The controversy over whether the SARS-CoV-2 virus has ever been
isolated or purified continues.
However, using the above definition,
common sense, the laws of logic and the dictates of science, any
unbiased person must come to the conclusion that the SARS-CoV-2
virus has never been isolated or purified.
As a result, no
confirmation of the virus' existence can be found...
common sense, and scientific consequences of this fact are:
and composition of something not shown to exist can't be
known, including the presence, structure, and function
of any hypothetical spike or other proteins
sequence of something that has never been found can't be
something that hasn't been shown to exist can't be known
impossible to demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 causes a
In as concise terms as possible, here's the proper way to isolate,
characterize and demonstrate a new virus.
- First, one takes samples
(blood, sputum, secretions) from many people (e.g. 500) with
symptoms which are unique and specific enough to characterize an
Without mixing these samples with ANY tissue or products
that also contain genetic material, the virologist macerates,
filters and ultracentrifuges i.e. purifies the specimen.
virology technique, done for decades to isolate bacteriophages 1 and
so-called giant viruses in every virology lab, then allows the
virologist to demonstrate with electron microscopy thousands of
identically sized and shaped particles.
These particles are the
isolated and purified virus.
These identical particles are then checked for uniformity by
physical and/or microscopic techniques.
Once the purity is
determined, the particles may be further characterized. This would
include examining the structure, morphology, and chemical
composition of the particles.
- Next, their genetic makeup is
characterized by extracting the genetic material directly from the
purified particles and using genetic-sequencing techniques, such as
Sanger sequencing, that have also been around for decades.
does an analysis to confirm that these uniform particles are
exogenous (outside) in origin as a virus is conceptualized to be,
and not the normal breakdown products of dead and dying tissues.
(As of May 2020, we know that virologists have no way to determine
whether the particles they're seeing are viruses or just normal
break-down products of dead and dying tissues.) 3
If we have come this far then we have fully isolated, characterized,
and genetically sequenced an exogenous virus particle.
still have to show it is causally related to a disease. This is
carried out by exposing a group of healthy subjects (animals are
usually used) to this isolated, purified virus in the manner in
which the disease is thought to be transmitted.
If the animals get
sick with the same disease, as confirmed by clinical and autopsy
findings, one has now shown that the virus actually causes a
This demonstrates infectivity and transmission of an
None of these steps has even been attempted with the SARS-CoV-2
virus, nor have all these steps been successfully performed for any
so-called pathogenic virus.
Our research indicates that a single
study showing these steps does not exist in the medical literature.
Instead, since 1954, virologists have taken unpurified samples from
a relatively few people, often less than ten, with a similar
They then minimally process this sample and inoculate this
unpurified sample onto tissue culture containing usually four to six
other types of material - all of which contain identical genetic
material as to what is called a "virus."
The tissue culture is
starved and poisoned and naturally disintegrates into many types of
particles, some of which contain genetic material.
common sense, logic - use of the English language and scientific
integrity - this process is called "virus isolation."
containing fragments of genetic material from many sources is then
subjected to genetic analysis, which then creates in a
computer-simulation process the alleged sequence of the alleged
virus, a so called in silico genome.
At no time is an actual virus
confirmed by electron microscopy. At no time is a genome extracted
and sequenced from an actual virus.
This is scientific
The observation that the unpurified specimen - inoculated onto
tissue culture along with toxic antibiotics, bovine fetal tissue,
amniotic fluid and other tissues - destroys the kidney tissue onto
which it is inoculated is given as evidence of the virus' existence
This is scientific
From now on, when anyone gives you a paper that suggests the
SARS-CoV-2 virus has been isolated, please check the methods
If the researchers used
Vero cells or any other culture
method, you know that their process was not isolation.
You will hear
the following excuses for why actual isolation isn't done:
1 - There were not enough virus particles found in samples from patients
2 - Viruses are intracellular parasites; they can't be found outside the
cell in this manner.
If No. 1 is correct, and we can't find the virus in the sputum of
sick people, then, on what evidence do we think the virus is
dangerous or even lethal?
If No. 2 is correct, then how is the virus
spread from person to person? We are told it emerges from the cell
to infect others.
Then why isn't it possible to find it...?
Finally, questioning these virology
techniques and conclusions is
not some distraction or divisive issue.
Shining the light on this
truth is essential to stop this terrible fraud that humanity is
For, as we now know, if the virus has never been
isolated, sequenced or shown to cause illness, if the virus is
why are we
wearing masks, social distancing and
putting the whole world
Finally, if pathogenic viruses don't exist, then,
what is going into
those injectable devices erroneously called "vaccines," and what is
This scientific question is the most urgent and
relevant one of our time.
We are correct.
The SARS-CoV2 virus
does not exist...
Sally Fallon Morell, MA
Dr. Thomas Cowan, MD
Dr. Andrew Kaufman, MD
Click here to
see this statement on Dr. Kaufman's website and join
our list of supporters