| 
			
 
 
  
  by Irvin Baxter, Jr.
 
			from
			
			TheForbidedenKnowledge Website
 
			 A young American diplomat was the 
			leading force in the designing of the United Nations. He was 
			secretary of the Dumbarten Oaks Conversations from August to 
			October of 1944 where most of the preliminary planning for the 
			U.N. was done. He was Roosevelt’s right-hand man in February of 
			1945 at Yalta where the postwar boundaries of Europe were 
			drawn (Roosevelt 
			
			 was a dying man at the time. His death came 
			only ten weeks later). At Yalta it was agreed that the Soviet 
			Union would have three votes (one each for Russia, Ukraine, and 
			Byelorussia) in the U.N. General Assembly, even though the 
			United States had only one. At Yalta much of Europe was placed under 
			the iron heel of communist rule. At Yalta, Churchill,
			Roosevelt, and Stalin appointed this young diplomatic 
			shining star to be the 
			
			first Secretary-general of the U.N. 
			for the founding conference held in San Francisco, April/June of 
			1945. 
 All 
			of this seemed well and good until three years later. 
			
			Alger Hiss
			(image below left) was exposed as a 
			communist spy and sent to prison. Only then did people understand 
			why the emblem of the United Nations 
			(image right) looked so much like the 
			emblem of the Soviet Union (image below 
			right). It now made sense that the Soviet 
			Union, at Yalta, was given control over all of
 
				
					| 
					 
					The emblem of 
					the SSR |  
			Eastern Europe. Then 
			everyone understood how the Soviet Union managed to capture three 
			votes in the U.N. General Assembly compared to one for the 
			United States. Then it became 
			
			 clear 
			why a secret deal had been struck stating that a communist would 
			always hold the office of of head of the U.N. military. 
 The U.N. charter was authored by a communist, the first U.N. 
			Secretary-general was a communist, and the U.N., from the beginning, 
			was designed to be a Union of World Socialist Republics.
 
 On a recent tour of the U.N., not one mention was made of any 
			of this by our guide. Hiss’ name was not mentioned one time. 
			When pictures of the founding conference contained his picture, our 
			U.N. guide avoided telling us who it was.
 
 I’m sure everyone was taught about the United Nations and its 
			importance in school, but I’m also sure that the above information 
			was conveniently omitted from your textbooks!
 
 
			 Secret 
			agreement: U.N. military to always be commanded by a communist
 
			 One of the most 
			important positions within the entire United Nations—if not 
			the most important—is that of Undersecretary-general for 
			Political and Security Council Affairs. Most Americans have 
			never even heard of this position, much
 less anything about the man who holds the job. The 
			undersecretary-general for political and security council 
			affairs has three main areas of responsibility. They are:
 
				
					
					
					Control of all military and 
					police functions of the United Nations peacekeeping 
					forces
					
					Supervision of all disarmament 
					moves on the part of member nations 
					
					Control of all atomic energy 
					ultimately entrusted to the United nations for peaceful and 
					“other purposes” 
			 In view of the fact that these three 
			functions may soon constitute the ultimate power of life and 
			death over every human being on the face of the earth (once 
			national disarmament is achieved and all military is under the 
			control of the U.N.), there would appear to be some minor 
			justification for us to be more than passingly curious over who 
			wields this power. Since the United Nations was created in 
			1945 there have been fifteen men appointed to the 
			position of undersecretary-general of political and security 
			council affairs. Astonishingly, every single one of them has been a 
			communist!
 Communists appointed to the position of undersecretary-general:
 
				
					
						
						
						Arkady Sobolev--USSR 
						(1946-1949) 
						
						Konstantin Zinchenko—USSR 
						(1949-53) 
						
						Ilya Tehernychev—Yugoslavia 
						(1954-1957) 
						
						Anatoly F. Dobrynin—USSR 
						(1958-1960) 
						
						Georgi Ptrovich Arkadev—USSR 
						(1960-1962) 
						
						Eugeny Dmiterievich Kiselev—USSR 
						(1962-1963) 
						
						Vladimir Pavolovich Suslov—USSR 
						(1963-1963) 
						
						Alexie E. Nesterenko—USSR 
						(1965-1968) 
						
						Leonid N. Kutakov—USSR 
						(1968-1973) 
						
						Arkady N. Shevchenko—USSR 
						(1973-1978) 
						
						Mikhail D. Sytenko—USSR 
						(1978-1981) 
						
						Viacheslav A. Ustinov—USSR 
						(1981-1986) 
						
						Uasiliy S. Safronchuk—USSR 
						(1987-1992) 
						
						Vladimir Petrovsky—Russia , 
						“former USSR (1992-) 
						
						James O. C. Jonah—Sierra 
						Leone (Co-chairman)  
			 Some observers feel that fifteen 
			Communists out of fifteen appointees constitutes a trend of sorts. 
			But whatever we call it, Trygve Lie, the first 
			secretary-general of the United Nations, revealed that this pattern 
			was no mere coincidence. In his book In the cause of Peace 
			Lie wrote:  
				
				"Mr. Vyshinsky (of the USSR) 
				did not delay his approach. He was the first to inform me of an 
				understanding which the Big Five had reached in London on the 
				appointment of a Soviet national as assistant secretary-general 
				for political and security council affairs...
 "Mr. Stettinius (U.S Secretary of State) confirmed to me 
				that he had agreed with the Soviet delegation in the matter...
 
