| 
			  
			  
			
			
  
			
			by Yana Kunichoff30 December 2010
 from 
			TruthOut Website
 
 
			  
			 
			The "Family" - Who 
			Really Is Behind This Secret Organization?(Image: Hachette Book Group)
 
 
			  
			  
			What if someone were to tell you that 
			your Congressman routinely bandies around phrases such as "Jesus 
			plus nothing," used to mean the complete rule of Jesus, and compares 
			the desired reach to that of Hitler or Ho Chi Minh? 
			  
			If this makes you at all apprehensive, 
			then Jeff Sharlet's "C 
			Street - The Fundamentalist Threat to American Democracy" 
			is a must-read.
 "Jesus plus nothing" is the mantra of the Fellowship, also 
			known as 
			
			the Family, a secret, fundamentalist Christian organization 
			peopled primarily by devout policy makers and high-ranking 
			individuals.
 
			  
			Though the nonbeliever's view of 
			religion can often be dismissive when faced with such catchphrases, 
			in "C Street," a nonfiction account of the extended reach of the 
			Family, these phrases fuel moral crusades with real, and terrifying, 
			impact.
 Sharlet first introduced the world to the unseen hand of the 
			Fellowship in "The Family" in 2008, in which he reported on the 
			organization's beginnings in the 18th century, uncovered the role of 
			the Family in America's legislative system and uncovered the role of 
			religious fundamentalism in our supposedly secular nation.
 
 In his latest book, Sharlet traces the powerful orthodoxy's chilling 
			influence on governments both inside and outside of the United 
			States as well as the devastating effects of fundamentalism within 
			the military.
 
			  
			He uses the Fellowship's Capitol Hill boarding house, 
			C Street, as a passageway to a broader discussion of the Family's 
			influences, which range from mediating the marital disputes of 
			Congressmen to increased military aid for countries whose prominent 
			politicians have connections (spiritual or otherwise) with the 
			Family.
 "C Street" is thoroughly researched; in addition to his travels and 
			interviews, Sharlet says he spent weeks photocopying documents from 
			archives all over the country. In particular, he went through nearly 
			600 boxes of documents at the Billy Graham archives in Wheaton, 
			Illinois, where he stayed in a rented room furnished only with an 
			air mattress and a card table.
 
 Sharlet begins his story at the C Street Center Inc., a nonprofit 
			offshoot of the Family in a red brick house on Capitol Hill to,
 
				
				"assist [congressmen] in better 
				understandings of the teachings of Christ, and applying 
				it to their jobs." 
			Members of C Street, "the underground 
			network of Christ's men in Washington," include Sens., 
				
					
					
					Don Nickles (R-Oklahoma)
					
					Charles Grassley (R-Iowa)
					
					Pete Domenici (R-New Mexico)
					
					John Ensign (R-Nevada)
					
					James Inhofe (R-Oklahoma)
					
					Bill Nelson (D-Florida), 
					 
			...as well as Reps., 
				
					
					
					Jim DeMint (R-South Carolina)
					
					Frank Wolf (R-Virginia.)
					
					Joseph Pitts (R Pennsylvania)
					
					Zach Wamp (R-Tennessee) 
					
					
					Bart Stupak (D-Michigan), 
					 
			...and believe they have been appointed 
			by God.
 Their actions in the name of the Lord include prayer meetings at the 
			Department of Defense and the Pentagon, and helping Governor 
			Sanford, Representative Pickering and Senator Ensign (whom Sharlet 
			describes as having "the most impressive tan in the Technicolor 
			portrait gallery of golf-happy, twenty-first-century political 
			America") cover up extramarital affairs and continue their political 
			careers.
 
			  
			In one case, the Family even pays off Ensign's former aide 
			- with whom he was having an affair while he was living at C Street.
 This is a mild version of the Family's philosophy:
 
				
				"the best way to help the weak is to 
				help the strong."  
			Yet, it is their naïve, but powerful, 
			influence on religious rhetoric used in conflicts and legislature 
			abroad that leads one from simply raised eyebrows to widened eyes.
 According to Sharlet, the Family had,
 
				
				"cells in the governments of seventy 
				nations by the late 1960s, more than double that of just a few 
				years earlier."  
			These cells operated, as many of the 
			Family's projects do, through God, 
				
				"the Catholic generals and colonels 
				who rotated coup by coup through the leadership of Brazil, 
				Guatemala, El Salvador... consented to the Protestant 
				ministrations of the Fellowship in return for access to American 
				congressman." 
			More recently, after meetings between 
			members of Sri Lanka's own prayer breakfast and Congressional 
			representatives of the Family, the small, Southeast Asian country 
			received more than $50 million in military aid between 2004-2007.
			 
