by Elizabeth Young
May 2011
from
ThePeoplesVoice Website
911 is without a doubt the most written about,
analyzed, discussed, conspiracy in the history of mankind. Yes even the
official story:
Nineteen fanatical Arab hijackers, masterminded by an evil genius named
Osama bin Laden, crashed airplanes into important buildings in the N.E.
sector in the United States because they “hate our freedoms”
Is a conspiracy between
Osama Bin Laden (who isn’t even wanted by the FBI
[1q]) and the Arab terrorists who the U.S. government claims hijacked planes
and crashed them in to important buildings in the N.E. sector in the United
States.
“Conspiracy” is a REAL word for a REAL act that has existed in human
societies in all cultures throughout human history. If conspiracies did not
exist, we would not have a word for it.
The problem that we face today is
that the US Government has arrogated to itself a singular role as a
political pontificate that believes that it and its agents in the Justice
Department, alone, constitute the only “person” (corporate person) on this
Earth who is allowed to use the word “conspiracy” as it employs the charge
of “conspiracy” every week in trials to put both guilty and innocent people
in jail while deriding and discrediting all others who employ the word as
“conspiracy theorists.” Paris Flammonde [2q]
There are inside, outside and even an outside inside-space story (conspiracy
theory) about what really happened on 911.
Test your knowledge of the September 11, 2001 stories.
See if you can spot,
-
The Terrorist Job (the story)
-
The Inside Job (Global Domination - the story
behind the story)
-
The Exotic Weapon story (another story behind the story)
-
The Metaphysical story (the story behind the story behind the story
behind the story!)
Question 1 for 9/11 Smarties
What Really Happened on September 11, 2001?
May 4, 2011
Question 1
What really happened on September 11, 2001?
-
Option 1 - Nineteen fanatical Arab hijackers, masterminded by an evil genius
named Osama bin Laden, crashed airplanes into the World Trade Center because
they “hate our freedoms.”
-
Option 2 - The Bush administration was asleep at the switch and allowed
nineteen fanatical Arab hijackers to kill 3,000 American citizens so they
could pass the Patriot Act, build up the military and invade Afghanistan and
Iraq (the LIHOP, Let it Happen on Purpose version).
Or Bush, Cheney, and the Neocons killed 3,000 Americans so they could pass the Patriot Act, build up
the military and invade Afghanistan and Iraq, (the MIHOP Made it Happen on
Purpose version), AKA as an “Inside Job.”
Conclusion: 9/11 was a Neocon Aka
The Powers That Be (TPTB, a non-conspiracy acronym) “controlled demolition”
Inside Job, like a New Pearl Harbor,
www.newamericancentury. [3q]
-
That so many influential figures in and close to the Bush White House had
expressed, just a year before the attacks, the need for a “new Pearl Harbor”
before their militarist ambitions could be fulfilled, is so obviously meant
to convince you it was an inside Job you would conclude the public
statements, found at the PNAC website were planned [planted] by the CIA at
the same time as the 911 Truth Movement.
The THAT Coincidence Theorist’s
Guide to 9/11
Dick, Donald, and Paul wanted to make
quadruple sure that everyone believed
9/11 was a catastrophic and catalyzing event - the “transformation” of the
U.S. military into an imperialistic force of global domination - so the Neocons put their plan on the PNAC website.
There was concern that that no
one would visit the site so Cheney came up with a brilliant plan: 9/11 would
be the day the military would conduct a simulation of terrorist hijacking
planes and flying them into important buildings in the N.E. sector of the
United States (Vigilant Guardian). [4q]
The 9/11 Commission stumbled across strong evidence of treason by Dick
Cheney when it interviewed Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta, who
was present in Cheney’s famous command bunker as Flight 77 sped toward
Washington, DC. [5q]
-
Option 3 - The Military Industrial
Complex demonstrated a
directed energy
weapon (DEW) that, according to Dr. Judy Wood, used “an amazing advanced
technology” as sort of a “Ha, ha you dummies, look what we have, that you
want, but we won’t give you.”
Dr. Wood, former professor of mechanical engineering with expertise in
material science, concludes the buildings were destroyed using some type of
“field effect technology” related to the Hutchison Effect and the presence
of Hurricane Erin.
However, if Dr. Wood were to be asked what would be the motive of the U.S.
government to have tested/used a energy directed weapon on 9/11, she might
respond:
But we have a choice. And this choice is real. Live happily ever after or
destroy the planet. This is why I have been pursuing the issues of 9/11.
These issues are central to it all. 9/11 was a demonstration of free-energy
technology.
-
Option 4 - TPTB that include
Bush, Cheney, and the Neocons, did knowingly,
intentionally, willfully and maliciously conspire, combine and agree
together to conduct a Metaphysical Catechism (Test) of the Earth.
-
TPTB, armed with the lost knowledge from the ancient world Atlantis, in a
metaphysical struggle, were using humans to weaken the earth (until October
of 2008) with environmental damage and pollution.
The Question of Questions
“Environmental Damage and Pollution Are the Goal and Not the Unintended
Consequence of Our Consumer (shopping) Society.”
