|
9/11 witnesses - who include
fire crew, police officers and media reporters - heard
and saw explosions going off inside the towers, long
before they actually fell. Many witnesses reported
powerful explosions in the basements of the buildings
long before they collapsed.
Plus, controlled demolition
experts agree that the collapses of the three buildings
bear all of the hallmarks of a controlled demolition.
For example, we see demolition "squibs" shooting out of
the windows of the buildings before they started to
collapse. All three buildings collapsed at near freefall
speed.
Building 7, which wasn't hit by a plane and
contained only small scattered fires, came down
symmetrically in just 6-seconds.
And 6-weeks after 9/11,
liquefied steel was found under the rubble of all three
buildings and the temperature was still in excess of
1500F. Jet-fuel simply cannot burn hot enough to reach
that sort of temperature. And many of the steel beams
found in the rubble of the three buildings were cut
diagonally - in exactly the same way as shaped-charges
slice through steel diagonally to bring a building
straight down. Sulfur residue was also found on the
steel beams.
Sulfur used with thermite is
called thermate -- which produces even faster results
than thermite, reaching temperatures of over 4,000F. We
also see red-hot molten steel dripping from the windows
of the towers prior to their collapse. We really need to
wake up to the facts and ask questions. If we don't,
what does that say about us?
If you haven't yet heard
about this subject, please go to Google and find out
about the melting point of steel, and about the maximum
temperature that jet-fuel can reach, and about the use
of thermate shaped-charges in controlled demolitions.
Once you know these facts,
you'll realize that those three buildings simply could
NOT have collapsed in the way they did UNLESS they were
brought down in a controlled demolition. |
|
Part 3
Bombs
in the Buildings
Bombs, explosions, secondary explosions, explosive
devices.... how many more times do we need to hear these
words being said by 9/11 witnesses before we start
asking questions about what really happened on that
awful day?
These witnesses include fire crew, police
officers and media reporters - who all heard and saw
explosions going off inside the towers, long before they
actually fell.
Many witnesses reported
powerful explosions in the basements of the buildings
long before they collapsed. Plus, controlled demolition
experts agree that the collapses of the three buildings
bear all of the hallmarks of a controlled demolition.
For example, we see demolition "squibs" shooting out of
the windows of the buildings before they started to
collapse. All three buildings collapsed at near freefall
speed. Building 7, which wasn't hit by a plane and
contained only small scattered fires, came down
symmetrically in just 6-seconds.
And 6-weeks after 9/11,
liquefied steel was found under the rubble of all three
buildings and the temperature was still in excess of
1500F. Jet-fuel simply cannot burn hot enough to reach
that sort of temperature. And many of the steel beams
found in the rubble of the three buildings were cut
diagonally - in exactly the same way as shaped-charges
slice through steel diagonally to bring a building
straight down.
Sulfur residue was also found on the
steel beams. Sulfur used with thermite is called
thermate -- which produces even faster results than
thermite, reaching temperatures of over 4,000F. We also
see red-hot molten steel dripping from the windows of
the towers prior to their collapse. How much more
evidence do we need before the government and mainstream
media finally talks about this issue?
By ignoring this
issue, the government and media are just insulting our
intelligence!
|
Part 4
1,000 Cameras and No Airplane!
I am not saying that the Pentagon wasn't hit by a plane
on 9/11, however we have every right to be suspicious
when we look at the facts. My gut feeling is that the
Pentagon WAS hit by a plane, but I find it hard to
believe that the plane was the Flight 77 Boeing 757 jet.
The Pentagon is the most guarded building on the planet,
with countless CCTV cameras covering every part of the
building both inside and out.
Plus there are many
establishments in the immediate area, such as gas
stations, hotels, etc, that have CCTV cameras. Yet the
US government refuses to release any images or video
that actually shows a plane approaching the Pentagon on
9/11, let alone a Boeing 757.
Within minutes of the
crash, the FBI confiscated CCTV footage from all of the
establishments in the immediate area, and they refuse to
show us any of that footage. The only images they have
released were only released after years of demands under
the Freedom of Information Act, and none of those images
show an actual airplane.
If a Boeing 757 really did hit
the Pentagon then why not show us the footage? And what
about the lack of any wreckage from a Boeing 757, and
the lack of bodies, and the fact that the damage to the
Pentagon wall is not consistent with what you'd expect
if it had been hit by a Boeing 757 -- the hole is way
too small for a start.
And if the alleged terrorists had
wanted to wreak maximum damage, then why would they fly
the plane into the only part of the Pentagon that had
recently been re-inforced, and the only part of the
Pentagon that housed the accountants who were looking
into the disappearance of over a trillion dollars from
the US economy?
And in any case, the flight instructor
of the alleged hijackers said that these people were
useless at flying even the smallest aircraft, and yet
we're expected to believe that they carried out an
extremely difficult 360 degree maneuver and managed to
fly the Boeing just a few feet from the ground as it
approached the Pentagon.
Whichever way you want to look
at it, this just doesn't quite add up, it's like trying
to put a square peg into a round hole.
|