Can you offer the layman an extremely simplified summary of what
scalars are, how they relate to Maxwellís equations, unified
field theory, and the limitations of currently accepted quantum
physics, relativity theory, and electromagnetics?
Whew! Youíve asked for a complete
explanation of how to unify the three major disciplines of
physics, specify whatís wrong with the three present versions of
those disciplines that has prevented their unification, and how
this was in Maxwellís original quaternion equations (some 200 of
which are actually his theory, not the pale four vector
equations written by Heaviside and Gibbs). You also asked for an
explanation of scalars versus vectors, and how the present
vector analysis (of Heaviside and Gibbs) misses the boat with
respect to structured scalars. And youíve asked me to do it
simply, in laymanís terms. To say that thatís a tall order is
the understatement of the decade!
Okay, weíll have a go at it anyway. Weíll start with scalars and
Basically we visualize things in the universe as two sorts those
that move (have motion) and those that donít. In physics we know
already that this is in error; there isnít anything in the
universe, anywhere, that is motionless. At least it is moving
through time, which is still a special kind of motion. Also, we
know that everything seems to be made up of much finer things,
and these finer things are always in motion - often very violent
motion. So what we observe as a passive thing - sitting still
spatially, so to speak - is made up of subthings in violent
motion spatially. And the whole system that is not moving
spatially is still moving in time. However, we donít see "time"
but just space; therefore we see the thing as "motionless."
However, the "motionless" thing we look at is rather like a
fixed whirlpool in a swiftly flowing river the whirlpool seems
to us to stay "fixed" and motionless, but internally its parts
(the flowing water) are in constant motion.
Another example is a container of gas under pressure - such as
the air tank at the service station. The tank and "the air as a
whole spatial volume" isnít going anywhere, and we see them as
"motionless." But inside the gas its molecules are in violent
motion, undergoing collisions, etc. Indeed, inside the walls of
the tank, the molecules and atoms are in vibrational
back-and-forth motion in a spatial lattice.
The point is, physically "motion" and "motionless" only apply to
the external characteristics of the object to which we pin the
label. So it represents only an overall characteristic of the
object, and does not completely describe it. In a sense
"motionless" is filled with motion, and all is motion.
In vector analysis, a scalar quantity is considered to be a
quantity that has magnitude or size, but no motion. An example
is pressure; the pressure of a gas has a certain value of so
many pounds per square inch, and we can measure it, but the
notion of pressure does not involve the notion of movement of
the gas through space. Therefore pressure is a scalar quantity,
and itís a gross, external quantity since itís a scalar. Note,
however, the dramatic difference here between the physics of the
situation and mathematics of the situation. In mathematics, when
you say something is a scalar, youíre just speaking of a number,
without having a direction attached to it. And mathematically,
thatís all there is to it; the number doesnít have an internal
structure, it doesnít have internal motion, etc. It just has magnitude - and, of course, location, which may be attachment to
However, physically, when we say something has pressure or a
scalar value, that is not all there is to it. That particular
aspect of the object or system may be scalar, but internally the
thing itís labeling can still be decomposed into subsystems or
particles or small things in violent motion. That is, in physics
the scalar quantity can mathematically be further decomposed
into an ensemble of vector quantities. Since these parts are
rushing around in all directions but the whole is not
translating through space, then obviously the sum of all those
fractional motions must be zero. Scalar pressure, for example,
can be decomposed into a myriad of opposing force vectors per
Mathematically, a vector is an entity that not only may have
magnitude or size, but is translating through space. In
we apply the vector concept to something that is moving, and/or
to position. However, when we think further, that "something" is
made of smaller things, which also are in violent motion, and
these smaller things may be swarming all over the place with
differing velocities - or even flowing at high speed in and out
of the moving "system- thing" represented by the vector. So even
here, the vector thing is a special case of an ensemble of
In the physical world, in anything - even inside a single point
- there are always infolded vector things in violent motion. We
may say that these interior critters are "hyperspatial" or
"infolded" or "virtual" or "hidden". But theyíre real and
theyíre inside the point, as seen by the external observer.
The point is this. Everything seen externally is a plenum
internally. In the real physical world, both a thing thatís
externally motionless (a scalar) and a thing (a vector) thatís
externally translating through space, are special cases of a
system whose internal parts are always in motion. If the sum of
the internal motions is zero, the external object seems to be
sitting still and motionless to us (though itís still moving
through time with - usually - uniform motion). We describe that
internal characteristic of the system as a vector zero resultant
system. Externally we may also characterize it as a scalar,
because it still possesses attributes that have magnitude.
On the other hand, if the sum of the
internal motions is not zero, but is a motion in a certain
spatial direction, then to us the external object seems to be
moving along in space. That is, it is translating spatially.
Externally it has both magnitude and direction, so we view it as
a vector. To label a thing as only a vector is to look only at
its external attributes. To label a thing as only a scalar is to
look only at its external attributes. To look at its internal
attributes, it must be recognized as a scalar and a vector at
the same time. That is, the scalar attributes must be recognized
to be composed on internal vectors.
Summing that up, physically a scalar thing is a thing that,
(1) is a vector in
time, which is hidden from direct observation
(2) externally is
just a magnitude spatially
(3) has an internal
spatial vector structure, and therefore a hyperspatial
or virtual-state vector structure
A vector is a thing in motion in a
dimension (through a frame), whether in space, hyperspace, or
time. Rigorously it is not possible to exclusively separate the
notions of vector and scalar, because any scalar, to persist, is
automatically a vector in time.
These concepts or vector and scalar are normally not nearly so
well clarified in standard physics and mathematics texts,
unfortunately. Usually discussions of this type are reserved to
obscure papers in foundations of mathematics. It may surprise
the casual student, for example, that the notions of line,
point, space, zero, length, dimension, frame, time, and
have no truly acceptable definitions. Neither do the notions of
force, mass, field, potential, etc. In fact, mathematics no
longer attempts to explain how a line can be made of points.
Instead, in foundations, it is simply stated as three
"There is a class of entities
called points. There is another class of entities called
lines. Lines are composed of points."
From a physics viewpoint, one of the
big problems with the present vector mathematics - which is
well-known not to be a complete system of mathematics in the
first place - is that the presence of a bunch of vectors that
sum to zero is just treated as a zero or absence of any vectors
at all. That is, the absence of any internal vectors at all is
made synonymous to the presence of a bunch of internal vectors
that are fighting each other to a draw. What this does is throw
away the internal energy and internal ordered structuring of the
medium - specifically, the energy of all the vector fighters
that is continually going on inside the local medium - inside
spacetime itself. Physically thatís quite wrong, and one is
throwing away exactly half the energy of the situation.
There is a very real physical
difference between a system of real vectors that fight to a draw
and so do not translate en masse, and the absence of any vectors
and vector-fighting at all. The difference is composed of stress
and its internal vector patterns - the internal energetic
engines in local spacetime and local rest mass - in short, the
energy trapped in the local medium.
Where electrical students meet this hidden problem, of course,
is in the fact that the four vector Heaviside equations of EM
are not closed. One always has to assume that one or more of the
"remaining potentials" is zero - that is, absent. So right there
all the texts and professors reduce even Heavisideís equations
to a special case of the absence of any "left-over and hanging
around" scalar potentials. As an example, that little assumption
gets rid of any possibility of the Aharonov-Bohm effect, where
potentials alone can interfere, even in the absence of EM force
fields, and produce real force effects in charged particle
systems. That is, the sole agent of the interference of scalar
potentials can induce EM changes, according to the
experimentally proven Aharonov-Bohm effect, even in the total
absence of EM force fields.
Since 1959, it has been known in quantum mechanics that the
force fields are not primary agents at all. We know that
classical EM theory is completely wrong on this. QM shows that
itís the potentials that are primary, not the force fields. In
fact, it can be shown that the E-field and B-field do not exist
as such in vacuum; only the potential for the E-field and the
B-field exist in vacuum. Feynman pointed that out, but nearly
all of his modern cohorts seem not to have recognized that fact.
