Eagles Unchained - Part 1b - Development of the Lotus Protocol

LOTUS PROTOCOL SECTION 2

"I believe that the scientists, including Margulis (but no mistake I have great admiration for her work), are too busy focusing on the newer biochemistry, then jumping from one foot to another in the search for the closest present biochemical counterpart, all the while praying that Gregor Mendel will justify their beliefs with results of Polymerase Chain Reaction. I have been guilty of the same.

As little as two years ago I would have presented the following, in reaction to the above allegation:

"I would posit that it remains entirely possible that a completely different variety of eubacteria may have been the precursor (of mitochondria) and that the present likeness in biochemistry is the result of elimination of redundancy: that we are presently looking at the vestigial biochemistry of a variety completely different than what we would associate to present examples; that the present physiology of the mitochondrion has no present counterpart, or perhaps it (the unknown organism) may be the precursor of more than one of today’s phyla (and the mitochondrion).

To make matters worse, the protocists envisioned for study may have a more complicated history than the promitochondria. What their past incorporation of endosymbionts will mean to their present behavior is largely unknown. For these reasons, various bacterial types will be tested against various protocists, and we’ll look for patterns in their responses. As we were able to find patterns involving the oxygen and salinity content and selective incorporation of either a cyanobacteria or a respiring one, we may indeed find such patterns involving the retention of such varieties. Should such patterns develop (and they may do so over a wide span of bacterial and protoctist types), we would then correlate to the known paleobiology. At the end of the day, we’ll relate back to the biochemical sequencing and use it with a purpose that doesn’t put the cart before the horse: verification of relation and redundancy elimination.

Some scientists are still trying to build a cell from an atom (their biochemistry), and are unable to do so. We’ll take a little more humble approach: ask the cell questions and maybe it’ll tell us a little about why it is the way it is. It is also entirely likely that we may find that the selectivity under the aforementioned criteria (salinity variance and oxygen infusion) breaks down when studying potential endosymbionts. There may be no such defined patterns under that criteria. This may mean that our selection criteria was off, that the current endosymbionts somehow preclude further relationships, or that the precursor(s) of mitochondria (and possibly chloroplasts) are something totally different, something completely (forgive the term) "alien" to today’s world."

In this 1999 quote, taken from my personal diary, I argue with myself (while committed to the evidence of endosymbiosis) about the next phase in research from Fresh-Brackish-Marine (FBM), results from which have been previously communicated and will be moderately restated in a few moments. The thought begins with the idea that similarity between mitochondria and eubacteria may be a function of an elimination of redundancy between the endosymbiont and host, then ends (after an overly verbose passage...nothin’ unusual there!) with the notion that a present day counterpart to the original endosymbiont may not exist. The idea stream was built upon the mistaken thought that there existed nothing special at the point of apparent random food selection, 0.031% marine salinity at +/- oxygen infusion. "Mission Genesis" was to follow, carefully noting retention times and parameters altering phagocytic responses.

Did the 0.031% data mean nothing more than a cold number solute divided by 100? No. It turns out that there exists a relationship between 0.031 (conversely as the fractional solute equivalent 0.00031) and the Sequence of Fibonacci

(Reference to mathematical theory:

TARGET="_new"> <http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/R.Knott/Fibonacci/Fibnat.html;

"http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/R.Knott/Fibonacci/Fibnat.html;</A> with associated links).

That is 0.031 is 5.0161812% (notice 5.0"1618"12) of the 0.618 "phi" (lower case "p") number (i.e. nearly exact 1/20). Of course, we know that "Phi" (the geometric golden section; Phi exp2=Phi + 1) is related to Fibonacci "phi" as {(sqrt 5 + 1) / 2} is to {(sqrt 5 -1) /2. Further, the geometric import extends to "pi" via James Gregory’s work (extension from Euler). As we are all students of the sciences here, I need to proceed no further (yet) having to do with the natural import of this relationship. Is there a "real relationship" between the FBM findings and the natural sequence to geometric convergence, you may ask? Well, as you have read this far, there had better be, right? Become VERY RESTLESS, as the relationship does exist! A very careful scrutiny of the FBM (0.091%-1.001% marine salt salinity, inclusive) demonstrated some interesting points of data dispersion, each worth expressing in an assigned category.

(As this is a proposal for furtherance of study, and as the original FBM results are in front of you, no need here to rehash the standard deviations, "t", "chi square" and "F" scores.)

With this description, the standard "hour-glass" plot shape should be kept in mind. In addition to the point of selection randomness, found at 0.031%, areas of high data-plot dispersion are found in the results. These areas demonstrate high scatter plot dispersion (away from the smooth plot lines and pulling the curve fits toward 100% and 0 % option selection).

They (the dispersion points) appear as circular foci of data, with the density of same decreasing as the distance from the foci centers increase. The foci plot bilaterally symmetric to the centerline (point of randomness). The points of salinity, independent of oxygen regimen (Also important!) are at 0.019%, 0.024%, 0.030%, 0.040%, 0.047%, 0.058%, 0.060%, 0.069%, and 0.076%. Further data dispersion is found after 0.091%, however; I believe that once the aforementioned numbers are interpreted, it will suffice for the purposes of this protocol.

Statistical significance of the dispersions were verified. (See the FBM results under "Errant Data".) A cursory inspection of the percentages revealed nothing. It was not until the percentages were grouped, that meaning developed. Additionally, as statistical significance is demonstrated both within and between groups (but see the 0.076% analysis of foci differential), the ultimate interrelationship (found after group "Descriptions" and before the "Predictions" section) is easily observed."

Cpt. Danny B Catselas Burisch, Ph.D. (U.S.M.C., Ret.)
END PROTOCOL SECTION 2

Go Back

LOTUS PROTOCOL SECTION 3

"Group One (The Golden Mean Group): 0.019%, 0.040%, 0.058%, and 0.076% Group Two (The Viral Code Group): 0.030% and 0.060% Group Three (The "Hypersea" or Geologic Timeline Group): 0.024%, 0.047%, and 0.069%

DESCRIPTIONS:

Group One (The Golden Mean Group)-
Each of these points has a direct relationship to the Golden Mean and the Ratio Convergence Sequence of Fibonacci as we see that the point of randomness

(0.031) multiplied times that convergence sequence (0.618) equals 0.019 (1st. Percentage in this group, with rounding).

Extending: 2 times (0.031 times 0.618) = 2 times 0.019 = 0.038 (2nd. Percentage in this group was 0.040).

3 times (0.031 times 0.618) = 3 times 0.019 = 0.057 (3rd. Percentage in this group).

4 times (0.031 times 0.618) = 4 times 0.019 = 0.076 (4th. Percentage in this group).

Interpretation:

With the understanding that salinity oscillation occurs even under the most rigorous laboratory conditions that involve dynamic systems, we can eliminate criticism of the small within-group variance. As one of the main data target points was 0.076%, one needs to address the density of the dispersion versus the density of the data that pulled the curve fit to the smooth hour-glass plot. Analysis of this issue revealed that the dispersion foci (above and below the curve fits - depending upon whether you are speaking to the photosynthetic or the respiratory foodstuffs) were only 0.05% as dense as the other dispersion foci. (You have the early data in front of you.) The difference between 0.076% and 0.031% (the point of randomness) is 0.045%. I understand that I am in hazard of your opinions with the statement that follows, however, may I remind the readers to evaluate sacred geometry issues, as presented in

<A HREF=" <http://www.danwinter.com/orion/orionheart.html>."

TARGET="_new">

<http://www.danwinter.com/orion/orionheart.html.

"http://www.danwinter.com/orion/orionheart.html.

</A>

In that article, Mr. Winter directs attention to the Golden Spiral and Orion. Please look past the spurious references and to the issues at hand, including the presentation of "wratcheted dodecahedra and the DNA double helix." In relation to same, <A HREF=" <http://www.meru.org> TARGET="_new"> <http://www.meru.org"http://www.meru.org</A> should be evaluated in regard to the issue of "Continuous Creation". The information that follows will further the connection between those issues and this document.

Group Two (The Viral Code Group)-

Recent research has shown that the human genome may contain as much as 30% from retrotransposon action. (See: <A HREF=" <http://www.panspermia.org/whatsne6.htm> TARGET="_new">



<http://www.panspermia.org/whatsne6.htm

"http://www.panspermia.org/whatsne6.htm</A>

and Moran, John V., et al, "Exon Shuffling by L1 Retrotransposition," p 1530-1534 v 283 Science, 5 March 1999.)

[A note: Please accept my disgust at the presentation of ALH84001,0 resident on the same web page. For those that claim such non-faith-based foundations to their work, they certainly seem to be interested in the concept of "resurrection." Now other SNC’s have what they (our Masonic Champions of Truth and the American Way, NASA) earlier praised as special to ALH84001,0. Hey, guys, remember your math identities? Any Real Number multiplied by zero = zero. 1996: 1(0)=0...time passes...2001: 3(0)=0. See? It product remained the same, "0", didn’t it? They ought to be bent over a knee and spanked!]

The original span of the FBM salinity tests ranged from 0.001% to 0.091%. 30% of the range (0.091-0.001 = 0.090) is 0.027, very near to 0.030, or 0.031%. Is this enough to firm up an opinion of definite relationship? Of course not! Let’s, however, take a close look at the percentages assigned to this group and the substrate control regimen applied in the FBM (Fresh-Brackish-Marine). Both 0.030% and 0.060% are multiples of 30% of the data range, when the data range is set at 0.100. Extrapolation fit to Brackish Low results. (See results you already have.)

