by Arjun Walia
February 08,
2017
from
Collective-Evolution Website
A new study published in the Journal of Space Exploration titled "The
Mounds of Cydonia - Elegant Geology, or Tetrahedral Geometry and
Reactions of Pythagoras and Dirac?"
has added to the already robust evidence pointing to "artificial
surface interventions" on Mars.
The main premise of the
article is that these structures, if indeed artificial,
"provide an elegant
and concise way for an intelligent species to transmit to
another intelligence evidence that it understands the basics of
tetrahedral geometry, prime numbers, and the quantum mechanics
of the electrons spin, thereby giving additional evidence for
the possibility of intelligent intervention."
In 1976, the United
States sent a pair of space probes, known as
Viking 1 and Viking 2,
to Mars.
Viking 1 was launched on
August 20, 1975, and Viking 2 was launched in September of the
same year. Both probes photographed the surface of Mars from orbit,
and one studied the planet from the surface.
Since then, more pictures
have been taken, and this particular study is based on high
resolution images from the ESA
Mars Express and NASA
orbiter HiRise
cameras, and deals with the structures that have been found in the
Cydonia region of Mars.
A Mathematical
Mystery
An initial analysis, published in the Journal of Scientific
Exploration in 1999, was conducted by Dr. Horace Crater, a
physics professor at the University of Tennessee Space Institute (UTSI),
alongside Professor Stanley V. McDaniel.
During this time, only
the 1976 Viking photos were available, taken from many kilometers
above the surface of the planet, with a resolution of 47 meters per
pixel.
In 2006, the European Space Agency (ESA) re-photographed the
same area at a much better resolution, confirming the existence of
the "mounds" as well as the tight, precise mound layout.
The above noted recent paper,
published in Space Exploration,
and also authored by Horace Crater alongside Professor
Stanley V. McDaniel,
the Founder of The
Society for Planetary SETI Research.
McDaniel and Ananda
Sirisena, reinforces the strange configuration by comparing
three datasets. The resolution of the ESA 2006 photos is 13.7 meters
per pixel and that of NASA's MRO HiRise 2014 images is 5 meters per
pixel. This is compared to the original 47m per pixel Viking shots.
Presented below are
the mounds from all three spacecraft, showing clearly the parallel
lines and right-angled triangles formed by their layout.
Is there a message
implicit in this ground plan?
Below is a set of
slides sent to me by one of the authors that he commonly uses in his
presentations to elaborate on the uniqueness of the layout and it
implications.
Be
sure to check out the details in the actual
above noted
study for an in-depth analysis and more photos of why this
geology and these mathematical measurements are so intriguing.
More
Strange Anomalies on Mars In the Cydonia Area
As Viking 1
spacecraft was circling the planet, it spotted the shadowy
likeness of a human face.
An enormous head nearly two miles from
end to end seemed to be staring back at the cameras from a
region of the Red Planet
called Cydonia. A pyramid structure was
also seen. This will be the main topic of this article.
As a quick side note here, for years
we've been made to believe that Mars is a dry and arid planet,
completely devoid of life, but that's just not the case.
Mars
actually used to be an Earth-like planet, with giant oceans and
extensive greenery. The soil is moist and wet, and there is a very
high likelihood that some type of life exists within the interior of
Mars today.
You can watch that full press conference
here below:
Water Flowing on Present-Day Mars
The question to ask
here is, did NASA know this information from the Viking data in
1976?
According to multiple insiders who have worked for the agency,
NASA is not always honest, and we are only being told this now
because they believe we are ready to process and accept these facts.
For example,
Bob Dean, a retired United States Army Command Sergeant
Major who also served at the Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers
Europe (SHAPE) of NATO as an intelligence analyst, gave a lecture on
footage and photos that had been erased and kept hidden for decades:
Ladies and gentlemen, my
government, NASA, which many of us in the United States say
stands for 'Never A Straight Answer,' proceeded to erase 40 rolls of film of the Apollo
Program - the flight to the Moon, the flight around the Moon,
the landings on the Moon, the walking guys here and there.
They
erased, for Christ's sake, 40 rolls of film of those events.
Now
we're talking about several thousand individual frames that were
taken that the so-called authorities determined that you did not
have a right to see. Oh, they were 'disruptive,' 'socially
unacceptable,' 'politically unacceptable.'
I've become furious.
I'm a retired Command Sergeant Major. I was never famous for
having a lot of patience.
You can watch the
full lecture here.
He is one of
multiple people accusing NASA of doing this. The Russian government
did the same last year.
The
Giant Face and Pyramid on Mars
Above, you'll see
the original picture taken by Viking which, as you can imagine,
created quite the buzz when the world got to see it.
To the right,
you can see a close-up of the face, as well as a pyramid in close
proximity, taken by Viking. To the left, you will see the
original picture taken by NASA, straight from their website in
1976.
