by Kenneth Richard

October 18, 2019

from ClimateChangeDispatch Website

Mainstream climate science claims CO² molecules,

"slow down the rate of heat loss from the surface" as a blanket does.

And yet the rate at which a CO² molecule retains or slows down heat loss is, at most, a negligible 0.0001 of a second.

A CO² concentration of 300 ppm versus 400 ppm will, therefore, have no detectable impact.
 

SkepticalScience, a blog spearheaded by climate science "consensus" advocate John Cook, is widely considered the explanatory guidebook for the anthropogenic global warming movement.

The blog claims CO² molecules, with a representation of four parts in 10,000 in the atmosphere (or 400 parts per million, or ppm), collectively function as a blanket does in slowing down the rate at which the human body cools. The rate or time-lapse involved in this "slowing" of heat loss is problematic to the paradigm that says CO² drives global warming, however.

Professor Nasif Nahle has mathematically assessed the rate at which heat is retained by CO² molecules.

His work was endorsed by the Faculty of Physics of the University of Nuevo Leon (Mexico).

Nahle found the "mean free path" for a quantum wave to pass through the atmosphere before colliding with a CO² molecule is about 33 meters.

Nahle, 2011a

Such a wide chasm between molecular collisions would appear to undermine a visualization of CO² functioning like a blanket does.

Even more saliently, Nahle determined that the rate at which CO² molecules can retain heat at the surface may only last about 0.0001 of a second.

Nahle, 2011b

If heat-loss is slowed down at a rate of 0.0001 of a second by CO² molecules, the atmospheric CO² concentration - whether it's 300 PPM or 400 PPM - effectively doesn't matter.

The time-lapse differential would be immaterial for either concentration.

Consequently, Nahle concludes,

"carbon dioxide has not an effect on climate changes or warming periods on the Earth."

Image Source:

Nahle, 2011a

Image Source:

Nahle, 2011b