Interpretation:

The evolution of new genes may have their origin in the action of Long Interspersed Nuclear Elements (L1s) as "...they insert into transcribed genes and retrotranspose sequences derived from their 3’flanks to new genomic locations...", thereby promoting the movement of non-L1 sequences. As a corollary, retroviruses are noted as having possible origin as retrotransposons. The logical movement from the argument that places retroviruses as possible evolutionary outcasts to the plausible creation of the eukaryote genome by a retrovirus (or multiples of same) is not difficult. Of course, if one has an argument for the exclusivity of the direction of retrovirus creation or an effective discourse could be made against the idea as teleology, in the wake of this study, please present it. It is well defined that the eukaryote genome can carry endogenous retroviruses, given its intrinsic structure (Sverdlov, Eugene, "Perpetually Mobile Footprints of Ancient Infections in Human Genome", p 1-6 v 428, Federation of European Biochemical Societies - Letters, 22 May 1998).

This issue received further treatment in "Our Retroviral Heritage" by Clive Patience, et al (p. 116-120 v 13 n 3, Trends in Genetics, March 1977), and opens the possibility that the current genomic complement from such may contain as much as 40% (for mammals only; Wilkins, John, 8 March 1999, FEBs Letters). The differential of 10% may be accounted for by more recent retrotranspositions. Given the readers, it would be improper to present basic virology.

Substrate controls were placed on the groups under evaluation, in the FBM (Please review your copy!), by applying various synthetic substrata (such as microcrystalline spheres) as well as washed natural alluvium to which the protoctists were normally accustomed. Results were NOT reproducible with any synthetic substrate or natural items (such as leaves). Only the natural substrate (independent of washing with solvents such as distilled water, saline, etc.) produced the precise behaviors. This leads us, by the nose, to an exclusive interaction between the protoctists, the foodstuff selection under salinity, and the resident substrate. Therein may lie a new paradigm of speciation."

Cpt. Danny B Catselas Burisch, Ph.D. (U.S.M.C., Ret.)
END PROTOCOL SECTION 3

Go Back

LOTUS PROTOCOL SECTION 4

(First Part of Section 4)

"You are taking the next cognitive step without need of my further leading this dance. I am postulating the interaction between a viroid-like (possibly intracisternal) particle or integrated provirus and an activating particle from natural substrate with the observed behavioral component. The extent to which the behavioral component may also be mediated by localized metabiosis remains an object for study. The high reaction cell liquid replacement, during FBM, should have precluded protoctist-protoctist chemotaxis as the source of data dispersion.

Virusoids employing RNA-dependent RNA polymerase may account for some intermediate biochemistry involving object(s) in question (should the behavior not be a direct repercussion of a DNA or RNA artifact). Another possibility may rest in the behavior being directed by an A-type Retrovirus. If the linkage exists between viral origin of the genome, the observed periodic behavior, and an A-type retrovirus; I would posit same to be mobilized and hiding as a retrotransposon within the "active" regions of the genome, with such retrotransposon having relation to ultimate species diversification (see available literature on 16S rRNA divergence).

All 22 varieties of holozoic protoctists demonstrated like data dispersion. Given control results of randomized food intake by the engulfers, within their normal microhabitat, genomic complement (together with some type of substrate interaction) is believed responsible for reaction to marine salinity pressures. No studies have been found, relating to reactions to salts present in marine water, that will accommodate the data. Studies of grazing data versus prey size are available, but none would account for the responses given the size parity of foodstuffs.

The combination of salts, in toto, seem to be the triggering factor at the percentages deployed. As you have already seen in the data in front of you, subcontrols using variant fractional combinations of salts did not elicit the same responses. If the periodic and reproduced results can be attributed to other factors, outside of anomalous genetic control, I would encourage response. Given the like data, across species, we appear to be looking at something generic to these eukaryotes.

Should the potential of retrovirus expression be discounted, in relation to this data, you are invited to visit and subsume the data at <A HREF="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?CMD=Display&DB=PubMed," TARGET="_new"> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?CMD=Display&DB=PubMed,</A> impeach the FBM experimental design, then challenge the postulation with vigor.

Group Three (The "Hypersea" or Geologic Timeline Group)-

If the top two groups did not promote concern for significance, the like responses at 0.024%, 0.047%, and 0.069% I hope may. Public timelines place the age of earth between 4.56 to 4.60 BYA. Some other timelines exist.

{A treatment of those other timelines and issues such as the COSMIC "D. of the C.T.P." requires a degree of control over this document that may not exist within the passage of electronic mail. So, should you wish me to play the position of advocacy against my hypothesis for the sake of argument, we would require another method of communication. Should the control authority decide that this medium is acceptable, I am prepared to proceed along that line.}

I have wondered, within the context of a possible viral genomic origin to the responses, whether some of the data may have relationship with geologic time. If, in fact, the data are representative of a complex code being projected into the present, could not the code be bound to its origin? Numerous factor combinations were tabulated against the percentages assigned to this group. 4.56 and 4.60 were multiplied against 0.618, that pesky number from above (double-entendre suggested). The result: 0.228 and 0.230. I, therefore, noted a discrete range of 0.228-0.230, with 0.229 as the mean (0.230 rounded). A view of the data dispersion points within this group reveals the foci at 0.024, 0.047, and 0.069. The FBM range is rounded to 0.100%. 0.100(0.230)= 0.023, 2(0.023)=0.046, and 3(0.023)=0.069. Set against each other in a Product vs. Data format, we have:

Product: Data:

0.023 0.024 0.046 0.047 0.069 0.069

Interpretation:

In a word: Hypersea! (See: McMenamin, Mark and Diana, "Hypesea - Life on Land", Columbia University Press, 1996.) The Hypersea hypothesis (now possibly a theory with this document) treats the upswelling of minerals from the ocean, a goddess-like extension of the ocean to new vistas. The relationship between the precise mineral components found in marine water, the behavior of the organisms under scrutiny, and the periodic response to factors involving the predicted age of the earth and natural sequences points a strong finger. Not since the binding between a creation myth and the society within which it may dwell, has such a strong nexus been attributed to life and the (eternal) ocean (our mother). This gives reason to pause. Are we hearing an echo of an evanescence of the darkness that was upon the face of the deep, or seeing the waters swarm-forth living souls?

We see, in this data, a clear artifact/demonstration of the connection between modern eukarya and the origin of the earth. Is the connection a direct function of the genomic programming to the timeline, or is it derived as a reaction of the eukaryote to other factors (relating to the age of the earth, environment, etc.) that we have not yet seen?

PREDICTIONS:"

Cpt. Danny B Catselas Burisch, Ph.D. (U.S.M.C., Ret.)
END PROTOCOL SECTION 4A

(SECTION 4B EMBARGOED FOR TRANSMISSION DUE TO THE AUTHOR’S SUBMISSION OF TEXT THAT REFERS TO DETAILS OF A RESEARCH PROJECT THAT IS HIGHLY CLASSIFIED. HE HAS BEEN REQUESTED TO PROVIDE A REDACTED REFERENCE, EXCLUDING THE DIRECT INFORMATION. HE HAS AGREED TO DO SO, PROVIDING THE REFERENCE IN THE FORMAT OF A "PUN". TRANSMISSION OF THIS SEGMENT IS DUE WITHIN 24 HOURS)

(Second Part of Section 4)

"PREDICTIONS (my humble discourse):

It is at this point that I must sue with apologetics! This is not a publication meant for the modern journals. Rather, it is something that we are encountering that requires more than the recounting of previously published material, and is to be viewed within the context of the quiet truths with which we, of the Maji, are entrusted. This is new ground, or perhaps it is a loud demonstration of very old ground.

Continued confirmation of the FBM results will require a four-tier design, two levels of which can be performed by this writer, two by more restrictive laboratory facilities.

Tier One:

"Wide Spectrum Analysis of Protocist Behavior, Over Variant Geologic Substrata, to Isolate and Confirm More Ancient Periodicities." The Experimental Design is in your possession. (Reference: Mission Genesis Design 1999, as filed and amended to the Maji, January 1999.

*Please note: The generalized design shall be sequentially repeated over the various geologic strata, with retention codes used.) The Frenchman Mountain Complex (FMC) will supply six geologic segments

( <A HREF="<http://64.4.20.250/cgi-bin/linkrd?_lang=EN&lah=1d473c30d39edf6d389f348a83e2617c&lat=983819934&hm___action=http%3a%2f%2fdatawebman%2ebizland%2ecom%2frainbowgardens%2fStrataDesc%2ehtml>)," TARGET="_new">

<http://64.4.20.250/cgi-bin/linkrd?_lang=EN&lah=1d473c30d39edf6d389f348a83e2617c&lat=

983819934&hm___action=http%3a%2f%2fdatawebman%2ebizland%2ecom%2frainbowgardens%2fStrataDesc%2ehtml>),</A>

in order that we may test somewhere between (public data) +/- 1/15 to +/- 1/16 of earth history. 1.7BYA, 570-510 MYA, 409-330 MYA, 330-245 MYA, 245-200 MYA, and less than 20 MYA.

