Barcroft Images/Getty Images
Not just the big masses
of it accumulating in the Pacific, but with the tiny bits that are
blowing into pristine mountaintop habitats. The flecks showing up in
a range of
sea creatures. The specks
materializing even in human feces.
That means Prochlorococcus is also responsible for 20 percent of carbon capture on this planet (one molecule of carbon goes in, one molecule of oxygen goes out), theoretically spelling trouble for humanity's quest to keep CO2 out of the atmosphere.
This is early research
that comes with several big caveats, and also exposes the challenges
of studying a threat as new and omnipresent as plastic pollution.
Like a plant,
Prochlorococcus uses photosynthesis to manufacture its own food,
taking in carbon and spitting out oxygen, making it a lead actor in
the carbon cycle that humans have spun so out of control.
They compared the results
with a control of Prochlorococcus grown in untainted
artificial seawater.
But as they increased the concentration of the leachate, they saw the bacteria's physiological response going progressively haywire.
Lisa Moore and her colleagues were also able to measure photosynthetic activity at these different concentrations with an instrument that looks at the intensity of the cells' fluorescence.
Going further, the researchers looked at the genes of these bacterial populations, whether they were being expressed more or less in the presence of leachate.
A large portion of those being expressed less were associated with photosynthesis,
At fault could be any number of things in the plastics.
Flame retardants, for one, and other additives that give plastic its flexibility. Zinc in particular might be having an outsized effect on the bacteria - it's used in plastic components ranging from colorants to heat stabilizers.
To do an experiment like this, the researchers had to carefully control the samples of artificial seawater so they wouldn't be tainted with other contaminants that could throw off the results.
Did plastic leachates have a startling effect on Prochlorococcus in the lab? Yes, absolutely...
But that doesn't mean the effect necessarily happens out in nature.
None of this is to say that plastic isn't terrible for the planet.
Big pieces, known as macroplastics, are ending up in the stomachs of all manner of sea creatures.
And while microplastics (bits under 5 millimeters long) are everywhere, science isn't sure yet what their effects might be.
The bits that are strangling sea birds and clogging beaches and even sinking to the very bottom of the ocean.
The core of the problem is that plastic pollution is a very new science.
Researchers are still feeling their way through an environmental threat whose epicness is likely only second to climate change. Some 8 million metric tons of plastic enters the sea every year.
And between 2015 and 2025, the amount of plastic pouring into the ocean could increase tenfold.
That is objectively, monumentally terrible, but in exactly what ways it will be so, science isn't yet sure.
At least not yet.
This is humanity we're
talking about - just give us some time to make things worse...
|