| 
			  
			  
			
			
  
			by Brendan DeMelle 
			
			14 February 12 
			from
			
			DeSmogBlog Website 
			  
			  
			Internal Heartland Institute strategy 
			and funding documents obtained by DeSmogBlog expose the heart of the 
			climate denial machine - its current plans, many of its funders, and 
			details that confirm what DeSmogBlog and others have reported for 
			years.  
			  
			The heart of the climate denial machine 
			relies on huge corporate and foundation funding from U.S. businesses 
			including Microsoft, Koch Industries, Altria (parent company of 
			Philip Morris) RJR Tobacco and more. 
			We are releasing the entire trove of documents now to allow 
			crowd-sourcing of the material.
 
			  
			Here are a few quick highlights, stay 
			tuned for much more.
 
				
					
					
					Confirmation that 
					Charles G. Koch Foundation is again funding Heartland 
					Institute’s global warming disinformation campaign.   
					[Update: 
					Apparently even the Koch brothers think the Heartland 
					Institute's climate denial program is too toxic to fund. On 
					Wednesday, Koch confirmed that it did not cut a check for 
					the $200K mentioned in the strategy memo after all. A 
					statement released on 
					
					KochFacts.com and the 
					charleskochfoundationfacts.org states that "…the Charles 
					Koch Foundation provided $25,000 to the Heartland Institute 
					in 2011 for research in healthcare, not climate change, and 
					this was the first and only donation the Foundation made to 
					the institute in more than a decade. The Foundation has made 
					no further commitments of funding to Heartland.”]
 Greenpeace’s Koch 
					
					reports show the 
					
					last time Heartland 
					received Koch funding was in 1999.
 
 The "January 2012 Confidential Memo: 2012 Heartland Climate 
					Strategy" 
					
					states:
 
					
						
						“We will also pursue 
						additional support from the Charles G. Koch Foundation. 
						They returned as a Heartland donor in 2011 with a 
						contribution of $200,000.    
						We expect to push up their 
						level of support in 2012 and gain access to their 
						network of philanthropists, if our focus continues to 
						align with their interests.    
						Other contributions will be 
						pursued for this work, especially from corporations 
						whose interests are threatened by climate policies.” 
					** The Heartland 
					Institute alleges that the 2012 climate strategy document is 
					a "fake" and has threatened the DeSmogBlog with legal 
					action. However, the organization has not provided any proof 
					to support its allegations. We see no basis in fact or law 
					for us to remove this document, and will leave it available 
					in the public interest.
 
					
						
						Our climate work is 
						attractive to funders, especially our key Anonymous 
						Donor (whose contribution dropped from $1,664,150 in 
						2010 to $979,000 in 2011 - about 20% of our total 2011 
						revenue). He has promised an increase in 2012…”
 
					
						
						“funding for high-profile 
						individuals who regularly and publicly counter the 
						alarmist AGW message.    
						At the moment, this funding 
						goes primarily to Craig Idso ($11,600 per month), Fred 
						Singer ($5,000 per month, plus expenses), Robert Carter 
						($1,667 per month), and a number of other individuals, 
						but we will consider expanding it, if funding can be 
						found.”
 
					
					
					As Brad Johnson 
					
					reported today 
					at ThinkProgress, confirmation that Heartland is working 
					with 
					
					David Wojick, a U.S. Energy Department contract worker 
					and coal industry consultant, to develop a ‘Global Warming 
					Curriculum for K-12 Schools.’
 
					
					Forbes and other business press 
					are favored outlets for Heartland’s dissemination of climate 
					denial messages, and the group is worried about maintaining 
					that exclusive space.    
					They note in particular the work 
					of Dr. 
					
					Peter Gleick: 
					
						
						“Efforts at places such as 
						Forbes are especially important now that they have begun 
						to allow high-profile climate scientists (such as Gleick) 
						to post warmist science essays that counter our own.
						   
						This influential audience 
						has usually been reliably anti-climate and it is 
						important to keep opposing voices out.”  
					Note the irony here that 
					Heartland Institute - one of the major mouthpieces behind 
					the debunked ‘Climategate’ email theft who harped about the 
					suppression of denier voices in peer-reviewed literature - 
					now defending its turf in the unscientific business magazine 
					realm.
 
					
						
						“Efforts might also include 
						cultivating more neutral voices with big audiences (such 
						as Revkin at DotEarth/NYTimes, who has a well-known 
						antipathy for some of the more extreme AGW communicators 
						such as Romm, Trenberth, and Hansen) or Curry (who has 
						become popular with our supporters).”
 
					
						
						“We have also pledged to 
						help raise around $90,000 in 2012 for Anthony Watts to 
						help him create a new website to track temperature 
						station data.” 
			The Heartland Institute's legacy of 
			evasion of this level of transparency and accountability has now 
			been shattered. 
 
			  
			
			Additional documentation
 
				
			 
			  
			  |