|
There is so much to know' before the invasion of Iraq in 2003 can be fully understood and it goes back a long way. The idea that the conquest of Iraq was decided in a matter of weeks because of the imminent-danger to tl1e world of Saddam Hussein should insult the intelligence of a pea: It was .part of a long planned strategy for global conquest.
In 2003 we had the Bush family in the White House, Dick Cheney as Vice President and Colin Powell as Secretary of State, and a United States international 'coalition' went to 'war' with Iraq. In 1991 the Bush family was in the White House, Cheney was Defense Secretary and Powell was head of the US forces as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and a United States international coalition' went to war with Iraq.
If you add together the casualties from the initial conflict, and the economic sanctions and bombing that followed, the '91 Gulf war cost the lives of a million Iraqi children, even without the child casualties, immediate and long-term, of the invasion of 2003. The Gulf War of father George Bush, like the latest one fronted by his idiot son, was a coldly manipulated set-up.
The apparent cause was a dispute between Iraq and Kuwait, a country that has been under British and Illuminati control back to the days when the economic potential of oil was discovered. Iraq has one of the world' s larges oil deposits and has attracted the constant attention of the US and British elite. In fact, countries like Kuwait, Iraq and others in the Middle East, were created by the British and their fellow European powers drawing lines in the sand. Kuwait is a dictatorship, an unpleasant one, and the idea that the Gulf War was to 'free' Kuwaitis just as ridiculous as the claim that the 2003 invasion of Iraqi was to 'liberate' the people.
After the first Gulf conflict what happened?
Saddam was left in power in Iraq and the Kuwaiti royal dictatorship was brought back with American and British support to continue their policy of the murder and torture of 'dissidents' who campaign for little luxuries like freedom and a say in the running of their own country. Saddam Hussein, the designated villain of both conflicts, was in fact one of the gang. He was a member of the elite Safari Club, which began as a consortium also involving SAVAK, the CIA-connected secret police of the Shah of Iran; Anwar Sadat, the later assassinated.
President of Egypt and Saudi Arabian Intelligence. It has been implicated in countless coups in Africa to further its goals and is heavily involved in arms trading and supply. Out of the Safari Club came the Pinay Circle, or Le Cercle, named after the French Prime Minister, Antoine Pinay. He was a major Illuminati asset who attended the first official meeting of the Bilderberg Group at Oosterbeek, Holland, in May 1954.
Others involved with Le Cercle included the Habsburg family, a major Illuminati bloodline. To give you an idea of its make-up. and range of influence, the Le Cercle membership has included:
No doubt neo-con Michael Ledeen knows him well; Silva Munoz, a former minister for the fascist Franco in Spain and a member of the elite secret society within the Roman Catholic network, Opus Dei; Franz Josef Strauss, the German Defense Minister; and Monsignore Brunello, an agent to the Vatican.
In America, one of the Le Cercle fronts is alleged to be the CIA-backed Heritage Foundation in Washington. Look at the potential for such an organization to be a coordinating force between apparently different agencies and countries to achieve a common aim. Le Cercle and the Safari Club are basically the same entity, which is why, as the Wall Street Journal reported on August 16th 1990, it was the CIA who supported the Ba'ath Party in Iraq and orchestrated a coup that installed Saddam Hussein as dictator in 1968, just as they did with Colonel Gaddafi in Libya.
But, it is important to remember that
everyone is expendable to the cause if tl1eir subsequent removal
best serves the agenda.
He was named by the Clinton State Department as funder of Mr of Osama bin Laden and he was also an investor in Harken Energy, one of boy George Bush's oil companies {see Alice in Wonderland and the World Trade Center Disaster). James Bath a close friend of George W. Bush for decades was the Texas representative of Bin Mahfouz.
The purpose of the BCCI was to wash drug money and provide a channel for the funding by government agencies like the CIA of the terrorist groups that are used to serve the agenda. Sherman Skolnick has claimed publicly, including an interview on Radio Free America, that father Bush, Saddam Hussein and others, used the BCCI to split $250 billion in oil 'kick backs', the skimming-off of money paid by western oil companies in the Gulf. Other researchers and insiders have said the same.
Skolnick claims that the records implicating Bush in deals with Sad dam and former Panama President Manuel Noriega were in the hands of the Bank of England and that the money was channeled through the BCCI and Banca Nazionale del Lavoro (BNL) branches in the USA.
Henry Gonzales, the chairman of the House Banking Committee, identified links between the BCCI and BNL. Skolnick told interviewer Tom Valentine on Radio Free America:
Skolnick said records detailing the alleged Bush-Saddam deals were held in the Chicago branch of the BCCI, which was seized by the Federal government in 1988.