Above the picture to your left and right you will see three
different images which, according to NASA, are clearer versions of
the pictures taken with improved instruments.
In their
original
caption of the picture, NASA described it as a,
"huge rock
formation... which resembles a human head... formed by shadows
giving the illusion of eyes, nose and mouth."
The authors reasoned
it would be a good way to,
"engage the public and attract attention
to Mars."
Well, according to
multiple insiders with extensive backgrounds, this is not the case,
and NASA lied about the images and data they collected, as well as
fudged data and images.
Based on these testimonies, among others,
the photos released in 1998 and 2001 were meant to debunk rumors
and put the issue to rest.
The
Scientists
Dr.
John Brandenburg
The picture above,
which includes the pyramid, was taken from a
lecture (below video)
given by Dr.
John Brandenburg (at the 26:46 mark).
Any scientist who
publicly shares information that challenges commonly held belief
systems, as well as what's been put out by mainstream media, will
always come under public scrutiny and ridicule.
But when you have
worked on space plasma technologies, nuclear fusion, and advanced
space propulsion, and invented the
Microwave
Electro-Thermal plasma thruster using water propellant for space
propulsion, you deserve to be taken seriously.
This is the case
with Dr. John Brandenburg. He has also worked for the government
with top-secret security clearances on various projects.
He worked
on the,
-
Rocket Plume Regolith Interactions on the Moon and Mars
-
Vortex theory of Rocket engine design
-
the combined Sakharov-Kaluza-Klein
theory of Field Unification for purposes of space propulsion and
Mars science
Brandenburg was
also the Deputy Manager of
the Clementine Mission to the Moon, which
was part of a joint space project between the Ballistic Missile Defence Organization (BMDO) and NASA.
The mission discovered
water
at the Moon's poles in 1994. (Source:
page 16 of 18 -
source
-
source)
He currently works
as a consultant to Morningstar Applied Physics.
Here is one of his latest research
endeavors. Brandenburg also
works as a part time instructor of astronomy, physics, and
mathematics at Madison College, and other learning institutions in
Madison, Wisconsin.
Here's what he had
to say:
"Someone complained to me, John,
why do you have to bring Cydonia into this? And I said, because
I can read a map...
Here's what's at Cydonia Mensa. There's
the face on Mars, there's the D & M pyramid...
Here it is in
a second shot, this was taken July 25th, this was taken 30 days
later, the government was apparently doing a follow-up
investigation.
These two pictures (pictures above to your left) tell you everything you need
to know about what's at Cydonia Mensa
(region of Mars).
If you see
on a planet that used to be Earth-like, a carved human face and
a pyramid within 5 km of each other... it doesn't take a
rocket scientist to figure out what this all means, you can
connect the dots...
I mean sometimes, and I can tell you as
a scientist and I've seen other scientists do this, if you're
cornered, you're just brazing it out, you hold up a picture of a
buffalo and insist that it's a dog.
You can watch his
entire lecture, or read
this article we recently published on it to get his main points.
Dr
Brain O'Leary
Dr.
Brian O'Leary
was a NASA astronaut, and a member of the sixth group of astronauts
selected by NASA in 1967.
After this, he was recruited by
Carl Sagan
to teach at Cornell University in the late 1960s, where he
researched and lectured in the Department of Astronomy and Physics.
After Cornell, he taught physics, astronomy, and science policy
assessment at various academic institutions, including the
University of California Berkeley, Hampshire College, and finishing
off at Princeton University from 1976 to 1981.
After that, he went
on to Washington, where he would become an advisor to various
political leaders, presidential candidates, and the United States
Congress.
O'Leary was also a member of the American Association for
the Advancement of Science, as well as secretary of the American
Geophysical Union's Planetology Section.
Furthermore, he was the
team leader of the Asteroidal Resources Group for NASA's Ames Summer
Study on Space Settlements.
He was a founding board member of the
International Association for New Science as well as founding
president of the New Energy Movement.
O'Leary was always
skeptical about Mars, and there are several others within these
circles who were as well. I will be focusing on three.
He had some
interesting things to say during a live interview with Kerry Cassidy
of
Project Camelot (view full live interview
here, read transcript of video
here).
O'Leary and
Carl Sagan were close for a number of years,
but had a falling out when O'Leary decided to leave Cornell.
In the interview,
he remarked:
"It
was… One very cold snowy day in May, I landed in Syracuse, and there
was a horizontal blizzard - in May - and I said: That's
it for upstate New York.
And Carl thought that was very
frivolous. Because, of course, he was kind of an empire-builder kind
of guy; and he also had a huge ego."
After he left,
O'Leary started to examine some of Carl's work.