As I am inclined to accept the clues given from the FBM, I would expect that the responses of the modern organisms to the substrate may change, as the general age of the substrate changes. Towit, I predict that responses will be revealed over the predictable range, with the oldest strata mediating behavior at a closer distance to marine salinity, moving toward a mathematical limit between 3.000% and 4.000% salinity (marine salts mixture). Using easy extrapolation, and dividing the predictions between Low, Medium, and High groups; random foodstuff selection is expected at the following salinities (in percents):

BYA (billion years ago)
LOW EXPECTANCY     MEDIUM EXPECTANCY     HIGH EXPECTANCY
1.840                                        0.194                             0.206
1.610                                        0.154                             0.162
0.690                                        0.062                             0.063
0.460                                        0.050                             0.050
0.230                                        0.040                             0.040
0.000                                        0.031                             0.031

Original interpolation was conducted at 0.230 B.Y. increments with the mean salinities factoring to the 3.000% and 4.000% with the use of original factors, Low End: 1.255 and 1.260, and High End: 1.275 and 1.276. (Complete Interpolation Available Upon Request.) As we are discussing a two-piece puzzle with evidenced predictable periods, we can postulate the devaluation of the genomic component in a similar manner. Taking the argued 30% retrotransposition as the current internal artifact (or secreted provirus particle), and accepting a predictable period (evidenced Hypersea) as an intelligent movement from marine salinity to fresh water (ultimately a movement from ocean to land), the point of randomness may be defined in relation to viral component.

Yes, I am postulating that a multivariant viral structure seeded the earth (in agreement with the now understood "unnerving details" (VERY DEEP PUN INTENDED!) encapsulating the mobius-like reality of Adam {’the’ Red Earth} within Eve {Life}, and that such viral structure purposively motivated its totipotency to produce an exemplar cellular structure, the same requiring further phagocytic behavior, as time passed, to maintain sufficient genetic diversity to mobilize the internally consistent biosphere humanity now perturbs. For purposes of further identification, the cellular component of the LOTUS (abbreviated as "L") will henceforth be termed "V" for "the VISHNU" in historical respect, after the tradition of "...the great maintainer and preserver."

(See internet citation:

<A HREF="<http://64.4.20.250/cgi-bin/linkrd?_lang=EN&lah=15a8818c916496d639bbc5c65b83d50d&lat=983819934&hm___action=http%3a%2f%2fskipper%2egseis%2eucla%2eedu%2fstudents%2frroberto%2f208%2fVishnu7%2ehtml>.)" TARGET=

"_new"><http://64.4.20.250/cgi-bin/linkrd?_lang=

EN&lah=15a8818c916496d639bbc5c65b83d50d&lat=

983819934&hm___action=

http%3a%2f%2fskipper%2egseis%2eucla%2eedu%2fstudents%2frroberto%2f208%2fVishnu7%2ehtml>.)</A>

The lithospheric component (natural state unknown) of the L will be termed "S" for "the SHIVA" in historical respect, after the tradition of "...a reproductive power which restores what has been dissolved."

(See internet citation: http://www.indiancultureonline.com/mystica/html/shiva.htm.) The communication medium (or particle{s}) will be called "G(s)" for "the GANESH" in historical respect, after the tradition of "The remover of obstacles".

(See internet citation: <A HREF="<http://64.4.20.250/cgi-bin/linkrd?_lang=EN&lah=8de60f1a5a6ad846bb1dafebf8e44f0e&lat=

983819934&hm___action=http%3a%2f%2fwww%2ehindu%2dgods%2ecom>.)"

TARGET="_new"><http://64.4.20.250/cgi-bin/linkrd?_lang=EN&lah=8de60f1a5a6ad846bb1dafebf8e44f0e&lat=983819934&hm___action=

http%3a%2f%2fwww%2ehindu%2dgods%2ecom>.)</A>

The functions and natures of that hypothesized virus-seed is the subject of Tier-2."

Cpt. Danny B Catselas Burisch, Ph.D. (U.S.M.C., Ret.)
END PROTOCOL SECTION 4B

Go Back

LOTUS PROTOCOL SECTION 5

"Tier 2: :

"Evaluate and Contrast the Possible Structure and Function of Each Half of the Lotus through Protoctist’s Variant Phagocytic Behaviors in Response to Foodstuffs of Known Genetic Composition."

In essence, Mission Genesis, as originally envisioned in 1999 is reborn. Please review the Bacillus subtilis/Spirulina platensis sequencing compendia and see the quote of previous pages, then add to it the opportunity to substrate with numerous geologic strata. Should predictable periodic progression be plausible (as with Hypersea), the percent at which random foodstuff selection is made (with original random percent being postulated at 3.500) may be hypothesized at a reduction of +/- 20 % joined viral component (L) for every +/- 1% decrease at the point which random selection is maximized. A short interpolation follows. Should the complete mathematical scheme be required, please request same.

L COMPONENT IN %

% RANDOMNESS              MAXIMUM:
100.000                                  3.500

80.313                                   2.524

60.625                                   1.549

39.844                                   0.519

30.000                                   0.031

Confirmation of the L component and the primary through quarternary structures of the V, the S, and the G(s) are the aims of Tiers 3 & 4. I leave the experimental methodology and design parameters in your hands.

[Due to the potential for destruction of a fully functional and conjoined L, it is my suggestion that any direct evaluation be conducted in biocontainment levels normally associated with potentially hazardous "foreign" materials (AKA: another name for a "Native American baby"). The vitality of the L should not be underestimated given its ability to conduct graded continuous creation/proliferative cytogenesis and the common instances of ancient DNA (aDNA) revitalization.

(See: Joint Symposium Details: Cano, R., et al., "Beyond Jurassic Park: Assessing Genetic Information Hidden in Herbaria and Archival Plant, Microbe, and Insect Specimens," American Phytopathological Society and the Entomological Society of America, November 8-12, 1998.

Further results may be located at

TARGET="_new"> <http://www.comic.sbg.ac.at/staff/jan/ancient/aDNA%20library.html.)]"http://www.comic.sbg.ac.at/staff/jan/ancient/aDNA%20library.html.)]</A>

This protocol would not be complete without a short presentation of an idea stream concerning the nature of the original L. Until confirmation/isolation occurs, please maintain my hypothetical stream as "straight-away guesses." After it (the L) is verified - you are invited to change my position as having stated I was 100% sure! (A little joke! Yes,...I know,...VERY LITTLE!)

A believed central role for the L would be its original ability to not only promote the first viable cellular structure, but also maintain its own internally consistent vitality (fit expression mechanisms) through the expanse of time. Should the search bear out this triumvirate vehicle of genesis, it is anticipated that a key to its role (over geologic time) is that it can orient a cells’ ability to adjust under varying conditions. We know that energy-dependent proteolytic systems involving multicatalytic proteases (ex. steps in ubiquitination) are central to this notion.

(See: Maupin-Furlow, Julie A., et al., "Proteosomes in the Archaea: From Structure to Function," Frontiers of Bioscience, 5, d837-865, September 1, 2000.)

Further, high turnover proteins are directly related to metabolic nodes. Such proteolytic systems are based upon "ring" structures that unfold proteins and facilitate their insertion into the appropriate catabolic processes. (Relate this also to attached scissor mechanisms on a synthetic helix.) It is this ring-associated structural basis, relating to both eukarya (now) and prokarya (now and in the Archaean) that gives us a few more clues to L structure, and possibly an originally non-endosymbiotically-based origin for mitochondrial cDNA. Viroids, usually described as naked circular pieces of infectious RNA that fold back and anneal to form stable structures, are not affected by proteases or DNAse treatment. It is only with RNAse that viroids are destroyed. What could be a better progenitor system for the aforementioned proteosomal mechanisms? You may have ascertained, by now, that we are slowly reconstructing a theoretical L, from constituent parts: the V, the S, and the G(s).

The mechanism for viroid replication is poorly understood. Known viroids need no helper function and create havoc through cellular damage. A viroid, presented to the cytosol, via the action of a retroviral provirus may constitute the postulated V. Direct therapeutical advantages have been demonstrated, in experiment, with the use of retroviruses, that assimilate into the host genome and modulate mRNA’s. As a matter of stating the required information: viral-based gene therapy is commonly practiced with retrovirus vectors as a gene induction system.

(See: <A HREF=" <http://www.bioscience.org/1999/v4/d/Klimach/fulltext.htm)>

TARGET="_new"> <http://www.bioscience.org/1999/v4/d/Klimach/fulltext.htm.)"http://www.bioscience.org/1999/v4/d/Klimach/fulltext.htm.)</A>

Should the V be a combination of such a provirus and a viroid devoid of cytopathological aspirations (pardon the personalization), Defective Interfering Particles (DIPs) may be assayed in response to cells undergoing a simultaneous environmental stressor and a coinfection by a well-established viral gene replacement vector, such as an amphotrophic or polytrophic murine retrovirus. The possible association between the resultant DIPs and the mitochondrial cDNA may still be out of reach due to packaging capacity. The produced DIPs would have to closely scrutinized. (Forgive my intervention into your Tiers.)"

Cpt. Danny B Catselas Burisch, Ph.D. (U.S.M.C., Ret.)
END PROTOCOL SECTION 5

Go Back

LOTUS PROTOCOL SECTION 6

"The conjecture of the lithospheric component, the S, leads us into the discussion of the selected respiratory foodstuff: Bacillus subtilis. This unique bacterium has had a long and very interesting relationship with human beings. (No. It was not by chance that it was picked for the original FBM study, some years ago. Yes. I had a "heads-up" on what I might find. I must, however keep that information a "Captive" of my mind and soul. You must understand, some things shared between "friends" that respect each other should remain in confidence until the "future" time is right.) Yes, what an interesting relationship! May I refer the readers to the 1941 Nazi German medical corps’ interactions with, and their subsequent approval of the gobbling of warm camel dung?