Indeed, vacuum is just a conglomerate of potentials, nothing
more, nothing less. And if you just look carefully at the
definitions of force and E-field, you see immediately that (1)
force (nonrelativistic case) consists of mass times
acceleration. Therefore a force consists of an accelerated mass.
An electric force consists of an accelerated charged mass,
normalized for a unit. But it really isnít treated that way in
the EM theory, where it continues to erroneously considered to
exist as a force field in the vacuum.
At least youíve got to use the adjectives "virtual" and
"observable" to differentiate vacuum things from material
things. One can correctly state that a virtual electric force
field exists in vacuum, comprised of accelerating virtual
masses, but not an observable force field. The observable
electric force field requires, and consists of, accelerated
observable charged particles. And the only place observable
particles exist are in a physical medium, of a collection of one
or more observable particles in space.
So it doesnít take any special powers of thought to directly
show that there are some very serious, fundamental things wrong
with the present foundations of EM theory. There are lots of
other flaws in EM, such as the fall of the Lorentz force law in
modern railgun experiments. The law has always been false, but
is a sufficient approximation if the energy regime is not too
high. Peter Graneauís work is fundamental in this respect.
To sum this up another way. The present vector analysis (as
applied to electromagnetics) discards the internal, trapped EM
energy of local spacetime. Now if the internal trapped energy of spacetime varies from place to place, that is called a curved
spacetime, relativistically speaking. And when a spacetime is
curved, there is communication of energy between the internal,
infolded, virtual EM energy state and the external, translating,
observable EM energy state. Curved one way, the local spacetime
is a sink, with external energy pouring into it continually, and
disappearing from observation of the external state. Curved the
other way, the local spacetime is a source, with energy pouring
out of it continually, and appearing in observation in the
What the present vector system of EM does, therefore, is throw
out the ability to use the very strong EM force as an agent to
curve local spacetime. The very mathematics itself, a priori,
assumes and guarantees a locally flat spacetime. And in an
uncurved region of spacetime, for example, you are never going
to make an over-unity machine - a so-called "free energy"
machine that will give you more energy out than you put in -
because the application of the vector theory a priori guarantees
the elimination of any hidden sources from the local spacetime
(ST) medium. If youíre going to tap the trapped vacuum energy,
and make a so-called "free energy" device, youíre going to have
to curve the local spacetime.
That is the only way to produce a
local energy source in the vacuum, from which a current issues.
Notice that, when we put a paddlewheel in a river, we produce a
free energy device because we tap some of the energy in the
flow. But we tap a current, we do not just tap a potential per
se. The entire secret of tapping vacuum energy, to build a free
energy device, is to produce a current in the local vacuum
potential that is self- sustained, and then tap that current.
So the present EM theory throws away exactly half of the energetics of the situation involved. From time to time yet
another physicist discovers that astonishing fact, and publishes
a paper on it to point it out. Nobody does anything about it,
however, because no one has the foggiest notion of what to do.
So everybody just lets it pass and nothing is changed.
Can you give us a more concrete example of the missing half of
Yes. Suppose, for example, you
connect a voltmeter across a wall circuit to measure the
voltage. The meter needle moves against a spring with a force,
as a result of the detection made by the voltmeter. The actual
detection is an interaction inside the meterís probe which
induces conduction electrons to move. We read the needle
movement that resulted from those conduction electrons, and we
infer so much voltage. The important point is this The voltmeter
is measuring the energetics of its own internal change; it is
not at all measuring anything external. All instruments measure
only their own internal change. We infer the external thing that
interacted with the instrument to cause the internal change.
We do not measure the external
entity directly, but only the results of its interaction inside
the probe and meter. And even then, we measure only the
external, spatial-translation energy of the instrumental
interaction; we do not measure or account for the internal
energy of that interaction. To state it more precisely The
needle moved because conduction electrons accelerated away from
the instrumentís interaction area. This current flowed into a
coil and produced a force on the needle movement, rotating the
needle against a spring. At the same time, another current - a
time-reversed, phase-conjugate current - was induced in the
atomic nuclei of the atoms in the interaction area.
This "inner current" flowed
Whittaker-wise through the atomic nuclei of the instrument,
producing an equal and opposite force. [This is the mechanism
that produces Newtonís third law in the first place, as
suspected by Feynman.] So the entire body mass of the meter
recoiled slightly from an equal and opposite force, which we
just loosely refer to - and recognize as - Newtonís reaction
force. Itís there, itís real, but we completely neglect it in
our electrical measurements Usually we donít think it had
anything to do with the external entity that interacted with the
But it was a product of the same
interaction of that external "something" within the meter. Itís
equal and opposite to what generated our electrical measurement.
So exactly as much energy was produced in the "reaction force" energetics as was produced in the "external meter needle force"
part of the interaction. We only measured and accounted for half
the true energy of the interaction, or else youíve got to
discard Newtonís third law.
It follows that what actually entered into the interaction was a
system of oppositely paired forces - a stress field, which is a
scalar potential. This, of course, is consistent with our
observation that vacuum itself is pure potential. As such, it
consists of partial potentials of various kinds - itís highly
charged, and the ambient vacuum scalar potential has very high
magnitude. Remember that this ambient vacuum stress (potential)
can be decomposed into sets of bidirectional forces.
In our EM interaction, one- half of
the stress pair - the half that is the normal photon-generated EM force was utilized to move the conduction electrons, involving
primarily the electron shells of the atoms imbedded in the
vacuum potential. The other half of the stress-pair interacted
with, and moved, the atomic nucleus, causing it to recoil. The
recoil of the nucleus was slight, because it is very, very much
heavier than the accelerated outer electron.
To sum it up
All detection is actually binary, itís not singular at all.
When we detect photons or EM waves, we normally account for only
the externalized translation part of the energetics of the
interaction. We miss or neglect the internalized translation
part, and we miss or neglect precisely as much internal energy
as we account for externally. Again, Iím not the first one to
point this out by any means.
Can you give us a precise summary statement of all this?
At the interaction area, a part of
the instrument and the external causal agent are coupled
together as a compound system. In that area, the mass of the
instrument exists as atoms, each of which has an inner part (the
nucleus) and an outer part (the electron shells). In the
coordinate system centered on that compound system, conservation
laws apply. The compressive stress of the interaction reacts
internally - i.e., against the atoms with their inner and outer
parts. Reaction from the nucleus induces a tensile stress. This
tensile stress, in the simplest case, can be decomposed into
equal and opposite forces, since stress is merely a set of such
equal and opposite forces.
One of the bidirectional interaction
forces moves externally out of the atom via the electrons,
electromagnetically producing a conduction electron current
through the instrument and giving a needle reading. The second
bidirectional interaction force moves ever inward, since it is a
phase conjugate and reconcentrates inward ("crawfishes") rather
than scattering outward. This forms a hidden Whittaker current
through the atomic nuclei, producing a recoil on all of them.
Precisely as much EM energy went into the inner system as went
into the outer system. But we normally only measure and account
for the external energy, and ignore the energy in the internal
Can you give us a reference related to this, for example?
Iíll give you several of them that bear directly on this. See R.
Chen, "Cancellation of internal forces," American Journal of
Physics, Vol. 49, No. 4, Apr. 1981, p. 372. Chen gives a
discussion of these summation vectors and internal vectors. He
points out that the internal forces occur in equal and opposite
pairs; in other words, as internal stresses. Thatís certainly
pointing out the internal, bidirectional force structure of a
scalar stress - a scalar potential, if weíre talking EM stress
and EM forces. Note that this internal pattern is exactly what
Maxwellís quaternion theory captured and retained, and that the
Heaviside and Gibbs vector theory discards. Further, the quaternions captured the internal order of this internal force
vector structure as well. Second, in a beautiful article Kidd
bluntly states that all our measurement/detection is really
binocular. See Richard Kidd et al, "Evolution of the modern
photon," American Journal of Physics, Vol. 57, No. 1, Jan. 1989,
E.T. Whittaker, of course, wrote the
definitive engineering methodology of how to do all this with EM
waves - how to infold the EM waves into a bidirectional wave
structure that produces a standing wave of externally
force-field-free scalar potential. The two Whittaker papers are
(1) "On the partial differential equations of mathematical
physics," Mathematische Annalen, Vol. 57, 1903, p. 333-355; and
(2) "On an expression of the electromagnetic field due to
electrons by means of two scalar potential functions," Proc.
