the decision--
AB: Yes. Yes. Yes.
RH: But you have now demonstrated, seven times, that this, in a
proper moral atmosphere, can produce important miracles. And
you’ve intervened in people’s lives, my friend. You intervened
in my life. And I believe, firmly, that I am here tonight, in
part, because of what you were able to get this collective
consciousness, of all those people out there, to focus on, which
is to keep me around … so I can be a thorn in your side for a
few more years.
AB: (casually delighted:) Hah, ha, ha.
DW: Now, if we get the disclosure of this technology, it can’t
but only add to the way that people are going to open up and
change. And that will change the Physics. So it’s like you teach
people the physics, and the Physics … changes.
RH: See, this is one reason I think why certain of these
discoveries are suppressed. Not so much because of the technical
or technological aspects of what they will make possible. But
because of the incredible liberating effects on consciousness.
DW: Correct.
RH: We are our own worst enemies. We have trapped ourselves
within this prison. And all we see played out on CNN are the
endless tape loops of horror, and destruction, and degradation,
and perdition, and every possible vile thing you can imagine,
ramped up to a crescendo where people either turn off or tune
out … or go crazy.
DW: If it bleeds, it leads.
AB: (Disappointed-sounding:) I know.
RH: So the antidote is to provide people with Hope, with a
capital H. And there’s something that’s going to happen in our
arena this summer, and Linda Moulton Howe, God bless her, is the
first person to give us real information and intelligence on
this. She interviewed one of the senior scientists on the Mars
Express mission. And Whitley was talking to you the other night
about this, remember?
AB: Oh, yes!
RH: She said that, and I went to her website, and I am going to
link to a story that we are doing on this after David and I have
finished this program tonight. She interviewed this guy who was
the chief scientist on the
spectrometer on the Mars Express
spacecraft. He came within a whisker, within a hair’s breadth,
of admitting that he has found “benzene, formaldehyde and other
organic molecules” produced only by life, because they disappear
in the Mars atmosphere in hours, unless they are replaced. And
he plans to announce his firm findings, either in July, across,
by the way, David, the canonical July 20th date--
DW: Uh huh…
RH: The COSPAR meeting, the sacred Egyptian ritual date of July
20th--
DW: You got it.
RH: Or – [at] the September meeting, later in the fall, just
before the [US] election. What he’s going to announce is that
these molecules have been found, they have been confirmed, and
they prove conclusively -- because they can’t be there otherwise
-- that there is current life on Mars.
Art, when that happens, and this is what I was telling Gene, and
we had such joy sharing our positive outcomes now that we have
gone through the vineyards and labored for so long to see light
at the end of this tunnel--
AB: Mm hm.
RH: I said,
“Gene, when that happens…”
“You don’t have to tell
me, Dick,” he said, “All kinds of other paradigms will come
marching through that door, and things people thought were
impossible, outrageous, nonsense, bunk, pseudo-science, will
suddenly have to be taken seriously, and the media will become
our friend, because they will be avidly following up on the
stories of all the other discoveries that nobody thought were
true, but turn out to be true. And that, by the way, is the
title of my talk on Capitol Hill. “Life on Mars … and Other
Fantasies that are Real.”
AB: Well, that should get their attention! Uh,
David?
DW: This is part of the fulfillment of the prophecies. There are
all these prophecies that talk about the kind of conditions that
we are going through right now…
AB: There are!
DW: And they describe a massive change in the whole way in which
society functions, and how people think about themselves.
AB: They do!
RH: See, I’m a great believer in free will. And I’ve gotten a
lot of metaphysical stuff under my belt in the last twenty years
of doing this and pursuing this. And I really believe, David,
that if we were doomed, if we were condemned to do what the
previous generations were condemned to … we wouldn’t be given
these choices.
DW: Yeah! Why would there be a prophecy? What’s the point?
RH: But the opposition is fighting so hard to keep us from
figuring it out – because, if we figure it out, and we get enough
people to join us, we can make a difference. And that was what
Gene died believing.
DW: What I’m hoping is that by a strict political expediency,
the number of people who know about this becomes too great, so
that even if somebody does want to suppress it, they basically
can’t in order to save face. That’s what needs to happen. And
the way we’re going to do that is by getting the people who can
get the message out to the people aware of how simple this is,
aware that the whole, entire solar system is changing in very
obvious ways. If this movie, The Day After Tomorrow, can help
kick-start that whole thing and get people talking about this
stuff, they can segue right into what we’re doing right now. All
NASA scientists, all mainstream. Nothing fringe ....
Straight-ahead science that says the solar system is changing,
and that we need to learn about the Physics to figure out what
we can do to get through this more smoothly.
AB: Well, I think that’s the biggest thing you’ve said tonight –
to document the changes going on all around us. That should have
meaning. Richard, as always, thank you very much!
RH: Thank you, Art. I have one little surprise for you.
AB: Very quickly!
RH: FOX has invited Robin and me to be with you at
the Premiere.
DW: All right.
AB: (Delighted:) Ha ha ha ha ha!
RH: We will see you in New York, my friend!
DW: Congratulations.
AB: All right. Congratulations, Richard. See you in New York.
RH: Good night, David.
DW: Good night, Richard. Good night, Art. Good night, everybody!
AB: Good night. Richard C. Hoagland, David Wilcock, and there
you have it. Well, everybody, see you tomorrow night. And
tomorrow night, another advocate of multiple dimensions, the
incredible Dr. Michio Kaku. For me, and for all those who help
bring this program to you, from the high desert, good night,
all.