He said that the
famous "Face" in Cydonia on Mars - photographed by Viking in 1975,
this enormous formation (about a mile across) resembled a human face
and created a major buzz at the time - was tampered with by Sagan
before being released to the public:
"It
was very, very disappointing to me, because not only was Carl wrong,
he also fudged data.
He published a picture of the 'Face' in Parade
Magazine, a popular article, saying that the 'Face' was just a
natural formation, but he doctored the picture to make it not look
like a face."
At this time, Sagan
and O'Leary were arguably the world's two leading experts on Mars,
and they entered into many disagreements over that face.
This rift
was made clear in O'Leary's publication in 1998, "Carl Sagan & I: On
Opposite Sides of Mars."
It can be found in The
Case for the Face - Scientists Examine the Evidence for Alien
Artifacts on Mars.
In May of 1990,
O'Leary released a paper titled
"Analysis
of Images of the Face on Mars and Possible Intelligent Origin" which
only further demonstrated his skepticism. It was published in the
Journal of the British Interplanetary Society, Vol.43 No.5.
O'Leary also went
on the record and stated:
I began to realize, just directly
from the scientific point of view, not only hearsay, that this
man was colluding with NASA, that there might be more to this
than before...
Carl was on a committee with a number of
notable people. There was a report issued by the
Brookings Institution in 1961
- and that's about when I knew
Carl, during those years.
The
'60s mostly was when I worked
closely with him - that he and this other group said: Well,
if any ETs ever showed up on the Earth, it has to be covered up.
That's the only way we're going to be able to manage this,
because if we can't, then it would be too much of a culture
shock.
Source
Quite a shocking
statement from someone of Brian's stature, isn't it?
In the
interview, he goes on to say that Carl and his colleagues
recommended that the governments cover up the UFO phenomenon, and
that he believes this provided justification for the ongoing
cover-up.
When it comes to
Mars, as mentioned earlier in the article, Sagan was a big debunker
of the face, publishing multiple works stating that it was not a
face, there were no pyramids, and that these are all the stuff of
conspiracy theories.
What's interesting
here is that not only does O'Leary mention Sagan and his
relationship with him, but so does Dr. John Brandenburg.
In the
lecture he gave, cited earlier in the article, Brandenburg also
mentions that he was in contact with Sagan, that he sent Sagan the
images of Mars with an analysis of the Face and Pyramids, and
that it was clear that that's what they were.
The response from
Sagan to Brandenburg?
"I never received them."
Dr.
Norman Bergrun
A mechanical
engineer, Dr. Norman Bergrun has worked for Ames Research Laboratory, NACA
(National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics), and Lockheed Missiles
and Space Company, now known as Lockheed Martin.
He then went on to
found Bergrun Engineering and Research.
Obviously, he is another
qualified individual with an impressive background. You can view
some of his publications for NASA, where he worked for more than a
decade, here.
In
this
interview, Bergrun accuses that agency of "garbling" photos and
fudging data, as well as the face that was found in Mars in 1976.
PROJECT CAMELOT
Norman Bergrun -
Ringmakers of Saturn
INTERVIEW
What
Does This Tell Us and Why Is It Important?
We live in an age
where more and more people are waking up to the secrecy that plagues
our planet.
Ten years ago, if you were to mention that we are being
'watched' through various high tech means, it would have been
unbelievable, but thanks to people like
Edward Snowden, we know this
to be true.
It's unfortunate to
realize that so many facts about our world are kept hidden from us,
supposedly for the sake of 'national security,' but it's quite
evident that there are also special interests at stake, and secrecy
is used to preserve and uphold these interests, whatever they may
be.
Today we have many
whistleblowers with verified credentials from various agencies and
branches of government who are spilling the beans on several
different topics, as well as other evidence to corroborate and back
up what the say.
While witness
testimony is not always deemed credible, when you have up to,
arguably, more than one thousand qualified people coming forward, it
becomes difficult to ignore.
Today, in 2017,
it's important to keep an open mind, because information will keep
emerging that threatens the belief systems of many. Too often we
completely shut down any chance of even entertaining this type of
information, and that's done out of fear.
When we've been shielded
from the truth for so long it can indeed be scary, and sometimes
downright unbelievable, to wake up to the truth.
Secrecy is a great
way for the establishment to keep us in line and prevent the human
race from growing, expanding, and exploring, but our consciousness
is shifting.
We are
becoming more aware, more curious, and more
passionate about creating a better human experience for the entire
race.
We are constantly distracted with our own lives, trying to put
food on the table and make it through another work week, having our
minds, thoughts, and wants programmed into our brains through mass
marketing, but many people are no longer resonating with this type
of human experience.
It's time to start
asking the bigger questions. It's time for the human race to leave
its infancy and grow into adulthood, and transparency is the first
step.
Proper progress cannot be made if a civilization tries to move
forward blindly, unconscious of the true nature of reality.
|