Lond. Math. Soc., Series 2, Vol. 1, 1904, p. 367-372.
Now these hidden internal wave structures exist in all scalar
potentials, whether they are electromagnetic or not. For
example, Ziolkowski has pointed out what is actually Whittakerís
1903 infolded bidirectional planar waves inside the acoustic
scalar wave, in work on acoustic missiles. Acoustic missiles are
slugs of very strong sound energy that stay together in a slug
as they travel, and strike a target a terrible blow, just as if
it were a "missile made of sound energy." [See Richard Ziolkowski, "Localized transmission of wave energy," Proc. SPIE
Vol. 1061, Microwave and Particle Beam Sources and Directed
Energy Concepts, Jan. 1989, p. 396-397. Ed.]
A Soviet scientist, Ignatovich, has
pointed out the same remarkable bidirectional wave structure
inside the scalar potential associated with the Schroedinger
wave equation itself. [See V.K. Ignatovich, "The remarkable
capabilities of recursive relations," American Journal of
Physics, Vol. 57, No. 10, Oct. 1989, p. 873-878. Ed.]
And Iíve pointed out a mechanism by
means of which you can make a quantum potential, so that
separate things - even widely separated - can interact as if
they were all pieces of the same system, and all located
together at the same location. Further, Iíve pointed out that
you can deliberately structure that quantum potential with a
Whittaker bidirectional wave structure.
Can you make that last part a little simpler?
What that means is that in QM, thereís a special kind of
potential you can make, that can connect spatially separated
things and translate energy between them, in hidden fashion and
essentially instantaneously. This "connection at a distance"
directly results in action-at-a-distance. Iíve advanced the
mechanism for making one of these quantum potentials, so it is
subject to laboratory test. Further, in that artificial quantum
potential you make, you can put in a hidden EM wave Whittaker
structure - hidden "pipes inside spacetime" itself, so to speak.
Then you have established hidden EM-wave-energy channels through
spacetime, connecting widely separated entities together.
You can then put energy and specific
energy patterns - vacuum engines, if you will - directly through
those hidden channels. You can have the hidden energy emerge at
a distant point and interact in and on a distant physical system
there. This distantly-emerging interaction energy can be
positive (disordering, or scattering) or negative (reordering).
Transmitting scattering energy, you get distant heating - the
production of heat energy at a distance. Transmitting reordering
energy, you can extract energy from the distant object or system
through those hidden channels, accomplishing distant
The other thing to note is that EM energy transmission through
the hidden channel is not limited to the speed of light. The
speed of light refers to energy transmission through 3-space,
and the internal channel refers to energy transmission around
3-space, or in other words, through hyperspace. And itís
testable on the laboratory bench.
Are you saying that real energy can be transmitted faster than
the speed of light?
Yes. But hyperspatially. Not through
3-space, but "around" it.
Again, this means that itís possible to produce energetic
changes in a distant system at a distant place, without
transmitting energy "through space" in the normal sense. You
transmit "around" space, so to speak, and directly in time or
through a higher dimension, depending on the model youíre using
to understand this. Further, the speed of the internal EM energy
transmission is not limited to the speed of light. Whittaker
already specifically pointed this out. Quantum mechanics also
predicts instantaneous action-at-a- distance and has essentially
proven it experimentally.
Finally, you can specifically
Whittaker-engineer this "hyperspatial" transmission, if you
will, to do essentially whatever you wish to do in that distant
system. It all depends on how far you develop the technology;
the basis is there. Hypothetically, you can eventually even
develop a kind of teleportation. Whittaker transmission through
the internal channel is already "teleportation" of energy, so to
Does this have anything to do with
A: Yes indeed. Sheldrakeís morphogenetic field is
pure-and- simply a species quantum potential, created amongst
the members of a species. As experiences are met by the
individual members, they steadily input infolded EM structures
into the "inner" EM channels of that quantum potential. Since
any infolded EM wave has its phase conjugate - or time-reversed
replica - produced and infolded automatically, a sort of
"negative feedback" corrective EM signal pattern for all inputs
of the bad external EM stuff exists inside the quantum
potential. One can show that, for detrimental changes to the
speciesí members, time reversal provides infolded signals that
represent an exact counter to the "overstress of the species,"
so to speak.
These "corrective antidotes" for the
overstressed species, however, are in the virtual state. But as
more of the same detrimental changes are experienced over
generations, the countering signal structures residing in the
species quantum potential will be increased over the same period
of time. Gradually the hidden EM structure - which is like
jillions of little "vacuum engines" - is changing and internally
structuring the Schroedinger potential for that species.
Then one day the internal corrective charge is sufficient to
breach the quantum threshold. One could also say that the
spacetime potential occupied by the species members is now
sufficiently curved and structured to serve as a specific-
signal-pattern energetic source for genetic change. Breaching
this threshold causes specific new genetic changes to occur in
the entire species in a single jump. At that point, the actual
genetics of egg fertilization (conception) is altered, and
shortly thereafter members of the species start being born with
the new change, specifically designed to counter or partially
counter the former detrimental aspects in the species
overstress. In a dramatic example, thatís how a reptilian
species can "suddenly" develop light, air-filled bones;
feathers; and wings, for example, and change from a reptile to a
bird in one single jump. Sheldrakeís morphogenetic field is a
species quantum potential and the charged-up Whittaker structure
is the inducing agent.
Youíre saying, then, that living
systems use this inner, hidden EM energy channel in addition to
the external energy channel that we know in ordinary external
Absolutely. In fact, the distinction
between a living system and a nonliving system is precisely the
fact that the living system deterministically utilizes the inner
EM energy channels inside Whittaker-structured scalar
potentials. And those scalar EM potentials are centered on the
atomic nuclei of atoms comprising the living systemís molecules,
cells, tissues, and mass.
How does that relate to
present brain-wave research, and measurements of brain-waves
A: It says that present research is devoted almost
entirely to measuring and pondering the surface waves in the
ocean, so to speak. The mind, thoughts, emotions, and real
living functioning systems are deeply hidden, underwater waves
in that ocean. Science will have to instrument for detection and
recording of the hidden interior energetics region, or they will
never solve the mind/brain/body problem. And without the
interior energetics, they will never understand life, memory,
personality, thought, and primary biological control, or human
You are saying, then, that this hidden internal electromagnetic
energy channel is intimately connected with the mind, life, and
Absolutely. The mind consists of
stabilized Whittaker structures inside the living systemís
bio-potential. Thoughts are a special class of changes/waves in
that overall Whittaker-structure ensemble. The personal
unconscious is a single small, localized sample of yet a greater
collection that represents even deeper unconsciousness.
The conscious mind is a serial processor - one thing at a time.
The unconscious mind is totally conscious, but it is a parallel
processor - jillions of things at one and the same time. The
serial conscious mind can only make sense of a "single slide in
the slide projector" at a time. When it looks at the unconscious
mind, it sees a multitude of slides in the slide projector
simultaneously - hence it just sees blackness, or nothing
recognizable at all.
Jungís collective unconscious, for example, consists of
archetypal infolded EM structures acting in common in an overall
bio-quantum-potential for the entire species. Gaia, the living
earth/biosphere, really does scientifically exist as a common
bio-quantum-potential with infolded living EM structures for the
entire earth biosphere. The bio- potential in a single body is
an overall quantum potential that links and joins all the atoms
and cells of the body. The "spirit" of the biosystem, if you
will, is its "living biopotential" - its living quantum
potential. We already know that a potential is everywhere
nonzero all the way out to infinity. So the spirit of the living
system is - in the virtual state - everywhere in the universe -
and everywhen as well. Itís all a giant hologram, not only in
space, but in spacetime.