Dem Bones is Connected To
De Debt Bone
It was the object of the conspiracy to determine if the earth was
sufficiently weakened, so TPTB could take over and begin the transition to a
One World Government and New World Order on 9/12. If you are not a familiar
with the works of F.W. Engdahl and the reality of a New World Order
conspiracy, visit the CIA controlled Globalresearch.ca website. [4b]
Question 2 for 9/11 Smarties
Where did the energy come from on September
11, 2001?
May 5, 2011
Question 2
Where did the energy come from that could explain:
1) the
toasted cars, the instant disappearance of people
2) how two 110-story
buildings and one 47 story building, approximately 50 million tons of mass,
of which about 40 million NEVER hit the ground and turned largely to dust
i.e., the molecular dissociation of steel beams and concrete?
-
Option 1 - Two Boeing jumbo jets fully loaded with jet fuel, which is
basically kerosene that burns at about 400c, on 9/11 took on the qualities
of an explosive demolition agent.
-
Option 2 - Prior to August 17, 2010, the explanation from the Joneses
(Steven and Alex) was Thermite/thermate/super-thermate, AKA controlled
demolition, the old “9/11 Truth.”
On August 17 and September 18, several CIA-controlled websites call the
Joneses liars and now report “We cannot blame the highly unconventional
Ground Zero devastation on thermite/thermate/super-thermate and ‘controlled
demolition’ any more than we can blame it on ‘jet fuel’ or ‘box cutters’.”
The new “9/11 Truth” is that a directed energy weapon (DEW) or a mini-nuke
ate the Twin Towers.
Pakalert and other popular conspiracy websites finally admitted what
legitimate researchers have been saying for years. There never had been
direct evidence for the use of thermite. No photographic evidence and no
“steam explosion” when rain fell on the area where molten metal was supposed
to have been (in the immediate period following the destruction of the WTC).
Watch below a 2007 presentation by Dr. Judy Wood that contradicts
the Jones’ molten metal hypothesis for WTC 1 & 2.
Part 1
-
Option 3 - A directed energy weapon
(DEW) developed at taxpayer expense [as should have been known] by SAIC, ARA and Boeing (the NIST contractors), was
demonstrated on 9/11. This super-secret technology has been kept out of the
public view and “in the realm of the incredible.”
-
“This (9/11) requires very sophisticated beam weapons
- huge amounts of
energy. Well, huge amounts of energy - much more than chemical explosives
would release.”
Independent Scientist Leuren Moret
The demonstration, according to Independent Scientist
Leuren Moret, and
attorney Alfred Webre:
-
Overwhelming evidence exists that the collapses of the Twin Towers and
Building 7 were instances of controlled demolition, and/or of the
application of exotic weapons such as land-based, air-based or possible
space-based Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) or
HAARP. [7q]
Dr. Judy Wood:
-
“I don’t know if it’s the exact same thing as the
Hutchison
Effect, but what I’ve learned from this is that… here is something that does
the same thing that we see…”
in an interview with Alfred Webre in 2008, John
Hutchison expressed his wish for the technology to be disclosed and that his
method of “doing this” is to appear in TV documentaries about the subject
and talk about his work and experiments.
Andrew Johnson has suggested that Leuren Moret and Alfred Webre had
deliberately tried to muddle up the evidence with a discussion of HAARP
being used to destroy the World Trade Centre Towers.
-
Option 4 - The easiest way to understand where the energy came from on
September 11 is to imagine an Arm Wrestling match, considered by many to be
the ultimate test of strength, between TPTB and the Earth with the legs of
the Arm Wrestling table the North and South Tower.
Arm Wrestling is a battle of leverage, and the strategies and techniques
depend on the location and time of the Arm Wrestling match.
On 9/11, TPTB failed to demonstrate good sportsmanship when they violated
rules from the American Metaphysical Armsport Association: Rules, Conducts
and Manners manual.
TPTB are known for using the Sidemore strategy:
-
“I never, ever, ever go to the inside on a bigger guy. The reason is that if
I cannot take him down immediately then he can probably throw his weight
into the match and pin me in a heartbeat. To me a quick surge of
backpressure is the only way to go. Finger attacks are the way to go. ”
Mark Sidemore
Question 3 for 9/11 Smarties
Why was The 2001 Invasion of Iraq called off
on September 11, 2001?
May 6, 2011
Question 3
Why was The 2001 Invasion of Iraq called off 5 hours after the
2nd tower was destroyed? The USS Carl Vinson was in the Persian Gulf with
orders to invade Iraq.
Logic would dictate the invasion would go forward
when the buildings were destroyed and not be called off. [10b]
-
Option 1 - Even though the terrorists were all from Saudi Arabia, they were
worried the U.S. would retaliate and invade Iraq. The terrorists were also
concerned the U.S. might even claim Sadaam had WMDs and a connection to
9/11. So they hacked the White House secure line to the Carl Vinson and
called the invasion off 5 hours after the second tower collapsed (and turned
largely to dust).
-
Option 2 - On 9/11, Bush traveling on Air Force One going to? Washington D.C.
on when he received a phone call from some highly-placed moles within the
administration that threatened “Angel is next” (Angel is the codeword for
Air Force One) unless you call off the invasion of Iraq.
