|
by David Wilcock from Ascension2000 Website recovered through WayBackMachine Website
BASICS OF AETHERIC QUANTUM MECHANICS
The more esoteric questions
related to how torsion fields connect with consciousness and spirituality
shall be relegated to later chapters; at this point, our main concern is to
establish a working system of physics that explains exactly what matter is.
If nothing else, Kozyrev’s findings show us that we still do not have an
adequate model to answer that question.
These pioneers would include
Each of these sources contain different pieces of “the puzzle”, however we feel that the work of Rod Johnson is needed for all remaining paradoxes to be completely accounted for – and it shall be introduced in Chapter Four.
Although it is certainly possible for future authors to
present a complete, unified model, we will just cover enough interesting
highlights here to show that such a model can and does indeed exist.
However, as we said, there was a strong desire for secrecy
in the Soviet regime on these matters, and Ginzburg never mentions Kozyrev’s
name in his work. Nevertheless, Ginzburg discovered that a few simple
changes could be made to the common equations for relativity theory that
would not disagree with any known observations and that furthermore
perfectly explain the weight-changing anomalies of matter that Kozyrev had
noted.
Yet, in very loose terms, Ginzburg found that you could completely reverse (invert) these equations without violating any known scientific observations. This means that instead of growing more massive, an object will actually shed energy back into the aether as it is moved, thus causing it to gradually lose all of its core characteristics of gravitational mass, inertial mass and electric charge as it approaches the speed of light.
Ginzburg introduces these new concepts in the next quote: [We have added emphasis and deleted the letters for terms such as “velocity” in order to enhance readability:]
As seen here, an object’s overall mass (weight) is represented by both gravitational and inertial masses, which are simply measurements of how gravity and inertia behave on the object. Curiously, both gravity and inertia have essentially identical effects on matter, which is known as Einstein’s “Principle of Equivalence”.
This principle shows us that gravity and inertia are two forms of the same energy at equal strength – one moving downward (gravity) and one providing resistance as we move through space (inertia.) This is one of the easiest ways to see that there must indeed be an “aether” or “physical vacuum” that is behind both forces, and Kozyrev had also noted this connection in his own studies.
So, once we start
accelerating an object, (which we said is like a sponge submerged in water
in this new model,) the added pressure will compress the atoms and molecules
in the object and cause more and more of its aether to be released.
The “ultimate spiral field velocity” of “C” that Ginzburg mentions is slightly higher than the normal speed of light, due to the spiraling path that he believes all energy must follow. This simple change to the basic relativity equations then leads to a new quantum physics of transmutation, with the concept that an object could completely disappear from our known physical reality.
This raises a key question: “Disappear to where?”
MISHIN AND ASPDEN BOTH FIND DIFFERENT LEVELS OF AETHER DENSITY
In this book we shall refer to these levels as densities. As one example, if you put pressure on a beach ball by slowly pushing it into water, you can gradually move it from being surrounded by air to being surrounded by water, which is denser. When you release the pressure that you placed on the beach ball, the higher density of the water will cause it to pop back into the lower-density atmosphere once more. You will see that nothing in the basic form of the beach ball has changed.
Though this is a rather crude analogy, it is by far
the best one to explain many anomalies that we will discuss throughout this
book.
These findings were established through measurements taken by auto-oscillating electromechanical systems similar to some of Kozyrev’s designs, with an undisclosed “added component” that was more suited to detecting torsion waves from biological systems as opposed to inorganic systems.
With these measurement devices and techniques, Mishin could detect:
Mishin numbered the different densities of aether that he discovered as follows:
As we can see, it appears that each level of aether that Mishin discovered has a different level of density than the others, most specifically visible in the first three, which are obviously in decreasing order of density. We should remember that Dr. Mishin is not the only scientist to have discovered that the aether exists at different density levels.
Since the 1950s, Dr.
Harold Aspden has documented similar discoveries, and in his case they are
backed up by extensive equations. Furthermore, all the major foundations of
Aspden’s work had successfully passed peer-review processes and ended up
being published in prestigious scientific journals, and this material shall
be covered in later chapters. Also, the 19th century physicist John Keely
classified seven different densities of aether, probably through a discovery
process similar to Dr. Mishin’s.
Such
a wonderful, elegant solution to the quirky mathematical problems of “higher
dimensions” is exactly what we would expect to see in a Divine Cosmos. The
purest, most harmonic vibrations of visible light and audible sound are both
conveniently organized into an Octave framework, and it appears that the
vibrations of the aether are no different.
Mishin gives us the direct observational evidence that such levels exist, and Aspden gives us a complete mathematical foundation to explain how and why they exist. Never before has there been a theory of quantum physics that can account for mysterious, documented effects related to objects appearing, disappearing and / or reappearing around us.
These effects include the anomalies of the Bermuda Triangle and other such vortexes as well as the many surprising, scientifically documented accounts of telekinesis, such as those now emerging from China in Paul Dong’s book China’s Super Psychics, discussed later in this book. The material in this book sets forth such a theory that satisfies these requirements. Even more importantly, we will establish that these differing aetheric densities must also correspond to different levels of intelligence and consciousness.