The entire universe is everywhere alive, with everything. Note
that if you simply examine the "ghost forms" requirement of
quantum mechanics, this conclusion is inescapable. All life is
eternal. Nothing is ever lost.
A thought or thoughtform is just a specific, dynamic Whittaker
structure in the hidden EM channels of the biopotential.
Thoughts and thoughtforms are real. They are virtual spatially,
but they occupy one "real" spacetime dimension, time. Physics
and metaphysics share one common, nonobservable dimension time.
So long as physics continues to have time, which is
nonobservable a priori, then it also must contain everything
that is a structure or action in time. Skeptics of
parapsychology, who believe that humans are robots and the mind
is just a meat computer, just have little or no foundations
And if you get carried away by the
"observable, objective science" bit, remember that the choice of
fundamental physical units in physics is arbitrary. You can -
and itís actually been done - build all of physics from time as
the single fundamental unit. That means that you can build the
whole observable, detectable physics model out of the totally
unobservable and nondetectable. Quantum mechanics long ago
destroyed materialism for all time, but it just hasnít
percolated through the prevailing scientific dogma yet.
With Whittaker EM engineering, you can conceivably "make" thoughtforms to order, and input them directly into the mind and
longterm memory. If we view the conscious mind as a special
serial computer, we have now found where the software is - for
mind, longterm memory, and personality. As scalar EM technology
develops, we will have direct access to the software, so to
speak, for the very first time. And we will be able to engineer
it at will.
is this good or bad?
Actually itís either, or both. We are describing a set of hidden
internal EM energy structures, the fundamental mechanism for
internal EM structuring, and a tool. A tool is amoral; it has no
morality, and is inherently neither good or bad. The intent of
the user of the tool, however, may be either good or bad. So the
tool can always be used either way, for beneficial purposes or
for evil purposes. Itís the hand that wields the knife that is
moral or immoral; it is not the knife. The same cutting tool can
be used by the surgeon to heal, or the murderer to kill. Human
intent differentiates amorality into morality and immorality.
What is the biological impact of the
forthcoming new technology that directly accesses and engineers
the internal energy regime?
It will be both a tremendous blessing and a terrible curse. Itís
the most powerful tool ever conceived. By engineering the
Schroedinger equation, for example, one can theoretically
engineer physical change itself. One can actually engineer
physical reality, change the laws of nature, and determine if a
thing shall even emerge into physical quantum change at all, or
if it shall change its physical form. Mind-wise, eventually one
will be able to directly input material into the mind - whatever
is desired. Education, for example, will simply be achieved by
"loading the proper software." Everyone will be enormously
educated, by todayís standards.
That should for the first time allow
the complete alleviation of unemployment due to lack of
employable skills, for example. It should be possible to
virtually eliminate unemployment and poverty. Any sort of
disease whatsoever - physical or mental - will be rapidly
curable, simply and cheaply. It will be possible to reverse
aging and rejuvenate the person. It will be possible to regrow
limbs and straighten misshapen spines - and directly remove the
causes of mental diseases and cure them as well. Lifespan will
be staggeringly increased, without "old ageís debilitation."
AIDS, cancer, leukemia, and genetic diseases will be completely
conquered. The potential for a true golden era is upon us, for
On the other hand, it will also be possible to simply pull out a
personality-structure from a person, without his or her consent,
and insert another. Or to alter a given personality structure by
just altering and re-recording the software. This technological
possibility, of course, will certainly be noticed by would-be
egomaniacs and dictators, for it can yield the ultimate mind
control. It will also be possible to provide direct input inside
the mind, surreptitiously, from a distance and without the
knowledge and consent of the individual affected.
This can be beneficial if itís just
"instantaneous telepathy" - instantaneous communications, so to
speak, and if itís desired by the recipient. It can be highly
detrimental if it is undesirable material, or if itís a forced
internal change, or enslavement, or used to overwhelm and
destroy the mind, or used to jam the bodyís immune system,
induce virulent diseases en masse, etc. Unless the present
inhumanity of one human for another is overcome, future wars are
likely to take on aspects that stagger the imagination. In 1975
Brezhnev called these new mass destruction weapons of the future
"...more frightful than the mind of man has ever imagined." He
should know. When he made the statement, the Soviets had already
been inducing diseases in persons in the U.S. Embassy in Moscow
for nearly 30 years.
Can you explain that part about direct, forced input to the
mind, just a bit more?
Yes. It involves a characteristic of
the mind and brain that has been experimentally shown. For
example, if anything (thought, feeling, emotion, image) arises
internally in one of the cerebral hemispheres, that hemispheric
personality thinks that it did it. That is, it thinks that it
not only thought the thought, but that it also created the
thought. So if you have a hidden channel to pipe in inputs, you
can take over or implant the thoughts, behavior, and actions of
a person. Or of a very large group of persons. That alone allows
a mind-numbing direct control of behavior externally and from a
Can you really control behavior electromagnetically? Can you
give us an example?
Yes, you can control it readily and
deeply, if you develop and utilize the internalized EM energy
channel technology. As to proof, Delgado certainly has
demonstrated profound control over animal behavior
experimentally, for all the world to see, using implanted probes
and precise injection of EM signals. The Soviet LIDA machine,
using a 40 MHz carrier and complex waveforms - and actually the
hidden Whittaker-infolded EM structuring, unknown to Western
technologists - has demonstrated the ability to place a mammal -
either a human or a cat - in a cataleptic state. That state can
be induced in a few minutes exposure and then persists for some
minutes after the stimulus signal is removed. That proves that
you can profoundly alter the mental state, electromagnetically.
Perhaps the very best example is provided by the two cerebral
hemispheres in your own head, or those in a rat, or those in a
cockroach. As we know from split-brain research, each hemisphere
has a separate personality. Thatís a separate being, if you
will, to put it bluntly. Yet even though you are two beings in
one body, so to speak, you are only conscious of one being. How
is that, you might ask, since both brain halves are operating?
How do you integrate two beings consciously into one functioning
being? Such as is already done in your own head?
The answer is this. Suppose your left brain sends a signal to
your right thumb to move. While the signal is on the way to the
right thumb, the left brain also sends a replica of the signal
over the connecting corpus callosum, into the right brain half,
where it emerges inside.
[When the signal emerges inside a brain
half/mind/personality, it thinks that it itself originated it.
Thatís because it perceives no time delay between appearance of
the signal in its "transmission" section, e.g., and the
appearance of the signal in its "receiver" section.] The
ultimate definition of identity, after all, is the absence of
all distinction. The absence of functional distinction in time
constitutes the creation of identity in time. The whole arises
when and only when distinction between the parts is lost.]
The right thumb is continually communicating back to the left
brain half, telling its progress. Replicas of those return
signals from the thumb are continually being sent by the left
brain across the corpus callosum into the right brain. The right
brain thinks that it originated the thumb- move-order, and that
the right thumb is reporting its progress. The right brain
thinks it did the whole thing itself. A similar process occurs,
of course, from left brain to right brain. Each inputs to the
other, at least insofar as awareness of the order and the event
is concerned. Each thinks that it did it. In that way, there is
a loss of distinction between the parts of the functionality.
Accordingly, there is only one sense of being in the bi-system,
even though there are two separate beings.
It has also been shown that, when the corpus callosum is
severed, the two brain halves now function much more
independently. In that case, two separate personalities really
do emerge and function in one body. That also has been shown in
But arenít you actually saying that the mind and thought, then,
are not really just electrical wiggles in the brain after all?
That they are actually separate from the physical brain, and the
brain is just a special sort of tuner or "workstation"?
Exactly. The real functioning of mind, thought, memory, and
personality occurs in the infolded Whittaker bidirectional EM
wave structures of the overall bodyís scalar potential - its
bio-potential. And one of the great neural scientists has
already pointed out that mind and memory are not precise
functions of physical location in the brain.
Is there any real proof of the internal energy channel operation
of the mind, or is it just all still a theory or hypothesis?