-
Option 3 - The Military Industrial Complex does not have the authority to
issue an order to stand down, only the president or the Joint Chiefs of
Staff can do such an abominable thing (of course they did it 18 months
later, but
that’s another story).
-
Option 4 - 10:28:31 a.m. When the Earth was declared the winner and the Arm
Wrestling table leg of the North Tower collapsed, TPTB were defeated and
therefore the invasion of the cradle of civilization and the start of a New
World Order was called off. And if you need more proof TPTB accepted defeat,
what did George W. Bush tell us do on 9/12? Answer: “Go Shopping.”
Question 4 for 9/11 Smarties
Why didn’t the column failures in building 7 make any
noise on September 11, 2001?
May 7, 2011
Question 4
Why didn’t the column failures in the buildings result in a
sound level of at least 130 dB [decibels] to 140 dB at a distance of at
least half a mile (witnesses did not report hearing such a loud noise, nor
is one audible on recordings of the collapse)? [13q]
-
Option 1 - When kerosene (jet fuel) takes on the qualities of an explosive
demolition agent it doesn’t make an audible sound.
-
Option 2 - Thermite/thermate/super-thermate makes a lot of noise when it
explodes, which may explain why on September 18, 2010, the CIA admitted “we
cannot blame the highly unconventional Ground Zero devastation on
‘controlled demolition’ any more than we can blame it on “jet fuel” or “box
cutters.” Inexplicably, in the same breath, the CIA goes on to Muddle Up (an
advanced cover up) and blames the “collapse” on a DEW or a mini-nuke.
-
Option 3 - The operators in charge of testing the DEW forgot their ear plugs
so they had the device set to mute. On 9/11 when they set the simulation
mode to “Las Vegas type Demolition” they forgot to turn the sound back on.
-
Option 4 - The American Metaphysical Armsport Association requires
competitors wrestle in silence so as not to disturb the neighbors during a
competition.
Question 5 for 9/11 Smarties
What would be the explanation for the damage or lack
of damage to WTC 3, 4, 5, 6 on September 11, 2001?
May 8, 2011
Question 5
What would be (is) the explanation for the
damage or lack of damage to WTC 3, 4, 5, 6 and the surrounding
structures.
(Vertical round holes were cut into buildings 4, 5, 6, and a
cylindrical arc into Bankers Trust. However, there was no damage to the Verizon
building or the US post office)? [8q]
-
Option 1 - When kerosene (jet fuel)
takes on the qualities of an explosive demolition agent it doesn’t
affect the surrounding structures.
-
Option 2 - The damage to the surrounding
structures could never have been caused by Thermite/thermate/super-thermate
which may explain why on September 18, 2010 the CIA admitted “we
cannot blame the highly unconventional Ground Zero devastation on
‘controlled demolition’ any more than we can blame it on “jet fuel”
or “box cutters.” Inexplicably, in the same breath, the CIA goes on
to Muddle Up (an advanced cover up) and blames the “collapse” on a
DEW or a mini-nuke.
-
Option 3 - Line of sight. If the DEW was
fired at WTC 7 from ground level that would explain why WTC 3, 4, 5,
6 and the Bankers Trust would be in the line of sight and the
Verizon building and the US post office would not. [8q]
Question 6 for 9/11 Smarties
Why was Building 7, that wasn’t hit by a plane,
demolished 8 hours after the second tower collapsed on September 11, 2001?
May 10, 2011
Question 6
Why was Building 7, that wasn’t hit by a
plane, demolished 8 hours after the second tower collapsed in what
appeared to be a Las Vegas Hotel demolition type collapse?
-
Option 1 - Assumes 9/11 was a MIHOP and
therefore there would be no terrorist explanation.
-
Option 2 - Two reasons: 1) The Neocons
were acting on behalf of the Corporations being investigated by the
SEC and wanted to destroy the files stored at WTC 7 (People are
still trying to figure why the Neocons had to destroy a 47 story
building to get rid of 10,000 documents) and 2) It was a huge case
of reverse insurance fraud on the part of Larry Silverstein. [3b]
-
Option 3 - Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld
and Paul Wolfowitz were busy on the morning of 9/11 and missed the
DEW demonstration. The military agreed to a second demonstration 8
hours later.
-
Option 4 - Building 7 was a dual smoking
Russian Doll “look-the-other way, cover up.” The first time,
Building 7 was a “controlled-demolition-smoking-gun”, promoted by
Steven Jones on the MSNBC Tucker Carlson show:
JONES: “What I’m doing, Tucker
(Carlson), is presenting evidence, but it’s a hypothesis to be
tested. That’s a big difference from a conclusion, and so I just
wanted to clarify that. But to sum up, I have looked at the
official reports by
FEMA, and so on… regarding the collapse
of-yes, of these buildings. … I’d like to look at the collapse
of building 7, that was not even hit by a jet.
CARLSON: The two towers [he does not mention WTC 7]: the
explanation has been that the fire inside was so intense that it
weakened the structural steel and that each floor collapsed down
upon the next in a pancake fashion, and they imploded in on
themselves. That’s essentially, I think, what people think.