(See: <A HREF="<http://64.4.20.250/cgi-bin/linkrd?_lang=EN&lah=1f14de1c74fbd6705beb05d078105740&lat=983820074&hm___action=http%3a%2f%2fupwardquest%2ecom%2fcrit1%2ehtml>"

TARGET="_new"><http://64.4.20.250/cgi-bin/linkrd?_lang=EN&lah=1f14de1c74fbd6705beb05d078105740&lat=983820074&hm___action=

http%3a%2f%2fupwardquest%2ecom%2fcrit1%2ehtml></A>

for some light cell-mediated immune response and humoral activation folklore.)

Should that not suffice for reference, call JPL, they know just about "everything" concerning the Nazi’s, yes they do! Why, where else do you think they obtained the policy to feed faeces to people? The biological point here is this: Bacillus subtilis relates in some special manner to normal human-involved ecosystem biology. The critter has the ability to positively interact with human cytophysiology (while being taken internally), but is nominally only resident in soil. Further, I have previously theorized an association between research conducted on the YER057c/YjgF protein family (involving Bacillus subtilis biosynthetic PurA) and modulation of polycationic histone proteins binding to exterior phosphate groups on DNA (a communicating membrane transduction device, a key to extracellular control over nDNA, m/cDNA, and RNA synthesis... we’re a-talkin’ with cells! Please take a look at the theoretical transcriptions I produced at the "site". I believe the nexus here is enough, now.

If they say anything interesting involving the collective unconscious, ask them to tell my brain to let me know, okay? :) Isn’t the holographic Universe a beautiful place to be! See, also: Mission Genesis Discourse, June 2000, R4808) If we are to postulate a Bacillus subtilis type bacteria, within the strata, we would need to justify its residence. As I am sure that a dissertation on desert soil microbial community chemistry or viral absorption standards would bore you, I will continue. I would submit negative chemotaxis to ozone for the promotion of the niche, and a graded niche size relating to geophysical history. (See: Kim, J.G., Department of Food Science and Technology, The Ohio State University, "Inactivation of Bacillus subtilis Spores by Ozone in Combination with Heat or Pulsed Electric Field", 2000 IFT Annual Meeting, 78F-3.)

Although spores of Bacillus subtilis are resistant to physical and chemical assaults, the addition of ozone appeared to sensitize the spores to heat. This is relevant as we understand that the unfolding of life’s progress! demonstrates the procession from the thickest blanket of protection from ultraviolet radiation (deep ocean and deep geology) to a thinner one (euphotic, land, limnology, shallow geology, free-atmosphere and cloud-borne). Simply put, this may be an artifact of the constraint of life to its proper place at proper times. Lest we forget: the public placement of the first mutualistic endosymbiosis of that which we call mitochondria is set only 100 M.Y. after our regarding the ozone shield sufficiently thickening, and the fossil record of such as Gunflintia, Huronospora, and Leptoteichus golubicii becoming a reality.

Putting all of this together, we seem to be looking at a variety of bacteria that remains a candidate for the vehicle of the S, whether it acts as a mediator from an imbedded crystal protein, or directs relevant membrane transduction with the S being a resident item. The G(s) are to be the greatest isolation difficulty and may only be realized indirectly, by the affirmative identification of the V, the S, and the behavior between the two. It may be as simple as a shuttle system, involving an organism such as Bacillus subtilis, Bdellovibrio bacterivorus, a Wolbachia-like type, or the like. It could also be as elusive as a phantom’s whisper.

READ CAREFULLY AND SAVOR THE BUTTERY TASTE OF YOUR "BISCUITS":

With this information on our minds, what may have the original L have been? As a consequence, if we are to take the new direction of original viral totipotency, prokaryote and eukaryote development may have had no need for original endosymbiosis. Future, successive endosymbioses (possibly with graded intracellular retention times) may then have acted (and still may do) under a "natural law" of sorts that increases internal variation, as such suppressing unfavorable or recessive traits. (Applaud for Darwin, here!) The intracellular symbioses may also act, in some yet unknown way, to support the protection the originally "planned" progression. As to the reproductive strategy, we see it commonly, but may have been interpreting it from an incorrect bias.

In the framework being expounded, the L was seeded in that mythic "time-before-time" as a "genesis egg" that provided the original unicellular differentiation program, similar to the spore development checkpoints in Bacill! us subtilis; wherein the L’s capsid evaginated (See, also, meru.org on the Flower of Life) and provided the necessary phospholipid and proteinaceous materials to invaginate and compartmentalize the contents of the L as a communicating membrane-bound cell (i.e. a dual-ring heterochiral cDNA retrovirus absorption ’metamorphosis’, based with a reverse-transcriptase like functional unit).

As the evagination progressed, it is postulated that the two rings of cDNA became separated through progressive intracellular invagination, each then becoming encased within their own environment (organelle), the original D-type-cDNA becoming the division driver of a new item, a mitochondrion, and the L(laevorotary)-type-cDNA undergoing homochiral transition as the driver of another organelle: the eukaryotic nucleus.

(See: Speculative Intermediate Biochemistry, <A HREF="<http://64.4.20.250/cgi-bin/linkrd?_lang=EN&lah=57ae6d542004aa29b390a8037e72cf9d&lat=983820074&hm___action=http%3a%2f%2fsciencedaily%2ecom%2freleases%2f1998%2f06%2f980610082901%2ehtm>.)"

TARGET="_new"><http://64.4.20.250/cgi-bin/linkrd?_lang=EN&lah=d789047a7d4d89f1c7adeda37bedc714&lat=983820074&hm___action=

http%3a%2f%2fsciencedaily%2ecom%2frelea>! ses/1998/06/980610082901.htm.)</A>

The almost frightening observation, implicit within this scenario (but commonly found in pattern by the present day virion), is the creation of prokaryotes from eukaryotes. Let your theoretical minds go wild under punctuated equilibrium scenarios and frantic with new notions of phyletic grandualism! This idea is heresy, so be it, and so the Sun no long spins about the earth, and the spirits fall inward through the time of gnosis. You have asked of me, so let it be.

(For supportive concepts, look to the newer constructs of dissipative/replicative structures,

<A HREF="<http://64.4.20.250/cgi-bin/linkrd?_lang=EN&lah=0b7b08052f81038e7f514582dc9adb97&lat=

983820074&hm___action=http%3a%2f%2fusers%2eviawest%2enet%2f%7ekeirsey%2fpofdisstruct%2ehtml>,

" TARGET="_new"><http://64.4.20.250/cgi-bin/linkrd?_lang=EN&lah=

0b7b08052f81038e7f514582dc9adb97&lat=983820074&hm___action=

http%3a%2f%2fusers%2eviawest%2enet%2f%7ekeirsey%2fpofdisstruct%2ehtml>,

</A>

and to this understandings’ ability to confront ancient cell size issues,

<A HREF="<http://64.4.20.250/cgi-bin/linkrd?_lang=EN&lah=e0715d46db5eca230b04e97cc7ef6f4f&lat=983820074&hm___action=http%3a%2f%2fwww%2ephage%2eorg%2fbiol2010%2ehtm>,

" TARGET="_new"><http://64.4.20.250/cgi-bin/linkrd?_lang=EN&lah=e0715d46db5eca230b04e97cc7ef6f4f&lat=983820074&hm___action=

http%3a%2f%2fwww%2ephage%2eorg%2fbiol2010%2ehtm>,</A>

httpp://www.nas.ed! u/ssb/nanopanel4szostak.htm,

<A HREF="<http://64.4.20.250/cgi-bin/linkrd?_lang=EN&lah=c23cfcd64893722fcd317603fef8d020&lat=983820074&hm___action=http%3a%2f%2fwww%2enas%2eedu%2fssb%2fnanopanel4benner%2ehtm>,"

TARGET="_new"><http://64.4.20.250/cgi-bin/linkrd?_lang=EN&lah=c23cfcd64893722fcd317603fef8d020&lat=983820074&hm___action=

http%3a%2f%2fwww%2enas%2eedu%2fssb%2fnanopanel4benner%2ehtm>,</A>

<A HREF="<http://64.4.20.250/cgi-bin/linkrd?_lang=EN&lah=bd620a538586eef27d46267ec314258c&lat=983820074&hm___action=http%3a%2f%2fwww%2enas%2eedu%2fssb%2fnanopanel2vanetten%2ehtm>.)"

TARGET="_new"><http://64.4.20.250/cgi-bin/linkrd?_lang=EN&lah=bd620a538586eef27d46267ec314258c&lat=983820074&hm___action=

http%3a%2f%2fwww%2enas%2eedu%2fssb%2fnanopanel2vanetten%2ehtm>.)</A>

Special Creation? Intelligent design?

Concluding Notes:

This protocol was not intended as a step-by-step analysis within an experimental design. That is not what was requested of the author. Rather, the "offer" was made to present a global idea stream so that all the "biscuits" were in plain view. The overall approach to the notions elucidated within this discourse offers the possibility of a new paradigm (albeit one that will NEVER see the halls of polite discussion). It may give us clues as to why we see a Universe replete with structure conservation and sacred pattern repetitions. Recent work has been conducted by the "Procloners (as I like to call them)" on the back-engineering of stem cells from fully differentiated ones --- their dedifferentiation into embryonic totipotency. What totipotency is this, however? Not only mammalian, but human, not generic eukarya. This constraint is demonstrative of a contention that the L is not present in fullness under the experimental design, yet sequencing argues slight subunit di! fferentiation between we and the chimps. (See Recent Developments: PPL Therapeutics.) From thence, no other so-called "species" can be made. In other words, we are still stuck in a macroevolution paradigm that is not proved, in either direction. If we have proved that:

A. We cannot assemble a logic string that requires 1 to 2 to 3 (ranging in temporally increased complexity);
and B. We cannot take the same reality of 1, 2, and 3, then dismantle them as 3 to 2 to 1 (ranging in decreased temporal complexity);
but C. We CAN associate them as 3 to 2 to 1, as a "progressive" system (this protocol);
then D. Why are we kneeling at the altar of a NeoDarwinian religion?