A: The basis can be shown, and it is directly subject to
laboratory test, with a decent laboratory and a little effort.
Let me give you a very strong datum point.
There exists a rare, completely bafflingly medical phenomenon -
which has until recently been concealed - called hydrancephaly.
To the normal materialistic Western biologist, this condition is
astonishing, to say the least. In hydrancephaly, a personís
cranial cavity is filled almost totally with fluid, not with
brain matter. There may be only 5% or so of the brain in there;
typically just the small portion on the tip of the spine. The
other 95% of the brain case is filled with fluid. Yet the
individual may be as normal as you or I. Except, of course, that
x-rays of his head will astonish all the doctors. A few years
ago, for example, such a hydrancephalic individual graduated
from a university in Great Britain, with a degree in
British news actually made a video
documentary on this subject, and particularly on that
Now obviously hydrancephaly proves rather conclusively that it
isnít really the brain matter or the electrical wiggles in the
two hemispheres that constitute the mind. Those wiggles normally
are correlated with, and communicate back and forth with, the
internal Whittaker dynamics of the bio-potential. The brain is
a special communications and processing station, interfacing
sensors and processed stuff from the external world to the
Whittaker-sets, and outputs from the Whittaker-sets to the body
and cells. If just a small functioning part of this "way
station" remains fully functional, the interfacing still exists.
Can you shed any light on the functioning of the fluid that
fills 95% of the brain cavity of a hydrancephalic?
Perhaps a little bit. Thereís an interesting thing about fluid -
about water. The hydrogen bonding structure of water is
enormously complex and richly varying. Bond-structuring of
water constitutes a special kind of "neo- Whittaker"
substructure inside a special kind of potential for that
particular body of water. A glass of water, for example, has an
overall neo-potential comprised of its hydrogen bond
structuring. That water will change its internal bonding
structure if you enter the room, or if you blink your eye while
observing it. It continually adjusts to everything in its
The reason is, everything in its
environment has charges, and clumps or orderings or structures
of potential. And the internal Whittaker structures of all those
potentials overlap because the potentials overlap. Therefore the
internal bidirectional Whittaker EM waves intercommute. The
internal dynamics of the water receives inputs from the
surroundings this way, and the waterís bonding structure changes
accordingly. Weíve only known the complexity and richness of
this water structuring for less than two decades, and so far as
I know, no one else seems to be considering the Whittaker
infolded EM wave structure aspects of it.
The point is this. In the fluid inside the head of a functional
hydrancephalic, the water structuring is quite sufficient to
provide the rest of the needed "way-station two-way tuner,
processor, and transmitter-receiver." The reason is quite simple
The potential of the fluid constitutes a partial potential in
the overall bio-potential of the body. Itís like the pressure of
a mixture of gases the overall pressure consists of the partial
pressures of the component gases. The Whittaker structures
ensure intermingling and intercommunication through the internal
energy channels of the total bio-potential to all its
constituents. Therefore the water structuring of the fluid in
the head of the hydrancephalic serves - bridgewise - as a
Other supporting evidence, of course, is that quantum mechanics
experiments have essentially established action-at-a-distance
and quantum correlation.
The quantum potential, therefore, is
something real and functional after all.
And even more evidence is provided by the nature of a linear
material versus the nature of a nonlinear material. However,
that would take a book, and is just too much to cover in this
interview. Suffice it to say that a strong argument can be made
from the nonlinear characteristics and phenomena themselves,
such as production of time-reversed waves, amplification of
time-reversed waves, negentropy (re-ordering of scattering
The bottom line is that thereís certainly enough evidence to
substantially support these hypotheses, and move them from the
realm of idle speculation to the realm of "worthy for further
experimentation and development." The ultimate proof, of course,
will be when one demonstrates the actual production, recording,
and functioning of a living mind. With the internal energy
approach, that is hypothetically quite possible, and will
eventually be lab-demonstrated.
How is this related to the neurons,
synapses, and dendrite firings in the normal human brain?
The same "internal electrical structure" thing is true of the
brain and its dendrite firings, EM waves, and tiny but extremely
numerous currents and fields. Take an instantaneous snapshot of
all the dendrite firings - billions of them - frozen for an
instant. The actual pattern or structure represents the internal
state of the brainís bio-potential at that instant. Take another
snapshot a moment later. The change of the internal structuring
represents the brainís internal structuring at a new moment.
Interfering (subtracting) the two snapshots provides a delta
that represents the exact and total change that occurred in the
brain-state during that tiny interval between snapshot one and
But since thought itself is a change
in internal brain-state, then the thought patterns during that
interval must be contained in those changes. And of course a
myriad of other brain control actions are in there as well.
Commands to beat the heart, direct biochemistry of cells, etc.
To detect the internal state precisely, one now needs to
decompose that delta pattern into its Whittaker-structure
components and sort them all out.
How would one go about detecting the
internal state, to get at the actual thoughts themselves?
Well, one has rather much got involved with the standard chaos
problem. Youíve got hidden order (the thoughts) buried up in a
lot of extraneous material. In other words, youíre looking at
something statistical, and itís got several kinds of hidden
order hidden in there in what to you appears to be a whole lot
of noise. So you do something very similar to what we described
in the snapshot analogy, but apply Whittaker-channel detection
at the same time. Actually, a first step in this direction has
been beautifully done by Dr. Hunt.
She divided the external brain-wave
region into several frequency bands. (Actually, harmonic
intervals are best, per Whittaker theory.) She set up individual
detectors for all the frequency channels simultaneously. Then
she divided each of these channels in two branches one branch
straight through without a time delay, and the other delayed by
a bit, say, 6 milliseconds or so. Then she mixed all the delay
channels onto all the nondelay channels, and recorded the
superposition. And lo and behold, she got beautiful traces of
hidden chaos in brain wave activity.
The traces exhibited the standard
chaos attractors. Her magnificent work is very strong evidence
that the real activity of the mind occurs in hidden variables,
in hidden channels inside the normal "envelope/external
electromagnetics" represented by normal brain wave measurements.
Hunt has shown that there is a hidden, deterministic, dynamic
order "inside" the normal statistical EM brain activity.
Over two decades ago, a Russian scientist, S.K. Lisitsyn, obliquely
spoke of Russian breakthroughs in this area. Lisitsyn stated
that the Soviets had "broken the human brain code." He further
stated that some 23 channels were involved, reaching all the way
up to optical frequencies. However, only 11 of these frequency
channels were independent. He also mentioned that the brain
coding did not number over 44 "digits".
Now I interpret his remarks as indicative of direct application
of Whittaker theory. Lisitsyn of course did not give the
details; thatís highly classified in the Soviet Union, as
witnessed by the Petukov/Toth incident in Moscow. However, I
interpret Lisitsyn as having obliquely referred to 11
independent Whittaker frequencies - the fundamental frequency
and 10 harmonics - that are used by the brain workstation to
intercommunicate between the mind and the external
electrical/physical functioning of the organism. I interpret the
remark about 44 digits to probably mean that there are some
different independent Whittaker spectrum sets, where each
spectrum consists of the fundamental and 10 harmonics. And in
each frequency channel of a set, there are two bidirectional EM
waves - actually, an EM wave and its time-reversed antiwave
(phase conjugate replica).
Can you tell us something more about detection of standing
scalar EM potential waves?