JONES: I would like to do a little experiment with you, Tucker,
if I could. I sent out a video clip of the collapse of Building
7, because most people haven’t actually seen that one, and
that’s the crux of the argument.
CARLSON: Can you sum up very quickly the argument for us? You
believe there were explosives in the buildings planted by
someone, detonated?
JONES: Well, yes, it’s a hypothesis to be tested… There are two
hypotheses here. One is fire and damage caused all three
buildings to collapse. The other is that explosives in the
buildings may have caused the collapse. And so, then we analyze
and see which fits the data better, and I’ve done that in my
25-page paper.
CARLSON: I want to read you a quote from the “Deseret Morning
News,” a paper in Utah, from you. I’m quoting now. “It is quite
plausible that explosives were pre-planted in all three
buildings and set off after the two plane crashes, which are
actually a diversion tactic. Muslims are probably not to blame
for bringing down the World Trade Center buildings after all.”
That’s, I would think, pretty offensive to a lot of the people
listening. Do you have any evidence for that?
JONES: I really want to do this experiment with you.
CARLSON: We don’t have a lot of time for experiments, Professor.
But if you could just … give us one thing to hold onto. How you
make these claims, or appear to make these claims …
JONES: Tucker, sure, sure. Let’s start with the collapse of
Building 7. Can you roll the video clip that I sent to you?
CARLSON: OK. I am not sure if we can, but that is the World
Trade Center. It’s smaller than the other two; it was not hit by
a plane. Of course, it collapsed.
JONES: Right. It’s 47 stories, twenty-four steel columns in the
center, trusses, and asymmetrically supported. Now, I can’t see
what you’re seeing. Are we rolling that? Just the building
CARLSON: No. We just see the building. And just so our viewers
know, the explanation that I think is conventional is that there
was a large tank of diesel fuel stored in the lower level of
that, which caught fire, and the resulting fire collapsed the
building.
JONES: Well, that’s basically it, yes, but as we read in the
FEMA report, it says here, and I put this in my paper, of
course. “The best hypothesis which is the only one they looked
at, fire, has only a low probability of occurrence. Further
investigation analyses are needed to resolve this issue and I
agree with that.”
But they admit there’s only a low probability, and if you look
at the collapse, you see what I have studied is the fall time,
the symmetry, the fact that it first dips in the middle. That’s
called the kink, which is very characteristic, of course, of
controlled demolition.
CARLSON: Professor, I am sorry that we are out of time …
JONES: Whoa, one other thing I want to mention: molten metal in
the basements of all three buildings, and yet all scientists now
reasonably agree that the fires were not sufficiently hot to
melt the steel, so what is this molten metal? It’s direct
evidence for the use of high-temperature explosives, such as
thermite, which produces molten iron as an end product. People
will read the paper, then I talk about the molten metal, the
symmetry of the collapse, and the weakness and inadequacies of
the fire hypothesis.
JONES: Thank you, Tucker
MSNBC airs the smoking gun bomb-shell from Jones, i.e.,
“The
best hypothesis for WTC 7, which is the only one they looked at,
fire, has only a low probability of occurrence.”
The viewer, after seeing the kink, the
symmetry and remembering the collapse of the Sands Hotel in Las
Vegas comes to the inescapable conclusion that the Neocons used
Thermite/thermate/super thermate to demolish WTC 7 and by
association 1 and 2.
When the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
released its
report on the collapse of World Trade 7 in 2005,
investigators looked specifically at the possibility of explosives
and wrote:
“Hypothetical blast events did not
play a role in the collapse of WTC 7 and investigators “found no
evidence whose explanation required invocation of a blast event.
Moreover, the smallest charge capable of initiating column
failure would have resulted in a sound level of 130 dB
[decibels] to 140 dB at a distance of at least half a mile.
Witnesses did not report hearing such a loud noise, nor is one
audible on recordings of the collapse.”
The Controlled Demolition theory/cover
up worked for 8+ years but then TPTB got nervous. Someone was
looking into an alternate (Metaphysical) explanation, and therefore
out came the DEW/mini-nuke smoking gun.
But nota bene, there is an important difference between the Smoking
Guns. Smoking Gun #1, the theory of controlled demolition is false
for all three buildings, but a theory of a DEW, Smoking Gun #2, is
true for WTC 7 but false for WTC 1 and 2.
Dr. Judy Wood’s research confirms a DEW was used to make the impact
holes in the Twin Towers and to demolish WTC 7 (without making a
sound), but an argument can be made that a DEW explanation cannot
explain the collapse of the WTC 1 and 2 because:
WTC 7 was a bottom-up gravity-assisted collapse with a small debris
field, while WTC 1 and 2 were primarily top-down, virtually
unassisted by gravity and showered debris in a wide radius as their
frames essentially “peeled” outward.
FEMA: WTC Study, Ch. 5 (05/02)
Look at
Figures 87, 88 and 89. The WTC 1 and 2 rubble pile was far
too small to account for the mass, unlike that of WTC 7.
And finally in order to believe a DEW was responsible for all three
collapses, you would have to believe the DEW had an option to
simulate either a Las Vegas Hotel or an atomic explosion/ geothermal
collapse.