He went on:
These US-supplied 'weapons' included anthrax and bubonic plague cultures.
Conspiracy theory? No, no, this information is contained in declassified US State Department documents that came to light in late 2002.
Rumsfeld's meeting with Saddam, preceded by a warm handshake, was part of the Reagan-Bush (in other words Bush) policy of close cooperation with the Iraqi dictator. The documents reveal that the United States increased arms supplies to Saddam even after he had used US-supplied poison gas against the Kurds in 1987 and 1988.3
President Boy George Bush and Tony Blair constantly repeated in 'justifying' the 2003 invasion of Iraq that Saddam had used chemical weapons "against his own people" when, in truth, the US and Britain had supplied the means to do it. This US support for Saddam continued for seven years and only a week before Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1990, the US ambassador to Baghdad assured him that the then President father George Bush "wanted better and deeper relations". An investigation in 1994 by the Senate Banking Committee disclosed that dozens of biological agents were shipped to Iraq in the mid~80s under license from the US Commerce Department.
These included strains of anthrax that Rumsfeld, Bush and Powell cited in 2003 as one of the reasons they must invade Iraq. A month before Rumsfeld's visit to Baghdad, George (Illuminati) Shultz, the Secretary of State, was given intelligence reports showing that Iraqi troops were resorting to "almost daily use of CW (chemical weapons) against the Iranians".4
Rumsfeld claimed he had "cautioned" Saddam about the use of chemical weapons at the 1983 meeting. So why supply them in the first place? Once again Rumsfeld is lying. Of course he is; he's speaking isn't he? When Rumsfeld's lie was contradicted by the declassified State Department note of his meeting with Saddam, a Pentagon spokesman said that Mr Rumsfeld issued the caution to Tariq Aziz, the Iraqi Foreign Minister. If you are caught out on one lie, what do you do? You tell another.
Howard Teicher, a former National Security Council official during the Reagan Administration, said in a sworn affidavit that the United States,
Teicher said that William Casey, the
former CIA Director, supplied Saddam with cluster bomb through a
front company in Chile.
At the time of the nuclear deal ABB's then chief executive Goran Lindahl, announced a "wide-ranging, long-term cooperation agreement" with the communist government. The type of reactors involved produce plutonium that needs refining before it can be weaponised. One US congressman and critic of the North Korean regime described the reactors as "nuclear bomb factories".7
When questioned about this outrageous hypocrisy, Rumsfeld's office said that the defense secretary did not "recall it being brought before the board at any time".8 Still more diplomatic amnesia. Sorry, lying. A spokesman for ABB said that all board members were informed about the deal. It is worth emphasizing this again:
This money was dispatched to Sad dam after November 1989 when the Bush White House guaranteed bank loans to Iraq if they were to be used for the purchase for US farm products. If Saddam defaulted, the US taxpayers picked up the tab for"the loan and, since he was always defaulting, that was obviously going to be the outcome from the start. As planned, Saddam spent the money on arms, including purchases from the Matrix Churchill machine tool company in England.
This company was the subject of a court case in which the British government was implicated. Although many US investigators warned Bush that the money was being used for arms, the loans were allowed "to continue. The aim was obvious" when you look of the other evidence. Bush was doing the same as his father did with Hitler. He was funding an aggressor so he could start-a war with him.
Some of the money was spent on buying poison gas from a CIA front called Cardeon Industries in Chile.9 When the war started, Saddam defaulted on the loans and the US taxpayers footed the bill for Iraq to fight their own sons and daughters. The cover-up of this, as usual, led to the targeting of the small fry. The whole thing was blamed on the bank manager at the BNL's Atlanta branch, Christopher P. Drogoul, who could never have sanctioned that sort of money without the highest authorization.
A guy called Peter Kawaja said in an American radio interview that he was involved at one time with Product Ingredient Technology in Boca Raton, Florida, and with Ishan Barbouti International (IBI), the builder of Pharma 150, the chemical and biological weapons complex in Rabta, Libya.10 His experiences led him to investigate what was going on.
He said he went to the CIA and FBI and operated for the US government under a code name because they told him these people were international terrorists and that they were going to prosecute them. Kawaja said that he did his own investigation, however, which included "bugging telephone lines, buildings, and certain other locations throughout the United States".
He said he,
He said he recorded calls going to and coming from Baghdad, to and from the United States and London, CIA, FBI, FBI counterintelligence, US Customs, certain politicians and numerous other individuals.
