by Marco Torres
March 13, 2012
from
PreventDisease Website
Marco Torres is a
research specialist, writer and consumer advocate for
healthy lifestyles. He holds degrees in Public Health
and Environmental Science and is a professional speaker
on topics such as disease prevention, environmental
toxins and health policy. |
In the event that the public becomes too informed and savvy about
toxic additives in our food supply, what's a multi-billion dollar
industry to do?
The first step is to create another more
toxic version of the additive. The second step is to collude with
regulatory authorities such as the FDA to convince the public that
the new, more toxic additive is safe. The third and final step is to
prevent the toxic additive from being listed on any ingredient
labels.
From the folks that brought us
Aspartame, meet Neotame, a deadly sweetener that you'll never see on
a label because... well that's just the way the FDA wants it.
Neotame is officially marketed as an
inexpensive artificial sweetener made by NutraSweet, which is a
former division of Monsanto and original manufacturer of aspartame.
Eighty percent of all Food and Drug Administration (FDA) complaints
pertain to aspartame's adverse reactions. These reports include:
grand mal seizures, brain tumors, blindness and other health-related
problems, including deaths.
Monsanto’s Nick Rosa stated in
1998, that Neotame is,
“based on the aspartame formula.”
It is up to 13,000 times sweeter than
sucrose (table sugar).
The product is very attractive to food
manufacturers, as its use greatly lowers the cost of production
compared to using sugar or high fructose corn syrup (due to the
lower quantities needed to achieve the same sweetening).
Neotame is aspartame plus 3-di-methylbutyl, which can be found on
the EPA’s list of most hazardous chemicals.
The aspartame formula is
comprised of,
-
Phenylalanine [50%], which caused seizures in lab
animals
-
Aspartic Acid [40%], which caused “holes in the brains”
of lab animals,
...bonded by Methyl Alcohol, or Methanol [10%] which
is capable of causing blindness, liver damage and death.
Methanol, or wood alcohol in aspartame breaks down further in heat
and in the body, into Formaldehyde (embalming fluid), Formic Acid
(venom in ant stings) and the most deadly of all - Diketopiperazine
(DKP), a brain tumor agent.
When it comes to human health, neotame is in the same dangerous
category as aspartame, but it is a deadlier neurotoxin, immunotoxin
and excitotoxin. The long-term effects are essentially cell-death.
Even Monsanto's own pre-approval studies of neotame revealed adverse
reactions. Unfortunately, Monsanto only conducted a few one-day
studies in humans rather than encouraging independent researchers to
obtain NIH funding to conduct long-term human studies on the effects
of neotame.
There were NO independent studies that found neotame to be safe. All
industry-funded studies are now being found to be based on very
poorly designed, deceptive and fraudulent research .
This is no surprise given all of the problems with aspartame
industry research and scientific abuse. It is clear that any neotame
research that Monsanto, industry groups, or consultants of Monsanto
should be rejected until which time more trustworthy, independent
research can be conducted.
Such experiments should include
independent animals studies and especially long-term (e.g., 4-5
years+) human studies in various susceptible population groups.
Approval and
Labeling
Neotame was approved by the FDA for general use in July 2002, and
has now been approved by the EU.
It is also is approved for use in
Australia, New Zealand and Canada.
The FDA loosened all labeling requirements for Neotame as part of a
large-scale effort to make it a near-ubiquitous artificial
sweetener, to be found on the tabletop, in all prepared foods, even
in organics. It simply does not have to be included in the
ingredient list. How's that for stealth?
If you purchase processed foods, whether USDA Certified Organic or
not, that food may likely contain Neotame because it is
cost-effective, and since no one knows it is there, there is no
public backlash.
The USDA states that their National Organic Program (NOP) does not
permit the use of neotame in products labeled certified organic,
however this is likely a deceptive ploy to soothe the public's
concerns about this toxic sweetener.
Since the USDA is controlled by politicians and lobbyists, it cannot
be trusted to follow through to protect any of its regulatory
policies.
The NOP is a division within the USDA in
charge of regulating the USDA Certified Organic products, labeling,
enforcement etc. Considering the size of this division in comparison
to the amount of organic food they regulate, NOP standards are
arguably as lax and useless as USDA's conventional foods. The
employees that enforce NOP standards know this very well.
Bottom Line: Don't trust USDA organic foods and confide in local
farms with reputable practices.
Where Do We Go
From Here?
Due to corporate greed, it is becoming quite apparent that the
entire food supply is becoming one toxic wasteland that none of us
can rely on. We need to support local farms and move our sustenance
back to sustainable farming practices that benefit the population
rather than harm it.
If you're still consuming processed foods with artificial
sweeteners, you are gambling with your long-term well being.
There are no corporations that serve
agribusiness that can be trusted to safeguard public health, and the
regulatory agencies that are officially in charge of that mandate
are in bed with them.
Where does that leave the safety of the
food industry? I think you can figure that one out.
Sources
|