The myriad of theories surrounding 9/11 have
served the perpetrators well for almost 7 years, giving the false impression
freedom of speech was alive and well but ultimately spreading an almost
Most "911truth" organizations are run by the same people who organized this
sham. This in order to 'control' the opposition, for as long as possible, in
the hope it would all fade away one day in the public consciousness.
As most theories have built on the false assumption that airplanes were
involved, the 'plane' myth has held strong - in spite of the widespread
understanding no airliner crashed at the Pentagon or in Shanksville.
The misheld belief that 'thousands of New Yorkers' saw passenger planes crash
into the twin towers is upheld solely by the relentless pounding of the
the higher levels of which have complied to the requirements of this
military false-flag operation.
Virtually all firsthand witnesses to the first "plane" were news-people as
shown in SEPTEMBER CLUES Part 4 (see it at bottom page). As for the second "plane", most witnesses on
reported 'a SMALL AIRCRAFT' or even 'A MISSILE' . These reports were
actually aired on the day but never again.
Only about 36 videos exist depicting a large airplane silhouette impacting
the towers. All of them are, by now, proven fakes. Many turn out to be
simply cropped duplicates of the same composite, while most disqualify each
other by the way of irreconcilable differences: trajectories, angles, pitch,
yaw, speeds, lighting, hues - you name it. The few clips showing the actual
'plane' penetration depict a wide body aluminum airliner penetrating the
steel-frame tower effortlessly without as much as a rear aileron breaking
This is of course utterly absurd and makes a joke of the laws of
The current reluctance of most people to recognize and accept this research
is - in many ways - understandable, the foremost cause being the massive
conditioning power of the mainstream news-media.
However, the many errors made by the authors of these diverse video
forgeries will not stand the test of time. Various doctoring techniques were
likely used. Some of the fake footage (mainly the LIVE broadcasts which
needed a high level of real-time control) used hybrid, multi-layered imagery
with digital simulations of the Manhattan landscape. Others betray textures
and 'grey-boxing' glitches much similar to geo-referenced imagery. More
'realistic' looking clips (the "amateur" films released later) were likely
real shots of the strike with added CGI Boeing767-silhouette pasted
frame-by-frame over the smaller missile.
This branch of 9/11 truth research is naturally being vigorously attacked
and billed as "disinformation" - as it contains the only demonstrable and
repeatable proof of this murderous hoax: no one is going to prove HOW the
towers fell or that a NORAD stand-down WAS ordered.
This is what the
perpetrators are counting on...
Watch the Complete Video
9/11 CNN Tape - Suspicious