US District Judge Marvin Shoob said the claim that the Atlanta branch of the BNL could 'loan $5 billion to Iraq without the approval of the head office in Rome could only come out of "never-never land".
The judge said of manager Drogoul and four other employees at the branch:
This is the last thing the father Bush administration and the Illuminati wanted to hear. Judge Shoob was removed from the case and replaced by Judge Ernest Tidwell, who refused to allow any evidence to be presented about the CIA and the Bush-White House involvement in the bank. Drogoul was persuaded to plead guilty even though he wasn't.
The funding of the Iraqi arms build-up before the Gulf War and the supplying of weapons involved the Bush administration, the British government, the Italian government, the Soviet Union and other leading governments and corporations controlled by the Illuminati. One of the network of Illuminati private 'armies' is called the Wackenhut Corporation and investigative journalist John Connolly exposed in a Spy Magazine article12 that Wackenhut had been involved in the arming of Iraq before the first Gulf War by transporting the means to produce the very chemical weapons that father George Bush and Co were saying posed such a threat to the world.
George Wackenhut, a former FBI operative, started the company with other FBI associates in 1954 and its board has been packed over the years with recruits from the FBI, CIA and the military. It has since merged with Group 4 Falck, the world's second largest provider of Security Services.
George Wackenhut is a long-time friend of father George Bush and has contributed generously to his political campaigns and those of boy George and Florida governor Jeb Bush.
Journalist John Connolly wrote:
The supply of weapons and money involved another familiar name, Henry Kissinger, the former Secretary of State and National Security Advisor to Richard Nixon at the time of the Watergate scandal and a genocide maniac who is now threatened with arrest in several countries for war crimes.
As early as 1984 his company Kissinger Associates was arranging for loans from the BNL to Iraq to finance its arms purchases from a little-known subsidiary of Fiat, which was headed by major Illuminati initiate Giovanni Agnelli. Charles Barletta, a former Justice Department investigator, was quoted about this in the US Spotlight newspaper on November 9th 1992.
The report said:
But it was good for the oil, banking and armament cartel (all controlled by the Illuminati) and for divide' and rule. In 1990-91 Saddam would be used again, knowingly or otherwise, to start another war in the Gulf, another conflict planned long before.
Author and researcher George C. Andrews reported:
To readers of my books, the answers to
these questions will be obvious.
Tuning is everything to the Illuminati. They have a specific agenda with a specific timescale. As former Blair cabinet minister Clare Short has said, the date of the second invasion of Iraq was known long before it happened and events were manipulated to hit the deadline. This was the reason for the weapons inspectors of H. Blix being denied the time to complete their inspections. It was the same in 1991.
Suddenly father Bush changed his stance and labeled Saddam "the new Hitler". He said the Second World War had shown that appeasement of such people was not the answer. He might have added that it is also not the answer to fund both sides in a conflict and to help finance Hitler's war machine, as his father had done. For those who knew the game plan, it was easy to see what was happening.
Bush announced on November 8th 1990 that the forces in Saudi Arabia would be substantially increased the 'defensive' force was now to switch to offensive mode and the Bush 'UN forces' attacked on Wednesday, January 16th 1991, as planned all along. 120,000 air sorties were unleashed on Iraq, mostly, it turned out, against civilian areas. Bush's Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Colin Powell, who has ancestral links with many old American and British families, headed the operation.
The number of dead and injured from the
bombing of Iraq, the resulting disease and the economic sanctions
can hardly be comprehended. Conditions for the civilians in Iraq
have been unimaginable under the economic stranglehold that was
imposed through the United Nations by America and Britain after the
Gulf War.
Iraqi men, women and children were subjected to the most intense bombing blitz in human history. At least tens of thousands died in the bombardment and while the media were showing us pictures provided by the US military of 'smart bombs' that could target a building and go through a toilet window, the truth that was being suppressed daily by the military censors was very different.
At least 93% of the bombs that rained from the Iraqi skies were not 'smart' and that's according to the Pentagon's own numbers, and 70% of them missed their target. Other civilian targets were struck under the guise of being military or weapon-making centers. A civilian bomb shelter was hit because "intelligence told us it was a military headquarters".
Reporter Peter Arnett, then with CNN, visited the civilian bomb shelter in Iraq and found it was ... a bomb shelter.
He also visited a milk factory bombed because it was a "chemical weapons factory" and found it was... a milk factory. In fact he had been there a year before and it was producing ... milk.
Mistakes? Please.
Look again at how the Airman magazine described the capabilities of the Global Hawk unmanned surveillance plane deployed in Afghanistan and Iraq:
There are no mistakes about locations when you. have that level of surveillance technology.