The DEW or a mini-nuke Smoking Gun #2 story works just as well if
not better than the controlled demolition story, because A DEW was
in fact used on 9/11 to make the impact holes in the Twin Towers and
to demolish WTC 7 (without making a sound).
Click here to read why a Directed Electromagnetic Energy Weapons
Theory (DEW) of the WTC 1 and 2 cannot be true.
Click here to read
why a theory that radiant energy projectiles falling through core
shafts of the WTC 1 and 2 cannot be true. [9q]
The recent disclosure from the
CIA controlled sites of a Directed
Energy Weapon (DEW) and mini-nuke story for 1, 2 and 7, can only be
for two reasons:
-
Alex Jones is the “Minister of Truth” over a flock of “Truthers,”
whose church is the “9/11 Truth Movement.” Pastor Jones is a member
of
Project Mockingbird, Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor and alternative
Media Gatekeeper for the Vatican:
Alex Jones Jesuit Temporal
Coadjutor CIA Disinformation Agent.
-
9/11 ‘Truth’ was planned simultaneously with 9/11 itself. That is
why you have so many conflicting stories, points of view, arguments
and discussions, etc.
The trolls were pre-ordained and planned. So
were all the major websites (e.g., 911Truth.org, Infowars and
Rense.com (Participation in Overinformation, Misinformation as
Disinformation, or
Who is Jeff Rense?). “It is a known fact that any
grouping of five or more will be infiltrated.” – Veronica Chapman,
Truther [6b]
And on September 18, 2010, The Powers That Be (TPTB, a
non-conspiracy acronym [3q]) had a change of heart (or maybe grew a
conscience) and directed their agents, in this case PakAlert and the
CIA, to tell the common man the “truth” about what really happened:
that is, it was mini-nuke/Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) instead of
controlled demolition that caused the Twin Towers to collapse and
turn largely to dust (the building materials did not hit the ground
in solid form) on 9/11.
Unlikely.
Click here to read a 9-point
refutation of the idea that nuclear devices were used to destroy the
WTC buildings.
In other words:
-
The unproven theory of controlled demolition was the story behind a
jet fuel (kerosene) fire.
-
DEW is the story behind the theory of controlled demolition.
-
The Metaphysical Catechism (Test) is the story behind the DEW.
[Appendix A]
And finally the DEW or a mini-nuke disclosure really doesn’t change
anything: it’s still an Inside Job, now it’s an Inside DEW/mini-nuke
Job. [10q]
The limited disclosure of a DEW explanation from a CIA-controlled
site is a tacit admission that 9/11 was a Metaphysical Catechism
(Test) of the Earth. [Appendix B]
Question 7 for 9/11 Smarties
Why was Hurricane Erin off the coast of NY on 9/11 and
why did the Earth’s magnetic field “dip” on September 11, 2001?
May 11, 2011
Question 7
Why was Hurricane Erin off the coast of NY
on 9/11 and why did the Earth’s magnetic field “dip” at 8:46 a.m.?
(The
new pictorial study which also relates to Field Effects notes that
Hurricane Erin was “born” on about 1 September 2001, and travelled up
towards NYC. Hurricane Erin was the closest to NYC on 9/11/01 and was
the largest on this date (although wind speeds were greater the day
before)
-
Option 1 - When kerosene (jet fuel)
takes on the qualities of an explosive demolition agent it causes
Hurricanes and the Earth’s magnetic field to dip.
-
Option 2 - Thermite/thermate/super
thermate or a mini-nuke have never caused a Hurricane or the Earth’s
magnetic field to dip which may explain why on September 18, 2010
the CIA admitted “we cannot blame the highly unconventional Ground
Zero devastation on ‘controlled demolition’ any more than we can
blame it on “jet fuel” or “box cutters” but then inexplicably blames
(Muddles Up) the “collapse” on a DEW or a mini-nuke.
-
Option 3 - Dr. Judy Wood has posted a
study (http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/erin) which considers the
“Field and energy Effects” associated with Hurricanes involved in
the destruction of the World Trade Centre complex.
-
The relationship between 9/11, the Hutchison Effect, Field Effects
and data regarding Hurricane and Weather Modification is introduced.
No firm conclusions are drawn, data is merely presented to
illustrate where highly significant common themes and patterns seem
to be present.
For example, a short comparison is drawn between some
of the effects seen with the materials in collision (caused by the
effects of Tornados and hurricanes) with the anomalous changes in
materials seen with the Hutchison Effect. Apparent levitation
effects seen in some instances are also highlighted. [From a 2008
press release]
http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/erin/.
More at
http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html).
Earlier, in January 2008, Dr. Wood posted a study, co-authored by
John Hutchison on her website which relates effects seen in
photographs taken before, during and after the destruction of the
WTC complex, to effects seen in Hutchison’s ongoing experiments.
The development of “super cell” storms is examined and a comparison
of their structure to that of a Tesla Coil (used to create high
voltage electrical discharges) is considered. The possibility is
suggested that the electrical properties of large storm systems may
have some similarities to those of Tesla coils and that there is a
possibility that technology exists to utilise or manipulate the
energy in these storm systems for “secondary” purposes.
