This makes sense when one understands that the
Hidden Evil is the Establishment's policy. She described that those who
tried to resolve their issues through existing support mechanisms
encountered: Apathy and indifference on the part of congress and state
legislators, attempted discrediting by psychiatrists, lack of interest
and/or competency in legal circles, little or no assistance from police, and
a refusal of both the ACLU and Amnesty International to intervene.
As already demonstrated, congress is subservient to the Think Tanks.
This tactic was heavily used in Russia, where they would subject people to the penal and mental health systems who were critical of the dictatorship. Professor Marrs observed,
Some doctors who were aware of existing conditions of targeted patients deliberately put them on a regimen of drugs in order to worsen pre-existing conditions.
The CIA is apparently famous for using this tactic. In his book, Journey Into Madness: The True Story of Secret CIA Mind Control and Medical Abuse, Gordon Thomas wrote,
He continued,
Apparently the Stasi would use doctors to help destroy enemies of the state as well. Fulbrook wrote,
Attorneys will not generally assist. Some have allegedly deliberately sabotaged cases. In Germany, targets found themselves in a similar situation; Funder stated,
Police will not assist. Standard practice seems
to be dismissing targeted individuals that report this as lunatics. Some
police acknowledge the existence of this program, but won't intervene with
what they believe to be operations by U.S. Intelligence. Federal law
enforcement will not assist either.
McKinney stated,
Obviously, the top leadership in both organizations has been told to stand down while terrorists and undesirables are dealt with.
This excuse has been used countless times throughout history,
What this means is that those in charge of the dictatorship are doing their roundup.
This is standard dictatorship installation.
National Security is very likely the reason used to keep these organizations
from assisting targeted people. This program thrives so the elite can target
anyone who they either dislike or think is a potential threat to their
control.
Compare this to the group stalking program used in Germany, where the definition of "enemy" increased as time went on.
Remember, the Stasi and their colossal network of citizen informants existed to keep the criminals who ran the state in control.
According to CNN, this happened until about 1/3rd of the population was targeted in some manner.
Most people don't want to face the horror of acknowledging that something like this is going on. They don't want to entertain the possibility that, yes - it's happening again, their own government has turned into a monster.
When you make someone aware of the possibility that their government has been hijacked and has sinister plans for the population they're presented with a choice. They can believe you and have their world turned upside down. Or they can deny that it exists. Some people don't have the constitution to acknowledge insanity of this magnitude.
This type of denial is probably an unconscious
protection mechanism that activates in order to prevent a nervous breakdown.
He wrote,
Professor Marrs summed it up this way:
Apparently even some TIs don't believe the government is carrying this out.
There are probably several reasons for this. First, they may be informants whose purpose is to mislead. They may just not be aware of the scope of it due to lack of study.
Or, they may not want to admit that it's really that bad. In other words, denial.
The masses of people in Germany and Russia were not aware that a dictatorship was being setup right in front of them. It can never happen here, right? It'd be all over the news... Entire countries have been under mind-control in past dictatorships. Professor Marrs contributes this to a type of denial that has occurred repeatedly throughout history.
He asks,
Some are fully aware that this program exists and how well funded, organized, and widespread it is.
They're afraid that they'll become targeted if they attempt to expose it. Some who have tried to assist targeted people have become targets themselves. This is too big, widespread, powerful, and difficult to prove. So the popular and safe response is to pretend that the monster doesn't exist. Or pretend that it's not really a monster and join with it.
The bottom line is that this is just too evil for most people to deal with.
If you're targeted, you may have trouble trying to convince someone who has spent most of their life watching sporting events, soap operas, corporate-controlled news, or playing video games, that this exists.
The people who exist inside these ruts (most people) are under a form of mind-control. People, including some friends and family, may deny your claim that this exists. They may just not want to believe such a thing is possible.
They may tell you,
Or similar remarks.
Of course in the back of their minds they're thinking,
My message to those who know what this is about is this: It is only getting worse. If you've read the previous chapters on history you know what they've done. Also, look into the facts related to 9/11. If you keep giving in, it will only be a matter of time before a family member becomes targeted.
How will you feel when you are forced to harass your son, daughter or sibling?
They either didn't respond, or they did not acknowledge that this program exists. I wrote a letter to the author of a book on stalking, who also happens to be the director of a large, popular anti-stalking organization.
She responded by telling me that I should seek
help from a psychiatrist. This women's reply also contained hints that I
must have done something to provoke it and that I deserved it.
So, this would be an example of an organization that has a vested interest in covering up this epidemic. It is possible that her clinic is also being used for disinformation.
All standard mainstream support organizations participate in the cover-up. This includes the legal and medical community, human rights organizations, local and federal law enforcement, and congress. In all likelihood, the national security act is preventing these organizations from intervening.
Additionally, denial and fear may prevent some
from recognizing the situation.
|