For fundamental detection of the scalar wave, you must realize
that several kinds of detectors can be utilized. One kind is a
spatially-oriented detector, and detects spatial aspects and
changes of the scalar wave and its internal substructure. The
other kind detects variations in the local rate of flow of time,
and then the "finer time wave structure" of that variation. With
either type, the problem has two parts. Letís look first at the
First, one must detect the absolute potential at the point of
intersection. Second, in this detected potential, one must
detect its internal, infolded EM bidirectional wave structure -
in short, its Whittaker structure. An additional requirement, of
course, is that the instrument must be shielded against the
effects of spurious EM signals in the area. In short, it must be
in a Faraday cage. Even more than that, one must be able to vary
the grounding potential on the shielding cage. One must be able
to let it float, have it at ambient, or move it to some specific
A Geiger tube, for example, will usually detect a strong
absolute potential. That is, the potential increases the charge
on the atoms or molecules of the gas it contains, and at the
ionization point, the gas starts to ionize. The counter, of
course, then counts the ion discharges, whose rate is correlated
to the level of ionization, and hence to the strength of the
ionizing agent. Note that Geiger tubes do not necessarily detect
nuclear radiation; they detect ionizing radiation, regardless of
the type. While nuclear radiation is certainly ionizing
radiation, so is strong scalar radiation. Even though the scalar
wave is a standing wave, its increased level of potential can
ionize the gas in the tube. Of course, if the standing scalar
potential wave is a sine wave function of the radial distance
from the source, and the Geiger counter is at the node, it will
not read because there is no difference there from normal
ambient vacuum potential.
Note also that the so-called "microwave radiation" of the U.S.
Embassy in Moscow was detected originally with a nuclear
radiation detector - probably a Geiger counter. Pure microwaves
are non-ionizing, and would not have activated the counter.
Shortly I will have a new book out, Gravitobiology A New
Biophysics, which will explain precisely how the health changes
in the Moscow radiation were induced in U.S. Embassy personnel.
In the book we will also explain Kaznacheyevís "death photons"
and the EM induction of disease at a distance. Weíll also
explain the mechanism for producing an EM antidote signal for
any disease, known or unknown.
The problem with the Geiger counter as detector is that it only
accomplishes half the job, even when it works. It doesnít break
out and measure the Whittaker bidirectional EM wave structure of
the ionizing potential at all.
Here is a possible scheme for a better detecting system. Use two
detecting probes, some small distance apart, inside the shield.
At each probe point, use a high input resistance, very low
voltage detector - microvolts or picovolts range, normally. The
signals should then be mixed and another difference frequency
detector of similar kind utilized. Under proper circumstances,
this produces a normal EM beat frequency (via the Aharonov-Bohm
effect). The second stage of the detector can then come into
play. The beat frequency is input into a standard spectrum
analyzer, which should detect the components of the Whittaker
spectrum as modulations on the detected Aharonov-Bohm effect
The disadvantages of this detector are two-fold. One, the actual
ground potential at which the shield is biased, affects whether
or not you get a detection. Second, itís basically a very short
wavelength detector for, say, millimeter waves to waves in the
one meter band. That should be good enough for scalar
communications research, however, and the Soviets have reported
highly significant biological effects of the Lisitsyn kind at
about 2.1 millimeter wavelengths.
For longer wavelengths, one has to either have rather widely
separated instruments operating in a bistatic reception mode,
for the scalar interferometry, or else use delay- materials and
schemes in probes. Another way that can be worked out is to use
a characteristic of nonlinear materials. If a sine wave is input
to a nonlinear material, harmonics are produced. By tailoring
and choosing the materials, one should get appreciable frequency
shifting up the scale via harmonic production.
Another way is to realize that a standing scalar potential wave
can also be considered as a standing wave in the rate of passage
of time. So the presence of a scalar potential alters the local
rate of time passage.
But since it alters time flow, it
affects everything else that locally exists in time - and thatís
everything. More exactly, there is a stress effect on the rate
of flow of time. And there are certain detectable functions that
occur in detectors and solid state components, for example, that
occur because of the time stream stress changes. I cannot be
more specific, because the effects I know about here were
discovered by John Schnurer and are proprietary to him. But John
can build a detector based on this effect, at least for the
overall potential. It remains to develop detection of the EM
substructure and its spectrum, and he will have a very good
scalar EM system detector.
Other things very useful in developing detectors have been
reported by Hunt, Bedini, Beck, Howonadec, Golden, and others.
Golden particularly has a very good scalar communications
detector, and several good scalar communications transmitters.
One of his typical detector systems, for example, will perform
between 20 and 30 dB better for a given power transmitted than
will a normal communication system with high gain antennas. And,
since the detection of scalar involves outfolding the inner
energy spectrum of the Whittaker structure, a direction finder
cannot get a direction fix on the signal transmitted via the
Beck has certainly demonstrated an extremely sensitive coil of
ultrafine wire, that can often outperform the finest
superconductive quantum interference detector (SQUID). The use
of extremely fine wire - and lots of overlaying coils -
drastically reduces or blocks the radial movement of electrons
in any one point in the wire in the coil. Since thatís the way
electron current actually moves - the movement down the wire is
due to drift velocity, and certainly is not the signal - Beckís
coil effectively prevents most of the "external electron
bleedoff" from the stabilized scalar potential. Thus heís able
to block most of the external electromagnetics, and thereby
retain the inner part as well. Precisely, his coil is now using
gravitons, not photons, to a significant degree.
So the coil as the interaction area
of an instrument is able to hold and pass some of the
internalized EM energy that normally escapes into and through
the nucleus only. At the output of the coil, Beck gets EM from
this internal component that the SQUID doesnít see because it
doesnít do the escape-blocking in its interaction area.
There are other detector schemes, of course, such as holographic interferometry, but this should give you an idea of some of the
things that have to be done to perform good laboratory
measurement of scalar electromagnetics.
Could you return to your discussion of whatís wrong with present
electromagnetics, quantum mechanics, and general relativity?
Perhaps you could address them in order.
Okay. Iíve already stated the case for electromagnetics. Half of
it - the really interesting part, the internal energetics - was
discarded by Heaviside and Gibbs. By discarding the scalar
component of the quaternion, they threw out the internalized EM
energy of local spacetime and its communication with distant
spatial points. Since the localized energy density of spacetime
is essentially synonymous with gravitational potential, they
threw out the ability to turn EM force field energy into
gravitational potential energy.
They threw out the interaction and
entanglement of EM and gravitation, and wrote the
of Maxwellís theory that is restricted to the case where gravity
and electromagnetics do not interact. As a subset, their work is
perfectly okay. However, a priori you will never use their
approach - nor the applied technology that follows its
principles - to produce electrogravitation, over-unity machines,
tapping of vacuum energy sources, etc. You will never
electrically change the inertia of a body at rest, structure the
electric and magnetic flux itself, or achieve and utilize action
at a distance. And your instruments developed in accord with the
Heaviside/Gibbs EM principles will never detect or measure the
mind, thought, and emotion - for those instruments a priori
discard and ignore the internal energy arena where mind,
thought, and emotion reside and function.
And since the externalized EM energy
is scattering energy, energy once scattered will produce entropy
- increased disorder, and only the positive flow of time. And
that science and technology will never be able to translate EM
energy into G-energy and vice versa. Every system built under
its principles will be at extreme best a "break-even" system. It
will never produce more energy out than is input in. It is at
best a diode engineering technology.
What about present quantum mechanics?
Quantum mechanics has a severe foundations problem the missing
chaos, or in other words, the problem of the missing hidden
order. Let me explain how that came about. When physicists were
constructing quantum mechanics, it was of necessity a
statistical theory. They simply lifted the Gibbs thermodynamics
statistics, and utilized it as the quantum statistics.
Furthermore, Gibbs statistics was based on the theory of the
random variable; that is, the variables were considered random.
So, because random variable statistics were utilized, the QM
postulate that "quantum change is statistical" was
over-restricted to the special case of "quantum change not only
is statistical, but also is random."
The second case, "quantum change is
statistical, but can contain hidden order and be nonrandom," was
thus excluded a priori, simply because of the statistics
utilized. Now the random change hypothesis is easily falsified,
as follows If you collect large numbers of random change, the
resulting collection is still random. The next collection will
not necessarily produce the same collection at all. (In fact, if
it does, then this is prima facie evidence that the variables
are not all random.)
What this means is that, if quantum change is random, then
collections of these random tiny changes could never integrate
to provide us the ordered macroscopic universe we live in and
observe. You couldnít have a flower, or a tree, or anything, for
that matter - just total randomness. Obviously that is not true,
or else you and I do not exist and this macroworld does not
For integration of the statistical quantum changes to yield an
ordered macroscopic universe, quantum change must contain hidden
order. That is, the variables must be chaotic, not random. If
the changes are chaotic, then integration of them will see large
scale forms emerge and stabilize - which is what we actually
observe in physical reality.