Does this ring old bells and light up old bulbs, guys? Sadly, it did with me. Add to all of this the genetic potential being holographic resonance between sequences of base pairs, and we have a case for a migraine, a case within which we are all incompetent. So, then, I ask those of you "in the know": why can’t we solve our future "problem" by stepping back (in respect for the Designer) and label our regard for the "problem" in terms of a "warning" rather than an issue to be "wrestled into reality"? Illusion. Have we not fallen from this before? Is this future, this "chimeric possibility", not the true reason for imprisonment of truth-finders? Yes, I know the reasons. They are written, they are foretold. It is sad that the "tear from the eye" on the red sands teaches you nothing as you watch those underfoot become awashed in the flood of history. I expect nothing as I cannot expect one to conduct a search of the soul after consummation of a "bargain". I will never give up, for my soul travels and is given to Christ. I hear the screams of those yet unborn, in concert with the angels making indictment of humanity for the crimes being conducted upon the innocent and "innocence" in these, the "special" days.

I must give a warning, concerning those that may seek to rejoin the Lotus, once fully understood: "And so He drove the man out and posted at the east of the garden of Eden the cherubs and the flaming blade of a sword that was turning itself continually to guard the way to the tree of life. Gen. 3:24"

It’s time for me to go digging and to once more peer with the reticles of artisans. I feel in this research both the dwelling peace of Christ and the arrogance of that one who would aspire to place himself above the stars of heaven. I do this research because my soul is driven to encounter truth, no matter what "cell" into which I become "evolved".

Should the Lotus be confirmed, the power will exist to humbly ask for forgiveness of our transgressions onto the boundary of Eden, and to wipe away the stain we have so arrogantly placed upon our future. That is my reason, my hope. Decide wisely. The one of avarice still seeks the Throne, the unattainable, and would revel in our continued destruction. I am caught between the need to help and a reason not to assist. I would be simply honored beyond my worth to have a glimpse at its beauty, never to touch. The Tree of Life is reserved for the hand of God."

Cpt. Danny B Catselas Burisch, Ph.D. (U.S.M.C., Ret.)
END PROTOCOL, ENTIRE

{Editors Note: after all portions of the protocol were received and approved by the “powers that be“, things began to go bad. It appeared that the information leak had been detected.}

Go Back

Section 2 of Development of the Lotus Protocol

>From: mj01@missilemail.com
>To: snowbunny@iopener.net
>Subject: LOTUS PROTOCOL
>Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 12:45:41 +0800
>
>Debbie:
>
>All six parts have been received. Information has been declared "Outstanding!" by the reviewers. We are going to proceed with direct examination for the Lotus, as suggested in Danny’s protocol. Does Danny require direct contact with one of our staff virologists? If so, we can set meeting times and places to your (Debbie’s) choosing, with you welcomed to attend. Your service (Debbie) should be lauded. If you (Debbie) choose otherwise, Danny can have made available internet contact with him. This is your decision, Debbie. Danny MUST abide by that decision! We only wish to make the needed intellectual help available to him during this landmark enterprise. One way or the other, we would request quarterly updates (April 01, July 01, October 01, January 02) and updates at times when something of interest is found. Danny, congratulations on a job well done! PROTOCOL APPROVED!

>-----Original Message-----
>From: <snowbunny@iopener.net
>Sent: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 01:02:59 -0800
>Subject: Re: LOTUS PROTOCOL
>
>Thanks gentlemen. Danny feels pretty good right now...Don’t tell him I told you that :)

>You will receive your quarterly updates. I have documented the dates that you will need to receive them. I will send all future e-mails to this address (pretty cool address, by the way!)
>
>As for any future informational needs that Danny or myself may need assistance with, I feel at this point, they can still be done over the internet. If this would change in the future, I will request the other option that you presented me. Thank you for offering this.
>
>By the way, did you receive my forwarded e-mail about my server switching to Earthlink after March 12th? I don’t know what it will do to my mail during the transition. Hopefully, it will be smooth, and with as little problems as possible.
>
>Once again, thank you.....and good night.
>
>Debbie :)
>

{Editors Note: my contact started to become really uncomfortable, when a message from Majestic Twelve appeared in his inbox. I believe he tried to send me the whole thing, but only the headers came through — the message was missing. He didn’t dare try to resend it. However seeing Majestic Twelve cited as the source and the subject Fw:Re: LOTUSPROTOCOL made me very nervous. We both became very worried that our communication activity was being picked up and decided to change email addresses again (this time I chose the name cross winds, and shortly after that I changed again to ’paradox’) to try to maintain safety.}

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Majestic Twelve
>Sent: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 21:24:08 +0800
>To: patriot@usveteran.com
>Subject: Fw: Re: LOTUS PROTOCOL

From: <patriot@usveteran.com >
To: "Cross Winds" <paradox765@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: Fw: Fw: Protocol Section 6 of 6
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 13:08:03 +0800

That’s a fine mess he going to get us into. He should never have told them anything about this if its so bad. I don’t understand half the shit in the last part of his writing, but I do understand the reference from the Bible. If they do this it’s his fault. I read the paper while he was looking at me. I got done and my jaw fell open. He looked at me and laughed. He laughed at me! Then he took a pocket watch and swung it back and forth and said "tick 10, tick 9, tick 8, tick 7, tick 6!" Then he yelled "anyone got an hourglass?" He’s scaring the shit right out of me! He’s got to be crazy to give it to them. What makes this guy run? He’s willing to destroy everything just because he’s miffed about being jailed? I’m tempted to get him into trouble myself just to stop the thing from happening. It might be worth my life. What can be done to stop this? Can you help? Please say you can because I’m getting pretty near panic. God!

“V”

{Editors Note: I replied with this:}

You’re right, he should never have told them about this, because they will try to create it, and then manage the changes that occur, all in their arrogance and misguided efforts to be so powerful. I am afraid that they mean me, when they say that they will ’manage’ a long standing ’problem’. That is all they have ever considered me to be. I think I understand a little bit about what makes him tick ….. He has been through so much betrayal. He was tortured, they tried to alter his memories (of me, of his friends and his family) and move him to another location two and a half years ago, but it didn’t work. He has suffered seizures as a result, and when the memories finally came flooding back he became angry. Furious, in fact. He has been imprisoned, caught when he tried to escape, beaten, had his hand deliberately broken, drugged.... I don’t want to go on. For some reason, they haven’t harmed me directly, at least not yet. They threatened to kill my dog, Nikki (yes, that is the reference), watched my every move, but no violence. At least not yet. But I am afraid.

I think our friend started this research a long time ago. I remember the brackish water studies he was doing when we first met. We used to go out together to get water samples from desert pools. Then when they separated us, he was starting work on Mission Genesis, although I did not know too much about it. He used to joke that he thought Deb had more connections than he did, and now it seems as though he was right. She seems to be in charge.

From what I have surmised, he believed that they were working on the side of the Angels when this all began, trying to help another people who were suffering from damage as a result of some kind of genetic problem. He worked very hard to isolate and rectify the damage, but it began a search for the original cause of the problem. Truly the paradox I derived my email name from. Looking in the past to fix the future, or at least avert the future problem. But it now seems that it has taken on a different character, grown horns and fangs, if you will. The powers who demanded the research along these lines seems determined to experiment us all into oblivion, or at least change our present and present-future in order to force changes we have no way of understanding. If they do manage to get this on, there is no guarantee that these changes will be the ones they originally hoped for.

This brings me to my next question. What are we supposed to do? If we do nothing, the research goes forward, under what may or may not be adequate controls to prevent a wildfire spread of a variant. It could go forward under adequate controls, only to be released in a deliberate decision to change the genome, or back engineer us to be less prone to the perceived future problem they originally were trying to avert. But if we publish such an item, do we not run a similar, and more dangerous risk - could some upstart biologists decide to try to reproduce the protocol and experimentation - only under far less control. The only place we stand a chance to avoid accidental global exposure is at the facilities that are deeply buried under the sand at a base the government staunchly declares does not exist. I don’t know what to do.

As far as getting him in trouble, given his deep depressions, in a way he may be hoping that you do get him in ’trouble’ - it might be a form of ’suicide by cop’. Regardless of how well he may seem to be handling his imprisonment, I know he rails against it with every thought, every fiber of his being and soul.

What are your thoughts? I am not making any move yet, until we have given this some very very careful thought. Your position is tenuous. If they suspect anything, they won’t have to plant a hundred people. Their methods are more economical. Just hit everybody with sodium pentathol, and isolate. You should seriously consider the potential repercussions, especially since the emails about a leak etc....

I am afraid, you should be too. Our friend is past the point of caring. He has placed himself in the hands of the Creator, and has very few hopes left for his life in this world. You, on the other hand have a lot to live for, and so do I.

Perhaps instead of publishing this stuff as you have asked me to do, we should consider imbedding it into a novel, or work of fiction instead. It won’t be as effective, and probably won’t warn enough people that way, but given the state of public awareness and lethargy, the lack of interest in anything other than a half-hour of X-files-style entertainment, I wonder if the warnings will be too late anyway or simply fall upon deaf, or disinterested ears. Yet, we must do something. Our humanity is at stake. Maybe not our direct futures, but the future of our genome.

