by Dave Mihalovic
January 07, 2015
from PreventDisease Website
Dave Mihalovic is a Naturopathic Doctor who specializes in vaccine research, cancer prevention and a natural approach to treatment.
by Dave Mihalovic
January 07, 2015
from PreventDisease Website
Preventing disease doesn't make
money, but treating disease certainly does.
Who would ever suspect a Doctor of faking a diagnosis to collect money. It's unconscionable. Yet it happens with cancer and almost every disease that medical doctors can generate income through kickbacks and commissions based on the volume of patients treated with specific pharmaceuticals.
Like anything people are used as a commodity.
In each admission, he uttered these words:
Fata was charged with running a $35-million Medicare fraud scheme that involved billing the government for medically unnecessary oncology and hematology treatments.
The government says Fata ran the scheme from 2009 to the present, through his medical businesses, including Michigan Hematology Oncology Centers, with offices in Clarkston, Bloomfield Hills, Lapeer, Sterling Heights, Troy and Oak Park.
According to the government, Fata had a patient load of 1,200 people and received $62 million from Medicare; he billed for more than $150 million.
U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade said she plans to seek life in prison for Fata, calling his case is "the most egregious" health care fraud case her office has seen.
She said Fata not only bilked the
government - which is typical in such cases - but he also harmed
A prostate (PSA) blood test looks for prostate-specific antigen, a protein produced by the prostate gland. High levels are supposedly associated with prostate cancer. The problem is that the association isn't always correct, and when it is, the prostate cancer isn't necessarily deadly.
Only about 3 percent of all men die from prostate cancer.
The PSA test usually leads to overdiagnosis - biopsies and treatment in which the side effects are impotence and incontinence. Repeated biopsies may spread cancer cells into the track formed by the needle, or by spilling cancerous cells directly into the bloodstream or lymphatic system.
More than 90% of Doctors who
encourage cancer treatment for prostate cancer will generate a
commission from each treatment the patient receives. It proves
risky and often deadly in the long run for most people who don't
understand how to take care of their health and are persuaded by
In over 97% of the cases this cancer
either never spreads outside of the gland to cause harm or the
patient dies of something else long before any evidence of
cancer spreading outside of the prostate occurs. In that 3%
where cancer is aggressive and harms the patient, it has already
spread beyond the limits of surgical resection long before
discovery; thus, these men are not helped by surgery either.
Unfortunately, too many doctors fail
to keep the welfare of their customers at the forefront, as
their main concern. The needs to boost their own egos,
self-preservation, and the quest for more money often result in
inappropriate care and harm to the patient.
Despite no evidence ever having supported any recommendations made for regular periodic screening and mammography at any age, malicious recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging (SBI) and the American College of Radiology (ACR) on breast cancer screening are now suggesting that breast cancer screening should begin at age 40 and earlier in high-risk patients.
Published in the Journal of the American College of Radiology (JACR), the recommendations released by the SBI and ACR state that the average patient should begin annual breast cancer screening at age 40.
They also target women in their 30s
if they are considered "high risk" as they stated.
Most chemotherapy patients either die or are plagued with illness within 10-15 years after treatment.
Patients basically live in a permanent state of disease until their death.
industry marginalizes safe and effective cures while promoting
their patented, expensive, and toxic remedies whose risks far
exceed any benefit. This is what they do best, and they
do it because it makes money, plain and simple.
They could never show the public the true 97% statistical failure rate in treating long-term metastatic cancers.
If they did publish the long-term statistics for all cancers administered cytotoxic chemotherapy, that is 10+ years and produced the objective data on rigorous evaluations including the cost-effectiveness, impact on the immune system, quality of life, morbidity and mortality, it would be very clear to the world that chemotherapy makes little to no contribution to cancer survival at all.
No such study has ever been
conducted by independent investigators in the history of
chemotherapy. The only studies available come from industry
funded institutions and scientists and none of them have ever
inclusively quantified the above variables.
The cancer establishment must retreat from the truth to treat cancer because there will never be any profit for them in in eradicating the disease. There is no governing body in the world that protects consumers from being subjected to these toxic therapies or even known carcinogens in our foods our environment, because that too, will prevent the profits from rolling in.
It's a business of mammoth proportions and must be treated as such.
The most powerful anti-carcinogenic plants in the world such as cannabis must be demonized and be made illegal because they are so effective at killing cancer cells without side effects.
Cannabinoids are so efficient at treating disease,
U.S. Government patented them in 2003.
A "magic bullet" would cost the drug
companies hundreds of billions of dollars, and patients would
have less hospitalization and less doctor visits, etc.
Actually, bring up DMSO to any oncologist and most of them won't even talk to you about it.
DMSO is a natural product,
cannot be patented and cannot be made profitable because it is
produced by the ton in the wood industry.
We will claim they are outlaws, banish them and tarnish their reputations based on a perception that a healthy person should never be unnecessarily subjected to chemotherapy for money.
So we can harshly judge and legally prosecute the Doctor who falsely prescribes poison to a healthy person for money, but we proudly accept the Doctor who prescribes poison to an unhealthy person for money.
I find that truly mind blowing.