One of the most striking pieces of the data presented is that from a
set of magnetometers monitored by the University of Alaska. Several
instruments show significant deviations from “background” or
“normal” readings as the events of 9/11 were unfolding. A further
selection of this data is presented in relation to variations during
the hurricane seasons of 2001, 2004 and 2005.
A later part of the study examines some of the data relating to
patterns of earthquakes in 2008 and possibly associated unusual
weather patterns, which may be related to secret or partially
disclosed environmental modification technology (such as
HAARP).
However, the study does not establish any clear links between HAARP
and the events in New York on 9/11.
[From a press release by Andrew
Johnson,
www.checktheevidence.com]
-
Option 4 - The Earth’s response to the
initiation of an Arm Wrestling (in violation of rule #15032) at the
electro-magnetic grid location 40° 42' 41.3852?, -74° 0' 44.0064
(One World Trade Center) is a dip in the Earth’s magnetic field.
During the match TPTB locked the Earth in a death grip followed by
73 minutes of surges from side to side, counting on the micro
cities’ powerful electrical systems to drain the Earth’s energy.
During that time the earth perspired, which explains the presence of
Hurricane Erin off the coast of New York.
Question 8 for 9/11 Smarties
Why did two large wide-bodied aluminum jetliners not
decelerate or produce any plane wreckage on September 11, 2001?
May 12, 2011
Question 8
Americans and the future Truthers who
watched the 9/11 drama believe two large wide-bodied aluminum jetliners
crashed into the massive steel Twin Towers.
The picture on the left is
Flight 175 that doesn’t decelerate or produce any plane wreckage as it
disappears in a puff of smoke inside the South Tower.
The one on the
right, taken by a news helicopter, shows a Boeing 767 coming out the
opposite side of the impact zone of the North Tower.
 
Whether or not you believe that planes were used on 9/11, there is an
important question that needs to be asked.
Why would the perpetrators
bother to fake crashing planes into the WTC towers, requiring them to
fake all the crash videos as well when it would be much easier for them
to crash real planes into the Towers?
-
Option 1 - The two terrorists (who
learned to fly jumbo jets from reading the flight manuals found in
the cars they didn’t rent) that piloted the planes (that are still
flying and/or are for sale according to
Jeff Rense) were reported
alive as of 9/12/2001. Therefore, if you believe Arab terrorists
from Saudi Arabia masterminded 9/11, the question of planes or
noplanes is not relevant.
-
Option 2 - The Neocons were concerned
that no one would visit the PNAC website and find out it was a MIHOP
(New Pearl Harbor).
-
The thinking went something like this: Real planes (with or without
remote control/on-board computer guidance systems) flying at 470 mph
(Flight 11/North Tower) and 590 mph (Flight 175/South Tower) would
break up into a million pieces before they penetrated the buildings.
People might even believe it was Arab terrorists flying the planes
and it wasn’t an Inside Job.
As one person accurately states: it’s the penetration that
guarantees that no one will believe the “Arab Terrorists, hate our
freedom” story.
Only a computer generated imagery (CGI) of planes would guarantee
penetration into the Twin Towers before their fuel tanks exploded.
-
Option 3 - The military industrial
complex wanted to hide their demonstration behind a fake terrorist
attack on the Twin Towers. What if the military used two drone 767’s
and one of them missed the target? The DEW demo would have to be
cancelled.
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2007/05/why-they-didnt-use-planes-to-hit-wtc.html
-
Option 4 - The use of Computer-Generated
Video Graphics (CGI fakery) was an impediment to the discovery of
the Metaphysical Test of the Earth.
On 9/11/2001, TPTB engaged Mike
Rivero, a.k.a. John Wenckus, to use fake and/or doctored TV images
to create the illusion of real plane crashes at the WTC.
It was the objective of the conspiracy to create an almost
impenetrable barrier to the discovery of the Metaphysical Catechism
(Test).
Testimony of Mike Rivero:
Bugliosi: Good morning Mr. Rivero,
please tell the jury what you did before launching your website
www.whatreallyhappened.com for the CIA, and whether you are also
known as John Wenckus? CNN Removes Picture of John J. Wenckus
Rivero: Yes, I went by the name of John Wenckus when I worked
for NASA.
Bugliosi: You have admitted your part in the conspiracy to
produce the faked plane impacts with the World Trade Center
using CNN Video Fakery/Cartoon CGI.
What technical expertise qualified you for the task?
Rivero: I spent 25 years as a photo imaging expert analyst for
NASA. During that time, I consulted in Hollywood on Sci-Fi
projects and created the special effects for Star Trek, Stargate
and the ABC hit miniseries “Lost.”
Bugliosi: Please summarize for the Jury CGI Video Fakery and the
no-plane issue.
Rivero: The objective of the faked airplane crashes was to
prevent discovery of the Metaphysical Catechism (Test).
TPTB suffer from OCD when it comes to their metaphysical
struggle with the Earth; they don’t leave anything to chance. A
real and present danger existed. What if the Earth prevailed
(which it did on 9/11), and the profane (middle class) found out
about the conspiracy to use humans to weaken the Earth with
environmental damage by living in a consumer society?
Then people would stop shopping, watch
The Story of Stuff and
then go out and form sustainable living communities like
Portland City Repair.