Please think carefully and give me your ideas on the matter. It’s too important, on a number of levels, to rush into without careful thought.

Your friend
YouKnowWho

From: patriot@usveteran.com
To: paradox765@hotmail.com
Subject: him
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 13:45:33 +0800

Could this be his FIRE FIRE FIRE? www.israelnationalnews.com/news.php3?id=702
Also, I got a look at a report from the NSA called "Doctrine of the Convergent Timeline Paradox". Could this be the "D of the C.T.P." he was talking about? It was just sitting on his desk before he got up and I know that I am not supposed to look at things but I did. I just saw the front cover. I didn’t touch it. It said "CLASSIFIED: COSMIC EYES ONLY!". Do you have any idea what it could mean? I didn’t know that COSMIC was real. He talked in his report about a chimeric reality. CONVERGENT - CHIMERIC ? I guess you picked a good new name PARADOX ?
"V"

{Editors Note: The document that "V" saw on Dan’s desk helped tie all the loose ends together. It connected the dots between the document Q94109A outlining Dan’s participation in the back engineering of non-terrestrial tissue, for the purposes (as explained to him during that time) of correcting a problem with "their" DNA. But it now seems that there is a future component of this equation that involves us as a species. Then this “Majestic Twelve” email came through, indicating that there was an important address change taking place:}

From: Majestic Twelve
Sent: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 21:23:03 +0800
To: patriot@usveteran.com
Subject: Fw: Re: ADDRESS CHANGE: IMPORTANT!

Ms. Burisch:

A series of security leaks has occurred at this address. After this contact, all further communications will take place directly between your address and Majestic. We know the origin of the security breach. The person has been a problem for some time and it has been determined that the person will be "managed." A Fire-Wall has been set up at your address so that you may continue to communicate as usual. Thank you and we are sorry for the inconvenience.
The M

{Editor’s Note: Deb’s reply was immediate.}

Sent: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 00:52:02 -0800
Subject: Re: ADDRESS CHANGE: IMPORTANT!

Understood
.....Debbie :)

{Editors Note: my contact was becoming terrified. He wrote to me again, asking if I could see anything in the headers…}

From: <patriot@usveteran.com>
To: paradox765@hotmail.com
Subject: Fw: Fw: Re: ADDRESS CHANGE: IMPORTANT!
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 21:42:24 +0800

What’s this? Can you read the new destination address, I can’t. Can’t figure it?
"V"

From: <patriot@usveteran.com>
To: paradox765@hotmail.com
Subject: Fw: Fw: Re: LOTUS PROTOCOL
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 13:44:12 +0800

Something IS up! This is all I have been able to piece together from the last series of letters. The email is going crazy. One thing I do know for sure is that they have traced a telephone dialing port to (3103783234). That number came up over and over again on a call report setting at the next desk. Tracing me will be almost impossible because too many use this number. Danny is allowed to answer it and if the voice is unknown or not expected, the telecommunications operator disconnects it (7027320696).

I know of someone that may be able to help you with a book, it’s just an idea but Kathleen Keating is an author about the last days and researches these kind of things. Anywho, I hope this helps. I [secretly told] him that I was talking with you. He said back "liar!". I’m sorry.

Their attitude has changed. It’s like every black suited asshole in the world has been in and out. They look through everybody like they could knock everyone off. I think they approved his idea. I heard that they are going to take him under quiet security to Lava Bute and Frenchman, whatever Lava Bute is, on April 11 in the morning. They said it may give him a chance to relax while taking samples, like he has a regular life. They told the security that they had to do whatever he wants to relax because he HAS to finish this work.

I’ll write more when I can figure out what’s going wrong with the email transfers.

{Editors Note: The next email sent showed deliberate scrambling, as my source indicated the email was ‘going crazy’.}

.comTony@iopener.nect: LOTUS O01 21:21:07 +0800Thanks gent r lowingll quarterlumented theat his address (tional nDanny oay need as I feel at o still be donerwould chaneroption that ou for o. ea r switchihdon’t know whto my mail dupefully, it wind with as lilnk youFrom: mDebbAl paeen receive. Infoto a eee"Otandingthe reviewersWegoiproceith direos suggested in Da Does Daur virlsts? If so, we can setosing, with you welcomed tservice (Debbie) should be lauded.yionMUST ab We only wish to make the needed intellectunterprise. One way uest quarterly updates (April 01, July 01, updates at times found. Danny, cojob well done! PRL ROVEDet your free e

"V"

{Editors Comment: I replied to the last email with this. The gibberish he included at the end of his email had me very concerned. }

Thank you for trying. I guess his reply was only to be expected, after all the lies he has been told. Look, I know this guy, and no matter what he [secretly relayed] to you, I think this thing is going to rattle around in his head until he can’t stand it anymore, and has to relay something back, trying to figure out if you’re really telling the truth or not. So don’t be surprised if it happens. Maybe not today, or tomorrow.... Hell, maybe not ever, if the ’powers’ have crushed his spirit too badly. But no matter what, I appreciate so very much, that you tried at all, especially after he made you so mad by laughing at your expression and then playing those games with your head. I know he can really irritate people. I think he’s refined it to near an art form over the years.

Thank you for the suggestion about that person, and her website. I will check it out. As far as the scrambled internet, it sure seems as though there is some form of encryption or scrambling going on. It might be wise to lay low and let things cool down a little bit. The tele-info is very interesting, but my voice is well known and would be unexpected.

(Was it just for info sake, or were you suggesting that I try to dial through? I’m not sure where that would be wise. I am really getting nervous about how they intend to "manage" me and I don’t want to put myself into an early grave by moving out of the classification of a ’problem’ or a ’nuisance’ into that of a ’threat’ if you know what I mean.)

But I do agree that it is pretty clear they have approved his protocol. They want more from him, and I’m sure they want his help in making the experimental phase a reality.

All I can suggest at this point is to let things settle a bit, and not stir the pot too much and force them to make drastic changes the communication method. And along that line of thought, I think I should choose another new email address shortly, just to muddy the waters as much as I can. It seems clear that they have noticed me; I have seen suspicious people hanging around me again, like they used to, when things were very tense. I may be paranoid or over cautious, but I’d rather that than face the alternative.

Please stay safe and keep well, and thank you again for trying. I really mean it.
Your friend.
YouKnowWho

{Editors Note: This last email came, not from my contact “V”, but from those who forcibly retired him. It seems that our communications activity was indeed traced back, and he suffered the consequences.}

From: patriot@usveteran.com
To: paradox765@hotmail.com
Date: 7 Mar 2001 19:54:34 -0000

THIS E-MAIL ADDRESS HAS BEEN SHUT DOWN, AS ITS OPERATOR HAS REQUESTED RETIREMENT. A REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE WILL RESULT IN THE SAME ONE BEING SENT.

SAY, WRITE WHAT ONE WANTS. THE MAJORITY DON’T LISTEN OR CARE OR BELIEVE. THEY NEED TO BE "CARED" FOR, LIKE THE CHILDREN THAT THEY ARE. ISN’T IT JUST TOO BAD THAT IT’S SO HARD TO "READ" THE IMPORTANT "CARDS" IN LIFE. THE ONLY THING THAT IS GUARANTEED TO STAY THE SAME IN LIFE IS CHANGE. WE ALL MUST ACCEPT THAT.

IGNORANCE IS BLISS! TAKE A SWIM AND FORGET ABOUT THE LITTLE TROUBLES ON YOUR MIND! YOU KNOW YOU DESERVE IT!

WITH THE BEST INTEREST IN MIND,

THE FRIENDS WHO "CARE" FOR YOU

{Editors Note: It took me three days to figure out what to do. I knew I had to try to reason with them, even if it did fall upon deaf ears. So I wrote an open letter to the "Powers that be". I figured that it would probably just generate an autoresponse, but I doubted that it would be roundfiled. I figured that even if they didn’t like it, somebody would read it.}

3/10/01
To: patriot@usveteran.com
Re: Dan Crain

While I know that this email will generate another autoresponse, I have every reason to believe that you all still gather and read whatever is sent to you. Therefore, please read the following:

From what I gather, Dan is being asked to perform an amazing scientific feat for you people, and to do so under the worst possible conditions, in terms of his mental well being, happiness, and peace of mind. Could any of you, seriously, produce good results, if your life and any chance of happiness were repeatedly torn away. Put yourselves in his shoes for a second, and ask yourself whether you could handle it, if you were in his position. Now ask yourself how much better your work would be if you were allowed some measure of peace of mind.?

There is nothing this man wants more than the opportunity to do good science, and explore new ideas. But don’t you realize that he would do so much more, be more creative and free thinking, if he were allowed some measure of real happiness in his life? While your present methods may result in ‘results‘, allowing us to communicate even if only by email (as was permitted last year) would certainly be in the real best interests of all concerned…..

While my interests are not included in your equations, I would think that you’d give careful thought to something which could be of benefit to your own situation. I am aware that he has extensive internet search capabilities pursuant to his research, I would ask that you allow him to email me periodically. I really have no desire to discuss the matters he is working on. I think I made my position reasonably clear in the emails that you have no doubt read and analyzed at length over the past few weeks. My first and foremost consideration is for Dan.

Respectfully submitted for your consideration.