And for now, we must continue to focus on
the basics.
Obviously, Ginzburg’s theory is in exact harmony with Kozyrev’s findings. Ultimately, the “aether” must be visualized at the tiniest level as being composed of spherical bubbles of aetheric energy that exist throughout the entire Universe. Torsion waves move through this aether by causing adjacent “field bubbles” to bump into each other.
No one bubble actually moves very
far in its position, just as a set of floating objects can essentially
remain in the same position as waves roll by in the water. Each time an
impulse of momentum hits a field bubble, the bubble then collides into its
neighbors, transferring the momentum. The impulse will continue to be
transferred along even though all the bubbles end up in the same relative
positions that they started in.
However, we will now demonstrate that the particle model
is nothing more than a belief that has been built up from a series of
assumptions.
Many people are not aware that this model cannot be true and is actually quite misleading, as a number of experiments confirm that the so-called “particles” behave as if they were waves. This leads to confusing problems such as the Schroedinger’s Cat paradox and Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle, both of which try to tell us that atoms are not actually “real” but are only “probabilities” at the quantum level. To have something that is not “real” as the foundation of matter seems quite absurd.
Here, we must remember that the majority of our conclusions about the quantum realm are assumptions only, which have been built up from only two indirect sources:
Beginning with the first on the list, spectroscope analysis is simpler than most would imagine. A particular element (group of atoms) is stored in a small, transparent container while it is in a changing state of energy, which causes it to release light (photons).
Then, a special form of light is shone through the element, which pushes the released photons along so that they pass through a prism (lens) or grating (slot) that breaks them up into a rainbow color spectrum. The spectrum is then recorded on film and analyzed, and due to the unique quality of the light radiation that is shined through the changing element, (which is appropriately named as “black body” radiation,) the film will only capture a small series of vertical colored lines.
These lines are created by untold numbers of photons, at
certain exact color frequencies, which the chemical element is releasing. So
all we know for certain is that the atoms are releasing certain color
frequencies of light (photons), which are then being analyzed – anything
else is an informed assumption.
Here is Dr. Milo Wolff’s explanation of this:
As Dr. Wolff indicates, the vast majority of our “particle” beliefs come from these two forms of measurement and the assumptions that have been inferred from them.
One additional case of “proof” concerns the idea that
atoms have a nucleus of particles. This came about from Rutherford’s
experiment where he bombarded a piece of very thin gold foil with
high-energy protons, and measured how many of the protons passed through the
foil. A very small but measurable number of the protons did not pass through
the foil. Since not all of the protons went through, Rutherford concluded
that these protons had bounced off of a tiny “nucleus” in the center of the
atom and that the rest of the area was largely “empty space.”
No atoms had even remotely been “seen” visually until 1985, when IBM Research Almaden Labs was the first to use an electron tunneling microscope to actually photograph the organization of molecules of germanium in an ink-blot. What we see from this experiment in Figure 2.1 are indistinct, fuzzy spherical objects that appear to have some non-spherical geometric qualities to their shape and are in an extremely geometric pattern of organization, which was definitely a surprise for conventional science.
The image was artificially colored orange and green to allow the eye to discriminate between the two types of atom that were seen:
Figure 2.1 – Actual photograph of atoms of germanium in an ink-blot. Furthermore, when quantum physicists have studied the “electrons” of the atom, they have observed that they are not actually “points” at all, but rather form smooth, teardrop-shaped “clouds” where the narrowest ends of the “drops” converge upon a very tiny point in the center (Figure 2.2).
Here, we shall reprint excerpts from Dr. Milo Wolff’s book just to make the point absolutely clear, with emphasis added:
As Dr. Wolff suggests, the observed teardrop shapes of electron clouds are exactly what we would expect when seeing a “standing wave” of vibration. We remember that the hydrogen atom’s electron cloud was seen to have a spherical shape.
This is also a direct indication that atoms are vortex
formations, since the hydrogen atom is considered the “building block” of
all the other elements, with one hypothetical “proton” in the nucleus and
one hypothetical “electron” that is actually represented by the spherical
cloud.
NEGATIVE AND POSITIVE: SIMPLE DIFFERENCES IN PRESSURE
This is known as “charge polarity,” since there are two charges that are polarized, or opposite. It has long been a mystery as to what this truly means, and why there is a “flow” of charge.
This problem has boggled the mind of many a scientist, and Dr. Aspden admits it in the following quote:
In Dr. O. Crane’s new model and certain others, these opposing charges, or
charge polarities of negative and positive are actually nothing more than
differences in aetheric pressure. The negative electron clouds have a higher
pressure, and the positive nucleus has a lower pressure. Put simply, the
negative charges in the electron clouds are flowing into the positively
charged area at the center of the atom.