Thousands of Iraqi soldiers were buried alive in 1991 as 'UN' forces used bulldozers to fill in their trenches in blatant contravention of international law. But nothing encapsulates the mentality of these deeply sick people currently waging the war on terrorism' better than the almost unimaginable attacks on the "Highway of Death'''.
The Iraqi army was in retreat in the wake of the air bombardment and headed out of Kuwait across the border to Basra. With them were civilians and prisoners. US pilots attacked the vehicles at the front and back of the seven mile retreating human convoy, so forcing it to a standstill on the open road. They then systematically bombed the convoy, constantly racing back to their 'aircraft carrier to re-arm and return to continue the mass murder.
As one pilot said, it was .like "shooting fish in a barrel" and thousands died at the hands of the very people who now 'fight terrorism' and promote themselves as morally superior to. those they target. Barry McCaffrey, one of the generals involved in this mass murder, was later appointed by President Clinton to head his 'War on Drugs'.
Yet, as he conducted these crimes against humanity, father George Bush approval ratings soared, just as they did for his son when he continued the long, long, family association with human genocide. The blatant defiance of the Geneva Convention on the Highway of Death produced no action against the Bush adIJ1inistration because there is one law for America, Britain and other 'Western' and English speaking nations, and a very different one for those they choose to bomb, kill, mutilate.
An International War Crimes Tribunal found,
...guilty of war crime.
But what was done as a result? Nothing.
These are the people who have the
audacity to put others on trial for war crimes, like the former
Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic.
His father would have been proud of him. Norman Schwarzkopf senior had been an important player in the British-American Intelligence coup called Operation AJAX, which removed the Iranian Prime Minister Dr Mohammad Mossadegh in 1953. The Illuminati wanted him ousted after he nationalized oil production and removed the oil cartel's power over his people.
The British bloodline Prime Minister, Winston Churchill, was also behind the coup. Mossadegh was replaced by the dictatorship of the Shah of Iran who reversed the oil nationalization (see And The Truth Shall Set You Free). It is rare for the Queen to give Honorary Knighthoods and other honors to people outside the Commonwealth, but those she has chosen read like an Illuminati Who's Who.
The titles are dubbed "honorary" because the American Constitution forbids the acceptance of titles from the monarch of a foreign state without the permission of Congress.
So few of these honors are given because, as a British government official put it:
I wonder if you think the following names debase the currency:
After the September 11th atrocities, the insider mayor of New York, Rudolph Giuliani, was appointed an Honorary Knight Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire for doing nothing more than the job he was paid handsomely to do.
So why was he such a chosen one?
For some more, realistic background to
'hero' Giuliani and his activities see the website of Robert
Lederman, a street artist in New York and a regular columnist for
the Greenwich Village Gazette. 17
One example during the 1991 Gulf Slaughter was when the American TV networks NBC and CBS refused to air pictures shot in Iraq of the destruction of civilian areas that revealed the Bush government and military accounts to be a grotesque fiction -just as they are In the 'war on terrorism'. The story was blocked by the President of NBC Michael Gartner and the producers offered it to CBS, where Tom Bettag, the Executive Editor of the CBS Evening News, said one of them would appear on the show the following day to tell their story.
That evening Bettag was sacked and the story buried. This is the real background to the TV news.18
Footage of the Highway of Death was also suppressed. Father Bush's lies about Iraqi troop deployments in Kuwait, provable by satellite images, were also never shown. This satellite 'loophole in the lies' was the reason why the US government purchased all rights to satellite pictures of Afghanistan while that country was subjected to another insane American and British bombing onslaught.
We should note, of course, that having said that the CIA-installed dictator Saddam Hussein was a there it to the world, and with the Iraqi' army' destroyed, father George Bush suddenly called an end to the 'war' and pulled the troops out leaving Saddam still intact.
As Norman Schwarzkopf said with an air of disappointment:
Ah, never mind Norman, but you see your
president and those who controlled him wanted Hussein to stay put,
or at least appear to, so they could play that card again more than
a decade later.
Investigative journalist John Pilger wrote of a woman he met in northern Iraq who had lost her husband, children and father-in-law when they were bombed by two US planes while tending their sheep on open land.19 The sanctions against a country that imports 70% of its food were imposed on a people already devastated by the mass bombing of their electricity, water supply, transport and sewer systems, which the British and American governments refused to allow them to rebuild.
A public health team from Harvard University went into Iraq soon after the official bombing and estimated that over 46,000 children under the age of five had already died by August 1991 because of the destruction of Iraq's infrastructure.20 But the nightmare was only beginning. Writer Thomas J Nagy exposed the coldly calculated way the US military targeted the Iraqi. water supply in the full knowledge of the gruesome effect this would have on the people, especially children.