So ironically, the biggest foundations problem in quantum
mechanics today is the problem of the missing chaos! Try as they
will, quantum physicists cannot find the missing hidden order,
because they continue to use the Gibbs statistics that already
excludes it. So they now know that somehow QM is wrong, and many
of them fear that this most successful of physics theories will
have to be completely redone.
David Bohm, of course, long ago pointed out that hidden
variables could contain the hidden order. Actually all of
experimental physics is consistent with his hidden variable
theory (HVT). Mainline QM theoreticians, however, shun hidden
variables (and therefore hidden order). They avoid hidden
variable theory by applying a kind of Occamís razor. They say
that Bohmís HVT seemingly predicts no new phenomena, so why
adopt it at all, or even seriously investigate it? And since
Bohm did not know how to actually engineer his hidden variables,
nothing could be found experimentally with it that could not
also be explained by the present QM.
Now this is where Whittakerís work - and Maxwellís original
quaternion theory of EM - saves the day and decisively decides
the issue. Whittakerís hidden variable theory is directly engineerable on the lab bench. Itís testable, and when applied
to quantum mechanics, it predicts hordes of new phenomena and
effects, so it certainly gets by the old "Occamís razor" saw.
When you apply Whittakerís approach to QM, again you provide
testable internal EM bidirectional wave structures to the scalar
potential, including the Schroedinger potential. Whittakerís
work allows direct engineering of quantum change itself, and
constitutes testable hidden order inside the "Gibbs statistics."
In other words, application of the Whittaker work to QM produces
a superset of QM, where the missing chaos is restored.
The postulate that "quantum change is statistical" now has three
special cases, theoretically
(1) the case where no
internal order is present, and quantum change is random
(2) the case where
some internal order, but not total, is present, and
quantum change is already chaotic
(3) the case where
quantum change is perfectly engineered and hence
perfectly ordered and deterministic
Notice that, by adding the hidden
order and the internalized EM energy, weíve now extended both QM
and EM, and unified the two on a common subset eachís
Whittaker-applied subset, which is the same subset shared by the
So how about general relativity? How does it fit in?
A similar thing also happened to general relativity, believe it
or not! Einstein unwittingly restricted general relativity to a
subset of the theory he intended to write. This over-restriction
was again an indirect result of the fundamental Heaviside/Gibbs
error in electromagnetics.
Unfortunately, Einsteinís view of electromagnetics approximated
the classical view. In classical EM theory, EM and gravitation
were mutually exclusive. That is, the strong EM force was not
usable as an agent to curve spacetime.
Therefore, as a curvature agent, Einstein only considered the
weak gravitational force due to the attraction of mass. Now the
G-force is far, far weaker than the E-force. For two electrons,
for example, the attractive G-force between them is on the order
of only 10-42 times as strong as the electrical repulsion.
The G-force is very, very weak! If only the weak G-force is
considered for curving spacetime, then there will never be an
observable spacetime curvature, except in the immediate vicinity
of a very large mass - such as on the surface of the sun or a
Einstein reasoned that the laboratory, and the
observer/scientist and instrument, would never be on the surface
of the sun or of a star. Therefore, he reasoned, the local spacetime -- where the lab, the observer, and the instruments
are -- would never be curved. The local spacetime would always
Unfortunately, Einstein then made a fundamental error. He overgeneralized his thought examination. He stated one of his
fundamental postulates of general relativity as "The local spacetime is always flat." This is overly restrictive, and did
not follow from his thought process. His postulate can be more
accurately stated as follows,
"The local spacetime is always
flat, whenever only the weak gravitational force is used for
the agent of curvature and the local region of interest is
not near a large collection of mass."
Notice the difference in the two
statements of the postulate. Einsteinís overstatement does not
allow the far stronger EM force to be used for curvature. In
effect, his own overstatement excluded electromagnetics from
curvature unity with gravitation, in his own general relativity
theory. Ironically Einstein then tried for the rest of his life
to fit electromagnetics back in there - never realizing that his
own too-strenuous statement of the flat local spacetime
postulate doomed all his efforts to failure.
On the other hand, the corrected statement of his postulate
admits the following corollary,
"When a very strong force such
as the electromagnetic force is used for the agent of
curvature, the local spacetime may be curved, even though
the local region of interest is not near a large collection
As can be seen, Einstein unwittingly
wrote only a subset of his intended theory. Correct restatement
of his overstated postulate of uncurved spacetime dramatically
extends general relativity, and unites it with electromagnetics
in a unified field theory.
Einsteinís error also excluded the present general relativity
from ever being a laboratory experimental science. If no
detectable spacetime curvature is available locally, it
obviously canít be measured in the lab. The vanishingly small
local curvature waves following from mass-attraction
gravitation are still predicted to be several orders of
magnitude below the ability of the finest available detector.
And that detector is a huge, monstrous, very costly thing. A
priori, if the observerís local spacetime is always flat, there
is no local experiment or local apparatus that involves or
yields a curved local spacetime!
Unfortunately, Einsteinís modern followers have raised
Einsteinian general relativity to a dogma. They ruthlessly
uphold the overstatement of the flat local spacetime postulate.
Physicists who would dispute it - and quite a few would do so -
are essentially barred from obtaining funding. If they persist
with their heresy, their scientific stature is lost, and they
are ostracized and cut off economically. Simply read Santilliís
book, if you wish a clear inside picture. Contrary to the
scientific propaganda, orthodox science is ruthless in defending
its doctrine against all would-be heretics. Much of science has
been converted to a religion, instead of a science.
Any person knowledgeable of
scientific history can cite numerous examples of scientific
suppression, character assassination, and essentially
Gaussís nonlinear geometry
Mayerís discovery of the conservation of energy
Ovshinskyís amorphous semiconductors
the clinical use of hypnosis come readily to mind...
Scientists form a distribution, just like any other group.
Some of them are saints. Some of
them are devils. The broad majority is neither, but is made up
of just ordinary people like you and me, doing a specialized
job. Every scientific model is known to be falsifiable and
imperfect in the first place, if you believe
Scientific method does not yield total truth anyway, by its own
assertion; at best it yields a partial truth. By the Heisenberg
uncertainty principle, every measurement distorts the entity
with which the instrument interacts, changing what actually
appears to be measured. Real scientists know that scientific
models are progressive. For any model, sooner or later a better
one, an improvement, will be found.
At any rate, when one looks at Maxwellís quaternion theory, the
scalar component captured the ability to enfold and utilize the
strong electromagnetic force to make a trapped potential filled
with a structure of dynamic EM vector energy. However, if the
translation components of the quaternion were zeroed, the system
of trapped spatiotemporal energy did not translate spatially,
but only temporally. That, of course, is a scalar EM potential
without an external force-field gradient. Since it is really
trapped energy that gravitationally attracts other trapped
energy, then all potentials are gravitational - as is
In fact, in 1968 Sakharov pointed out that gravitational field
is not actually a primary field of nature. Instead, itís always
a conglomerate produced from other fields. If his hypothesis is
true, then to the first order gravity should be composed of
electromagnetics, since itís the strongest force we normally
will be able to meet or utilize.
Maxwellís quaternions and Whittakerís profound two papers
directly show that. They also show how to engineer all this on
the laboratory bench. So the Whittaker scalar EM approach is
testable, which meets the major criterion for the difference
between a hypothesis and a theory. Any decent university physics
and/or electromagnetics staff who put their minds to it can test
Are there other physicists or scientists to whom we should also
give credit for these things?
Yes. Iíd like to mention that
Nikola Tesla experimentally
discovered the standing scalar EM potential wave on the night of
July 3-4, 1899, in his Colorado Springs laboratory. He found it
being radiated from a traveling thunderstorm. He recognized it
as an "electromagnetic sound wave". This was four years before,
unknown to the world, Whittaker wrote and published the precise
theory for that same electrogravitational wave. Tesla always
stated that, in the remarkable systems he later referred to, he
was not using Hertzian waves. Rather, he pointed out, he was
using EM sound waves - which must be modeled longitudinally.