{Editors Note: I heard nothing back. Not even an autoresponse, that is, until I got another strange email in my inbox from mj01@missilemail.com}

Subj: Marci, It’s me, Dan!
Date: 4/2/01 12:04:42 AM Pacific Daylight Time
From: mj01@missilemail.com (none none)
To: bjwolf007@aol.com

Marci:
It’s me. I am still alive, or at least that is what my senses continue to relay to me. First of all, I have NO IDEA IN HELL why I have been allowed to write you. I am simply grateful for the possibility of my thoughts and wishes to have reached you. The powers that be have allowed my contacting you for at least a limited time. It seems that I have engendered a numbers of folks to become startups! A number of them (at least three of which I know) have begun publicity on my behalf (from this location as well as through various email destinations and companies, such as zfee.com, handymail.com, and msn.com) and my emotional diminution has finally caused their acquiescence. I guess they believe that my attending to a few of my psychological needs may influence more positive work output. Maybe they’re right and maybe they’re not. The "shrew" peaks in on me from time to time and I am forced to make a public show whenever told. Call me a coward if you wish, but they WILL "cancel" me if I do not agree to their constraints. I only want to live.

No rescue operation would be possible as they would "cancel my contract" before I would get time to talk, if I appeared willing to do so. Apparently, their biggest duty is following the orders from the "shrew". Apparently, she holds most of the cards...to the devil with her. The "leaks" have been buttoned within the last few days (one is deceased and the others in jail) and I am supposed to proceed with my publicly normal life...so long as I don’t wander to far away from the "exercise yard"! :) My life has been made to look rather normal, save a few more visitors than normal folks have, and I need not work in society. I understand that you have "gone forth" with your life and that is good. I wish only the best for you (and he). Why are they letting me write you? Just to [cause pain] by cutting off the contact again? I don’t know. I have told them that I cannot continue without the emotional and intellectual support that you have provided to me.

A series of meetings between those that control my fate have resulted in my being told that I can relate information to you, for discussion, so long as you NEVER make any of it public... EVER! No publicity or media, no books, no articles, no presentations, no lateral information spread... NOTHING EVER! Apparently, what I have been working on is rather important to them, eh? :) If you are willing to carry on a long distance dialogue under those constraints... they may just let us talk. I am not sure as yet what information they may delete or hold classified. I know they know you have certain materials they had wished would not have been exposed. Maybe this is their way of asking for quiet? I can only hope we could discuss things again. How do you feel about this notion? Would it work with your new relationship?

Please write back.

Dan

Subj: Clarification
Date: 4/2/01 8:40:58 PM Pacific Daylight Time
From: mj01@missilemail.com (none none) To: bjwolf007@aol.com

Marci:
In case you’re wondering about what they told me concerning the publications issue... this does not mean that you cannot publish unrelated materials. I just thought that I would add that to clarify. I have fought for the last six months just to be able to communicate with you and hope that you are still there. If not, or if such communications would place your marital relationship in some type of tension, I understand. One way or the other I miss you like hell and would relish the chance to speak with you. They have placed, thus far, no constraints on the issues we can discuss aside from what they have called National Security Issues... (or) whatever the hell they want to delete, I must guess. As to my identity, you must be thinking, how can I prove same? Well, they would be able to find out just about any personal item. But, if you read this and are willing to respond I think that you will be able to ascertain it’s me, or what’s left of me.

Dan

{Editors Comment: Dan is one of the few people who refers to me by my given name. That’s one of the reasons I was willing to believe the messages actually came from him. The references to my supposed ‘marriage’ also helped cement this belief, since I had been told by my contact before he was “retired” that Dan was given this information several months earlier in an attempt to discourage him from seeking any outside help from me with this situation. As a long standing friend of Dan‘s, as well as Dan‘s family, and having collaborated with him for many long hard hours on the Eagles Disobey project, it‘s safe to say we developed a deep and abiding friendship.}

-----Original Message-----Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 08:03:35 EDT
From: mj01@missilemail.com (none none)
To: BJWolf007@aol.com

Just you and your mom? Well, well, well. Another lie generated from the shrew to control my emotions. Say "Hi" to Mom for me. Mow Mow is dead. I was gravely injured in a laboratory error involving ***CENSORED*** at ***CENSORED*** I have a new kitten, named Peepers. He’s great! Since the accident, I have had surgery for the removal of a fibrous lipoma (benign neoplasm) in the subcutaneous tissues of my right breast. The mj01 designation, as I understand, is the internal switchboard communication address that is routed through some type of firewall protective system. The question I have is this: (with the understanding that this information will reach you) - what do you mean from missilemail, again? The materials to which I was referring were allegedly mailed to you some time ago. The writer of the document, and his cohorts, made an allegation that I was involved during the Gulf War with biological warfare against the Iraqi forces, such actions ultimately resulting in Gulf War Illness. It was my understanding that handymail.com was used to direct further publicity about this allegation through a private address known as patriot@usveteran.com, not from mj01@missilemail.com.

If this were so, the documents to which you were made privy may have something to do which the project upon which I am currently working, rather than the ancillary project that I look into from time to time.. Is this so? If so, that would explain the absence of the computer switchboard technician whose name started with a V. The people around me won’t directly say, they simply smile and tell me to go ahead and communicate with you. I am certain that they are "encouraging" communication, not just making it available. I have wondered if that was a presentation due to my psychological state (as stagnant as you would expect) or if other reasons existed. I was being jovial about the importance of the project, as I thought you might not know the inference, but I now see that you may. Please let me know what you know. Have you heard the name "Lotus" lately? If the V person handed some information away, that would CERTAINLY explain why they want to emotionally "buy" your silence.

If you have some or all of a certain document, you must make up your own mind as to whether you want to proceed with that information or speak with me. I respect either decision. If you have that document, and overview of a certain project, your impression of same maybe skewed without proper context, a context I will have to ask if I can provide, should you have the information already. Goodness, I am already beginning a tortuous manner of speech... FEELS GREAT! HOPE IT REACHES YOU! :() If you are aware of the state of the art as of that document, things have changed and incidents have occurred that place me in a prime position to make certain decisions and determination. This may be even more of the reason why they are allowing my communication. On March 12, 2001, an extremely powerful entity entered the ***CENSORED*** and delivered a message to the personnel assembled there, one meant for me.

Part 2 of 2 to be sent within a day or so.
Dan

Subj: Re: Reconstruct
Date: 4/5/01 5:44:44 AM Pacific Daylight Time
From: mj01@missilemail.com (none none) To: BJWolf007@aol.com

Well now, I understand why they have encouraged the contact: you know of the Lotus. If your received the document ’in toto’ you know of even more. Mr. Bell’s radio show went down during the entity visitation (you may check his website, under "what’s new", for that date), as well did the entire area around the affected site. The entity delivered a precious message, encoded in binary for me, personally.

I will attempt to send it to you (even the original account), if allowed by the censors, should you want to see it. Prior to this visitation, the scientists searching for the Lotus examined light flashes that were not recordable (as their systems were shorted). The flashes were reported to me as having had the appearance of the sacred geometry of "Metatron’s Cube." Take a look at available data on the web for same. After you have had a chance to digest this, and should the censors allow, I wager I can set you on your duff with a piece of information, relating all the way back to the "10th. letter of the alphabet and an inertial bar"! Yes, on your duff you shall be! I am scheduled for a field examination of the Frenchman complex on April 12, starting at The Great Unconformity. Open the can of evolutionary worms at will! I would also love to hear your comments on the current situation at Mars, and the "tiny" Israel and China issues.
Dan

{Editors Note: It was time for me to say what had been bothering me most about the Lotus Protocol. I did so in the following email communication:}

Subj: Ok, here goes.....
Date: 4/10/01 2:19:06 PM Pacific Daylight Time
From: BJWolf007
To: mj01@missilemail.com

I’d like to try to put some words to my thoughts about the paradox I sense inherent in the work. (I freely admit that I could be entirely wrong - an end up looking like a big goof, but here goes....)

Dan, in your earlier work, trying to back-engineer the neural failures associated with those ’captivating’ individuals - in essence looking for a more ’primitive’ version of the genetic coding with which to effect a repair made me think ..... how successful can you actually be with your efforts, since they are physically suffering from the problem and have brought it to our attention here and now. A successful resolution couldn’t have been accomplished since it did not effect the hoped-for repairs. Had it done so, there would have been no degradation of the neural tissue to prompt the initial request for help or drive your study. (Tenses become such a problem) And if indeed, these individuals who have ’captured’ our collective attention did manage to do more than gaze at a looking glass.... if they managed to engineer genetic changes in a Biblical scenario, or at several much earlier points (consider the unprecedented increases in intracranial capacity of proto-humans with no evidence of ramping-up to the new the new levels of encephalation) then I can see why you have had to move farther and farther back in your search for clues to the ’primitive’ structures necessary to assist in the repairs originally sought. I think that this current research path, (hopscotching back before they attempted to affect self-help) and seeking a primitive viral object, could really do the trick,

But to fix this problem, the ’powers’ might need to do more than simply offer a solution, they will probably need to pro-engineer us into a people resistant to the genetic degradation that triggered the neurological symptomology in the first place. There is probably a better word than pro-engineer, but it is all I could come up with to render the concept of ’engineering into an unknown future form’ which I see in my minds-eye. This is the part that has me most concerned. If we pro-engineer ourselves to preclude the identified problem, much like giving the human race a global immunization to the future problem, then we could be:

1) engineering our genetic material into a form that will be susceptible to a completely different problem - one we have no idea even exists because paradoxically, it hasn’t happened yet. There could be severe deleterious results.

2) removing the need or impetus for those ’captivating’ people to make the previous contacts they did with us - contacts drove our ancestors in the direction they needed to go, in order to produce us.... today.

