- A SECOND Avionics specialist has detected a SECOND
REMOTE CONTROL ANTENNA on the airliner that was crashed into the South
Tower. She agreed with the other avionics expert that the blade
antennas circled in yellow are not found on a commercial airliner. In
the photo, note the yellow circled area on the Tail section. Called a
PLANAR PHASED ARRAY ANTENNA it replaces a dish satellite antenna that
would be impossible to lock on to in a fast moving aircraft.
-
- Excerpts from her emails:
-
- * The blades antennas (circled in yellow) in the
photos look too large to me to be a standard VHF type aircraft blade.
The size would indicate a lower frequency... they could be high gain
microwave antennas.
-
- * Microwave is highly-directional but the very short
wavelength would make very fine control possible.
-
- * I concur with your
assessment re: anomalous
antennas shown in 9-11 photograph. I was involved in downlink
telemetry and guidance for years/
-
- * I had not seen the photo before that you analyzed,
but they certainly look like VHF (or perhaps even lower frequency HF)
blades (antennas). The planar antenna on the vertical stab (Tail
section) is also very interesting. It looks like they just glued it to
the stab (Tail section), no concealment at all....what arrogance! They
didn't seem to take a lot of time to conceal the avionics, someone
must have felt that there was not a significant risk of the A/C
(aircraft) being photographed, and the speed would blur the image if
it was photographed.
-
- * A planar antenna is a flat plane antenna (like a
pizza) and the one that I'm talking about appears to be on the
vertical stabilizer (vertical fin). It could be a logo, but it doesn't
look like a UA logo. I WISH =that we had the technology to define the
picture further, perhaps using adaptive neural artificial
technology..... way out on the bleeding edge
-
- HER WISH IS MY COMMAND
-
-
-
-
-
- A Spanish University has scientifically analyzed the
ST airliner photos. THE UNIVERSITY ANALYST MISSED THE TAIL PLANAR
ANTENNA BUT THE PHOTOS DIDN'T. Concentrate ONLY on the vertical tail
section in the following photos.
-
- FROM
http://www.amics21.com/911/report.html
- AMPARO SACRISTÁN CARRASCO
- PROFESSOR AT THE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL
- Mataró (Barcelona, Spain)
- March 26 2003
-
- The images obtained in the news report on the attack
show certain changes in luminance on the underside of the fuselage.
Because all commercial airliners have a cylindrical fuselage, in
principle, these variations in luminance make no sense.
-
- In order to try to explain what can be seen with the
naked eye, the images were digitally processed, without altering the
information, to account for the changes in luminance.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Professor Carrasco notes (Since) "all commercial
airliners have a cylindrical fuselage, in principle, (there shouldn't
be) ...variations in luminance The following photos show the normal
pattern of luminance on a Boeing 767.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- FROM:
http://www.govcomm.harris.com/solutions/marketindex/
product.asp?source=alpha&product_id=364
-
-
-
-
-
- Further explanation of the planar antenna
technology:
-
http://www-nt.uni-paderborn.de/forschung/planarantennen_engl.htm
-
-
-
- KARL SCHWARZ has the big Pentagon picture in
hard-hitting analysis at:
-
-
http://www.onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/
-
- Note the html ending.
- Visit
www.karlschwarz.com for the big 9/11 picture
and more.
-
- In the hardest hitting journalism since 9/11, THE
POWER HOUR RADIO SHOW has totally revamped and added new analysis to
an earlier video. 911 IN PLANE SITE, The Director's Cut. Visit
www.policestate21.com to order. A quote from their South Tower
airliner video analysis: "...there was some sort of incendiary or
explosive that would serve as a match to ignite the enormous amount of
fuel (when the plane hit the ST.)"
-
-
This
page
has the full story.
-
|