Today we know Tesla was correct - and all his detractors were
Iíd also like to point out the patents and work of Hooper.
Hooper seems to be the only physicist who ever methodically
investigated EM stresses, structuring of those stresses, and the
gravitational implications of those stresses in the laboratory.
Iíd like to also point out Sakharov, and honor him for his clear
statement that gravitation is not primary, but is a
conglomerated field made from other fields. One should also
point out the explosive progress made in stochastic
electrodynamics as a result of Sakharovís suggestion, by
Hal Puthoff and others. And one should definitely honor scientists
such as Peter Graneau, who have struggled to point out the
foundations problems of electromagnetics and experimentally back
up their findings.
And finally Iíd like to mention that Iíve been privileged to
work with some extraordinary inventors. In deference to their
requests, I will not give a straightforward list of them at this
time. But a great deal of any insight I may have gained is in
large part due to painstaking, maddening, persistent experiments
they have done in the thousands. We will have more to say - and
powerfully - about their actual contributions at a later date,
hopefully later this year. Lots of other brilliant inventors -
Moray and Sweet come readily to mind - have also struggled in
this field and produced astonishing and unrewarded results.
Can you spell out again what effect excluding the internal EM
energy had on physics, as simply as possible, and how that is
related to vectors?
The thing that casting out the
internal order and internal structure of the local ST does, is
to remove any consideration of hidden, deterministic variables
that could be manipulated to create and control quantum change
As can be seen, then, in the physical world scalar quantities
are very often really zero vector systems, where the "scalar" or
motionless system is actually filled with hosts of smaller
"vector" things in violent motion. We have to be very careful,
therefore, when we apply mathematics (which does not decompose
fundamental scalars into vectors, or identify them as vector
zeros) to a physical situation. To use an extreme example, two
elephants pushing strongly head-on against each other may
produce a "two-elephant" system of opposing forces (vectors),
where the system is stationary.
The system is thus a zero resultant
vector system, whose motion is represented by a vector zero. The
same would be true for two fleas pushing against each other and
not moving as a system; the system would be a zero resultant
vector system, whose motion is represented by a vector zero.
And hereís where the mathematics betrays us, if accepted
unQuestioningly. In vector analysis, all vector zeros are
identical. Here we are saying that the translatory motions of
the flea system and the elephant system are the same. Thatís
true, but thereís a whale of a lot of difference in the two
systems that must be accounted for physically! If you donít
believe that, put yourself in between the two pushing elephants,
and see if thatís the same as being between the two pushing
fleas! Youíll certainly notice a lot more stress on you from the
elephants than from the fleas.
That illustrates a fundamental problem with vector analysis. In
the concepts of the math itself, one conceives a "vector space"
as a sort of "place where one can put vectors." Further, no
matter how many vectors we put in there, or how they interact,
the vector space itself is never under any stress. In other
words, in that space, elephant-pushing and flea-pushing are
identically the same. And thatís the problem. When vector
analysis is applied to physical situations, imbedded inside the
mathematics of vector analysis itself is the absolute discarding
of the stress of local space or spacetime, resulting from the
interaction of vectors representing interacting motional
Now in quaternions, that is not the case. Quaternions that
interact capture this "local stress of spacetime" and "locally
trapped energy of spacetime" in the scalar component, inside it.
When the motional parts of interacting quaternions produce a
motionless or translationless state for the interacting parts as
a system, the stress, energy, and exact geometric patterning of
the interactants that are now locally trapped in spacetime is
gathered in and accounted for. The motional aspect may go to
zero, but the scalar aspect will capture not only magnitude but
internal motion and the exact dynamic structure of that internal
Quaternions already incorporate a beautiful hidden variable
theory, analogous to Bohmís beautiful work. They incorporate two
channels the external energy channel (which is addressed, for
example, by classical Heaviside/Gibbs EM theory), and also a
hidden internal energy channel (which is not addressed by
Heaviside/Gibbs). Quaternions also incorporate hyperspatial
aspects, since they are an extension to complex number theory.
Notice that Heaviside had to stick back in complex numbers, to
get his spatial vectors to unite magnetism and electricity. So
he essentially added one extra dimension, typified by the first
hypernumber, the square root of minus one. Quaternions already
had that in there, and a lot more that Heaviside threw out.
Would you sum up how general relativity, electromagnetics, and
quantum mechanics are unified by the Whittaker approach?
Yes. Applying Whittakerís work to each of the three, a superset
of it is produced. The new superset has two subsets the present
discipline and the extension containing internal EM energy and
hidden variable theory. Since all three extensions are actually
the same thing, then all three supersets superpose on the common
Each of the present three
disciplines is revealed to be a special case, which
unfortunately omitted the unifying extension set. Itís like a
topless cardboard box that youíve cut the bottom out and
outfolded the sides separately. To be joined, those separate
sides need the bottom of the box. Whittaker provides the bottom.
And itís testable.
Are there any other fundamental things from all this that youíd
like to point out, that you havenít mentioned, that follow from
the eventual development of this new physics?
Several. Please notice that Whittakerís work and the
characteristics of Maxwellís scalar component of the quaternion
allow the direct electromagnetic engineering of the vacuum. In
fact, they allow the actually structuring and variation of massless electric charge flux itself. Now, in the new approach,
one electron can be quite different from another, because its
electric charge flux can be varied and patterned. Not only can
its overall electrical charge be varied, but its charge can be
dynamically structured. Now the charge of an electron or other
fundamental particle can vary, and the charge flux of a single
particle (or a group) can be spatially structured - or
The activation concept, for example, allows an immediate and
testable explanation of the mechanism by means of which
homeopathy works. Recall what I said about water structuring and
hydrancephaly. A chemical compound has a deterministic infolded EM Whittaker structure. If you make a solution of the compound,
you change this hidden internal energy structure of the fluid.
If you then get rid of the physical carrier - the mass of the
original compound - and just leave the inner energy structure
for that compound, you have homeopathy.
Chemistry is totally due to charge
and charge distribution. In
homeopathy youíre retaining the
charge template in the potential, and that affects charges in
the treated body just like the actual medication. In fact
better, because you now do not have the "physical residue" to
worry with, but do things directly. These new concepts are
profound and controversial changes to the present foundations
assumptions of physics and biology.
In the new approach, you canít just automatically apply random
variable statistics. You have to apply chaos. In structuring the
vacuumís virtual photon exchange with the mass of a charged
particle, we have moved to a completely new and much more
fundamental level of engineering. Now the massless virtual
particle charge flux can be activated with a particular dynamic
structure - a vacuum engine, if you will - to perform a special
job. Or we can activate a local spacetime itself, curving it and
internally structuring that curvature to our will.
That locally curved spacetime then
becomes a continuing, inexhaustible source of a specialized
vacuum engine or engines. We can tailor the local vacuum so as
to be able to violate any and all of the present conservation
laws, not just two out of three as the present CPT theorem
permits. Literally we can use the vacuumís incredibly powerful
flux to produce localized vacuum engines. We can reach directly
into the atomic nuclei with magic, gentle, accurately controlled
We can for the first time begin to do actual tailoring and
engineering of the nucleus itself. We can further directly
collect and integrate virtual state energy forms, which in QM
are called "ghost forms." Literally, eventually anything at all
can be materialized and brought into physical reality, or
dematerialized so as to disappear from physical reality. And we
shall be able to engineer and change the local laws of nature,
since we can directly engineer and control the Schroedinger
equation, the quantum potentials, and the entire local vacuum
potential in all its partial potential parts.
Whether weíre ready or not, God has now seen fit to hand to
humankind the ability to engineer its own physical reality and
its own destiny. We can make of the new engineered reality a
heaven or a hell. Whichever we do, we will reap the benefits or
face the consequences. It would indeed be wonderful if, for the
first time, we could develop this powerful new tool to save
humankind rather than destroy it.