Well, you wanted me to clarify my thoughts. Of course, these are just generalizations. I don’t want to go into any serious detail or make any direct references to your work until I find out whether your censors are going to have a stroke over this....and suspend our communications :()

Marci

Subj: Re: Did you enjoy?
Date: 4/13/01 8:48:25 PM Pacific Daylight Time
From: mj01@missilemail.com (none none) To: BJWolf007@aol.com

The ducks were fine, as well as the geese…….. The so called "brain power" that I am offered is dogmatic and boring. I am surprised that Sir William of Ockham doesn’t drag himself from the grave and retrieve each and every one of them! And if he did, they would be too lead-headed to yell for help! Your thoughts are fresh and alive! That is what I, we, science, and the world need. Secrecy agreement....God I wish it would happen! Should it, that old shrew could go (replacing the "h" with a "c") "S-H-REW" herself! Little relaxation at Sunset, just waiting.

The visit to the Frenchman complex was extremely interesting. They had me dress in an all blue flight jump-suit with a reflective multicolored patch on the upper left chest area. Each to spot, I would assume. The authorities remained a good distance from me, accept the shrew, that followed along like a puppy trying to sniff everything I was doing. The children were also deposited there... along with the shrew’s mother (her father having passed away)... the happy family! They stayed a good distance away. I think that was all for those that may be wandering by... made it all look good I would assume.

Two white 4X4’s remained about a mile away, up the "jeep road" that ascends to the peak, and observed from that vantage. I ascended a sheep’s climb area, at the Great Unconformity-Vishu communication and lost the shrew within moments... talk about comical! The sounds of "ooh!" and "achk!" were everywhere. I started laughing so hard at one point I nearly fell myself! :[]

Seemingly alone, but under the distant camera, I went to work and removed 23 samples of Vishnu Schist (ranging from 2cm.X2cm. shards to grapefruit size, and only removed from isolated groups not communicating with the tapeats sandstone/feldspar swash zone), two of the samples were placed in isolation containers. One contained a potato size piece that was perceived to give my right palm a very mild "shock" (very strange!) when I grabbed it and the second, a 4cm.X 4cm. sample of crustose lichenous fungi obtained from the magnetic North (but under an over-hang) side of a Vishnu Schist (carrier) prominence (initially classified by me as Lecanora muralis {alt. Squamaria muralis}, that was demonstrating prominent light brown ascocarps; var. not yet keyed-out).

The final sample was approximately 3cm. of sand and detritus, dusted from crevices between tightly adjoined pieces of the schist, found in a low-lighted fissure area. After three hours I returned to the vehicle with the samples, privately giggling as I watched the shrew applying masses of bandaids. :) The samples have been recorded and sealed and I am awaiting an "okay" to proceed with further examination. The only stipulation I demanded was that the samples not be removed from my presence, for chain-of-custody issues. Yes, wonderful! Please review the work and apply that brain of yours to my theoretical origins work. I am very interested to hear critiques and challenges to the cytogenesis theory I expounded therein. VERY INTERESTED! I NEED A GOOD ARGUMENT! These idiots around me are either too stupid or too afraid to challenge. Pathetic primates! Hear me! You’re P-A-T-H-E-T-I-C !!! Enough yelling at them....for now. Take your time with the review and then let’s get Darwinian-nasty!!! ;}

Dan

Subj: ASSISTANCE PLEASE!
Date: 4/16/01 11:39:32 PM Pacific Daylight Time
From: mj01@missilemail.com (none none)
To: bjwolf007@aol.com

I am currently investigating along these lines:

1. The S component of the L may exist as an information containing crystal (or crystal complex) within a dielectric medium such as the mica component of the Vishnu Schist. Refer to information regarding the tetrahedron-octahedron crystal geometry of mica and the sacred geometry conjecture that these precise platonic solids comprise matter.

2. The information (the S) may be getting "discharged" from this natural mechanism of capacitance via a G to the V. L=V+G+SI bring this notion to the minds around me and they stare.

Any information or research that you may be able to bring to this issue, including the idea of DNA and crystals, will be of great help! I know that you are quite the geologist...here’s your chance to, as one would say..."really get down and dirty." Also, from your unique perspective, do crystals contain healing properties and if so, why? Back to crystal crunching!

Dan

{Editors Note: after several email exchanges, the “powers that be” must have seen some significant improvement in Dan’s psychology and ability to do the work they demanded, so he was told that a “field trip” was being scheduled so that we could meet briefly and continue the discussions}

Subj: FIELD TRIP!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Date: 4/17/01 10:24:08 PM Pacific Daylight Time
From: mj01@missilemail.com (none none)
To: bjwolf007@aol.com

I have just been informed that I am being tentatively scheduled for a field trip to the UNLV Lied Library, on Wednesday, April 25, at approximately 10:30am. The important part of the message was "...and yeh I guess, a meeting with her is not out of the question, but you’ll be under close guard…“ :) !!!!! If this fits with your schedule, let me know. :)
Dan

{Editors Note: several more letters were sent from Dan’s email address, and all of them were heavily censored. Even the subject lines said ***CENSORED****. I advised him of this, and he wrote the following reply:}

Subj: Re: FIELD TRIP!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Date: 4/18/01 11:58:52 PM Pacific Daylight Time
From: mj01@missilemail.com (none none)To: BJWolf007@aol.com

No, the letter is gone. :(
Maybe better that it didn’t arrive. I went on a tirade about how much I am now like Quasimodo and am not anymore well suited for society and asking for you to excuse me. I shake a lot and don’t deal well with many people around me. I have been secreted for about 2 years in silent study places and have problems with ambient noise. I am just afraid of anyone seeing me as I am a mess. I have not been given further instructions, yet, and am awaiting them

Dan

Subj: Re: :)
Date: 4/20/01 8:22:27 PM Pacific Daylight Time
From: mj01@missilemail.com (none none)
To: BJWolf007@aol.com

I’m okay. Wednesday is now firm, or as firm as they let me see things be. The front of the Lied Library is okay.

I have been instructed to park across Maryland Parkway and walk up University Road, then cut into Tumbleweed Tech northbound along the road near the end of University Road. From there I will walk northwest diagonally across the lawn to reach the Library. The fact that they have given me such instructions is strange to me, because on any Field Trip, I haven’t been allowed to drive myself. I am a little nervous driving that far, as I haven’t in some time.

They stated that they would be watching and that I would most likely identify them easily but to relax. Once meeting you, the location(s) of our discussions has not been restricted. They seem to be trying to be nice to me. I am not accustomed to it, not at all. HOLD ON TO YOURSELF! I have been told to have "free" discussions with you, only limited by research, development, and deployment of weapons. That sat me down! My arrival time at the restaurant (I still don’t remember the name) across from the U. will be about 10:30a and I’ll walk in from there

Dan

{Editors Note: It was clear from this email, that Dan’s spirits were beginning to be restored. His quizzical sense of humor (this time relating to an earlier note in which Pringles potato chips were mentioned) was reasserting itself, just as it had during the time of our collaboration on Eagles Disobey. It was amazing to once again see the science and good humor resting once again side by side….}

Subj: Re: :) Date: 4/21/01 10:19:40 PM Pacific Daylight Time
From: mj01@missilemail.com (none none)To: BJWolf007@aol.com

Yes! Pringles! Those insidious little warped potato demons! They locate you. They stalk you. Then...they move in for the kill! Their weapon, you may ask? Salty Numbers! You fall prey. One after another. They laugh at you, poke fun at you from their cartons! Evil they are! EVIL I SAY! The only way to beat them is elimination, and the only way to elimination is consumption! :) To give you an idea where you helped, let me see if I can express this as a short statement so this system can handle it: "The longitudinal issues implicit within your age statement and the complicating natures involving both cyanobacterial and green algal slow-parasitic endosymbiosis, had not been considered. Such an age and given the philosophical relationship of cyanobacteria and green algae ultimately resolving as a liberated ascospore from a fungus, carries with it very deep implications for the understanding of the web of life. Let me know if it got to you.

Dan

{Editors Note: This was followed-up with a Post Script}

P.S. If possible, try to think of a location where we can speak at length and yet not have tons of folks pressing up against us, near us, etc. I really do have a problem being around many people. I’m scared. Plus, they will be watching closely, I’m sure. I will be in shorts, a Hawaiian shirt, and my field hat. I don’t know if I will have time to shave. I have a video conference at 0800 and a call coming in at 0930.
I’m feeling stress.

Dan

{Editors Note: I was astonished that my earlier thought stream had been of value. But that’s no doubt why the “powers that be” were allowing our communication. Their agenda was never in doubt, they want to get the best scientific thoughts possible from Dan. Unfortunately, that sentiment was not echoed by all the various factions at work within the program. Another group, those controlled by Deb apparently got wind of the upcoming meeting and decided to put the brakes on the plan. This note was received the evening before the scheduled Field Trip.}

Subj: GET IT IN YOUR HEAD?
Date: 4/24/01 9:52:55 PM Pacific Daylight Time
From: mj01@missilemail.com (none none)
To: BJWOLF007@AOL.COM

I probably shouldn’t take my time writing to you but you have been a pain in my ass. I just found out about Boo Boo writing to you and am fixing that problem. Those responsible have been _____!
Contact with you will NEVER be again! Boo Boo is retired and needs his rest. He’s not involved in any work anymore! Don’t write back! You know who this is!

{Editors Note: Although this was not signed, given the phrasing and peculiar syntax I have reason to think that this was written by Deb. No further contact from Dan was forthcoming, until someone else in the program decided that things had become so bad, they had to risk contacting me.}

What happened next was amazing..............

Return