If that happened in 2001 the TPTB would
have been defeated long before
October 29, 2008. (See
The Power of
Community and
Why was I born? Why are we here?)
The test designers built into the test a “gotcha.”
Bugliosi: Explain.
Rivero: They knew a scientist, like Dr. Judy Wood, would come
forward and debunk Steven Jones. Dr. Wood has presented a
compelling case for the collapse that explains the 1,400 cars
that were toasted in inexplicable patterns and the dip of the
Earth’s magnetic field at the precise moment of the supposed
first plane “impact.” Furthermore, she calls attention to the
presence of Hurricane Erin off the coast of New York on 9/11.
The test was designed to ensure that no one would listen to Dr.
Wood.
Bugliosi: How was that accomplished?
Rivero: They used computer-generated video graphics to fake the
plane crashes into the North and South towers, a.k.a. the
no-plane theory.
Bugliosi: I’m having trouble. What do no-planes have to do with
the no-controlled demolition of the Twin Towers?
Rivero: Actually, everything and nothing.
We knew that
investigators would quickly realize the physical
impossibility of jumbo jets, being largely aluminum, penetrating
the steel frames of the towers.
Look at this image of the second impact, taken from a news
helicopter which shows a video composite of a Boeing 767
accidentally appearing from behind a layer mask.
We knew that even an amateur researcher would figure out that
digital compositing was used to depict the plane crashes in the
news reports and subsequent amateur videos, so then we “had”
them.
Bugliosi: I am not sure the jury is following your logic.
Rivero: Everyone on the team realized a legitimate investigator
or truth seeker has integrity and a duty to report everything
they discover, even if it has no relevance or importance to the
events under investigation.
When the investigators reported on the
impossibility of a Theory of Controlled Demolition, they would also
report that no planes were flown into the Twin Towers. [12b]
Look at this statement from Morgan Reynolds:
“There were no planes, there were no
hijackers. I know, I know, I’m out of the mainstream, but that’s
the way it is. How could two large wide-bodied aluminum
jetliners penetrate massive steel towers and disappear with no
deceleration visible, no plane wreckage visible in gashes and
none knocked to the ground below the impact zone?”
Reynolds knows he is out of the
mainstream and he knows the issue is irrelevant to his discovery
that controlled demolition could never explain the collapse of the
Twin Towers.
But once he put his no-plane (foot) in his mouth, it became the
hyper-straw man by which ALL of his theories could be attacked.
[13b]
The crackpot theories like “no-planes, pods, energy weapons,
holograms,” etc., were all looked at by many of us many years ago;
we found there to be no truth to any of them and deemed them disinfo.
The WTC demolitions are proven and the official 9/11 airliner tales
are proven hogwash. This article, the beneficiary of work by many
other investigators, proves it. I await the replies of Hoffman and
other apologists to reestablish the official, albeit impossible,
airliner stories. I expect little more than obfuscation. What really
happened? I do not know. What is clear is that the government is
lying about the four reported Big Boeing crashes.
I don’t like these theories because they require a level of
technology in excess of what’s needed to do the job.
Global Hawk + nanothermite = Job Done.
The no-planers actually create the disinfo they peddle, so they’re
otherwise known as disinfo artists.
Several of them have grievances
with the 9/11 Truth movement, so that is the likely reason they
create the disinfo and try to pass it off as “9/11 Truth” to make
the movement look bad.
“The 9/11 Truth Movement served the
dual purpose of vectoring genuine truth seekers to dead ends and
branding those who questioned authority and the true nature of
reality (the Theory of Controlled Demolition) as insane.”
The Truthers, who saw “there was no
break in the building wall between the port engine and fuselage when
the 757 allegedly hit the North Tower,” were threatened with
violence and banned from conspiracy theory websites.
Everyone else in the “Truth” community kept quiet and accepted
Professor James Fetzer’s explanation:
“It’s Tactical. Even if they (the
advocates of No Plane Theory) are right, it hurts the movement. Many
feel that there is so much evidence of government complicity beyond
the issue of big passenger jets that diverting attention to the one
thing most people believe that they “saw” is not to our tactical and
strategic advantage.”
Bugliosi: Whoa, that’s a lot to take in.
Rivero: Yes, but, if you think about it, you have to appreciate the
lengths TPTB were willing to go to keep anyone from finding out
about the metaphysical struggle. My favorite ad hominem attack:
What it boils down to is that not a single legitimate research
organization in the 9/11 Truth movement supports any of these
crackpot disinfo theories. Not scholars, pilots, architects and
engineers, lawyers, firefighters, 9/11 bloggers, Loose Change, you
name it. Nobody supports these fringe theories. [all “illegitimate”
organizations run by the CIA]
Question 9 for 9/11 Smarties
What is the significance of the planetary archetypal
situation on September 11, 2001?
May 13, 2011
Question 9
What is the significance of the planetary
archetypal situation on September 11 (In the last few weeks, the
planetary alignment that represents the heaviest - the darkest, most
weighty, mortally serious, historically grave - of all archetypal
combinations, the Saturn-Pluto alignment, reached exactitude, an
opposition)?
-
Option 1 - Terrorists are superstitious
and planned the attack on America to coincide with the Saturn-Pluto
alignment.
