|
by Jon Rappoport
August 1, 2016
from
JonRappoport Website
Votes are being counted
as fractions instead of
as whole numbers.
As we know, there are a number of ways to rig an election. Bev
Harris, at
blackboxvoting.org, is exploring a
specific "cheat sheet" that has vast implications for the Trump
vs.
Hillary 2016 contest.
It's a vote-counting system called
GEMS - Global Election Management
System.
I urge you to dive into her multi-part series, Fraction Magic
(Part-1
here).
Here are key Harris quotes. They're all
shockers:
"Our testing [of GEMS] shows that
one vote can be counted 25 times, another only one
one-thousandth of a time, effectively converting some votes to
zero."
"This report summarizes the results of our review of the GEMS
election management system, which counts approximately 25
percent of all votes in the United States.
The results of this study
demonstrate that a fractional vote feature is embedded in each
GEMS application which can be used to invisibly, yet radically,
alter election outcomes by pre-setting desired vote percentages
to redistribute votes.
This tampering is not visible to
election observers, even if they are standing in the room and
watching the computer.
Use of the decimalized vote feature
is unlikely to be detected by auditing or canvass procedures,
and can be applied across large jurisdictions in less than 60
seconds."
"GEMS vote-counting systems are and have been operated under
five trade names:
-
Global Election Systems
-
Diebold Election Systems
-
Premier Election Systems
-
Dominion Voting Systems
-
Election Systems & Software,
...in addition to a number of
private regional subcontractors.
At the time of this writing, this
system is used statewide in,
Alaska, Connecticut, Georgia,
Mississippi, New Hampshire, Utah and Vermont, and for
counties in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida,
Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Massachusetts,
Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas,
Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin and Wyoming. It is also used
in Canada."
"Instead of '1' the vote is allowed
to be 1/2, or 1+7/8, or any other value that is not a whole
number."
"Weighting a race [through the use of GEMS] removes the
principle of 'one person-one vote' to allow some votes to be
counted as less than one or more than one.
Regardless of what the real votes
are, candidates can receive a set percentage of votes. Results
can be controlled.
For example, Candidate A can be
assigned 44% of the votes, Candidate B 51%, and Candidate C the
rest."
"All evidence that [rigged] fractional values ever existed [in
the GEMS system] can be removed instantly even from the
underlying database using a setting in the GEMS data tables, in
which case even instructing GEMS to show the [rigged] decimals
will fail to reveal they were used."
"Source code: Instructions to treat votes as decimal values
instead of whole numbers [i.e., rigging] are inserted multiple
times in the GEMS source code itself; thus, this feature cannot
have been created by accident."
A contact who, so far, apparently wishes
to remain anonymous states the following about the history of the
GEMS system:
"The Fractional vote [rigging]
portion traces directly to Jeffrey W. Dean, whose wife
was primary stockholder of the company that developed GEMS.
He ran the company but was
prohibited from handling money or checks due to a criminal
conviction for computer fraud, for which he spent 4 years in
prison.
Almost immediately after being
released from prison he was granted intimate access to elections
data and large government contracts for ballot printing and
ballot processing."
I see no effort on the part of the
federal government, state governments, or the mainstream press to
investigate the GEMS system or respond to Bev Harris' extensive
analysis.
It's not as if media outlets are unaware of her.
From
shesource.org, here is an excerpt
from her bio:
"Bev Harris has been referred to as
'the godmother' of the election reform movement. (Boston Globe).
Vanity Fair magazine credits her
with founding the movement to reform electronic voting. Time
Magazine calls her book, Black Box Voting, 'the bible' of
electronic voting…
Harris's investigations have led
some to call her the 'Erin Brockovich of elections.' (Salon.com)…
Harris has supervised five 'hack demonstrations' in the field,
using real voting machines.
These have been covered by the
Associated Press, the Washington Post, and in formal reports by
the United States General Accounting Office…"
Source
So far, her analysis of GEMS seems to be
labeled "too hot to handle."
Press outlets prefer to report the
slinging of mud from both Presidential candidates' camps. Meanwhile,
the actual results
of the coming elections - including Congressional
races - appear to be up for grabs, depending on who
controls GEMS.
U.S. "Democracy" in
Action
- Report Shows 91% of
Americans Didn't Want Clinton or Trump -
by John Vibes
August 02, 2016
from
TheFreeThoughtProject Website
|
John Vibes is an
author and researcher who organizes a number of large
events including the Free Your Mind Conference. He also
has a publishing company where he offers a censorship
free platform for both fiction and non-fiction writers.
You can contact him and stay connected to his work at
his Facebook page. You can purchase his books, or get
your own book published at his website
www.JohnVibes.com. |
A recent report published by
The New York Times has pointed out
that an overwhelming majority of Americans, 91% of them in
fact, did not support or vote for
Clinton or Trump
in the recent primary elections.
The figures were calculated from statistics that were gathered by,
The figures illustrate that scores of
people living in America are not allowed to vote, and are considered
ineligible due to their age, prior arrests, or incomplete
citizenship applications.
In total, there are 103 million people who are essentially banned
from voting, so this demographic would technically fall into the
category of people who did not support Trump or Clinton in the
primaries, although their actual preference can't be determined.
Furthermore, there is an increasingly significant portion of the US
population that is deciding not to vote on principle,
because they don't feel particularly enthusiastic about any of the
candidates.
It was determined that 88 million people who were eligible to vote,
did not vote in the primaries, and will not be voting in the general
elections either. These are principled non-voters who have refused
to put their consent into a system that they don't believe is
legitimate.
Of the Americans who do plan on voting in the main elections this
November, most of them didn't vote in the primary elections.
According to the report in the Times, an additional 73 million did
not vote in the primaries this year, but will most likely vote in
the general election.
In total, roughly 60 million people voted in the primaries, with
about 30 million voting for Republicans and another 30 million
voting for Democrats.
The funny thing about this, though, is
the fact that most of these voters supported other candidates in the
primaries since there was a wider group of politicians from which
they can choose.
Although Clinton and Trump did finish in the lead, they only needed
a very small percentage of eligible voters to win the nomination.
When looking at the overall level of support they have among the
average American, that number is even smaller.
Together, Clinton and Trump had
the support of roughly,
This may seem strange, but this is
actually the case in every single election.
The vast majority of American residents
do not vote, and thus it would be safe to assume that
at least a significant portion of these nearly 200 million people
would prefer
to have no president at all.
More related information:
|