 "The preservation of international peace and security was the 
				organization’s highest responsibility, and it was to entrusting 
				the direction of the Secretariat department most concerned with 
				this to a Soviet national that the Americans had agreed."
 
				(From
				
				The Fearful Master by Edward 
				Griffin) 
			  
			 Every U.N. 
			Secretary-general has been a socialist 
			 No wonder someone said that the truth is stranger than fiction! This
			incredible saga of the United Nations just goes on and on. 
			Perhaps the most revealing fact of all concerning the powers that 
			control the United Nations is that every single Secretary-general 
			since the U.N.’s formation has been a socialist.
 
				
				
				Trygve Lie from Norway was 
				the first elected head of the U.N. He was chosen by the 
				fifteen-member U.N. Security Council and ratified by the U.N. 
				General Assembly on February 1, 1946.
 Lie, at the age of twenty-three, was appointed secretary 
				in charge of administration of the Norwegian Labor Party. The 
				socialist lawyer served as Minister of Justice until June 1939, 
				when a Cabinet reorganization made him Minister of Commerce. In 
				April 1945, Lie was chosen to head the Norwegian 
				delegation to the United Nations Founding Conference at San 
				Francisco. At the conference itself he was chosen chairman of 
				Commission III which was charged with drafting the charter of 
				the Security Council of the United Nations, "the 
				organ...which would have the power to act against aggressors."
 
				
				Dag Hammarskjold of Sweden 
				was elected Secretary-general of the United Nations on April 7, 
				1953. At the age of thirty, Hammarskjold became Undersecretary 
				of the Swedish Ministry of Finance. At the Ministry he worked 
				under the Fabian socialist economist Ernst Wigforss, 
				whom he once said considered his second father. Sweden has long 
				been the leading socialist state of Western Europe, taxing its 
				citizens at a 75% rate.
				
				U Thant of Burma was elected 
				Secretary-general of the U.N. on November 30, 1962. According to 
				Current Biography 1962, U Thant considered himself a democratic 
				socialist.
				
				Kurt Waldheim of Austria took 
				office as Secretary-general of the United Nations on January 1, 
				1972. Waldheim had been Austria’s U.N. ambassador from 1964 to 
				1968. When the Austrian Socialist party won the March 1970 
				elections, Waldheim again became Austria’s U.N. 
				representative. After serving two terms as U.N. 
				Secretary-general, Waldheim became the head of Austria. It was 
				revealed that Waldheim had lied about his role while 
				serving in the Nazi forces of Adolf Hitler. Facts that were 
				made known resulted in Waldheim being banished from the United 
				States, even though he was the head of Austria.
				
				Javier Perez de Cuellar 
				became U.N. Secretary-general on December 15, 1981. In his 
				address to the General Assembly after being sworn in, Perez de 
				Cuellar called the disparity in wealth between rich and poor 
				nations a violation of "the most fundamental human rights." 
				During his administration, some third-world spokesmen complained 
				that Perez de Cuellar had not been sufficiently outspoken 
				in promoting the massive transfer of resources from rich to poor 
				nations on a global scale (Wealth redistribution has always been 
				the central plank in the platform of international socialism).
				
				
				Boutros Boutros-Ghali, the 
				former foreign minister of Egypt, became the first African to 
				head the U.N. on January 1, 1992.  
					
					
					"If I was offered the job (of 
					secretary-general) five years ago," Ghali said, "I 
					would have turned it down. The U.N. then was a dead horse, 
					but after the end of the Cold War, the U.N. has a special 
					position."    
				Politically, Boutros-Ghali 
				was a member of the Arab Socialist Union. 
			 Is it coincidence that one communist 
			and six socialists have headed the United Nations since 
			its birth in 1945? Does it seem strange at all that the driving 
			message of the U.N., the message of wealth redistribution, is the 
			central message of international communism? Do you find it amazing 
			that the United States has allowed the Soviet Union to have three 
			votes to our one in the United Nations since 1945? With the 
			supposed dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1992, each of the 
			fifteen member of the ex-Soviet Union now have a vote in the U.N. So 
			now we are outvoted fifteen to one. Yet Russia retains the right to 
			invade these states if they get out of line.
 So what does all this mean? The plain truth is that the 
			United Nations has been designed to be a communistic world 
			government from its very beginning.
 
 What will happen? The United Nations will obtain the world 
			domination that it has been planning for since its beginning. 
			Communism will achieve its dream of ruling the world, but only for a 
			very short time.
 
 
			  |