The only real difference, then, between gravity and charge polarity is in the strength of aetheric pressure that is measured, and the degree of symmetry with which the energy flow presses in across the sphere’s surface. Why do we say symmetry is important? Simply put, the gravitational forces on Earth are very consistent from one place to another, whereas in the atom you have areas between the electron clouds where there is no “flow” of energy towards the center. We will explain why there are these partitioned areas later in this chapter.
If this model were indeed
true, Biefield proposed, then with a high enough level of electromagnetic
intensity, it should be possible for an anti-gravitational propulsive force
to be created.
Then, this plate condenser is charged with a high amount of electricity and suspended by a firm wire that would be able to rotate in a large circle on the horizontal plane if it were moved. When this object is charged up, it will move independently towards the positive plate of the condenser, sustaining a constant thrust and causing the whole wire / plate condenser assembly to spin around in circles by itself.
Then, Dr. Crane continues:
The last statement regarding the “polarization capability of the dielectric”
may be confusing. As we said, a dielectric is a non-conducting substance,
which in this experiment is sandwiched between the two oppositely charged
plates. The “polarization capability” refers to how well the dielectric
material can keep the charges between the two plates separated, or
polarized.
When a flow is established between the negative and positive pole, a river of energy is created in the surrounding aether, and the river of aetheric energy will forcefully move towards the positive. This effect is indeed strong enough to counteract gravity. Many reputable sources agree that Brown devised a means to create a self-contained unit which could defeat gravity and rise into the air on its own, and that his work was immediately classified thereafter.
Since that time, at the Disclosure Project Executive Summary Briefing on May
10, 2001, which Wilcock attended along with a number of congressional aides
and other invited guests, certain witnesses testified that various
deep-black programs have indeed mastered the use of this technology for
propulsion. The system of concentric magnetic rings and rotating magnetic
rollers, devised by Prof. John R. R. Searl and discussed in our previous
volume, is another workable anti-gravity system, and was successfully
duplicated and the results subsequently published in Russia by Roschin and
Godin.
Jeff Cameron of Transdimensional Technologies filmed two versions of his “T3” device in action, a triangular metallic frame with thin wires that were attached to each corner. Over a non-conducting circular base, the triangular frame is seen to levitate and slightly wobble around in the air once the electric current is turned on. A loud and satisfying “SNAP” is heard as the flow is cut off and the device abruptly drops back down to the surface. Not surprisingly, as of Feb. 2002 the entire contents of the website were pulled except for the title page, with a vague promise to “keep checking.”
Thankfully, in March 2002, Jim Ventura independently replicated the exact
same experiment, which is based on the research of Jean-Louis Naudin, and
three films of it now exist on Art Bell’s website for the general public to
view. Interestingly, the object spins around constantly on its wires in the
first two films, suggesting the spiraling pressure of torsion waves
(gravi-spin energy) at work.
This leads us to the conclusion that atoms and the “empty space” of aether that surrounds them are both made of the same fluidlike energetic material; the only difference is that in an atom, the aether has begun swirling into a low-pressure central vortex, traveling through the electron clouds. Not surprisingly, one informant from the Disclosure Project revealed that the manmade ARV craft (Alien Reproduction Vehicles) are known to the insiders as “flux-liners.”
This is an obvious
play on the term “airliner,” and demonstrates their knowledge that the
vehicles are riding on the aetheric energy flux or flow instead of air.
However, these spherical structures also have been seen to spin. Various techniques have been used to make this discovery, such as by measuring the qualities of identical “particles” as they are released from an emitter at successively different angles before colliding with a detector. The validity of the discovery of “spin” is not in dispute in the mainstream quantum world.
As Dr. Wolff states it in Chapter 10 of his book, entitled Particles and Electricity,
Thus, as “particles” move through the aether, their central axis of spin is
aligned with the direction of their motion. This gives them the exact same
“vortex” quality of movement as we would see with a smoke ring – this
formation is automatically created by any straight-line movement through a
fluid medium.
This whirlpool forms a complete hole through the
center of the sphere. On one pole of the sphere, the water will flow in,
with the vortex becoming progressively narrower as it approaches the center,
and then the continuing momentum of the water will cause it to flow out
through the opposite pole, the vortex becoming progressively wider as it
reaches the outer edge. The water must flow in one side and out the other,
since it has nowhere else to go. This is a basic property of “torus”
formations and can be seen in the inwardly-curling movement of smoke rings,
for example.
Figure 2.3 – The “Electromagnetotoroid,” showing the spherical-torus
formation at the quantum level. As we continue with our investigation into the phenomenon of spin, we find that others have adopted the spherical torus for the quantum realm as well. Dr. Harold Aspden’s theories in this regard are among the most comprehensive and well-substantiated mathematically, and have been published in some of the finest physics journals.
Dr. Aspden also illustrates the concept that atoms are actually spherical torus formations, while not using the word “torus”:
Both questions may be solved when we begin to understand the importance of what are known as the Platonic Solids, a set of five different geometric shapes that have a great deal of importance in ancient sacred science, and have been introduced in each of our previous volumes.
In short, the “Platonic Solid” geometric forms will naturally appear in a spherical “vortex” of vibrating (pulsating) fluid.
|