In an article headed "The Secret Behind the Sanctions: How the US Intentionally Destroyed Iraq's Water Supply", he wrote that the United States knew the cost that civilian Iraqis, mostly children, would pay, and it went ahead anyway.21 Nagy, who lectures at the School of Business and Public Management at George Washington University uncovered documents from the US Defense Intelligence Agency that reveal a stunning disregard for human life.
A document dated January 22nd 1991 says:
This is a massive violation of the Geneva Convention, which says:
The US/British-led UN sanctions against I have done all of these things. By 1995 Secretary of State Madeleine Albright was forced to admit on the SixtyMinutes television program that these sanctions had already cost the lives of half a million Iraqi children and that was only up to then. Albright said on Sixty Minutes that she thought the consequences for those children were worth it to stop Saddam.
That is stunning enough, but, of course, by invading Iraq a second time in 2003 they were saying that the sanctions and all that death and suffering was for nothing. This is the mentality that controls our world. A report by Richard Garfield of Columbia University concluded that the increase in child death rates in Iraq was virtually unique in modem health studies.23
Denis Halliday, coordinator of the so-called 'Oil-for-Food Program' resigned in September 1998 and spoke out against the genocidal effects of the sanctions. His successor, Hans von Sponeck, did the same in February 2000. The US government response was to try to discredit the two men. The 'oil for food' farce provided the oil cartel with cheap Iraqi oil. Forty per cent of Iraq's oil, exchanged to buy food, ended up in the United States at knock-down prices because of the sanctions imposed by the United States and Britain to the immense benefit of the Illuminati oil cartel.
The forces of freedom and liberty have also been bombing Iraq with weapons containing spent uranium and this has led to the birth of babies with horrible deformities and disease (Figures 8 and 9). Since this bombardment began in 1991 Iraq has developed the world's highest rate of childhood leukemia.
At the same time there was an embargo on medicines and technology that would help to reduce the radiation.
The genocidal attacks on the Iraqi population began with 'Republican' father George Bush, continued with 'Democrat' Bill Clinton, and within a month of taking office at the start of 2001, George W. Bush, another ,'Republican', was ordering (being told to order) more "routine" bombing of Iraq.
In all they are just lackeys for the
same one-party state and that's why the policies never change no
matter who is in the White House.
Add to that the voting record of the United States at the United Nations where it has consistently opposed resolutions to limit the production and testing of biological and nuclear weapons, as it has on a stream of humanitarian and freedom issues. While the US government was lying about the threat to the world from Saddam's chemical weapons, in one location alone in the United States, Anniston, Alabama, were 873,020 pounds of sarin, 1,657,480 pounds of VX nerve agent and 1,876,760 pounds of mustard-agent. 24 Across America the military is storing 23,415 tons of liquid sarin nerve agent blister-causing mustard agent, a deadly nerve liquid called VX and variants 46,830,000 pounds of chemicals.25
A teaspoon is enough to kill or maim. The United States is required by . international treaty to destroy all chemical weapons by 2007, but nearly 75 per cent of the nation's now-banned arms still exist. The moralizing of the United States government and the brain-dead people who support the continuing death and destruction is sickening beyond measure.
The US is:
Amnesty International said in 1996:
British leaders, too, have an appalling record of mass murder. As far back as 1919, when Winston Churchill was Secretary of State at the War Office, they were using chemical weapons against Iraq. When poison gas was used to put down an Iraqi rebellion against colonial rule, Churchill said:
A soldier who fought with the British army in the Gulf War of 1991 told me that chemical weapons were used against the Iraqi troops in that conflict.
Robert Cooper, a former diplomat and personal assistant for foreign affairs to British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, admitted in The Post-Modern State and the World Order:
Cooper said that the 1991 conflict with Iraq was to maintain control of oil supplies and "... the reasons for fighting the Gulf War were not that Iraq had violated the norms of international behavior ... "
Exactly.
They just use any excuse to sell a lie
to the people to introduce their agenda -as they have with September
11th and the second 'war' with Iraq.
Ritter said in the June 2000 edition of Arms Control Today:
They were unwilling because it would have destroyed the cover story necessary to continue the mass killing and 'sell' the planned invasion of 2003. The consequences for the people of Iraq of the 1991 war and the sanctions that followed were beyond comprehension. The country was already in a desperate state even before the US and British blitzkrieg was visited upon them for the second time.
Arundhati Roy wrote in the UK Guardian:
Precisely.
|
