| 
			  
			
			
 
  by Jessica Lear
 February 18, 2013
 
			from
			
			ScienceRecorder Website
 
			  
			Water in the moon?
 
			It seems so
 
			
 According to a new study (Water 
			in Lunar Anorthosites and Evidence for a Wet Early Moon), 
			the long accepted theory of how the moon was formed
			
			may have to be reexamined.
 
 This recent study has revealed that the interior of the moon held 
			water early in its lunar history. Some scientists speculate this new 
			information may clash with the current explanation for how the moon 
			was formed.
 
 Examining samples collected from the moon during the Apollo 
			missions, a research team at the University of Michigan has 
			determined that the interior of the moon used to contain water. The 
			samples that were studied were collected from the lunar highlands, 
			which is considered the original lunar crust. At its start, the moon 
			was made mostly of molten material until the crust solidified into 
			the moon we see now.
 
			  
			The new study suggests that there was 
			water present within the moon while it was still in its molten 
			phase.
 Until now, most scientists have agreed that the moon was formed by 
			debris leftover from a small-body planet impact with Earth. 
			According to this theory, any water found on the moon was brought 
			there after its formation by solar winds or small meteorites.
 
			  
			In essence, the new research says the 
			moon contained water before it solidified while the old theory 
			insists water was brought to the lunar surface after its formation 
			by various objects on impact. 
				
				“Because these are some of the 
				oldest rocks from the moon, the water is inferred to have been 
				in the moon when it formed,” said Youxue Zhang of the University 
				of Michigan.    
				“This is somewhat difficult to 
				explain with the current popular moon-formation model, in which 
				the moon formed by collecting the hot ejecta as the result of a 
				super-giant impact of a martian-size body with the proto-Earth.” 
			Youxue Zhang said if the old 
			model was correct, the hot ejecta would have degassed the moon 
			completely, eliminating all traces of water on the lunar surface.
			 
			  
			Following examination of the lunar 
			samples under a microscope equipped with a spectrometer, the team of 
			researchers discovered that the rocks contain 6 parts per million 
			of water.  
			  
			The amount is far less than that found 
			on Earth’s driest deserts, but it far exceeds previous estimates 
			related to the lunar debris theory. According to the Michigan 
			researchers, the amount translates to the moon’s magma ocean 
			containing upwards of 320 parts per million of water.
 The study follows in the wake of a number of studies aimed at better 
			understanding the moon’s early days.
 
			  
			The study released last year announced 
			the discovery of small amounts of water on the moon’s surface, which 
			researchers say arrived via small asteroids and comets sent smashing 
			into the lunar surface.  
			  
			Earlier this year, a pair of NASA probes 
			were directed to crash land in the side of a lunar mountain, 
			providing scientists with a wealth of data related to the moon’s 
			subsurface. The pair of probes spent much of the previous year 
			relaying information on the moon’s gravitational field back to 
			Earth.
 Although the formation of the moon was thought to be a solved 
			mystery, its validity seems to be in question. Whether or not 
			researchers decide to take the challenge to determine how the moon 
			was created once and for all is still up in the air.
 
 The findings were published online Sunday at 'Water 
			in Lunar Anorthosites and Evidence for a Wet Early Moon', 
			in the journal Nature Geoscience.
 
 
			  
			  |