|
by Scott Morefield
April 04,
2012
from
NaturalNews Website
|
Scott received his MBA from East Tennessee State
University in 1998 and married his wife, Kim, in
2002. They live in the hills of east Tennessee with
their four small children. Scott and Kim blog about
parenting, marriage, healthy lifestyle, nutrition, and
homesteading at
www.amorefieldlife.com
|
Since the Dark Ages when
the black plague swept through Europe, few
diseases in human history have elicited such a deadly combination of
fear and ignorance.
In this modern age full
of the wonders of technology, cancer is our greatest fear, and our
greatest unknown. A UK poll found the highest percentage of
respondents, one in five, feared cancer over anything else,
including Alzheimer's, heart attack, or job loss.
Even more disturbing,
fully a third believed whether they got cancer or not was up to
fate, that there was nothing they could do to reduce the risk.
A foundation
of sand
To exacerbate the problem, a recent Reuters article admits that
recent cancer research is unreliable at best, if not completely
fraudulent.
C. Glenn Begley,
former head of global cancer research at Amgen Inc., chose 53
'landmark' publications for his team to double-check and build on
for future drug development. Out of the original 53, he was only
able to replicate six.
Scientists at Bayer
conducted a similar project and were only able to reproduce less
than a quarter of the 47 cancer projects they had previously
conducted.
Begley wrote in the
journal Nature,
"It was shocking.
These are the studies the pharmaceutical industry relies on to
identify new targets for drug development. But if you're going
to place a $1 million or $2 million or $5 million bet on an
observation, you need to be sure it's true. As we tried to
reproduce these papers we became convinced you can't take
anything at face value."
Meanwhile, the
pharmaceutical industry, always looking to profit from the public's
fear and ignorance, continues to develop cancer drugs, usually based
on fewer than half a dozen research publications that are
pseudo-scientific at best.
Then, the
Big
Medical/Big Government mafia continues to play God by pushing these
'treatments' on sick people as if they are the only option.
97 percent of cancer research money goes into treatments and early
detection, while the other 3 percent is invested in fighting the
causes of cancer. Logic dictates that to truly fight a disease, the
cause should be removed. A great example of this is the Western
cholera epidemic of the 1800s. With no knowledge of germs or
antibiotics, the problem was traced to what seemed to be the most
logical cause, contaminated water sources.
Once these were removed,
the cholera receded. Dr. David Servan-Schreiber, a founding
board member of Doctors Without Borders, wrote,
"It is ironic to
think that if we had had antibiotics at the time, and had
counted on them to deal with the disease as we count today on
anticancer treatments, we might never have controlled cholera."
Unfortunately today's
powers-that-be aren't moved by logic, only profit.
It doesn't take a pharmaceutical rep or a rocket scientist to
understand that cancer is caused by environmental factors. The most
common cancers are far more prevalent in the West, not Asia, yet
when Asians move here they are just as prone.
It is true that cancer
runs in families, except that adopted children often share the
cancer of their adoptive, not biological parents.
People who eat or avoid
specific foods are more or less prone to cancer, as are those
exposed to certain chemicals for certain lengths of time.
-
If cancer
is caused by environmental factors, could it not be cured removing
those factors and giving the body's immune system the nutrients it
needs to fight off the cancer?
-
It may not be as
profitable, but might it save more lives?
The foundation of the modern cancer industrial complex is built on
sand, and it's starting to crumble. And now,
the mainstream media
has openly admitted that the research the pharmaceutical companies
rely on can no longer be trusted.
How long before the public wakes up?
Sources
|