			  
			In the previous three years, from 2000 
			to 2003, it only received a fifth of that amount, and in 2008, Sri 
			Lanka was accused of "intentionally and repeatedly" wantonly 
			shelling civilians, hospitals and humanitarian operations with 
			weapons that, it is likely, came from American military aid.
 Most vivid is Sharlet's focus on the Fellowship's activities in 
			Uganda, where, in 2009, a bill was introduced into the Ugandan 
			Parliament that would condemn to death individuals convicted of,
 
				
				"aggravated homosexuality," which 
				includes "simply sex, more than once," and three years in prison 
				"for failure to report a homosexual within twenty-four hours of 
				learning of his or her crime." 
			Sharlet draws links between the Family 
			and evangelical church leaders and politicians championing the bill 
			in Uganda (including David Bahati, who introduced the legislation 
			into Parliament); the Family has donated millions of dollars to 
			Uganda for "leadership development" - more, writes Sharlet, than it 
			has invested in any other foreign country.
 Though he draws the line at saying that the virulently anti-gay bill 
			in Uganda means that the Family supports the death penalty for gay 
			people, he notes that that,
 
				
				"the real question is instead one of 
				ideological transmission, the transfer of ideas... the Family 
				didn't pull the trigger; they provided the gun." 
			Sharlet travels to the East African 
			country to meet politicians, who blithely call the closet "a strong 
			African tradition," and speak confidently of their "American 
			friends," various American evangelicals, including some from the 
			family, but also speaks to a young, gay man on the run, illustrating 
			with affecting anecdotes the human lives ruined by such a tide of 
			"morality."
 Near the end of the book, Sharlet brings the story back home again: 
			to the role of the Family in the military.
 
			  
			He tells the story of a US unit in Iraq 
			which heads into combat with "Jesus Killed Muhammed" painted 
			in both English and Arabic on one of their tanks, as well as Muslim 
			and Jewish soldiers who crack under the constant religious taunting. 
			  
			  
			
			 
			 
			jesus 
			killed mohammed 
			  
			
			The book itself reads like a hyper-real nightmare; the detailed 
			glimpses of emotionally stifled Congressional love affairs come with 
			the added intimacy of love letter excerpts, and Sharlet's 
			conversations with evangelical politicians in Uganda are especially 
			well-fleshed.
 
			  
			For example, during one conversation 
			with an evangelical politician, Sharlet became keenly aware that he 
			could also be prosecuted under Uganda's homophobic legislation - for 
			promoting homosexuality by not turning in any gay people he may 
			know.
 The extent of the connections between the Family and chastised 
			senators, the Sri Lankan government's decision to drop bombs on 
			civilians, a virulently homophobic bill in Uganda or extreme 
			religious pressure applied to soldiers in combat zones are at times 
			somewhat murky, but this is itself a symptom of how the Fellowship 
			functions,
 
				
				"the more invisible you can make 
				your organization," Doug Coe, associate director of the 
				Fellowship, says in "C Street," "the more influence it will 
				have." 
			The Family divides its finances, 
				
				"between several smaller offshoots, 
				some off-the-books accounting... and the Fellowship Foundation."
				 
			In addition, Sharlet notes, it shifts 
			around its properties and supporting organizations - for example, 
			the Downing Foundation in Englewood, Colorado, describes its mission 
			as supporting the Family's Fellowship Foundation, 
				
				"to which it sends an average of 
				$88,000 a year." 
			Sharlet highlights numerous front 
			organizations, though there are other sources of funding for the 
			Family's expenses that are even less kosher - for example, Sen. Tom 
			Coburn charged American taxpayers $11,000 for a trip to Lebanon to, 
			Coburn says, build prayer groups - in one of the most religiously 
			contested areas in the world.
 Though a review in The Washington Post calls Sharlet's thesis of an 
			America without contraception or public schools "almost unhinged," 
			the recent rise of the Tea Party since "C Street's" publication and 
			legislation such as unemployment benefits held hostage to tax cuts 
			for the wealthiest American cast doubt on whether we can dismiss the 
			threat posed by the actions of the Family to positions such as gay 
			rights, religious freedom or the separation between church and 
			state.
 
 This brings us to one of Sharlet's central points in the book: how 
			do we hold lawmakers accountable who believe they have a divine 
			right to rule?
 
 Mikey Weinstein, a former Air Force commander and founder and 
			president of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, who deals 
			with calls daily from soldiers with testimony of religious 
			harassment, says the only way to combat the influence of the,
 
				
				"multi-dimensional, theocratic, 
				dominating, democracy-destroying monster" that is the Family is 
				to court-martial them all. 
			Sharlet, however, is more circumspect.
			 
				
				"I'm doing it the best way I know 
				how ... it's also the only honest way. You compete with them in 
				terms of free speech," he said. "You keep the pressure on, you 
				keep people asking questions and you make it in the Family's 
				best interest to become transparent." 
				  
			  |