On this slide we show the
impact of scalar defenses against an adversary who possesses only the
orthodox nuclear weapons and delivery systems, and makes a "first
strike" by surprise against his opponent.
In this case, the attacked opponent has scalar EM defenses.
With just the midcourse and terminal scalar EM howitzer defenses,
almost all of the attacking missiles and re-entry vehicles are
destroyed.
If for some reason (such as to prevent triggering the sun and destroying
the world inadvertently!) the attacked adversary does not wish to attack
strategically with scalar EM weapons, he may now launch a massive
retaliatory strike on his opponent.
And if that opponent has no ABM defenses, he's just bought the farm.
What a funny coincidence! Long ago, we crazy Americans chose to put all
our eggs in the offensive basket. That is, we thought the Soviets cannot
dare to strike us because we will have enough surviving missiles to
penetrate any orthodox defense and destroy them in return. They would
also have the same "mutual assured destruction (MAD)"
capability, of course!
The MAD concept was aptly acronymmed -- it was an insane idea from its
inception. That is, the Soviets were not supposed to defend their cities
and populace, and neither were we. That way, you see, we could destroy
their citizenry at will, and they could destroy ours at will. We
deliberately agreed to that, thinking -- in our insanity -- that the
Soviets agreed also.
Of course the Soviets weren't playing the same lunatic's game at all.
They simply fed our own garbage back to us, and we importantly thought
we were negotiating something. Unknown to us, they were secretly
building and deploying scalar EM defenses even then. Since
we didn't know of any other defense, we assumed the Soviets could not
defend their citizenry with ABMs any better than we could defend ours
with ABMs. So we blithely scrapped our ABMs.
The high government officials of the United States of America grossly
violated our constitution and their sworn oaths of office. Our
constitution specifically charges the government of the United States to
defend the people of the United States. That means our officials are
specifically charged with defending our people. Yet they deliberately
agreed not to do so, and they deliberately sacrificed us in advance.
They committed treason of the highest kind, by deliberately surrendering
us to total destruction anytime the big balloon goes up.
The constitution doesn't charge the government with surrendering our
citizens to destruction under any circumstances. It charges the
government with defending us against destruction.
Ronald Reagan is the first U.S. president in some time to see
through the MAD concept. At least he stands forthrightly
for defense. It's just a shame that the government and scientific
leaders under him aren't aware of the Soviet scalar weapon developments,
so they could brief him on these startling developments.
Be sure you understand what the government leaders before Reagan
have been saying. For years, our official policy has effectively said to
the Russians: "We will allow each side a token defense only. We
deliberately will not defend ourselves, so that anytime you decide to
strike us you can destroy us. In return, however, we do not think you
will want to strike us, for we believe that -- before we become ashes
from that strike -- we can get enough away at you, to destroy you as
well. Of course we believe you are in the same sort of boat."
Then we said, "There! That's settled! What a relief! nobody can strike
anybody anymore. Now can we talk about partial disarmament and on-site
inspection?"
The Soviets just kept their astonished amusement to themselves and kept
building scalar defenses (and scalar offenses as well !). Their
deception plan called for imbedding the scalar EM weapons in ordinary
systems when possible, and hiding the scalar EM weapons tests in
ordinary weapons tests when possible. Of course they had to be adamant
in their opposition to on-site inspection; after all, even Western
scientists, if allowed on site with the dual-mode weapons, might suspect
something was different and possibly things were amiss.
The Soviet deception has worked like a charm. The U.S. MADmen who
created and implemented the MAD doctrine have succeeded in prejudicing
two generations of academicians and elected U.S. leaders against the
need for effective defense. A vast wasteland of inane paper studies --
learnedly dealing with ABM's, penetration tactics, leakage, force and
counterforce, radar blackout, electronic warfare, etc. etc. -- has been
churned out by our military, industrial, and university "think tanks" to
clog the minds, efforts, and literature of our defense and governmental
establishments.
Our homeland has no effective ABM defense (and very little
defense against aircraft or subsonic cruise missiles). Our field army
has no effective ABM defense (or air defense). Our naval forces have no
effective ABM defense (although they are better defended against air
attack than the field army). Yet ballistic missiles -- and to some
extent cruise missiles -- have supposedly been our greatest threat for
decades, followed closely by the secondary threat of massed aircraft
attack.
A cynic might take the stand that, if our Defense Department hasn't been
allowed to defend us (with deployed weapon systems, not by "paper
studies") against what we ourselves have proclaimed is our biggest
threat, then why is it called the Defense Department? Why not call it
the No-defense Department?
Understand, a great many fine, hard-working people in DoD
have certainly tried to get adequate defenses developed and deployed.
The sheer weight of the bureaucracy and its mind-numbing entanglements
have prevented it.
But it's even worse. Our bureaucrats -- both in government and in "big,
organized science" -- have been so caught up in the "Russians are really
just ignorant peasants" syndrome and the "not-invented-here" (NIH)
syndrome that they've not recognized the greatest scientific and
technical breakthrough in history. Such a breakthrough - far greater in
importance that the nuclear bomb - has been made, developed, and
deployed by the Soviet Union, all in secrecy and behind the smokescreen
of a masterful deception plan.
We've totally missed the most incredible "secret superweapons"
development program of all times, and the worldwide testing of the
weapons themselves.
Hiroshima and Nagasaki should serve as object lessons in
the price of ignorance of such technological breakthroughs.
History does repeat itself. But this time it's not we Americans who got
the great new superweapon first.