-
Option 2 - Since Nancy Reagan moved out
of the White House no one would be concerned with Astrology or the
planetary alignment. Therefore the timing of the New Pearl Harbor
that coincided with the Saturn-Pluto alignment is just one of those
coincidences that doesn’t happen very often… like the same person
winning the lottery three weeks in a row.
-
Option 3 - DEWs work better when the
Saturn-Pluto alignment is in opposition to each other.
-
Option 4 - TPTB initiated the arm
wrestling match in violation of
rule #15032 because when the
planetary alignment that represents the heaviest - the darkest, most
weighty, mortally serious, historically grave - of all archetypal
combinations, the Saturn-Pluto alignment, reached exactitude, an
opposition… occurs then the Earth is the most vulnerable and TPTB
would have the advantage in an arm wrestling match.
Question 10 for 9/11 Smarties
How is it possible that 90% of the occupants in the
Twin Towers were evacuated safely on September 11, 2001?
May 15, 2011
Question 10
Why Ground Zero? The buildings hold 17,400
people.
How is it possible 90% of the occupants in
the Twin Towers below the impact zone were evacuated safely. And,
finally, why did the South Tower, that was hit second collapse first?
-
Option 1 - Ground Zero is the location
of the World Trade Center, the symbol of our freedom to go shopping.
When kerosene (jet fuel) takes on the qualities of an explosive
demolition agent the characteristics and reaction times are
unpredictable.
-
Option 2 - Ground Zero is the location
of the World Trade Center, where an attack was guaranteed to shatter
Americans’ sense of security and justify a war on “terrorism” and A
New Pearl Harbor.
Thermite/thermate/super thermate/mini Hydrogen-bomb (mini-nuke)
detonations were delayed in both towers because the Neocons “got a
call from the, er, fire department commander,” telling them that the
American people were so gullible that they would accept 2,819 deaths
as a mass murder, and therefore since, “we’ve had such terrible loss
of life, maybe the compassionate thing to do is wait, to pull it.”
And they made that decision to wait 73
minutes to pull the South tower, and 102 minutes to pull the North
Tower, and we watched while the delays allowed 90% of the occupants
of the Towers below the impact zones to be safely evacuated. [11q]
-
Option 3 - Ground Zero is a location
where 50 million tons of mass could be reduced largely to dust with
an Exotic Weapon. (DEW)
To minimize the loss of life when a DEW is fired at a target that is
occupied by humans, the operator can set an elapsed time delay.
The elapse time setting for the South Tower was 73 minutes, the
North Tower, 102 minutes from the time the weapon was fired and
created the impact holes (the holes were designed to make you
believe that Airplanes were flown into Twin Towers,
see #6).
The delay allowed 90% of the occupants of the Towers below the
impact zones to be evacuated safely.
-
Option 4 - Ground Zero is the location
of The Twin Towers of the World Trade Center which were were micro
cities with powerful electric systems.
-
8:46 a.m. – Arm Wrestling initiated
by TPTB, in violation of
rule #15032, at the electro-magnetic grid location
40° 42′ 41.3852″, -74° 0′ 44.0064 (One World Trade Center).
The TPTB began with a surge in backpressure. The Sidemore
technique had a high probability of success because the powerful
electromagnetic frequencies from the micro cities would
interfere with the Earth’s energy. The intention was to further
weaken an Earth (suffering from decades of environmental damage
and pollution) which possessed greater strength than TPTB.
Although the Sidemore attack failed, TPTB knew that the Earth
would not throw her weight into the match and pin TPTB.
Why? Because the energy required in a top-roll maneuver would
result in the collapse of the North and South Tower Arm
Wrestling table legs, killing all 17,400 occupants in an
unusually horrible and agonizing death.
The Earth would never do such an abominable thing to innocent
bystanders (Click
here to read why TPTB killed 70 million people to
ensure the Jews arrived in Haifa not in 1946, or 1950 but in
1948).
Instead the Earth was limited to a quick surge of backpressure,
releasing enough energy to keep from being pinned and prolonging
the match until the Towers could be safely evacuated.
A top-roll from TPTB locked the Earth in a death grip followed
by 73 minutes of surges from side to side, counting on the micro
cities’ powerful electrical systems to drain the Earth’s energy.
During that time the earth perspired, which explains the
presence of Hurricane Erin off the coast of New York.
-
9:59:04 a.m. Exhausted from the
interference from the electricity and the protracted back and
forth pivots, the Earth’s grip was slipping, the arm and hand
were in the losing position, as they were below two-thirds of
the way to the pin pad.
Because nearly everyone was safely evacuated from the South
Tower, the Earth summoned all of her strength and an enormous
surge of energy came forth. She was able to execute an outside
top-roll maneuver and the match was saved. The energy expended
for the maneuver caused the Arm Wrestling table leg of the South
Tower to collapse.
The match continued an additional 29 minutes while 90% of the
occupants were safely evacuated from the North Tower.
-
10:28:31 a.m. The Earth executed a
top-roll followed by the press. The match was over. The Earth
was declared the winner and the Arm Wrestling table leg of the
North Tower collapsed.
|
